Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strengths of Different Core Materials with Various Luting Agents Used for Cast Crown Restorations

The coronal cast restoration continues to be used commonly to restore mutilated, endodontically treated teeth. The tensile bond strength of luting cements is of critical importance as many of failures are at the core and the crown interface. An invitro study with aim to evaluate and compare bond strengths of luting cements between different core materials and cast crowns. A total of 45 extracted identical mandibular second premolars were endodontically treated and divided into 3 groups of 15 each. Specimens in first group were restored with cast post and core (Group C), and specimens in second group were restored with stainless steel parapost and composite core material (Group B) and specimens in third group were restored with stainless steel parapost and glass ionomer core build (Group G). Standardized crown preparation was done for all the specimens to receive cast crowns. Each group was further divided into 3 subgroups and were cemented using 3 different luting cements namely, resin cement, polycarboxylate cement, glass ionomer cement (Type I). The samples of each subgroup (n = 5) were subjected to tensile testing using Universal Testing Machine at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min till the dislodgement of crown from the core surface was observed. The bond strengths were significantly different according one way ANOVA (F-150.76 and p < 0.0000). The results of the study showed that the specimens cemented with resin cement in cast core, composite core and glass ionomer core exhibited significantly higher bond strengths as compared to specimens cemented with glass ionomer and polycarboxylate cement. Composite resin core and resin cement combinations were superior to all other cement and core combinations tested.     

The effect of thermal stress on the marginal seal of cast gold full crowns

An experiment was conducted to observe the effect of fluctuations in temperature on the marginal seal of full veneer cast gold crowns. Forty crowns were fabricated and allotted into two groups of 20 crowns each. One group was cemented with zinc phosphate and the other group, with zinc polycarboxylate cement. Ten crowns from each group were subjected to thermal stress of fluctuating temperatures (4 and 60 C) and the remaining ten crowns from each group were held at the constant temperature of 37 +/- 1 C. The experiment demonstrated the following results: --Microleakage was evident in all groups. --The degree of microleakage with zinc phosphate was less than with zinc polycarboxylate cement. --Contrary to the claim that zinc polycarboxylate cement adheres to enamel through chelation, we were unable to observe better results. The degree of penetration of dye in the tooth-cement interfaces of crowns cemented with zinc polycarboxylate was not less despite the remaining layers of enamel for bonding. The cause of microleakage with cast gold restorations is apparently multifactorial. Research should formulate a luting agent which forms a strong bond to gold alloy and tooth substrate and has a high tensile and shearing strength.     

In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: In contrast to gold crowns, in vitro determination of the retentive strength of all-ceramic crowns is more difficult because components allowing connection to testing apparatus are not as easily integrated into the all-ceramic material. Nevertheless, retentive strength data are crucial for obtaining information about the potential clinical performance of luting cements for all-ceramic restorations. Therefore, a new in vitro model was necessary to evaluate the retentive strength of all-ceramic crowns. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the retentive strength of 4 resin-cement systems, a compomer, a glass-ionomer cement, a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement, and a self-adhesive resin for luting zirconium oxide ceramic crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One-hundred-twenty extracted human teeth were randomly divided into 12 groups (n = 10) and prepared in a standardized manner (5-degree taper, 3-mm occlusogingival height). All-ceramic crowns (Lava) were fabricated in a standardized manner for each tooth. The following cements and corresponding bonding regimens were used to lute the crowns to the teeth according to manufacturers' recommendations: CO, Compolute/EBS Multi; CO/RT, Compolute/EBS Multi/Rocatec; CB, Superbond C and B; CB/RT, Superbond C and B/Rocatec; CB/PL, Superbond C&B/Porcelain Liner M; PA, Panavia F; DC, Dyract Cem Plus/Xeno III; CH/PL, Chemiace II/Porcelain Liner M; RL, RelyX Luting, K/C, Ketac Cem/Ketac Conditioner; K, Ketac Cem; and RU, RelyX Unicem. After thermal cycling (5000 cycles, 5 degrees C-55 degrees C), the outer surfaces of the cemented zirconium oxide ceramic crowns were treated (Rocatec) to improve bonding and then placed into a low-shrinkage epoxy resin block (Paladur). The block/crown and tooth components for each specimen were connected to opposing ends of a universal testing machine so that crown retention could be measured. Crowns were removed from teeth along their path of insertion. The retentive surface area (mm 2 ) was determined individually for each tooth. Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon exact test, (alpha =.05) and a Bonferroni correction (alpha =.001). RESULTS: The median (minimum/maximum) retentive strength values (MPa) were as follows: CO, 1.7 (0.6/4.3); CO/RT, 3.0 (1.3/5.4); CB, 4.8 (3.7/7.9); CB/RT, 8.1 (4.2/12.7); CB/PL, 5.3 (3.7/10.2); PA, 4.0 (3.3/5.1); DC, 3.3 (2.1/5.6); CH/PL, 4.0 (1.3/6.3); RL, 4.7 (2.8/6.6); K/C, 1.8 (0.6/2.3); K, 1.9 (0.2/4.5); and RU, 4.8 (2.5/6.7). Superbond C&B (+ Rocatec) specimens showed the highest median retentive strength, but were not significantly different from Superbond C&B without Rocatec pretreatment of the all-ceramic crown's inner surface. Compolute specimens also did not benefit significantly from the Rocatec pretreatment. Within the materials used without pretreatment of the ceramic, Superbond C&B, Panavia, Dyract Cem Plus, RelyX Luting, and RelyX Unicem showed the highest median retentive strength values and were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Within the conditions of this study, the compomer-cement, the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement, and the self-adhesive resin luting agent had the same level of retentive quality as the resin luting agents, Superbond C&B, and Panavia. Rocatec pretreatment of the ceramic surface did not improve the retentive strengths of Compolute and Superbond C&B.     

Influence of types and surface treatment of dental alloy and film thickness of cements on bond strength of dental luting cements

The goal of this study was to test the influence of the type and oxidation treatment of dental casting alloys on the tensile bond strength of luting cements. Also, the influence of film thickness of luting cements on the tensile bond strength of different dental casting alloys was examined. Four different luting cements (zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate, glass ionomer and adhesive resin cements) and four different dental casting alloys (Au-Ag-Cu, Ag-Pd, hardened Ag-Pd and Ni-Cr alloys) were used. Cylindrical alloy rods for the tensile bond strength test were casted, and then, top surfaces of the rods were cemented with each luting cement to the bottom surfaces of other rods, using the film thickness adjustment apparatus. The film thickness of luting cement was adjusted to 20, 30, 50, 75 or 100 microns. The tensile bond strengths of each cement to different casting alloys at each film thickness were measured one day after the rods had been cemented. The tensile bond strength of the zinc phosphate cement could not be determined in this study due to the separation of the alloy rods cemented with the zinc phosphate cement in water before the tensile test. The tensile bond strength to the adhesive resin cement to any alloy showed the greatest strength; however, that of the glass ionomer cement to any alloy was the lowest strength among the cements examined. The Ni-Cr alloy had the highest bond strength of any luting cement, compared to other alloys. The tensile bond strengths of luting cements significantly decreased with the increase in film thickness of cement layer. The adhesive resin cement had the greatest bond strength, and the glass ionomer cement was the lowest bond strength at any film thickness. The oxidation treatment significantly increased the bond strength of the adhesive resin cement to both Au-Ag-Cu and Ag-Pd alloys. The tensile bond strength of the adhesive resin cement was most dependent upon the film thickness of cement layer, and that of the polycarboxylate cement was least dependent upon the film thickness of cement layer among the cements examined. In addition, the oxidation treatment for precious alloys could be a factor contributing to the increase in the bond strength of the adhesive resin cement.     

An evaluation of a glass ionomer luting agent: pulpal histological response

Pulpal histological response after crown cementation with a glass ionomer luting agent was evaluated and compared with the response to a polycarboxylate cement or a varnish plus zinc phosphate cement. Pulpal histological response was evaluated on teeth that had full crowns cemented with the test luting agents 3, 10, and 56 days after cementation. No statistically significant differences were found in pulpal histological response between the materials tested during all periods. These findings suggest that factors other than pulpal inflammation are contributing to the reported hypersensitivity after cementation associated with glass ionomer luting agents.     

Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the bond strength of some resin luting cements to zirconia ceramic. The hypothesis was that adhesive bonding capacity is influenced by different surface pretreatments designed for milled ceramic inlays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Composite cylinders 5 mm x 5 mm were light cured on the ceramic surfaces for a shear test conducted in a test jig. Five surface treatments were studied: as received (from the milling machine), sandblasting with either 250- or 50-micron alumina sand, hydrofluoric acid treatment, and grinding with diamond burs. The tested luting cements were Panavia 21, Twinlook, and Superbond C&B. RESULTS: All debonding occurred at the interface between ceramic and composite cement. Superbond demonstrated the highest bond strength regardless of the surface treatments. Grinding the surface with diamond burs improved the bonding slightly for Twinlook and Panavia 21 and also showed the roughest texture. Washing with hydrofluoric acid had no significant influence on bond strength. CONCLUSION: Bond strengths for Twinlook and Pananvia 21 were quite low, and only Superbond showed a bond strength reasonably acceptable for clinical use; however, as no standard for bond strength has been established for inlay therapy, the other cements cannot be rejected as luting cements for inlays.     

三种树脂粘接剂对可切削复合树脂与牙本质粘接强度的比较研究

目的 通过比较3种树脂粘接剂对聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯-纳米二氧化硅-二氧化锆(polymethylmecrylate/nano SiO2-ZrO2,PNSZ)可切削复合树脂与牙本质的粘接强度的差异,寻找适合PNSZ可切削复合树脂的树脂粘接剂,为临床应用提供参考.方法 使用树脂粘接剂A(RelyX ARC)、B(Panavia-F)和c(Variolink II)粘接PNSZ可切削复合树脂与牙本质,测试剪切粘接强度和微拉伸粘接强度(各分为A、B、C 3组,每组10个试件),并采用50倍立体显微镜观察断裂模式.结果 剪切测试中A、B、C组试件的粘接强度分别为(14.07±4.67)、(13.17±4.63)、(12.10±2.18)MPa,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);微拉伸测试中A、B、C组试件的粘接强度分别为(11.49±4.90)、(9.66±4.15)、(10.11±4.20)MPa,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).立体显微镜观察显示,3种粘接剂的断裂模式均以牙本质-粘接剂界面的断裂为主.结论 3种树脂粘接剂对PNSZ可切削复合树脂与牙本质的粘接效果相近.PNSZ可切削复合树脂一粘接剂界面的粘接优于牙本质-粘接剂界面.     

Leakage of various types of luting agents

Freshly extracted molar teeth were prepared for complete cast gold crowns cemented with either zinc phosphate cement, polycarboxylate cement, glass ionomer cement, a resin luting agent, or a zinc oxide-eugenol temporary cement. The specimens were tested at 1-, 6-, and 12-month intervals with radioactive 45Ca. The specimens were sectioned, autoradiographs were made, and the marginal leakage was evaluated on a scale of 0 to 3. The results showed that zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate, and glass ionomer cements are equally suited for permanent cementation of restorations. The resin luting agent showed high initial leakage, indicating that it is not as desirable for permanent cementation purposes. The zinc oxide-eugenol cement showed increased leakage with time but is well suited for its indicated purpose, temporary cementation.     

Influence of different adhesive resin cements on the fracture strength of aluminum oxide ceramic posterior crowns

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The influence of different types of adhesive resin cements on the long-term prognosis of aluminum oxide ceramic posterior crowns is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of aluminum oxide ceramic on maxillary posterior crowns cemented with different resin luting agents before and after cyclic thermomechanical loading. Material and methods Forty-eight maxillary first molars were prepared and restored with standardized aluminum oxide ceramic (In-Ceram Alumina) crowns. The test specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=16). The crowns were luted with an acrylic resin cement (Super-Bond C&B, control, Group SB) and 2 composite luting agents (Panavia F, Group PV; and Rely X Unicem, Group RX). Half of the specimens were exposed to thermomechanical fatigue in a masticatory simulator. All specimens were tested for fracture strength (N) using quasistatic loading. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare the fracture strength (alpha=.05). RESULTS: All specimens survived the exposure to the simulator. The following median fracture strength values were obtained without/with thermomechanical fatigue loading: Group SB, 2726 N/2673 N; Group PV, 2520 N/2083 N; and Group RX, 2036 N/2369 N. The fracture strength in Group PV after thermomechanical fatigue loading was significantly lower compared to the fracture strength in Group PV without artificial aging (P =.016), as well as significantly lower compared to Group SB with artificial aging (P =.003). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, all tested cements are capable of successfully luting aluminum oxide ceramic crowns. The fracture strength of Group PV after artificial aging was comparatively low.     

Assessing the performance of a methyl methacrylate-based resin cement with self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets

Questions over the usefulness of a self-etching primer with resin adhesive in the bonding of orthodontic brackets remain unsolved. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of using Multibond, a new methyl methacrylate (MMA)-based resin cement with self-etching primer, on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets compared with Superbond C&B, which is a well-known MMA-based resin cement containing phosphoric acid etching. Metal or plastic brackets were bonded to etched or self-etching primed bovine teeth using Superbond C&B or Multibond. The shear bond strengths were measured after immersion in water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Scheffe's test. The surface appearances of the teeth after phosphoric acid etching or self-etching priming were observed by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Metal brackets bonded with Multibond had a significantly lower shear bond strength than metal brackets bonded with Superbond C&B. No significant differences in shear bond strength were observed between Multibond and Superbond C&B when plastic brackets were bonded to the enamel. The shear bond strength of metal brackets bonded with Multibond was comparable with that of plastic brackets bonded with Superbond C&B. Adhesive remnant index score showed a tendency of more residual resin cement remaining on the teeth when metal brackets were bonded with Multibond. FE-SEM observation revealed less dissolution of the enamel surface resulting from treatment with Multibond self-etching primer as compared with phosphoric acid. Thus, the Multibond system may be a candidate for bonding orthodontic brackets with the advantage of minimizing enamel loss.     

2种粘结剂及粘结方法对CAD/CAM全瓷冠抗折强度的影响

目的 研究不同粘结方法及冷热循环对Cerec全瓷冠粘结后抗折强度的影响。 方法 选择离体前磨牙80颗,进行Cerec全瓷冠预备及制作。随机分为1~4组,每组20颗,分别使用Variolink N树脂粘结剂+硅烷偶联剂粘结、Variolink N树脂粘结剂粘结、Bisco Choice TM 2树脂粘结剂＋硅烷偶联剂粘结、Bisco Choice TM 2树脂粘结剂粘结;每组再分为A、B小组,分别不进行和进行冷热循环。8组试件均用万能力学实验机测试其全瓷冠最大抗折裂强度,观察所有标本粘结破坏形式;进行统计分析。 结果 使用Variolink N树脂粘结剂+硅烷偶联剂组粘结的Cerec全瓷冠抗折裂强度最高;全瓷冠抗折强度A组(非冷热循环)高于B组。差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论 双重固化树脂粘结系统是牙科长石质陶瓷粘结的理想选择,可以获得较高的抗折裂强度。冷热循环降低Cerec全瓷冠抗折裂强度。     

An evaluation of a glass ionomer luting agent: bacterial leakage

This study quantitatively evaluates the bacterial leakage beneath crowns cemented with a glass ionomer cement compared with those cemented with a polycarboxylate cement or a varnish plus zinc phosphate cement. Bacterial samples were taken from beneath full crowns cemented with the test luting agents 3, 10, and 56 days after cementation. Two-way analysis of variance of the resultant data showed a significant increase in bacterial counts for zinc phosphate, a significant decrease for polycarboxylate, and no change for glass ionomer. These findings suggest that bacterial leakage may not be the reason for the reported poor clinical response associated with glass ionomer luting agents.     

釉质-树脂-金属粘结系统粘结强度对比研究

目的　比较粘结剂的粘结强度以指导临床粘结桥修复治疗。方法　用三种粘结剂将 48颗离体牙与镍 -铬合金粘结 ,生理盐水中储存 72小时后测量抗拉及抗剪切粘结强度。结果　All-Bond 2的抗拉强度明显高于SuperbondC&B ,剪切向强度无明显差别。DM正畸釉质粘结剂的抗剪切强度最高 ,抗拉强度明显高于SuperbondC&B ,与All-Bond 2无明显差别。 结论　All-Bond 2的综合粘结效果好于SuperbondC&B ;DM釉质粘结剂粘结效果较好 ,建议临床使用     

Effect of endodontic sealer and resin luting strategies on pull-out bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of eugenol-containing endodontic sealers and luting strategy on the pull-out bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin. Sixty-four bovine incisors were randomly assigned into two groups of 32 specimens each for obturation procedure with gutta-percha only, or with Pulp Canal Sealer EWT Subsequently, the roots were prepared for the fiber post Reforpost and all specimens of each endodontic sealing procedure were allocated to four groups (n = 8), according to the strategies for post cementation: A) Single Bond 2 and RelyX ARC; B) All Bond 2 and C&B cement; C) All Bond 2 and RelyX ARC; D) Single Bond 2 and C&B Cement. The posts were cemented immediately after the endodontic treatment. The pull-out test was performed at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min in a universal testing machine (EMIC). Data (Kgf) were submitted to a two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (p < or = 0.05). The eugenol-based sealer did not influence the pull-out bond strength of fiber posts regardless of the luting strategy. RelyX ARC showed higher bond strength than C&B Cement when used with Single Bond 2 adhesive system, when the eugenol-based sealer was present. All Bond 2, when associated to all cements studied, promoted similar bond strength, regardless of the eugenol-containing endodontic sealer In conclusion, eugenol-containing sealer did not influence the pull-out bond strength values of the resin luting systems for glass fiber post cementation. The bond system and resin cement association from the same manufacturer had similar bond strength values for dentin.     

4种玻璃离子水门汀对ITI基台与金属内冠之间粘接力的比较研究

目的：研究4种玻璃离子类水门汀对ITI种植系统标准颈粘接固位基台和金属内冠之间的粘接力。方法将10只金属内冠与10只I T I标准颈粘接固位基台分别使用以下4种水门汀进行交叉粘固：A组为玻璃离子水门汀（日本）;B组为树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀（美国）;C组为暂时粘固用玻璃离子水门汀（日本）;D组为玻璃离子水门汀（德国）;粘固后测试并记录样本粘接力（N）,同时观察并记录粘固界面的断裂模式,最后,对粘接力进行统计学处理。所有内冠和基台经清洗后重复使用。结果4种水门汀的粘接力及由大至小的排列顺序为C组（183.6±29.4） N〉D组（153.4±36.2） N〉B组（144.4±41.1） N〉A组（109.9±25.7）N,其中C组的粘接力最高,A组的粘接力最低,A组显著低于其它3种水门汀（P〈0.05）。对样本的断裂面观察显示,A组和D组样本断裂面发生在水门汀和基台表面之间,而B组和C组样本的断裂面则呈现混合断裂的模式。结论2种玻璃离子水门汀和树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀都具有临床可接受的粘接力,而暂时粘固用玻璃离子水门汀因粘接力太大,不适用对种植牙冠进行暂时粘固。     

Comparison of the tensile bond strengths of cast metal crowns luted with resin cements

The limitation of photoactivation of dual-polymerized resin cements along the margins of metal restorations may adversely affect the mechanical properties of these cements, thus impairing the retention of restorations. The aim of this study was to assess the bond strength of cast metal crowns cemented with three dual-polymerized resin cements, using a chemically-activated resin cement and zinc phosphate as controls. Fifty nickel-chromium alloy crowns were cast and randomly assigned to five groups of equal size. Castings were cemented on their corresponding metal dies with one of the tested luting agents: Scotchbond Resin Cement, Enforce and Panavia F (dual-polymerized resin cements), Cement-It (chemically-activated resin cement) and Zinc Phosphate Cement (zinc phosphate cement). Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 h and then loaded in tension until failure. Panavia F and Zinc Phosphate Cement provided the highest and lowest bond strength means, respectively. Scotchbond Resin Cement, Enforce and Cement-It cements exhibited similar intermediate values, but with statistically significant difference compared to the other materials (P < 0.05). Even with the restriction or absence of light activation, all tested dual-polymerized resin cements produced significantly higher bond strength than did the zinc phosphate cement and yielded similar or better results than the chemically activated cement. It should be pointed out that the findings of this study relate to a test scenario which does not mimic clinical circumstances and that further work is required to identify the clinical significance of the reported tensile bond strength differences between the different luting materials.     

Seating and retention of complete crowns with a new adhesive resin cement.

The retentive property of cast gold complete crowns cemented with an adhesive resin cement (Panavia Ex) was compared with retention of crowns cemented with zinc phosphate cement (Flecks) and the conventional resin cement (Comspan). The effect of these agents on seating of crowns also was evaluated. Panavia cement exhibited the highest retentive strength, with values almost twice those obtained with zinc phosphate cement. However, the difference in mean retention values of crowns cemented with Comspan cement or with zinc phosphate cement was not statistically significant. Both resin cements used in this study provided better seating of crowns than did zinc phosphate cement.     

不同粘固剂对全瓷冠边缘完整性影响的研究

目的研究不同粘固剂粘固的全瓷冠边缘完整性。方法全瓷冠修复24颗离体上颌第三磨牙,随机分成3组,每组8个,分别用自酸蚀树脂粘接系统、Compomer粘固剂和磷酸锌粘固剂粘固,用扫描电镜观测标本牙疲劳试验前后边缘完整性及粘固剂表面质量。结果自酸蚀树脂粘接组试验前后完整边缘率均高于95%,Compomer组和磷酸锌粘固剂粘固组完整边缘率分别为16%~19%和5%,组间均有显著性差异（P〈0.001）;自酸蚀树脂粘接组边缘区粘固剂缺损显著小于其它两组（P〈0.05）。结论用自酸蚀树脂粘接系统粘固全瓷冠有优良的边缘完整性和边缘区表面质量。     

Acidity of conventional luting cements and their diffusion through bovine dentine

AIM: To examine the changes in pH of luting cements and acid diffusion of luting cements through bovine dentine using a pH-imaging microscope (SCHEM-100; Horiba Ltd, Kyoto, Japan). METHODOLOGY: The pH of the surface of three conventional luting cements, glass-ionomer, zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate was measured with SCHEM-100 for 1 month. The acid diffusion from the three luting cements through bovine dentine was investigated by measuring pH changes during the application of each luting cement on the bovine dentine surface. Coronal bovine dentine disks were prepared to thicknesses of 0.50 and 0.25 mm. Each luting cement was placed on the labial dentine surface, and the pH change of the pulpal surface was observed every 3 min for 30 min with SCHEM-100. RESULTS: Glass-ionomer showed the lowest pH values for longer times. Neutralization proceeded furthest in zinc polycarboxylate. The 0.5-mm-thick dentine disks showed no pH change on the pulpal side with all the three cements. The 0.25-mm-thick disks revealed evidence of acid diffusion on the pulpal side of the cemented dentine and significantly lower pH when cemented with glass-ionomer and zinc phosphate than with zinc polycarboxylates. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that glass-ionomer exhibited a lower setting pH than zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate, and acid diffusions from glass-ionomer and zinc phosphate cements were observed when placed on 0.25-mm-thick dentine disks.     

不同粘接剂对二氧化锆桩固位力的影响

目的探讨不同粘接剂对二氧化锆桩与根管内牙本质粘接强度的影响。方法将60颗完整无龋坏的离体上颌中切牙自釉牙骨质界处截断牙冠,根管桩道预备,制作二氧化锆桩核。60颗牙随机分为6组,分别用磷酸锌水门汀、聚羧酸锌水门汀、玻璃离子水门汀i、Bond加LuxaCore双固化树脂、RelyX Unicem树脂、32%磷酸加ESPE RelyX Unicem树脂粘固二氧化锆桩核。万能力学试验机进行推出测试,记录粘接强度,并对数据行统计学分析。结果 32%磷酸加ESPE RelyX Unicem树脂组、ESPE RelyX Unicem树脂组i、Bond加Luxa Core树脂组、聚羧酸锌水门汀组、玻璃离子水门汀组、磷酸锌水门汀组的二氧化锆桩粘接强度分别为（15.06±1.80）MPa、（11.57±1.33）MPa（、10.42±1.24）MPa（、7.30±1.05）MPa（、6.99±0.87）MPa（、3.97±0.95）MPa,固位力依次降低。其中32%磷酸加ESPE RelyX Unicem树脂组的固位力显著高于其他组,两两比较差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;ESPE RelyX Unicem树脂组与Luxa Core树脂组之间（P=0.590）,聚羧酸锌组和玻璃离子组之间（P=0.490）的差异均无统计学意义;磷酸锌水门汀的粘接强度最低,与其它组比较差异均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论临床粘固二氧化锆桩,树脂类粘接剂固位力较强,自粘接系统加用酸蚀技术可以显著提高二氧化锆桩在根管内的粘接强度。