Pathogenesis,classification, and therapy of eosinophilia and eosinophil disorders

Eosinophilia is a recurrent feature and diagnostic clue in several hematologic malignancies. In stem cell- and myelopoietic neoplasms, eosinophils are derived from the malignant clone, whereas in lymphoid neoplasms and reactive states, eosinophilia is usually triggered by eosinopoietic cytokines. Myeloid neoplasms typically presenting with eosinophilia include chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic eosinophilic leukemia (CEL), other myeloproliferative neoplasms, some acute leukemias, advanced mast cell disorders, and rare forms of myelodysplastic syndromes. Diagnostic evaluations in unexplained eosinophilia have to take these diagnoses into account. In such patients, a thorough hematologic work-up including bone marrow histology and immunohistochemistry, cytogenetics, molecular markers, and a complete staging of potentially affected organ systems has to be initiated. Endomyocardial fibrosis, the most dangerous cardiovascular complication of the hypereosinophilic state, is frequently detected in PDGFR-mutated neoplasms, specifically in FIP1L1/PDGFRA+ CEL, but is usually not seen in other myeloid neoplasms or reactive eosinophilia, even if eosinophilia is recorded for many years. Treatment of hypereosinophilic patients depends on the variant of disease, presence of end organ damage, molecular targets, and the overall situation in each case. In a group of patients, oncogenic tyrosine kinases (TK) such as FIP1L1/PDGFRA, can be employed as therapeutic targets by using imatinib or other TK-blocking agents.     

Pathogenesis and classification of eosinophil disorders: a review of recent developments in the field

Eosinophils and their products play an essential role in the pathogenesis of various reactive and neoplastic disorders. Depending on the underlying disease, molecular defect and involved cytokines, hypereosinophilia may develop and may lead to organ damage. In other patients, persistent eosinophilia is accompanied by typical clinical findings, but the causative role and impact of eosinophilia remain uncertain. For patients with eosinophil-mediated organ pathology, early therapeutic intervention with agents reducing eosinophil counts can be effective in limiting or preventing irreversible organ damage. Therefore, it is important to approach eosinophil disorders and related syndromes early by using established criteria, to perform all appropriate staging investigations, and to search for molecular targets of therapy. In this article, we review current concepts in the pathogenesis and evolution of eosinophilia and eosinophil-related organ damage in neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions. In addition, we discuss classifications of eosinophil disorders and related syndromes as well as diagnostic algorithms and standard treatment for various eosinophil-related disorders.     

The implications of revised WHO classification (2008) of chronic myeloid neoplasms

Myeloid disorders constitute a subgroup of hematological malignancies of myeloid lineage. In the revised 2008 WHO classification system, the nomenclature for myeloproliferative entities has been changed from "chronic myeloproliferative diseases" to "myeloproliferative neoplasms", the definition criteria has changed, and and the MDS/MPN has emerged as a well defined entity the subgroup formerly known as "myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases" has changed to "myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms". The World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms relies on the association of clinical, morphologic, immunophenotypic and genetic diagnostic features. The current review highlights these changes and also provides diagnostic algorithms that are tailored to routine clinical practice.     

Advances in diagnosis of mastocytosis and hypereosinophilic syndrome☆

Mastocytosis and hypereosinophilic syndrome is very rare neoplastic hematopoietic diseases. Mastocytosis is characterized by expansion and accumulation of clonal tissue mast cells in skin and/or various internal organs, while hypereosinophilic syndrome manifests with an increased number of eosinophils in the peripheral blood and tissue damage. These diseases represent a diagnostic challenge, since they can have overlapping clinical and pathologic features. Recently, great advances in the molecular and immunophenotypic diagnosis of these two entities were achieved, contributing to the new World Health Organization (WHO) classification.The WHO classification of myeloid neoplasms has been revised in 2016 by adding several new entities and refinement of the 2008 WHO classification, in an attempt to incorporate up-to-date clinical, prognostic, morphologic, and molecular genetics data that emerged since 2008. Here we overview the recent advances in disease diagnosis, with a focus on the updated WHO classification, refined diagnostic criteria, and up-to-date molecular findings in these two rare diseases.     

The role of eosinophil morphology in distinguishing between reactive eosinophilia and eosinophilia as a feature of a myeloid neoplasm

Morphological features of eosinophils in patients with reactive eosinophilia (28 patients) and clonal eosinophilia (26 patients) have been compared with each other and with the eosinophil characteristics of healthy volunteers (three subjects) and of patients with the idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (three patients). Morphological features, assessed in isolation from other haematological abnormalities, were found to have poor specificity for a myeloid neoplasm. The most useful feature was the presence of basophilic granules in mature eosinophils, which was associated particularly with acute myeloid leukaemia with inv(16). Marked reduction in granules occurred more often in some subsets of the myeloid neoplasm group but nevertheless was lacking in specificity since it was not infrequently seen in reactive eosinophilia. Although experienced morphologists more often considered that a myeloid neoplasm was likely in patients in whom this was the diagnosis (69%), myeloid neoplasia was also considered likely in a considerable proportion (39%) of patients with reactive eosinophilia. Morphological abnormalities of eosinophils therefore cannot be assessed in isolation in seeking to make a diagnosis of a myeloid neoplasm. Morphology is, however, needed and should be integrated with the results of other investigations.     

World Health Organization‐defined eosinophilic disorders: 2015 update on diagnosis,risk stratification,and management

Disease overview : The eosinophilias encompass a broad range of non‐hematologic (secondary or reactive) and hematologic (primary, clonal) disorders with potential for end‐organ damage. Diagnosis : Hypereosinophilia has generally been defined as a peripheral blood eosinophil count greater than 1,500/mm³ and may be associated with tissue damage. After exclusion of secondary causes of eosinophilia, diagnostic evaluation of primary eosinophilias relies on a combination of morphologic review of the blood and marrow, standard cytogenetics, fluorescent in situ‐hybridization, flow immunocytometry, and T‐cell clonality assessment to detect histopathologic or clonal evidence for an acute or chronic myeloid or lymphoproliferative disorder. Risk stratification : Disease prognosis relies on identifying the subtype of eosinophilia. After evaluation of secondary causes of eosinophilia, the 2008 World Health Organization establishes a semi‐molecular classification scheme of disease subtypes including ‘myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and abnormalities of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1’, chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified, (CEL, NOS), lymphocyte‐variant hypereosinophilia, and idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), which is a diagnosis of exclusion. Risk‐adapted therapy : The goal of the therapy is to mitigate eosinophil‐mediated organ damage. For patients with milder forms of eosinophilia (e.g. < 1,500/mm³) without symptoms or signs of organ involvement, a watch and wait approach with close‐follow‐up may be undertaken. Identification of rearranged PDGFRA or PDGFRB is critical because of the exquisite responsiveness of these diseases to imatinib. Corticosteroids are first‐line therapy for patients with lymphocyte‐variant hypereosinophilia and HES. Hydroxyurea and interferon‐alpha have demonstrated efficacy as initial treatment and steroid‐refractory cases of HES. In addition to hydroxyurea, second line cytotoxic chemotherapy agents and hematopoietic cell transplant have been used for aggressive forms of HES and CEL with outcomes reported for limited numbers of patients. Although clinical trials have been performed with anti IL‐5 (mepolizumab) and anti‐CD52 (alemtuzumab) antibodies, their therapeutic role in primary eosinophilic diseases and HES has yet to be established. Am. J. Hematol. 90:1077–1089, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms

A World Health Organization (WHO) classification of hematopoietic and lymphoid neoplasms has recently been published. This classification was developed through the collaborative efforts of the Society for Hematopathology, the European Association of Hematopathologists, and more than 100 clinical hematologists and scientists who are internationally recognized for their expertise in hematopoietic neoplasms. For the lymphoid neoplasms, this classification provides a refinement of the entities described in the Revised European-American Lymphoma (REAL) Classification-a system that is now used worldwide. To date, however, there has been no published explanation or rationale given for the WHO classification of the myeloid neoplasms. The purpose of this communication is to outline briefly the WHO classification of malignant myeloid diseases, to draw attention to major differences between it and antecedent classification schemes, and to provide the rationale for those differences.     

Flow cytometric immunophenotyping for hematologic neoplasms

Flow cytometric immunophenotyping remains an indispensable tool for the diagnosis, classification, staging, and monitoring of hematologic neoplasms. The last 10 years have seen advances in flow cytometry instrumentation and availability of an expanded range of antibodies and fluorochromes that have improved our ability to identify different normal cell populations and recognize phenotypic aberrancies, even when present in a small proportion of the cells analyzed. Phenotypically abnormal populations have been documented in many hematologic neoplasms, including lymphoma, chronic lymphoid leukemias, plasma cell neoplasms, acute leukemia, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, mast cell disease, myelodysplastic syndromes, and myeloproliferative disorders. The past decade has also seen refinement of the criteria used to identify distinct disease entities with widespread adoption of the 2001 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. This classification endorses a multiparametric approach to diagnosis and outlines the morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genotypic features characteristic of each disease entity. When should flow cytometric immunophenotyping be applied? The recent Bethesda International Consensus Conference on flow cytometric immunophenotypic analysis of hematolymphoid neoplasms made recommendations on the medical indications for flow cytometric testing. This review discusses how flow cytometric testing is currently applied in these clinical situations and how the information obtained can be used to direct other testing.     

Characteristic bone marrow findings in patients with UBA1 somatic mutations and VEXAS syndrome

VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) is a newly characterized syndrome with underlying somatic UBA1 mutations in myeloid cells linking hematologic disease with autoinflammatory rheumatologic disorders. Hematologic abnormalities, particularly peripheral blood cytopenia(s) may prompt bone marrow evaluation in patients with known or unrecognized VEXAS syndrome. This review highlights key findings and diagnostic considerations encountered during bone marrow examination in patients with this disorder. Frequently reported hematologic changes include macrocytic anemia, cytoplasmic vacuoles in myeloid and erythroid precursors, marrow hypercellularity, and varying degrees of dysplasia. Myelodysplastic syndrome and plasma cell neoplasms have been diagnosed in patients with VEXAS syndrome. Macrophage activation syndrome and/or hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis have also been reported. The bone marrow is a target organ in VEXAS syndrome. Heightened awareness of the bone marrow features and hematologic complications may aid in identifying individuals with VEXAS who may benefit from increased disease surveillance or alternative therapeutic strategies.     

Natural killer cell neoplasm: biology and pathology

Natural killer (NK) cell neoplasm is a heterogeneous disease group. In the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumours of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues (2008), disease entities considered as NK-cell derivation include NK-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, chronic lymphoproliferative disorders of NK cells, aggressive NK-cell leukemia, and extranodal NK-cell lymphoma, nasal-type. Despite recent advances in NK-cell research, which have expanded our understanding of the biology of NK-cell neoplasm, it cannot yet be sharply delineated from myeloid neoplasms and T-cell neoplasms even in some “well-known” entity, such as extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. This review describes current knowledge of the biology of NK cells and pathology of NK neoplasms as classified in the 2008 WHO classification of tumours of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues.     

World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2012 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

Disease overview: The eosinophilias encompass a broad range of nonhematologic (secondary or reactive) and hematologic (primary, clonal) disorders with potential for end‐organ damage. Diagnosis: Hypereosinophilia has generally been defined as a peripheral blood eosinophil count greater than 1,500/mm³ and may be associated with tissue damage. After exclusion of secondary causes of eosinophilia, diagnostic evaluation of primary eosinophilias relies on a combination of morphologic review of the blood and marrow, standard cytogenetics, fluorescent in situ‐hybridization, flow immunocytometry, and T‐cell clonality assessment to detect histopathologic or clonal evidence for an acute or chronic myeloid or lymphoproliferative disorder. Risk stratification: Disease prognosis relies on identifying the subtype of eosinophilia. After evaluation of secondary causes of eosinophilia, the 2008 World Health Organization establishes a semimolecular classification scheme of disease subtypes including “myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and abnormalities of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or FGFR1,” chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified' (CEL, NOS), lymphocyte‐variant hypereosinophilia, and idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), which is a diagnosis of exclusion. Risk‐adapted therapy: The goal of therapy is to mitigate eosinophil‐mediated organ damage. For patients with milder forms of eosinophilia (e.g., <1,500/mm³) without symptoms or signs of organ involvement, a watch and wait approach with close‐follow‐up may be undertaken. Identification of rearranged PDGFRA or PDGFRB is critical because of the exquisite responsiveness of these diseases to imatinib. Corticosteroids are first‐line therapy for patients with lymphocyte‐variant hypereosinophilia and HES. Hydroxyurea and interferon‐alpha have demonstrated efficacy as initial treatment and steroid‐refractory cases of HES. In addition to hydroxyurea, second line cytotoxic chemotherapy agents and hematopoietic cell transplant have been used for aggressive forms of HES and CEL with outcomes reported for limited numbers of patients. Although clinical trials have been performed with anti IL‐5 (mepolizumab) and anti‐CD52 (alemtuzumab) antibodies, their therapeutic role in primary eosinophilic diseases and HES has yet to be established. Am. J. Hematol. 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Epidemiology, classification and prognosis of adults and children with myelodysplastic syndromes

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) belong to the most frequent bone marrow diseases with a crude incidence of about 4 in 100,000 per year. The diagnosis of MDS still is mainly based on morphologic findings in blood and marrow. The new WHO classification system takes into account the medullary and peripheral blast count as well as the degree of dysplasia in the different cell lines. To correctly identify MDS types, cytogenetic evaluation is of importance, as the WHO classification introduced the entity MDS with del(5q), which is characterized by special morphologic and hematologic features. The separation of MDS from acute leukemias has been redefined using a cutoff value of 20% peripheral and/or medullary blasts. The International Prognostic Scoring System still is the gold standard in prognostication, but new items like transfusion need will be used more and more and have been incorporated into the WHO adapted Prognostic Scoring System. In childhood, MDS is uncommon, accounting for less than 5% of all hematopoietic neoplasms in patients less than 14 years of age. To accommodate for the characteristics of pediatric MDS, a simple classification scheme based on morphological features and conforming with the WHO suggestions was proposed. The dysplastic prodrome of acute myeloid leukemia in Down syndrome is classified within myeloid leukemia in Down syndrome and excluded from the population-based studies of MDS.     

REVIEW: Recent advances in the diagnosis and classification of myeloid neoplasms – comments on the 2008 WHO classification

The fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms refined the criteria for some previously described myeloid neoplasms and recognized several new entities based on recent elucidation of molecular pathogenesis, identification of new diagnostic and prognostic markers, and progress in clinical management. Protein tyrosine kinase abnormalities, including translocations or mutations involving ABL1, JAK2, MPL, KIT, PDGFRA, PDGFRB, and FGFR1, have been used as the basis for classifying myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Two new entities - refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia and refractory cytopenia of childhood have been added to the group of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and ‘refractory anemia with excess blasts-1’ has been redefined to emphasize the prognostic significance of increased blasts in the peripheral blood. A list of cytogenetic abnormalities has been introduced as presumptive evidence of MDS in cases with refractory cytopenia but without morphologic evidence of dysplasia. The subgroup ‘acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with recurrent genetic abnormalities’ has been expanded to include more molecular genetic aberrations. The entity ‘AML with multilineage dysplasia’ specified in the 2001 WHO classification has been renamed ‘AML with myelodysplasia-related changes’ to include not only cases with significant multilineage dysplasia but also patients with a history of MDS or myelodysplasia-related cytogenetic abnormalities. The term ‘therapy-related myeloid neoplasms’ is used to cover the spectrum of disorders previously known as t-AML, t-MDS, or t-MDS/MPN occurring as complications of cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. In this review, we summarize many of these important changes and discuss some of the diagnostic challenges that remain.     

Molecular findings in myeloid neoplasms

The proliferation of new molecular technologies in recent years has greatly advanced our knowledge of the genetics that underlie hematologic cancers. Particularly, with the advent and wide-implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS), a host of somatic (and some germline) gene mutations have been identified as significant in the classification, prognostication, and treatment of the spectrum of myeloid neoplasms. These driver and disease modifier mutations now play a prominent role in the updated international diagnostic guidelines of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS), and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). As high-throughput technologies such as NGS increasingly become standard in the genetic evaluation of myeloid disorders, it is critical that clinicians understand the clinical relevance of these mutations in order to further personalize patient care. In this review we discuss some of the most essential somatic and cytogenetic findings.     

Interleukin-4 and interleukin-5 map to human chromosome 5 in a region encoding growth factors and receptors and are deleted in myeloid leukemias with a del(5q)

Interleukin-4 (IL-4) is a potent mediator of growth and differentiation of cells of several hematopoietic lineages. Interleukin-5 (IL-5) is a lineage-specific hematopoietic growth factor that stimulates the production of eosinophils and eosinophil colonies from normal human bone marrow cells. By using somatic cell hybrids and in situ chromosomal hybridization, we localized the IL-4 and IL-5 genes to human chromosome 5 at bands q23-31, a chromosomal region that is frequently deleted [del(5q)] in patients with myeloid disorders. By in situ hybridization, the IL-4 and IL-5 genes were found to be deleted in the 5q- chromosome of four patients with refractory anemia (RA) or therapy-related acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (t-ANLL), who had a del(5q). Thus a small segment of chromosome 5 contains IL-4, IL-5, IL- 3, and GM-CSF as well as other genes such as CD14 and EGR1. Our findings that each of these genes was deleted in the 5q- chromosome suggest that loss of function of one or more of these genes may play an important role in the pathogenesis of hematologic disorders associated with a del(5q).     

WHO-EORTC classification for cutaneous lymphomas

Primary cutaneous lymphomas are currently classified by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) classification or the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, but both systems have shortcomings. In particular, differences in the classification of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas other than mycosis fungoides, Sezary syndrome, and the group of primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders and the classification and terminology of different types of cutaneous B-cell lymphomas have resulted in considerable debate and confusion. During recent consensus meetings representatives of both systems reached agreement on a new classification, which is now called the WHO-EORTC classification. In this paper we describe the characteristic features of the different primary cutaneous lymphomas and other hematologic neoplasms frequently presenting in the skin, and discuss differences with the previous classification schemes. In addition, the relative frequency and survival data of 1905 patients with primary cutaneous lymphomas derived from Dutch and Austrian registries for primary cutaneous lymphomas are presented to illustrate the clinical significance of this new classification.     

Eosinophil colony formation in semisolid cultures of human bone marrow cells.

A method for in situ staining and scoring of eosinophil colonies and clusters in the whole culture dish has been developed for agar cultures of human marrow cells. Cultures stimulated by human placental conditioned medium were found to develop the same proportion of eosinophil, neutrophil, and monocyte colonies as cultures stimulated by conventional peripheral white cell underlayers. Eosinophil colonies and clusters always contained pure populations of eosinophils, and no mixed colonies of eosinophils with other cells were observed. Eosinophil colony formation was delayed in onset relative to neutrophil or monocyte colony formation, but by day 14 eosinophil colonies comprised 20% of all colonies. Eosinophil colonies were absent in cultures of marrow cells from patients with acute myeloid leukemia in relapse, but eosinophil colonies and clusters were found with higher than normal frequency in cultures from acute leukemic patients in remission. A high frequency of eosinophil colonies and clusters was also observed in cultures from three patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. The new staining procedure should permit a wide range of studies on eosinophil precursor populations in the marrows of patients with various diseases.     

A statement by the Japan‐Korea expert pathologists for future clinicopathological and molecular analyses toward consensus building of intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct through several opinions at the present stage

Intraductal papillary neoplasm of bile duct (IPNB) was described as a preinvasive neoplastic lesion of the biliary tract in the 2010 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Although a number of studies have since been conducted on IPNBs, controversy remains, particularly regarding the standardization of its definition. Meetings by Japanese and Korean expert pathologists were held twice to resolve the pathological diagnostic aspects of IPNB. Through round‐table discussions and histological reviews, we reached the common understanding that IPNBs diagnosed according to the criteria of WHO 2010 are characterized by intraductal predominant papillary or villous biliary neoplasms covering delicate fibrovascular stalks and are classified into two types pathologically. One type (type 1 IPNB) is histologically similar to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of pancreas, and typically develops in the intrahepatic bile ducts, while the other (type 2 IPNB) has a more complex histological architecture with irregular papillary branching or with foci of solid‐tubular components and typically involves the extrahepatic bile ducts. This report states the diagnostic pathologic features of IPNB proposed by WHO 2010. Since currently, the concept of IPNB is still confusing, the proposed diagnostic pathologic features stated here will be of use for future clinicopathological and molecular analyses toward consensus building of IPNB.     

Classification and diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms according to the 2008 World Health Organization criteria

The myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) were first recognized by William Dameshek in 1951. The classic MPNs were polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and chronic myelogenous leukemia. They were originally grouped together based on their shared phenotype of myeloproliferation. Since then, important discoveries have been made, identifying a central role of protein tyrosine kinases in the pathogenesis of these disorders. As such, the 2008 WHO diagnostic classification for myeloproliferative neoplasms has incorporated molecular markers with histologic, clinical and laboratory information into the diagnostic algorithms for the MPNs. Important changes include (1) the change of nomenclature of myeloproliferative disorder to myeloproliferative neoplasm emphasizing the clonal nature of these disorders; (2) the classification of mast cell disease as an MPN; (3) the reorganization of the eosinophilic disorders into a molecularly defined category of PDGFRA, PDGFRB and FGFR1-associated myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified; and (4) refinement of the diagnostic criteria for PV, ET and PMF incorporating recently described molecular markers, JAK2V617F, JAK2 exon 12 mutations and MPL mutations. This review focuses upon the important changes of the 2008 WHO diagnostic criteria for MPNs.