Antiplatelet effects of abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide in patients undergoing coronary stenting

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate whether abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide achieve comparable antiplatelet effects with coronary stenting. BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide differ in chemical structure, binding site and pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing coronary stenting were randomly assigned to abciximab (bolus 0.25 mg/kg body weight, infusion 10 microg per min for 12 h), tirofiban (bolus 10 microg/kg, infusion 0.15 microg/kg per min for 72 h) or eptifibatide (bolus 180 microg/kg, infusion 2 microg/kg per min for 72 h). We took serial blood samples to analyze platelet function by using flow cytometry, turbidimetric aggregometry and the rapid platelet-function assay (RPFA). RESULTS: As assessed by RPFA, platelet aggregation after 2 h of infusion was reduced to 5.9 +/- 7.8% (mean +/- SD) of baseline by abciximab, to 5.0 +/- 5.4% by tirofiban and to 7.8 +/- 7.1% by eptifibatide (p = 0.42). Turbidimetric aggregometry with adenosine diphosphate stimulation yielded similar results, whereas percent inhibition of platelet aggregation after thrombin receptor stimulation was 45.8 +/- 16.8% with abciximab, 51.3 +/- 17.6% with tirofiban and 52.9 +/- 14.8% with eptifibatide (p = 0.37). Tirofiban and eptifibatide maintained their level of platelet inhibition during infusion. Flow cytometry revealed that the reduction in the monocyte-platelet interaction by abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide was not significantly different (20.0 +/- 21.9%, 23.8 +/- 18.2% and 21.0 +/- 19.8%, respectively; p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide, at currently recommended doses, achieved similar levels of inhibition of platelet aggregation and a similar reduction in the platelet-monocyte interaction.     

Abciximab Pharmacodynamics Are Unaffected by Antecedent Therapy with Other GPIIb/IIIa Antagonists in Non-Human Primates

Background: Tirofiban and eptifibatide are currently approved for the medical stabilization of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during infusion of these drugs, conversion to abciximab, which has long term proven clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness, following PCI may be desirable. The purpose of this study was to determine if the binding or pharmacodynamics of abciximab is affected by a prior infusion of either tirofiban or eptifibatide. Methods: In vitro binding experiments were performed to determine if prior exposure to tirofiban or eptifibatide altered the affinity and extent of binding of abciximab to GPIIb/IIIa. For in vivo experiments, cynomolgus monkeys were pretreated with a bolus and 18 hour infusion of saline, tirofiban, or eptifibatide. At the end of the initial treatment, a bolus and 12 hr infusion of abciximab was started without delay. Inhibition of platelet aggregation, GPIIb/IIIa receptor blockade and abciximab pharmacokinetics were measured during and after both infusions. Results: Equilibrium binding of abciximab in vitro was unaffected by tirofiban or eptifibatide. The extent and duration of abciximab inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation, receptor blockade, and abciximab pharmacokinetics in monkeys during and after the abciximab infusion were not affected by prior infusion of the animals with tirofiban or eptifibatide. Conclusions: In vitro and in vivo studies revealed that the molecular interaction of abciximab with the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor is not altered by immediate prior exposure of platelets to small molecule GPIIb/IIIa antagonists. These preclinical studies suggest that the efficacy of abciximab should not be impaired if it is initiated following termination of therapy with small molecule GPIIb/IIIa antagonists.     

Comparative Pharmacology of GP IIb/IIIa Antagonists

GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are qualitatively different from classical antiplatelet agents, such as aspirin or clopidogrel. They do not inhibit platelet activation, i.e. intraplatelet signal generation or conduction but primarily act outside the platelet by competing with ligand (e.g. fibrinogen) binding that is essential for platelet bridging and aggregate formation. Three compounds are in clinical use: abciximab, an antibody fragment and two low-molecular weight compounds, tirofiban and eptifibatide. In comparison to the low-molecular weight compounds, abciximab has a substantially longer platelet half-life (4 h), i.e. slow off-rate and a short plasma half-life (20-30 min) without significant distribution into the extravascular space. The plasma half-life of tirofiban and eptifibatide is about 2 h and parallels the antiplatelet effect. The off-rate from the platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor is much faster and there is a significant distribution into the extravascular space. These pharmacokinetic variables might influence the competition between the antagonists and fibrinogen for GP IIb/IIIa binding. Other pharmacological variables are a partial agonistic activity, facilitation of thrombolysis, modification of other integrin-related actions, including inflammatory responses, effects on vascular cells and apoptosis. Importantly, GP IIb/IIIa antagonists might also interfere with prothrombin binding to the platelet surface and, thus, might influence the coagulation pathway. There is no clear evidence that the biological activity of the agents is modified by gene polymorphism (HPA-1). All three compounds may cause thrombocytopenia, possibly related to drug-induced antibodies. There is no clear data suggesting that these pharmacological differences transfer into significant differences in clinical outcome, for example in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) subjected to acute percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The only head-to-head comparison of all three clinically used parenteral compounds did not demonstrate differences in major adverse cardiac effects (MACE) at 30 days although those have been described in particular with long-term use of oral antagonists. The inherent problems with all GP IIb/IIIa antagonists are the narrow therapeutic range because the same mechanisms are involved in hemostasis and thrombosis and their inability to inhibit platelet activation.     

Administration of abciximab to patients receiving tirofiban or eptifibatide: effect on platelet function.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate platelet function and to preliminarily assess the clinical safety of sequential treatment with tirofiban or eptifibatide followed by abciximab in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: An increasing number of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are treated early with tirofiban or eptifibatide. Some later require PCI and may benefit from switching to abciximab, for which long-term benefits have been reported. METHODS: Fifty ACS patients planned for PCI were enrolled. Twenty-five patients received tirofiban followed by abciximab. Ten patients received eptifibatide followed by abciximab. Fifteen patients received only abciximab. All patients had blood samples drawn six times during the therapeutic course. Platelet function was evaluated by ADP- and TRAP-induced aggregation, flow cytometry analysis of fibrinogen binding and the cone and plate(let) analyzer, which tests shear rate-dependent platelet activation. RESULTS: Administered after tirofiban, abciximab caused a significant further decline in platelet function, as evidenced by all methods. Administered after eptifibatide, abciximab caused a significant further reduction in platelet function, as assessed by the cone and plate(let) analyzer and fibrinogen binding methods. The platelet inhibition achieved by the combination therapy was always greater than or equal to that achieved by abciximab alone. There were no major bleeding or severe thrombocytopenia episodes. Three of the 35 combination therapy patients and one of the 15 who received abciximab alone had minor bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first in vivo study of combination intravenous platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy. Administration of abciximab immediately after tirofiban or eptifibatide therapy effectively inhibits platelet function and appears to be safe.     

Perspectives on the Long Term Management of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists used widely in the medical treatment of acute coronary syndromes and during percutaneous coronary interventions, prevent fibrinogen cross-linking and platelet aggregation, critical initiating steps in arterial thrombosis. Their anticoagulant properties, particularly when administered conjunctively with heparin preparations, are less well-characterized. In a series of in vitro studies, increasing concentrations of abciximab, tirofiban, and eptifibatide either alone or in combination with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or fractionated heparin (enoxaparin) were added to washed platelets suspended in Tyrode's buffer. Following platelet activation and prothrombinase assembly, thrombin generation was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). There was a concentration-dependent reduction in platelet-dependent thrombin generation with each of the GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonists. The combination of tirofiban and UFH yielded percent, absolute and relative reductions (compared with tirofiban alone) of 48.0%, 16.9%, and 35.2%, respectively. The corresponding values for eptifibatide and abciximab were 38.0%, 13.5%, 35.5%, and 55.1%, 3.8%, 8.4%, respectively. Thrombin generation was decreased by an additional 2 to 3% (absolute reduction) with high concentrations of enoxaparin in combination with either eptifibatide or abciximab. Platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, beyond their ability to prevent fibrinogen-mediated aggregation, inhibit platelet-dependent prothrombinase activity and thrombin generation in a concentration-dependent manner. Heparin facilitates the existing anticoagulant properties, supporting combination therapy in clinical practice. The potential added benefit of fractionated heparin over UFH will require further investigation.     

Current knowledge of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists for the treatment of coronary artery disease

Understanding of the pivotal role of the platelet surface membrane glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor in platelet aggregation at the injured coronary plaque in acute coronary syndromes has led to recent pharmacologic strategies that focus on inhibition of this final common pathway. Several intravenous medications directed specifically at this receptor (called platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists; GPAs) have emerged. These include the human-murine chimeric monoclonal antibody Fab fragment abciximab, the peptide antagonist eptifibatide and the peptidomimetics tirofiban and lamifiban. To date, over 33,000 patients have been studied with these compounds in 11 large, randomized placebo controlled trials which have established the effectiveness of these drugs in conditions where platelet aggregation and thrombosis play major contributing roles such as in high-risk coronary intervention, myocardial infarction and unstable angina. GPAs have been proven to be effective in reducing ischemic complications when used as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary revascularization or the management of acute ischemic syndromes. They are well tolerated and safe, provided concomitant use with other antithrombotics (e.g. heparin) is carefully managed and platelet counts are monitored.     

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade in coronary artery disease

New strategies for profound inhibition of platelet activity at the injured coronary plaque focus on blockade of the platelet surface membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, which binds circulating fibrinogen or von Willebrand factor and crosslinks platelets as the final common pathway to platelet aggregation. Intravenous agents directed against this receptor include the chimeric monoclonal antibody fragment abciximab, the peptide inhibitor eptifibatide and nonpeptide mimetics tirofiban and lamifiban. Over 33,000 patients have been evaluated in 11 large-scale, placebo-controlled trials of these agents. During percutaneous coronary intervention, an absolute reduction of 1.5% to 6.5% in the 30-day risk of death, myocardial infarction or repeat urgent revascularization has been observed, with some variability in treatment effect among the agents tested (abciximab, eptifibatide and tirofiban). Treatment effect is achieved early with every modality of revascularization and is maintained over the long-term (up to three years). Increased bleeding risk may be minimized by reduction and weight-adjustment of concomitant heparin dosing. In the acute coronary syndromes without ST segment elevation, absolute 1.5% to 3.2% reductions in 30-day rates of death or myocardial (re-) infarction have been achieved with two to four day courses of eptifibatide or tirofiban. Clinical benefit accrues during the period of drug infusion and is durable. Treatment effect may be enhanced among patients undergoing early coronary revascularization, with evidence of stabilization before intervention and suppression of postprocedural ischemic events. Thus, blockade of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor reduces ischemic complications when used as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention or the management of acute ischemic syndromes.     

Profound thrombocytopenia associated with tirofiban: case report and review of literature

Platelet glycoprotein (GP)IIb/IIIa inhibitors prevent fibrinogen binding and platelet aggregation. Inhibition of platelet activity at the injured coronary plaque is a target for novel therapeutic strategies. They decrease ischemic complications associated with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention. Thrombocytopenia is a serious complication well described with the use of the prototype GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab. Its association with other agents of this class has been underemphasized. It is important to monitor platelet counts closely after initiation of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy, not only for abciximab, but also for small molecule inhibitors such as eptifibatide and tirofiban. Monitoring of platelet counts at 2 to 6 hours and 24 hours will detect most cases of acute thrombocytopenia. Adverse events may be prevented by prompt discontinuation of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy. The authors present a case of profound thrombocytopenia after the administration of tirofiban in the treatment of a patient with an acute coronary syndrome.     

Platelet Aggregation Inhibition with Glycoprotein IIb–IIIa Inhibitors

Inhibitors of the platelet receptor glycoprotein (GP) IIb--IIIa are a novel and potent class of antithrombotic drugs for the management of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Pharmacodynamic studies with three currently approved agents in this class (abciximab [ReoPro, Centocor, Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, and Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, Indiana]; eptifibatide [INTEGRILIN, COR Therapeutics, Inc., South San Francisco, California, and Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey]; and tirofiban HCI [Aggrastat, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey]) all sought to identify dosing regimens that would establish and maintain >80 % inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation throughout the duration of intravenous infusion. Direct comparison of these prior studies is difficult, however, because the assays used different anticoagulants (sodium citrate [abciximab, tirofiban HCI] or D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone [PPACK] [eptifibatide]) and different concentrations of the platelet agonist adenosine diphosphate (ADP) (5 micromol [tirofiban HCI] or 20 micromol [abciximab, eptifibatide]). More recent work has attempted to overcome these limitations by using similar assay conditions for all GP IIb--IIIa inhibitors. These studies have indicated that the concentrations of all three agents required to provide the targeted effect for platelet inhibition are considerably higher in the presence of an anticoagulant that does not chelate calcium ions (e.g., heparin or PPACK) than in the presence of calcium-chelating anticoagulant (i.e., sodium citrate). Of the three currently approved GP IIb--IIIa inhibitors, eptifibatide is the only agent whose approved dosing is based on an ex vivo platelet aggregation assay that uses such an anticoagulant. Additionally, Kereiakes et al. have recently reported that the high levels of platelet inhibition (>80 %), using PPACK as an anticoagulant and ADP (20 micromol) as an agonist, are more consistently achieved with the approved dosing regimen of eptifibatide. The antiplatelet effect of abciximab showed more interpatient variability, whereas the median inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation with the approved dosing regimen for tirofiban HCl was <80 % at almost all time points during drug infusion.     

Differential Effects of Citrate Versus PPACK Anticoagulation on Measured Platelet Inhibition by Abciximab, Eptifibatide and Tirofiban

Background: High levels of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition are required to prevent arterial thrombosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. Ex-vivo turbidometric platelet aggregation in citrate anticoagulated blood samples has been the primary method previously utilized to derive dose regimens for administering platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Enhanced GP IIb/IIIa binding and inhibition of platelet aggregation for eptifibatide secondary to citrate induced reduction of ionized plasma calcium concentrations has been reported. Methods/Results: We evaluated the differential effects of citrate versus PPACK anticoagulation on turbidometric platelet inhibition in normal volunteers by eptifibatide, tirofiban or abciximab. The decrease in ionized calcium afforded by citrate was associated with enhanced in vitro platelet inhibition for all three GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, including abciximab. The magnitude of citrate effect was greatest for eptifibatide. Both tirofiban and abciximab have similar citrate calcium chelation associated enhancement of measured platelet inhibition.Conclusion: Accurate assessment and comparison of platelet inhibition by GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors may require avoidance of calcium chelating anticoagulants.     

Long‐term mortality after bolus‐only administration of abciximab,eptifibatide, or tirofiban during percutaneous coronary intervention

Objective:

To evaluate the long‐term mortality after bolus‐only administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Background:

Studies on platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) administered as bolus‐only during PCI suggest that this strategy may be similar in efficacy, safer, and more cost‐effective compared to a bolus plus infusion of GPI.

Methods:

We evaluated 864 patients (abciximab = 274, eptifibatide = 361, and tirofiban = 229) who underwent PCI with a bolus‐only regimen during January 2003 to August 2005.

Results:

After a median follow up of four (interquartile range, 3–4.5) years, there were a total of 95 (11%) deaths. The survival rate was 83% in the abciximab group, 91% in the eptifibatide group, and 93% in the tirofiban group (P = 0.003 by log‐rank test). After adjustment for baseline clinical and procedural characteristics using a Cox proportional hazards model, the abciximab group had a significantly higher mortality compared to the eptifibatide group (P = 0.003; Hazard ratio (HR) for eptifibatide compared to abciximab was 0.49 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.30–0.78). The long‐term mortality was not significantly different in the tirofiban group compared to the abciximab group (P = 0.33) or the eptifibatide group (P = 0.20), perhaps because of shorter follow‐up period and fewer patients in the tirofiban group.

Conclusion:

When given as bolus‐only during PCI, eptifibatide may improve long‐term survival compared to abciximab. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

High Platelet Count in Platelet-Rich Plasma Reduces Measured Platelet Inhibition by Abciximab but not Tirofiban nor Eptifibatide Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonists

We evaluated the differential effect of platelet count in platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the level of ex vivo inhibition of platelet aggregation provided by abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban as part of a randomized, comparative trial of these agents on platelet function in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Platelet count <350 K/µL in PRP reduced measured platelet inhibition by abciximab, but not eptifibatide nor tirofiban. This observation suggests the need for standardized, uniform platelet counts in PRP during future comparisons of the degree of platelet inhibition by these agents.     

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and its clinical use

The activation of platelets and the resultant aggregation have been shown to play important role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and peripheral vascular diseases and in acute coronary syndromes. Hence platelet adhesion and aggregation have been identified as promising targets for the development of anti-thrombotic drugs. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonism exerts a strong anti-platelet effect, because this interference inhibits the final common pathway of platelet aggregation and is not dependent on a single activation pathway. Three GPIIb/IIIa antagonists have been approved by the US Food and Drug administration. They include abciximab (the chimeric monoclonal antibody 7E3 Fab fragment), eptifibatide (the cyclic heptapeptide based on the KGD amino acid sequence) and tirofiban (a nonpeptide tyrosine derivative). In addition, nonpeptide oral GPIIb/IIIa antagonists are also in various stages of clinical development. This paper reviews the molecular biology of the GPIIb/IIIa receptor, history of development of GPIIb/IIIa antagonists, some issues about GPIIb/IIIb antagonists including their affinity, reversibility and receptor specificity, adverse effects including bleeding and thrombocytopenia, clinical trials and costs. Future direction in the development of GPIIb/IIIa antagonists is also discussed.     

Successful use of eptifibatide as an adjunct to coronary stenting in a patient with abciximab-associated acute profound thrombocytopenia

A 72-year-old male who was given abciximab for unstable angina developed acute profound thrombocytopenia with a platelet count nadir of 6,000/mm3. He was treated with steroids and platelet transfusion. Four days later, he underwent coronary angioplasty after pretreatment with eptifibatide without development of thrombocytopenia. This suggests that the development of thrombocytopenia with abciximab is not necessarily a contraindication to subsequent use of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists. Eptifibatide may be an appropriate consideration in high-risk patients who would benefit from a GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, in spite of acute profound thrombocytopenia due to abciximab therapy.     

Meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety of abciximab versus eptifibatide or tirofiban in percutaneous coronary intervention

Three platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists have been evaluated in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). One of these agents, abciximab, is structurally and pharmacologically quite different from the other 2, eptifibatide and tirofiban. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine whether different antagonist types achieved different clinical outcomes, possibly related to their structural differences. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated and a random effects model was used to combine the outcomes of 14,644 patients enrolled in 8 prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials assessing treatment with a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor to prevent ischemic complications of PCI. Neither abciximab (OR 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4 to 1.9) nor eptifibatide or tirofiban treatment (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.4 to 1.28) resulted in reductions in mortality. Only the abciximab-treated patients had reductions in myocardial infarction (4.3% vs 8.5%, OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.59). There was no effect of eptifibatide or tirofiban on myocardial infarction (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.04). Urgent revascularization was reduced in both abciximab-treated (2.7% vs 6.2%, OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.53) and eptifibatide- and tirofiban-treated (4.2% vs 5.5%, OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.96) groups. Only abciximab-treated patients had increased major bleeding (5.8% vs 3.8%; OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.24 to 1.90). There was no effect of eptifibatide or tirofiban on major bleeding (5.0% vs 4.3%; OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.52). Thus, significant differences exist between clinical outcomes achieved by abciximab and those achieved by eptifibatide or tirofiban following PCl procedures.     

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa and P2Y12 receptor antagonists yield additive inhibition of platelet aggregation, granule secretion, soluble CD40L release and procoagulant responses

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) antagonists, including abciximab and tirofiban, are administered concurrently with clopidogrel, a P2Y12 antagonist, and aspirin in some patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We studied the effects of, and interactions between, abciximab, tirofiban, aspirin and the P2Y12 antagonist cangrelor on platelet aggregation, alpha and dense granule secretion and procoagulant responses in vitro. Blood was obtained from healthy volunteers. Platelet aggregation, dense granule secretion, alpha granule secretion (PAI-1 and soluble CD40 ligand levels) and procoagulant responses (annexin-V and microparticle formation) were assessed using collagen and thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP) as agonists. All the antagonists used singularly inhibited collagen-induced responses. Combinations of abciximab or tirofiban with aspirin and/or cangrelor gave additive inhibition with the greatest effect seen when abciximab or tirofiban was combined with both aspirin and cangrelor. Cangrelor inhibited TRAP-induced responses and, again, there was additive inhibition of these parameters when abciximab or tirofiban were combined with cangrelor. The GPIIb/IIIa receptor plays an important role in amplification of platelet activation such that there are important interactions between GPIIb/IIIa antagonists and inhibitors of both P2Y12 receptor activation and, to a lesser extent, thromboxane A2 generation. These interactions are likely to have important influences on the safety and efficacy of combination anti-platelet therapies.     

Time course, magnitude, and consistency of platelet inhibition by abciximab, tirofiban, or eptifibatide in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces platelet-mediated adverse ischemic outcomes. Although abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for use, these agents differ in their pharmacodynamic profiles. Each of these agents has been compared in randomized trials with placebo for patients undergoing PCI, but no randomized comparative studies of these agents have been performed. We compared ex vivo platelet function by both standard light transmission aggregometry and rapid platelet function assay during and after administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban in approved dose regimens on a randomized basis at the time of PCI in patients with unstable angina pectoris. A reduced intensity of platelet inhibition by light transmission aggregometry was observed for tirofiban compared with either eptifibatide or abciximab. In addition, the 30-minute bolus strategy used for tirofiban was associated with delayed onset of maximal platelet inhibition relative to the initiation of bolus infusion. Whether the trends in platelet function observed in this study will be translated into differences in clinical outcomes awaits definition by larger scale randomized clinical trials comparing these platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.     

Acute thrombocytopenia associated with eptifibatide therapy

BACKGROUND: Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor blockade improves clinical outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions and in acute coronary syndromes. Thrombocytopenia is a serious complication well described with the use of the prototype GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab. Its association with other agents of this class has been underemphasized. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of thrombocytopenia in a cohort of patients treated with eptifibatide at a tertiary cardiac centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chart review of consecutive patients treated with eptifibatide at the study institution. RESULTS: There were four (1.3%) cases of acute thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 100 x 10(9)/L) among 305 patients reviewed. One patient had been previously exposed to eptifibatide. The other three patients are described. In each case, platelet counts declined within 6 h of receiving eptifibatide. Recovery of platelet counts was noted within 6 to 30 h after withdrawal of eptifibatide. No patient suffered an adverse clinical event related to thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to monitor platelet counts closely after initiation of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy, not only for abciximab, but also for small molecule inhibitors such as eptifibatide. Monitoring of platelet counts at 2 to 6 h and 24 h will detect most cases of acute thrombocytopenia. Adverse events may be prevented by prompt discontinuation of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy.     

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists and low-molecular weight heparin in acute coronary syndromes.

The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists and the low-molecular weight heparins are the newest additions to the armamentarium of antiplatelet drugs for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. They are extremely potent inhibitors of platelet aggregation and thrombin generation, respectively. There are currently three GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban) and two low-molecular weight heparins (dalteparin and enoxaparin) approved for use with acute coronary syndromes. Data continue to accumulate outlining the specific roles for these drugs in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Clinical trials in patients with acute coronary syndromes have demonstrated that the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists and low-molecular weight heparins offer significant benefit with acceptable safety profiles. Future issues that need to be addressed include refinement of indications for administration and patient selection, comparison between existing agents, evaluation of newer agents, and optimization of dosing to maximize benefit and safety in the use of these powerful new classes of drugs.     

Update on Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade in Endovascular Interventions

Platelet aggregation plays a central role in the ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and the acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Although aspirin and heparin have been effective at decreasing adverse events in these settings, the perceived need for more potent inhibition of platelet aggregation has led to targeting of the platelet surface membrane glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) receptor. Several agents have been developed; four: abciximab, tirofiban, eptifibatide, and lamifiban have been tested in clinical trials. Overall, the positive findings of these studies have supported the hypothesis that enhanced platelet blockade leads to improved clinical outcomes in the settings of PCI and ACS. In this article, an overview of the various GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors is presented. The clinical trials of these agents as adjunctive therapy for patients undergoing PCI and in treatment of acute myocardial infarction are reviewed. Practical considerations relating to clinical efficacy, drug safety, and economic issues are discussed.