The Alcohol Deprivation Effect in C57BL/6J Mice is Observed Using Operant Self-Administration Procedures and is Modulated by CRF-1 Receptor Signaling

Background: The alcohol deprivation effect (ADE) is characterized by transient excessive alcohol consumption upon reinstatement of ethanol following a period of ethanol deprivation. While this phenomenon has been observed in rats using both bottle drinking (consummatory behavior) and operant self‐administration (consummatory and appetitive “ethanol‐seeking” behavior) procedures, ADE studies in mice have primarily relied on bottle drinking measures. Furthermore, the neurochemical pathways that modulate the ADE are not well understood. Therefore, we determined whether the ADE can be observed in C57BL/6J mice using operant self‐administration procedures and if expression of the ADE is modulated by the corticotropin releasing factor‐1 (CRF‐1) receptor. Methods: C57BL/6J mice were trained in a 2‐hour operant self‐administration paradigm to lever press for 10% ethanol or water on separate response keys. Between operant sessions, mice had access to ethanol in their homecage. Once stable responding occurred, mice were deprived of ethanol for 4 days and were then retested with ethanol in the operant paradigm for 3 consecutive days. Next, to assess the role of the CRF‐1 receptor, mice were given intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection (0, 10, or 20 mg/kg) of the CRF‐1 receptor antagonist CP‐154,526 30 minutes before ADE testing. Additional experiments assessed (i) ADE responding in which the alternate response lever was inactive, (ii) the effects of CP‐154,526 on self‐administration of a 1% sucrose solution following 4 days of deprivation, and (iii) ADE responding in which mice did not received i.p. injections throughout the experiment. Results: Mice exhibited a significant increase in postdeprivation lever responding for ethanol with either a water reinforced or inactive alternate lever. Interestingly, i.p. injection of a 10 mg/kg dose of CP‐154,526 protected against the ADE while not affecting lever responding for a sucrose solution. Finally, baseline and deprivation‐induced increases of ethanol reinforced lever responding were greater in mice not given i.p. injections. Conclusions: The ADE in C57BL/6J mice can be modeled using the operant self‐administration paradigm and increased ethanol self‐administration associated with the ADE is modulated by CRF‐1 receptor signaling.     

Increased consumption but not operant self-administration of ethanol in mice lacking the RIIbeta subunit of protein kinase A

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates that adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) is involved in the neurobiological responses to ethanol. Previous reports indicate that mice lacking the RIIbeta subunit of PKA (RIIbeta(-/-)) voluntarily consume more ethanol than wild-type controls (RIIbeta(+/+)) using 2-bottle testing procedures. Although such procedures primarily measure consummatory behavior, operant self-administration procedures allow analysis of consummatory as well as appetitive or "ethanol-seeking" behavior (i.e., lever pressing is required to gain access to the ethanol solution). Therefore, we determined whether the high ethanol consumption characteristic of RIIbeta(-/-) mice would be complemented by increased appetitive ethanol-seeking behavior in an operant paradigm. METHODS: RIIbeta(-/-) (n=8) and RIIbeta(+/+) (n=8) mice were initially sucrose-faded until they were lever responding for nonsweetened ethanol (10, 14, and 18%). Following the self-administration testing, RIIbeta(+/+) and RIIbeta(-/-) mice were given access to 2 bottles, one containing water and the other ethanol to replicate the voluntary ethanol drinking data previously from our laboratory. Finally, immediately after voluntary consumption all mice were again tested for self-administration of 10% ethanol. Alterations in the reinforcement schedule were also explored as RIIbeta(+/+) and RIIbeta(-/-) mice were tested for self-administration of 10% ethanol at FR-3 and FR-5 schedules. RESULTS: The RIIbeta(-/-) mice displayed lower operant responding for ethanol and food reinforcement compared with RIIbeta(+/+) controls. However, this effect was driven by a significant increase in lever responses made by female RIIbeta(+/+) mice. When the excessive lever responses of the female RIIbeta(+/+) mice are accounted for, the RIIbeta(-/-) mice show ethanol lever responses comparable to controls. Following operant self-administration testing, RIIbeta(-/-) mice of both sexes consumed more ethanol solution compared with RIIbeta(+/+) mice during 2-bottle testing. CONCLUSIONS: Increased ingestion of ethanol by RIIbeta(-/-) mice is likely the result of altered PKA activity within neuronal pathways that control ethanol-consummatory behaviors. Conversely, the RIIbeta subunit of PKA appears not to play a critical role in neuronal pathways that regulate appetitive behaviors directed at obtaining ethanol. Finally, increased operant self-administration of food and ethanol by female wild-type mice was absent in female RIIbeta(-/-) mice, suggesting that normal PKA signaling may be part of a general, and sex-dependent, mechanism involved with reinforcement-seeking behavior.     

Differential Reinforcement and Diurnal Rhythms of Lever Pressing for Ethanol in AA and Wistar Rats

High-drinking AA (Alko, Alcohol) and moderate-drinking Wistar rats, after ethanol drinking experience in their home cages, were housed continually in operant chambers with free access to water and food. Ethanol and water could be obtained by lever pressing on a concurrent FR1:FR1 schedule. The AA rats readily learned the operant response for oral ethanol, responded significantly more for ethanol than water, and increased ethanol responding when the fixed-ratio schedule for it was increased from FR1 to FR2 and FR4. This indicates that ethanol was serving as a reinforcer for the AAs. In contrast, the Wistars showed little evidence for ethanol reinforcement. Both AAs and Wistars had a three-peak pattern of ethanol responding during the dark phase, but peaks for the Wistars preceded those for the AAs by 1 or 2 hr. The patterns were similar when on an FR4 schedule, which greatly reduced the amount of alcohol, suggesting that they are not controlled by blood alcohol levels. The difference between the AA and Wistar patterns may, however, be related to the differential ethanol reinforcement.     

Effects of Ethanol Concentration and Fixed-Ratio Requirement on Ethanol Self-Administration by P Rats in a Continuous Access Situation

Rats, from the alcohol preferring (P) line, were placed in operant chambers in which food pellets, water, and 10% ethanol (v/v) were available continuously for 23 hr/day. During Experiment 1, the effects of changing ethanol concentration and response requirement for ethanol were examined. Ten percent and 20% ethanol (v/v) were available on two fixed ratio (FR) schedules, FR 1 and FR 4, for 2 weeks each. During Experiment 2, the effects of increasing the response requirement for ethanol were investigated. Starting with FR 4, the FR requirement for ethanol doubled during 2-week intervals until FR 32 was in effect. For the final phase of these studies, water was placed in the dipper for 1 week followed by a return to 10% ethanol in the dipper.
The results from Experiment 1 indicated that when the FR requirement was decreased from FR 4 to FR 1, ethanol-reinforced responding decreased but total daily intake increased. Lowering the FR requirement did not affect the number of ethanol bouts per day but bout size increased. Ethanol concentration had no effect on bout size but the number of bouts per day decreased when the concentration was increased to 20%. Since bout size was unchanged by increasing the ethanol concentration, intake per bout increased at 20% ethanol. The results from Experiment 2 indicated that increasing the response requirement for ethanol decreases ethanol intake. When water was placed in the dipper, responding decreased to the lowest levels observed in the experiment. When ethanol was returned to the dipper, responding returned to baseline levels. Overall, the results indicate that while P rats may consume more ethanol than other lines of rats, their behavior can be modified by environmental variables in a manner somewhat similar to heterogeneous nonselected Long-Evans rats.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred mice

BACKGROUND: Two of the most widely used mouse strains for studying the behavioral effects of ethanol are C57BL/6J (B6) and DBA/2J (D2) mice. These strains exhibit marked differences in behavioral and physiological responses to ethanol. The subjective discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol may play a role in ethanol abuse, but the discriminative stimulus profile of ethanol has not been compared in B6 and D2 mice. Examination of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in B6 and D2 mouse strains may enhance our understanding of the relationship between the subjective effects of ethanol and other ethanol-induced behavioral effects. METHODS: Twelve adult male C57BL/6J mice and 12 male DBA/2J mice were trained to discriminate 1.5 g/kg ethanol from saline in daily 15 min, milk-reinforced operant sessions. After training, ethanol substitution and response-rate suppression dose response curves were determined for ethanol, midazolam, diazepam, pentobarbital, pregnanolone, 4,5,6,7-Tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol (THIP), dizocilpine, and morphine. RESULTS: D2 mice learned the ethanol discrimination significantly more quickly than did B6 mice. Ethanol, midazolam, pregnanolone, and dizocilpine fully substituted for ethanol in both strains. Pentobarbital was more potent in producing ethanol-like discriminative stimulus effects in D2 than B6 mice. Midazolam and diazepam were significantly more potent in suppressing response rates in D2 than B6 mice. Morphine failed to substitute for ethanol in either strain, but the ED50 for morphine suppression of responding was significantly lower in B6 than D2 mice. CONCLUSIONS: The initial stimulus effects of 1.5 g/kg ethanol may be more salient in D2 than B6 mice. This does not appear to result from differences in the neurotransmitter systems that mediate ethanol's discriminative stimulus effects. In both strains, gamma-aminobutyric acid-positive modulators and a noncompetitive NMDA antagonist substituted for ethanol. However, strain differences did exist in the potency of gamma-aminobutyric acid-positive modulators and morphine for suppressing operant responding.     

Ethanol reinforcement in nondeprived mice: effects of abstinence and naltrexone

BACKGROUND: Operant experiments which indicate that ethanol can serve as a reinforcer to maintain lever responding during limited periods of access have not been conducted on non-food-deprived mice, as they have for rats and monkeys. Furthermore, there are no reports of the effects of chronic ethanol and subsequent abstinence on ethanol reward in mice. Finally, although naltrexone reduces responding for ethanol in food-deprived mice, the effects of the drug on ethanol reward for non-food-deprived mice have not been reported. METHODS: In three experiments, lever responding for ethanol (10-12%) was established in C57BL/6 (B6) mice by using either sucrose or saccharin fading procedures commonly used for rats. Experiment 1 examined both appetitive and consummatory responses while sucrose was faded from the ethanol solutions. Experiment 2 examined lever responding and ethanol intake (1) during saccharin fading; (2) when reinforcement schedules, reward availability, and primary conditioned reinforcers were manipulated; and (3) when mice were allowed chronic ethanol consumption followed by forced abstinence. Experiment 3 examined the effects of low doses of naltrexone on ethanol reward. RESULTS: Lever responding for ethanol can be established in non-food-deprived mice with the sucrose and saccharin fading procedures commonly used for rats. Lever responses increased with decreases in the reinforcer and increases in schedule demand, which indicated the reward value of the ethanol solution. Removal of ethanol from the solution reduced consumption with no change in the appetitive, instrumental response, which indicated that the two responses were under control of different stimuli, perhaps mediated by different neural mechanisms. Forced abstinence after chronic ethanol exposure increased responding for the drug, which suggested increased reward value. Naltrexone reduced responding as previously reported for food-deprived B6 mice. CONCLUSIONS: Ethanol appears to serve as a reinforcer for non-food-deprived or non-water-deprived B6 mice. Its reinforcing effects are increased by forced abstinence after chronic exposure and are decreased by naltrexone.     

Comparison of Alcohol-Preferring and Nonpreferring Selectively Bred Rat Lines. II. Operant Self-Administration in a Continuous-Access Situation

Several rat lines have been developed using preference/nonpreference and daily ethanol intake in the homecage as criteria for selective breeding. Using these lines, behavioral and neural factors that may underlie the genetic basis for the control of ethanol consumption have been examined. In this paper, we report data from eight of these selected lines: the Alcohol-Preferring (P) and Alcohol-Nonpreferring (NP), the Alcohol-Accepting (AA) and Alcohol-Nonaccepting (ANA), and the High Alcohol Drinking (HAD1 and HAD2) and Low Alcohol Drinking (LAD1 and LAD2) rats. All lines were tested using operant procedures and the same protocols for both the ethanol self-administration initiation and measurement of continuous-access ethanol consumption. During continuous access, the animals were housed in operant chambers with access to 10% (v/v) ethanol after responses on one lever, food pellets (45 mg) after responses on a second lever, and water in a drinking tube that was connected to a drinkometer circuit Under these procedures, both similarities and differences among the selected lines on continuous-access operant ethanol intake were observed. For example, overall total homecage ethanol drinking was similar for the AA and both HAD lines. When examined in the operant continuous-access situation, however, the AA rats displayed a different consumption pattern, compared with the HAD lines. Data suggest that the frequency of drinking bouts was a primary factor in the phenotypic homecage selection of the preferring lines that was revealed by the use of the continuous-access operant procedure. In general, data suggest that genes related to ethanol preference and intake in homecage continuous-access situations may not be identical to those related to ethanol's reinforcing function in operant continuous-access conditions. Because ethanol consumption appears to be controlled by different drinking patterns across lines, the selected lines provide for a variety of models to understand how varying genotypes can impact ethanol consumption.     

Operant self-administration of ethanol in Sardinian alcohol-preferring rats

BACKGROUND: "Work" for ethanol, that is, the ability of a laboratory animal to press a lever to gain access to ethanol, has been proposed as (a) a requirement for definition of an animal model of alcoholism and (b) a measure of ethanol-reinforcing properties. The present study evaluated oral self-administration of ethanol under an operant (lever pressing) procedure in selectively bred Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) and alcohol-nonpreferring (sNP) rats. METHODS: Rats from both lines were initiated to self-administer 10% ethanol, on a fixed ratio 1 schedule and in daily 30 min sessions, by using the Samson sucrose fading procedure. Subsequently, rats were exposed to increasing concentrations of ethanol up to 30% on a fixed ratio 4 schedule. Finally, the extinction responding for ethanol, defined as the maximal number of lever responses reached by each rat in the absence of ethanol reinforcement, was determined. RESULTS: The results indicated that sP rats acquired and maintained lever pressing for ethanol, self-administering mean amounts of ethanol in the range of 0.6 to 1.1 g/kg/session, which gave rise to mean blood ethanol levels in the 30 to 45 mg% range. Extinction responding for ethanol in sP rats averaged 73. In contrast, once sucrose was faded out, sNP rats displayed minimal levels of responding for ethanol, and extinction responding averaged 6. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study extend to the sP/sNP rat lines the finding that ethanol can be established as a reinforcer in selectively bred alcohol-preferring rats, whereas it has modest, if any, reinforcing properties in alcohol-nonpreferring rats.     

Breakpoint Determination and Ethanol Self-Administration Using an Across-Session Progressive Ratio Procedure in the Rat

BACKGROUND: Progressive ratio schedules are used to determine the "breakpoint" or limit to the amount of "work" that a subject is willing to perform to obtain a reinforcer. Reinforcing efficacy is inferred from the breakpoint values, which are typically measured in a single session by increasing the number of responses required for successive reinforcer presentations. This procedure is not feasible, however, when assessing the reinforcing efficacy of a substance that can change as a function of its physiological actions during self-administration, as in the case of ethanol. METHODS: The present study made use of a procedure that increased the response requirement across single daily sessions rather than within a session. Completion of the response requirement in each daily session resulted in the presentation of a drinking tube that allowed for self-administration of ethanol for a 20-min period. This procedure made possible the assessment of ethanol-directed appetitive (number of lever presses) and consummatory (number of licks and intake volume) behaviors. Reliable responding for 10% ethanol was initiated using sucrose-substitution on a fixed ratio (FR) 4 schedule in male Long Evans rats. Then four successive breakpoint determinations were made which were separated by a return to the FR4 schedule to re-establish baseline responding. RESULTS: The results indicated that there was an increase in breakpoint values from the first to the second determination, which was then stable over the following three determinations. Individual rats reached breakpoints as high as 240 lever presses to receive access to 10% ethanol and maintained ethanol intake over sessions in the 1.0 g/kg range. Ethanol intake (g/kg), however, was stable across all four determinations (mean 0.86 +/- 0.06 to 1.01 +/- 0.10). Moreover, ethanol intake was not related to the preceding appetitive responding, as no differences between intake on the session before a breakpoint (high FR) and the following baseline period (FR4) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This model provides an assessment of the distinct mechanisms that mediate ethanol-seeking versus ethanol consumption in subjects that drink measurable amounts of ethanol, with the appetitive behaviors not altered by the pharmacological effects of ethanol.     

Alcohol Self-Administration in a Nonrestricted Access Situation with Alcohol-Preferring (P) Rats

Genetic variables have been implicated as contributing factors in the development of alcoholic behavior. Rats bred selectively for alcohol preference have been used in laboratory studies to investigate the role of such variables. In the present study, rats from the alcohol preferring (P) line were placed in operant chambers in which food pellets, water, and 10% ethanol (v/v) were available continuously for 23 hr/day. Food pellets (45 mg) were presented on an FR 1 schedule of reinforcement, while ethanol was presented in a 0.1 ml dipper on an FR 4 schedule of reinforcement. Water was available in a drinking tube with licks monitored by a drinkometer. Data were analyzed in terms of both total daily intakes and computer defined bouts. The P rats showed greater daily ethanol intakes compared with Long-Evans (LE) animals previously studied under similar access conditions. The major difference in intake was a result of the P rats having a greater number of daily ethanol drinking bouts, while having only a slight increase in individual bout size. These data indicate that genetic selection for ethanol preference may result in the regulation of ethanol intake by means of changes in the frequency of ethanol drinking bouts but not by changes in bout size.     

Effects of ethanol exposure on subsequent acquisition and extinction of ethanol self-administration and expression of alcohol-seeking behavior in adult alcohol-preferring (P) rats: I. Periadolescent exposure

Background The current study examined the effects of ethanol (EtOH) drinking during periadolescence on the subsequent acquisition and extinction of operant self‐administration of EtOH and expression of alcohol‐seeking behavior in adult alcohol‐preferring (P) rats to test the hypothesis that alcohol drinking during periadolescence produces enduring alterations that enhance the reinforcing properties of EtOH. Methods Periadolescent female P rats were given 24 hr free‐choice access to 15% (v/v) EtOH starting at postnatal day (PND) 30 and ending on PND 60 or were similarly housed and received water only. On PND 75, without any prior training, periadolescent alcohol‐drinking and periadolescent alcohol‐naïve rats were placed in standard two‐lever (15% EtOH and water) chambers to examine acquisition of EtOH self‐administration with a fixed ratio (FR) 1 schedule of reinforcement. After the acquisition phase and after stable responding was established on an FR5 for EtOH and FR1 for water, P rats underwent extinction training for both EtOH and water rewards. After extinction training and a 2 week home cage period, rats were returned to the operant chambers in the absence of reward for seven consecutive sessions (Pavlovian spontaneous recovery). After this testing period, animals were maintained in their home cage for a week before being returned to the operant chambers and allowed to respond for EtOH and water (reacquisition). Results Compared with periadolescent alcohol‐naïve rats, periadolescent alcohol‐drinking rats acquired EtOH responding sooner (i.e., in the first acquisition session), displayed a greater resistance to extinguish EtOH responding (i.e., higher levels of responding in sessions 4–6), had higher responding for more sessions on the EtOH lever in the absence of reward after a prolonged home cage rest period, and had a more prolonged elevated level of EtOH responding during reacquisition (four sessions versus one session). Conclusions Overall, the results suggest that periadolescent EtOH drinking by P rats produced long‐lasting alterations in the reinforcing effects of alcohol, which increased the likelihood that alcohol drinking would be initiated in adulthood, decreased the likelihood that once adult alcohol drinking began it could be extinguished easily, and increased the potential for relapse.     

Differential Changes in Sucrose/Ethanol and Sucrose Maintained Responding by Independently Altering Ethanol or Sucrose Concentration

Increased reinforcing efficacy of sucrose/ethanol solutions in comparison to sucrose solutions has been previously demonstrated. However, the contribution of the components of the sucrose/ethanol solution is not well defined. The present study used a multiple schedule of reinforcement to evaluate the differential changes in reinforcer presentations as sucrose or ethanol concentrations were altered. Male Long-Evans rats were trained to press a lever on a multiple fixed ratio 4-fixed ratio 4 schedule which was composed of alternating 2-min components. During one component, 5% sucrose/10% ethanol was presented as the reinforcer and, in the second component, 5% sucrose was presented. Independent manipulations of the ethanol concentration (0,5, and 20%) in the sucrose/ethanol solution or sucrose concentration (0, 10, and 20%) in the sucrose solution were then performed. Increasing the ethanol concentration in the sucrose/ethanol solution resulted in decreases in reinforcer delivery but increases in ethanol intake (grams per kilogram) and total session caloric intake. Increasing the sucrose concentration in the sucrose solution resulted in significant increases in sucrose reinforcer delivery and total session caloric intake. During the concentration manipulations, the number of reinforcers presented of the unchanged reinforcer was not affected. Differential changes in the pattern of reinforcer presentation after ethanol and sucrose concentration manipulations during successive access periods suggest that sucrose and sucrose/ethanol maintained responding are differentially regulated. Changes in sucrose maintained responding after increases in the sucrose concentration were observed early in the session suggesting a strong influence of taste in regulating intake. Changes in sucrose/ethanol maintained responding after increases in the ethanol concentration occurred later in the session and suggest that postingestive effects (i.e., pharmacology) play a major role in the regulation of sucrose/ethanol intake. In addition, the differential patterns of sucrose/ethanol and sucrose maintained behavior suggest that the ethanol component of the sucrose/ethanol solution plays an important role in maintaining sucrose/ethanol reinforced behavior.     

Differential rearing conditions alter operant responding for ethanol in outbred rats

BACKGROUND: Differential rearing environments affect a number of behaviors displayed by rats in adulthood. For example, rats reared in an impoverished condition (IC; reared alone in hanging metal cages), social condition (SC; reared in standard shoebox cages, 2 per cage), or enriched condition (EC; reared in a large metal cage with bedding, 14 novel objects, and 10 cohorts) display clear differences in the amount of drug they consume and/or self-administer through operant responding. Animals reared in an EC consume greater amounts of ethanol compared with rats reared in an IC when provided free access, but it is not known how differential rearing conditions affect operant responding for ethanol. METHODS: Twenty-eight male Long-Evans rats were reared in 1 of 3 environments (IC, SC, or EC) during postnatal days 21 to 111. At the conclusion of the rearing period, all rats underwent sucrose/ethanol fading and then were tested for lever press responding for 10% ethanol as well as ethanol preference. RESULTS: Rats reared in an IC responded for 10% ethanol at significantly higher rates than SC and EC rats. A greater percentage of IC rats were able to switch lever responding when the ethanol availability was changed to a second lever. Lastly, the IC group was the only one to display a clear preference for 10% ethanol when both this fluid and water were available. CONCLUSION: Rats reared in an IC show greater proclivity to respond operantly for 10% ethanol compared with rats raised in either SC or EC (which did not differ from each other). These findings agree with a number of studies that have shown isolate reared animals to consume greater amounts of ethanol compared with their socially reared counterparts yet contrast some studies showing EC animals consume greater amounts of ethanol than IC rats. The current findings illustrate that rearing environment also plays an important role in an animal's proclivity to respond for ethanol.     

Ethanol-Reinforced Responding by AA and ANA Rats Following the Sucrose-Substitution Initiation Procedure

Ethanol-reinforced responding was initiated in male AA and ANA rats using the sucrose-substitution procedure. Before the initiation procedure, a homecage, two-bottle preference test was conducted. The rats were then trained to respond on an Fixed-Ratio 1 schedule with sucrose reinforcement. Over sessions, ethanol was added gradually to the sucrose solution as the concentration of sucrose was reduced until 10% ethanol (v/v) alone functioned as the reinforcer for lever pressing. The schedule of reinforcement was then increased to Fixed-Ratio 4. Next, the ethanol concentration presented as the reinforcer was increased over weeks to 15%, 20%, 30%, and then returned to 10%. A second homecage test was then performed. The results showed that the AA and ANA lines differed significantly on preference and intake (g/kg) during the homecage preference tests. There was a significant increase in preference during the second homecage test. During sucrose substitution, initial large differences in responding were observed between the lines. When the ethanol concentration was increased, intake (grams per kilogram) increased for the AA line but not for the ANA line. These effects were a function of no change in responding by the AA rats as concentration was increased and a decrease in responding by the ANA rats at the higher concentrations (20% and 30%). Taken together, data indicate that ethanol can function as a positive reinforcer for the behavior of AA and ANA rats. Even though 10% ethanol functioned as a reinforcer similarly for the two lines, ethanol intake in the AA line was significantly greater at the higher concentrations of ethanol, suggesting that ethanol functioned as a qualitatively different reinforcer for the AA rats, compared with the ANA rats.     

Effects of Manipulating Food Availability on Ethanol Self-Administration by P Rats in a Continuous Access Situation

Male rats from the alcohol-preferring (P) line were housed in operant chambers in which food, water, and ethanol (10% v/v) were available continuously 23 hr per day. Over a period of weeks, the fixed ratio (FR) requirement for food reinforcement was gradually increased from FR 1 to FR 64. The response requirements for water and ethanol remained constant throughout the experiment. As the FR requirement for food reinforcement increased, the total number of food-reinforced responses increased significantly, whereas the total number of food pellets delivered per day and total calories per day decreased significantly. Conversely, ethanol intake (g/kg) and the percentage of total calories from ethanol increased significantly as the response requirement for food reinforcement increased. The increase in ethanol intake was accounted for largely by an increase in the number of ethanol drinking bouts per day rather than an increase in the number of dippers presented per bout. The results support the hypothesis that the manipulation of environmental variables, such as FR requirement for food reinforcement, can influence the ethanol self-administration of P rats; an effect observed previously with nonselected Long-Evans rats.     

Effects of food availability and administration of orexigenic and anorectic agents on elevated ethanol drinking associated with drinking in the dark procedures

Background: Drinking in the dark (DID) procedures have recently been developed to induce high levels of ethanol drinking in C57BL/6J mice, which result in blood ethanol concentrations reaching levels that have measurable affects on physiology and/or behavior. The present study determined if increased ethanol drinking associated with DID procedures may be motivated by caloric need rather than by the postingestive pharmacological effects of ethanol. To this end, food availability was manipulated or mice were given peripheral administration of orexigenic or anorectic agents during DID procedures. Methods: C57BL/6J had 2‐hours of access to the 20% (v/v) ethanol solution beginning 3‐hours into the dark cycle on days 1 to 3, and 4‐hours of access to the ethanol bottle on day 4 of DID procedures. In Experiment 1, the effects of food deprivation on ethanol consumption during DID procedures was assessed. In Experiments 2 and 3, mice were given intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of the orexigenic peptide ghrelin (0, 10 or 30 mg/kg) or the anorectic protein leptin (0 or 20 μg/g), respectively, before access to ethanol on day 4 of DID procedures. In Experiment 4, hourly consumption of food and a 0.05% saccharin solution were assessed over a period of hours that included those used with DID procedures. Results: Consistent with previous research, mice achieved blood ethanol concentrations (BECs) that ranged between 100 and 150 mg% on day 4 of DID experiments. Neither food deprivation nor administration of orexigenic or anorectic compounds significantly altered ethanol drinking with DID procedures. Interestingly, mice exhibited their highest level of food and saccharin solution consumption during hours that overlapped with DID procedures. Conclusions: The present observations are inconsistent with the hypothesis that C57BL/6J mice consume large amounts of ethanol during DID procedures in order to satisfy a caloric need.     

Initiation of Ethanol Reinforcement using a Sucrose-Substitution Procedure in Food- and Water-Sated Rats

Rats, maintained on free access to both food and water, were trained to press a lever to obtain a 20% sucrose solution. When presentation of the sucrose solution was maintaining responding, low ethanol concentrations were added to the solution. Over 25 sessions, the solution presented as reinforcement was gradually reduced in sucrose concentration until a 10% ethanol solution with no sucrose was presented. Following this initiation procedure, ethanol concentrations up to and including 40% ethanol were found to maintain responding. At the higher ethanol concentrations, the rats consumed doses of ethanol between 0.90 and 0.95 g/kg in the 30-min session. When a concurrent choice between ethanol and water was available in the operant chamber, the rats responded on the lever associated with 10% ethanol presentation. Home cage preference between ethanol and water was found to be altered following the operant ethanol experience with the rats acceptability for 10% ethanol increased prior to the start of the experiment. This initiation procedure provides another manner in which ethanol reinforcement can be instigated in animals that have not been either food- or fluid-deprived. It is hypothesized that mechanisms which may regulate the intravascular and intragastric self-administration of ethanol may also be operating when the oral route is employed.     

Fetal Exposure to Moderate Ethanol Doses: Heightened Operant Responsiveness Elicited by Ethanol-Related Reinforcers

Background: Prenatal exposure to moderate ethanol doses during late gestation modifies postnatal ethanol palatability and ingestion. The use of Pavlovian associative procedures has indicated that these prenatal experiences broaden the range of ethanol doses capable of supporting appetitive conditioning. Recently, a novel operant technique aimed at analyzing neonatal predisposition to gain access to ethanol has been developed. Experiment 1 tested the operant conditioning technique for developing rats described by Arias and colleagues (2007) and Bordner and colleagues (2008) . In Experiment 2, we analyzed changes in the disposition to gain access to ethanol as a result of moderate prenatal exposure to the drug. Methods: In Experiment 1, newborn pups were intraorally cannulated and placed in a supine position that allowed access to a touch‐sensitive sensor. Paired pups received an intraoral administration of a given reinforcer (milk or quinine) contingent upon physical contact with the sensor. Yoked controls received similar reinforcers only when Paired pups activated the circuit. In Experiment 2, natural reinforcers (water or milk) as well as ethanol (3% or 6% v/v) or an ethanol‐related reinforcer (sucrose compounded with quinine) were tested. In this experiment, pups had been exposed to water or ethanol (1 or 2 g/kg) during gestational days 17 to 20. Results: Experiment 1 confirmed previous results showing that 1‐day‐old pups rapidly learn an operant task to gain access to milk, but not to gain access to a bitter tastant. Experiment 2 showed that water and milk were highly reinforcing across prenatal treatments. Furthermore, general activity during training was not affected by prenatal exposure to ethanol. Most importantly, prenatal ethanol exposure facilitated conditioning when the reinforcer was 3% v/v ethanol or a psychophysical equivalent of ethanol’s gustatory properties (sucrose–quinine). Conclusions: The present results suggest that late prenatal experience with ethanol changes the predisposition of the newborn to gain access to ethanol‐related stimuli. In conjunction with prior literature, this study emphasizes the fact that intrauterine experience with ethanol not only augments ethanol’s palatability and ingestion, but also facilitates the acquisition of response–stimulus associations where the drug acts as an intraoral reinforcer.     

Association between ethanol and sucrose intake in the laboratory mouse: exploration via congenic strains and conditioned taste aversion

BACKGROUND: A substantial body of literature indicates that intakes of "sweet" solutions and ethanol are positively correlated across inbred strains of rats and mice but there has been speculation that the correlation is fortuitous and there is no agreement on the underlying mechanism. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed the correlation between intake of sucrose and ethanol in congenic mice created by backcrossing alleles favoring sucrose intake from the BXD RI-5 strain into DBA/2J. In addition, to probe more specifically the interrelationship between intake of the two solutions, we examined aversion generalization from sucrose to ethanol in C57BL/6J mice. Among the congenic mice, a statistically significant product-moment correlation of r = 0.36 (p < 0.02) was found between 6-hr intake of sucrose corrected for differences in baseline water intake and preference for 10% ethanol presented in a 96-hr 2-bottle test. Furthermore, C57BL/6J male mice conditioned to avoid a 0.2 M sucrose solution generalized their aversion to a 10% ethanol solution presented in the same 2-bottle test, drinking 42.1 +/- 9.38% (mean +/- SE) of their total fluid intake from the ethanol tube, compared with the control group mean of 69.86 +/- 8.84%. CONCLUSIONS: The positive association between intake of sucrose and ethanol in congenic mice provides strong evidence that the previously demonstrated genetic correlation between intake of these solutions is not the result of fortuitous fixation of unrelated alleles and provides suggestive evidence that, at least in the B6/D2 lineage, the genetic association between intakes of the two solutions reflects close linkage or the pleiotropic effects of the same genes. The demonstration that a conditioned taste aversion to sucrose generalized to ethanol in the C57BL/6J inbred mouse strain is an extension of similar observations in outbred rats and specifically demonstrates that intake of the two solutions is controlled by some of the same physiologic or neurological processes and thus is consistent with the pleiotropic interpretation of the genetic correlation.     

Increased drinking during withdrawal from intermittent ethanol exposure is blocked by the CRF receptor antagonist D-Phe-CRF(12-41)

BACKGROUND: Studies in rodents have determined that intermittent exposure to alcohol vapor can increase subsequent ethanol self-administration, measured with operant and 2-bottle choice procedures. Two key procedural factors in demonstrating increased alcohol intake are the establishment of stable alcohol self-administration before alcohol vapor exposure and the number of bouts of intermittent vapor exposure. The present studies provide additional behavioral validation and initial pharmacological validation of this withdrawal-associated drinking procedure. METHODS: Studies at 2 different sites (Portland and Scripps) examined the effect of intermittent ethanol vapor exposure (3 cycles of 16 hours of ethanol vapor+8 hours air) on 2-hour limited access ethanol preference drinking in male C57BL/6 mice. Separate studies tested 10 or 15% (v/v) ethanol concentrations, and measured intake during the circadian dark. In one study, before measuring ethanol intake after the second bout of intermittent vapor exposure, mice were tested for handling-induced convulsions (HICs) indicative of physical dependence on ethanol. In a second study, the effect of bilateral infusions of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor antagonist D-Phe-CRF(12-41) (0.25 microg/0.5 microL) into the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) on ethanol intake was compared in vapor-exposed animals and air controls. RESULTS: Intermittent ethanol vapor exposure significantly increased ethanol intake by 30 to 40%, and the mice had higher blood ethanol concentrations than controls. Intra-amygdala infusions of D-Phe-CRF(12-41) significantly decreased the withdrawal-associated increase in ethanol intake without altering ethanol consumption in controls. Following the second bout of intermittent vapor exposure, mice exhibited an increase in HICs, when compared with their own baseline scores or the air controls. CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent alcohol vapor exposure significantly increased alcohol intake and produced signs of physical dependence. Initial pharmacological studies suggest that manipulation of the CRF system in the CeA can block this increased alcohol intake.