Threshold-dependent variability of coronary artery calcification measurements -- implications for contrast-enhanced multi-detector row-computed tomography

INTRODUCTION: The present study investigated the threshold-dependent variability of coronary artery calcification (CAC) measurements and the potential to quantify CAC in contrast-enhanced multi-detector row-computed tomography (MDCT). METHODS: We compared the mean CT attenuation of CAC to luminal contrast enhancement of the coronary arteries in 30 patients (n = 30) undergoing standard coronary contrast-enhanced spiral MDCT. The modified Agatston score [AS], calcified plaque volume [CV], and mineral mass [MM]) at four different thresholds (130, 200, 300, and 400 HU) were measured in 50 patients who underwent non-contrast-enhanced MDCT. RESULTS: Mean CT attenuation of CAC was similar to the attenuation of the contrast-enhanced coronary lumen (CAC 297.1 +/- 68.7 HU versus 295 +/- 65 HU (p < 0.0001), respectively). Above a threshold of 300 HU CAC measurements significantly varied to standard measurements obtained at a threshold of 130 HU (p < 0.0001). The threshold-dependent variation of MM measurements was significantly smaller than for AS and CV (130 HU versus 400 HU: 63, 75, and 81, respectively; p < 0.001). These differences resulted in a change of age and gender based percentile category for AS in 78% of subjects. DISCUSSION: We demonstrated that CAC measurements are threshold dependent with MM measurements having significantly less variation than AS or CV. Due to the similarity of mean CT attenuation of CAC and the contrast-enhanced coronary lumen accurate quantification of CAC may be difficult in standard coronary contrast-enhanced spiral MDCT.     

Concordance of coronary artery calcium estimates between MDCT and electron beam tomography

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare MDCT with electron beam tomography (EBT) for the quantification of coronary artery calcification (CAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight patients underwent both MDCT and EBT within 2 months for the quantification of CAC. The images were scored in a blinded fashion and independently by two observers with a minimum of 7 days between the interpretations of images obtained from one scanner type to the other. RESULTS: Presence versus absence of CAC was discordant by EBT versus MDCT in 6% (n = 4) of the cases by observer 1, with one of these cases also discordant by observer 2. All cases except one (aortic calcium misidentified as CAC) were among those with a mean Agatston score of less than 5 present on EBT but absent on MDCT. EBT and MDCT scores correlated well (r = 0.98-0.99). The relative median variability between EBT and MDCT for the Agatston score was 24% for observer 1 and 27% for observer 2 and was 18% and 14%, respectively, for volume score (average for both observers: 27% for Agatston score and 16% for volume score). Scores were higher for EBT than MDCT in approximately half of the cases, with little systematic difference between the two (median EBT-MDCT difference: Agatston score, -0.55; volume score, 3.4 mm3). The absolute median difference averaged for the two observers was 28.75 for the Agatston score and 15.4 mm3 for the volume score. CONCLUSION: Differences in CAC measurements using EBT and MDCT are similar to interscan differences in CAC measurements previously reported for EBT or for other MDCT scanners individually.     

Coronary artery calcium: accuracy and reproducibility of measurements with multi-detector row CT--assessment of effects of different thresholds and quantification methods

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of different thresholds and quantification methods on the accuracy and reproducibility of coronary calcium measurements with multi-detector row computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cardiac CT phantom containing predetermined calcified cylinders was scanned. Calcium volume and mass were measured at various threshold values ranging from 80 to 230 HU. In 32 patients, two consecutive CT scans were obtained, and the coronary artery calcium score, volume, and mass were measured by one observer at 130- and 90-HU thresholds. Correlation analysis and analysis of variance were performed to evaluate the measurement errors in the phantom study and the interscan variability in the clinical study. RESULTS: In the phantom, mass measurement error varied with threshold and calcium density (P <.01). Mass error was strongly correlated with volume error (r = 0.91, P <.01) but with a much smaller range. In the clinical study, interscan variability of mass measurements was significantly lower than that with other measurement methods for both patients and individual vessels. For the patients, the mean interscan variability of calcium score, volume, and mass at the 130-HU threshold was 20.4%, 13.9%, and 9.3%, respectively. For all methods, interscan variability was not significantly different between the 130- and 90-HU thresholds (P >.05). CONCLUSION: The mass measurement is more accurate, less variable, and more reproducible in coronary calcium quantification than are measurements with other algorithms. Accurate quantification of calcium in each calcified plaque may require that the threshold be set individually, depending on the calcium density.     

Influence of scoring parameter settings on Agatston and volume scores for coronary calcification

Current multi-detector CT and electron beam tomography (EBT) technology enables the evaluation of coronary calcification. Multiple software packages are available to quantify calcification using several scoring algorithms implementing user-definable scoring parameters. We investigated the effect of scoring parameters on the calcium score outcome. Three parameters (four-connected or eight-connected, lesion size threshold and interpolation) are evaluated. Their theoretical influence on the scoring outcome is shown using simplified examples. To evaluate the effect in real data, we performed calcium scoring on randomly chosen EBT scans from 50 participants in an epidemiological study. Both the Agatston and volume scores were calculated. Changing from eight-connected to four-connected connectivity decreased both Agatston and volume scores (mean variability Agatston 3.15% and volume score –3.52%). Decreasing the threshold from 4 to 2 pixels increased the calcium scores because smaller lesions were also selected as calcified plaques (mean variability Agatston 16.23% and volume score 18.66%). Finally, the use of interpolation had a large negative effect on the volume score (mean variability –29.67%) and almost no effect on the Agatston score. Parameter settings in software for quantification for coronary calcification affect the calcium score outcome. Therefore, parameter settings for calcium scoring should be standardized.     

Quantitative evaluation of calcium (content) in the coronary artery using hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) algorithm on low-dose 64-detector CT: comparison of iDose and filtered back projection

To evaluate the usefulness of hybrid iterative reconstruction (iDose) for quantification of calcium content in the coronary artery on 64-detector computed tomography (CT), an anthropomorphic cardiac CT phantom containing cylinders with known calcium content was scanned at tube current-time products of 15, 20, 25, and 50 mAs using 64-detector CT. The images obtained at 15, 20, 25, and 50 mAs were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP), and those at 15, 20, and 25 mAs were also reconstructed using iDose. Then the volume and mass of the calcium content in the cylinders were calculated and compared with the true values. The Agatston score was also evaluated. The Agatston score and mass of calcium obtained at 50 mAs using FBP were 656.92 and 159.91 mg, respectively. In contrast, those obtained at 25 mAs using iDose were 641.91 and 159.05 mg, respectively. No significant differences were found in the calcium measurements obtained using FBP and iDose. In addition, the Agatston score and mass of calcium obtained at 15 mAs and 20 mAs using iDose were not significantly different from those obtained at 25 mAs with iDose. By using iDose, accurate quantification of calcium in the coronary artery can be achieved at 15 mAs using 64-detector CT. The radiation dose can be significantly reduced in coronary artery calcium scoring without impairing the detection and quantification of coronary calcification.     

Potential clinical impact of variability in the measurement of coronary artery calcification with sequential MDCT

OBJECTIVE: The potential clinical impact of variability in the measurement of coronary artery calcification with sequential MDCT was evaluated using Agatston, volume, and mass scoring algorithms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients were imaged twice using an identical prospectively ECG-triggered sequential scanning protocol. The Agatston, volume, and mass scores were computed by two observers independently. In addition, a patient's total Agatston score was referenced to an age- and sex-stratified database to determine a percentile ranking. Interscan, interobserver, and intraobserver variability and the resultant impact on patients' risk stratifications were assessed. RESULTS: Significant interscan differences were found for all mean coronary calcium scores (Wilcoxson's signed rank test, p <0.0001). Although the median percentage of interscan variability was low for all scoring methods, the interquartile range was wide, indicating significant variability in the data. Median scores (lower quartile-upper quartile) for observers 1 and 2, respectively, were as follows: Agatston, 5% (0-79%) and 6% (0-83%); volume, 12% (0-51%) and 12% (0-57%); and mass, 14% (0-57%) and 14% (0-58%). Interobserver and intraobserver differences between mean calcium scores were not significant, and consequently, lower interobserver and intraobserver variabilities (narrow interquartile ranges of 0-5%) were observed for all scores. Despite significant interscan differences in calcium scores, the percentile ranking assigned to the two scans differed in only 13% of patients. Interobserver differences resulted in a change in the percentile ranking in 7-9% of patients, whereas intraobserver differences caused a change in only 5% of patients. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of sequential MDCT for coronary calcium quantification is sufficient in most cases for stratification of patient risk.     

Coronary artery calcium: a multi-institutional, multimanufacturer international standard for quantification at cardiac CT

PURPOSE: To develop a consensus standard for quantification of coronary artery calcium (CAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A standard for CAC quantification was developed by a multi-institutional, multimanufacturer international consortium of cardiac radiologists, medical physicists, and industry representatives. This report specifically describes the standardization of scan acquisition and reconstruction parameters, the use of patient size-specific tube current values to achieve a prescribed image noise, and the use of the calcium mass score to eliminate scanner- and patient size-based variations. An anthropomorphic phantom containing calibration inserts and additional phantom rings were used to simulate small, medium-size, and large patients. The three phantoms were scanned by using the recommended protocols for various computed tomography (CT) systems to determine the calibration factors that relate measured CT numbers to calcium hydroxyapatite density and to determine the tube current values that yield comparable noise values. Calculation of the calcium mass score was standardized, and the variance in Agatston, volume, and mass scores was compared among CT systems. RESULTS: Use of the recommended scanning parameters resulted in similar noise for small, medium-size, and large phantoms with all multi-detector row CT scanners. Volume scores had greater interscanner variance than did Agatston and calcium mass scores. Use of a fixed calcium hydroxyapatite density threshold (100 mg/cm(3)), as compared with use of a fixed CT number threshold (130 HU), reduced interscanner variability in Agatston and calcium mass scores. With use of a density segmentation threshold, the calcium mass score had the smallest variance as a function of patient size. CONCLUSION: Standardized quantification of CAC yielded comparable image noise, spatial resolution, and mass scores among different patient sizes and different CT systems and facilitated reduced radiation dose for small and medium-size patients.     

Reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in repeat examinations with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT

High reproducibility is a key requirement for coronary calcium scoring in follow-up examinations. We investigated the inter-examination reproducibility of calcium scoring with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT (MSCT). Fifty patients were examined twice with MSCT. Slices were reconstructed with retrospective ECG gating in the diastolic phase with 3-mm slice width and up to 125-ms temporal resolution. We calculated the Agatston score, calcium volume with and without isotropic interpolation, and calcium mass, and derived the mean and median variability. We investigated the change of variability with use of 3-mm non-overlapping and overlapping increments (2, 1.5, 1 mm). Use of overlapping increment results in considerably reduced interscan variability. We observed a minimum mean variability of 12% and a minimum median variability of 9% for the Agatston score. For volume and mass quantification we obtained a minimum mean variability of 7.5% and a minimum median variability of 5%. Multisection spiral CT enables coronary calcium quantification with high reproducibility in follow-up examinations mainly founded on image data with reduced partial-volume errors due to overlapping increment.     

Coronary artery calcium scoring with multislice computed tomography: in vitro assessment of a low tube voltage protocol

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare an 80-kVp coronary calcium scoring protocol with the standard protocol of 120 kVp in terms of accuracy and reproducibility and to assess its dose reduction potential. MATERIALS AND METHOD: An anthropomorphic heart phantom with calcium cylinders was scanned with different tube currents at 80 kVp and 120 kVp using a 16-slice multislice CT (MSCT) scanner. An adapted threshold for 80 kVp was calculated. Accuracy and reproducibility for calcium mass, volume, and Agatston score were analyzed using F-tests. The radiation doses needed to produce artifact-free images were determined. RESULTS: Accuracy (measurement errors: mass 120 kVp +4.6%, mass 80 kVp -6.9%, volume 120 kVp +78.8%, volume 80 kVp +58.2%) and reproducibility (F-tests: mass: P = 0.4998, volume: P = 0.9168, Agatston: P = 0.5422) were comparable at both tube voltages. Avoiding the appearance of artificial lesions, a CTDI(w,eff) of 10.7 mGy was needed at 120 kVp versus 4.6 mGy at 80 kVp (dose reduction of 57%). CONCLUSIONS: Using an 80-kVp protocol in coronary calcium scoring, a relevant dose reduction is possible without compromising reproducibility and accuracy.     

Effect of varying slice thickness on coronary calcium scoring with multislice computed tomography in vitro and in vivo

OBJECTIVES: To compare coronary calcium scoring results (calcium volume, calcium mass, Agatston score, and number of lesions) of different slice thicknesses using a 16-slice CT (MSCT) scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A nonmoving anthropomorphic thorax phantom with calcium cylinders of different sizes and densities was scanned 30 times with repositioning applying a standardized retrospectively ECG-gated MSCT (SOMATOM Sensation 16; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) scan protocol: collimation 12 x 0.75 mm, tube voltage 120 kV, effective tube current time-product 133 mAs(eff). Fifty patients (29 male; age 57.2 +/- 8.4 years) underwent a nonenhanced scan applying the same scan protocol. Two image sets (effective slice thicknesses 3 mm and 1 mm) were reconstructed at 60% of the RR interval. Image noise was measured in both studies. Calcium volume, calcium mass and Agatston score were calculated using a commercially available software tool. RESULTS: Due to increased image noise in thinner slices, calcium scoring in all scans was performed applying a scoring threshold of 350 HU. In the phantom study, 1-mm slices showed significantly higher scoring results in respect to calcium volume (+8.2%), calcium mass (+12.5%), and Agatston score (+5.3%) (all P < 0.0001). In the patient study, 27 patients had coronary calcifications in 3-mm slices, and 31 patients had coronary calcifications in 1-mm slices. Thinner slices showed significantly higher scoring results in respect to volume (+47.1%), mass (+47.2%), and Agatston score (+29.7%) (all P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: When comparing 3-mm and 1-mm slices in coronary calcium scoring in MSCT, thinner slices lead to significantly increased scoring results.     

The impact of motion artifacts on the reproducibility of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements

The purpose of this study is, using a 16-section multidetector-row helical computed tomography (MDCT) scanner with retrospective reconstruction, to compare variability in repeated coronary calcium scoring and qualitative scores of the motion artifacts. One hundred forty-four patients underwent two subsequent scans using MDCT. According to Agatston and volume algorithms, the coronary calcium scores during mid-diastole (the center corresponding to 70% of the R-R cycle) were calculated and the inter-scan variability was obtained. Motion artifacts from coronary artery calcium were subjectively evaluated and classified using a 5-point scale: 1, excellent; no motion artifacts; 2, fine, minor motion artifacts; 3, moderate, mild motion artifacts; 4, bad, severe motion artifacts; 5, poor, doubling or discontinuity. Each reading was done by vessels (left main, left descending, left circumflex and right coronary arteries) and the motion artifact score (mean of the scales) was determined per patient. The variability in the low (1.2+/-0.2) and high (2.4+/-0.6) motion artifact score groups was 7+/-6 (median, 6)% and 19+/-15 (16)% on the Agatston score (P<0.01) and 7+/-7 (6)% and 16+/-13 (14)% on the volume score (P<0.01), respectively. In conclusion, motion has a significant impact on the reproducibility of coronary calcium scoring.     

Overlapping cross-sections significantly improve the reproducibility of coronary calcium measurements by electron beam tomography: a phantom study

PURPOSE: We conducted phantom studies to investigate whether overlapping cross-sections and volumetric scoring would significantly improve interscan reproducibility of electron beam tomography (EBT) for coronary artery calcium quantification. METHOD: Fifteen phantoms simulating various amounts of coronary calcification were scanned in five different positions with a slice thickness of 3.0 mm and a table feed of 3.0, 2.5, and 2.0 mm. For the conventional "Agatston score" and a "volume score" (total volume of calcified lesions), interscan variabilities were compared between the three image acquisition protocols. RESULTS: Agatston score variability was significantly lower for the 2.0 mm table feed than for the 3.0 or 2.5 mm table feed (3.0 mm: 22.9 +/- 10.3%; 2.5 mm: 13.6 +/- 8.2%; 2.0 mm: 8.9 +/- 5.5%). Volume score variability was significantly lower for 2.5 and 2.0 mm table feed than for 3.0 mm table feed (3.0 mm: 21.7 +/- 11.0%; 2.5 mm: 10.9 +/- 5.9%; 2.0 mm: 9.8 +/- 5.9%). CONCLUSION: Overlapping cross-sections, especially in combination with volumetric scoring, significantly improved interscan reproducibility of EBT calcium quantification in a phantom study.     

Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by 16-MDCT with retrospective reconstruction

OBJECTIVE: High reproducibility on coronary calcium scoring is an important factor in monitoring the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. The purposes of this study were, using a 16-MDCT scanner with retrospective reconstruction, to compare the effects of thin-slice images and overlapping image reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium scoring and to compare 16-MDCT with electron beam CT (EBCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients underwent two sequential examinations using both EBCT and MDCT. For MDCT, images were reconstructed from the same raw data using the following thicknesses and increments (thickness/increment): 1.25 mm/1.25 mm, 2.5 mm/2.5 mm, and 2.5 mm/1.25 mm. The Agatston, volume, and mass scores were calculated on four pairs of image sets. Statistical analysis was performed to determine significant differences in interscan variability among image acquisition protocols and among measurement algorithms. RESULTS: Overlapping reconstructed images (thickness/increment, 2.5 mm/1.25 mm) obtained on a 16-MDCT scanner showed the lowest variability (mean, 13%; median, 10%) when compared with the Agatston score. CONCLUSION: The use of 16-MDCT with overlapping reconstruction by retrospective reconstruction, yielding low variability of coronary artery calcium measurement on two sequential scans, has an advantage over EBCT in monitoring the progression of atherosclerosis.     

Causes of interscan variability of coronary artery calcium measurements at electron-beam CT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed this study to investigate the causes of interscan variability of coronary artery calcium measurements at electron-beam computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two sets of electron-beam CT scans were obtained in 298 consecutive patients who underwent electron-beam CT to screen for coronary artery calcium. Interscan variations of coronary artery calcium characteristics and the effects of heart rate, electrocardiographic (ECG) triggering method, image noise, and coronary motion on interscan variability were analyzed. RESULTS: The interscan mean variabilities were 21.6% (median, 11.7%) and 17.8% (median, 10.8%) with the Agatston and volumetric score, respectively (P < .01). Variability decreased with increasing calcification score (34.6% for a score of 11-50 and 9.4% for a score of 400-1,000, P < .0001). The absolute difference in Agatston score between scans was 44.1 +/- 95.6. The correlation coefficient between the first and second sets of scans was 0.99 (P < .0001). Lower interscan variability was found in younger patients (<60 years), patients with stable heart rates (heart rate changing less than 10 beats per minute during scanning), patients with no visible coronary motion, and those with an optimal ECG triggering method (P < .05 for all). Results of multivariate logistic analysis showed that changes in calcium volume, mean attenuation, and peak attenuation were significant predictors of interscan variability and caused the interscan variations of the coronary artery calcium measurements (r2 = 0.83, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Coronary calcification at electron-beam CT varies from scan to scan. Volumetric scoring and optimal ECG triggering should be used to reduce interscan variability. Baseline calcium score and interscan variability must be considered in the evaluation of calcium progression.     

Evaluation of reconstruction windows for multislice computed tomography in quantification of coronary calcium

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To search for an optimum reconstruction window in retrospectively gated multislice computed tomography (MSCT) for quantification of coronary calcium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Coronary calcium quantified was examined as Agatston and volume scores by two experienced observers at 10 time points across the R-R interval of the electrocardiogram in 42 patients. A combination of statistical approaches was used to evaluate the distributions of minimum and maximum scores and of interobserver variability for both scoring methods across the cardiac cycle. RESULTS: Based on the combination of evaluation approaches, 60% to 70% of the R-R interval appeared to be the optimum time point for obtaining maximum calcium scores with minimum interobserver variability. The optimum time point was more clearly defined for the Agatston score than for the volume score. CONCLUSION: A reconstruction window beginning at 60% to 70% of the R-R interval seems to be most advantageous for retrospective gating of MSCT studies performed to quantify coronary calcium.     

Variation of the coronary calcium score depending on image reconstruction interval and scoring algorithm

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reconstruction interval dependent bandwidth of the coronary calcium score, considering different methods of image reconstruction and quantification of coronary calcifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients underwent coronary calcium scoring by use of retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. In all patients overlapping and nonoverlapping image reconstruction was performed every 10% of the RR-interval. Coronary calcium score was calculated for every reconstructed image series using the Agatston score and a volumetric scoring method. In 25 patients the analysis was performed twice to determine the reconstruction interval dependent intraobserver variability. RESULTS: For nonoverlapping image reconstruction the median of the calcium score determined by the Agatston method ranged from 125.8 to 216.2 and from 166.9 to 211.7 for the volumetric scoring method. For overlapping image reconstruction the corresponding values ranged from 91.6 to 160.5 for the Agatston score and 128.3 to 175.3 for the volumetric calcium score. Reconstruction interval dependent median (mean) variation of the coronary calcium score ranged from 24.1 (45.5)% for nonoverlapping image reconstruction using the Agatston score to 17.5 (25.2)% utilizing a volumetric calcium score with overlapping image reconstruction. There was no statistical significant (P< 0.05) difference between the different methods. Intraobserver variability for the different image reconstruction intervals ranged from 0.78% to 21.51%. The least intraobserver variability was found for overlapping image reconstruction during the diastole using the volumetric scoring method. CONCLUSIONS: Diastolic image reconstruction at 50% or 60% of the RR-interval is recommendable for retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Volumetric calcium scoring and overlapping image reconstruction are beneficial to reduce the variation of the coronary calcium score.     

Evidence for lower variability of coronary artery calcium mineral mass measurements by multi-detector computed tomography in a community-based cohort--consequences for progression studies

PURPOSE: To compare the measurement variability for coronary artery calcium (CAC) measurements using mineral mass compared with a modified Agatston score (AS) or volume score (VS) with multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanning, and to estimate the potential impact of these methods on the design of CAC progression studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 162 consecutive subjects (83 women, 79 men, mean age 51 +/- 11 years) from a general Caucasian community-based cohort (Framingham Heart Study) with duplicate runs of prospective electrocardiographically-triggered MDCT scanning. Each scan was independently evaluated for the presence of CAC by four experienced observers who determined a "modified" AS, VS and mineral mass. RESULTS: Of the 162 subjects, CAC was detected in both scans in 69 (42%) and no CAC was detected in either scan in 72 (45%). Calcium scores were low in the 21/162 subjects (12%) for whom CAC was present in one but not the other scan (modified AS < 20 in 20/21 subjects, mean AS 4.6 +/- 1.9). For all three quantification algorithms, the inter- and intraobserver correlation were excellent (r > 0.96). However, the mean interscan variability was significantly different between mineral mass, modified AS, and VS (coefficient of variation 26 +/- 19%, 41 +/- 28% and 34 +/- 25%, respectively; p < 0.04), with significantly smaller mean differences in pair-wise comparisons for mineral mass compared with modified AS (p < 0.002) or with VS (p < 0.03). The amount of CAC but not heart rate was an independent predictor of interscan variability (r = -0.638, -0.614 and -0.577 for AS, VS, and mineral mass, respectively; all p < 0.0001). The decreased interscan variability of mineral mass would allow a sample size reduction of 5.5% compared with modified AS for observational studies of CAC progression and for randomized clinical trials. CONCLUSION: There is significantly reduced interscan variability of CAC measurements with mineral mass compared with the modified AS or VS. However, the measurement variability of all quantification methods is predicted by the amount of CAC and is inversely correlated to the extent of partial volume artifacts. Moreover, the improvement of measurement reproducibility leads to a modest reduction in sample size for observational epidemiological studies or randomized clinical trials to assess the progression of CAC.     

Reproducibility and accuracy of coronary calcium measurements with multi-detector row versus electron-beam CT

PURPOSE: To methodically evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of coronary arterial calcification measurements by using spiral multi-detector row and electron-beam computed tomography (CT) with a beating heart phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom was built to mimic a beating heart with coronary arteries and calcified plaques. The simulated vessels moved in a pattern similar to that of a beating heart. The phantom operated at a variety of pulse rates (0-140 beats per minute). The phantom was repeatedly scanned in various positions by using various protocols with electron-beam and multi-detector row CT scanners to assess interexamination variability. Statistical analysis was performed to determine significant differences in interexamination variability for various acquisition protocols. RESULTS: Electrocardiographically (EKG) gated volume coverage with spiral multi-detector row CT (2.5-mm collimation) and overlapping image reconstruction (1-mm increment) was found to significantly improve the reliability of coronary arterial calcium quantification, especially for small plaques (P <.05). Mean interexamination variability was reduced from 35% +/- 6 (SD) (Agatston score, standard electron-beam CT) to 4% +/- 2 (P <.05) (volumetric score, spiral EKG-gated multi-detector row CT). CONCLUSION: By coupling retrospective gating with nearly isotropic volumetric imaging data, spiral multi-detector row CT provides better input data for quantification of coronary arterial calcium volume. Multi-detector row CT allows precise and repeated measurement of coronary arterial calcification, with low interexamination variability.     

The influence of heart rate, slice thickness, and calcification density on calcium scores using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography: a systematic phantom study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of heart rate, slice thickness, and calcification density on absolute value and variability of calcium score using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three artificial arteries containing each 3 lesions with varying density were scanned using a moving cardiac phantom at rest and at 50 to 110 beats per minute (bpm) at 10-bpm intervals on a 64-slice MDCT. Images were reconstructed at slice thicknesses (increment) of 0.6 (0.4), 0.75 (0.5), 1.5 (1.5), and 3.0 (3.0) mm. The amount of calcium was expressed as an Agatston score, volume score, and equivalent mass. RESULTS: Absolute coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores decreased [average -37% for low density calcification (LDC)] or increased [average +32% for high density calcification (HDC)] at heart rates over 60 bpm depending on slice thickness and scoring method. Thinner slice thicknesses yielded higher CAC scores. Variability of the CAC scores increased with increasing heart rates especially for low density calcifications (8% at rest vs. 50% at 110 bpm). Variability also increased for thicker slices (average 6% for 0.6 mm vs. 18% for 3.0 mm). Variability was lower for HDC compared with LDC (approximately 5% for HDC vs. 27% for LDC at 70 bpm, averaged over all methods and slice thicknesses). CONCLUSION: CAC-scoring is strongly influenced by cardiac motion, calcification density, and slice thickness. CAC scores increase for high density calcifications and decrease for low density calcifications at increasing heart rates. Heart rate should be reduced on 64-slice MDCT to obtain a lower degree of variability of CAC-scoring, preferably below 70 bpm. A thinner slice thickness further enhances the reproducibility.     

The interscan variation of CT coronary artery calcification score: analysis of the Calcium Acetate Renagel Comparison (CARE)-2 study

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In the Calcium Acetate Renagel Evaluation (CARE)-2 study, the effects of calcium acetate plus atorvastatin (Lipitor) on the progression of coronary artery calcifications (CACs) are evaluated versus those of Renagel, monitored using dual electron beam tomography (EBT) scans (two scans at study initiation and two at follow up). The aim of this study is to estimate the interscan variation for the Agatston score and for the volume score determined in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the CARE-2 study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CAC score and volume were measured at study initiation in 463 ESRD subjects (mean age: 59.4 +/- 12.5 years, 48.3% female). All patients underwent dual scanning using an EBT, as first scan of two needed to measure the progression of CAC when treated with sevelamer (Renagel) compared with calcium acetate with or without atorvastatin. All scans in all participants were completed by using an EBT system (GE Imatron, South San Francisco, CA). Interscan variability was defined by the following formula: abs (scan A - scan B) / (0.5 x scan A + 0.5 x scan B) x 100%, where A and B denote the first and second scan, respectively, of the dual scan procedure performed before treatment. We evaluated the reproducibility of the cutpoints commonly used for calcium scores clinically, namely 1-30, 31-100, 101-400, and >400. RESULTS: The CAC interscan variability was 11.8% using the Agatston score and 10.3% using the volume score. The reproducibility was then assessed using cutpoints 1-30, 31-100, 101-400, and >400. Agatston score variability for the four subgroups was 61.3%, 23%, 16.1%, and 8.2%, respectively (mean variability, 11.8%). Volume score variability was 60.0%, 14.4%, 14.6%, and 7.7%, respectively (mean variability, 10.3%). The correlation coefficient for scan A to scan B goes up significantly with increasing calcium scores and reaches 0.99 for scores greater than 400 (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Interscan variability was sufficiently small for patients with calcium scores greater than 30. Our study thus demonstrates a sufficient reproducibility of the calcium score using EBT. This score allows for accurate serial assessment of these patients and for comparing different therapies.