Platelet and soluble glycoprotein VI - novel applications in diagnosis and therapy

One of the key receptors involved in the prothrombotic stage of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is platelet glycoprotein VI (GPVI). This constitutively expressed collagen receptor is platelet-specific and has shown to be a useful biomarker tool for the early detection of atheroslerotic diseases such as ACS and ischemic stroke. In a multimarker panel of several biomarkers, platelet GPVI may contribute to risk stratification and prediction of clinical outcome in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic diseases. Moreover, the soluble receptor of GPVI may also be an interesting and prospective target for molecular imaging to identify sites of vulnerable plaques as the results of preclinical studies suggest. Apart from the diagnostic use of platelet as well as soluble, plasmatic GPVI, therapeutical implications may be the blockade of collagen binding sides of GPVI, as platelet GPVI is not able to bind to collagen where the binding sides were already saturated with soluble GPVI. This therapeutic aspect could serve as a promising strategy for antithrombotic and antiatherosclerotic therapy in future.     

Clopidogrel and aspirin in cardiovascular medicine: responders or not--current best available evidence

Dual antiplatelet therapy represents an important advance for patients with established coronary artery disease. It is an important strategy for patients with acute coronary syndromes and those undergoing percutaneous transcatheter coronary interventions. Clopidogrel effectively inhibits ADP-induced platelet activation and aggregation by selectively and irreversibly blocking the P2Y(12) receptor on the platelet membrane. Aspirin works by irreversibly acetylating the cyclooxygenase (COX-1) enzyme, thus suppressing the production of thromboxane A(2) (TxA(2)) and inhibiting platelet activation and aggregation. Variable platelet response and potential resistance to therapy has emerged with aspirin and clopidogrel. The definitions of antiplatelet agents variability in responsiveness and nonresponsiveness are discussed. Clopidogrel and aspirin responsiveness as they are measured in the laboratory by various techniques (platelet aggregometry and point-of-care assays such as platelet function analyzer [PFA-100] and rapid platelet function assay [RPFA]) are evaluated. The mechanisms responsible for variations in responsiveness to antiplatelet agents such as clinical, cellular and genetic factors are defined. Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance are emerging clinical entities with potentially severe consequences such as myocardial infarction, stroke or death. The therapeutic interventions to deal with nonresponsiveness are reported, although specific recommendations are not clearly established. In the future, routine measurement of platelet function in patients with cardiovascular disease may become the standard of care. Personalized antithrombotic treatment strategies may be determined by ex-vivo measurements that identify critical pathways influencing thrombotic risk in the individual patient.     

Recent advances in antiplatelet agents

Platelet aggregation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of thromboembolic diseases such as myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina and peripheral artery disease. Until recently, aspirin was the only antiplatelet agent available to prevent or treat these events. Over the past several years, there has been a substantial expansion in the antiplatelet armamentarium as well as in the understanding of the clinical importance of antiplatelet therapy in limiting the complications of thrombosis. Aspirin was one of the first agents to be adopted and it remains as the standard therapy with the higher amount of available clinical information. Following aspirin, ADP receptor antagonists like ticlopidine and clopidogrel as well as phosphodiesterase inhibitors dipyridamole and cilostazol have been introduced. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists like eptifibatide, tirofiban and abciximab are the newer antiplatelet agents which act at the end of the common pathway of platelet aggregation. Although results of clinical studies with the first oral GPIIb/IIIa antagonists were disappointing, agents of the new generation might expand the potential application of GPIIb/IIIa targeted therapy. This review will highlight recent advances in the development of aspirin, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, ADP receptor antagonists and the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The emphasis of this paper has been placed on the chemical aspects of these agents.     

Phosphotyrosine signaling in platelets: lessons for vascular thrombosis

Platelet activation is crucial for normal hemostasis to arrest bleeding following vascular injury. However, excessive platelet activation in narrowed atherosclerotic blood vessels that are subject to high shear forces may initiate the onset of arterial thrombosis. When platelets come into contact with, and adhere to collagen exposed by damaged endothelium, they undergo morphological and functional changes necessary to generate a platelet-rich thrombus. This process is complex and involves precise co-ordination of various signaling pathways which lead to firm platelet adhesion to sites of tissue damage, release of granule contents from activated platelets, platelet shape change, platelet aggregation and subsequent thrombus formation and consolidation. Induction of tyrosine phosphorylation of key signaling molecules has emerged as a critical event central to stimulatory signaling pathways that generate platelet activation, but is an essential component associated with regulatory pathways that limit the extent of platelet activation. Understanding mechanisms that regulate platelet activation may contribute to the development of novel therapeutics that control common vascular diseases such as myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke.     

Clopidogrel: a selective inhibitor of platelet ADP receptors

Platelets play a key role in the development of ischemic complications in the arterial circulation. Antiplatelet therapy has proven effective in the treatment and prevention of ischemic events. Numerous clinical studies have confirmed the therapeutic efficacy of aspirin to such a point that this antiplatelet agent has become the gold standard in clinical practice. Clopidogrel is a thienopyridine compound that inhibits platelet aggregation by selectively binding to adenylate cyclase-coupled ADP receptors. Results of a large, double-blind, randomized study (CAPRIE) confirm that administration of clopidogrel to patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease is more effective than aspirin in reducing the combined risk of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death. The present article highlights the importance of activation of platelets through ADP receptors and reviews the pharmacology and clinical studies of clopidogrel, a selective inhibitor of these mechanisms.     

Novel mechanistic concept of platelet inhibition

Background: Activation of circulating platelets by exposed vessel wall collagen is a primary step in the pathogenesis of thrombotic diseases such as heart attack and stroke. Drugs that are capable of blocking platelet activation successfully reduce cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. However, despite intensive research efforts in antithrombotic drug discovery and development, uncontrolled hemorrhage still remains the most common side effect associated with antithrombotic drugs that are currently in use. Objective: The selective inhibition of glycoprotein VI (GPVI), the central platelet collagen receptor, and/or its signaling may inhibit thrombosis without affecting hemostatic plug formation. However, the mechanism of GPVI signaling is not known, hindering the further development of this promising antithrombotic strategy. Methods: This review focuses on an innovative mechanistic concept of platelet inhibition. Results/conclusion: A novel model of GPVI signaling, the signaling chain homooligomerization (SCHOOL) model, has revealed new therapeutic targets for GPVI inhibition, resulting in the development of novel antithrombotic pharmacological approaches and the invention of new platelet inhibitors.     

Dual antiplatelet therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic events.

The advantages of dual antiplatelet therapy over monotherapy in preventing recurrent ischemic events are examined. Atherosclerosis is an insidious systemic process involving multiple vascular beds, including the cerebral, coronary, and peripheral arteries. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture is one of the inciting events in the progression of platelet activation, aggregation, and thrombus formation. Patients with any clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis are vulnerable to others in different vascular beds since the disease develops throughout the vasculature, and different vascular events have common predisposing risk factors. Ischemic coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease are two of the three most frequent causes of death in the United States. The efficacy of aspirin in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke has been demonstrated in numerous trials. While dipyridamole has not been linked with a greater odds reduction than aspirin in the development of MI, stroke, and vascular death, ticlopidine and clopidogrel have been associated with a greater reduction in the development of acute MI, stroke, and vascular death than aspirin. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events are ongoing. The rationale for using a combination of two mechanistically different antiplatelet agents is supported by ex vivo and clinical studies. Inhibition of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation is enhanced with dual antiplatelet therapy. Combination antiplatelet regimens with different mechanisms of action to inhibit multiple sites in the thrombotic pathway may further improve long-term clinical outcomes. Dual antiplatelet therapy may have advantages over monotherapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events.     

New antiplatelet drugs

Many clinical trials and pathologic analyses have clearly demonstrated a central role for platelets in the pathophysiology of major cardiovascular disorders, including unstable angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction (MI), transient ischaemia, and stroke following thrombolytic therapy [1,2]. A meta-analysis of 25 randomised trials of various antiplatelet agents that included 29,000 patients revealed a highly significant decrease in non-fatal MI, stroke, total cardiovascular death, and overall mortality in patients treated with antiplatelet agents compared with placebo [3]. These data have triggered intense efforts over the past 10 years in studying the role of the platelet in cardiovascular disorders, and in developing more potent and selective antiplatelet agents. This discussion summarises recent advances in the development and evaluation of these newer agents with particular emphasis on antagonists of the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor, since this protein plays a key role in the final common pathway of platelet aggregation.     

Triple antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes

Heightened platelet activity plays a critical role in thrombus formation, which is central to acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE)-ACS (comprising unstable angina pectoris and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]) and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and has been implicated in poor clinical outcome. Platelets not only impact coronary thrombus but are major contributors to microcirculatory dysfunction and vascular inflammation. Efforts to inhibit platelet function, including antiplatelet therapy, are paramount to the management of ACS; thus, a growing recognition of the various pathways driving platelet activity has given rise to the need for multiple agents that impart complimentary mechanisms of action. While only inhibiting platelet activation will still allow for aggregation, i.e. the binding of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptors to fibrinogen, solely blocking aggregation may leave platelet-activating pathways free to sustain the production and release of various pro-inflammatory and pro-thrombotic compounds. The benefit of 'triple antiplatelet therapy', referring to the combination of aspirin, a thienopyridine or non-thienopyridine adenosine diphosphate (ADP)/P2Y12 receptor blocker and a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI), has been demonstrated in patients with NSTE-ACS who ultimately undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are determined to be at an elevated risk for ischaemic events, and in patients undergoing primary PCI. It is therefore recommended by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. Furthermore, the rationale for adding a GPI, particularly in patients with STEMI, is backed by studies that have shown negligible effects of a 600?mg clopidogrel loading dose, despite being administered 4 hours prior to PCI. Moreover, it has been observed that the physiological state of STEMI may deem dual antiplatelet therapy ineffective, because during an acute event the absorption of clopidogrel may be impaired. Nonetheless, there is still considerable variability with respect to the use of triple antiplatelet therapy such as that documented in the Euro Heart Survey. The perception that the mortality benefit afforded by adding a GPI to dual oral antiplatelet therapy does not outweigh the risk is a likely factor. This may be fuelled by results of trials such as BRAVE-3, which, inconsistent with those for On-TIME 2, failed to prove the value of adding a GPI to dual oral antiplatelet therapy in patients with STEMI. Subsequent analyses have indeed demonstrated the positive benefit-risk ratio associated with adding a GPI and determined that the timing of GPI administration could have an impact on clinical outcome related to its impact on infarct size in patients with STEMI. Additionally, it has been presumed that a synergistic effect exists between P2Y12 inhibitors and GPIs. Triple antiplatelet therapy has a significant role to play in the management of patients with ACS managed with PCI. An understanding of patient risk status and timing of symptoms and bleeding risk is crucial to patient selection and ensuring that this therapy is optimized. Though no interaction has been noted in trials of newer, more potent antiplatelet agents, future studies are key to determining the role of this strategy in the era of these more potent agents.     

延长双重抗血小板治疗对心肌梗死后高危稳定性冠心病患者预后的影响

目的 探讨延长双重抗血小板治疗对心肌梗死后高危稳定性冠心病患者预后的影响.方法 选取2013年6月至2014年8月本院收治的心肌梗死后高危稳定性冠心病患者84例为研究对象,采用随机数表法分为观察组和对照组,各42例,对照组实施短期(12个月)双重抗血小板治疗,观察组采用长期(24个月)双重抗血小板治疗.比较两组治疗结束时血脂复常率、左室射血分数正常率、血小板聚集率,评价疗效;同时记录两组复合终点事件(心血管死亡、心肌梗死、脑卒中)发生率及消化道出血发生率.结果 观察组血脂复常率为90.5％、左室射血分数正常率为88.1％,显著高于对照组的71.4％、69.0％(P＜0.05),观察组血小板聚集率为4.8％,明显低于对照组的23.8％(P＜0.05);观察组消化道出血率为19.0％,与对照组的14.3％比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);观察组复合终点事件发生率为21.4％,与对照组的7.1％比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 在心肌梗死后高危稳定性冠心病患者抗血小板治疗中,长期双重抗血小板治疗可有效改善血脂水平、左室射血分数及血小板聚集率,且长期治疗后消化道出血、复合终点事件发生率与短期双重抗血小板治疗无显著差异,因此延长双重抗血小板治疗的方案值得临床应用.     

Combining antiplatelet and thrombolytic therapies for stroke

Pharmacological therapy for acute nonhaemorrhagic stroke has become a reality over the last 5 years. Mechanistically, both thrombolytic (tissue plasminogen activator and urokinase) and antiplatelet (aspirin) monotherapy have demonstrated efficacy. However, unintended actions limit the extent of clinical improvement in each circumstance. For example, in addition to excess bleeding, tissue plasminogen activator therapy has been associated with complement activation, neuronal toxicity and laminin degradation, while aspirin may reduce nitric oxide synthase activity and cerebral blood flow. Attention is now directed toward improving the therapeutic index for each class of agents. Generally, while thrombolytic therapy is focused on developing agents with greater fibrin specificity and safety (that is, a reduction in intracranial haemorrhage rate), the development of antiplatelet agents is primarily focused on achieving greater potency. The latter is being investigated by combining agents with different mechanisms (aspirin and dipyridamole, aspirin and clopidogrel) as well as agents designed to block the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, the final common pathway for platelet aggregation. Thus, combination therapy using both thrombolytic and antiplatelet agents will further attempt to improve the therapeutic index by increasing potency and improving the safety profile. Anecdotal case studies support the merits of this approach and are consistent with the data reported for myocardial ischaemia and interventional strategies. It is anticipated that drug therapy directed at both thrombolytic and antiplatelet targets will ultimately result in a widened therapeutic window that will allow acute stroke therapy to be administrated to a much greater number of patients than is currently possible.     

Inhibition of platelet adhesion to collagen as a new target for antithrombotic drugs

Platelet adhesion to a damaged blood vessel is the initial trigger for arterial hemostasis and thrombosis. Platelets adhere to the subendothelium through an interaction with von Willebrand factor (VWF), which forms a bridge between collagen within the damaged vessel wall and the platelet receptor glycoprotein Ib/V/IX (GPIb), an interaction especially important under high shear conditions[1]. This reversible adhesion allows platelets to roll over the damaged area, which is then followed by a firm adhesion mediated by the collagen receptors (alpha(2)beta(1), GPVI, ) in addition[2] resulting in platelet activation. This leads to the conformational activation of the platelet alpha(IIb)beta3 receptor, fibrinogen binding and finally to platelet aggregation. Over the past decades, modulation of platelet function has been a strategy for the control of cardiovascular disease. Lately, drugs have been developed that target the fibrinogen receptor alphaIIbbeta3 or the ADP receptor and many of these promising compounds have been tested in clinical trials. However the development of products that interfere with the first step of hemostasis, i.e. the platelet adhesion, has lagged behind. In this review we want to discuss (i) the in vivo studies that were performed with compounds that target proteins involved in different adhesion steps i.e. the VWF-GPIb-axis, the collagen-VWF axis and the collagen-collagen receptor axis and (ii) the possible advantages these putative new drugs could have over the current antiplatelet agents.     

Combining antiplatelet and thrombolytic therapies for stroke

Pharmacological therapy for acute nonhaemorrhagic stroke has become a reality over the last 5 years. Mechanistically, both thrombolytic (tissue plasminogen activator and urokinase) and antiplatelet (aspirin) monotherapy have demonstrated efficacy. However, unintended actions limit the extent of clinical improvement in each circumstance. For example, in addition to excess bleeding, tissue plasminogen activator therapy has been associated with complement activation, neuronal toxicity and laminin degradation, while aspirin may reduce nitric oxide synthase activity and cerebral blood flow. Attention is now directed toward improving the therapeutic index for each class of agents. Generally, while thrombolytic therapy is focused on developing agents with greater fibrin specificity and safety (that is, a reduction in intracranial haemorrhage rate), the development of antiplatelet agents is primarily focused on achieving greater potency. The latter is being investigated by combining agents with different mechanisms (aspirin and dipyridamole, aspirin and clopidogrel) as well as agents designed to block the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, the final common pathway for platelet aggregation. Thus, combination therapy using both thrombolytic and antiplatelet agents will further attempt to improve the therapeutic index by increasing potency and improving the safety profile. Anecdotal case studies support the merits of this approach and are consistent with the data reported for myocardial ischaemia and interventional strategies. It is anticipated that drug therapy directed at both thrombolytic and antiplatelet targets will ultimately result in a widened therapeutic window that will allow acute stroke therapy to be administrated to a much greater number of patients than is currently possible.     

Genetic and non-genetic factors affecting the response to clopidogrel therapy

INTRODUCTION: Clopidogrel (CLP) is a second-generation thienopyridine that prevents platelet aggregation by inhibiting the adenosine diphosphate receptor located on the platelet surface. The use of CLP in combination with aspirin has become standard treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes and stent implantation. Data suggests that a significant percentage of individuals treated with CLP do not receive the expected therapeutic benefit because of a decreased platelet inhibition. The clinical consequences of an inadequate platelet response are cardiovascular complications, which can lead to acute myocardial infarction, stroke and death. The mechanism underlying CLP resistance is multifactorial and includes genetic polymorphisms and non-genetic causes (such as drug-drug interactions, co-morbidities, age). AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the so-far accumulated evidence on the role of genetic polymorphisms and non-genetic factors, as determinants of the antiplatelet response to CLP. Pharmacodynamic and clinical aspects of the CLP nonresponsiveness are also presented. Relevant papers were identified by an extensive PubMed search using appropriate keywords. EXPERT OPINION: Impaired platelet inhibition in CLP poor responders is a real problem, as it leads to serious clinical consequences. Therefore, prediction models that include pharmacogenetic knowledge and non-genetic risk factors of low response to the drug are needed in the individualization of antithrombotic therapy. Alternative antiplatelet strategies that should be considered to overcome this problem include dose modification, adjunctive antiplatelet drug usage, and use of newer agents.     

Mechanisms of platelet activation in acute coronary syndromes

Platelets are known to play a fundamental role in acute coronary syndromes. After atherosclerotic plaque rupture, platelets can form pathogenic, occlusive thrombi leading to acute ischemic events. Today there are promising results from recently developed antiplatelet agents. However, morbidity and mortality from acute coronary syndromes remain significant despite the administration of combination therapies (aspirin, thienopyridines). Sharing similar mechanisms, platelets may also form a thin monolayer in areas of damaged endothelium contributing to primary hemostasis. For this reason, administration of antiplatelet drugs is often associated with increased bleeding risk. As a result, currently available antiplatelet therapy cannot be characterized as optimal. The precise mechanisms of platelet activation in acute coronary syndromes are still under investigation. The study of basic mechanisms of platelet adhesion, activation and aggregation after atherosclerotic plaque rupture may help to define new targets for their inhibition. In the future, newer antiplatelet agents may offer more comprehensive platelet inhibition without interfering with primary hemostasis, thus offering greater protection with lower hemorrhagic risk.     

Advances in antiplatelet therapy

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the western world. These disorders share a common pathophysiology – atherosclerosis, which affects various arterial beds, leading to protean manifestations (coronary artery disease [CAD], stroke, peripheral arterial disease [PAD]). The platelet plays a pivotal role in the perpetuation and clinical expression of these disorders. The platelet, once believed to have a role confined to modulation of thrombosis and haemostasis, also plays an active role in vascular inflammation. Antiplatelet agents have become first-line therapy for CVD, and their unequivocal benefits are demonstrated in various basic and experimental models and supported by overwhelming evidence from clinical trials. Search is underway for more effective and safer antiplatelet therapy. Novel therapies are emerging to target the redundant pathways of platelet adhesion, activation and aggregation. Efforts are also ongoing to enhance implementation of existent therapy, target therapy selectively to high-risk patients and to those likely to respond (pharmacogenomics), and study the incremental benefits and safety of various antiplatelet combinations and their interaction with other medications in patients with CVD treated with polypharmacy.     

Advances in antiplatelet therapy

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the western world. These disorders share a common pathophysiology -- atherosclerosis, which affects various arterial beds, leading to protean manifestations (coronary artery disease [CAD], stroke, peripheral arterial disease [PAD]). The platelet plays a pivotal role in the perpetuation and clinical expression of these disorders. The platelet, once believed to have a role confined to modulation of thrombosis and haemostasis, also plays an active role in vascular inflammation. Antiplatelet agents have become first-line therapy for CVD, and their unequivocal benefits are demonstrated in various basic and experimental models and supported by overwhelming evidence from clinical trials. Search is underway for more effective and safer antiplatelet therapy. Novel therapies are emerging to target the redundant pathways of platelet adhesion, activation and aggregation. Efforts are also ongoing to enhance implementation of existent therapy, target therapy selectively to high-risk patients and to those likely to respond (pharmacogenomics), and study the incremental benefits and safety of various antiplatelet combinations and their interaction with other medications in patients with CVD treated with polypharmacy.     

The role of the cytochrome P450 polymorphisms in clopidogrel efficacy and clinical utility

Clopidogrel, an antiplatelet agent, prevents platelet aggregation by inhibiting the adenosine disphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 receptor, which is located on the platelet surface. Although dual antiplatelet therapy appears to be efficient, a considerable number of patients continue to experience adverse cardiovascular events, such as stent thrombosis. The percentage of low response to antiplatelet therapy varies from 4% to 30% of patients depending on the cut-off values. In addition, several factors such as poor absorption, drug-to-drug interactions, inadequate dosing, elevated body mass index, insulin resistance and the nature of acute coronary syndromes have been implicated in low clopidogrel response. Recently, studies have focused on the role of genetic polymorphisms encoding enzymes that participate in clopidogrel hepatic metabolism or receptors involved in intestinal absorption and ADP induced platelet aggregation, which may affect the percentage of platelet inhibition after clopidogrel administration. The management of clopidogrel resistance remains a controversial issue and additional studies are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of increased loading of clopidogrel or replacement with other new antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel.     

New perspectives in antiplatelet therapy

Platelet activation is a complex mechanism of response to vascular injury and atherothrombotic disease, leading to thrombus formation. A wide variety of surface receptors -integrins, leucine-rich family receptors, G protein coupled receptors, tyrosine kinase receptors- and intraplatelet molecules support and regulate platelet activation. They are potential targets of antiplatelet therapy for the prevention and treatment of arterial thrombosis. Despite the overall clinical benefit of established antiplatelet drugs targeting cyclooxigenase-1 (COX-1), glycoprotein integrin αIIbβ3, and the purinergic P2Y(12) receptor of adenosine diphosphate, a significant proportion of treated patients continue to experience recurrent ischaemic events. This may be in partly attributed to insufficient inhibition of platelet activation. In addition, it should not be underestimated that these drugs are not immune from bleeding complications. The substantial progress in understating the regulation of platelet activation has played a key role in the development of novel antiplatelet agents. Current examples of drug under development and evaluation include: novel P2Y(12) receptor inhibitors (prasugrel, ticagrelor, cangrelor, and elinogrel), thrombin receptor PAR-1 antagonists (vorapaxar, atopaxar), new integrin glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and inhibitors targeting the thromboxane receptor (TP), phosphodiesterases, the collagen receptor glycoprotein VI, and intraplatelet signalling molecules. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action and current clinical evaluation of these novel antiplatelet agents.     

The basis of platelets: platelets and atherothrombosis: an understanding of the lack of efficacy of aspirin in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and diabetic patients

Platelet activation subsequent to the adhesion of platelets to the vascular wall results in the release of mediators that promote platelet aggregation, which plays a pivotal role in the development of the polyvascular atherosclerotic disease that can be referred to by the acronym 'ATIS' (AtheroThrombosIS). The currently available antiplatelet drugs used to prevent vascular events in patients with cardiovascular disease, including peripheral arterial disease (PAD), include aspirin and thienopyridines such as clopidogrel. These drugs decrease platelet aggregability, each of them by inhibiting a different pathway of platelet activation and recruitment. Aspirin acts by inhibiting thromboxane A2 (TXA2) formation through the inhibition (acetylation) of cyclo-oxygenase. On the other hand, thienopyridines suppress the platelet aggregation adenosine diphosphate (ADP) pathway by inhibiting the platelet P2Y12 subtype of the ADP receptor. The results of the large ATT (Antithrombotic Trialists' Collaboration) meta-analysis of published clinical studies on aspirin, reported in 2002, confirmed the previous meta-analysis and major trials that treatment with aspirin (mixed with other antiplatelet agents in these large meta-analyses) can prevent vascular events in high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease. However, it must be stressed that specifically in PAD patients no significant effect of aspirin was demonstrated in a more recent meta-analysis. This was also the case for primary and secondary prevention in diabetic patients. In keeping with these observations, neither a five-year follow-up study of Japanese diabetic patients in the JPAD (Japanese Primary Prevention of Atherosclerosis with Aspirin for Diabetes) study, a seven-year follow-up study of UK diabetic patients with PAD in the POPADAD (Prevention of Progression of Arterial Disease and Diabetes) study, nor a very recent Scottish study in the same population of diabetics with PAD revealed a significant beneficial effect for aspirin in preventing ischaemic events. This failure may be a consequence of more rapid recovery of platelet aggregability following each dose of aspirin in these PAD or diabetic populations, with the accelerated platelet turnover resulting in a condition of aspirin resistance. Results of the large scale CAPRIE (Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events) trial that evaluated clopidogrel in patients with cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction or PAD have found clopidogrel to be significantly more effective than aspirin in preventing ischaemic events in patients with PAD. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis of the study has confirmed the efficacy of clopidogrel in diabetic patients with PAD, showing a significant reduction of events in clopidogrel-treated, compared with aspirin-treated, diabetic patients. These results are also likely to be attributable to the greater frequency of aspirin resistance in aspirin-treated patients in these populations (diabetics and/or PAD). Platelets, through activation and aggregation, have an important role in ATIS. However, although antiplatelet therapy with low-dose aspirin has been reported to prevent vascular events in high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease, recent studies in patients with PAD or diabetes mellitus have failed to support the efficacy of aspirin in preventing vascular events in these patient populations. In contrast, clopidogrel appears to be a useful antiplatelet agent in the prevention of vascular events in patients with PAD or diabetes.