Hydroxyethyl starch versus albumin in cardiopulmonary bypass prime solutions

To compare hydroxyethyl starch (HES) with 25% albumin, 20 patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass were randomized into two groups: 10 received 1,000 ml of HES and 10 received 200 ml of 25% albumin in a bloodless priming solution for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Platelet aggregation, antithrombin III, reptilase time, fibrinogen, plasminogen, fluid requirements, and hemodynamics were monitored. Platelet aggregation was abnormal in both groups, being relatively poorer in the albumin group. Both groups exhibited below normal antithrombin III and plasminogen levels, with significantly lower antithrombin III levels noted in the HES group postoperatively (41.9 +/- 11.8% versus 56.6 +/- 9.9%; p = 0.006). Compared with the albumin group, the HES group had slightly, but not significantly, elevated liver function test results, total volume replacement (9,173 +/- 2,046 ml versus 8,522 +/- 1,192 ml; p = 0.057), packed red blood cell usage (227 +/- 284 ml versus 75 +/- 168 ml; p = 0.066), and chest tube drainage (599 +/- 253 ml versus 454 +/- 174 ml; p = 0.144). In the HES group, 5% albumin requirement was greater (386 +/- 466 ml versus 50 +/- 158 ml; p = 0.002) and percent increase of body weight was higher (5.2 +/- 0.8% versus 2.3 +/- 0.6%; p = 0.05) postoperatively. Postoperative weight increase and colloid requirements plus trends toward larger blood loss and blood transfusions indicate possible further evaluation. However, results suggest that HES is a safe additive to priming solutions. Compared with albumin, HES has comparable changes in coagulation variables and slightly less severe derangements in platelet aggregation.     

Hydroxyethyl starch as a prime for cardiopulmonary bypass: effects of two different solutions on haemostasis

Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) is efficacious as a volume expander in cardiac surgical patients, but it may impair the haemostatic mechanisms. However, this latter effect may be less conspicuous with low molecular weight (LMW) solutions than with high molecular weight (HMW) solutions. Therefore, LMW– and HMW–HES solutions were evaluated as priming solutions for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with respect to their effect on haemostasis. Forty–five patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting were prospectively randomised to three groups and in a double–blind manner as their CPB prime either 20 ml kg^-1 LMW–HES (M_w 120 000), 20 ml kg^-1 HMW–HES (M_w 400000) or Ringer's acetate 2000 ml. The final volume of the prime was completed to 2000 ml with Ringer's acetate in the HES groups. Anaesthesia and CPB management were standardised. Plasma levels of von Willebrand factor antigen and factor VIII procoagulant activity were significantly more depressed after CPB in both HES–groups as compared with the crystalloid prime group. In addition, APTT was more prolonged and the maximal amplitude of thromboelastographic tracing was more decreased in the HES–groups. It is concluded that it may be advisable to avoid HES solutions in the CPB prime, especially in patients with an increased risk for bleeding after cardiac operations.     

Hydroxyethyl starch in priming fluid for cardiopulmonary bypass

The physiochemical characteristics of hydroxyethyl starch make it suitable for use as a colloidal blood plasma substitute. In high doses, this drug may interfere with blood coagulation. Because of its effectiveness and low cost, we have used hydroxyethyl starch rather than albumin in the priming fluid for cardiopulmonary bypass: 500 ml of 6% hydroxyethyl starch and 2,000 ml of lactated Ringer's solution. To determine if excessive bleeding has been associated with the use of hydroxyethyl starch, we reviewed 760 cardiac operations. The patients were 49.9 +/- 0.5 years old (mean +/- SEM) and weighed 73 +/- 1 kg. Blood loss during the first postoperative day was 578 +/- 25 ml, and 4.0 +/- 0.2 units of bank blood were utilized in the perioperative period. We have used an improved method of administering heparin and protamine for the past 3 years. In the 461 patients operated upon since then, blood loss was 437 +/- 21 ml, 2.9 +/- 0.1 units of bank blood were used, and excessive postoperative bleeding necessitated re-exploration in nine patients (2.0%). These results compare favorably with other recently published series in which hydroxyethyl starch was not used in the pump prime. Thus the dose of hydroxyethyl starch in our priming fluid does not appear to be associated with excessive bleeding. In view of its safety and low cost, hydroxyethyl starch is a suitable colloidal blood plasma substitute for use during cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Hydroxyethyl starch as a priming solution for cardiopulmonary bypass impairs hemostasis after cardiac surgery

We investigated the influence of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) as a priming solution for the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit on postoperative hemostasis in 45 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. In a randomized sequence, 20 mL/kg of low-molecular-weight HES (HES 120; molecular weight 120,000 daltons), high-molecular-weight HES (HES 400; molecular weight 400,000 daltons), or 4% human albumin (ALB) was used as the main component of the CPB priming solution. The thromboelastographic values indicating the speed of solid clot formation (alpha-angle) and the strength of the fibrin clot (maximum amplitude and shear elastic modulus) were decreased up to 2 h after CPB in both HES groups. Four hours after the operation, blood loss through the chest tubes had increased in the HES groups: HES 120, mean 804 mL (range, 330-1390 mL); HES 400, mean 1008 mL (range, 505-1955 mL); and ALB, mean 681 mL (range, 295-1500 mL) (P < 0.05 between the HES 400 and ALB groups). We conclude that HES solutions, when given in doses of 20 mL/kg in connection with the CPB prime, compromise hemostasis after cardiac surgery. This effect appears related to formation of a less stable thrombus compared with that formed in the presence of ALB. IMPLICATIONS: The influence of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) on postoperative hemostasis was investigated in cardiac surgery. The thromboelastographic values indicated that HES solutions, when given in connection with the cardiopulmonary bypass prime, compromise hemostasis after cardiac surgery. This effect seems to occur through the formation of a less stable clot.     

Hydroxyethyl starch versus albumin for colloid infusion following cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization

Hydroxyethyl starch or hetastarch (HES), a synthetic colloid for intravascular volume expansion, was compared with albumin after coronary artery operations in 30 patients (15 in each study group). Cardiac index, atrial pressures, heart rate, and systolic blood pressure were similar in both groups. There were no differences in cumulative urine output at 24 hours or in weight change during the first 7 postoperative days. Values for colloid osmotic pressure, as well as for this variable minus left atrial pressure, were lowest soon after bypass but returned to baseline within 4 hours, with no difference between groups in the first 24 hours or 7 days after operation. Coagulation variables were similar, but prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times were higher 12 hours postoperatively and fibrinogen level was lower 7 days postoperatively in the patients receiving HES. There was no clinical evidence of excessive bleeding, although cumulative chest drainage at 12 and 24 hours was slightly higher in the HES group (p = 0.09 and 0.08, respectively). We conclude that hetastarch is a safe and effective colloid to use following coronary operations.     

Hetastarch as a prime for cardiopulmonary bypass

Hetastarch, a synthetic colloid osmotic plasma volume expander, was employed in a prime for cardiopulmonary bypass in 37 patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. Comparison of laboratory values to those of 42 patients undergoing myocardial revascularization using an albumin-containing prime showed lower postoperative platelet counts (p less than 0.02) with hetastarch. There were no differences in chest tube drainage, blood use, plasma hemoglobin, fibrinogen levels, of coagulation times. The hetastarch prime cost $119.50 per patient, whereas the albumin-containing prime cost $321.35 per patient.     

Comparison of Ringer's acetate and lactate solutions as a prime for cardiopulmonary bypass

Nineteen patients undergoing myocardial revascularization were randomly given either Ringer's lactate or acetate solution as the prime of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was determined before, and for 10 minutes after, the commencement of CPB. There were no significant differences in SVR or perfusion pressure between the acetate or lactate groups before or during CPB. Blood gas and acid-base values, haematocrit, serum potassium, sodium and ionized calcium concentrations as well as patient temperature were similar in the two study groups. Our results are at variance with some previous experimental findings, which have suggested that acetate has a greater vasodilative effect than lactate.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting supported with intracardiac microaxial pumps versus normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the difference in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) performed with normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and CABG supported with the intracardiac microaxial pump (ICP, Impella, Aachen, Germany). METHODS: A prospective randomized study was conducted in seven centers. The study population consists of 199 patients undergoing isolated primary CABG (CPB group 94 patients, ICP group 105 patients). Both groups are equal in demographic variables, number of bypasses performed, and Euroscore predicted mortality. We analyzed clinical outcome, myocardial enzymes and blood parameters of hemolysis, organ function and inflammatory response. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (16%), randomized in the ICP group, were switched to the CPB group. This was due to the inability to position the right side catheter adequately (n=8), to a pump failure (n=1) or to the perioperative decision that beating heart surgery is technically not possible (n=8). There was no significant difference between the two study arms regarding the pump assistance time (CPB 67.1+/-22.9 min; ICP 67.7+/-30.3 min; P=0.88861), the number of grafts (CPB 2.4+/-0.7; ICP 2.3+/-0.8) and the number of grafts to the back wall (CFX; both groups n=37). There is no significant difference in clinical outcome, evolution of myocardial enzymes, indices of organ function and hemolysis. There is a reduced inflammatory response in the ICP group as indicated in the postoperative release of granulocyte elastase (CPB 259+/-195; ICP 150+/-126 microg/l; P<0.00001) and complement C3 (CPB 0.73+/-0.2; ICP 0.65+/-0.2g/l; P=0.008). CONCLUSION: The intracardiac pump for the right heart is difficult to introduce. As a consequence the right side pump underwent design modifications. There were no differences in clinical outcome between both groups. The inflammatory response is significantly reduced in the ICP group.     

Pentastarch versus albumin in cardiopulmonary bypass prime: impact on blood loss

Background: Albumin is commonly used as a volume expander in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) prime. Pentastarch, a low molecular weight hetastarch, may provide similar efficacy at decreased cost but is known to alter coagulation profiles. Infectious concerns forced the temporary withdrawal of albumin in our institution. Therefore we evaluated pentastarch as an alternative with regards to perioperative hemostasis and blood loss. Methods: One hundred consecutive adult patients undergoing first-time aorto-coronary bypass were given 750 mL of 10% pentastarch (represented as P in calculations) diluted in 1000 mL of Ringer's solution added in their CPB prime. A similar control group of 100 consecutive patients had received 200 mL of 25% albumin (represented as A in calculations) diluted in 1500 mL of Ringer's solution. Results: Postoperative prothrombin time (PT) was slightly higher with pentastarch (P: 14.9 ± 1.5 seconds, A: 14.2 ± 1.3 seconds, p = 0.003). Postoperative bleeding was also increased (P: 2337 ± 1242 mL, A: 1981 ± 1121 mL, p = 0.0341, mostly because of recirculated shed mediastinal blood (P: 834 ± 499 mL, A: 640 ± 388, p = 0.002) rather than lost pleural tube blood (P: 1503 ± 821 mL, A: 1341 ± 824 mL, p = 0.16). Overall net blood loss (P: 2014 ± 914 mL, A: 2061 ± 1015, p = 0.73) was similar. Blood-product transfusion requirements and postoperative daily hematocrits did not differ. Conclusion: The diminished coagulability associated with this dose of pentastarch resulted in increased postoperative bleeding. However, with recirculation of shed mediastinal blood, there was no net increase in blood loss. In this setting, pentastarch may serve as a suitable alternative to albumin.     

Aortic valve replacement with the minimal extracorporeal circulation (Jostra MECC System) versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized prospective trial

BACKGROUND: We prospectively evaluated a newly introduced minimal extracorporeal circulation system (Jostra MECC System; Jostra AG, Hirrlingen, Germany) for aortic valve surgery. METHOD: In a prospective, randomized study, 100 patients underwent aortic valve replacement either with standard cardiopulmonary bypass (n = 50, group B) or with the MECC System (n = 50, group B). The myocardial protection and the left vent were identical for the two groups. The intrapericardial suction device was never used (only the cell salvage device was used) to reduce the air-blood contact area. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in patient characteristics and operative data between groups. Operative mortality (<30 days) was 2% for group A and 4% for group B (difference not significant). From the preoperative period to the postoperative period, the increase in C-reactive protein was significantly higher for group B (P <.001). The postoperative troponin I level was significantly lower in group A (mean 4.65 +/- 2.9 microg/L at 24 hours) than in group B (8.2 +/- 4.4 microg/L, P <.03). On the other hand, the MECC System was associated with platelet preservation. Renal function was better preserved and the neurologic event rate was significantly lower for the MECC group (P <.02). CONCLUSION: The MECC System is safe and allows aortic valve replacement under the most favorable conditions. The system is more biocompatible than standard cardiopulmonary bypass and provides a good postoperative biologic profile and good clinical results, particularly for high-risk patients.     

Vein versus polytetrafluoroethylene in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Controversy still exists whether polytetrafluoroethylene is equivalent to vein as bypass graft material for the above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. Therefore, a prospective randomized trial was performed to compare vein with polytetrafluoroethylene for femoropopliteal bypasses with the distal anastomosis above the knee. METHODS: Between January 1993 and December 1996, 151 above-knee femoropopliteal bypasses were performed. The indications for operation were severe claudication in 120 cases, rest pain in 20 cases, and ulceration in 11 cases. After randomization, 75 reversed saphenous venous bypasses and 76 polytetrafluoroethylene bypasses were performed. RESULTS: No perioperative mortality was seen, and 5% of the patients had minor infections of the wound, not resulting in loss of the bypass, the limb, or life. After 5 years, 38% of the patients had died and 7% were lost to follow-up. Only once was the saphenous vein necessary for coronary artery bypass grafting. Primary patency rates after 5 years were 75.6% for venous bypass grafts and 51.9% for polytetrafluoroethylene grafts (P =.035). Secondary patency rates were 79.7% for vein and 57.2% for polytetrafluoroethylene bypasses (P =.036). In the venous group, 14 bypasses failed, leading to five new bypasses. In the polytetrafluoroethylene group, 29 bypasses failed, leading to 16 reinterventions. For these 16 new bypasses, in four cases, the ipsilateral preserved saphenous vein was used. In both groups, one above-knee amputation and one below-knee amputation had to be performed. CONCLUSION: We conclude after 5 years of follow-up of this randomized controlled trial that a bypass with saphenous vein has better patency rates at all intervals and needs fewer reoperations. Saphenous vein should be the graft material of choice for above-knee femoropopliteal bypasses and should not be preserved for reinterventions. Polytetrafluoroethylene is an acceptable alternative if the saphenous vein is not available.     

Albumin versus hydroxyethyl starch in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of postoperative bleeding

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis tested the hypothesis that cumulative blood loss during the first 24 hours after cardiopulmonary bypass is lower in patients exposed to albumin than hydroxyethyl starch (HES). METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing albumin and HES in cardiopulmonary bypass patients were identified by bibliographic database searches and other methods. RESULTS: Sixteen trials involving 653 randomized patients were included. In 88% of randomized comparisons, postoperative bleeding was lower in the albumin group, and the standardized mean difference in bleeding favoring albumin across all trials (-0.24; 95% confidence interval, -0.40 to -0.08) was statistically significant. Bleeding differences between albumin and either high or medium molecular weight HES were similar. In trials of adults, the pooled mean blood loss in the albumin group was 693+/-350 mL compared with 789+/-487 mL in the HES group. The estimated proportion of adult albumin group patients with blood loss of more than 1,000 mL was 19% compared with 33% of adult HES group patients. Conclusions. Postoperative blood loss is significantly lower in cardiopulmonary bypass patients exposed to albumin than HES.