Management of penetrating abdominal stab wounds

The authors present the results of a therapeutic trial of the conservative or surgical management of penetrating abdominal stab wounds (PASW) based on clinical criteria. In a prospective series of 100 patients, 70 were treated non-operatively. Thirty patients were operated upon, twenty-one immediately and nine during the 48 h observation period. In five laparotomies no significant injuries were found. Morbidity was similar in both immediate and delayed laparotomy groups (3/21 versus 1/9). Acute alcoholic intoxication identifies a subgroup of patients that are difficult to evaluate and hence are more likely to be managed by laparotomy (chi 2 = 4.056, P less than 0.05). The authors conclude that selective surgical management of PASW based on clinical criteria is an accurate and safe procedure.     

Emergency laparoscopy for abdominal stab wounds

Background: Management strategies for abdominal stab wounds (ASW) in initially asymptomatic patients range from mandatory explorative laparotomy (EL) to conservative approaches with observation alone. Emergency diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) may play a potential role between these two extremes—hence lowering the rate of unnecessary laparotomies and keeping the rate of missed injuries to a minimum. Patients and Methods: At our institution mandatory EL was carried out in every patient with ASW until 1992. In a retrospective study the charts of 43 patients with ASW were reviewed in terms of initial diagnostic procedures, intraabdominal injuries, and course and length of hospital stay. Between 5/1993 and 4/1995 DL was performed in a prospective study in 15 patients with suspected peritoneal penetration (PP) after ASW according to a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. Results: In 17 patients (40%) EL showed no PP; 15 (35%) had significant intraabdominal injuries, while 11 patients with PP didn't have lacerations of intraabdominal organs, resulting in an overall rate of nontherapeutic laparotomy of 65%. Mortality was 6% (n= 3), average hospital stay 8 days. Primary DL could exclude PP in 10 out of 15 patients (66%). The remaining five patients (33%) showed PP: In two patients with ASW to the right upper quadrant, intraabdominal injuries could be excluded by DL, and in one patient a low-grade liver injury was treated laparoscopically, thus avoiding laparotomy in a total of 87% (n= 13). In two patients with PP laparoscopy was converted to laparotomy: no pathological finding in one case, splenectomy for spleen laceration in the second patient, resulting in a rate of nontherapeutic laparotomies of 7%. All patients in this series had an uneventful course; average hospital stay was 2.4 days. Conclusions: DL offers an important diagnostic tool in excluding peritoneal penetration in ASW, hence lowering the rate of unnecessary laparotomies. Given experience and skills, laparoscopy may be used therapeutically in selected cases of ASW. Received: 24 February 1997/Accepted: 10 August 1997     

The contribution of laparoscopy in evaluation of penetrating abdominal wounds

BACKGROUND: Penetrating abdominal wounds are traditionally explored by laparotomy. We investigated prospectively the role of laparoscopy within a defined protocol for management of penetrating abdominal wounds to determine its safety and advantages over traditional operative management. STUDY DESIGN: The study inclusion criteria were: stab and gun shot abdominal wounds, including junction zone injuries; stable vital signs; and absence of contraindications for laparoscopy. Diagnostic end points included detection of peritoneum or diaphragm violation, visceral injuries, and other indications for laparotomy. Systematic examination was undertaken using a multiport technique whenever the peritoneum or diaphragm had been violated. All repairs were done by open operation. RESULTS: A total of 40.6% of patients with penetrating trauma fulfilled study criteria (52 patients). Of these, 33% had no peritoneal penetration; 29% had no visceral injuries despite violation of peritoneum or diaphragm; 38% had visceral injuries, of which 40% (mainly liver and omentum) required no intervention. Twelve patients (23% of total) had open repairs. No missed injuries or death occurred in the study. Overall, 77% of penetrating injuries with stable vital signs avoided exploratory laparotomy. Compared with National Trauma Data Bank information for patients with the same Injury Severity Scores, hospitalization was reduced by more than 55% for the entire series. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy for penetrating abdominal injuries in a defined set of conditions was safe and accurate, effectively eliminating nontherapeutic laparotomy and shortening hospitalization.     

The utility of diagnostic laparoscopy in the evaluation of anterior abdominal stab wounds

Background

To assess if diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) is superior to nonoperative modes (serial abdominal examination with/without computed axial tomography [CAT] and diagnostic peritoneal lavage) in determining the need for therapeutic laparotomy (TL) after anterior abdominal stab wound (ASW).

Methods

Retrospective review of ASW patients. Patients were divided into group A (DL/exploratory laparotomy) to identify peritoneal violation (PV) and group B (initial nonoperative modes).

Results

Seventy-three patients met inclusion criteria. In group A (n = 38), 29 patients (76%) had PV by DL and underwent exploratory laparotomy. Only 10 (35%) underwent TL (sensitivity for PV = 100%; specificity and positive predictive value of PV in determining need for TL = 29% and 33%, respectively). In group B (n = 35), 7 patients (20%) underwent TL, yielding an improved specificity (96%) and positive predictive value (88%).

Conclusions

We find no role for DL in the evaluation of ASW patients solely to determine PV.     

The role of laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has become increasingly utilized in the trauma setting. When properly applied, it offers several advantages, including reduced morbidity, lower rates of negative laparotomy, and shortened length of hospital stay. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of laparoscopy in the management of trauma patients with penetrating abdominal injuries. METHODS: We conducted a 3-year retrospective chart review of 4541 trauma patients admitted to our urban Level II trauma center. Penetrating abdominal injuries accounted for 209 of these admissions. Patients were divided into 3 treatment groups based on the characteristics of their abdominal injuries. Management was either observation, immediate laparotomy, or screening laparoscopy. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were observed in the Emergency Department based on their initial physical examination and radiologic studies. After Emergency Department evaluation, 154 patients underwent immediate laparotomy. In this group, 119 therapeutic laparotomies, 11 nontherapeutic laparotomies, and 24 negative laparotomies were performed. A review of the negative laparotomies revealed that possibly 8 of 10 gun shot wounds and all 14 stab wounds could have been done laparoscopically. Twenty-two patients underwent laparoscopic evaluation, 9 of which were converted to open procedures. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgical techniques are particularly helpful as a screening tool for anterior abdominal wall wounds and lower chest injuries to rule out peritoneal penetration. Increased use of laparoscopy in select patients with penetrating abdominal trauma will decrease the rate of negative and nontherapeutic laparotomies, thus lowering morbidity and decreasing length of hospitalization. As technology and expertise among surgeons continues to improve, more therapeutic intervention may be done laparoscopically in the future.     

Diagnostic laparoscopy in abdominal stab wounds: a prospective, randomized study

BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy for identifying patients with abdominal stab wounds requiring surgical repair has not been defined. The potential benefits of diagnostic laparoscopy by incorporating it into the routine diagnostic workup of patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds was evaluated in a two-layer, randomized study. METHODS: From May 1997 through January 2002, stable patients without peritonitis but with demonstrated peritoneal violation were randomized (A) to exploratory laparotomy (AEL) (n = 23) or diagnostic laparoscopy (ADL) (n = 20). Simultaneously, patients with equivocal peritoneal violation on local wound exploration were randomized (B) to diagnostic laparoscopy (BDL) (n = 28) or expectant nonoperative management (BNOM) (n = 31). Hospital morbidity, length of stay, and costs were primary endpoints, with postdischarge disability being a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: In patients with peritoneal penetration (AEL vs. ADL), there were minimal differences in the therapeutic operation rate (8 of 23 [AEL] vs. 8 of 20 [ADL], p = 0.761), mortality (none), morbidity (3 of 23 vs. 2 of 20, p = 0.999), hospital stay (mean +/- SD) (5.7 +/- 2.5 vs. 5.1 +/- 4.0 days, p = 0.049), hospital costs (4.6 +/- 1.3 vs. 4.8 +/- 1.9 x 1,000 EUR, p = 0.576), and length of sick leave (34 +/- 12 vs. 29 +/- 11 days, p = 0.305). In patients with equivocal peritoneal penetration (BDL vs. BNOM), laparoscopy found more mostly minor organ injuries (7 of 28 [BDL] vs. 1 of 31 [BNOM], p = 0.022) with no significant difference in therapeutic operations (3 of 28 vs. 1 of 31, p = 0.337) or morbidity (3 of 28 vs. 0 of 31, p = 0.101), but was associated with increased length of stay (2.6 +/- 2.1 vs. 1.9 +/- 1.8 days, p = 0.022), hospital costs (4.2 +/- 1.3 vs. 1.5 +/- 1.1 x 1,000 EUR, p = 0.000), and sick leave requirements (18 of 23 vs. 8 of 28 of eligible patients, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with demonstrated peritoneal violation, laparoscopy offers little benefit over exploratory laparotomy. In patients with equivocal peritoneal penetration on local wound exploration, laparoscopy detects more mostly minor organ injuries than expectant nonoperative management but is associated with increased hospital stay, costs, and sick leave requirements. Overall, diagnostic laparoscopy cannot be recommended as a routine diagnostic tool in anterolateral abdominal and thoracoabdominal stab wounds.     

Self-inflicted abdominal stab wounds

BACKGROUND: Self-inflicted abdominal stab wounds (ASWs) are uncommon. The present study aims to characterize the clinical profile of this unique group of psychiatric-surgical patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of 23 patients with intentional self-inflicted ASWs at two urban level I trauma centres during a 10-year period. RESULTS: Most patients were males (70%), ages ranging from 21 to 82 years (mean 40 years). Seventy-four percent of patients had a previous psychiatric history and prior suicide attempts were common (41%). Half of the patients had a positive admission drug or alcohol screen. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg) was present in only two patients. Mean injury severity, revised trauma and Glasgow coma scores were 5.8, 7.7 and 14.5, respectively. The most commonly used instrument was a knife (87%). There were 1.5 external wounds per patient located primarily in the right upper quadrant (40%) and right lower quadrant (23%). These were associated with extra-abdominal wounds in 22% of cases. Local wound exploration was positive in 15 patients (65%), who all underwent laparotomy. Injured intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal organs were identified in 10 patients and included the stomach, duodenum, small bowel, colon, mesentery, inferior vena cava (IVC) and psoas muscle with a mean of 1.7 injuries per patient. Wound infection was the only post-operative complication (two patients). All eight patients with a negative local wound exploration were observed without complication. Seventy percent of patients were ultimately transferred to a psychiatric ward with a mean length of stay on the surgical service of 8 days. Only one patient died during admission due to metastatic malignant disease. CONCLUSION: Self-inflicted ASWs in suicidal patients can induce significant although most likely non-lethal abdominal and retroperitoneal injuries. This observation should guide the trauma surgeon when treating such patients.     

Role of laparoscopy in the management of visceral injuries following abdominal stab wounds

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy offers several advantages in the treatment of abdominal stab wounds. In this paper, we report our experience during 2004, where hemodynamically stable patients with stab wounds were managed laparoscopically. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January and December 2004, 8 hemodynamically stable patients (7 men, 1 woman) underwent laparoscopy for anterior abdominal stab wounds. Median age was 28.5 years (range, 17-55). All patients underwent an abdominal computed tomography (CT) prior to the laparoscopy. RESULTS: Exploration of the wound under aseptic conditions, carried out as a part of the physical examination, confirmed peritoneal penetration in 7 of the 8 cases. Abdominal CT revealed positive findings in 7 (87.5%) cases. Laparoscopy was performed after a median time of 60 minutes (range 30-90). Laparoscopic exploration evidenced peritoneal penetration in 100% of the cases and visceral lesions in 87.5% of the cases. All visceral injuries were managed laparoscopically. Median operative time was 135 minutes (range, 45-200). Operative mortality was 0% and early morbidity was 12.5%. Median hospital stay was 5 days (range, 1-11). After a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 1-28), 1 patient complained of persistent chest pain and a ventral hernia at the site of the abdominal stab wound was diagnosed in another patient. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy should be included in management algorithms in patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds who are hemodynamically stable. In addition to its diagnostic ability, this study demonstrates that laparoscopy can be an effective management modality with minimal morbidity and no mortality.     

"Awake" laparoscopy for the evaluation of equivocal penetrating abdominal wounds

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic laparoscopy is useful for the assessment of equivocal penetrating abdominal wounds, and has become the modality of choice for the evaluation of such wounds at our institution. We hypothesised that, in appropriate patients, diagnostic "awake" laparoscopy (AL) could be performed under local anaesthesia in the emergency department (ED), allowing for expedited discharge and potential cost savings. METHODS: Selected haemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominal injury underwent AL. Suitability for AL was at the discretion of the attending surgeon. Identification of peritoneal penetration by AL led to exploratory laparotomy in the operating room. Patients with no evidence of peritoneal penetration were discharged from the ED (ALneg). These patients were matched to a cohort of 24 patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy in the OR which was negative for peritoneal penetration (DLneg). Length of stay and hospital charges were compared. RESULTS: Over a 30-month period, 15 patients underwent AL without complication. No peritoneal penetration was found in 11 patients. The remaining four patients underwent exploratory laparotomy, of which two were positive for intra-abdominal injury. Mean time to discharge was 7h in the ALneg group versus 18 h in the DLneg group (p=0.0003). Cost savings on hospital charges averaged 2227 US dollars per patient in the ALneg group compared with the DLneg group. CONCLUSIONS: AL may be safely performed in the ED, allowing for expedited patient discharge. Cost savings are achieved by the avoidance of charges inherent to diagnostic laparoscopy performed in the operating room.     

The role of abdominal CT in the evaluation of stab wounds to the back

Two hundred five patients with stab wounds to the back were evaluated with CT scans using both oral and IV contrast material. One hundred sixty-nine patients had a negative scan. Thirty (17.8%) of the 169 patients were operated upon because of clinical concern. Injuries were found in two of these patients: a diaphragmatic injury in one and a combined diaphragmatic and liver injury in the other. None of the 139 patients observed developed any sequelae. Twenty of the 33 patients with a positive CT were taken to the operating room where 16 were found to have a significant injury. Seven of these 16 patients had additional injuries not identified on CT. There were four false positive scans. Thirteen patients with a positive scan and two patients with an equivocal scan were observed based upon clinical judgment. Ten of these 15 patients had minor isolated renal or hepatic injuries seen on scan. None of these developed complications. It is concluded that abdominal computed tomography, with a sensitivity of 89%, specificity of 98%, and accuracy of 97% is a reliable study in the evaluation of patients with stab wounds to the back.     

Evaluation of diagnostic peritoneal lavage in suspected penetrating abdominal stab wounds using a dipstick technique

The total protein content (g/l) and white blood cell count (cells/mm3) diagnostic peritoneal lavage was assessed using a urine dipstick in 46 patients with suspected penetrating abdominal stab wounds and equivocal physical examination. Those patients with a protein content greater than or equal to 1 g/l and white blood cell count of greater than 500 cells/mm3 were submitted to laparotomy while those with lower values underwent observation and repeat physical examination. In all, 26 patients had a positive lavage and significant injuries were found in 23 of these. Of 18 patients with a negative lavage, 17 were managed successfully without operation while one patient died from complications related to central venous catheterization. In two patients the lavage results were equivocal. One underwent a negative laparotomy and the remaining patient recovered uneventfully. The test has a 100 per cent sensitivity and 86 per cent specificity and provides an accurate, cheap, and rapid means of diagnosis of intra-abdominal injury in penetrating trauma.     

Unreliability of standard quantitative criteria in diagnostic peritoneal lavage performed for suspected penetrating abdominal stab wounds

Thirty-five patients with abdominal stab wounds in whom clinical examination was equivocal on 2 separate occasions underwent diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) prior to laparotomy. The red and white blood cell counts (cells/mm3) of the lavage effluent were compared with the operative findings. There were 26 positive and 9 unnecessary laparotomies, the latter consisting of 4 negative and 5 non-therapeutic operations. Use of the standard quantitative criteria for red cells in DPL failed to identify significant injury in eight patients (31%), while the standard white cell count missed six injuries (23%). Their combined use resulted in three missed injuries (12%). Two false-positive results occurred using the red cell count alone and four using the white cell count alone, producing a combined false-positive result in four patients (11%). Reducing the cell threshold level to exclude missed injuries would increase dramatically the rate of unnecessary laparotomies. Although the standard quantitative criteria for DPL are superior to clinical assessment in patients with equivocal findings, their use in penetrating trauma does not achieve the same diagnostic accuracy as in blunt abdominal trauma.     

Selective management of anterior abdominal stab wounds

A policy of selective management of anterior abdominal stab wounds was evaluated in 333 consecutive patients. Laparotomy was performed based upon initial clinical assessment in 165 patients. There were six deaths (3.6%), major complications in 23 patients (14%), and 28 negative laparotomies (17%). Eighteen patients developed indications for laparotomy after 10.7 +/- 2.2 hours of observation. There were no deaths, major complications in two patients (11%), and four negative laparotomies (22%). One hundred fifty patients were observed and discharged after 1.8 +/- 0.1 days. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for initial clinical evaluation were 91%, 85%, 92%, and 83%, respectively. Length of hospitalization in the initially operated and in the delayed group was 9.5 +/- 0.6 and 10.6 +/- 2.6 days (NS), respectively. Most serious intra-abdominal injuries will declare themselves on initial clinical assessment. The remainder are less severe injuries and these patients can be safely observed without undue sequelae due to delay. The use of clinical assessment alone to prompt laparotomy is also cost effective based on analysis of hospital days for initial illness. No procedures are necessary to define penetration.     

Significance of omental evisceration in abdominal stab wounds

Over a 4 year period, 115 patients presented to Parkland Memorial Hospital with omental evisceration after a stab wound to the abdomen. All patients underwent exploratory celiotomy. Serious abdominal injuries were found in 86 patients (75 percent), and half of these had two or more organs injured. The injury rate in patients with omental herniation was three times that of patients with simple stab wounds. No preoperative evaluation technique was reliable in identifying patients without injury. There were no deaths and only a 7 percent incidence of minor complications in patients who underwent negative exploration. Our data suggest that omental evisceration in a patient with an abdominal stab wound portends potentially serious injury and supports the policy of expeditious celiotomy.