单双相抑郁患者的情感气质特征及其与抗抑郁治疗反应的关系

目的探索单相抑郁、双相I型和双相II型抑郁患者情感气质特征的差异及其与抗抑郁治疗反应的关系。方法收集广州医科大学附属脑科医院和暨南大学第一附属医院的住院和门诊患者,包括332例单相抑郁患者、116例双相I型患者和152例双相II型患者,所有患者均处于重性抑郁发作期。在为期6周的半自然临床试验中,所有患者均接受抗抑郁药治疗,完成情感气质问卷中文版(TEMPS-A)和汉密尔顿抑郁量表17项版(HAMD-17)评定。比较治疗4、6周末不同气质类型为主导气质患者HAMD-17评分减分率。结果双相I型患者旺盛情感气质评分高于单相抑郁患者和双相II型患者[(9.91±4.53)分vs.(8.20±4.34)分vs.(8.53±4.14),F=6.562,P=0.002];而双相II型患者环性气质评分高于单相抑郁患者[(10.05±5.02)分vs.(7.47±5.22)分,F=12.89,P0.01]。治疗6周后,情感旺盛气质主导组HAMD-17评分减分率高于情感旺盛气质非主导组(F=6.44,P=0.011)。结论单双相抑郁患者的情感旺盛气质和环性气质的特征有所差异,旺盛情感气质可能可以作为处于重性抑郁发作期的情感障碍患者抗抑郁治疗反应的预测因子。     

Co-occurring manic symptomatology influences HPA axis alterations in depression

Although dysfunctioning of the HPA axis is considered to be a core pathophysiological process in mood disorders, the evidence with regard to depression remains conflicting. This could partly be due to the large heterogeneity within mood disorders, since HPA axis abnormalities may also be associated with the extent of co-occurring manic symptomatology as is seen in bipolar disorder. In this study, patients with depressive disorder and bipolar spectrum disorders were studied with regard to their HPA axis functioning. In 304 healthy controls, 1134 patients with pure unipolar depressive disorder (UP), and 133 bipolar spectrum disorder patients (BD spectrum), cortisol was measured in 7 saliva samples to determine the 1 h cortisol awakening response (CAR), evening cortisol levels and cortisol suppression after a 0.5 mg dexamethasone suppression test. Both patient groups had overall higher CAR levels compared to controls, but only UP patients showed a higher increase over time in the CAR. A linear association was found between increasing bipolarity and cortisol diurnal slope: BD spectrum patients had a significantly higher diurnal slope than UP patients. Dexamethasone suppression did not differ between mood disorder diagnoses. The heterogeneity in HPA axis functioning in patients with depression can partially be explained by co-existing manic symptomatology, since an increase in the CAR appears to be more specific for pure depression whereas the presence of bipolarity is associated with an increase in the diurnal slope of cortisol.     

The mood spectrum in unipolar and bipolar disorder: arguments for a unitary approach

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the extent to which individuals with a lifetime diagnosis of recurrent unipolar disorder endorse experiencing manic/hypomanic symptoms over their lifetimes and compared their reports with those of patients with bipolar I disorder. METHOD: The study group included 117 patients with remitted recurrent unipolar depression and 106 with bipolar I. Subjects had their clinical diagnosis confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview and were administered the Structured Clinical Interview for the Mood Spectrum, which assesses lifetime symptoms, traits, and lifestyles that characterize threshold and subthreshold mood episodes as well as "temperamental" features related to mood dysregulation. RESULTS: The patients with recurrent unipolar depression endorsed experiencing a substantial number of manic/hypomanic symptoms over their lifetimes. In both patients with recurrent unipolar depression and patients with bipolar I disorder, the number of manic/hypomanic items endorsed was related to the number of depressive items endorsed. In the group with recurrent unipolar depression, the number of manic/hypomanic items was related to an increased likelihood of endorsing paranoid and delusional thoughts and suicidal ideation. In the bipolar I group, the number of lifetime manic/hypomanic items was related to suicidal ideation and just one indicator of psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a significant number of manic/hypomanic items in patients with recurrent unipolar depression seems to challenge the traditional unipolar-bipolar dichotomy and bridge the gap between these two categories of mood disorders. The authors argue that their mood spectrum approach is useful in making a more accurate diagnostic evaluation in patients with mood disorders.     

Mood Disorders in Family Practice: Beyond Unipolarity to Bipolarity

Primary care physicians increasingly have treated depressive disorders over the last decade. Unrecognized bipolar disorder, sometimes misdiagnosed as unipolar depression, may lead to treatment resistance or nonresponse. We describe differences between unipolar and bipolar disorders, focusing on recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of bipolar spectrum disorders such as bipolar I, bipolar II, antidepressant-induced mania, and cyclothymia. Broadening the understanding of these different disorders and their presentation in primary care settings can enable earlier and more targeted treatment. Though 3 mood stabilizers are U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved for treatment of acute mania, no medications are currently approved for treating bipolar depression.     

The mood spectrum: improving the diagnosis of bipolar disorder

Although the distinction between bipolar and unipolar disorders served our field well in the early days of psychopharmacology, in clinical practice it is apparent that their phenotypes are only partially described by current diagnostic classification systems. A substantial body of evidence has accrued suggesting that clinical variability needs to be viewed in terms of a broad conceptualization of mood disorders and their common threshold or subthreshold comorbidity. The spectrum model provides a useful dimensional approach to psychopathology and is based on the assumption that early-onset and enduring symptoms shape the adult personality and establish a vulnerability to the subsequent development of Axis-I disorders. To obtain a clearer understanding of the depressive phenotype, it is pivotal that we increase our detection of hypomanic symptoms so that clinicians can better distinguish bipolar II disorder from unipolar depression. Diagnostic criteria sensitive to hypomanic symptoms have been identified that suggest bipolar II disorder is at least as prevalent as major depression. Moreover, the comorbidities of these illnesses are very different and alcoholism in particular appears to be a greater problem in bipolar II disorder than in unipolar depression. Structured clinical interviews and patient self-report questionnaires have also successfully identified the presence of hypomanic symptoms in patients with unipolar disorder and support the concept of a spectrum of bipolar illness. In conclusion, the importance of subthreshold syndromes should not be underestimated as failure to recognize bipolar spectrum disorder could delay treatment and worsen prognosis.     

DSM-IV depressive symptom expression among individuals with a history of hypomania: A comparison to those with or without a history of mania

In an effort to advance an understanding of the phenomenology of bipolar II depression, the current study used methods based in item response theory to evaluate differences in DSM-IV depression symptom endorsement in an epidemiological sample of individuals with a history of hypomania (i.e., bipolar II depression) in comparison to: a) individuals with a history of mania (i.e., bipolar I depression), and b) individuals without a history of hypomania or mania (i.e., unipolar depression). Clinical interview data were drawn from a subsample (n = 13,753) of individuals with bipolar II, bipolar I, or unipolar depression who had participated in the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. A two-parameter item response model was used to estimate differential item functioning (DIF) between these groups. Differences in severity parameter estimates revealed that suicidal ideation/attempt was less likely to be endorsed across most levels of depression severity in bipolar II versus bipolar I disorder. There were no significant differences between groups on the remaining DSM-IV symptoms. Although preliminary, current study data are consistent with recent assertions that depression may be understood as a clinical phenomenon that is consistent across the major affective disorders. An exception to this conclusion may be in the area of suicidal ideation, which requires additional attention.     

Implicit and explicit self-associations in bipolar disorder: A comparison with healthy controls and unipolar depressive disorder

According to cognitive theory, negative self-schemas are involved in the occurrence of depression. Whereas implicit depressive self-associations have been found in unipolar depression, it is unknown whether impaired associations with regard to the self are also involved in Bipolar Disorder (BD). This study investigated whether a bias in self-associations is a characteristic of bipolar disorder and whether discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-evaluations may be relevant for understanding bipolar psychopathology. Implicit and explicit self-associations were assessed in patients with BD (n=99), in patients with depressive disorder (n=1236), and healthy controls (n=387). Analyses of variance and correlation analyses were used to compare bipolar patients to controls and unipolar patients on implicit self-associations and the discrepancy between implicit and explicit self-associations. Similar to unipolar patients, patients with BD showed stronger implicit depressive self-associations than controls. Specifically for bipolar patients there was no significant correlation between implicit and explicit depressive self-associations. In a similar vein, discrepancies between implicit and explicit self-associations were relatively pronounced in symptomatic bipolar patients as compared to both healthy controls and unipolar depressed patients. Thus automatic depressive self-associations were characteristic for all mood disorders whereas a lack of concordance between implicit and explicit self-associations was specific for BD.     

Signaling networks in the pathophysiology and treatment of mood disorders

Over the past decade, the focus of research into the pathophysiology of mood disorders (bipolar disorder and unipolar depression in particular) has shifted from an interest in the biogenic amines to an emphasis on second messenger systems within cells. Second messenger systems rely on cell membrane receptors to relay information from the extracellular environment to the interior of the cell. Within the cell, this information is processed and altered, eventually to the point where gene and protein expression patterns are changed. There is a preponderance of evidence implicating second messenger systems and their primary contact with the extracellular environment, G proteins, in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. After an introduction to G proteins and second messenger pathways, this review focuses on the evidence implicating G proteins and two second messenger systems-the adenylate cyclase (cyclic adenosine monophosphate, cAMP) and phosphoinositide (protein kinase C, PKC) intracellular signaling cascades-in the pathophysiology and treatment of bipolar disorder and unipolar depression. Emerging evidence implicates changes in cellular resiliency, neuroplasticity and additional cellular pathways in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. The systems discussed within this review have been implicated in neuroplastic processes and in modulation of many other cellular pathways, making them likely candidates for mediators of these findings.     

Higher risk of developing major depression and bipolar disorder in later life among adolescents with asthma: A nationwide prospective study

ObjectivePrevious studies have suggested an immunological dysfunction in mood disorders, but rarely have investigated the temporal association between allergic diseases and mood disorders. Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, we attempted to investigate the association between asthma in early adolescence and the risk of unipolar depression and bipolar disorder in later life.MethodsIn all, 1453 adolescents with asthma aged between 10 and 15 years and 5812 age-/gender-matched controls were selected in 1998–2000. Subjects with unipolar depression and bipolar disorder that occurred up to the end of follow-up (December 31 2010) were identified.ResultsAdolescents with asthma had a higher incidence of major depression (2.8% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001), any depressive disorder (6.1% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.001), and bipolar disorder (1.0% vs. 0.3%, p < 0.001) than the control group. Cox regression analysis showed that asthma in early adolescence was associated with an increased risk of developing major depression (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14–2.89), any depressive disorder (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.27–2.37), and bipolar disorder (HR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.01–5.07), after adjusting for demographic data and comorbid allergic diseases.DiscussionAdolescents with asthma had an elevated risk of developing mood disorders in later life. Further studies would be required to investigate the underlying mechanisms for this comorbid association and elucidate whether prompt intervention for asthma would decrease the risk of developing mood disorders.     

An overview of the genetics of psychotic mood disorders

This article presents a conceptual review of the genetic underpinnings of psychotic mood disorders. Both unipolar and bipolar forms of mood disorder sometimes feature psychotic symptoms. Some evidence from epidemiological research suggests that psychotic forms of mood disorder specifically might be heritable. Linkage studies of mood disorders in general have also provided some support for that notion, as have associated studies involving serotonin and dopamine genes and psychotic mood disorder. Some research suggests there might be a genetic connection between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, undermining the Kraepelinian dichotomous classification of the psychoses. Future research should continue to examine psychotic forms of mood disorder using both epidemiological and molecular approaches.     

Volumetric MRI studies of mood disorders: do they distinguish unipolar and bipolar disorder?

The authors reviewed magnetic resonance imaging volumetric imaging results in major mood disorders, particularly comparing similarities and differences from studies of bipolar disorder and unipolar major depression. Abnormalities of cerebral brain regions appear inconsistently in mood disorders and, when present, typically consist of decreased frontal or prefrontal cortical volumes in both unipolar depression and bipolar disorder. In contrast, subcortical and medial temporal abnormalities are more commonly observed and are different between these two major classes of affective illness. Specifically, whereas structural enlargement of the basal ganglia and amygdala have been observed in bipolar disorder, in unipolar depression, these structures appear to be smaller in patients than healthy subjects. These findings suggest that affective illnesses may share in common an underdeveloped or atrophied prefrontal region, leading to loss of cortical modulation of limbic emotional networks. The effect of this loss results in unipolar depression or cycling (mania with depression) depending on the abnormalities of the subcortical structures involved. The cerebellum may also play a role in the presentation of mood disorders. This hypothesis remains speculative as much more research is needed to specifically examine how morphometric brain abnormalities translate into the neurophysiologic deficits that produce mood disorders.     

Highly recurrent unipolar may be related to bipolar II

Unipolar and bipolar disorders may be subgroups of a single mood disorder, of which the key feature is not polarity, but the episodic, recurrent course. The aim of this study was to determine whether highly recurrent unipolar was related to bipolar II, by comparing clinical and family history features. Eighty-nine consecutive unipolar and 151 consecutive bipolar II outpatients, presenting for major depressive episode (MDE) treatment, were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) and the Family History Screen. Unipolar patients were divided into highly recurrent (>4 MDEs) (HRUP) and low recurrent (相似文献   

Bipolar disorders and suicidal behaviour

Rihmer Z, Kiss K. Bipolar disorders and suicidal behaviour. Bipolar Disord 2002: 4(Suppl. 1): 21–25. © Blackwell Munksgaard, 2002
Major depressive disorder is the leading cause of suicide, particularly in the absence of adequate treatment. The aim of this paper is to analyse the relationship between different forms of major mood disorders and suicidal behaviour. Population-based epidemiological surveys as well as clinical studies on the clinically explorable suicide risk factors in bipolar and unipolar depressive disorders are reviewed. The present literature shows that patients with bipolar disorders are at higher risk of attempted and completed suicide than that of patients with unipolar major depression. Contrasting only bipolar I and bipolar II patients, current findings indicate that the rate of prior suicide attempt is higher in bipolar II patients, and bipolar II disorder is overrepresented in depressed suicide victims. Among patients with different clinical manifestations of major mood disorders (unipolar major depression, bipolar I and bipolar II disorder), bipolar patients in general, and bipolar II subjects in particular carry the highest risk of suicide.     

单相抑郁与双相障碍住院患者地塞米松抑制试验的对照研究

目的 通过地塞米松抑制试验(DST)了解单相抑郁和双相障碍患者在不同情绪状态下的下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴功能改变情况. 方法对38例单相抑郁住院患者和63例双相障碍住院患者(双相障碍Ⅰ型19例,双相障碍Ⅱ型44例;双相障碍抑郁发作者33例,双相障碍躁狂发作者18例,双相障碍混合发作者12例)进行DST,其中17例单相抑郁、35例双相障碍患者在治疗4周后再次行DST,比较各组DST脱抑制率差异.结果 治疗前,单相抑郁的DST脱抑制率(36.8%)与双相障碍(14.3%)、双相障碍Ⅰ型(10.5%)、双相障碍Ⅱ型(15.9%)以及双相障碍抑郁发作(15.2%)之间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);双相障碍Ⅰ型(10.5%)与双相障碍Ⅱ型(15.9%)之间,双相障碍抑郁发作(15.2%)、双相障碍混合发作(16.7%)和双相障碍躁狂发作(11.1%)两两比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗后,DST脱抑制率在上述各组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗后单相抑郁的DST脱抑制率随着病情改善而降低,但较治疗前差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),双相障碍的DST脱抑制率在治疗前后比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论在疾病期,单相抑郁的DST脱抑制率高于双相障碍;双相障碍的DST脱抑制率与临床分型、发作类型、病情无关.     

Agitated Depression: Unipolar? Bipolar? or Both?

The classification of agitated depression (major depressive episode (MDE) plus psychomotor agitation) in mood disorders is unclear. DSM-IV is neutral on this point. As antidepressants may increase agitation, a better understanding of agitated depression is important for clinical practice. Study aim was to find if agitated depression was closer to bipolar or to unipolar disorders, by studying its association with variables typically related to bipolar disorders (early onset, many recurrences, more atypical features, more bipolar family history), and by studying its association with bipolar II disorder. Consecutive 151 unipolar and 226 bipolar II psychoactive drug-free MDE outpatients were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, when presenting for MDE treatment. Agitated MDE patients were compared with nonagitated MDE patients. Statistics were t test for means, two-sample test of proportion, and logistic regression (STATA 7). Agitated MDE was present in 85 patients (22.5%). It had significantly more bipolar II disorder patients (80.0% vs. 54.1%, p = 0.0000), more females, lower age at onset, longer duration of illness, more MDE recurrences, more atypical features, more MDE symptoms, and more family history of bipolar disorders, than nonagitated MDE. To control for the possible confounding effect of bipolar II disorder, logistic regression was used. All the significant differences became nonsignificant. Results might suggest that agitated MDE might be closer to the bipolar spectrum than to unipolar disorder, because it was associated with variables typically distinguishing bipolar from unipolar disorders, and with bipolar II disorder. Further studies on this topic are needed.     

Sleep-wake cycle and melatonin rhythms in adolescents and young adults with mood disorders: Comparison of unipolar and bipolar phenotypes

This study evaluated the potential of circadian measures as early markers of mood disorders subtypes. Patients with bipolar disorders had significantly lower levels and later onset of melatonin secretion than those with unipolar depression. Furthermore, abnormal phase angles between sleep, melatonin and temperature were found in several patients.     

单相抑郁与双相抑郁差异的研究进展

抑郁症因其病因不清、致病因素复杂、发病机制不清,一直以来都是精神科领域聚焦研究的热点和难点。单相抑郁与双相抑郁均以情绪低落、兴趣减少或愉快感丧失、精力不济或疲劳等为临床特征。由于二者表现的相似性,给临床诊断带来很大的困扰。现综述单、双相抑郁在临床特点、生化代谢、脑功能影像、面部表情识别与认知功能等方面的差异,为临床鉴别两者提供理论依据,以期提高临床用药的准确性与安全性。     

Differences between unipolar and bipolar I depression in the quantitative analysis of glutamic acid decarboxylase-immunoreactive neuropil

Alterations in GABAergic neurotransmission are assumed to play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) is the key enzyme in GABA synthesis. This study aimed to differentiate between unipolar and bipolar I depression using quantitative evaluation of GAD-immunoreactive (GAD-ir) neuropil in several brain regions known to be involved in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Immunohistochemical staining of GAD 65/67 was performed in the orbitofrontal, anterior cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), the entorhinal cortex, the hippocampal formation and the medial dorsal and lateral dorsal (LD) thalamic nuclei, with a quantitative densitometric analysis of GAD-ir neuropil. The study was performed on paraffin-embedded brains from 9 unipolar and 12 bipolar I depressed patients (8 and 6 suicidal patients, respectively) and 18 matched controls. In unipolar patients, compared with controls, only the increased relative density of GAD-ir neuropil in the right LD was different from the previous results in depressed suicides from the same cohort (Gos et al. in J Affect Disord 113:45–55, 2009). On the other hand, the left DLPFC was the only area where a significant decrease was observed, specific for bipolar I depression. Significant differences between both diagnostic groups were found in these regions. By revealing abnormalities in the relative density of GAD-ir neuropil in brain structures, our study suggests a diathesis of the GABAergic system in mood disorders, which may differentiate the pathophysiology of unipolar from that of bipolar I depression.     

Affective Temperaments in Alcohol and Opiate Addictions

Temperament is considered as a biological disposition reflected by relatively stable features related to mood and reactivity to external and internal stimuli, including variability in emotional reactions. The aim of the present study is to test the hypothesis that affective temperaments might differ according to co-occurring mood disorders among patients with alcohol and/or opiate dependence; to explore the relationship between temperaments and dual substance use disorders (SUDs, alcohol and other drugs). Ninety-two patients attending an alcohol addiction treatment facility and 47 patients in an opiate addiction treatment facility were assessed for SUDs, mood disorders and affective temperaments using the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego 39-item auto-questionnaire. Comparison of patients with bipolar disorder, depressive unipolar disorder and no (or substance-induced) mood disorder revealed significant differences for the cyclothymic subscale, with highest scores among patients with bipolar disorder. No difference was observed for the depressive, irritable, hyperthymic and anxious subscales. After adjustment for age, gender and bipolar disorder, irritable temperament was a significant risk factor for past or present history of drug use disorders in patients treated for alcohol addiction (odds ratio [OR] 1.42, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.93). Anxious temperament was a significant risk factor for history of alcohol use disorders in patients treated for opiate addiction (OR 3.30, 95 % CI 1.36–7.99), whereas the hyperthymic subscale appeared as a significant protective factor (OR 0.65, 95 % CI 0.42–0.99). The results highlight the need to consider temperamental aspects in further research to improve the long-term outcome of patient with addictive disorders, who often present complex comorbidity patterns.