Cytogenetic analysis of pancreatic carcinomas: Intratumor heterogeneity and nonrandom pattern of chromosome aberrations

Twenty-nine nonendocrine pancreatic carcinomas (20 primary tumors and nine metastases) were studied by chromosome banding after short-term culture. Acquired clonal aberrations were found in 25 tumors and a detailed analysis of these revealed extensive cytogenetic intratumor heterogeneity. Apart from six carcinomas with one clone only, 19 tumors displayed from two to 58 clones, bringing the total number of clones to 230. Karyotypically related clones, signifying evolutionary variation, were found in 16 tumors, whereas unrelated clones were present in nine, the latter finding probably reflecting a distinct pathogenetic mechanism. The cytogenetic profile of pancreatic carcinoma was characterized by multiple numerical and structural changes. In total, more than 500 abnormal chromosomes, including rings, markers, homogeneously stained regions, and double minutes, altogether displaying 608 breakpoints, were detected. This complexity and heterogeneity notwithstanding, a nonrandom karyotypic pattern can be discerned in pancreatic cancer. Chromosomes 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 17, and 19 and bands 1q12, 1q21, 3q11, 6p21, 6q21, 7q11, 7q22, 7q32, 11q13, 13cen, 14cen, 17q11, 17q21, and 19q13 were most frequently involved in structural rearrangements. A total of 19 recurrent unbalanced structural changes were identified, 11 of which were not reported previously: del(1)(q11), del(3)(p11), i(3)(q10), del(4)(q25), del(11)(p13), dup(11)(q13q23), i(12)(p10), der(13;15)(q10;q10), del(18)(q12), del(18)(q21), and i(19)(q10). The main karyotypic imbalances were entire-copy losses of chromosomes 18, Y, and 21, gains of chromosomes 7, 2, and 20, partial or whole-arm losses of 1p, 3p, 6q, 8p, 9p, 15q, 17p, 18q, 19p, and 20p, and partial or whole-arm gains of 1q, 3q, 5p, 6p, 7q, 8q, 11q, 12p, 17q, 19q, and 20q. In general, the karyotypic pattern of pancreatic carcinoma fits the multistep carcinogenesis concept. The observed cytogenetic heterogeneity appears to reflect a multitude of interchangeable but oncogenetically equivalent events, and the nonrandomness of the chromosomal alterations underscores the preferential pathways involved in tumor initiation and progression. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 23:81–99, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Chromosome analysis of 97 primary breast carcinomas: Identification of eight karyotypic subgroups

Chromosome banding analysis of 97 short-term cultured primary breast carcinomas revealed clonal aberrations in 79 tumors, whereas 18 were karyotypically normal. In 34 of the 79 tumors with abnormalities, two to eight clones per case were detected; unrelated clones were present in 27 (34%) cases, whereas only related clones were found in seven. These findings indicate that a substantial proportion of breast carcinomas are of polyclonal origin. Altogether eight abnormalities were repeatedly identified both as sole chromosomal anomalies and as part of more complex karyotypes: the structural rearrangements i(1)(q10), der(1;16)(q10;p10), del(1)(q11–12), del(3)(p12–13p14–21), and del(6)(q21–22) and the numerical aberrations +7, +18, and +20. At least one of these changes was found in 41 (52%) of the karyotypically abnormal tumors. They identify a minimum number of cytogenetic subgroups in breast cancer and are likely to represent primary chromosome anomalies in this type of neoplasia. Other candidates for such a role are translocations of 3p12–13 and 4q21 with various partner chromosomes and inversions of chromosome 7, which also were seen repeatedly. Additional chromosomal aberrations that give the impression of occurring nonrandomly in breast carcinomas include structural rearrangements leading to partial monosomies for 1p, 8p, 11p, 11q, 15p, 17p, 19p, and 19q and losses of one copy of chromosomes X, 8, 9, 13, 14, 17, and 22. The latter changes were seen consistently only in complex karyotypes, however, and we therefore interpret them as being secondary anomalies acquired during clonal evolution.     

Multiple cytogenetic abnormalities in a case of osteosarcoma

Cytogenetic analysis of a highly malignant osteosarcoma in a 17-year-old girl revealed extremely complex karyotypic changes with several different clonal numerical and structural chromosome aberrations. The composite karyotype was interpreted as 39–41,X,t(X;9)(q11;p24), −1,der(1),−4,−4,−5,i(7q),−8,del(8)(q21),t(10;19)(p13;q13),del(11)(p11p13),t(12;18)(q24;q12), −13,13q+,−14,14p+,−15,15q+,17p+,19q+,−21,+22,+3–6 mar.     

Karyotypic findings in two cases of male breast cancer

Male breast cancer is uncommon; so far, only 10 cases with chromosome banding analysis have been published. We report the cytogenetic findings of two invasive breast cancers in two Caucasian men lacking a history of familial breast cancer and more than 70 years of age. Both had ductal carcinomas with lymphangiosis carcinomatosa and positive lymph nodes at diagnosis. Strong expression of estrogen receptor, weak expression of progesterone receptor, and lack of expression of androgen receptor by both tumors were demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, as well as lack of expression of p53 and C-ERB-B-2. The karyotypes were 45 approximately 46,XY,-Y[4],-7[2],+8[2],t(8;12)(q21;q24)[3], del(9)(q22)[3],del(11)(p11p14)[5],del(18)(q21)[7], t(19;20)(p10;q10)[8] [cp13] and 61 approximately 69,XXXY,-Y[3], del(2)(p21)[4],del(3)(p22q26)[3],-4,-4[5],+5,+5[5], dic(5;11)(p14;q23)[3],del(6)(q23)[4],del(8)(p21)[3],-9[4],-11[4],+ i(12)(p10)[4],-16[3],del(17)([13)[5],del(18)(q21)[4],+19[5], +20[4][cp7], respectively. Although the available data on male breast cancer are still very limited, our findings confirm that gain of an X chromosome, loss of the Y chromosome, gain of chromosome 5, and loss of material from chromosomes 17 and 18 are nonrandom aberrations in male breast cancer. Trisomy 8, characteristic of ductal carcinomas, was found in one case.     

Karyotypic characterization of colorectal adenocarcinomas

Cytogenetic analysis of short-term cultures from 52 primary colorectal adenocarcinomas revealed clonal chromosome aberrations in 45 tumors, whereas the remaining 7 had a normal karyotype. More than 1 abnormal clone was detected in 26 tumors; in 18 of them, the clones were cytogenetically unrelated. The modal chromosome number was near-diploid in 32 tumors and near-triploid to near-tetraploid in 13. Only numerical aberrations were identified in 13 carcinomas, only structural aberrations in 3, and 29 had both numerical and structural changes. The most common numerical abnormalities were, in order of decreasing frequency, gains of chromosomes 7, 13, 20, and Y and losses of chromosomes 18, Y, 14, and 15. The structural changes most often affected chromosomes 1, 17, 8, 7, and 13. The most frequently rearranged chromosome bands were, in order of decreasing frequency, 13q10, 17p10, 1p22, 8q10, 17p11, 7q11, 1p33, 7p22, 7q32, 12q24, 16p13, and 19p13. Frequently recurring aberrations affecting these bands were del(1)(p22), i(8)(q10), i(13)(q10), and add(17)(p11–13). The most common partial gains were from chromosome arms 8q, 13q, and 17q and the most common partial losses from chromosome arms 1p, 8p, 13p, and 17p. A correlation analysis between the karyotype and the clinicopathologic features in our total material, which consists of altogether 153 colorectal carcinomas, including 116 with an abnormal karyotype, showed a statistically significant association (P < 0.05) between the karyotype and tumor grade and site. Carcinomas with structural chromosome rearrangements were often poorly differentiated; well and moderately differentiated tumors often had only numerical aberrations or normal karyotypes. Abnormal karyotypes were more common in rectal carcinomas than in carcinomas situated higher up. Near-triploid to near-tetraploid karyotypes were more than twice as frequent in tumors of the distal colon as in those of the proximal colon and rectum. The cytogenetic data indicate that carcinomas located in the proximal colon and rectum, which often are near-diploid with simple numerical changes and cytogenetically unrelated clones, probably arise through different mechanisms than do tumors located in the distal colon, which more often have complex near-triploid to near-tetraploid karyotypes.     

Ossifying fibromyxoid tumor of soft parts. Cytogenetic findings

Ossifying fibromyxoid tumor (OFMT) of soft parts is a recently described, rare but morphologically distinctive soft tissue tumor. The histogenesis of this lesion remains uncertain, although several immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features suggest that it is an unusual neural tumor, possibly of Schwann cell origin. We report here a case of a malignant variant of OFMT that occurred in the foot of a 52-year-old man. The karyotype of a pulmonary metastasis exhibited the following complex numeric and structural aberrations:72 approximately 74,XXY,-5,+6,+del(8)(p21),del(9)(p22),+10,der(11)t(3;11)(p21;p15),del(12) (q13),der(13)t(5;13)(q13;q34),+18,+19,+20,-22 [cp10]. A kidney metastasis exhibited the following karyotypic abnormalities: 46,XY,add(3)(p11),+der(3)t(3;?;11)(3qter-->3p11::?::11q13-->11qter), -5,del(8)(p21),add(9)(q22),del(9)(p22),der(11)t(3;11)(p21;p15),del(12)(q13),+der(13)t(5;13) (q13;q34),-22. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of OFMT in which clonal chromosomal aberrations have been shown.     

Complex karyotypic changes, including rearrangements of 12q13 and 14q24, in two leiomyosarcomas

Cytogenetic investigation of short-term cultures from two leiomyosarcomas revealed complex karyotypic changes in both cases. The first tumor, a subcutaneous leiomyosarcoma of the knee, had the karyotype 70-80,XY, +X, +Y, +1, +1, +2, +2, +3, +3, +4, +4, +7, +7, +8, +8, +9, +10, +15, +15, +16, +16, +18, +19, +20, +21, +21, +22, +22,t(?;5)(5;21)(?;q35p11;q11), t(?;5)(5;21)(?;q35p11;q11), +del(11)(q22),der(13)t(12;13)(q13;q22),der(14)t(9;14)(p11;p11), +14p+, +t(20;?)(q13;?), +t(20;?)(q13;?), +2 mar. A polyploidized clone with 120-150 chromosomes was also observed. DNA flow cytometry revealed only one abnormal peak, corresponding to a DNA index of 1.76. The other tumor, a uterine leiomyosarcoma, had the karyotype 61-67, X, -X, +1, +3, +5, +6, +7, +8, +9, +12, +13, +15, +t(1;1)(p32;q32), +der(1)t(1;8)(p13;q11), +del(2)(p11), +del(2)(q22), +del(2)(q22), +del(3)(p13), +i(5p),t(8;14)(q24;q24), +der(8)t(8;14) (q24;q24), +del(10)(p12),der(11)t(11;15)(p15;q11),t(16;?)(p13;?),t(16;?)(q24;?), der dic(17) (17pter----cen----17q25::hsr::17q25----cen----17pte r), +t(19;?)(p13;?), +der dic(20)(20pter----cen----20q12::hsr::20q12----cen----+ ++20pter), +mar. The DNA index was 1.59. The finding in these leiomyosarcomas of rearrangements of the same regions of chromosomes 12 and 14 that are involved in the tumor-specific t(12;14)(q14-15;q23-24) of uterine leiomyoma indicates that the same genes in 12q and 14q might be important in the pathogenesis of benign and malignant smooth muscle tumors.     

Multiple apparently unrelated clonal chromosome abnormalities in a squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue

We have cytogenetically examined short-term cultures from a squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue, a tumor type in which chromosome aberrations hitherto have not been reported. No less than 12 pseudodiploid clones were detected, giving the tumor karyotype 46,X,der(X)t(X;1)(q26;p32),der(1)(Xqter→Xq26::1p32→cen→1q42:),del(13)(q11q21),t(15;?) (q26;?)/46,XX,t(1;?)(p34;?),inv(2)(p21q11)/46,XX,t(1;10)(p32;q24)/46,XX,+der(1)(12pter→ 12p11::1p11→cen→1q32::11q13→11q32→1q42:),del(11)(q13q22), - 12, der(17)t(1:17) (q42;p13)/46,XX,inv(1)(p22q44)/47,XX,del(1)(q32),der(17)t(1:17)(p22;q25),der(1)inv(1) (q25q44)t(1;17)(p22;q25),ins(14;7)(q11;q22q36), + 14/46,XX,t(1;4)(q23;q35)/46,XX,t(1;21) (q25;q22),t(2;10)(q31;q26),t(22;?)(q12;?)/46,XX,del(1)(q32)/46,XX,t(1;8)(q44;q21)/46,XX, t(2;21)(q11;p11)/46,XX,t(9;11)(q34;q13). The large number of apparently unrelated abnormalities leads us to suggest that the carcinoma may have been of multiclonal origin.     

Nonrandom pattern of cytogenetic abnormalities in squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx

Cytogenetic analysis of short-term cultures from 105 squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx (LSCC) revealed clonal chromosome aberrations in 56 tumors. Simple karyotypic changes (less than four aberrations per clone) were found in 24 cases, and the remaining 32 tumors had complex karyotypes with multiple numerical as well as unbalanced structural rearrangements. Extensive intratumor heterogeneity, in the form of multiple related subclones or unrelated clones, was observed in a large fraction of the tumors. The structural changes most often affected chromosomes 3, 1, 11, 7, 2, 15, 5, 4, 8, and 12, with rearrangements in the centromeric regions, i.e., the centromeric bands p10 and q10 and the juxtacentromeric bands p11 and q11, accounting for 43% of the total breakpoints. The most common imbalances brought about by numerical and unbalanced structural rearrangements were loss of chromosomal region 3p21-pter, chromosome arms 4p, 6q, 8p, 10p, 13p, 14p, 15p, and 17p, and gain of chromosomal regions 3q21-qter, 7q31-pter, and 8q. Among 17 recurrent aberrations identified, the most common were i(8q), hsr(11)(q13), i(3q), i(5p), and del(3)(p11). No statistically significant association was found between major karyotypic features and histological differentiation or TNM stage. The karyotypic features of the LSCC were also compared with previously published oral SCC, a subgroup of SCC that has been more extensively characterized cytogenetically. No clear-cut karyotypic differences were found between LSCC and oral SCC, with the exception that i(8q) was significantly more frequent among the latter.     

Cytogenetic abnormalities in 106 oral squamous cell carcinomas

We report karyotypic features of 106 short-term cultured oral squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), 51 new and 55 previously reported cases, with clonal chromosome aberrations. The major cytogenetic findings were as follows: simple karyotypic changes were present in 38 cases (36%) and 68 tumors (64%) displayed complex karyotypes. The most common numerical changes were +7, +8, +9, +16, +18, +20, and -4, -10, -13, -14, -18, -19, -21, -22, and -Y. Structural rearrangements frequently (43% of the breaks) affected the centromeric regions, resulting in the formation of isochromosomes and whole-arm translocations. Among the recurrent structural aberrations identified, the most common were i(1q), i(3q), i(5p), i(8q), del(16)(q22), and hsr. With the exception of chromosomal band 11q13, which was involved in 25 tumors, only centromeric or near-centromeric bands were commonly involved: 3p11 approximately q11 (59 cases), 8p11 approximately q11 (57), 1p11 approximately q11 (48), 13p11 approximately q11 (46), 5p11 approximately q11 (41), 14p11 approximately q11 (41), and 15p11 approximately q11 (37). Losses of genetic material dominated over gains. The most frequent imbalances included loss of 2q33 approximately qter, 3p, 4p, 6q, 8p, 10p, 11q, 13p, 14p, and 15p, and chromosomes 18, 21, 22, and Y, and gain of chromosomes 7 and 20, 8q, and 11q13. No major karyotypic differences could be discerned between the present series of oral SCC and a previously reported series of laryngeal SCC, indicating that common genetic pathways are involved in the initiation and progression of SCC irrespective of site of origin.     

Multiple structural chromosome rearrangements, including del(7q) and del(10q), in an adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Cytogenetic analysis of a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostate revealed the complex karyotype: 76-86,X, -Y, +X, +X, +del(X)(q24), +t(1;10) (p22;q24), -2, +der(2) t(1;2;?)(p32;q24p13;?), +der(2)t(1;2;?) (p32;dq24p13;?), +3, +3, +4, +5, +5, +6, +7, +del(7) (q22), -8, +der(8)t(8;?)(q24;?), + der(8)t(8;?)(q24;?), +9, +10, +10, +der(10)t (1;10)(q24;q22), +del (10)(q23), +11, +11, +12, +der(12)t(4;12)(q11;p11), +der(12)t(4;12) (q11;p11), +14, +der (15)t(1;15)(q21;p11), +t(16;?) (q21;?), +17, +18, +19, +19, +20, +20, +21, +22, +2-5 mar. The karyotype contains deletions of both 7q and 10q, abnormalities that also have been described previously in prostatic adenocarcinomas, and which hence may represent primary chromosomal rearrangements in this type of cancer.     

Chromosome abnormalities in hairy cell leukaemia variant

We describe chromosome abnormalities in 6 patients with hairy cell leukaemia (HCL) variant, a rare B-cell disorder with clinical and laboratory features intermediate between HCL and B-prolymphocytic leukaemia (B-PLL). All but one had marked splenomegaly and a raised white blood cell count (median 40 × 10⁹/l) with over 80% nucleolated hairy cells. These cells had a B-cell immunophenotype distinct from that of typical HCL. All patients but one are alive with stable disease with a median follow-up of 60 months. Numerical chromosome changes included loss of chromosomes 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 19, 21, and X. Three cases had translocations involving the immunoglobulin gene regions: t(14;17)(q32;q11), t(14;22)(q32;q11), and t(2;8)(p11.12;q24). Immunocytochemistry demonstrated the presence of the MYC protein in cells from the case with t(2;8) but not in two others. Other structural abnormalities included t(3;10)(q27;q22) and t(3;12)(q27;q13) in the same patient, der(17)t(7;10;17) (p11;q27;q22), t(1;3)(q25;p21), t(8;21)(p12;q11), t(17;21)(p11;p11), del(6)(q15), del(7)(q34), and del(14)(q24). Genes Chromosom Cancer 10:197–202 (1994). © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Quantitative acute leukemia cytogenetics.

Using literature data on cytogenetic abnormalities in 3,612 cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 1,551-cases of acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), we have attempted to quantify the information value of finding the typical ALL- and AML-associated chromosome aberrations. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of finding or not finding a given aberration were calculated for several diagnostic scenarios: for the differential diagnosis between ALL and AML when the patient is known to have acute leukemia, for the differential diagnosis among AML FAB subtypes in a patient with known AML, and for the differential diagnosis between ALL FAB subtypes in a patient with known ALL. The specificities were generally high, close to 1. The highest sensitivities in AML were found for +8, t(15;17)(q22;q11), t(8;21)(q22;q22), and -7 (all greater than 0.1), and in ALL for t(9;22)(q34;q11), t(4;11)(q21;q23), and +21 (again all greater than 0.1). In the AML subtypes, the highest sensitivities were 0.89 for t(15;17)(q22;q11) in M3, followed by 0.40 for t(8;21)(q22;q22) in M2, 0.30 for inv(16)(p13q22)/del(16)(q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22) in M4, and 0.16 for t(9;11)(p21;q23) in M5. In the ALL subtypes, the highest sensitivities were 0.71 and 0.11 for t(8;14)(q24;q32) and t(8;22)(q24;q11), respectively, in L3, 0.23 for t(9;22)(q34;q11) in L2, and 0.18 and 0.13 for +21 and t(4;11)(q21;q23), respectively, in L1. The highest (1.0) positive predictive values in the AML versus ALL comparison were found for t(1;3)(p36;q21), inv(3)(q21q26), t(6;9)(p23;q34), t(7;11)(p15;p15), t(8;16)(p11;p13), t(8;21)(q22;q22), t(15;17)(q22;q11), and, as sole anomalies, for +4, +9, and +11. In the reverse comparison, ALL versus AML, positive predictive values of 1.0 were found for t(1;14)(p32-34;q11), dup(I)(q12-21q31-32), t(2;8)(p12;q24), t(8;14)(q24;q32), t/dic(9;12)(p11-12;p11-13), t(10;14)(q24;q11), and t(11;14)(p13;q11). Among the AML subgroups, the highest predictive values were: 1.0 for M3 if t(15;17), 0.91 for M2 if t(8;21), 0.86 for M4 if inv/del(16)/t(16;16), and 0.82 for M5 if t(9;11). Among the ALL subtypes, positive predictive values of greater than 0.8 were reached only for the L3-associated aberrations t(2;8) (1.0), t(8;14) (0.95), t(8;22) (0.87), and dup(I) (0.80). The highest negative predictive values were in AML 0.98 that the disease is not M3 if t(15;17) is not found, and in ALL 0.96 that the patient does not have L3 if a t(8;14) is not detected.     

Chromosome abnormalities in a pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Short-term cultures initiated from a pancreatic adenocarcinoma were cytogenetically investigated. The composite karyotype was 74-76,XX,+X,+2,+3,+del(3)(p21),+5,+5,+der(7) t(1;7)(q21;p22),+der(7),del(8)(p21),+del(8)(p21),+der(8)t(8;?)(q24; +),+9,+9,+10,+10,+11,+11,+12,+13,+14,+der(14)t(14; +)(p11;?),+der(16)t(15;16)(q11;p13),+der(16),+der(17)t(17;?) (p11;?),+der(17),+18,+20,+20,-21,-21,+22,+22,+1-3mar. A comparison with the few previously cytogenetically characterized cases of this tumor type reveals no consistent abnormalities.     

Karyotypic characterization of urinary bladder transitional cell carcinomas

Samples from 34 primary transitional cell carcinomas (TCCs) of the bladder were short-term-cultured and processed for cytogenetic analysis after G-banding of the chromosomes. Clonal chromosome abnormalities were detected in 27 tumors and normal karyotypes in 3, and the cultures from 4 tumors failed to grow. Losses of genetic material were more common than gains, indicating that loss of tumor suppressor genes may be of major importance in TCC pathogenesis. There was no clonal heterogeneity within individual tumors, consonant with the view that TCCs are monoclonal in origin. The most striking finding was the involvement of chromosome 9 in 92% of the informative cases, as numerical loss of one chromosome copy in 15 cases, but as structural rearrangement in 8. The changes in chromosome 9 always led to loss of material; from 9p, from 9q, or of the entire chromosome. A total of 16 recurrent, unbalanced structural rearrangements were seen, of which del(1)(p11), add(3)(q21), add(5)(q11), del(6)(q13), add(7)(q11), add(11)(p11), i(13)(q10), del(14)(q24), and i(17)(q10) are described here for the first time. The karyotypic imbalances were dominated by losses of the entire or parts of chromosome arms 1p, 9p, 9q, 11p, 13p, and 17p, loss of an entire copy of chromosomes 9, 14, 16, 18, and the Y chromosome, and gains of chromosome arms 1q and 13q and of chromosomes 7 and 20. The chromosome bands and centomeric breakpoints preferentially involved in structural rearrangements were 1q12, 2q11, 5q11, 8q24, 9p13, 9q13, 9q22, 11p11, and 13p10. Rearrangements of 17p and the formation of an i(5)(p10) were associated with more aggressive tumor phenotypes. There was also a general correlation between the tumors' grade/stage and karyotypic complexity, indicating that progressive accumulation of acquired genetic alterations is the driving force behind multistep bladder TCC carcinogenesis.     

Direct chromosome analysis of seven primary colorectal carcinomas.

Chromosome studies were performed on direct preparations of seven cases of primary colorectal carcinomas. Two cases had relatively simple chromosome changes: 48,XY,+8,+21/51, XY,+8,+9,+10,+i(17q),+21, and 47,der(X)t(X;14)(q11;q11)-Y,t(6;18)(p22;q24)+7,+8,der(19)t (19;?)(q13;?). The five others had complicated deletions and translocations; 1p- was noted in five cases, and i(17q) was noted in three cases.     

Establishment and characterization of new cell lines derived from melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy arising in the mandible

Three cell systems (MINT1/2/3) derived from a melanotic neuroectodermal tumor of infancy (MNTI) arising in the mandible of a 1-month-old newborn boy have been established, and their cytological natures have been characterized. The cells had immunopositivities for pan-keratin, vimentin, neuron-specific enolase, S-100 protein and melanoma-associated antigen (HMB-45). These immunohistochemical phenotypes were basically the same as those observed in tissue sections, in which, synaptophysin, myelin basic protein, c-myc gene products, carcinoembryonic antigen, and epithelial membrane antigen were also immunolocalized in tumor cells. Karyotyping analyzes revealed that the chromosome numbers of the three cell systems ranged from 60 to 67 with 3n ploidies, and that there were many structural aberrations, such as del(11)(q13), del(22)(q13), add(2)(p11), add(7)(q22), extra copies for chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 20, and 22, der(9)t(9;13)(p13;q12)add(9)(q34), and der(13;21)(q10;q10), which were shared by the three cell systems, while der(19)t(11;19)(q13;p13) was found in MINT1 and MINT3. When stimulated by endothelin-3 and vitamin D(3), the cells had spinous cell shapes with immunopositivities for HMB-45, neurofilament protein and glial fibrillary acidic protein, which indicated more neural differentiation. The established cell systems will be useful for further investigation on the molecular and genetic basis of MNTI to understand its pathogenesis, which is largely unknown.     

Endometrial stromal sarcoma with clonal complex chromosome abnormalities. Report of a case and review of the literature.

Only eleven endometrial stromal sarcomas (ESS) with clonal chromosomal abnormalities have been reported in the literature. Of these, four have been reported to harbor the t(7;17) translocation. We report here an additional ESS that exhibited clonal complex chromosome abnormalities not described earlier: 38,XX,-1,del(1)(q11),-2,add(2)(p13),-3,der(4)add(4)(p12)psu dic(4;14)(q35;q11.2), add(6)(p21.3),add(7)(q22),del(7)(p11.2p13),-8,-9,add(9)(q34),- 10,add(10)(q24),-11,-11,ins(12;?) (q13;?),-14,-14,-15,ins(15;?)(q22;?),add(16)(q22),add(17)(q11.2),- 18,der(18)t(7;18)(q11.2;p11.2),-19, add(20)(p13),add(21)(p11.2),-22,add(22)(p11.2),+6mar in metaphase cells from primary short-term culture.     

Frequent rearrangements of chromosomes 1, 7, and 8 in primary liver cancer

Fifteen primary liver carcinomas (PLCs), including 12 hepatocellular carcinomas and three cholangiocellular carcinomas, were investigated cytogenetically after short-term culture. Ten tumors displayed clonal chromosomal abnormalities, whereas only normal karyotypes were detected in four cases, and one sample failed to grow in vitro. Structural rearrangements most often involved chromosomes 1, 7, and 8 and chromosome bands 1p36, 1q25, 3q10, 5q13, 6p10, 7p15, 7q22, 7q32, 8q10, 8q13, 14q10, and 17p11. Frequent genomic imbalances included gains of 1q, 3q, 6p, 7p, and 8q and losses of 1p, 8p, 10q, 14p, 17p, and 19p. A compilation of findings for all 19 cytogenetically abnormal PLCs reported to date, including the present cases, reveals that structural aberrations particularly affect 1p11, 1p22, 1p32, 1p34, 1p36, 1q25, 7p15, 7q22, 8q10, 8q13, 14q10, 16q24, and 17p11, and that the abnormalities frequently result in overrepresentation of 1q, 3q, 6p, 7p10–14, 8q, and 17q and underrepresentation of 1p34–36, 6q27, 7q32–qter, 8p, 13p, 14p, 16q24, and 17p. These genomic regions are likely to harbor genes of importance in hepatocarcinogenesis, and the present cytogenetic mapping may hence be of value for further molecular genetic investigations of PLC. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 23:26–35, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Cytogenetic studies of primary cultures of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Cytogenetic analysis was performed on primary cultures of 21 squamous cell carcinomas of the esophagus (SCCE). Seven cases exhibited mosaic clonal chromosome abnormalities distributed as follows: two contained tetraploid cell populations, one with t(3;7)(p21;q11); two showed loss of the Y chromosome, one with double minutes; single cases demonstrated der(11)t(4;11)(q?27;q23); add(1)(p35) and del(4)(p12); and del(7)(p13), del(7)(q22q34), and der(11)t(7;11)(p?15;p?13). The remaining 14 cases had apparently normal karyotypes, possibly derived from stromal elements. These results demonstrate numerical abnormalities and the multiple occurrence of rearrangements involving chromosomes 7 and 11 in SCCE.