Safety of early antiplatelet administration in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with alteplase (SEAPT-24)

ObjectivesAlteplase, a tissue-type plasminogen activator, is recommended for ischemic stroke patients presenting within 4.5 h. Due to bleeding risks, current guidelines advise delaying antiplatelet therapy for 24 h after alteplase. However, specific scenarios may require antiplatelet therapy to be given within the 24 h window. This study aimed to examine the safety of early antiplatelet therapy administration within the first 24 h after alteplase.Materials and methodsThis study is a retrospective, observational study of adult patients with acute ischemic stroke who received alteplase across a multi-hospital system. Patients were grouped based on early antiplatelet therapy (within 24 h window) or as recommended per guidelines. The occurrence of bleeding events, including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and/or gastrointestinal bleeding, in-hospital mortality, unfavorable outcomes (modified Rankin score 3–6), and hospital length of stay, were compared between groups.ResultsPatients were predominantly African American (72%) and female (53%) with a median age of 62 years. Median baseline NIHSS scores were higher in the early group (5 vs. 7; p = 0.04), and patients in the early group were more likely to undergo endovascular therapy (26% vs. 8%, p < 0.0001). In patients treated with alteplase only and who did not undergo endovascular therapy, there was no difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (1.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.1), gastrointestinal bleeding, in-hospital mortality, unfavorable outcomes, or length of stay.ConclusionsIn our retrospective analysis, early administration of antiplatelet therapy (< 24 h post-alteplase) did not increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, or unfavorable outcomes in patients who received alteplase alone for management of acute ischemic stroke. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.     

Utilization and Outcomes of Acute Revascularization Treatments in Ischemic Stroke Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection

ObjectivesAcute ischemic stroke patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus maybe candidates for acute revascularization treatments (intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy).Materials and MethodsWe analyzed the data from 62 healthcare facilities to determine the odds of receiving acute revascularization treatments in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infected patients and determined the odds of composite of death and non-routine discharge with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infected and non-infected patients undergoing acute revascularization treatments after adjusting for potential confounders.ResultsAcute ischemic stroke patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection were significantly less likely to receive acute revascularization treatments (odds ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.5–0.8, p = 0.0001). Among ischemic stroke patients who received acute revascularization treatments, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection was associated with increased odds of death or non-routine discharge (odds ratio 3.0, 95% confidence interval 1.8–5.1). The higher odds death or non-routine discharge (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.9–2.3) with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection were observed in all ischemic stroke patients without any modifying effect of acute revascularization treatments (interaction term for death (p = 0.9) or death or non-routine discharge (p = 0.2).ConclusionsPatients with acute ischemic stroke with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection were significantly less likely to receive acute revascularization treatments. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus infection was associated with a significantly higher rate of death or non-routine discharge among acute ischemic stroke patients receiving revascularization treatments.     

Safety and effectiveness of CATCH+ as a first-line device for revascularization in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke

PurposeMechanical thrombectomy devices and stent retrievers have recently been advocated for use as first-line therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Here we evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the CATCH+ stent retriever as a percutaneous thrombectomy device.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 101 consecutive patients who presented with anterior or posterior intracranial vessel occlusion and were treated with the CATCH+ intracranial system, either alone or in combination with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, at a single treatment center. The primary outcome measure was successful post-procedural reperfusion as classified by the mTICI score. Secondary endpoints included mortality rate, incidence of adverse events, and functional outcomes evaluated at discharge using the mRS score.ResultsSixty-nine (68.3%) patients received thrombolysis prior to mechanical thrombectomy. Successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥ 2b) was achieved in 73.3% of patients at the end of the procedure, and good functional outcomes (mRS ≤ 2) were observed in 32.7% of patients at discharge. Three patients developed asymptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, two developed asymptomatic dissections of the internal carotid artery, and one patient developed a symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Seventeen patients died (mortality rate 16.8%).ConclusionsThe CATCH+ device is a safe and effective mechanical thrombectomy device for the first-line treatment of acute ischemic stroke.     

急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗21例临床分析

目的探讨急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗的方法、疗效和安全性。方法回顾性分析血管内治疗的大血管闭塞的急性缺血性脑卒中患者21例。10例为阿替普酶静脉溶栓后桥接血管内治疗,11例直接行血管内治疗。其中机械取栓12例,机械取栓+支架植入3例,单纯颈动脉支架植入3例,机械取栓+动脉溶栓1例,机械取栓+动脉溶栓+支架植入1例,单纯动脉溶栓1例。评估术中mTICI再通等级、并发症及术后随访第90天m RS评分,分析疗效与安全性。结果21例患者前循环卒中18例,后循环卒中3例。NIHSS评分平均15. 81±6. 44分。20例患者术后血管再通达mTICI 2 b-3级。术中并发出血1例,术后大量颅内出血1例,无症状少量颅内出血4例。术后高灌注综合征8例,其中4例行去骨瓣减压术,最终死亡5例(23. 81%)。术后随访第90天mRS评分0～2分8例。结论经充分评估并及时采取适宜的单一或多种血管内治疗方法对于大血管闭塞导致的急性缺血性脑卒中患者安全有效。     

Safety and Efficacy of Repeated Thrombolysis with Alteplase in Early Recurrent Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review

Background and Aim: The current American Heart Association guidelines for the management of acute ischemic stroke advise against the use of intravenous (IV) alteplase in patients with recurrent stroke occurring within 90 days of their index event. Following these guidelines strictly, patients having early recurrent ischemic stroke would be unable to avail of this reperfusion strategy that has been proven to confer superior clinical outcomes. While some registry-based studies have demonstrated the safety of IV alteplase in this subgroup of patients, data on the repeated use of the drug are lacking. Thus, we aim to determine the safety and efficacy of repeated thrombolysis in patients with early recurrent ischemic strokes. Methods: The following electronic databases were searched for relevant studies: the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials by The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE by PubMed, Health Research and Development Information Network, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Data on symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, 90-day clinical outcomes, systemic hemorrhage and allergic reactionswere synthesized. Results: Ten articles with 33 patients in total were included in our review. One patient developed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after the second reperfusion attempt and subsequently died from pneumonia. Another died from spontaneous rupture of previously unidentified infrarenal aortic aneurysm. Six of the 13 patients with available follow-up data had good clinical outcomes (Modified Rankin Score 0-2). There were no allergic reactions and other drug-related adverse events noted. Conclusions: Repeated IV alteplase can be safe and efficacious in patients who have early recurrent ischemic stroke. Larger studies, trials, or registry-based data are needed to ascertain the encouraging findings of our review.     

Endovascular therapy including thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

One of the primary strategies for the management of acute ischemic stroke is intravenous (IV) thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). Over the past decade, endovascular therapies such as the use of stent retrievers to perform mechanical thrombectomy have been found to improve functional outcomes compared to t-PA alone. We aimed to reassess the functional outcomes and complications of IV thrombolysis with and without endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke using conventional meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the effect of IV thrombolysis with and without endovascular therapy on functional outcome, mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). Trial sequential analysis was done to strengthen the meta-analysis. We analyzed six randomized controlled trials involving 1943 patients. Patients who received IV thrombolysis with endovascular treatment showed significantly higher rates of excellent functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0–1) (RR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.29–2.39]) compared to those who received IV thrombolysis alone. A similar association was seen for good functional outcomes (mRS 0–2) (RR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.24–1.96]). Trial sequential analysis demonstrated endovascular treatment increased the RR of a good functional outcome by at least 30% compared to IV thrombolysis alone. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality for mechanical thrombectomy compared to IV thrombolysis alone or the incidence of SICH at 3 month follow-up. Endovascular treatment is more likely to result in a better functional outcome for patients compared to IV thrombolysis alone for acute ischemic stroke.     

Caught in Action – Evolving Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion and Collateral Failure During Alteplase Infusion for Acute Ischemic Stroke

BackgroundPublished reports of acute deterioration during alteplase infusion for acute ischemic stroke due to development of partial to complete large vessel occlusion and collateral failure are sparce.Materials and methodsWe describe an 84-year-old patient with a fluctuating clinical course due to evolving emergent large vessel occlusion of right M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery and collateral failure during alteplase infusion. Potential mechanisms of acute deterioration within 24 h after thrombolysis are discussed.ResultsUrgent mechanical thrombectomy was performed with resultant partial recanalization and small volume residual infarcts at 72 h magnetic resonance imaging of brain.ConclusionsProgression from partial to complete occlusion may occur within minutes, even during administration of intravenous thrombolytics in hyper-acute stroke. In patients who deteriorate within 24 h of stroke onset, non-contrast CT of brain, followed by CT perfusion and angiography, is the imaging protocol of choice in the mechanical thrombectomy era.     

Safety of Mechanical Thrombectomy with Combined Intravenous Thrombolysis in Stroke Treatment 4.5 to 9 Hours from Symptom Onset

BackgroundAn extended time window for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute stroke patients up to 9 hours from symptom onset has been established in recent trials, excluding patients who received mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We therefore investigated whether combined therapy with IVT and MT (IVT+MT) is safe in patients with ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) in an extended time window.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with anterior circulation ischemic stroke and LVO who were treated within 4.5 to 9 hours after symptom onset using MT with or without IVT. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders.ResultsIn total, 168 patients were included in the study, 44 (26%) were treated with IVT+ MT. 133 (79%) patients had a M1-/distal carotid artery occlusion. Median ASPECT-Score was 8 (IQR 7-10) and complete reperfusion (mTICI 2b-3) was achieved in 132 (79%) patients. 18 (41%) of the patients in the IVT+MT group developed any ICH vs. 45 (36%) patients in the direct MT group (p=0.587). Symptomatic ICH occurred in 5 (11%) patients with IVT+MT vs. 8 (6%) patients receiving direct MT (p=0.295). In multivariable analysis, IVT+MT was not an independent predictor of ICH (adjusted for NIHSS, degree of reperfusion, symptom-onset-to-treatment time and therapy with tirofiban; OR 0.95 [95% CI 0.43-2.08], p=0.896).ConclusionMechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients seems to be safe with combined intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 to 9 hours after onset as it did not significantly increase the risk for intracranial hemorrhage.     

Malformation vasculaire cérébrale découverte dans le bilan pré-thrombolyse d’un infarctus cérébral. Impact sur la décision thérapeutique

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke is contraindicated in patients harboring an asymptomatic intracranial vascular malformation, whether it is incidentally discovered at the time of the initial cerebral imaging or previously known. Because thrombolysis is associated with a risk of serious intracerebral hemorrhage, it is theoretically possible that this treatment increases the risk of bleeding or rupture of these malformations. However, this risk seems very low in clinical practice. We report two cases, one with a probable brainstem cavernous malformation treated with alteplase for a supratentorial ischemic stroke who developed just after treatment a fatal brainstem hemorrhage, and another one with asymptomatic dural arteriovenous fistula, treated by endovascular thrombectomy solely. This approach was safe and effective, and the patient had an endovascular embolization of the fistula one month later as it became symptomatic. Based on the literature, we discuss the bleeding risk of asymptomatic intracranial vascular malformations in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with alteplase, depending on the type of malformation (intracranial aneurysm, arteriovenous and cavernous malformation or fistula), and the alternative therapeutic options.     

Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c Predicts Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Acute Ischemic Stroke Post-Mechanical Thrombectomy

BackgroundIntracerebral hemorrhage, including symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, is a serious post-mechanical thrombectomy complication in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We aimed to determine whether glycosylated hemoglobin A1c parameters could predict intracerebral hemorrhage in this patient population.MethodsWe enrolled patients with acute occlusion of the internal carotid artery or proximal middle cerebral artery and who had undergone mechanical thrombectomy. According to the glycosylated hemoglobin A1c level (%) assessed during the hospital stay, the patients were divided into two groups: > 6.5% and ≤ 6.5%. Intracerebral hemorrhage was evaluated and classified based on cranial computed tomography scans obtained within 24–48 h or when neurological conditions worsened. We assessed the outcome at the end of 90 days using the modified Rankin Scale scores.ResultsAmong 202 patients, 86 (42.6%) suffered intracerebral hemorrhage, while 25 (12.4%) had symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage; 35.6% of the patients had a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale scores 0–2). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an association of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c > 6.5% with intracerebral hemorrhage. Furthermore, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c > 6.5% was independently associated with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR, 2.136; 95% CI, 1.279–3.567; P = 0.004). In addition, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c > 6.5% was significantly associated with increased mortality (OR, 1.511; 95% CI, 1.042–2.191; P = 0.029) and negatively associated with favorable outcome (OR, 0.480; 95% CI, 0.296–0.781; P = 0.003) at 90 days.ConclusionsGlycosylated hemoglobin A1c is an independent predictor of intracerebral hemorrhage (specifically, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage) in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.     

Benefits and Safety of Periprocedural Heparin During Thrombectomy in Patients Contra-Indicated for Alteplase

Backround and PurposeRole of peri-procedural heparin as an adjuvant treatment during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for patients contra-indicated for alteplase remains a source of debate.MethodsWe included patients from the multicenter French register ETIS that underwent MT without administration of alteplase, and compared patients who received heparin during MT with patients who did not. Heparin impact on outcome were analyzed regarding final TICI score, NIHSS at day one, modified rankin scale (mRS) and intracranial hemorrhagic transformation on imaging at day one.ResultsOver 1031 patients, 751 were included between January 2015 and June 2018 in 6 different centers, and 223 (26.69%) received heparin. Heparin administration was associated with a significant deleterious effect on NIHSS at 24h [adjusted OR = 1.2; p = 0.02], mRS at 3 months [adjusted OR 1.58; p = 0.03], and on complete reperfusion [TICI 3 adjusted OR 0.68; p = 0.02]. Heparin administration was associated with a significant reduction of hemorrhagic transformation [adjusted OR 0.48; p = 0.00005].ConclusionsHeparin administration during MT seems deleterious for reperfusion and functional outcome. Randomized trials are needed to identify the role of antithrombotic treatments, such as heparin, in the setting of acute ischemic stroke management.     

Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients Presenting with NIHSS Score <6: A Safety and Efficacy Analysis

Background and ObjectivesGroundbreaking trials have shown the tremendous efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusions. Currently, mechanical thrombectomy is limited to patients with NIHSS scores ≥6. We investigated the feasibility and safety of MT in patients presenting with NIHSS scores <6.Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of patient who presented with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion with an NIHSS score <6 between 2015 – 2021. The patients were then divided into two groups: those who received mechanical thrombectomy and those who did not.ResultsAmong 83 patients, 41 received a mechanical thrombectomy while 42 received medical treatment only. The mean age in the mechanical thrombectomy group was 66 years versus 60 years in the medical group (p = 0.06). Risk factors for stroke did not differ significantly between both groups. 14 patients (34.1%) in the mechanical thrombectomy group and 20 (47.6%) in the medical group received tissue plasminogen activator. No significant difference in clinical improvement (NIHSS) at discharge (p=0.85) or the mRS score at 90 days (p = 0.15) was noted. Mechanical thrombectomy was associated with smaller infarct size (p=0.04) and decreased mortality (p=0.03).ConclusionsMechanical thrombectomy is safe and effective for patients who present with large vessel occlusions and low initial NIHSS scores. Therefore, the decision to offer the patient mechanical thrombectomy or not should not be decided by NIHSS score alone. Rather, the decision should be multifactorial with the aim of maximizing the patients’ outcomes.     

Acute Ischemic Stroke Therapy in Infective Endocarditis: Case Series and Systematic Review

Objectives: To evaluate the safety of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) therapy in patients with infective endocarditis (IE) with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or endovascular therapy (EVT) such as mechanical thrombectomy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent AIS therapy with IVT or EVT at a tertiary referral center from 2013 to 2017, that were later diagnosed with acute IE as the causative mechanism. We then performed a systematic review of reports of acute ischemic reperfusion therapy in IE since 1995 for their success rates in terms of neurological outcome, and mortality, and their risk of hemorrhagic complication. Results: In the retrospective portion, 8 participants met criteria, of whom 4 received IVT and 4 received EVT. Through systematic review, 24 publications of 32 participants met criteria. Combined, a total of 40 participants were analyzed: 18 received IVT alone, 1 received combined IVT plus EVT, and 21 received EVT alone. IVT compared to EVT were similar in rates of good neurologic outcomes (58% versus 76%, P= .22) and mortality (21% versus 19%, P= .87), but had higher post-therapy intracranial hemorrhage (63% versus 18% [P= .006]). Conclusion: IV thrombolysis has a higher rate of post-therapy intracranial hemorrhage compared to EVT. EVT should be considered as first-line AIS therapy for patients with known, or suspected, IE who present with a large vessel occlusion.     

Number of Stent Retriever Passes Associated with Clinical Outcome After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between the number of stent retriever (SR) passes and clinical outcome after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke(AIS).MethodsWe retrospectively analyze data collected from consecutive patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) in anterior circulation treated with MT. Baseline characteristics, number of SR passes, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), clinical outcome measured by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days after MT were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between number of SR passes and patients’ clinical outcome.Results134 patients with LVO achieved successful reperfusion (mTICI 2B/3) were enrolled. Univariate analysis showed that patients with favorable outcomes were less likely to need more than three passes of SR (9.8%vs39.7%, p = 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, baseline NIHSS score (OR 0.922, 95%CI 0.859∼0.990, p = 0.025), more than three passes of SR (OR 0.284, 95%CI0.091∼0.882, p = 0.030) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR 0.116,95%CI0.021∼0.650, p = 0.014) each independently predicted poor outcome after MT at 90 days.ConclusionThe need for more than three passes of SR may be used as an independent predictor of poor outcome after MT in patients with acute ischemic stroke at 90 days.     

Patterns of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Stroke Before and After the 2015 Pivotal Trials and US National Guideline Update

BackgroundPositive pivotal trials followed by guideline endorsement can be a major driver of change in US national medical practice patterns. We therefore analyzed national trends in the use and outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion before and after the 2015 publication of pivotal trials and the US guideline update.MethodsWe analyzed the National Inpatient Sample from 2012-2016. Ischemic stroke and mechanical thrombectomy patients were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10. The primary efficacy outcome measure was discharge to home, which strongly correlates with mild degree of disability at discharge. Safety outcomes include in-hospital mortality and in-hospital medical complications.ResultsFrom 2012-2016, 2,394,550 discharges were recorded with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke, including 39,150 (1.6%) treated with mechanical thrombectomy. The number and proportion of stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy annually rose from 4,910/452,905 (1.1%) in 2012 to 11,860/509,215 (2.3%) in 2016. The largest annual increase occurred between 2014, when 6,460 stroke patients were treated with thrombectomy, and 2015, when 10,280 underwent thrombectomy. Comparing the pre (Q1 2012 - Q4 2014) and post (Q4 2015 – Q4 2016) RCT/Guideline epochs, in addition to increased thrombectomy rates, the proportion of thrombectomy patients who received IV-tPA decreased (46% to 24%, p<0.001). Rates of mild disability outcome increased from 16% to 20% (p<0.001), while mortality decreased from 15% to 13% (p=0.01). The odds of pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia decreased, while intracerebral hemorrhage, septicemia, deep venous thrombosis, shock, and cardiac arrest were unchanged.ConclusionIn the United States, thrombectomy treatment for acute ischemic stroke increased rapidly and substantially in frequency following publication of positive clinical trials and US guideline update in 2015, accompanied by improved functional outcomes and reduced peri-procedural mortality.     

Management of Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Related to Infective Endocarditis: Is Mechanical Thrombectomy a Safe Option?

IntroductionAcute ischemic stroke is the most common neurological complication of infective endocarditis. Intravenous thrombolysis is contraindicated in these patients due to a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications. Whether mechanical thrombectomy has some benefit in these patients remains unanswered although some favorable results can be found in literature.MethodsWe report twelve cases of acute ischemic stroke due to septic emboli treated with mechanical thrombectomy in two comprehensive stroke centers.ResultsMedian age was 63 years (IQR 58.8-77.5 years). Diagnosis of infective endocarditis was previous to the diagnosis of stroke in three of the patients. There were five cases of prosthetic-valve endocarditis and eight cases of native-valve endocarditis. Two patients were treated with intravenous thrombolysis with an extensive subarachnoid hemorrhage in 24 h follow-up CT in one of them. Another patient suffered an arterial perforation during the endovascular procedure without successful recanalization. 6 of the patients (50%) developed some type of hemorrhagic complications with three cases of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Early neurological recovery was achieved in 3 (25%) patients. Functional independence at 3 months in patients with successful revascularization was reached in 50% of the cases.ConclusionsIn patients with large vessel acute ischemic stroke related to infective endocarditis, mechanical thrombectomy might be considered with some potential benefit reported. There may be a high risk of hemorrhagic complications, as known for intravenous thrombolysis in this condition, suggesting that this procedure should be carefully evaluated in these patients.     

Intravenous alteplase for Chinese patients with stroke and borderline eligibility

Lack of efficacy and safety data among Chinese patients with stroke have contributed to the slow development of stroke thrombolysis as standard-of-care for these patients. We examined a retrospective cohort of 57 patients who received intravenous alteplase for acute ischemic stroke to identify predictors of outcome, including age, stroke severity, onset-to-treatment time, and early ischemic changes on brain CT scan. Overall, the mean National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 15.7 and the mean onset-to-treatment time was 142 minutes. Twenty-nine (51%) patients had a favorable outcome with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ?2 at three months. Ten (17.5%) patients were deceased at three months. Four (7%) patients developed symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). For patients aged >80 years (n = 18), five (28%) achieved favorable outcome, six (33%) were deceased at three months and three (17%) had sICH. Prognosis was worst for patients with NIHSS score >25 (n = 5); one (20%) was dependent (mRS 4) and the other four (80%) were deceased. Multivariate analysis found that the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was associated with favorable outcome (odds ratio [OR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–3.0), and mortality (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3–0.9). Our findings showed advanced age and severe stroke were associated with less favorable outcome in Chinese patients receiving intravenous alteplase, ASPECTS can be used reliably to identify patients at risk of poor outcomes. Further studies are warranted.     

Associations of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratios with Reperfusion and Functional Outcomes in Ischemic Stroke after Endovascular Therapy

ObjectivesTreatment of ischemic stroke with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) leads to improved outcomes compared to IV tPA. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a marker of inflammation, has been proposed to predict outcomes in ischemic stroke patients and may be used to identify patients at risk for poor outcomes after EVT.Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective study of adult ischemic stroke patients undergoing EVT between 1/1/2018 and 12/31/2020. Outcomes were successful reperfusion (TICI score ≥2B), favorable discharge NIHSS (≤4), favorable discharge and 3-month mRS (≤2), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). The primary exposure was NLR, measured pre- and post-EVT. Other variables collected included demographics and timing of stroke onset, arrival, groin puncture, tPA, and recanalization.ResultsA total of 592 patients were included. The most common vessel involved was the middle cerebral artery (73%). Lower admission NLR was associated with favorable discharge NIHSS and favorable discharge and 3-month mRS (all P < 0.01). NLRs measured after EVT were associated with all the primary outcomes. Improvements in NLR after EVT were associated with favorable discharge (P = 0.02) and 3-month mRS (P = 0.02) and lower incidence of sICH (P = 0.01).ConclusionsBecause of the long-term functional deficits that can persist after ischemic stroke, it is vital to identify patients with higher probability for these outcomes. The results from this study showed that favorable NLR measures, as well as favorable trends in NLR over time, are associated with improved outcomes, indicating that NLR is a useful marker to identify patients at risk for poor functional outcomes.     

Mechanical thrombectomy of M2 occlusions with distal access catheters using ADAPT

Background and purposeThe direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT) using distal access catheters (DAC) has proven to be an effective and safe endovascular treatment strategy of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusions (LVO). However, data about direct aspiration using DAC in M2 segment occlusions is limited.We assess the safety and efficacy of DACs in acute M2 occlusions using ADAPT with large bore (5 French /6 French) aspiration catheters as the primary method for endovascular recanalization.Materials and methodsFrom January 2017 to July 2018, 52 patients with an acute ischemic stroke due to M2 occlusions underwent mechanical thrombectomy using ADAPT with DACs (SOFIA 5 French/Catalyst 6) as frontline therapy. Patient demographics, technical parameters and outcome data were recorded.ResultsMedian National Institutes of Health Strokes Scale (NIHSS) Score was 12 at admission. Successful revascularization to mTICI 2b-3 with ADAPT alone was achieved in 45 of 52 patients (86.5%) with mTICI 3 achieved in 32 patients (61.5%). Additional stent retrievers were used in 6 patients and led to an overall successful revascularisation of 92.3% (48/52). Median NIHSS at discharge was 4. 29 of 52 (55.8%) patients had a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score 0–2 at three months. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not occur.ConclusionDACs can safely be used for mechanical thrombectomy of acute M2 occlusions by the ADAPT approach. Their use alone can be a high efficacious treatment of distal intracranial thromboembolic occlusions.     

Acute stroke care in a New York City comprehensive stroke center during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background and PurposeThe coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused unprecedented demand and burden on emergency health care services in New York City. We aim to describe our experience providing acute stroke care at a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) and the impact of the pandemic on the quality of care for patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from a quality improvement registry of consecutive AIS patients at New York University Langone Health's CSC between 06/01/2019-05/15/2020. During the early stages of the pandemic, the acute stroke process was modified to incorporate COVID-19 screening, testing, and other precautionary measures. We compared stroke quality metrics including treatment times and discharge outcomes of AIS patients during the pandemic (03/012020-05/152020) compared with a historical pre-pandemic group (6/1/2019-2/29/2020).ResultsA total of 754 patients (pandemic-120; pre-pandemic-634) were admitted with a principal diagnosis of AIS; 198 (26.3%) received alteplase and/or mechanical thrombectomy. Despite longer median door to head CT times (16 vs 12 minutes; p = 0.05) and a trend towards longer door to groin puncture times (79.5 vs. 71 min, p = 0.06), the time to alteplase administration (36 vs 35 min; p = 0.83), door to reperfusion times (103 vs 97 min, p = 0.18) and defect-free care (95.2% vs 94.7%; p = 0.84) were similar in the pandemic and pre-pandemic groups. Successful recanalization rates (TICI≥2b) were also similar (82.6% vs. 86.7%, p = 0.48). After adjusting for stroke severity, age and a prior history of transient ischemic attack/stroke, pandemic patients had increased discharge mortality (adjusted OR 2.90 95% CI 1.77 – 7.17, p = 0.021)ConclusionDespite unprecedented demands on emergency healthcare services, early multidisciplinary efforts to adapt the acute stroke treatment process resulted in keeping the stroke quality time metrics close to pre-pandemic levels. Future studies will be needed with a larger cohort comparing discharge and long-term outcomes between pre-pandemic and pandemic AIS patients.