腹腔镜手术治疗食管裂孔疝45例

目的探讨腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合抗反流手术治疗食管裂孔疝的疗效。方法 2004年5月~2008年11月45例食管裂孔疝行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合抗反流手术。采用视觉模拟积分(visual analogue scales,VAS)评价术前及术后1、6、12个月胃食管反流症状,包括烧心、吞咽梗阻、反酸、胸痛、嗳气等。结果在缝合缩小食管裂孔的同时,行改良Nissen术9例,Toupet术10例,Dor术26例。无中转开腹。手术时间92~203min,平均118min。术后住院2~8d,平均2.7d。术后发生胃潴留3例,吞咽梗阻2例。术后随访1~48个月,平均21.5月,2例分别在术后1、12个月复发。胃食管反流综合症状VAS评分术前中位数5分(4~8分),术后1、6、12个月中位数均为1分,术前后比较均有统计学意义(P=0.000)。结论腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合抗反流手术是治疗食管裂孔疝的有效方法 ,具有创伤小、恢复快的特点。     

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片(Bard CruraSoft PTFE/ePTFE Mesh)行食管裂孔疝修补和部分胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝的临床效果。方法2006年8月~2007年4月,对13例食管裂孔疝(Ⅰ型6例,Ⅲ型7例)腹腔镜下用超声刀进行食管裂孔疝游离、腔内缝合器行补片固定完成食管裂孔疝修补术并同期行部分胃底折叠术。结果13例手术全部获得成功,无中转开腹手术。手术时间115~185min,平均142min;术中出血量25~120ml,平均75ml。术后平均32h(26~37h)排气并开始进流质饮食。术后住院3~6d,平均4d。13例术后随访4~11个月,平均6.5月,术后1个月临床症状完全消失,13例手术后3个月行钡餐造影检查未见疝复发。结论腹腔镜下应用补片行食管裂孔疝修补和部分胃底折叠手术是一种安全有效的微创方法,具有临床推广的价值。     

腹腔镜在先天性食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用

目的探讨腹腔镜手术治疗小儿食管裂孔疝的安全性和疗效。方法2001年9月～2008年12月对7例小儿食管裂孔疝施行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合胃底折叠术（Nissen法）。1例因术前上消化道造影发现合并胃排空延迟,联合实施了腹腔镜幽门成形术。1例合并右腹股沟斜疝同时行腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术。1例术中发现合并副脾,未给予处理。结果7例患儿均在腹腔镜下完成食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术（Nissen法）,无中转开腹者。手术时间平均94.2min（75～150min）;术中出血量平均5ml（2～10ml）,无术中术后输血者。术后24～48h进奶或进食。术后住院3～7d,平均4.5d。7例患儿术后随访6～20个月,平均12.6月。1例术后第10天出现呕吐,给予食管扩张和胃动力药物治疗后好转;1例术后1年复发,再次行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合Nissen胃底折叠术治愈;其余5例术后恢复顺利,无并发症发生。结论腹腔镜治疗食管裂孔疝创伤小,安全性好,疗效确切,可以联合治疗其他疾病,应注意适应证的选择。     

腹腔镜下治疗食管裂孔疝55例报告

目的：探讨腹腔镜下治疗食管裂孔疝的可行性和有效性。方法2008年3月～2013年3月腹腔镜手术治疗55例食管裂孔疝,腹腔镜下完成食管裂孔疝的还纳及修补之后,进一步行胃底折叠术。结果55例均在腹腔镜下完成手术,在食管裂孔修补基础上辅以不同的胃底折叠术,其中Nissen胃底折叠术17例,Toupet 胃底折叠术19例,Dor胃底折叠术19例。3种术式的手术时间：Nissen术式（69．6±13．0）min,Toupet术式（68．0±8．2）min,Dor术式（63．8±10．1）min;3种术式的术中出血量：Nissen术式（20．0±5．8）ml,Toupet术式（20．6±9．5）ml,Dor术式（21．7±5．0）ml,无一例输血;3种术式的术后拔管时间：Nissen术式（3．1±1．1） d,Toupet术式（2．7±0．7） d,Dor术式（2．3±1．1） d;3种术式的术后住院时间：Nissen术式（9．1±4．9）d,Toupet术式（8．4±2．6）d,Dor术式（7．6±1．5）d。术后患者的临床症状均得到有效缓解,无围术期死亡,3例（5．4％）出现术后并发症,其中2例胃排空障碍,1例吞咽困难,治疗后均缓解。55例中位随访时间45个月（6～60个月）,口服钡餐造影或胃镜等检查无食管裂孔疝复发,无食管狭窄和食管憩室发生。结论腹腔镜下治疗食管裂孔疝安全有效,可根据病人的情况选择不同的胃底折叠术。     

Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair in 221 Patients: Outcomes and Experience

Background and Objectives:

Hiatal hernia is a common condition often associated with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The objectives of this study were to examine the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHHR) with biologic mesh to reduce and/or alleviate GERD symptoms and associated hiatal hernia recurrence.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive LHHR procedures with biologic mesh performed by a single surgeon from July 2009 to October 2014. The primary efficacy outcome measures were relief from GERD symptoms, as measured according to the GERD–health-related quality-of-life (GERD-HRQL) scale and hiatal hernia recurrence. A secondary outcome measure was overall safety of the procedure.

Results:

A total of 221 patients underwent LHHR with biologic mesh during the study period, and pre- and postoperative GERD-HRQL studies were available for 172 of them. At baseline (preoperative), the mean GERD-HRQL score for all procedures was 18.5 ± 14.4. At follow-up (mean, 14.5 ± 11.0 months [range, 2.0–56.0]), the score showed a statistically significant decline to a mean of 4.4 ± 7.5 (P < .0001). To date, 8 patients (3.6%, 8/221) have had a documented anatomic hiatal hernia recurrence. However, a secondary hiatal hernia repair reoperation was necessary in only 1 patient. Most complications were minor (dysphagia, nausea and vomiting). However, there was 1 death caused by a hemorrhage that occurred 1 week after surgery.

Conclusions:

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair using biologic mesh, both with and without a simultaneous bariatric or antireflux procedure, is an efficacious and safe therapeutic option for management of hiatal hernia, prevention of recurrence, and relief of symptomatic GERD.     

Safe Esophageal Bougie Placement for Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair

The increased use of laparoscopy for treatment of reflux esophagitis has been associated with a 1-8% complication rate. Perforation of the esophagus from bougie placement, wrap breakdown or too tight a wrap are some of the complications seen from this surgery. An esophageal dilator system was developed to overcome these problems. Thirty patients had an esophageal dilator system used whereby a 48F or 58F dilator was placed over a 18F orogastric tube. Intraoperative gastroscopy documented a properly created wrap. There were no esophageal perforations or morbidity associated with the dilator.     

Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair. How I do it

Introduction  The approach to paraesophageal hernias has changed radically over the last 15 years, both in terms of indications for the repair and of surgical technique. Discussion  Today we operate mostly on patients who are symptomatic and the laparoscopic repair has replaced in most cases the open approach through either a laparotomy or a thoracotomy. The following describes a step by step approach to the laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Presented at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, San Diego, California, May 17–21, 2008     

开放与腹腔镜无张力疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的对比研究

目的比较开放和腹腔镜完全腹膜外无张力疝修补治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效。方法 2006年1月～2010年1月136例老年腹股沟疝行开腹无张力填充式腹股沟疝修补术（开放组,n=72）或腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术（totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty,TEP）（TEP组,n=64）,比较2种术式疗效。结果开放组手术时间（65.3±18.1）min,明显短于TEP组（78.1±12.6）min（t=4.742,P=0.000）。开放组住院费用（4960.2±1033.3）元,明显低于TEP组（6998.0±1632.2）元（t=8.796,P=0.000）。开放组术后24 h和1周疼痛评分明显高于TEP组（Z=-7.144,P=0.000;Z=-6.408,P=0.000）;术后住院时间（4.9±2.4）d明显长于TEP组（3.6±1.5）d（t=-3.733,P=0.000）。136例无严重并发症。开放组72例随访8～46个月,平均15个月,其中〉24个月11例;TEP组64例随访4～35个月,平均14个月,其中〉24个月9例,2组均无术后复发。结论 2种术式治疗老年腹股沟疝是安全有效的。TEP疼痛轻,恢复快,应首选,尤其适用于双侧腹股沟疝修补;开放无张力疝修补术费用低,易开展,非常适用于合并有心肺疾病无法耐受全麻或CO2气腹的老年患者。     

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an alternative for recurrent paraesophageal hernias in obese patients.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent paraesophageal hernias in obese patients are technically challenging and have a high recurrence rate. We sought to develop an alternative to the traditional approaches for this problem. This article describes the use of a sleeve gastrectomy in an obese patient with a large recurrent paraesophageal hernia. CASE REPORT: A morbidly obese 70-year-old woman presented with a 1-year history of chest pain, cough, dysphagia, and dyspnea. She had undergone an open paraesophageal hernia repair 8 years earlier. Diagnostic workup revealed a recurrent large paraesophageal hernia. Laparoscopically, we took down all adhesions, excised the hernia sac, reduced the stomach and distal esophagus into the abdomen, and closed the hiatus. We then resected the greater curvature and fundus of the stomach, leaving the lesser curve in a sleeve configuration. Eighteen months after the operation, the patient's chest pain, cough, dyspnea, and dysphagia were resolved. In addition, she has lost 57 pounds (255 to 198). CONCLUSION: A sleeve gastrectomy is a potentially useful alternative to fundoplication or gastropexy, or both of these, in the treatment of obese patients with complex paraesophageal hernias.     

Laparoscopic management of large paraesophageal hiatal hernia

Background: Large paraesophageal hernias (POHs) predominantly occur in the elderly population. Early repair is recommended to avoid the risks associated with gastric volvulus. Methods: Data were collected prospectively during an 8-year period. Laparoscopic repair of POHs initially included circumcision of the sac and mesh hiatal repair. Sac excision and suture hiatal repair were later adopted. A fundoplication was also included, initially as a selective procedure. Results: Fifty-three patients with large POHs were treated by one surgeon. All had attempted laparoscopic repair, with four conversions to an open procedure. Symptomatic hernia recurrence occurred in five patients (9%). The 21 patients who had sac excision, hiatal repair, and fundoplication have remained free of symptomatic recurrence. The postoperative morbidity rate was 13%, with one death. Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair of large POHs remains feasible. We advocate complete sac excision, hiatal repair, fundoplication, and gastropexy to prevent early recurrence.     

Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair Versus Open Repair in Boys with Inguinal Hernia: A Meta-Analysis

ObjectivePediatric inguinal hernia is a common surgical problem in boys. Open hernia repair surgery (OH) has been traditionally used to treat this condition, but it leads to complications, such as testicular complications. Laparoscopic hernia repair by using the extraperitoneal method (LHE) is performed through the percutaneous insertion of sutures and extracorporeal closure of patent vaginalis processus; thus, injury to spermatic cord structures is avoided. However, a meta-analysis comparing LHE and OH is lacking.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies. A meta-analysis of the retrieved studies was performed, and a random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effect size. The primary outcome was testicular complications, including ascending testis, hydrocele, and testicular atrophy. The secondary outcomes were surgical metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH), ipsilateral hernia recurrence, and operation time.ResultsIn total, 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 20 non-RCTs involving 17,555 boys were included. The incidence of ascending testis (risk ratio [RR]: 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18–0.78; p = 0.008) and MCIH (RR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07–0.43; p = 0.0002) was significantly lower in LHE than in OH. The incidence of hydrocele, testicular atrophy, and ipsilateral hernia recurrence did not differ between LHE and OH.ConclusionCompared with OH, LHE led to fewer or equivalent testicular complications without increasing ipsilateral hernia recurrence. Moreover, MCIH incidence was lower in LHE than in OH. Hence, LHE could be a feasible choice with less invasiveness for inguinal hernia repair in boys.Level of EvidenceTreatment study, LEVEL III.     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术的前瞻性随机对照研究

目的探讨腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术和Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术的安全性、可行性及各自优缺点。方法采用前瞻性随机对照研究将2005年3月～2010年3月252例成人腹股沟疝采用信封法随机分成TAPP组（n=84）、TEP组（n=84）及Lichtenstein组（n=84）,比较3组手术时间、术后疼痛评分、术后阴囊血清肿或积液、术后局部皮肤感觉障碍、术后慢性疼痛、术后远期疝复发及住院费用等。结果 168例腹腔镜手术均顺利完成,无中转开放手术。TAPP组和TEP组术后疼痛评分明显低于Lichtenstein组[（2.94±0.99）分vs.（4.25±0.46）分,q=16.434,P〈0.05;（1.98±0.64）分vs.（4.25±0.46）分,q=28.477,P〈0.05],住院费用明显高于Lichtenstein组[（9504±1132）元vs.（5852±864）元,q=33.481,P〈0.05;（9351±985）元vs.（5852±864）元,q=32.079,P〈0.05]。TAPP组和TEP组术后均无复发,显著低于Lichtenstein组4.8%（4/84）（P=0.012）。3组手术时间、术后阴囊血清肿或积液、术后局部皮肤感觉障碍、术后慢性疼痛无明显差异（P〉0.05）。结论腹腔镜疝修补术,无论是TAPP还是TEP都是安全可行的,在术后疼痛评分、术后复发方面方面要明显优于Lichtenstein术式,但腹腔镜疝修补术手术费用较高。     

Obturator Hernia: Laparoscopic Diagnosis and Repair

Objective:

Review of international literature reveals eight reported cases of laparoscopic obturator hernia repair. Non-specific signs and symptoms make the diagnosis of an obturator hernia difficult. Laparoscopic intervention provides a minimally invasive method to simultaneously diagnose and repair these hernias.

Methods and Procedures:

A 35 year old woman presented with lower abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, and dyspareunia. During gynecological diagnostic laparoscopy, a pelvic floor hernia was suspected, and a general surgical evaluation was sought. At a subsequent laparoscopy, the diagnosis of a left direct inguinal and a right obturator hernia was made. Both were repaired laparoscopically with polypropylene mesh.

Results:

At follow-up at one and six weeks postoperatively, the patient''s complaints of pain had completely resolved.

Conclusion:

The diagnosis of obturator hernia is problematic. The usual presenting signs and symptoms are non-specific. Without conclusive historical or physical findings, laparoscopy is an excellent method for diagnosing obturator hernia. This entity, once diagnosed laparoscopically, can be repaired simultaneously via laparoscopic mesh technique.     

腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片植入术治疗腹股沟疝269例报告

目的探讨腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片植入术(total extraperitoneal repair,TEP)治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果与经验。方法2004年4月~2006年8月硬膜外麻醉或全麻下,采用食指钝性分离建立空间行腹腔镜TEP治疗腹股沟疝269例(294例次),其中斜疝175例,直疝40例,双侧疝25例,复发疝29例。结果手术均获成功,无中转开放手术;手术时间(63.1±37.5)min,术中出血量(12.3±8.2)ml,术后住院时间(3.7±1.4)d,腹膜撕裂发生率8.2%(24/269),腹股沟血肿发生率2.4%(4/269),异物感发生0.7%(2/269)。269例随访6~12个月(中位时间9个月),复发率1.0%(3/294)。结论TEP治疗腹股沟疝是安全、有效的手术方法。     

小切口辅助腹腔镜巨大腹壁切口疝修补术的探讨

目的总结小切口辅助腹腔镜巨大切口疝修补术的经验。方法 2008年6月-2009年12月,采用小切口辅助腹腔镜修补巨大切口疝15例,疝环（12.3±3.4）cm,采用小切口切除疝囊并进行腹壁塑形。结果 15例均顺利完成手术,手术时间100-150 min,（123.3±15.9）min。小切口长度5-8 cm,（6.0±0.9）cm。术中发现隐匿疝6例,一并予以修补。浆液肿1例。术后住院时间4-8 d,（5.3±1.2）d。1例术后疼痛持续〉3个月,无切口感染和肠道及腹腔脏器损伤。全组随访12-30个月,（19.9±4.7）月,无复发。结论小切口辅助腹腔镜修补巨大切口疝是一种安全可靠的手术方法,术后并发症少,达到了腹壁塑形的效果。     

Type IV Hiatal Hernia Post Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: Report of a Case

A postoperative hiatal hernia is a rare but serious complication of fundoplication. We report herein a 62-year-old female who presented with abdominal pain and vomiting 2 years following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. At laparotomy, the stomach and the transverse colon were intrathoracic (type IV hiatal hernia); the esophageal hiatus was markedly dilated with no evidence that they had been approximated. At 18 months follow-up, she is doing very well apart from occasional heartburn. A high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose postoperative hiatal hernias. A routine closure of the crura with nonabsorbable suture material and an avoidance of iatrogenic pneumothorax may help to reduce the occurrence of this problem. Received: March 3, 2000 / Accepted: July 25, 2000     

腹腔镜下复合补片修补耻骨上切口疝(附25例报道)

目的总结腹腔镜下耻骨上切口疝修补的手术方法及效果。方法回顾性分析2007年3月至2010年10月期间笔者所在科室25例行腹腔镜下耻骨上切口疝修补术患者的临床资料。男13例,女12例;年龄35～83岁,中位年龄52岁;其中2例是复发疝。疝缺损下缘距耻骨弓距离均小于5 cm。在直视下采用螺旋钉枪将补片固定到腹壁上,补片下边缘须低于耻骨弓2 cm并将其固定到耻骨弓及双侧的耻骨梳韧带上。结果 25例患者均成功完成腹腔镜下切口疝修补,无中转开腹。疝缺损最大径为6.1～12.5 cm,平均9.5 cm。手术时间为90～180 min,平均128 min。总并发症发生率为28%(7/25)。包括术中膀胱损伤1例;术后补片上方浆液肿4例,经局部穿刺抽吸后消失;术后修补区域腹壁疼痛2例,未行特殊处理于术后1个月内逐渐缓解并消失。22例患者获随访,随访率为88%,随访时间为6～48个月,平均30个月,1例于术后2个月复发,复发率为4%。结论腹腔镜下耻骨上切口疝修补是一种安全有效的方法,其网片重叠缺损边缘至少超过5 cm,网片下边缘必须在直视下固定到双侧耻骨梳韧带上,这样可以增加固定的强度并降低修补术后复发率。