Adequacy of Pacing Rate During Exercise in Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacing

Our objective was to determint; the adequate pacing rate during exercise in ventricular pacing by measuring exercise capacity, cardiac output, and sinus node activity. Eighteen patients with complete AV block and an implanted pacemaker underwent cardiopulmonary exercise tests under three randomized pacing rates: fixed rate pacing (VVJ) at 60 beats/min and ventricular rate-responsive pacing (VVIR) programmed to attain a heart rate of about 110 beats/min ar 130 beats/min (VVIR 110 and VVIR 130, respectively) at the end of exercise. Compared with VVI and VVIR 130, VVIR 110 was associated with an increased peak oxygen uptake(VVIR 110:20.3 ± 4.5 vs VVI: 16.9 ± 3.1; P < 0.01; and VVIR 130: 19.0 ± 4.1 mL/min per kg, respectively; P < 0.05) and a higher oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold (15.3 ± 2.7, 12.7 ± 1.9; P < 0.01, and 14.6 ± 2.6 mL/min per kg; P < 0.05). The atrial rate during exercise expressed as a percentage of the expected maximal heart rate was lower in VVIR 110 than in VVI or VVIR 130 (VVIR 110: 75.9%± 14.6% vs VVI: 90.6%± 12.8%; P < 0.01; VVIR 110 vs VVIR 130: 89.1%± 23.1%; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in cardiac output at peak exercise between VVIR 110 and VVIR 130. We conclude that a pacing rate for submaximal exercise of 110 beats/min may be preferable to that of 130 beats/min in respect to exercise capacity and sympathetic nerve activity.     

Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise in Children with Activity Sensing Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacemakers

The physiological benefits of activity sensing rate responsive ventricular pacing)VVIR) over fixed rate pacing)VVI) were investigated in 14 children during incremenlal cycle exercise. Based on their heart rhythm response during exercise, children were divided into two groups. Group I patients)13 ± 4 years) remained in a paced-only rhythm when exercised. Group II patients)16 ± 7 years) were paced at rest but converted to sinus rhythm with exercise. In Group I patients, the significant physioJogicol benefits of VVIR over VVI pacing were evidenced hy a 51% increase in peak heart rate)HRmax) and a 16% increase in exercise duration and maximum oxygen uptake)VO₂max). Additionally, a 27% reduction in peak oxygen pulse)O₂Pmax) was found, reflecting a similar decrease in stroke volume. The cardiorespiraiory responses of Group I and 11 patients were compared in terms of percent of predicted normal values. Although Group I patients in the VVIR mode attained a better exercise performance than in the VVI mode and a normal O₂Pmax)108% pred). their HRmax)62% pred) and VO₂max)70% pred) fell far below normal values. In comparison. Group II patients, who went into sinus rhythm, achieved normal values for HRmax)84% pred), VO₂max)90% pred), and O₂Pmax)97% pred). The higher pacing rates attained by Group I patients in the VVIR mode may have allowed them to reach not only a higher cardiac output but also a more normal stroke volume at peak exercise than in the VVI mode. However, the overall exercise performance of children paced in the VVI and VVIR modes were significantly diminished compared to the performance of children who went into sinus rhythm with exercise.)     

Clinical Study of a New Activity Sensor for Rate Adaptive Pacing Controlled by Electrical Signals Generated by the Kinetic Energy of a Moving Magnetic Ball

A new rate adaptive pacemaker (Sensorithm) controlled by an activity sensor providing electrical signals induced by a magnetic ball moving freely in an elliptical cavity surrounded by two copper coils, was implanted in ten patients; mean age of 75 years (range 64–89). Six patients had atrioventricular block and four had sinus node disease. In auto-set testing procedure during a 1-minute walk in the corridor, a slope resulting in a maximum rate of 95 beats/min was selected in every patient, and a medium reaction time was programmed. During graded treadmill exercise tests the heart rate increased 63 ± 7 beats/min to 135 ± 6 beats/min in rate adaptive pacing mode (VVIR), and 15 ± 6 beats/min (P < 0.0001) in ventricular pacing mode (VVI). The symptom-limited exercise time was 9.1 ± 1.1 minutes and 8.2 ±1.2 minutes (P = NS), and the exercise distance was 501 ± 95 meters and 428 ± 92 meters (P < 0.05) in VVIR and VVI pacing mode, respectively. The maximum oxygen uptake was 20.6 ± 2.6 mL/kg per minute in VVIR pacing and 18.1 ± 2.1 mL/kg per minute (P < 0.05) in VVI pacing. The delay time until the pacing rate increased 10% of the total rate increase at onset of treadmill exercise was 4.4 ± 0.7 seconds. Assuming a linear relation between metabolic workload and heart rate response from rest to the age predicted maximum heart rate, a deviation of heart rate ranging from 13.5 ± 11.2% to –1.6 ± 5.2% from the expected heart rate at mid-point and endpoint of each quartile of workload was observed during treadmill testing. Conclusions : By using a 1 -minute walk test for selecting an appropriate slope setting, Sensorithm provided a significant and proportional heart rate increase during exercise resulting in an improvement of exercise capacity during VVIR pacing compared to VVI pacing.     

Importance of AV synchronous pacing during low intensity exercise evaluated by oxygen kinetics

It has been shown that dual chamber pacing with preservation of AV synchrony (DDD) is superior to fixed rate ventricular (VVI) or rate responsive ventricular (VVIR) pacing modes, as evaluated by ventilatory response to exercise. Previous studies have focused on the benefits of maintained AV synchrony at maximal exercise. However, there are limited data comparing O2 kinetics in different pacing modes during low intensity exercise, representing the majority of daily activities. This study aimed to provide an evaluation of different pacing modes using O2 kinetics during low intensity exercise. Nineteen patients (age 61 +/- 18 years) with complete AV block underwent low intensity treadmill exercise (35 W) with simultaneous evaluation of symptoms and O2 kinetics in three pacing modes. The first test was performed in DDD mode followed by a second test in VVIR mode with a programmed heart rate corresponding to the sinus rate during the first test. After 6 minutes of each test, the mode was switched from DDD to VVIR and vice versa. The third test was performed in VVI mode at 70 beats/min. O2 kinetics were defined as O2 deficit (time [rest to steady state] x delta VO2-sigma VO2 [rest to steady state]) and mean response time (MRT) of oxygen consumption (O2 deficit/delta VO2). The O2 deficit was 551 +/- 134 mL in DDD pacing, 634 +/- 139 mL in VVIR pacing, and 648 +/- 179 mL in VVI pacing (P = 0.001). MRT was 49 +/- 7.8 seconds in DDD pacing, 54.7 +/- 9.5 seconds in VVIR pacing, and 57.4 +/- 11.0 seconds in VVI pacing (P = 0.002). Ten (53%) patients developed symptoms during switch from DDD to VVIR mode whereas the switch from VVIR to DDD mode was not perceived by any patient (P < 0.001). In conclusion, our study shows an impact of AV synchronous pacing and heart rate adaptation on O2 kinetics during low intensity exercise that correspond to casual daily life activities. Our observations may have clinical implications for the management of patients with complete AV block.     

Efficacy and Safety of Rate Responsive Pacing in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Angina Pectoris

The present study included 17 patients with angina pectoris and coronary artery disease in whom a rate responsive ventricular pacemaker (Medtronic Activitrax) had been implanted. All patients had an exclusively paced rhythm. Single blinded, random, cross-over treadmill tests in the rate responsive pacing mode (VVIR) and in the fixed-rate demand mode (VVI) were performed, with an interval of 4-6 weeks. Mean exercise duration increased by 25% during VVIR pacing. Maximal heart rate increased significantly during VVIR compared to VVI pacing (VVI = 74 +/- 2 bpm, VVIR = 116 +/- 8 bpm, P less than 0.001) as did the rate-pressure product (VVI = 10.850 +/- 1,124, VVIR = 16.628 +/- 2,110, P less than 0.001). Despite improved performance, the number of anginal attacks per week and the nitroglycerin consumption did not show a significant difference between the two pacing modes. It is concluded that rate responsive pacing is beneficial and safe in patients with angina pectoris and coronary artery disease.     

Quality of Life in Patients with Rate Responsive Pacemakers: A Randomized, Cross-Over Study

Eleven patients with rate responsive pacemakers (7 men, 4 women, mean age 41 years with a range of 23-60) were randomly assigned to a cross-over study in order to assess their overall exercise capacity and quality-of-life (QOL) scores. All of the pacemakers were implanted for complete AV block or sick sinus syndrome. The pacemakers were randomly programmed into VVI or rate responsive (VVIR) pacing modes for 3-week study periods in each mode. At the end of each period, an exercise test was performed and the QOL was evaluated by the "Hacettepe Quality-of-Life Questionnaire". All patients exercised longer in the VVIR mode (mean 10.54 ± 0,73 min) than in the VVI mode (mean 7.81 ± 0.62 min) (P < 0.05). QOL scores were also found to be significantly higher in the VVIR mode (mean 173.81 ± 16.22 points) compared to the VVI mode (mean 156.27 ± 21.22 points) (P < 0.01). In conclusion, our results suggest that VVIR pacing offers a better QOL in addition to an improved exercise capacity, compared to the single chamber nonrate modulated pacing (VVI).     

Short-Term and Long-Term Changes of Left Ventricular Volumes During Rate-Adaptive and Single-Rate Pacing

To evaluate the adaptation of the heart to exercise during pacing, 15 patients with permanent endocardial pacemakers were studied; nine patients had atrioventricular universal (DDD) pacemakers (Symbios 7005) and six patients had activity detecting rate-responsive ventricular (VVIR) pacemakers (Activitrax 8403). Left ventricular function in each patient during rate variable pacing was compared to ventricular function during VVI single-rate pacing. End-systolic and end-diastolic volume changes during exercise were measured by radionuclide angiography and the amount of volume change was used to assess left ventricular function. Both short-term (within 4 hours) and long-term measurements (after at least 4 weeks) were made at rest and at 50% of the maximal exercise capacity in DDD or VVIR mode and were compared with VVI single-rate pacing. All patients, when changed from DDD or VVIR mode to VVI single-rate pacing showed a significant increase of the end-diastolic volume during exercise, which increased even more after long-term VVI pacing. During long-term rate variable pacing, there was no increase of the end-diastolic volume during exercise. DDD or VVIR pacing initially showed a substantial increase of the end-systolic volume during exercise combined with a decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction, suggesting a decrease of the left ventricular contractility. After 4 weeks, contractility improved both with DDD and VVIR pacing. We conclude that short-term DDD and VVIR pacing induces a temporary impairment of left ventricular function that improves after 4 weeks, whereas long-term VVI pacing is associated with left ventricular dilatation even at moderate levels of exercise.     

Effects of Chronotropic Responsive Cardiac Pacing on Ventilatory Response to Exercise in Patients with Complete AV Block

To identify the effect of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on the ventilatory response to exercise, ten selected patients with complete atrioventricular block underwent paired cardiopulmonary exercise tests in fixed rate ventricular (WI) and dual chamber (DDD) or rate responsive ventricular (VVIR) pacing modes. Compared to VVI pacing, DDD or VVIR pacing increased peak oxygen uptake (P < 0.005) and augmented anaerobic threshold (P < 0.001), In eight patients, dyspnea was the major symptom limiting exercise with VAT pacing and this was markedly attenuated with DDD or VVIR pacing. In all patients, ventilation (VE) and the ratio of ventilation to CO₂ production (VE/VCO₂) were consistently higher with VVI pacing during exercise. To compare the response of the two pacing modes at the same workloads in an aerobic condition, we measured ventilatory variables 1 minute prior to the anaerobic threshold obtained with VVI pacing. When DDD or VVIR pacing was compared with VVI pacing, VE and VE/VCO₂ significantly decreased from 20.5 ± 5.3 L/min to 18.3 ± 5.0 L/min (P < 0.005) and from 35.9 ± 5.8 to 31.9 ± 5.0 (P < 0.003), respectively. Respiratory frequency rose significantly more with VVI pacing (P < 0.001) despite an unchanged tidal vohame. Although peak VE did not differ between the two pacing modes, VE/VCO₂ at the peak exercise increased significantly more with VVI pacing (P < 0.005). Respiratory frequency also rose more with VVI pacing (P < 0.005) and tidal volume did not change. This study suggests that chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing attenuates the exertional dyspnea by improving the ventilatory response to exercise as well as increasing the cardiac output in patients with complete atrioventricular block.     

Improvement of exercise tolerance by single lead VDD pacemaker: evaluation using cardiopulmonary exercise test

We used a cardiopulmonary test to assess the physiological benefit of single lead VDD pacing in ten patients (six men, four women; aged 32-84 years, mean 69 years) with atrioventricular block. Maximal symptom-limited treadmill exercise test using a ramp protocol was performed under VDD and VVIR or VVI pacing (VVI) in random sequence. The pacemaker was then programmed to the VDD mode, and Holter ECG was recorded in nine patients. Compared with findings during the VVI, the VDD mode had a greater chronotropic response (mean maximal heart rate, VDD 106 +/- 17 beats/min vs VVI 79 +/- 19 beats/min, P = 0.03), and was associated with prolongation of exercise duration (VDD 11.2 +/- 2.9 minute vs VVI 10.5 +/- 3.1 minute; P = 0.01), and the onset of anaerobic threshold at a higher oxygen uptake (VDD 12.4 +/- 3.4 mL/min per kilogram vs VVI 10.0 +/- 2.1 mL/min per kilogram; P < 0.01). Atrial sensing was recognized in almost all normal sinus P waves for all cases examined using Holter ECG. Thus, chronotropic response during exercise by VDD pacemaker improved exercise tolerance, indicating that a VDD pacemaker might be useful for patients requiring physical activity.     

Is Accurate Rate Response Programming Necessary?

Exercise capacity and general well-being are improved by appropriately programmed rate responsive pacemakers when compared to fixed rate units. Ten patients had activity sensing DDDR units implanted for combined AV block and sinus node incompetence. Ten patients had Sensolog activity sensing VVIR units implanted for complete heart block. The effects of over and under programming of rate response in both dual and single chamber activity sensor rate adaptive pacemakers has been assessed subjectively by visual analog scales and specific activity questionnaires and objectively by graded treadmill testing and the performance of standardized daily activities. Patients were randomly programmed to absent rate response (VVI in the Sensolog group), hyporesponsive (DDD in the dual chamber group), appropriate response (VVIR, DDDR according to Manufacturer's instructions) and over responsive (VVIR+, DDDR+) in a double-blind crossover design. Thirty percent of patients demanded early crossover from VVI, 30% from DDDR+ and 50% from VVIR+. Perception of Exercise Capability was similar to objective exercise treadmill times which were shorter in VVI than in VVIR or VVIR+ (P less than 0.05) or control subjects (P less than 0.001). There was no difference between any dual chamber mode or control subjects. General well-being was poorest in DDDR+ and VVIR+ modes despite objective improvement in exercise capacity. Symptoms were least in VVIR and DDDR and all but one patient chose appropriate programming as their overall preferred mode. Thus, even inaccurate rate response programming results in similar and improved exercise capacity compared to absent rate response but overprogramming is unacceptable to most patients, confirming that appropriate programming and sensor specificity is critical in rate responsive pacing.     

Rate Modulated Pacing Based on Right Ventricular dP/dt: Quantitative Analysis of Chronotropic Response

Right ventricular contractility increases in response to catecholamine stimulation and greater ventricular preload, factors that increase with exercise workload. Thus, the maximum systolic dP/dt may be a potentially useful sensor to control the pacing rate of a permanent pacing system. The present study was designed to test the long-term performance of a permanent pacemaker that modulates pacing rate based on right ventricular dP/dt and to quantitatively analyze the chronotropic response characteristics of this sensor in a group of patients with widely varying structural heart diseases and degrees of hemodynamic impairment. A permanent pacing system incorporating a high fidelity pressure sensor in the lead for measurement of right ventricular dP/dt was implanted in 13 patients with atrial arrhythmias and AV block, including individuals with coronary artery disease, hypertension, severe obstructive pulmonary disease with prior pneumonectomy, atrial septal defect, dilated cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, and mitral stenosis. Patients underwent paired treadmill exercise testing in the VVI and VVIR pacing modes with measurement of expired gas exchange and quantitative analysis of chronotropic response using the concept of metabolic reserve. The peak right ventricular dP/dt ranged from 238–891 mmHg/sec with a pulse pressure that ranged from 19–41 mmHg. There was a positive correlation between the right ventricular dP/dt and pulse pressure (r = 0.70, P = 0.012). The maximum pacing rate and VO_2max were 72 ± 6 beats/min and 12.61 ± 4.0 cc O₂/kg per minute during VVI pacing and increased to 124 ± 18 beats/min and 15.89 ± 5.9 cc 0₂/kg per minute in the VVIR pacing mode (P < 0.0003 and P < 0.002, respectively). The integrated area under the normalized rate response curve was 96.7 ± 45.7% of expected during exercise and 100.1 ± 43.4% of expected during recovery. One patient demonstrated an anomalous increase in pacing rate in response to a change in posture to the left lateral decubitus position. Thus, the peak positive right ventricular dP/dt is an effective rate control parameter for permanent pacing systems. The chronotropic response was proportional to metabolic workload during treadmill exercise in this study population with widely varying forms of structural heart disease.     

Activity-Sensing Rate Responsive Versus Conventional Fixed-Rate Pacing: A Comparision of Rate Behavior and Patient Well-Being During Routine Daily Exercise

Rate responsive single chamber pacing (WIR) may be the pacemaker of choice in pafients who are not suitable candidates for a dual chamber system. Several studies, most of them performed in an exercise laboratory, have shown a significantly higher exercise capacity demonstrating an improvement in cardiac output and anaerobic threshold compared to conventional fixed rate pacing (VVT). Expressing our idea that stress testing in an “artificial environment” on a bicycle or motor driven treadmill has its limitations and may be difficult to extend into patient's daily life, we designed an outdoor study imitating patient's daily activity. Twenty-one patients with an activity-sensing rate responsive pacemaker performed in a double blind fashion in VVI and VVIR mode the following test circuit: walking 170 meters on flat ground, 210 meters incline, climbing a flight of stairs, and the same circuit in reverse order, and therefore “downhill”. Heart rate behavior was recorded by Holter monitoring and patients subjective feelings of well-being, i.e. fatigue and dyspnea were also evaluated, VVIR pacing responded promptly to exercise, i.e., walking on a flat ground, but no further significant increase in pacing rate was observed in relationship to the strength of physical activity while walking inclined or climbing stairs. While patients became exhausted, a nonphysiological decrease in heart rate sometimes occurred. Despite these limitations 6 of 12 patients who had a paced-only rhythm while exercising in both VVI and VVIR mode reported feeling significantly belter in the VVIR mode, expressing less dyspnea and fatigue. In contrast, two of nine patients having only intermittently paced rhythm preferred the VVIR mode. Patients with lower ejection fraction (EF) were more likely to show subjectively a benefit while exercising in VVIR mode, compared to those with less reduced or normal EF. Despite the technical limitations of using a piezo crystal for rate adaptation, WIR pacing is an important option in paced-only patients, but it seems less beneficial in patients with only intermittent paced rhythm.     

Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers

LAU, C.-P., ET AL.: Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers. The relative hemodynamic profile between dual chamber pacing (DDD) and activity sensing rate responsive pacing (VVIR) was compared in ten patients with dual chamber rate responsive pacemakers (Synergist 11). With a double blind, randomized exercise protocol, DDDR pacemakers were programmed into VVI, VVIR, and DDD (AV interval 150 msec) modes and in seven patients the test in the DDD mode was repeated with the AV interval programmed at 75 msec. A treadmill exercise test of 6-minutes duration (2 stages, Stage 1 at 2 mph, 0% gradient and Stage II at 2 mph, 15% gradient) was performed at each of the programmed settings, with a rest period of 30 minutes in between tests. Cardiac output was assessed using continuous-wave Doppler sampling ascending aortic flow and expressed as a percentage of the value achieved during VVI pacing. During exercise, pacing rate between DDD and VVIR pacing was similar but was higher with DDD at the first minute of recovery (91 ± 4vs 81 ± 3 beat/min, respectively). Cardiac output was significantly higher at rest, during low level exercise, and recovery with DDD pacing compared with VVIR pacing (resting: 21 ± 14 vs -2 ± 7%; Stage I: 36 ± 6 vs 16 ± 7%; Stage II: 25 ± 15 vs 10 ± 8%; recovery: 26 ± 12 vs 4 ± 9%; p < 0.05 in all cases). Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher during low level of exercise in the DDD mode. Shortening of the AV interval to 75 msec did not significantly affect cardiac output during exercise, but cardiac output after exercise was reduced (2 ± 6 vs 23 ± 6% at an AV interval of 150 msec, p < 0.02). By enhancing the stroke volume, DDD pacing improves cardiac hemodynamics at rest, during low level exercise, and early postexercise recovery.     

The Effect of Rate Responsive Pacing in Patients with Angina Pectoris on the Extent of Ischemia on 201-Thallium Exercise Scintigraphy

VAN CAMPEN, L.C.M.C., et al. : The Effect of Rate Responsive Pacing in Patients with Angina Pectoris on the Extent of Ischemia on 201-Thallium Exercise Scintigraphy. In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), rate responsive pacing is considered to be contraindicated because an increase in heart rate may increase oxygen demand. Although previous studies have shown no subjective increase in ischemia during rate responsive pacing, data from objective assessment have not been documented. The goal of this study was to determine if there was an increase in ischemia on 201-Thallium (²⁰¹TI) exercise scintigraphy in this mode of pacing in patients with CAD and angina. Eighteen consecutive patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and symptomatic bradyarrhythmias with a pacemaker for more than 6 months participated in the study. In VVI and VVIR modes a symptom-limited exercise ²⁰¹TI scintigram was performed in a single blind randomized crossover fashion. Exercise duration, anginal attacks, use of nitroglycerine (NTG) tablets, blood pressure, and analysis of the scintigrams were assessed during each pacing mode. Fifteen men and three women were included (  age 65.9 ± 4.9 years, LVEF 0.44 ± 0.07  ). Four were in Class III angina pectoris, and 14 in class II. The mean exercise duration increased 28% in the VVIR group without an increase in anginal attacks per week or the use of NTG tablets. On scintigrams, no differences were seen between the two groups. One patient was withdrawn from the study because of an increase in angina pectoris (AP) attacks during VVIR pacing. Rate responsive pacing is safe and effective in patients with CAD without an increase in subjective and objective signs of ischemia.     

Comparative Evaluation of Rate Modulated Dual Chamber and VVIR Pacing

JUTZY, R.V., ET AL.: Comparative Evaluation of Rate Modulated Dual Chamber and VVIR Pacing. While dual chamber pacing is considered superior to VVI pacing at rest, there is a continuing debate as to the relative benefit of AV synchrony versus rate increase with exercise. To evaluate this question and to correlate different methods of evaluation, 14 patients with DDDR pacemakers were studied using serial treadmill exercise test with a CAEP protocol. Patients were exercised in DDD, DDDR, and VVIR modes. Echo-Doppler cardiac outputs were determined and pulmonary gas exchange was measured during exercise. There was a significant improvement in cardiac output with exercise in the DDDR versus VVIR modes, and in DDDR versus DDD modes in patients with chronotropic incompetence. There were small increases in exercise duration in DDDR versus VVIR modes, and small but consistent increases in VO, at all levels of exercise, though not statistically significant. In this group of patients, DDDR pacing was superior to VVIR pacing, and superior to DDD pacing when chronotropic incompetence was present.     

The Effects of Rate Responsive Pacing on Exercise Performance in the Postoperative Univentricular Heart

Following the Fontan operation for definitive palliation of the univentricular heart, sinus node dysfunction, and/or atrioventricular block requiring pacemaker therapy is common. In previous studies ventricular rate responsive pacing (VVI, R) resulted in improved exercise performance over VVI pacing in anatomically normal hearts with either sinus node disease or atrioventricular block. In this study, the usefulness of both VVI, R and DDD, R pacing are evaluated in the postoperative univentricular heart following the Fontan operation. Eight postoperative Fontan patients with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block underwent exercise testing using a treadmill protocol. Six patients had single chamber ventricular pacemakers and two patients had dual chambered rate responsive pacemakers. Median age at exercise testing was 14 years. Patients were tested in the VVI, VVI, R, and DDD, R modes acting as their own controls. Heart rate, work rate, oxygen consumption, and respiratory exchange ratio were monitored continuously. Heart rate was significantly increased in the rate responsive modes compared to the VVI mode. In spite of the significant increase in heart rate, there was no change in maximal work rate or oxygen consumption. There was also no significant change in oxygen consumption at ventilatory anaerobic threshold. From these data we would conclude that VVI, R pacing in postoperative univentricular hearts does not result in improved exercise performance and that further study with DDD, R pacing is needed to determine its usefulness in this group of patients.     

Pacemaker Syndrome Evaluated by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

Two patients who presented with dyspnea on effort, persisting after insertion of a fixed rate ventricular demand pacemaker (VVI) for sick sinus syndrome, were evaluated by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. During VVI pacing a heightened ventilatory response to exercise and a fluctuation of ventilation occurred. The high ventilatory equivalent for CO2 throughout exercise with VVI pacing suggests that the patients had ventilation-perfusion mismatching due to an increase in the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure caused by 1:1 ventriculoatrial conduction. Rate responsive ventricular (VVIR) pacing associated with intact 1:1 ventriculoatrial conduction exaggerated the exertional dyspnea, while rate responsive atrial (AAIR) pacing improved the ventilatory response to exercise. We suggest that a heightened ventilatory response to exercise due to ventilation-perfusion mismatching may be an important factor causing the pacemaker syndrome, and that cardiopulmonary exercise testing is useful in identifying the exercise-induced symptoms with ventricular pacing.     

The Effects of Rate-Adaptive Atrial Pacing Versus Ventricular Backup Pacing on Exercise Capacity in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Background: Atrial rate-adaptive pacing may improve cardiopulmonary reserve in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Methods: A randomized, blinded, single-crossover design enrolled dual-chamber implantable defibrillator recipients without pacing indications and an ejection fraction ≤40% to undergo cardiopulmonary exercise treadmill stress testing in both atrial rate-adaptive pacing (AAIR) and ventricular demand pacing (VVI) pacing modes. The primary endpoint was change in peak oxygen consumption (VO₂). Secondary endpoints were changes in anaerobic threshold, perceived exertion, exercise duration, and peak blood pressure.
Results: Ten patients, nine males, eight with New York Heart Association class I, mean ejection fraction 24 ± 7%, were analyzed. Baseline VO₂ was 3.6 ± 0.5 mL/kg/min. Heart rate at peak exercise was significantly higher during AAIR versus VVI pacing (142 ± 18 vs 130 ± 23 bpm; P = 0.05). However, there was no difference in peak VO₂ (AAIR 23.7 ± 6.1 vs VVI 23.8 ± 6.3 mL/kg/min; P = 0.8), anaerobic threshold (AAIR 1.3 ± 0.3 vs VVI 1.2 ± 0.2 L/min; P = 0.11), rate of perceived exertion (AAIR 7.3 ± 1.5 vs VVI 7.8 ± 1.2; P = 0.46), exercise duration (AAIR 15 minutes, 46 seconds ± 2 minutes, 54 seconds vs VVI 16 minutes, 3 seconds ± 2 minutes, 48 seconds; P = 0.38), or peak systolic blood pressure (AAIR 155 ± 22 vs VVI 153 ± 21; P = 0.61) between the two pacing modes.
Conclusion: In this study, AAIR pacing did not improve peak VO_2, anaerobic threshold, rate of perceived exertion, or exercise duration compared to VVI backup pacing in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and no pacing indications.     

Two-Year Experience with Rate-Modulated Pacing Controlled by Mixed Venous Oxygen Saturation

Mixed venous oxy-hemoglobin saturation (M_VO₂) is a physiological variable with several features that might be desirable as a control parameter for rate adaptive pacing. Despite these desirable characteristics, the long-term reliability of the M_VO₂ sensor in vivo is uncertain. We, therefore, designed a study to prospectively evaluate the long-term performance of a permanently implanted M_VO₂ saturation sensor in patients requiring VVIR pacing. Under an FDA approved feasibility study, eight patients were implanted with a VVIR pulse generator and a right ventricular pacing lead incorporating an M_VO₂ sensor. In order to accurately assess long-term stability of the sensor, patients underwent submaximal treadmill exercise using the Chronotropic Assessment Exercise Protocol (CAEP) at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months following pacemaker implantation. Paired maximal exercise testing using the CAEP was also performed with the pacing system programmed to the VVI and VVIR modes in randomized sequence with measurement of expired gas exchange after 6 weeks and 12 months of follow-up. During maximal treadmill exercise the peak exercise heart rate (132 ± 9 vs 71.5 ± 5 beats/min, P < 0.00001) and maximal rate of oxygen consumption (1,704 ± 633 vs 1382 ± 407 mL/min, P = 0.01) were significantly greater in the VVIR than in the VVI pacing mode. Similarly, the duration of exercise was greater in the VVIR than the VVI pacing mode (8.9 ± 3.6 min vs 7.6 ± 3.7 min, P = 0.04). The resting M_VO₂ and the M_VO₂ at peak exercise were similar in the VVI and VVIR pacing modes (P = NS). However, the M_VO₂ at each comparable treadmill exercise stage was significantly higher in the VVIR mode than in the VVI mode (CAEP stage 1 (P = 0.005), stage 2 (P = 0.04), stage 3 (P = 0.008), and stage 4 (P = 0.04). The correlation between M_VO₂ and oxygen consumption (VO₂) was excellent (r = -0.93). Telemetry of the reflectance of red and infrared light and M_VO₂ in the right ventricle during identical exercise workloads revealed no significant change over the first 12 months of follow-up (ANOVA, P = NS). The chronotropic response to exercise remained proportional to VO₂ in all patients over the first 12 months of follow-up. The time course of change in M_VO₂ during maximal exercise was significantly faster than for VO₂. At the 18- and 24-month follow-up exercise tests, a significant deterioration of the sensor signal with attenuation of chronotropic response was noted for 4 of the 8 subjects with replacement of the pacing system required in one patient because of lack of appropriate rate modulation. Rate modulated VVIR pacing controlled by right ventricular M_VO₂ provides a chronotropic response that is highly correlated with VO₂. This parameter responds rapidly to changes in workload with kinetics that are more rapid than those of VO₂. Appropriate rate modulation provides a higher M_VO₂ at identical workloads than does VVI pacing. Although the M_VO₂ sensor remains stable and accurate over the first year following implantation, significant deterioration of the signal occurs by 18–24 months in many patients.     

Benefit of Single Setting Rate Responsive Ventricular Pacing Compared with Fixed Rate Demand Pacing in Elderly Patients

In order to assess the value of a simple, single setting rate response option to VVI pacing, 12 patients (mean age 75.1 ± 6,2, range 62–83 years, seven males, five females) with symptomatic complete heart block were entered into a double-blind, randomized crossover trial of VVI versus VVIR (single setting rate responsive) pacing using Medtronic Activitrax pacemakers. Assessment was by time taken in seconds (sec) and Borg scale symptom score (6–20) for simple activities (standing from chair x 30; walking 800 meters; 52 steps on stairs [slow and fast pace], and incremental, noninclined maximal treadmill exercise), performed after a 4-week period with the patient in each pacing mode. Times were significantly improved in VVIR mode for standing from chair [mean ± SD] (78.7 ± 22.5 vs 70.7 ± 19.5 sec; P < 0.05), for 800 m walk (1032 ± 80 vs 885 ± 59 sec; P < 0.05), fast ascent of stairs (29.5 ± 7.7 vs 26.5 ± 5.6 sec; P < 0.02), and treadmill exercise (626.7 ± 189.5 vs 741.0 ± 170.2 sec, P < 0.005) although no difference in time for slow stair ascent was demonstrated. Symptom scores were significantly less in VVIR for standing from chair (12.7 ± 2.8 vs 10.3 ± 1.8; P < 0.01), 800 m walk (10.9 ± 2.7 vs 9.0 ± 2.4; P < 0.01), slow ascent of stairs (11.6 ± 2.1 vs 10.0 ± 2.0; P < 0.01), and fast ascent of stairs (13.0 ± 2.0 vs 11.7 ± 1.9; P < 0.02) but unchanged for treadmill exercise. Single setting VVIR pacing increases maximum exercise capacity and decreases perceived difficulty of submaximal exercise in elderly patients with symptomatic heart block. This would be a beneficial addition to most limited and multiprogrammable VVI systems for use in the elderly.