Progenitor cell recruitment during individualized high-flow, very-large-volume apheresis for autologous transplantation improves collection efficiency

BACKGROUND: Individual adaptation of processed patient's blood volume (PBV) should reduce number and/or duration of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The durations of leukapheresis procedures were adapted by means of an interim analysis of harvested CD34+ cells to obtain the intended yield of CD34+ within as few and/or short as possible leukapheresis procedures. Absolute efficiency (AE; CD34+/kg body weight) and relative efficiency (RE; total CD34+ yield of single apheresis/total number of preapheresis CD34+) were calculated, assuming an intraapheresis recruitment if RE was greater than 1, and a yield prediction models for adults was generated. RESULTS: A total of 196 adults required a total of 266 PBPC collections. The median AE was 7.99 x 10(6), and the median RE was 1.76. The prediction model for AE showed a satisfactory predictive value for preapheresis CD34+ only. The prediction model for RE also showed a low predictive value (R2 = 0.36). Twenty-eight children underwent 44 PBPC collections. The median AE was 12.13 x 10(6), and the median RE was 1.62. Major complications comprised bleeding episodes related to central venous catheters (n = 4) and severe thrombocytopenia of less than 10 x 10(9) per L (n = 16). CONCLUSION: A CD34+ interim analysis is a suitable tool for individual adaptation of the duration of leukapheresis. During leukapheresis, a substantial recruitment of CD34+ was observed, resulting in a RE of greater than 1 in more than 75 percent of patients. The upper limit of processed PBV showing an intraapheresis CD34+ recruitment is higher than in a standard large-volume leukapheresis. Therefore, a reduction of individually needed PBPC collections by means of a further escalation of the processed PBV seems possible.     

Leukapheresis after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: a novel approach to harvest a second autograft

BACKGROUND: Autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are usually collected after the administration of conventional-dose chemotherapy (CDCT) and growth factors. However, there are no data available concerning the collection of PBPCs after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and autologous hematopoietic transplantation in a larger series. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients (n = 30) underwent leukapheresis for PBPC harvest after CDCT. After HDCT and autografting, the collection of a second PBPC autograft was attempted. RESULTS: Leukapheresis was performed after CDCT in all cases at a median of 118 CD34+ cells per microL (range, 18-589) and resulted in 6.4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (range, 1.7-29.0). After HDCT and autografting, 24 patients (80%) underwent secondary leukapheresis, although they had a significantly lower median of peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cells (30/microL; range, 10-171; p < 0.001). In these patients a median of 3.6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (range, 1.6-10.1) was collected in the post-transplantation course. In the remaining six patients (20%) with PB CD34+ cells < 10 per microL, no PBPC harvesting was performed. These so-called poor mobilizers had received significantly less CD34+ cells for autologous transplantation than patients with successful post-HDCT mobilization (median, 2.5 x 10(6)/kg [range, 1.7-3.0] vs. 6.5 x 10(6)/kg [range, 3.2-19.6]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Collection of PBPCs is possible in most patients during the recovery phase of hematopoiesis after HDCT plus autografting, and the number of circulating PBPCs may be related to the CD34+ cell dose transfused by the preceding autograft.     

CD34+ cell dose requirements for rapid engraftment in a sequential high-dose chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) with PBPC support in metastatic breast cancer

Sequential high-dose chemotherapy may increase the threshold dose of CD34+ cells necessary for rapid and successful hematologic recovery. There are limited data regarding the pharmacodynamics and threshold CD34+ cell dose required for engraftment following high-dose paclitaxel. To determine the dose of CD34+ PBPC sufficient for rapid engraftment, 65 women with metastatic breast cancer undergoing a sequential high-dose paclitaxel, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) chemotherapy regimen were evaluated. The intertreatment interval was a median of 27 days. Paclitaxel was escalated from 400 to 825 mg/m2, infused continuously (CI) over 24 h on day -4 with PBPC reinfusion on day 0. Following marrow recovery, 90 mg/m2/day of melphalan was given over 30 min on days -2 and -1, with PBPC reinfusion on day 0. On recovery, patients received CTCb on days -7 to -3, with PBPC reinfusion on day 0. G-CSF was administered after each cycle until WBCC recovery. For paclitaxel, an ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/L occurred at a median of 6 days (range 0-7 days) after PBPC reinfusion. The median nadir platelet count was 63 x 10(9)/L (range 6 x 10(9)/L-176 x 10(9)/L). Eight patients (12%) had platelet nadir <20 x 10(9)/L, and all recovered their counts to >20 x 10(9)/L on day 7. There was no clinical difference in days to engraftment between women receiving <2 or > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ PBPC/kg following paclitaxel. All patients recovered neutrophil and platelet counts within 7 days after reinfusion of > or =1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg and G-CSF. The data suggest that a paclitaxel dose of 825 mg/m2 is not myeloablative. For melphalan, median days to ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/L was 10 days (range 9-15), and platelet recovery to >20 x 10(9)/L was 13 days (range 0-28) after PBPC reinfusion. Median time to engraftment was more rapid in patients receiving > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+/kg versus <2 x 10(6)CD34+/kg, for both neutrophils (11 days versus 10 days, p = 0.05) and platelets (14 days versus 12 days, p < 0.01). Ninety-eight percent of patients infused with > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+/kg engrafted within 21 days. Following CTCb in this sequential regimen, a dose of > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg provided for significantly more rapid neutrophil engraftment than <2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (9 days versus 10 days,p = 0.01), but a dose > or =3 X 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg is necessary for reliable, rapid, and sustained neutrophil and platelet engraftment by day 21.     

A prospective, randomized, sequential, crossover trial of large-volume versus normal-volume leukapheresis procedures: effect on progenitor cells and engraftment

BACKGROUND: The influence of leukapheresis size on the number of harvested peripheral blood progenitor cells is still unclear. A prospective randomized crossover trial was thus performed, to evaluate the effect of large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) versus normal-volume leukapheresis (NVL) on progenitor cells and engraftment in 26 patients with breast cancer and 15 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who were eligible for peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either LVL on Day 1 and on Day 2 or vice versa. The number of progenitor cells was evaluated in the harvest and before and after leukapheresis in the peripheral blood. RESULTS: The number of harvested CD34+ cells (4.8 x 10(6) vs. 3.4 x 10(6)/kg body weight, p < 0.001) and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (3.1 x 10(5) vs. 2.4 x 10(5)/kg body weight, p = 0.0026) was significantly higher for LVL procedures than for NVL procedures. The median extraction efficacy, defined as the difference between the yield in the harvest and the decrease in the total number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood during leukapheresis, was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher for LVL than for NVL (2.6 x 10(8) and 8 x 10(7), respectively). In patients with breast cancer, the median amount of CD34+ cells in the harvest and the median extraction efficacy were higher for LVL than for NVL (p < 0.0001). This was not found for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. CONCLUSION: LVL results in a higher yield of CD34+ cells and colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage than NVL, but only in patients with breast cancer and with high numbers of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood before leukapheresis.     

Large-volume leukapheresis using femoral venous access for harvesting peripheral blood stem cells with the Fenwal CS 3000 Plus from normal healthy donors: predictors of CD34+ cell yield and collection efficiency

The current paper reports on the predicting factors associated with satisfactory peripheral blood stem cell collection and the efficacy of large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) using femoral vein catheterization to harvest PBSCs with Fenwal CS 3000 Plus from normal healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. A total of 113 apheresis procedures in 57 patients were performed. The median number of MNCs, CD3+ cells, and CD34+ cells harvested per apheresis was 5.3 x 10(8)/kg (range, 0.3-11.0 x 10(8)/kg), 3.0 x 10(8)/kg (range, 0.2-6.6 x 10(8)/kg), and 7.9 x 10(6)/kg (range, 0.1-188.9 x 10(6)/kg), respectively. The median collection efficiency of MNCs and CD34+ cells was 49.8% and 49.7%, respectively. A highly significant correlation was found between the collected CD34+ cell counts and the pre-apheresis WBC counts in the donors (P = 0.013), and between the collected CD34+ cell counts and the pre-apheresis peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell counts (P<0.001). Harvesting at least >4 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells from the 1st LVL was achieved in 44 (77.2%) out of 57 donors and in 19 (90.5%) out of 21 donors with a PB-CD34+ cell count of >40/microl. There was no significant difference in the harvested MNC and CD34+ cell counts between the 1st and 2nd apheresis. The catheter-related complications included catheter obstruction (n = 2) and hematoma at the insertion site (n = 3). Accordingly, LVL using femoral venous access for allogeneic PBSC collection from normal healthy donors would appear to be safe and effective.     

Large-volume leukapheresis yields more viable CD34+ cells and colony-forming units than normal-volume leukapheresis, especially in patients who mobilize low numbers of CD34+ cells

BACKGROUND: Large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) differs from normal-volume leukapheresis (NVL) by increased blood flow and altered anticoagulation regimen. LVL is now regarded as a safe procedure for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), but it is not known whether the procedure will alter CD34+ cell quality or will be useful for patients who mobilize few CD34+ cells into peripheral blood. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The results from 82 LVL and 125 NVL (4.0-5.3 and 2.7-3.5 times the patients' blood volumes processed, respectively) were retrospectively analyzed in altogether 112 consecutive patients with malignant diseases. RESULTS: The LVL yielded significantly more CD34+ cells (4.2 x 10(6) vs. 3.1 x 10(6)/kg, p = 0.006, all patients; and 1.8 x 10(6) vs. 1.3 x 10(6)/kg, p = 0.004, bad mobilizers) and significantly higher colony-forming units (77 x 10(4) vs. 33 x 10(4)/kg; all patients and 33 x 10(4) vs. 20 x 10(4)/kg, p < 0.001, both groups). Significantly fewer leukapheresis procedures were required to obtain 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (one vs. two, p = 0.001, all patients; and two vs. three, p = 0.009, bad mobilizers). No significant differences in CD34+ cell viability and time to hematologic recovery were observed between the patients who received PBPCs harvested by NVL and LVL. CONCLUSION: Although a median platelet loss of 36 percent can be expected, LVL can be recommended as the standard apheresis method for PBPC collections in patients with malignant diseases. LVL is particularly useful in patients who mobilize a low number of CD34+ cells into the peripheral blood.     

A randomized trial of leukapheresis volumes, 7 L versus 10 L: an assessment of efficacy and patient tolerance

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous PBSC transplantation (PBSCT) has become an accepted form of therapy for a number of malignant hematologic diseases. The optimal method for the collection of PBSC is yet to be defined. Large-volume leukapheresis may be able to collect adequate numbers of PBSC with the patient undergoing fewer procedures. We routinely process 7 L of blood per leukapheresis. Hence, we elected to assess whether a modest increase in the blood volume processed would, on average, decrease the number of leukaphereses each patient needed to undergo to collect > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight. Sixty patients were randomized to undergo 7 L leukaphereses (n = 31 patients; 87 leukaphereses) or 10 L leukaphereses (n = 29 patients; 81 leukaphereses). The median number of leukaphereses required per patient to collect the target number of CD34+ cells was two (range one to five) for both groups (p = 0.83). The median number of nucleated cells collected per patient was greater for the 10 L group (8.2 x 10(8)/kg versus 5.3 x 10(8)/kg, p = 0.005), as was the median number of mononuclear cells (MNC) (4.7 x 10(8)/kg versus 3.6 x 10(8)/kg, p = 0.0001), whereas there was no statistical difference between the groups for the median number of CD34+ cells collected per patient (3.2 x 10(6)/kg versus 3.7 x 10(6)/kg, p = 0.98). Therefore, over the 18-month period of this trial, the use of a 10 L leukapheresis volume did not decrease the number of leukaphereses performed compared with a 7 L leukapheresis volume.     

The predictive value of white cell or CD34+ cell count in the peripheral blood for timing apheresis and maximizing yield

BACKGROUND: The collection of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells (PBPCs) for transplantation can be time-consuming and expensive. Thus, the utility of counting CD34+ cells and white cells (WBCs) in the peripheral blood was evaluated as a predictor of CD34+ cell yield in the apheresis component. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The WBC and CD34+ cell counts in the peripheral blood and the apheresis components from 216 collections were assessed. Sixty-three patients underwent mobilization with chemotherapy plus filgrastim, and 17 patients and 14 allogeneic PBPC donors did so with filgrastim alone. The relationship between the number of WBC and CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood and in the apheresis component was analyzed by using rank correlation and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient for CD34+ cells per liter of peripheral blood with CD34+ cell yield (x 10(6)/kg) was 0.87 (n = 216 collections). This correlation existed for many patient and collection variables. However, patients with acute myeloid leukemia had fewer CD34+ cells in the apheresis component at any level of peripheral blood CD34+ cell count. Components collected from patients with CD34+ cell counts below 10 x 10(6) per L in the peripheral blood contained a median of 0.75 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. When the WBC count in the blood was below 5.0 x 10(9) per L, the median number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood was 5.6 x 10(6) per L (range, 1.0-15.5 x 10(6)/L). A very poor correlation was found between the WBC count in the blood and the CD34+ cell yield (p = 0.12, n = 158 collections). CONCLUSION: The number of CD34+ cells, but not WBCs, in the peripheral blood can be used as a predictor for timing of apheresis and estimating PBPC yield. This is a robust relationship not affected by a variety of patient and collection factors except the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia. Patients who undergo mobilization with chemotherapy and filgrastim also should undergo monitoring of peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, beginning when the WBC count in the blood exceeds 1.0 to 5.0 x 10(9) per L.     

Allogeneic blood progenitor cell collection in normal donors after mobilization with filgrastim: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

BACKGROUND: Information on the safety and efficacy of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection in filgrastim-mobilized normal donors is still limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The PBPC donor database from a 42-month period (12/94-5/98) was reviewed for apheresis and clinical data related to PBPC donation. Normal PBPC donors received filgrastim (6 microg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours) for 3 to 4 days and subsequently underwent daily leukapheresis. The target collection was > or =4 x 10(6)CD34+ cells per kg of recipient's body weight. RESULTS: A total of 350 donors were found to be evaluable. Their median age was 41 years (range, 4-79). Their median preapheresis white cell count was 42.8 x 10(9) per L (range, 18.3-91.6). Of these donors, 17 (5%) had inadequate peripheral venous access. Leukapheresis could not be completed because of apheresis-related adverse events in 2 donors (0.5%). Of the 324 donors evaluable for apheresis yield data, 221 (68%) reached the collection target with one leukapheresis. The median CD34+ cell dose collected (first leukapheresis) was 462 x 10(6) (range, 29-1463).The main adverse events related to filgrastim administration in donors evaluable for toxicity (n = 341) were bone pain (84%), headache (54%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (13%). These events were rated as moderate to severe (grade 2-3) by 171 (50%) of the donors. In 2 donors (0.5%), they prompted the discontinuation of filgrastim administration. CONCLUSION: PBPC apheresis for allogeneic transplantation is safe and well tolerated. It allows the collection of an "acceptable" PBPC dose in most normal donors with one leukapheresis, with minimal need for invasive procedures.     

Application of whole blood and peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and new strategies for rescue after intensive cyclic chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer

The efficacy of autologous peripheral stem cells given as mobilized whole blood or leukapheresis product for hematopoietic rescue after intensive chemotherapy was studied in 34 consecutive female patients with high-risk breast cancer. All patients received six cycles of chemotherapy regimen EC (epirubicin 150 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1250 mg/m2) at 14-day intervals. In the first cycle, chemotherapy was given on day 1, and 24 h later mobilization of PBPC was started with G-CSF at a dose of 5 microg/kg/day for 13 days. In all other cycles, G-CSF was given at the same dose from day 7. On days 11, 12, and 13, leukaphereses were performed, and whole blood was collected on day 14 (the peak incidence of colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage [CFU-GM] burst-forming units-erythrocyte [BFU-E], and colony-forming unit-granulocyte-erythrocyte-macrophage-megakaryocyte [CFU-GEMM]). The second cycle of chemotherapy was started on day 15, and 24 h later, whole blood (collected in the first cycle) was reinfused, and the same was done in the third cycle. In the fourth to sixth chemotherapy cycles, leukapheresis product was used for hematopoietic rescue. The median increment of absolute values in both whole blood and leukapheresis product was as follows: CD34+ cells over baseline was approximately 17.4-fold, CFU-GM was 85.3-fold, BFU-E was 95.9-fold, and CFU-GEMM was 44.2-fold. In the cycles with whole blood support, the mean values of applied progenitors per cycle were CD34+ cells 1.52 x 10(6)/kg, CFU-GM, 1.18 x 10(5)/kg, BFU-E 2.54 x 10(5)/kg, CFU-GEMM 0.31 x 10(5)/kg. In the courses with PBPC support, the mean values of progenitors were CD34+ 2.04 x 10(6)/kg, CFU-GM 1.59 x 10(5)/kg, BFU-E 2.87 x 10(5)/kg, and CFU-GEMM 0.34 x 10(5)/kg. Leukopenia in patients supported with whole blood versus leukapheresed PBPC was as follows: grade 4, 13/6 (38.2%/17.6%), grade 3, 19/23 (55.9%/70.6%), and grade 2, 1/4 (2.9%/11.8%), respectively. Thrombocytopenia was grade 4, 11/6 (32.4%/17.6%), grade 3, 10/7 (29.4%/20.6%), grade 2, 7/13 (20.6%/38.2%), and grade 1, 6/6 (17.6%/17.6%), respectively. The median follow-up analysis was at 24.6 (7-36) months. High-risk patients previously treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 5) were not evaluated for response. In 21 patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast carcinoma the response rate (RR) was 94%, CR was 90%, and PR was 15%. No response to therapy was observed in 1 patient. In 8 patients with metastatic disease, RR was 75%, there was no CR, and PR was 75%. Two patients died during therapy. Relapse-free survival (RFS) in the adjuvant group was 23.7 (range 12-36) months and in the group with locally advanced disease was 18.2 (range 7-27) months. In the group with metastatic disease, time to tumor progression (TTP) was 12.1 (range 1-16) months. Mean duration of hospital stay for whole blood reinfusion in the second and third chemotherapy cycles was 6.7 (range 5-8) days and for PBPC in the fourth to sixth cycles was 6.2 (range 4-8) days, which at p < 0.001 was not statistically significant.     

Factors influencing collection and engraftment of CD34+ cells in patients with breast cancer following high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation

Although autologous PBPC transplantation is being used increasingly for the treatment of breast cancer, there are few data on factors influencing mobilization and engraftment in these patients. We have analyzed these factors in 70 patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer undergoing autologous PBPC transplantation. All patients were mobilized after stimulation with G-CSF, and a median of 3.16 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells (range 0.75-23.33) were infused. All patients received conditioning with a combination of cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin, and postinfusion G-CSF was administered to 60 patients. The median times to reach 0.5 x 10(9)/L and 1 x 10(9)/L neutrophils were 10 and 11 days, respectively. The median times to obtain 20 x 10(9)/L and 50 x 10(9)/L platelets were 12 and 18 days, respectively. An analysis of factors that influence CD34+ cell collection was performed by linear regression. Previous radiation therapy and increasing age were associated with lower numbers of CD34+ cells collected. Those variables that could influence the tempo of engraftment were examined by multivariate analysis using Cox regression models. The number of CD34+ cells infused was found to influence both neutrophil and platelet recovery. The use of G-CSF after transplant, accelerated neutrophil recovery, and having more than six cycles of previous chemotherapy was an unfavorable factor for recovering >50 x 10(9)/L platelets.     

Large-volume leukapheresis for peripheral blood progenitor cell collection in low body weight pediatric patients: a single center experience.

Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) have became the preferred source of stem cells for autologous transplantation because of easier accessibility, rapid engraftment, and lower tumor cell contamination. In pediatric patients is very important to optimize peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) harvesting to obtain a sufficient number of cells with a reduced number of leukapheresis. In this study we prospectively analyzed data on 43 large volume leukapheresis (LVL) from 20 consecutive low body weight pediatric patients with various malignancies. Patients' mean body weight was 16.6 kg (range, 8.9-32.0 kg), and the median age was 4 years (range, 1-10 y ears). Instead of saline, it was used irradiated and leukoreduced red blood cell (RBC) units to prime the machine in 15 patients weighting 25 kg or less. The median number of LVL was 2 (range, 1-4) and a mean of 5.2 patient's blood volume was processed per session lasting 165 min (range, 118-239). The mean number of CD34+ cells, one day before leukapheresis was 49 mm(-3) (range, 9-219). The PBPC collection yielded 24.7 x 10(8) total nucleated cells/kg (range, 6.2-74.0), 10.7 x 10(6) kg(-1) CD34+ cells (range, 3.6-53.7); 49.8 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg (range, 6.4-198.1), and 65.6 x 10(4) BFU-E/kg (range, 7.6-198.1). The platelet count decreased significantly after each procedure 39.8 +/- 9.1 x 10(9) mm(-3) (range, 18.000-76.000) (p < 0.001). In conclusion, our data show that LVL for collection of PBPC in low weight pediatric patients is a safe and efficient procedure, but it may expose the patient to the risk of thrombocytopenia.     

PBPC collection techniques: standard versus large volume leukapheresis (LVL) in donors and in patients.

Transplantations of autologous and allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) are able to assure a complete hematopoietic and immunologic reconstitution in patients. PBPC are collected by leukapheresis technique after prior mobilization therapy, but procedures and results remain still highly variable and are poorly characterized. An optimum regimen for PBPC collections has not yet been recommended, but 2-3 total blood volumes (TBV) of the donor or patient are regarded as a standard. Another promising technique is large volume leukapheresis (LVL) with processing of 3-6 TBV of donor or patient. The aim of this paper is to find the most efficient and safe collection technique for an individual donor or patient and, consequently minimize the number of procedures required. Finding the optimal collection procedure would be helpful while considering which method would be preferred in an individual donor or patient with respect to the result of mobilization, health state and required yield of CD 34+ cells for transplantation. We evaluated the results in a total of 134 standard and LVL procedures, which were performed in 21 well mobilized donors (Group I), in 65 well mobilized patients (Group II), and in 14 weakly mobilized patients (Group III) with hemato-oncological diseases. A precollection concentration of CD 34+ cells in peripheral blood higher than 20 x 10(3)/mL was considered to be the criterion for efficient mobilization. Such levels of concentration indicating the start of PBPC collections could be easily reached in Group I of donors and Group II of well mobilized patients. Heavily pretreated patients at advanced stages of disease (Group III) did not respond to mobilization sufficiently and had a concentration of CD 34+ cells lower than 20x10(3)/mL. LVL technique made it possible to obtain higher numbers of CD 34+ cells than in the standard collection in well mobilized donors (Group I), well mobilized patients (Group II), and even in weakly mobilized patients in Group III. In donors and well mobilized patients (Group I and Group II) it was possible to collect sufficient amounts of CD 34+ cells for allogeneic or for autologous transplantation from one LVL collection. The median yield of CD 34+ cells from one LVL collection was 5.5 x 10(6)/kg b.w. in donors, and 6.0 x 10(6)/kg b.w. in well mobilized patients. Due to the linear dependence of the yield of collected CD 34+ cells on the concentration of CD 34+ cells in blood, it can be used as a simple prediction of the success of collection in Group II (correlation coefficient 0.93 for standard procedures, and correlation coefficient 0.88 for LVL). In Group III of weakly mobilized patients the standard collections were usually ineffective and the relationship between the yield of CD 34+ cells/kg in the product and the precollection concentration of CD 34+ cells was much less significant (correlation coefficient 0.56 for standard procedures and correlation coefficient 0.66 for LVL). The median of CD 34+ cells collected from one standard procedure was only 0.7 x 10(6)/kg but using LVL the median increased to 1.4 x 10(6)/kg. Our results prove that the yield of CD 34+ cells in the product can be enhanced by large volume leukapheresis (LVL). Based on the results obtained, we recommend LVL in all donors and patients who can tolerate it due to a greater chance of collecting higher yields of progenitor cells while minimizing adverse reactions. LVL procedures should also be preferred in weakly mobilized patients where it is not possible to collect sufficient amounts of CD 34+ cells for transplantation using the standard regime. In weakly mobilized patients LVL provides a greater chance to at least collect a minimum amount of CD 34+ cells necessary. LVL should be used in circumstances where extremely high doses of CD 34+ cells has to be prepared, e.g. planned "tandem" transplantations or manipulations with a graft in which a significant loss of cells is expected.     

Kinetics of PBPC mobilization by cyclophosphamide, as compared with that by epirubicin/paclitaxel followed by G-CSF support: implications for optimal timing of PBPC harvest

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the mobilization kinetics of autologous PBPCs after induction with various chemotherapy regimens. With PBPC mobilization in patients with breast cancer used as a model for chemotherapy-induced PBPC recruitment, the kinetics of progenitor cells mobilized either with cyclophosphamide (CY) or epirubicin/paclitaxel (EPI-TAX) followed by the administration of G-CSF was compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included a total of 86 patients with breast cancer (stage II-IV) receiving either CY (n = 39) or EPI-TAX (n = 47), both followed by G-CSF support. The progenitor cell content in peripheral blood and apheresis components was monitored by flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ cells. PBPC collection was started when the threshold of >20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per L of peripheral blood was reached. RESULTS: The PBPC collection was begun a median of 9 days after the administration of EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF support, as compared to a median of 13 days after mobilization with CY plus G-CSF. After treatment with CY, the total numbers of PBPCs peaked on Day 1 of apheresis, and they rapidly declined thereafter. In contrast, treatment with EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF administration led to a steady mobilization of CD34+ cells during leukapheresis. The difference in the mobilization patterns with CY and EPI-TAX resulted in a greater yield of CD34+ cells per L of processed blood volume. Compared to EPI-TAX, mobilization with CY required the overall processing of 30 percent less whole-blood volume to reach the target yield of > or = 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight. After a median of three apheresis procedures, however, both CY+G-CSF and EPI-TAX+G-CSF were equally effective in obtaining this target yield. CONCLUSION: These results imply that specific PBPC mobilization as part of a given chemotherapy regimen should be taken into consideration before the planning of a PBPC harvest.     

Rituximab-ESHAP as a mobilization regimen for relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas: a comparison with ESHAP

BACKGROUND: It has previously been shown that ESHAP was an effective mobilization regimen for patients with pretreated lymphoma. To extend these observations, the efficacy and feasibility of rituximab plus ESHAP regimen in CD20+ B-cell NHL were assessed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The mobilization efficacy and engraftment characteristics were compared in the 22 patients who received the rituximab plus ESHAP (R-ESHAP) with 33 historical controls who received ESHAP. RESULTS: The two treatment groups were well matched in patient characteristics. In the R-ESHAP group, 62 pheresis procedures were performed. Apheresis procedures were started on median Day 16 (range, Days 13-18). The median number of collected CD34+ cells was 10.6 x 10(6) per kg (range, 4.9 x 10(6)-52.6 x 10(6)/kg). Nineteen (95%) patients achieved optimal peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cell (PBPC) collection, defined as at least 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to mobilization efficacy. Sixteen patients in the R-ESHAP group (73%) underwent autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation (APBPCT). The median time to absolute neutrophil count at least 0.5 x 10(9) per L was 10 days (range, 8-17 days), and the median time to a platelet count of at least 20 x 10(9) per L was 12 days (range, 7-27 days). Lymphocyte recovery was slower in the R-ESHAP group, but the rate of infectious complications was similar in the two groups. In the R-ESHAP group, the 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival after APBPCT were 63.2 and 57.4 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: Addition of rituximab to ESHAP chemotherapy did not have any adverse effects on PBPC mobilization. Further studies are needed, however, to determine whether addition of rituximab improves outcomes.     

Phase III randomized study comparing 5 or 10 microg per kg per day of filgrastim for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with chemotherapy,followed by intensification and autologous transplantation in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies

BACKGROUND: It is not known whether increasing the dose of filgrastim after mobilizing chemotherapy improves collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and leads to faster hematopoietic engraftment after autologous transplantation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, multicenter trial was carried out in patients with breast cancer, multiple myeloma, and lymphoma, in which patients were randomized to receive 5 or 10 microg per kg per day of filgrastim after standard chemotherapy to mobilize PBPCs. After high-dose chemotherapy, the components from the first two leukapheresis procedures were returned, and all patients received 5 microg per kg day of filgrastim after transplantation. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were randomized, of whom 128 were mobilized (Group A, 5 microg/kg, n = 66; Group B, 10 microg/kg, n = 62) and 112 were transplanted. Only six patients were not transplanted because of insufficient CD34+ cell numbers. The median number of CD34+ cells collected in the first two leukapheresis procedures tended to be higher in Group B than in Group A (12.0 vs. 7.2 x 10(6)/kg, NS), but after transplantation there was no significant difference in median times to platelet (9 days in both groups) or neutrophil (8 days in both groups) engraftment or the number of platelet transfusions (three in both groups). A subsequent subgroup analysis separating patients transplanted after first- or second-line chemotherapy also showed no measurable impact of filgrastim dose on the median CD34+ cell yield or on platelet engraftment in either subgroup. CONCLUSION: PBPC mobilization with chemotherapy and 5 microg per kg of filgrastim is very efficient, and 10 microg per kg of filgrastim does not provide additional clinical benefit.     

The absolute number of peripheral blood CD34+ cells predicts a timing for apheresis and progenitor cell yield in patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors

Retrospective analysis was conducted in 51 autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections using the Spectra AutoPBSC System from patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors to study the predictive value of CD34+ cell counts in the peripheral blood for the yield of CD34+ cells in the apheresis product. The correlation coefficients for CD34+ cells microL(-1) of peripheral blood with CD34+ cell yield (x 10(6) kg(-1) of body weight and x 10(5) kg(-1) of body weight L(-1) of blood processed) were 0.903 and 0.778 (n=51 collections), respectively. Products collected from patients with CD34+ cell counts below 15 microL(-1) in the peripheral blood contained a median of 0.49 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1) (range: 0.05-2.55), whereas those with CD34+ cell counts more than 15 microL(-1) contained a median of 3.72 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1) (range: 1.06-37.57). From these results, a number of at least 15 CD34+ cells microL(-1) in the peripheral blood ensured a minimum yield of 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1) as obtained by a single apheresis procedure. The number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood can be used as a good predictor for timing of apheresis and estimating PBPC yield. With regard to our results, apheresis with a possibly poor efficiency should be avoided because the collection procedure is time-consuming and expensive.     

Inverse relationship between patient peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and collection efficiency for CD34+ cells in two automated leukapheresis systems

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the CD34 cell collection efficiency (CE) of automated leukapheresis protocols of two blood cell separators (Spectra, COBE [AutoPBSC protocol] and AS104, Fresenius [PBSC-Lym, protocol]) for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) harvest in patients with malignant diseases. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPCs were collected by the Spectra AutoPBSC protocol in 95 patients (123 collections) and the AS104 PBSC-Lym protocol in 87 patients (115 harvests). Patients underwent a median of one (range, 1-4) conventional-volume apheresis procedure of 10.8 L (9.0-13.9) to obtain a target cell dose of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. RESULTS: The median overall CD34 CE was significantly better on the AS104 than on the Spectra: 55.8 percent versus 42.4 percent (p = 0.000). This was also true below (59.2% vs. 50.1%; p = 0.022) and above (51.2% vs. 41.3%; p = 0.001) the preleukapheresis threshold of 40 CD34+ cells per microL needed to collect a single-apheresis autograft. However, at > or =40 circulating CD34+ cells per microL, both cell separators achieved the target of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. The CD34 CE dropped significantly, from 59.2 percent at <40 cells per microL to 51.2 percent at > or =40 cells per microL on the AS104 (p = 0.017) and from 50.1 percent to 41.3 percent on the Spectra (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Whereas the CD34 CE was significantly different with the AS104 and the Spectra, the CD34 CE of both machines correlated inversely with peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, showing a significant decline with increasing numbers of circulating CD34+ cells. Nevertheless, at > or 40 preapheresis CD34+ cells per microL, sufficient hematopoietic autografts of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg were harvested by a single conventional-volume (11 L) leukapheresis on both cell separators.     

Hematopoietic progenitor cell large volume leukapheresis (LVL) on the Fenwal Amicus blood separator

A technique for large volume leukapheresis (LVL) for hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) collection using the Fenwal Amicus is presented. It was compared to standard collections (STD) with regard to CD34+ cell yields and cross-cellular content. Optimal cycle volumes and machine settings were evaluated for LVL procedures. A total of 68 patients underwent 80 HPC collection procedures. Because of differences in CD34+ cell yields associated with peripheral white blood cell counts (WBC), the comparison was divided into groups of 20 with WBC < or =35 x 10(9)/L (< or =35 K) and those >35 x 10(9)/L (>35 K). Baseline CD34+ cell counts (peripheral count when patient started HPC collection) were used (median 18-23 cells/microl). Significantly more whole blood (corrected for anticoagulant) was processed with LVL (LVL 20 l vs. STD 13.5 l). For < or =35 K, median CD34+ x 10(6), WBC x 10(9), RBC ml, Plt x 10(11) yields/collection were 183, 21.2, 14, 0.8, respectively, for STD vs. 307, 22.1, 11, 1.0, respectively, for LVL. For >35 K, median CD34+ x 10(6), WBC x 10(9), RBC ml, Plt x 10(11) yields/collection were 189, 32.7, 15, 1.4, respectively, for STD vs. 69, 40.8, 21, 1.3, respectively, for LVL. We have described a method of LVL using the Amicus that, in patients with pre-procedure WBC < or =35 x 10(9)/L, collects more CD34+ cells than a standard procedure with acceptable cross-cellular content. This method is not recommended when pre-procedure WBC counts are >35 x 10(9)/L.     

异基因外周血干细胞移植治疗恶性血液病的临床研究

目的 评价异基因外周血干细胞移植（ａｌｌｏＰＢＳＣＴ） 治疗恶性血液病的疗效。方法 用异基因外周血干细胞移植治疗恶性血液病１６ 例,其中急性淋巴细胞白血病５ 例（ＣＲ１ ４ 例,ＣＲ２ １ 例） , 急性非淋巴细胞白血病２ 例（ＣＲ１） ,慢性粒细胞白血病８ 例（ＣＰ５ 例,ＡＰ３ 例） ,非霍奇金淋巴瘤１ 例（ＰＲ） 。中位年龄３３（１８ ～４９） 岁。预处理方案：ＴＢＩ９ ～１０ Ｇｙ（ 分２ 次照射） ＋ ＣＴＸ １２０ ｍ ｇ／ｋｇ 或ＴＢＩ１０Ｇｙ ＋ＣＴＸ１２０ ｍｇ／ｋｇ ＋ Ｖｐ１６ ５００ ｍｇ 。预防移植物抗宿主病（ ＧＶＨＤ） 方案：ＣｓＡ＋ 短程ＭＴＸ。供者年龄中位数３２（１４ ～５２） 岁, 用ＧＣＳＦ５μｇ ·ｋｇ － １ ·ｄ － １ ×５ ～６ 天进行造血干细胞动员, 分离单个核细胞中位数９ ×１０８／ｋｇ［５ ．７９ ～１３ ．７０） ×１０８／ｋｇ］ ,ＣＤ３４ ＋ 细胞中位数１３ ．９ ×１０６／ｋｇ［５ ．６９ ～４９ ．００） ×１０６／ ｋｇ］ 。结果全部患者移植后均重建造血,仅１ 例（ＡＢＯ 血型不合） 红系延迟重建。粒细胞＞ ０ ．５ ×１０９／ Ｌ 中位数１２（１０ ～１５） 天,血小板＞ ３０ ×１０９／Ｌ 中位数１３（８ ～２４） 天