Better late than never? Experience with intravenous pamidronate treatment in patients with low bone mass or fractures following cardiac or liver transplantation

 Organ transplantation is associated with a high turnover of bone metabolism, and an increased loss of bone mass and incidence of osteoporotic fractures. Established therapies for osteoporosis after organ transplantation are still lacking, however. We report on an intravenous bisphosphonate therapy initiated in transplant patients because of a high rate of bone loss or incident osteoporotic fractures. Twenty-one patients after liver transplantation and 13 patients after heart transplantation received 30 mg pamidronate intravenously every 3 months, combined with 1000 mg calcium and 1000 IU vitamin D per day. The median time interval between transplantation and start of pamidronate treatment was 1.9 years in cardiac patients and 2.3 years in liver patients. Lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) and femoral neck BMD (FN BMD) were measured before and every 6 months after pamidronate therapy was initiated. Spinal radiographs were performed annually. Biochemical markers of bone metabolism were determined every 3 months, immediately before pamidronate administration. From a previous observational study, 58 patients treated only with calcium and vitamin D were matched for age, sex, pretransplantation LS BMD and time interval between transplantation and the first pamidronate treatment. In the pamidronate-treated patients, the mean increase in LS BMD adjusted for baseline values amounted to 0.080 ± 0.038 g/cm² (8.6 ± 4.0 %) after 1 year and 0.091 ± 0.058 g/cm² (10.4 ± 6.1%) after 2 years compared with 0.001 ± 0.037 g/cm² (0.26 ± 4.0%) after 1 year and 0.015 ± 0.057 g/cm² (1.8 ± 6.0%) after 2 years in the historical control group (absolute LS BMD changes pamidronate group vs historical group p < 0.0001 after 1 and 2 years). The changes of FN BMD were 0.024 ± 0.043 g/cm² (3.2 ± 6.1%) after 1 year and 0.046 ± 0.052 g/cm² (7.0 ± 6.1%) after 2 years in the pamidronate group compared with −0.012 ± 0.043 g/cm² (−1.6 ± 6.1%) after 1 year and −0.013 ± 0.052 g/cm² (−1.1 ± 6.1%) after 2 years in the historical control group (absolute FN BMD changes pamidronate group vs historical group p=0.003 after 1 year and p=0.001 after 2 years). From a total of 287 application cycles of pamidronate treatment, no severe side effects were observed and non-severe side effects were seen in only 39 cycles (13.6%). We conclude that cyclic intravenous pamidronate treatment is beneficial to patients with low bone mass or osteoporotic fractures following transplant, even when not immediately initiated. Received: 5 March 2002 / Accepted: 27 August 2002     

Effect of early risedronate treatment on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers after liver transplantation: a prospective single‐center study

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of risedronate (RIS) on bone loss and bone turnover markers after liver transplantation (LT). Patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis within the first month after LT were randomized to receive RIS 35 mg/week plus calcium 1000 mg/day and vitamin D₃ 800 IU/day (n = 45) or calcium and vitamin D₃ at same dosages (n = 44). Primary endpoint was change in bone mineral density (BMD) 6 and 12 months after LT. Secondary endpoints included changes in serum β‐CrossLaps (β‐CTX) and procollagen type 1 amino‐terminal peptide (P1NP) and fracture rate. Spine X‐rays were obtained at baseline and after 12 months. There was no significant difference in BMD changes between both treatment groups at any sites; either at 6 or 12 months. Spine BMD increased in both groups at 12 months vs. baseline (P = 0.001). RIS patients had a significant increase in intertrochanteric BMD at 12 months (P < 0.05 vs. baseline). Serum β‐CTX decreased in both groups (P < 0.01), with significant differences between groups at 3 months. No significant difference in vertebral fracture incidence was found. After 12 months, BMD improved at lumbar spine and did not change at hip in both groups. Significant differences between both groups were not found. Other factors (calcium and vitamin D replacement, early prednisone withdrawal) seem to have also positive effects in BMD.     

Bone mineral density in lung-transplant recipients before and after graft: prevention of lumbar spine post-transplantation-accelerated bone loss by pamidronate.

BACKGROUND: Lung-transplant recipients are at risk of osteoporosis. They may have low bone mass even before posttransplantation immunosuppressive therapy. We studied bone mineral density (BMD) before and after lung transplantation and compared the efficacy of antiresorptive therapies to calcium and vitamin D supplementation. METHODS: Areal BMD was assessed in 42 patients awaiting lung transplantation and measured again after surgery at 6 (n = 29), and at 12 months (n = 20). Nineteen patients received antiresorptive therapy (30 mg pamidronate IV every 3 months (n = 14), or hormonal replacement therapy (n = 5)), and 10 patients received only calcium and vitamin D supplements.RESULTS: Mean age- and gender-adjusted lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD was significantly decreased prior to transplantation (- 0.6 +/- 0.2, p< 0.01, and - 1.5 +/- 0.2 standard deviation, p < 0.001, respectively). At that time, 29% were osteoporotic (T-score < - 2.5 below the peak bone mass), while 55% were below - 1.0 T-score. Antiresorptive therapy decreased the rate of LS bone loss during the first 6 months and led to a significant increase of BMD at 1 year, with LS changes of + 0.2 +/- 0.1 vs - 0.4 +/- 0.1 Z-score in the calcium-vitamin D group (p< 0.002), and + 0.2 +/- 0.1 vs - 0.04 +/- 0.1 for FN (NS). One out of 20 patients experienced clinically evident fractures during antiresorptive therapy, and 3 out of 12 in the calcium-vitamin D group. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients awaiting lung transplantation was osteoporotic or osteopenic. Antiresorptive therapy (pamidronate or hormone-replacement therapy (HRT)) prevented accelerated LS bone loss after graft.     

Pamidronate therapy as prevention of bone loss following renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Very rapid bone loss, osteopenia and skeletal morbidity after renal transplantation have been well documented and found to occur in a sex dependent fashion. Glucocorticoids, cyclosporine and pre-existing uremic osteodystrophy have been implicated in the pathogenesis of the skeletal lesions. Glucocorticoid induced osteopenia is also a serious clinical problem in patients with various nonrenal diseases and can be prevented, or at least attenuated, by pamidronate and other bisphosphonates. METHOD: We prospectively studied 26 male patients undergoing renal transplantation, and randomized them to receive either placebo or intravenous pamidronate (0.5 mg/kg) at the time of transplantation and again one month later. All patients received immunosuppression comprising prednisolone, cyclosporine and azathioprine. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the second, third and fourth lumbar vertebrae and of the femoral neck was measured at the time of transplantation and at three months and 12 months after transplantation using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). RESULTS: Twelve months after transplantation, the mean (+/- SEM) BMD of the lumbar vertebrae in patients who received placebo had decreased 6.4% (P < 0.05). In contrast, patients who received pamidronate experienced no significant reduction of BMD at the lumbar vertebrae. At the femoral neck, placebo-treated patients showed a reduction of BMD of 9% (P < 0.005), whereas there was no significant change in the pamidronate treated group. The two study groups had similar patient profiles, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) and aluminium concentrations. After transplantation, comparable falls in the serum creatinine and PTH concentration were found in the two groups. Apart from transient hypocalcemia in two patients, no significant adverse effects of pamidronate were noted. CONCLUSION: This study has shown that the early rapid bone loss that occurs in men during the first 12 months after renal transplantation can be prevented by two intravenous doses of pamidronate given at transplantation and one month later. The regimen was simple to administer, well tolerated and potentially applicable to other clinical groups of glucocorticoid treatment patients.     

The effect of intravenous pamidronate versus oral alendronate on bone mineral density in patients with osteoporosis

Intravenous pamidronate is frequently used for the treatment of osteoporosis in patients who cannot tolerate oral bisphosphonates. The aim of the present study was to compare the changes in bone mineral density (BMD) after 1 year of treatment with either oral alendronate or intravenous pamidronate in patients with osteoporosis. We studied 40 consecutive patients starting treatment for osteoporosis: 20 received oral alendronate 10 mg/day and 20 received intravenous pamidronate 60 mg/3 months. Patients were started on intravenous pamidronate in the case of intolerance (within 1 month of start of treatment) of an oral bisphosphonate or in the case of contraindications for an oral bisphosphonate. BMD (spine and total hip) was measured with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at the start of treatment and after 1 year. The BMD of the lumbar spine increased by 4.0% (P<0.05 vs baseline) in both groups, and the BMD of the hip increased by 3.3% and 2.9% (P<0.05 vs baseline) in the alendronate and pamidronate groups, respectively. The increases in BMD of the vertebral spine and the total hip after 1 year are comparable in the alendronate and pamidronate groups. We conclude that intravenous pamidronate can be used successfully as an alternative treatment in patients with gastrointestinal intolerance of an oral bisphosphonate.     

Comparison of the Effect of Denosumab and Alendronate on BMD and Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mass: A Randomized,Blinded, Phase 3 Trial

Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits bone resorption by neutralizing RANKL, a key mediator of osteoclast formation, function, and survival. This phase 3, multicenter, double‐blind study compared the efficacy and safety of denosumab with alendronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. One thousand one hundred eighty‐nine postmenopausal women with a T‐score ≤ ?2.0 at the lumbar spine or total hip were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous denosumab injections (60 mg every 6 mo [Q6M]) plus oral placebo weekly (n = 594) or oral alendronate weekly (70 mg) plus subcutaneous placebo injections Q6M (n = 595). Changes in BMD were assessed at the total hip, femoral neck, trochanter, lumbar spine, and one‐third radius at 6 and 12 mo and in bone turnover markers at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events and laboratory values. At the total hip, denosumab significantly increased BMD compared with alendronate at month 12 (3.5% versus 2.6%; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, significantly greater increases in BMD were observed with denosumab treatment at all measured skeletal sites (12‐mo treatment difference: 0.6%, femoral neck; 1.0%, trochanter; 1.1%, lumbar spine; 0.6%, one‐third radius; p ≤ 0.0002 all sites). Denosumab treatment led to significantly greater reduction of bone turnover markers compared with alendronate therapy. Adverse events and laboratory values were similar for denosumab‐ and alendronate‐treated subjects. Denosumab showed significantly larger gains in BMD and greater reduction in bone turnover markers compared with alendronate. The overall safety profile was similar for both treatments.     

FRAME Study: The Foundation Effect of Building Bone With 1 Year of Romosozumab Leads to Continued Lower Fracture Risk After Transition to Denosumab

Romosozumab is a bone‐forming agent with a dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption. In FRActure study in postmenopausal woMen with ostEoporosis (FRAME), postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received romosozumab 210 mg s.c. or placebo once monthly for 12 months, followed by denosumab 60 mg s.c. once every 6 months in both groups for 12 months. One year of romosozumab increased spine and hip BMD by 13% and 7%, respectively, and reduced vertebral and clinical fractures with persistent fracture risk reduction upon transition to denosumab over 24 months. Here, we further characterize the BMD gains with romosozumab by quantifying the percentages of patients who responded at varying magnitudes; report the mean T‐score changes from baseline over the 2‐year study and contrast these results with the long‐term BMD gains seen with denosumab during Fracture REduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis every 6 Months (FREEDOM) and its Extension studies; and assess fracture incidence rates in year 2, when all patients received denosumab. Among 7180 patients (n = 3591 placebo, n = 3589 romosozumab), most romosozumab‐treated patients experienced ≥3% gains in BMD from baseline at month 12 (spine, 96%; hip, 78%) compared with placebo (spine, 22%; hip, 16%). For romosozumab patients, mean absolute T‐score increases at the spine and hip were 0.88 and 0.32, respectively, at 12 months (placebo: 0.03 and 0.01) and 1.11 and 0.45 at 24 months (placebo‐to‐denosumab: 0.38 and 0.17), with the 2‐year gains approximating the effect of 7 years of continuous denosumab administration. Patients receiving romosozumab versus placebo in year 1 had significantly fewer vertebral fractures in year 2 (81% relative reduction; p < 0.001), with fewer fractures consistently observed across other fracture categories. The data support the clinical benefit of rebuilding the skeletal foundation with romosozumab before transitioning to antiresorptive therapy. © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Evolution of Bone Disease at 2 Years After Transplantation: A Single-Center Study

Posttransplant bone disease is caused by renal osteodystrophy. We sought to examine bone mineral density (BMD) among 90 renal allograft recipients of mean age 42.7 ± 11.4 years to identify factors preventing bone loss at 2 years posttransplant. Subjects treated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus plus azathioprine/MMF and prednisone underwent BMD estimates of the lumbar spine (LS) and of the proximal femur using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at 3 months and every 6 months for 2 years. We assayed markers of bone remodeling: intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), calcitriol, osteocalcin, and carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen on day 3, as well as month 1 and every 6 months after transplantation. At the initial measurement, we observed osteopenia (OSP) among 35% in the LS and 52% in the femur: there was osteoporosis in 8.3%. The prevalence of OSP increased during the first year, thereafter decreasing to the initial value, but the rate of osteoporosis did not change significantly (8.3% vs 6.0%). BMD and Z-score decreased during the first and increased in the second year; 27% of patients regained initial values and 38% higher ones. BMD gains in the LS and femur were observed among subjects with higher calcitriol levels during the first 6 months (P < .01), higher osteocalcin (P < .05), higher estimated glomerular filtration rate during 1–24 months and in the tacrolimus group. Improvement of LS BMD occurred in younger patients (38 vs 46 years; P < .027); BMD gain in the femur correlated with higher levels of iPTH from 1–12 months (P < .01). The tacrolimus group showed higher Z-scores in the LS and femur at 24 months (P < .05). Two years after transplantation >60% of recipients showed stabilization or gain in bone mass. A sufficient calcitriol level in the early transplant period, an adequate iPTH, good renal function, and tacrolimus therapy prevented BMD disease progression.     

Treatment of osteoporosis after liver transplantation with ibandronate

Osteoporosis is a major side‐effect after liver transplantation (LTX). Therefore, the objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of ibandronate to reduce fractures after LTX. Seventy‐four patients after LTX were included in the study and measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar spine and proximal femur using dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA) were performed prior to and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. The study group (IBA) consisted of 34 patients who received calcium (1 g/day), vitamin D3 (800–1000 IE/day) and ibandronate 2 mg every 3 months intravenously for 1 year. The control group consisted of 40 patients (CON) who received calcium and vitamin D3 at the same dosages. Prevalence of new fractures was predefined as primary endpoint. Changes of BMD and biochemical markers of bone metabolism were also investigated. In all patients, we found a reduction of BMD in the first few months after LTX. In the lumbar spine and the proximal femur the maximum reduction occurred 3 and 6 months post‐LTX. One and 2 years after transplantation, the group receiving ibandronate demonstrated a better recovery from loss of BMD and a significantly lower prevalence of fractures (IBA 2 vs. CON 10 P < 0.04, χ²). Ibandronate with calcium and vitamin D3 reduces the BMD‐loss after LTX and decreases the rate of bone fractures significantly.     

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Intravenous Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Thalassemia-Associated Osteopenia

Beta-thalassaemia major is associated with low bone mass and fractures. We conducted a 2 year randomized controlled trial of zoledronic acid 4 mg administered intravenously every 3 months or placebo in the treatment of β-thalassaemia-associated osteopenla. We recruited 23 subjects from 2 university hospitals with a T score of less than −1.0 at either the lumbar spine or hip, and 23 subjects completed the study (17 M, 6 F). Treatment groups did not differ significantly with respect to bone mineral density (BMD), age, height, weight and body mass index (BMI) at baseline. BMD was assessed at baseline, 12 months and 24 months by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine, femoral reek, total hip and total body. After two years average lumbar spine BMD was 8.9% greater (95%CI 2.3–15.5%, P = 0.011), average femoral neck BMD was 9.1% greater (95%CI 5.5–12.7%, P < 0.0001), average total hip BMD was 9.6% greater (95%CI 6.5–12.6%, P < 0.0001) and average total body BMD was 4.7% greater (95%CI 2.7–6.8%, P < 0.0001) in the treated group compared to placebo. The absolute change in BMD from baseline to 2 years and the annualized rate of change of BMD was significantly greater in treated patients at all four sites. Age, gender, height, weight and BMI did not interact with the effect of treatment and so unadjusted data was used. The serum total ALP decreased 45% by 12 months (P = 0.004) and urinary deoxypyridinoline/creatinine ratio decreased 47% by 3 months (NS). We conclude that zoledronic acid (4 mg i.v. 3 monthly) suppresses bone turnover and increases BMD in β-thalassaemia-associated osteopenia.     

Efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal Asian women

Summary

This 6-month study examined the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene 20?mg in postmenopausal Asian women. Bazedoxifene showed statistically significant improvements over placebo in bone mineral density at all skeletal sites evaluated. Bazedoxifene significantly reduced bone turnover and had favorable effects on lipid parameters. Bazedoxifene was safe and well tolerated.

Introduction

This 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study conducted in China, Korea, and Taiwan evaluated the efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal Asian women.

Methods

Generally, healthy postmenopausal Asian women (N?=?487; mean age, 57.2?years; mean lumbar spine bone mineral density [BMD], ?1.1) were randomized to daily therapy with bazedoxifene 20?mg or placebo; all subjects received daily supplemental calcium carbonate 600?mg. The changes from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine (primary end point) and at other skeletal sites, bone turnover markers, and lipid parameters were evaluated at 6?months. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) reporting and physical/gynecologic examination.

Results

At 6?months, women who received bazedoxifene 20?mg had significantly greater BMD compared with those receiving placebo at the lumbar spine (0.41% vs ?0.32%, P?<?0.01), femoral neck (?0.08% vs ?0.69%, P?=?0.014), trochanter (0.50% vs ?0.23%, P?=?0.010), and total hip (?0.03% vs ?0.77%, P?<?0.001), respectively. Bazedoxifene 20?mg was also associated with significant differences from placebo in median percent reductions from baseline in serum C-telopeptide (?21.8%, P?<?0.001) and osteocalcin (?12.9%, P?<?0.001) levels and total (?5.0%, P?<?0.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (?9.5%, P?<?0.001) levels. The incidence of AEs was not different between subjects treated with bazedoxifene and those who received placebo.

Conclusion

Bazedoxifene was generally safe and effective in preventing bone loss in this short-term study of postmenopausal Asian women.     

Differential action of pamidronate on trabecular and cortical bone in women with involutional osteoporosis

Since osteoporotic fractures are mainly related to the diminution of the bone mineral density (BMD), the effect of pamidronate (3-amino-1-hydroxy-propylidene) 1,1-bisphosphonate on the BMD of the spine, proximal femur and radius shaft was evaluated in an initial cohort of 35 postmenopausal women with at least one vertebral fracture due to involutional osteoporosis.Pamidronate was given continuously during 18 months in a daily oral dose of 4.8 to 6.0 mg/kg supplemented with calcium (1 g/day).BMD — measured by dual photon absorptiometry — increased after one year 5.3±1.0% (P<0.001) in lumbar spine and 5.3±1.5% (P<0.001) over trochanter. However no significant changes were observed in the BMD of the femoral neck, Ward's triangle or in the cortical bone of the radius shaft measured by single photon absorptiometry.Pamidronate also decreased significantly urinary hydroxyproline-creatinine excretion after 6 months and thereafter maintained a plateau. After 18 months of treatment the diminution was 42.6±4.9% (P<0.001).The differing effects of pamidronate on the BMD of lumbar spine and proximal femur might be ascribed to dissimilarities between the proportions of trabecular and cortical bone in these. These results suggest that pamidronate may be prescribed to prevent fractures in cases of involutional osteoporosis with a significant decrease of BMD in lumbar spine and/or trochanter.     

Addressing bone quality and bone density after renal transplantation: A prospective evaluation of the evolution of trabecular bone score and bone mineral density over the first 5 years following renal transplantation in Asian patients

The evolution of trabecular bone score (TBS) and bone mineral density (BMD) over the first 5 years after renal transplantation was prospectively evaluated in 164 patients. Dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were performed at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 60 months. Cumulative steroid dose, serum 25(OH)D, calcium, parathyroid hormone, and total ALP levels at these time points were checked. Incident fractures were identified from X‐rays/vertebral fracture assessments. Mean (SD) age, TBS, and lumbar spine BMD at baseline were 47.11 (9.53), 1.424 (0.097), and 0.935 (0.183) gm/cm², respectively. Baseline TBS was lower in tertiary 1.38 (0.07) vs secondary hyperparathyroidism 1.43 (0.01) vs post‐parathyroidectomy 1.46 (0.11); P = .035. Trabecular bone score and BMD significantly decreased from baseline‐>6 months, changes after that at consecutive time points were non‐significant. 11% had incident fractures during the follow‐up period, majority being metatarsal with no vertebral or hip fractures noted. This first prospective evaluation of TBS and BMD evolution at multiple time points over 5 years suggest that microarchitectural and bone density deteriorations post‐renal transplantation stabilize after 6 months. Stabilization of these parameters could partially account for the absence of major fractures noted in this Asian population. Possible genetic and ethnic differences in fracture risk between Asian and Caucasian renal transplant patients have to be explored through large population‐based studies.     

Role of oral pamidronate in preventing bone loss in postmenopausal women

We have performed a 2-year prospective double-masked study to determine whether the bisphosphonate pamidronate can prevent bone loss in postmenopausal women and its optimal dosage regimen. One hundred and twenty-one such women (mean ± SD age 57.6±3.4 years; mean ± SD time since menopause 7.5±3.5 years) were randomized to receive either oral pamidronate (300 mg/day) for 4 weeks every 4 months (group A), oral pamidronate (150 mg/day) for 4 weeks every 2 months (group B) or identical placebo capsules (group C). Bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at the lumbar spine and proximal femur were performed at baseline and at 6-month intervals for 2 years using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. BMD at the lumbar spine (L2–4) increased significantly in groups A and B after 2 years of treatment (mean ± SD 2.8±2.1% and 3.0±2.9% respectively, bothp<0.001) but decreased in the placebo group (–1.6±3.1%,p<0.01). Identical results were seen for BMD at the femoral neck, which increased significantly in groups A and B after 2 years of treatment (1.2±2.3% and 1.3±2.9% respectively, bothp<0.05) but decreased in the placebo group (–1.9±3.9%,p<0.05). There were significant differences over 2 years between the groups at all anatomical sites (lumbar spine, femoral neck and trochanteric region, allp<0.001; Ward's triangle,p<0.01). However, there were no significant differences between groups A and B, suggesting that the two treatment regimens were equally effective in conserving BMD. There were, however, marked differences in tolerability between the two treatment regimens: 13 women (34%) in group A withdrew from the study because of side-effects, but only 5 women (12%) in group B, which was comparable with placebo. These data demonstrate that intermittent oral pamidronate will prevent bone loss from the lumbar spine and proximal femur of postmenopausal women, and that the more frequent but lower dose regimen is well tolerated.     

Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation is Associated with a Preferential Femoral Neck Bone Loss

Osteoporosis is a major complication of organ transplantation. Little is known about the risk of developing osteoporosis in bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients. We studied early and late changes in bone mineral density (BMD), as well as biochemical markers of bone remodeling, in patients at the time of allogeneic BMT (alloBMT) and up to 13 years thereafter. In a cross-sectional study, 102 patients (40 women, 62 men, mean age ± SEM, 38.9 ± 1.6 years) were segregated into a first group (A, n= 48) and evaluated before or during the first weeks (mean ± SD 0.3 ± 0.1 month, range –0.5 to 3 months) following alloBMT, and a second group (B, n= 54) studied 60.1 ± 5.6 months (range 6–156 months) following alloBMT. Lumbar spine (LS) BMD was similar in groups A and B and was within normal limits. In contrast, femoral neck (FN) Z- and T-scores were significantly decreased in group B compared with group A (–0.68 ± 0.14 vs –0.03 ± 0.14 SD and –0.84 ± 0.14 vs –0.22 ± 0.14 SD, respectively; p≤0.002). Osteopenia (T-score between –1 and –2.5 SD) was present in 35% of group A and 43% of group B patients (NS). Osteoporosis (T-score <–2.5 SD) was detected in 7% of group B patients, but in none of those in group A (p= 0.05). In a longitudinal study, 56 subjects were evaluated at the time of alloBMT, and 33 and 23 were studied 6 or 12 months later, respectively (13 women, 20 men, 37.5 ± 1.6 years). All were treated with supplements of calcium and vitamin D. Amenorrheic women received hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Three-monthly pamidronate infusions were given to 15 men and 10 non-amenorrheic women who were osteopenic/osteoporotic or had elevated baseline bone turnover markers. Mean baseline LS and FN Z- and T-scores were within normal range. Six months after BMT, FN BMD decreased by 4.2 ± 0.7% (p<0.001), and whole body BMD and bone mineral content by 1.5 ± 0.4% and 3.1 ± 0.6%, respectively (p≤0.0001). Twelve months after the graft, there was no further significant bone loss and only FN BMD decrease remained significantly different compared with baseline (–5.6 ± 1.1%, p≤0.0001). These results indicate that the risk of decreased BMD is higher for the femoral neck than the lumbar spine and whole body levels in patients with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, and that bone loss occurs mainly during the first 6 months after the graft. Received: 9 February 2001 / Accepted: 23 May 2001     

Androgen-Receptor Blockade Does Not Impair Bone Mineral Density in Adolescent Females

The effect of peripheral androgen hypersensitivity on bone mineral density (BMD) was investigated in a group of adolescent women with idiopathic hirsutism (n= 17; mean age 17.0 ± 1.7 years). The effect of long-term androgen-receptor blockade with flutamide (500 mg daily in two divided doses for 12 months) on BMD was assessed too. BMD was measured at lumbar spine (L2–L4) by a dual energy X-ray densitometer. Before flutamide treatment, patient BMD (1.14 ± 0.07 g/cm²) was not significantly different from that of the control group (1.16 ± 0.12 g/cm², n= 22), and was normal for age and sex (BMD 0.14 ± 0.69 SDS, P= NS vs. 0). After 12 months of treatment, absolute BMD in patients increased (1.18 ± 0.08 g/cm², P < 0.002), but SDS BMD did not change (0.21 ± 0.72, P= NS vs. baseline). Flutamide treatment determined a clinical, marked improvement of androgen hypersensitivity (Ferriman–Gallwey score: before 22.0 ± 6.2; 6 months: 13.2 ± 6.4, P < 0.003; 12 months; 7.6 ± 4.1, P < 0.001; acne score: before 3.8 ± 0.8; 3 months 0.8 ± 0.5, P < 0.001; later disappeared). The serum levels of 3α-androstenediol-glucoronide decreased (before: 8.6 ± 1.1 μg/liter; 12 months: 7.2 ± 1.0 μg/liter, P < 0.02), whereas the other endocrinological parameters did not change. No relationship was found between BMD and clinical or biochemical parameters of hyperandrogenism. We concluded that in adolescent women, peripheral hyperandrogenism is not associated with abnormal BMD; long-term treatment with flutamide, which blocks the androgen receptor, does not alter their BMD. Received: 19 February 96 / Accepted: 31 December 96     

Effect of Twice‐Yearly Denosumab on Prevention of Bone Mineral Density Loss in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

We conducted an open‐label, prospective, randomized trial to assess the efficacy and safety of RANKL inhibition with denosumab to prevent the loss of bone mineral density (BMD) in the first year after kidney transplantation. Ninety kidney transplant recipients were randomized 1:1 2 weeks after surgery to receive denosumab (60 mg at baseline and 6 months) or no treatment. After 12 months, total lumbar spine areal BMD (aBMD) increased by 4.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3–5.9%) in 46 patients in the denosumab group and decreased by ?0.5% (95% CI ?1.8% to 0.9%) in 44 patients in the control group (between‐group difference 5.1% [95% CI 3.1–7.0%], p < 0.0001). Denosumab also increased aBMD at the total hip by 1.9% (95% CI, 0.1–3.7%; p = 0.035) over that in the control group at 12 months. High‐resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography in a subgroup of 24 patients showed that denosumab increased volumetric BMD at the distal tibia and radius (all p < 0.05). Biomarkers of bone turnover (C‐terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, procollagen type I N‐terminal propeptide) markedly decreased with denosumab (all p < 0.0001). Episodes of cystitis and asymptomatic hypocalcemia occurred more often with denosumab, whereas graft function, rate of rejections, and incidence of opportunistic infections were similar. In conclusion, denosumab increased BMD in the first year after kidney transplantation but was associated with more frequent episodes of urinary tract infection.     

Alendronate decreases the fracture risk in patients with prostate cancer on androgen‐deprivation therapy and with severe osteopenia or osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate changes in bone mass and fracture risk in patients with prostate cancer on androgen‐deprivation therapy (ADT) and with a basal T‐score of >?2.0, who were treated with an oral bisphosphonate, as such patients treated with ADT are at increased risk of bone loss and bone fracture.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We selected 61 patients with prostate cancer treated with ADT; 31 were treated with oral alendronate 70 mg once‐weekly and a control group of 30 were not. At baseline and 12 months we measured bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry. All patients had severe osteopenia or osteoporosis at baseline. The risk of femoral neck fracture was calculated at baseline and 12 months (Z‐score 2.7).

RESULTS

Patients treated with alendronate had a significant increase in BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck after 1 year of follow‐up, with mean (sd ) values of 1.06 (0.26) vs 1.01 (0.21) g/cm² at baseline (P < 0.001), and 0.75 (0.07) vs 0.73 (0.07) g/cm² (P = 0.03), respectively, while the control group had a significant loss of BMD at the total hip of 0.79 (0.14) vs 0.81 (0.13) g/cm² (P = 0.03). BMD was significantly improved at the three locations in patients treated with alendronate compared with the control group, with differences at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip of 0.05 (0.07) vs 0.01 (0.10) (P = 0.001), 0.01 (0.04) vs ?0.002 (0.03) (P = 0.04) and 0.01 (0.04) vs ?0.01 (0.02) g/cm², respectively (P = 0.001). Patients treated with alendronate had a significant decrease in the fracture risk at the femoral neck, by ?0.54 (1.29) (P = 0.04) after 1 year of follow‐up.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with once‐weekly 70 mg alendronate significantly improved the BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck in patients with prostate cancer with severe osteopenia or osteoporosis and on ADT, and significantly decreased the risk of femoral neck fracture.     

Alendronate for osteoporosis in men with androgen-repleted hypogonadism

Male hypogonadism is associated with low bone mineral density (BMD) and an increased risk of fractures. Testosterone replacement therapy improves BMD in young hypogonadal men. This effect is milder in older patients, who are at greater risk for fractures. We studied the effects of alendronate or placebo on BMD in 22 osteoporotic men, 29–69 years of age (mean, 50.2±11.2 years) with long-standing hypogonadism, receiving standard testosterone replacement treatment. Alendronate 10 mg daily ( n =11) increased lumbar-spine BMD by 6.0 and 8.4% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, compared with –0.5% at 6 months and +3.3% at 12 months in the placebo group ( n =11; P <0.005). Alendronate also increased mean femoral-neck BMD by 1.9% after 1 year, compared to a 1.4% decrease with placebo ( P <0.005), and increased the total body bone mineral content by 4.4%, compared to a 0.6% decrease with placebo ( P =0.07). After 6 months alendronate suppressed urinary deoxypyridinoline by 50% ( P <0.005), compared to a 24% decrease in the placebo group. Both the alendronate and placebo groups continued with alendronate 70 mg once weekly for the following 2 years. Lumbar-spine BMD during this open-label study phase did not change significantly in the group originally treated with alendronate, but continued to increase in the placebo-alendronate group by 5.4, 6.5, and 6.2% after 18 (6 months of alendronate), 24 and 36 months, respectively ( P <0.05). Femoral-neck BMD continued to increase in both groups receiving active therapy; in the alendronate-alendronate group by 3.7, 2.7, and 5.2% after 18, 24, and 36 months, respectively ( P =0.01), and in the placebo-alendronate group by 0.7 and 1.9% at 24 (first 12 months of alendronate) and 36 months, respectively ( P <0.05). Our results support the long-term administration of alendronate along with testosterone replacement to men with hypogonadism-induced osteoporosis.     

The role of tacrolimus (FK506)-based immunosuppression on bone mineral density and bone turnover after cardiac transplantation: a prospective, longitudinal, randomized, double-blind trial with calcitriol

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (FK506) is a new immunosuppressive drug in organ transplantation that has demonstrated experimentally to be more deleterious on bone mineral metabolism than cyclosporine. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the effects of a tacrolimus-based immunosuppression on the skeleton and to investigate in a prospective, longitudinal, randomized, double-blind, study the effect of 0.25 microg calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) versus placebo in the prevention of bone loss and fracture rate after heart transplantion (HTx). METHODS: A total of 53 patients (5 female, 48 male, mean age: 53+/-11 years) were randomized to the study medication. Basic therapy included calcium and sex hormone replacement in hypogonadism. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) were performed at baseline, after 12 and 24 months. Biochemical indexes of mineral metabolism were measured every 3 months. RESULTS: Overall bone mineral density (BMD) was significantly decreased after HTx (T-score-LS: 89+/-13%; FN: 88+/-14%). LS-BMD (% change in g/cm2) increased significantly within the study period in the calcitriol group (12 months: 7.1+/-8.1%, P<0.01; 24 months: 14.0+/-10.1%, P<0.01) and showed a positive trend in the placebo group (12 months: 4.5+/-9.3%, NS; 24 months: 6.2+/-8.0%, NS). FN-BMD in the calcitriol group was stable (12 months: -2.1+/-4.2%; NS; 24 months: -0.9+/-3.2%, NS). FN-BMD in the placebo group decreased significantly within the first 12 month follow-up period (-7.3+/-5.4; P<0.05) and stabilized within 2 years (-8.0+/-4.1%; P < 0.05). Fracture incidence was low during the study interval (first year: 5.0%, second year: 0%). Bone resorption markers decreased significantly during calcitriol therapy. CONCLUSIONS: High dose tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen is associated with a rapid bone loss early after cardiac transplantation. Beyond the first 6 months after HTx, calcium, vitamin D, and hormone supplementation in hypogonadism lead sufficiently to bone mineral recovery. Besides immunosuppression, both concomitant hypogonadism and secondary hyperparathyroidism play a major role for the bone loss and should be therefore monitored and treated adequately. Low dose calcitriol should be substituted for at least 2 years as additional antiresorptive therapy.