Spotlight on Capecitabine in Colorectal Cancer

Capecitabine is an orally administered fluoropyrimidine which is selectively activated in tumor tissue to the active moiety fluorouracil and is cytotoxic through inhibition of DNA synthesis. In patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, first-line therapy with intermittent capecitabine achieved significantly higher objective tumor response rates than therapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin in pooled analysis. Response rates were also higher in patients pretreated in the adjuvant setting and whose primary site of metastasis was the lung. However, no significant differences between the two treatment groups were seen in the time to disease progression, time to treatment failure or overall survival. Preliminary data suggest that response may be improved by combining capecitabine with other anticancer therapies such as oxaliplatin, irinotecan and radiotherapy. Capecitabine in therapeutic dosage regimens generally has acceptable tolerability. Diarrhea and hand-and-foot syndrome are the major dose-limiting toxicities associated with capecitabine therapy, with adverse effects generally of a gastrointestinal nature. Overall, diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea and alopecia were significantly less common with capecitabine than with bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin. In addition, capecitabine recipients experienced significantly less myelosuppression, although more capecitabine recipients discontinued therapy because of adverse events. Importantly, patients spent less time in hospital after capecitabine than after bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin therapy, and the oral route of administration of capecitabine is likely to be preferred. In conclusion, capecitabine has shown superior tumor response, less myelosuppression, but more grade 3 hand-and-foot syndrome, in comparison with the ‘Mayo Clinic’ regimen of fluorouracil therapy, but is unlikely to improve survival. Significantly, its oral route of administration is likely to be preferred by patients. Future strategies to improve patient response may involve selection of those patients likely to respond best to capecitabine, through determination of relevant enzyme levels and combination of capecitabine with various antineoplastic agents. Data on the effect of the drug on quality of life would help to further establish its role. In the meantime, capecitabine appears to offer an effective and more convenient alternative to fluorouracil as first-line monotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.     

Clinical experience of capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer

Results from two phase II studies in metastatic breast cancer have shown that the novel, tumour-selective fluoropyrimidine capecitabine provides an effective and well tolerated therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer failing or resistant to anthracycline and taxane therapy. Response rates of between 20 and 25% have been observed, with median survival of 12.2-12.6 months. In addition, there was an acceptable incidence of adverse events including diarrhoea and hand-foot syndrome, which can be controlled with a dose reduction. Promising results from two further randomised, phase II studies have indicated that capecitabine may also play a role in first- and second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Capecitabine compared favourably with paclitaxel in anthracycline-resistant patients and with intravenous (i.v.) CMF (cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)) in post-menopausal women who had received no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, with high efficacy and good tolerability. The results of these four phase II studies demonstrate that capecitabine is active and well tolerated in a range of settings for metastatic breast cancer.     

The role of capecitabine in first-line treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer

Capecitabine is an important drug in the therapeutic armamentarium for metastatic breast cancer. A comprehensive worldwide clinical trial program involving >10,000 patients with locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer has provided evidence for the current treatment strategies. On the basis of data demonstrating consistent activity across several trials in patients with heavily pretreated breast cancer, capecitabine was approved in the U.S. in 1998 for the treatment of patients with metastatic disease resistant to paclitaxel and anthracycline-containing therapy, with later European Union approval for single-agent capecitabine in the metastatic setting. Capecitabine plus docetaxel (XT) was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in 2001 on the basis of the large phase III trial comparing XT with docetaxel alone, which showed a survival advantage for combination therapy compared with single-agent therapy. This was shortly followed by European approval for the combination in metastatic breast cancer. The clinical utility of capecitabine in the management of breast cancer is supported by its convenient oral dosing schedule and favorable safety profile, as well as its excellent clinical activity in primary and metastatic breast cancer. Recently, clinical trials have studied single-agent capecitabine as first-line treatment and evaluated other capecitabine-containing combinations with cytotoxic and novel targeted agents.     

Future treatment options with capecitabine in solid tumours

The oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine is attracting great interest in the context of tumour-selective therapy and rationally designed combination regimens. Agents such as taxanes upregulate thymidine phosphorylase (TP), and there is therefore a clear rationale for their combination with capecitabine. Preclinical studies of capecitabine/taxane combination therapy demonstrated synergistic antitumour activity and phase I studies showed encouraging efficacy. Therefore, a randomised, phase III trial (docetaxel versus docetaxel/capecitabine) has been initiated in anthracycline-refractory metastatic breast cancer patients. Recruitment is complete. In colorectal cancer, capecitabine/oxaliplatin combination therapy is promising and a phase I, dose-finding trial has been conducted in patients with refractory metastatic solid tumours. A similar trial has evaluated capecitabine/irinotecan combination treatment. Capecitabine is also being investigated as adjuvant therapy for colorectal and breast cancers. The primary objective of the ongoing X-ACT trial in almost 2000 Dukes' C colon cancer patients is to demonstrate at least equivalent disease-free survival between capecitabine and the Mayo Clinic regimen. In addition, the CALGB is planning a randomised, phase III trial of capecitabine versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide or cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF) as adjuvant treatment in high-risk, node-negative breast cancer patients aged >65 years.     

Capecitabine plus docetaxel combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

Doxifluridine(5'-DFUR)is converted to its metabolite 5-FU by the enzyme thymidine phosphorylase(TP). TP is expressed significantly higher in tumor tissue than in normal tissue. Capecitabine(N4-pentoxylcarbonyl -5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine)is a pro-drug of 5'-DFUR and a novel fluoropyrimidine carbamate that is converted to 5-FU preferentially in tumor tissue through a three-step enzymatic cascade. Expression of TP in tumor tissue may clinically predict efficacy of capecitabine. Induction of TP activity has brought about enhancement of capecitabine efficacy by taxanes in human cancer xenografts. In addition, a phase III study directly comparison docetaxel monotherapy and docetaxel plus capecitabine has been conducted for metastatic breast cancer patients who had received anthracyclines. The overall response rate of the combination group was 42%(n=255), and that of the monotherapy group was 30%(n=256)(p=0.006). The primary endpoints were time to disease progression, and time to treatment failure, and these parameters were superior in the combination arm than in the single arm, suggesting that capecitabine sensitization by docetaxel might be a new approach to breast cancer treatment.     

Review of capecitabine as oral treatment of gastric, gastroesophageal, and esophageal cancers

Capecitabine is a novel, orally administered fluoropyrimidine carbamate that has been approved for adjuvant treatment in patients with Stage III colon cancer, first-line metastatic colorectal cancer, and metastatic breast cancer, both as a single agent (for patients who are resistant to paclitaxel and anthracyclines) and in combination with docetaxel (after failure on anthracycline-based therapy). Capecitabine is being investigated in Phase I and II trials for the treatment of gastric, gastroesophageal, and esophageal cancers, primarily in the first-line metastatic setting but also in the adjuvant setting. The MEDLINE data base was searched for English-language clinical trials that were published from 1996 through October 2005 along with relevant abstracts that were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and at meetings of the European Cancer Conference and the European Society of Medical Oncology. The most frequently investigated combinations were capecitabine with docetaxel, paclitaxel, cisplatin, or oxaliplatin, and capecitabine also has been combined with irinotecan. These therapies have yielded efficacy data that compare favorably with data from Phase III trials of parenteral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the first-line metastatic setting, and they mostly are well tolerated. Capecitabine, when combined in doses <1250 mg/m(2) twice daily, consistently resulted in a lower frequency of Grade 3 or 4 toxic effects. Capecitabine, as a representative of oral fluoropymidine, is a promising agent in gastroesophageal cancers. Although some Phase III trials are completed, additional Phase III trials of capecitabine-based combinations that compare its efficacy and safety with parenteral 5-FU-based combinations, in both first-line metastatic and adjuvant settings, would be important.     

The evolving role of capecitabine in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second greatest cause of cancer-related death among women in the United States. Capecitabine is a selectively tumor-activated fluoropyrimidine carbamate that is converted to 5-fluorouracil by the sequential activity of these enzymes, the final of which is thymidine phosphorylase, which is overexpressed in many human cancers. Capecitabine as a single agent and in combination with other drugs is efficacious in previously treated and untreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The integration of capecitabine, either as a single agent or in combination with docetaxel, into adjuvant breast cancer therapy is justified due to its high antitumor activity in previously treated and untreated MBC, its tolerability, lack of cross-resistance with the anthracyclines and taxanes, and because combined docetaxel/capecitabine improves the overall survival of patients with MBC. Capecitabine is being evaluated as preoperative therapy in patients with operable breast cancer, as adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk node-negative or node-positive disease, and as oral single-agent therapy in women > or = 65 years of age. This article is an overview of published studies of capecitabine in MBC and the studies that are planned or have been proposed to evaluate capecitabine as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.     

Role of capecitabine (Xeloda®) in breast cancer

One rationale for the development of new treatment strategies for advanced breast cancer is to provide targeted antineoplastic therapy, while at the same time improving the quality of life of patients. One such drug, capecitabine (Xeloda^®), is an oral fluoropyrimidine 5-fluorouracil carbamate. Capecitabine is converted to 5-fluorouracil primarily in cancer tissue and it has been demonstrated to combine ease of administration, a manageable toxicity profile and potent antineoplastic activity. Capecitabine is widely used in metastatic breast cancer and offers symptom palliation and in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere^®) improved survival compared with docetaxel alone. Its toxicity profile includes hand–foot syndrome and stomatitis and diarrhea, whereas its hematologic side effects are mild. Capecitabine has been evaluated as a single agent in women with advanced breast cancer where it offers an overall response rate of 20–30%. Capecitabine is synergistic with other chemotherapeutic agents, such as the taxanes, where it increases the response rate to over 40%. This review will place the available data on the use of capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer as a single agent or as part of a combination regime in context.     

Dose-adjusting capecitabine minimizes adverse effects while maintaining efficacy: a retrospective review of capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer

Capecitabine monotherapy is considered standard treatment in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer and has proven efficacy in this setting. Randomized studies and retrospective analyses have shown that, in patients who received capecitabine monotherapy, or in combination with docetaxel, dose modification of capecitabine is effective in the management of adverse events without compromising efficacy. Dose adjustment of capecitabine is easy to implement due to its twice-daily oral administration. This article reports the findings of a retrospective review of a large data set to consolidate the information about the impact of capecitabine dose modification on efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Data on dose modification and outcomes were available from 4 phase II capecitabine monotherapy trials, 1 phase III capecitabine/docetaxel combination trial, and an analysis of consecutive patients who received capecitabine outside of a clinical trial (n = 971). Dose reductions were required in 41% of patients who received monotherapy (n = 131) and 65% of patients who received capecitabine/docetaxel (80% of these required dose reductions of both agents) (n = 163). Time to disease progression and overall survival were similar, or even slightly longer, among patients who received lower vs. full-dose capecitabine in all of the studies reviewed. Reduced capecitabine doses were associated with a lower incidence of treatment-related adverse events, specifically hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and stomatitis. Together, these data support the practice of dose-reducing capecitabine, including the possibility of starting at a lower dose (<1250 mg/m(2) twice daily), to reduce the incidence of adverse events without compromising efficacy.     

Role of capecitabine (Xeloda) in breast cancer

One rationale for the development of new treatment strategies for advanced breast cancer is to provide targeted antineoplastic therapy, while at the same time improving the quality of life of patients. One such drug, capecitabine (Xeloda), is an oral fluoropyrimidine 5-fluorouracil carbamate. Capecitabine is converted to 5-fluorouracil primarily in cancer tissue and it has been demonstrated to combine ease of administration, a manageable toxicity profile and potent antineoplastic activity. Capecitabine is widely used in metastatic breast cancer and offers symptom palliation and in combination with docetaxel (Taxotere) improved survival compared with docetaxel alone. Its toxicity profile includes hand-foot syndrome and stomatitis and diarrhea, whereas its hematologic side effects are mild. Capecitabine has been evaluated as a single agent in women with advanced breast cancer where it offers an overall response rate of 20-30%. Capecitabine is synergistic with other chemotherapeutic agents, such as the taxanes, where it increases the response rate to over 40%. This review will place the available data on the use of capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer as a single agent or as part of a combination regime in context.     

卡培他滨单药或联合用药治疗复发／转移性乳腺癌的疗效观察

目的评价卡培他滨（capecitabine）单药或联合用药作为姑息方案治疗复发／转移性乳腺癌的近期疗效和毒副反应。方法卡培他滨单药方案：20例患者每天予卡培他滨2510mg／m2,分早、晚2次口服,连续服用2周后休息1周为1个周期。联合用药方案：17例予卡培他滨联合吉西他滨（GX方案）;15例予卡培他滨联合长春瑞滨（NX方案）;20例予卡培他滨联合多西紫杉醇（TX方案）。每例患者至少进行2个周期的治疗。结果卡培他滨单药方案的有效率为25．0％,中位疾病进展期（TTP）为3．2个月。联合方案中GX方案的有效率为29．4％,TTP为3．7个月;NX方案的有效率为26．7％,TTP为3．5个月;TX方案的有效率为35．0％,TTP为3．8个月。主要毒副反应为白细胞减少、手足综合征、皮肤色素沉着、恶心、呕吐、厌食、疲劳等,少数患者出现口腔炎、头晕、腹泻和胸闷。Ⅲ～IV级毒副反应主要发生在TX方案,发生率为15％。结论作为姑息治疗方案,卡培他滨单药或联合用药治疗复发／转移性乳腺癌的有效率均≥25％,联合用药组的有效率比单药组提高,疾病控制的时间联合用药组较单药组延长。患者对卡培他滨单药及联合用药的毒副反应均可耐受。     

Salvage Therapy with Capecitabine Plus Weekly Paclitaxel in Heavily Pretreated Advanced Breast Cancer

Background:The combination of intravenous paclitaxel (three-times weekly administration at a dose of 175 mg/m²) and oral capecitabine has been shown to be highly active in the treatment of advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Currently, there is much interest in the use of relatively low dose weekly paclitaxel infusions in this clinical setting. Aim:To assess the activity and safety of capecitabine plus weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m²in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients and methods:Patients were required to have pretreated metastatic breast cancer with measurable/ evaluable disease and a performance status of 0–2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score). Capecitabine was administered orally at a dosage of 1000 mg/m²twice daily on days 1–14, followed by a 7-day rest period. Paclitaxel was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion on a weekly basis at a dose of 60 mg/m². Twenty-one days of therapy represented one cycle. Results:The hypothesis of activity of the capecitabine-paclitaxel combination at the level of clinical interest (40% response rate) was accepted when the 15th response was observed and 33 patients were enrolled. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival estimates were 9.2 and 19.6 months, respectively. Therapy was generally well tolerated and manageable on an outpatient basis. The following grade 3/4 adverse events were observed: hand-foot syndrome (21.2%), neutropenia (12.1%), anemia, nausea/vomiting, stomatitis/ mucositis, and nail disorders (all occurred in 9.0%), and vascular/coagulation disorders (<1%). Conclusions:Oral capecitabine plus weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m²has a favorable activity and tolerability profile and is suitable for the treatment of heavily pretreated advanced breast cancer patients.     

Pharmacology and clinical status of capecitabine

Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a new, orally administered, enzyme-activated fluoropyrimidine carbamate designed to generate high levels of fluorouracil (5-FU) in tumor cells. Selective tumor activation of 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, the last enzymatic step of a three-enzyme process, is catalyzed by thymidine phosphorylase, a tumor-associated angiogenic growth factor. Since levels of thymidine phosphorylase are often higher in tumors than in surrounding normal tissues, this stepwise process provides tumor selectivity and potentially decreases toxicity to normal tissues. Preclinical studies show that capecitabine has significant activity against a variety of tumor types when used as monotherapy and in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. Capecitabine is currently approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to paclitaxel (Taxol) and in whom further anthracycline therapy is contraindicated. It has demonstrated efficacy in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma, and studies are ongoing in other tumor types.     

Capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy

BACKGROUND: For patients with anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast carcinoma, capecitabine plus docetaxel significantly increased overall survival compared with docetaxel alone. The current study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the capecitabine/docetaxel combination versus docetaxel monotherapy, comparing the gain in quality-adjusted survival with associated health care costs. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive 21-day cycles of oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily, on Days 1-14, plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Day 1 (n = 255), or docetaxel 100 mg/m2 on Day 1 (n = 256). Health and cost outcomes in the two arms were compared, and cost-effectiveness was estimated. Data on survival time and medical care resource use were prospectively collected in the trial. Costs associated with medical care resource use and quality-of-life adjustments were obtained from the published literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated as the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Capecitabine/docetaxel increased the median overall survival by 3 months compared with docetaxel alone (14.5 vs. 11.5 months). The mean quality-adjusted survival was increased by 1.8 months in the capecitabine/docetaxel group. The total medical-resource utilization cost per patient was 8.9% higher with the combination: 24,475 dollars for combination therapy versus 22,477 dollars for single-agent docetaxel. The mean cost per QALY gained with combination therapy was 13,558 dollars (standard deviation, 6742 dollars). Cost savings due to reduced docetaxel dose and hospital use were the major cost offsets with the combination. Sensitivity analyses showed that varying the mean hospital cost per day from the 5th to the 95th percentile resulted in cost-utility ratios ranging from 20,326 dollars to as low as 6360 dollars. CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine/docetaxel was a cost-effective treatment in patients with anthracycline-pretreated advanced breast carcinoma, and had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio that compares very favorably with that of many other oncology therapies.     

Role of cytotoxics in combination with targeted agents

Combining cytotoxics with targeted agents can lead to enhanced efficacy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Cytotoxic/targeted agent combinations approved for the treatment of MBC include trastuzumab plus paclitaxel or docetaxel for the first-line treatment in patients presenting with HER2-positive breast cancer. Furthermore, in HER2-negative disease combining bevacizumab with paclitaxel for the first-line treatment of HER2-negative patients is superior compared to monotherapy with either drug. Lapatinib plus capecitabine recently received a positive opinion from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) for conditional marketing authorisation in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer following prior therapy with anthracyclines, taxanes and trastuzumab. The novel epothilone ixabepilone is also under investigation in this setting. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic activity in combination with targeted agents including trastuzumab and bevacizumab and early clinical studies have revealed encouraging response rates in combination with trastuzumab and carboplatin in patients with HER2-positive MBC. This article will review recent data on the efficacy of combining cytotoxics with targeted agents for the treatment of MBC.     

Capecitabine plus docetaxel every 3 weeks in first- and second-line metastatic oesophageal cancer: final results of a phase II trial

Capecitabine and docetaxel have single-agent activity in upper gastrointestinal tumours, and have together demonstrated preclinical synergy and a survival benefit in breast cancer, and high response rates in first-line metastatic gastric cancer. This trial assessed the efficacy, safety and feasibility of capecitabine in combination with docetaxel in patients with metastatic oesophageal cancer. In all, 24 patients with advanced disease (17 squamous cell carcinoma and seven adenocarcinoma) received oral capecitabine (1000 mg m(-2) twice daily on days 1-14) plus intravenous docetaxel (75 mg m(-2) on day 1) every 3 weeks as first- (n = 16) or second-line (n = 8) therapy. Patients received a median of four cycles of treatment (range, 0-6). The median follow-up is 16.5 months (range, 7.9-21.4 months). Intent-to-treat efficacy analysis showed an overall response rate of 46%. Of the 11 responders (one complete and 10 partial), nine of 16 (56%) received first-line and two of eight (25%) received second-line therapy. The median time to progression was 6.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 4.5-7.7 months). The median survival was 15.8 months (95% CI, 7.8-23.9 months). Severe adverse events (grade 3/4) reported were: neutropenia (42%, including febrile neutropenia 8%), hand-foot syndrome (29%), diarrhoea (13%), sensory neuropathy (13%), anaemia (8%) and fatigue (8%). Capecitabine plus docetaxel has a manageable adverse event profile and very promising activity in metastatic oesophageal cancer, at least comparable to other doublet regimens. Therefore, the combination merits further investigation in this setting.     

Capecitabine: expanding options for the treatment of patients with early or locally advanced breast cancer

Capecitabine has proven efficacy in metastatic breast cancer, extending survival in combination with docetaxel and offering a favorable safety profile, including minimal myelosuppression and alopecia, as a single agent. It is therefore logical that capecitabine could build on the improved outcomes achieved with taxanes in early breast cancer. In the neoadjuvant setting, a phase III trial of capecitabine and docetaxel (XT) versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) showed that XT was more effective than AC in terms of clinical response rate and pathologic complete response rate, with a manageable safety profile. Other studies, including a phase III trial of capecitabine, epirubicin, and docetaxel, a phase III trial of capecitabine and vinorelbine, and several phase II studies of different regimens with capecitabine, have confirmed the high activity of neoadjuvant capecitabine, with acceptable safety. In the adjuvant setting, a Finnish phase III study (FinXX) of sequential XT followed by cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and capecitabine versus docetaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide has shown favorable safety with lower doses of both capecitabine and docetaxel in the XT combination. Efficacy results from that trial are eagerly awaited. A large, ongoing trial program is continuing to explore the potential for capecitabine in the treatment of early breast cancer, looking at capecitabine-taxane combinations, capecitabine maintenance therapy, capecitabine for elderly patients, and sequential versus combination therapy, involving >20,000 patients.     

Superior survival with capecitabine plus docetaxel combination therapy in anthracycline-pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer: phase III trial results.

PURPOSE: Docetaxel and capecitabine, a tumor-activated oral fluoropyrimidine, show high single-agent efficacy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and synergy in preclinical studies. This international phase III trial compared efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine/docetaxel therapy with single-agent docetaxel in anthracycline-pretreated patients with MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to 21-day cycles of oral capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 to 14 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 (n = 255) or to docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 (n = 256). RESULTS: Capecitabine/docetaxel resulted in significantly superior efficacy in time to disease progression (TTP) (hazard ratio, 0.652; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.545 to 0.780; P =.0001; median, 6.1 v 4.2 months), overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.775; 95% CI, 0.634 to 0.947; P =.0126; median, 14.5 v 11.5 months), and objective tumor response rate (42% v 30%, P =.006) compared with docetaxel. Gastrointestinal side effects and hand-foot syndrome were more common with combination therapy, whereas myalgia, arthralgia, and neutropenic fever/sepsis were more common with single-agent docetaxel. More grade 3 adverse events occurred with combination therapy (71% v 49%, respectively), whereas grade 4 events were slightly more common with docetaxel (31% v 25% with combination). CONCLUSION: The significantly superior TTP and survival achieved with the addition of capecitabine to docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), with the manageable toxicity profile, indicate that this combination provides clear benefits over single-agent docetaxel 100 mg/m(2). Docetaxel/capecitabine therapy is an important treatment option for women with anthracycline-pretreated MBC.     

Detailed analysis of a randomized phase III trial: can the tolerability of capecitabine plus docetaxel be improved without compromising its survival advantage?

BACKGROUND: In a phase III trial, 3-weekly capecitabine (1250 mg/m(2) twice daily days 1-14) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) day 1) demonstrated significantly superior overall survival to 3-weekly docetaxel (100 mg/m(2) day 1). We report a retrospective analysis of the impact of capecitabine/docetaxel dose reduction on safety and efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Safety and efficacy data were analyzed retrospectively according to the actual doses of capecitabine and docetaxel administered. RESULTS: More patients receiving capecitabine/docetaxel (65%) had dose reductions for adverse events than docetaxel alone (35%). In most patients requiring dose reduction with the combination (80%), capecitabine and docetaxel were simultaneously reduced to 950 mg/m(2) and 55 mg/m(2), respectively. Subsequently, there were fewer cycles (17%) with grade 3/4 adverse events than with the full doses (34%). Time to progression and overall survival appeared to be similar in patients starting the second cycle with reduced doses of capecitabine/docetaxel and those who continued to receive full doses of capecitabine/docetaxel for at least the first four cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine/docetaxel dosing flexibility allows management of side-effects without compromising efficacy. This retrospective analysis, as well as multiple phase II studies of taxanes with reduced-dose capecitabine, shows that reducing the starting dose of capecitabine with docetaxel is a reasonable strategy for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. In addition, reducing the dose of both agents may be appropriate.     

The clinical efficacy of cytotoxic agents in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with an anthracycline and a taxane: A systematic review

IntroductionCurrently available evidence does not provide definitive guidance regarding the optimal chemotherapy agents and combinations in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated advanced breast cancer. We performed a systematic review of controlled clinical trials of the cytotoxic agents currently used for this population in Europe: capecitabine, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, docetaxel, paclitaxel and paclitaxel protein-bound particles.MethodA systematic review of randomised (RCT) and non-randomised controlled clinical trials (non-RCTs). The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes were duration of response (DR), overall response rate (ORR), adverse events and quality of life (QoL). Six electronic databases and grey literature sources were searched; reference tracking was performed on included publications. A narrative synthesis was conducted: heterogeneity of study design and interventions prevented meta-analysis.ResultsNo randomised controlled trial (RCT) found any significant differences between any of the regimens in terms of OS. In terms of PFS, only gemcitabine plus vinorelbine performed significantly better than its comparator, vinorelbine alone. For secondary outcomes, only capecitabine plus bevacizumab had a significantly better outcome than its comparator, capecitabine alone, in terms of ORR. A low quality non-RCT found that both capecitabine monotherapy and a combination of capecitabine plus vinorelbine were significantly more effective than vinorelbine alone in terms of OS and ORR. Across all trials, median OS for these patients typically remained less than 16 months.ConclusionThe quantity and quality of the available evidence regarding the efficacy of the particular chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with an anthracycline and a taxane is extremely limited. New effective therapies are sorely needed in this population.