Light signaling in scotopic conditions in the rabbit, mouse and rat retina: a physiological and anatomical study

In the dark, light signals are conventionally routed through the following circuit: rods synapse onto rod bipolar (RB) cells, which in turn contact AII amacrine cells. AII cells segregate the light signal into the on and off pathways by making electrical synapses with on cone bipolar (CB) cells and glycinergic inhibitory chemical synapses with off CB cells. These bipolar cells synapse onto their respective ganglion cells, which transfer on and off signals to the visual centers of the brain. Two alternative pathways have recently been postulated for the signal transfer in scotopic conditions: 1) electrical coupling between rods and cones, and 2) a circuit independent of cone photoreceptors, implying direct contacts between rods and off CB cells. Anatomical evidence supports the existence of both these circuits. To investigate the contribution of these alternative pathways to scotopic vision in the mammalian retina, we have performed patch-clamp recordings from ganglion cells in the dark-adapted retina of the rabbit, mouse, and rat. Approximately one-half of the ganglion cells in the rabbit retina received off signals through a circuit that was independent of RB cells. This was shown by their persistence in the presence of the glutamate agonist 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (APB), which blocks rod-->RB cell signaling. Consistent with this result, strychnine, a glycine receptor antagonist, was unable to abolish these off responses. In addition, we were able to show that some off cone bipolar dendrites terminate at rod spherules and make potential contacts. In the mouse retina, however, there seems to be a very low proportion of off signals carried by an APB-resistant pathway. No ganglion cells in the rat retina displayed APB- and strychnine-resistant responses. Our data support signaling through flat contacts between rods and off CB cells as the alternative route, but suggest that the significance of this pathway differs between species.     

Presynaptic inhibition differentially shapes transmission in distinct circuits in the mouse retina

Diverse retinal outputs are mediated by ganglion cells that receive excitatory input from distinct classes of bipolar cells (BCs). These classes of BCs separate visual signals into rod, ON and OFF cone pathways. Although BC signalling is a major determinant of the ganglion cell-mediated retinal output, it is not fully understood how light-evoked, presynaptic inhibition from amacrine cell inputs shapes BC outputs. To determine whether differences in presynaptic inhibition uniquely modulate BC synaptic output to specific ganglion cells, we assessed the inhibitory contributions of GABA_A, GABA_C and glycine receptors across the BC pathways. Here we show that different proportions of GABA_A and GABA_C receptor-mediated inhibition determined the kinetics of GABAergic presynaptic inhibition across different BC classes. Large, slow GABA_C and small, fast GABA_A receptor-mediated inputs to rod BCs prolonged light-evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (L-IPSCs), while smaller GABA_C and larger GABA_A receptor-mediated contributions produced briefer L-IPSCs in ON and OFF cone BCs. Glycinergic inhibition also varied across BC class. In the rod-dominant conditions studied here, slow glycinergic inputs dominated L - IPSCs in OFF cone BCs, attributable to inputs from the rod pathway via AII amacrine cells, while rod and ON cone BCs received little and no glycinergic input, respectively. As these large glycinergic inputs come from rod signalling pathways, in cone-dominant conditions L-IPSCs in OFF cone bipolar cells will probably be dominated by GABA_A receptor-mediated input. Thus, unique presynaptic receptor combinations mediate distinct forms of inhibition to selectively modulate BC outputs, enhancing the distinctions among parallel retinal signals.     

Synaptic pathways that shape the excitatory drive in an OFF retinal ganglion cell

Different types of retinal ganglion cells represent distinct spatiotemporal filters that respond selectively to specific features in the visual input. Much about the circuitry and synaptic mechanisms that underlie such specificity remains to be determined. This study examines how N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor signaling combines with other excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms to shape the output of small-field OFF brisk-sustained ganglion cells (OFF-BSGCs) in the rabbit retina. We used voltage clamp to separately resolve NMDA, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA), and inhibitory inputs elicited by stimulation of the receptive field center. Three converging circuits were identified. First is a direct glutamatergic input, arising from OFF cone bipolar cells (CBCs), which is mediated by synaptic NMDA and AMPA receptors. The NMDA input was saturated at 10% contrast, whereas the AMPA input increased monotonically up to 60% contrast. We propose that NMDA inputs selectively enhance sensitivity to low contrasts. The OFF bipolar cells, mediating this direct excitatory input, express dendritic kainate (KA) receptors, which are resistant to the nonselective AMPA/KA receptor antagonist, 2,3-dioxo-6-nitro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[f]quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide disodium salt (NBQX), but are suppressed by a GluK1- and GluK3-selective antagonist, (S)-1-(2-amino-2-carboxyethyl)-3-(2-carboxy-thiophene-3-yl-methyl)-5-methylpyrimidine-2,4-dione (UBP-310). The second circuit entails glycinergic crossover inhibition, arising from ON-CBCs and mediated by AII amacrine cells, which modulate glutamate release from the OFF-CBC terminals. The third circuit also comprises glycinergic crossover inhibition, which is driven by the ON pathway; however, this inhibition impinges directly on the OFF-BSGCs and is mediated by an unknown glycinergic amacrine cell that expresses AMPA but not KA receptors.     

Transmitter‐specific input to OFF‐alpha ganglion cells in the cat retina

The synaptic input to OFF‐center alpha ganglion cells in the cat retina was analyzed by electron microscopic reconstruction to quantify the bipolar and amacrine cell input and to determine the neurotransmitter content of the presynaptic cells. Cone bipolar cells were found to comprise 11% of the total input with their dyad synapses distributed across the dendritic tree. The remaining contacts were conventional synapses indicative of amacrine cells; postembedding immunogold labeling was used to characterize these cells as either GABA‐ or glycine‐immunoreactive. Results showed the amacrine input to be equally divided between GABA and glycinergic contacts at each order of dendritic branching of the alpha cells. Among the GABA‐positive neurons were A19 amacrine cells, the processes of which are characterized by a dense array of neurotubules. A major source of glycinergic input was from lobular appendages of AII amacrine cells with lesser contributions from other glycine‐positive amacrine cells. The physiological role(s) of these amino acids must be interpreted in view of the multiple subpopulations of amacrine cells, which provide input to OFF‐alpha cells, and the diversity in receptors at their synapses. Anat Rec 255:363–373, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Simultaneous contribution of two rod pathways to AII amacrine and cone bipolar cell light responses

Rod signals traverse several synapses en route to cone bipolar cells. In one pathway, rods communicate directly with cones via gap junctions. In a second pathway, signals flow rods-rod bipolars-AII amacrines-cone bipolars. The relative contribution of each pathway to retinal function is not well understood. Here we have examined this question from the perspective of the AII amacrine. AIIs form bidirectional electrical synapses with on cone bipolars. Consequently, as on cone bipolars are activated by outer plexiform inputs, they too should contribute to the AII response. Rod bipolar inputs to AIIs were blocked by AMPA receptor antagonists, revealing a smaller, non-AMPA component of the light response. This small residual response did not reverse between -70 and +70 mV and was blocked by carbenoxolone, suggesting that the current arose in on cone bipolars and was transmitted to AIIs via gap junctions. The residual component was evident for stimuli 2 log units below cone threshold and was prolonged for bright stimuli, demonstrating that it was rod driven. Because the rod bipolar-AII pathway was blocked, the rod-driven residual current likely was generated via the rod-cone pathway activation of on cone bipolars. Thus for a large range of intensities, rod signals reach the inner retina by both rod bipolar-AII and rod-cone coupling pathways.     

Pharmacological modulation of the rod pathway in the cat retina

1. In the intact cat eye, the responses of ganglion cells to light stimulation were recorded extracellularly and the actions of iontophoretically applied 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate (APB), a potent agonist at ON-bipolars, and of strychnine, a glycine antagonist, were investigated. 2. Under light-adapted conditions, the activity of ON-center ganglion cells is decreased by APB but is increased by strychnine. APB and strychnine act independently of one another. 3. The activity of light-adapted OFF-center ganglion cells is increased by APB and by strychnine. The light response remains clearly modulated. Strychnine blocks the action of simultaneously applied APB. The results are in agreement with the action of a push-pull mechanism, according to which ON-cone-bipolars provide a glycinergic input into OFF-center ganglion cells. 4. Under dark-adapted conditions, APB blocks the light responses of both ON-center and OFF-center ganglion cells. The discharge rate of ON-center ganglion cells is completely suppressed; OFF-center ganglion cells show a high maintained discharge. 5. Strychnine blocks the scotopic light response of OFF-center ganglion cells and blocks the action of simultaneously applied APB. The light response of ON-center ganglion cells is hardly affected by strychnine. 6. The effects of strychnine on OFF-center ganglion cells are in agreement with the hypothesis that the glycinergic AII amacrine cells modulate the activity of the scotopic OFF-channel. 7. Intravitreally applied APB abolished the scotopic b-wave of the electroretinogram at concentrations of 100 microM. 8. Our data suggest that as in rabbit (10) the rod bipolars in cat retina are depolarizing (ON) bipolar cells.     

Mechanisms that limit the light stimulus frequency following through the dl-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid sensitive and insensitive rod Off-pathways

In the retina, rod signal pathways process scotopic visual information. Light decrements are mediated by two distinct groups of rod pathways in the dark-adapted retina that can be differentiated on the basis of their sensitivity to the glutamate agonist dl-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (APB). We have found that the APB sensitive and insensitive rod Off-pathways signal different light decrement information: the APB sensitive rod Off-pathway conveys slow and low frequency light signals, whereas the APB insensitive rod Off-pathways mediate fast and high frequency light signals [Wang GY (2006) Unique functional properties of the APB sensitive and insensitive rod pathways signaling light decrements in mouse retinal ganglion cells. Vis Neurosci 23:127–135]. However, the mechanisms which limit the frequency following through the APB sensitive and insensitive rod Off-pathways remain unknown. In the current study, whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made from ganglion cells in dark and light adapted mouse retina to identify the mechanisms that limit the frequency following through the APB sensitive and insensitive rod Off-pathways. The results showed that the sites from AII amacrine cells to Off cone bipolar cells are the major mechanisms that limit the frequency following through the APB sensitive rod Off-pathway. In the APB insensitive rod Off-pathways, rods themselves limited the frequency following through these pathways. Moreover, ganglion cells were able to follow higher frequencies under photopic conditions than under scotopic conditions. The Off responses followed lower frequencies than On responses under photopic conditions. This finding was observed in cells that yielded On or Off responses only as well as in On–Off cells.     

The effects of light-adaptation on rod and cone receptive field organization of monkey ganglion cells

1. Receptive fields of perifoveal ganglion cells have been measured by determining threshold for eliciting a just detectable response using either concentric spot stimuli centred on the receptive field or small spot stimuli in different parts of the receptive field at various states of retinal adaptation and with stimuli selected to separate rod from cone function.2. Light-adaptation decreases the sensitivity, latency and duration of threshold responses throughout the receptive field of a ganglion cell.3. With all patterns of retinal stimulation and states of adaptation, threshold signals of the rods reach a ganglion cell later and those of the cones earlier than approximately 50 msec after a light stimulus.4. In the more dark-adapted retina threshold rod and cone signals can be transmitted to the brain by the same or by neighbouring ganglion cells but not simultaneously; in the light-adapted state only the cone signal is transmitted.     

GABA blockade unmasks an OFF response in ON direction selective ganglion cells in the mammalian retina

One unique subtype of retinal ganglion cell is the direction selective (DS) cell, which responds vigorously to stimulus movement in a preferred direction, but weakly to movement in the opposite or null direction. Here we show that the application of the GABA receptor blocker picrotoxin unmasks a robust excitatory OFF response in ON DS ganglion cells. Similar to the characteristic ON response of ON DS cells, the masked OFF response is also direction selective, but its preferred direction is opposite to that of the ON component. Given that the OFF response is unmasked with picrotoxin, its direction selectivity cannot be generated by a GABAergic mechanism. Alternatively, we find that the direction selectivity of the OFF response is blocked by cholinergic drugs, suggesting that acetylcholine release from presynaptic starburst amacrine cells is crucial for its generation. Finally, we find that the OFF response is abolished by application of a gap junction blocker, suggesting that it arises from electrical synapses between ON DS and polyaxonal amacrine cells. Our results suggest a novel role for gap junctions in mixing excitatory ON and OFF signals at the ganglion cell level. We propose that OFF inputs to ON DS cells are normally masked by a GABAergic inhibition, but are unmasked under certain stimulus conditions to mediate optokinetic signals in the brain.     

The inner plexiform layer in the retina of the cat: electron microscopic observations

Summary Neural connections of cells ramifying in the inner plexiform layer of the cat retina have been studied by serial section electron microscopy. Flat cone bipolars and invaginating cone bipolars segregate their axon terminals to different sublaminae of the IPL (sublaminaa and sublaminab, respectively) where they relate to different subtypes of the same class of ganglion cell (a andb types respectively).Rod bipolar axon terminals end solely in sublaminab and synapse with amacrine cells (AI and AII). AI provides reciprocal synapses to clusters of rod bipolar axon terminals. The AII amacrine provides rod input toa type ganglion cells by means of chemical synapses and tob type ganglion cells through gap junctions with invaginating cone bipolar terminals.Amacrine cells exist which interconnect rod and cone bipolars, but some amacrines appear to be related specifically to neurons branching in particular sublaminae. Both large- and small-bodied ganglion cells have amacrine-dominated input while the medium-bodied ganglion cells with small dendritic trees have cone bipolar-dominated input.     

GABAA, GABAC and glycine receptor-mediated inhibition differentially affects light-evoked signalling from mouse retinal rod bipolar cells

Rod bipolar cells relay visual signals evoked by dim illumination from the outer to the inner retina. GABAergic and glycinergic amacrine cells contact rod bipolar cell terminals, where they modulate transmitter release and contribute to the receptive field properties of third order neurones. However, it is not known how these distinct inhibitory inputs affect rod bipolar cell output and subsequent retinal processing. To determine whether GABA_A, GABA_C and glycine receptors made different contributions to light-evoked inhibition, we recorded light-evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (L-IPSCs) from rod bipolar cells mediated by each pharmacologically isolated receptor. All three receptors contributed to L-IPSCs, but their relative roles differed; GABA_C receptors transferred significantly more charge than GABA_A and glycine receptors. We determined how these distinct inhibitory inputs affected rod bipolar cell output by recording light-evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (L-EPSCs) from postsynaptic AII and A17 amacrine cells. Consistent with their relative contributions to L-IPSCs, GABA_C receptor activation most effectively reduced the L-EPSCs, while glycine and GABA_A receptor activation reduced the L-EPSCs to a lesser extent. We also found that GABAergic L-IPSCs in rod bipolar cells were limited by GABA_A receptor-mediated inhibition between amacrine cells. We show that GABA_A, GABA_C and glycine receptors mediate functionally distinct inhibition to rod bipolar cells, which differentially modulated light-evoked rod bipolar cell output. Our findings suggest that modulating the relative proportions of these inhibitory inputs could change the characteristics of rod bipolar cell output.     

Transmitter-specific input to OFF-alpha ganglion cells in the cat retina.

The synaptic input to OFF-center alpha ganglion cells in the cat retina was analyzed by electron microscopic reconstruction to quantify the bipolar and amacrine cell input and to determine the neurotransmitter content of the presynaptic cells. Cone bipolar cells were found to comprise 11% of the total input with their dyad synapses distributed across the dendritic tree. The remaining contacts were conventional synapses indicative of amacrine cells; postembedding immunogold labeling was used to characterize these cells as either GABA- or glycine-immunoreactive. Results showed the amacrine input to be equally divided between GABA and glycinergic contacts at each order of dendritic branching of the alpha cells. Among the GABA-positive neurons were A19 amacrine cells, the processes of which are characterized by a dense array of neurotubules. A major source of glycinergic input was from lobular appendages of AII amacrine cells with lesser contributions from other glycine-positive amacrine cells. The physiological role(s) of these amino acids must be interpreted in view of the multiple subpopulations of amacrine cells, which provide input to OFF-alpha cells, and the diversity in receptors at their synapses.     

Expression of the neurokinin 1 receptor in the rabbit retina

Substance P is the preferred ligand for the neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor. In vertebrate retinas, substance P is expressed by amacrine, interplexiform and ganglion cells. Substance P influences the activity of amacrine and ganglion cells and it is reported to evoke dopamine release. We investigated NK1 receptor expression in the rabbit retina using affinity-purified NK1 receptor antibodies. NK1 receptors were expressed by two distinct populations of retinal neurons. One is a population of ON-type bipolar cells characterized by axonal arborizations that ramified in the inner plexiform layer near the ganglion cell layer. Double-label studies showed that NK1 receptor-expressing bipolar cells were distinct from rod bipolar cells and from other immunocytochemically identified types of cone bipolar cells. Their density was about 2250 cells/mm2 in the visual streak and 1115 cells/mm2 in ventral mid-periphery. They were distributed in a non-random pattern. In the outer plexiform layer, the dendrites of these bipolar cells converged into heavily immunostained clusters having a punctate appearance. The density of these clusters in mid-peripheral ventral regions (about 13000 clusters/mm2) was similar to the reported cone density [Famiglietti and Sharpe (1995) Vis. Neurosci. 12, 1151-1175], suggesting these dendrites contact all cone photoreceptors. The second NK1 receptor expressing cell population corresponds to the tyrosine hydroxylase-containing amacrine cell population. NK1 receptor immunostaining was localized to the cell body and processes, but not to the processes that form the 'rings' that are known to encircle somata of AII amacrine cells. These findings show that NK1 receptor immunoreactivity is localized to a population of ON-type cone bipolar cells and to dopaminergic amacrine cells, suggesting that substance P acting on NK1 receptors influences multiple retinal circuits in the rabbit retina.     

Characterization of receptors for glutamate and GABA in retinal neurons

Glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) are major excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters in the vertebrate retina, "a genuine neural center" (Ramón y Cajal, 1964, Recollections of My Life, C.E. Horne (Translater) MIT Press, Cambridge, MA). Photoreceptors, generating visual signals, and bipolar cells, mediating signal transfer from photoreceptors to ganglion cells, both release glutamate, which induces and/or changes the activity of the post-synaptic neurons (horizontal and bipolar cells for photoreceptors; amacrine and ganglion cells for bipolar cells). Horizontal and amacrine cells, which mediate lateral interaction in the outer and inner retina respectively, use GABA as a principal neurotransmitter. In recent years, glutamate receptors and GABA receptors in the retina have been extensively studied, using multi-disciplinary approaches. In this article some important advances in this field are reviewed, with special reference to retinal information processing. Photoreceptors possess metabotropic glutamate receptors and several subtypes of GABA receptors. Most horizontal cells express AMPA receptors, which may be predominantly assembled from flop slice variants. In addition, these cells also express GABAA and GABAC receptors. Signal transfer from photoreceptors to bipolar cells is rather complicated. Whereas AMPA/KA receptors mediate transmission for OFF type bipolar cells, several subtypes of glutamate receptors, both ionotropic and metabotropic, are involved in the generation of light responses of ON type bipolar cells. GABAA and GABAC receptors with distinct kinetics are differentially expressed on dendrites and axon terminals of both ON and OFF bipolar cells, mediating inhibition from horizontal cells and amacrine cells. Amacrine cells possess ionotropic glutamate receptors, whereas ganglion cells express both ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors. GABAA receptors exist in amacrine and ganglion cells. Physiological data further suggest that GABAC receptors may be involved in the activity of these neurons. Moreover, responses of these retinal third order neurons are modulated by GABAB receptors, and in ganglion cells there exist several subtypes of GABAB receptors. A variety of glutamate receptor and GABA receptor subtypes found in the retina perform distinct functions, thus providing a wide range of neural integration and versatility of synaptic transmission. Perspectives in this research field are presented.     

视觉信息在视网膜中传递和调控

视觉信息在视网膜中传递和调控杨雄里（中国科学院，上海生理研究所，上海生命科学联合开放实验室，上海２００３１）光感受器（视杆和视锥）信号在视网膜中是通过各种信息通道（ｃｈａｎｎｅｌ）进行传递的。这些通道包括：视杆一视锥通道，颜色信号通道，给光一撤光（Ｏ...     

Neuronal expression of P2X3 purinoceptors in the rat retina

P2X3 purinoceptors are involved in fast, excitatory neurotransmission in the nervous system, and are expressed predominantly within sensory neurons. In this study, we examined the cellular and synaptic localization of the P2X3 receptor subunit in the retina of the rat using immunofluorescence immunohistochemistry and pre-embedding immunoelectron microscopy. In addition, we investigated the activity of ecto-ATPases in the inner retina using an enzyme cytochemical method. The P2X3 receptor subunit was expressed in the soma of a subset of GABA immunoreactive amacrine cells, some of which also expressed protein kinase C-alpha. In addition, punctate immunoreactivity was observed within both the inner and outer plexiform layers of the retina. Double labeling studies showed that P2X3 receptor puncta were associated with both rod and cone bipolar cell axon terminals in the inner plexiform layer. Ultrastructural studies indicated that P2X3 receptor subunits were expressed on putative A17 amacrine cells at sites of reciprocal synaptic input to the rod bipolar cell axon terminal. Moreover, we observed P2X3 immunolabeling on amacrine cell processes that were associated with cone bipolar cell axon terminals and other conventional synapses. In the outer retina, P2X3 immunoreactivity was observed on specialized junctions made by putative interplexiform cells. Ecto-ATPase activity was localized to the inner plexiform layer on the extracellular side of all plasma membranes, but was not apparent in the ganglion cell layer or the inner nuclear layer, suggesting that ATP dephosphorylation occurs exclusively in synaptic regions of the inner retina. These data provide further evidence that purines participate in retinal transmission, particularly within the rod pathway.     

Rod and cone interaction in dark-adapted monkey ganglion cells

1. Rod-cone interaction has been studied by analysing the response latency of large ganglion cells in the perifovea of dark-adapted Rhesus monkey retina.2. Both rod and cone signals have been found to converge on such cells. The cone system is less sensitive but much faster than that of the rods so that the cones determine latency whenever stimuli become suprathreshold for them. Responses to dimmer stimuli are determined entirely by the rods.3. The earliest signals to excite the ganglion cell leave a transitory refractoriness in their wake. Therefore when both rods and cones are stimulated simultaneously, the earlier cone signal, arriving at the ganglion cell, has a greater chance of producing excitation than the later rod signals.     

Functional properties of spontaneous IPSCs and glycine receptors in rod amacrine (AII) cells in the rat retina

AII amacrine cells play a crucial role in retinal signal transmission under scotopic conditions. We have used rat retinal slices to investigate the functional properties of inhibitory glycine receptors on AII cells by recording spontaneous IPSCs (spIPSCs) in whole cells and glycine-evoked responses in outside-out patches. Glycinergic spIPSCs displayed fast kinetics with an average 10–90% rise time of ∼500 μs, and a decay phase best fitted by a double-exponential function with τ_fast∼ 4.8 ms (97.5% amplitude contribution) and τ_slow∼ 33 ms. Decay kinetics were voltage dependent. Ultrafast application of brief (∼2–5 ms) pulses of glycine (3 m m ) to patches, evoked responses with fast deactivation kinetics best fitted with a double-exponential function with τ_fast∼ 4.6 ms (85% amplitude contribution) and τ_slow∼ 17 ms. Double-pulse experiments indicated recovery from desensitization after a 100-ms pulse of glycine with a double-exponential time course  (τ_fast∼ 71 ms and τ_slow∼ 1713 ms)  . Non-stationary noise analysis of spIPSCs and patch responses, and directly observed channel gating yielded similar single-channel conductances (∼41 to ∼47 pS). In addition, single-channel gating occurred at ∼83 pS. These results suggest that the fast glycinergic spIPSCs in AII cells are probably mediated by α1β heteromeric receptors with a contribution from α1 homomeric receptors. We hypothesize that glycinergic synaptic input may target the arboreal dendrites of AII cells, and could serve to shunt excitatory input from rod bipolar cells and transiently uncouple the transcellular current through electrical synapses between AII cells and between AII cells and ON-cone bipolar cells.     

Light-evoked responses of bipolar cells in a mammalian retina

We recorded light-evoked responses from rod and cone bipolar cells using patch-clamp techniques in a slice preparation of the rat retina. Rod bipolar cells responded to light with a sustained depolarization (ON response) followed at light offset by a slight hyperpolarization. ON and OFF cone bipolar cells were encountered, both with diverse temporal properties. The responses of rod bipolar cells were composed primarily of two components, a nonspecific cation current and a chloride current. The chloride current was reduced greatly in axotomized cells and could be suppressed by coapplication of the GABA(A) antagonist bicuculline and the GABA(C) antagonist (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid. This suggests that it largely reflects feedback from GABAergic amacrine cells. The response latency of intact rod bipolar cells was shorter than that of the axotomized cells, and the sensitivity curve covered more than twice the dynamic range. Application of the GABA receptor antagonists partially mimicked the effects of axotomy. These findings suggest that functional properties of the axon terminal system-notably synaptic feedback from amacrine cells-play an important role in defining the response properties of mammalian bipolar cells.