改良双环法乳房下垂矫正术

目的:介绍改良双环法行乳房悬吊术的方法和经验。方法:采用传统的双环法环乳晕切口,切除双环间表皮,在皮肤与上半乳腺的腺体表面之间剥离,去除上半腺体后松弛的浅筋膜深层,上提腺体至正常位置并固定于深筋膜,同时进行腺体的适当折叠塑形或置入乳房假体增加丰满程度。结果:共行轻、中度下垂28例(4例为单侧下垂),其中悬吊加假体隆乳9例;腺体瓣交叉缝合悬吊塑形19例。术后乳房外形改善满意,乳头、乳晕感觉良好,效果持久。结论:本手术方法安全易行,组织损伤小,瘢痕不明显,是矫治轻、中度乳房下垂的一种比较理想的方法。     

Superior Pedicle Mammaplasty without Parenchymal Incisions after Massive Weight Loss

Background: After considerable weight loss, the breast suffers significant deformation. The ptotic breast is characterized by a lack of superior pole, tissue excess in the inferior pole, down-migration of nipple-areola complex (NAC) with redundancy of skin tissue. The authors describe a mastopexy technique based on a modulated and progressive reshaping, back rotation, and suspension of mammary gland parenchyma without parenchymal incisions. Methods: Forty-five patients with bilateral moderate or severe breast ptosis underwent mastopexy from January 2011 to January 2014 with complete detachment of breast from the pectoralis major muscle and the plication of parenchyma without any parenchymal incision. Patients were followed up for one year, reporting any complication, and measuring the jugulum–NAC distance. The outcomes were assessed by the patients as well as the surgical team. Results: The aesthetic outcomes were good or excellent in all patients. The new mammary contour and the distance between the jugular fossa and the nipple were stable during this time with a good filling of upper pole. No major complications were reported. Conclusions: This technique gave good breast shape, long-term projection, and upper pole fullness, without parenchymal incisions. It restores breast shape and projection, especially in post-bariatric patients. A similar technique has not been described yet.     

Autoaugmentation Mastopexy with an Inferior-Based Pedicle

Mammaplasty for breast enhancement and correction of ptosis augmentation is described. Between 2002 and 2007, autoaugmentation mammaplasty was performed for 27 patients (age, 48 ± 7.3 years) using an inferior-based flap of deepithelialized dermoglandular tissue inserted beneath the breast parenchyma of a superior-based nipple-areolar complex pedicle. The results confirmed that autoaugmentation mammaplasty corrects ptosis while increasing the projection and apparent volume of the breast. The degree of inframammary fold (IMF) descent 6 months after surgery generally paralleled that of the nipple. The mean level of the IMF was below the mean level of the nipple. Postoperatively, the optimum distance had been largely achieved. The advantage of the technique is that it optimizes the shape and volume of the breast without the use of an implant.     

Key Points in Mastopexy

Breasts represent femininity and any change of shape may affect their appearance. Breast ptosis may be caused by several factors, including significant weight loss, pregnancy, long breastfeeding periods, and involution of the postmenopausal breast tissue. Breast ptosis may be associated with breast hypoplasia; thus, in case of a mastopexy with or without the use of implants being indicated, several considerations have to be taken into account: the wishes of the patient, age of the patient, degree of ptosis, parenchymal volume, covering tissue, quality of the tissue, pocket implant, shape and content of the implant, and resulting scars.     

A Systematic, One-stage Approach in the Treatment of Tuberous Breast Deformity

During a 2-year period, we performed a single-stage procedure on 7 patients with unilateral “tuberous” breasts after thorough analysis of the deformity and the contralateral breast. Deficient breast envelope skin was replaced by use of a laterally based random inframammary cutaneous flap. Breast tissue rearrangement with or without augmentation was required to address the parenchymal maldistribution and volume abnormalities. Associated tuberous breast ptosis was adequately corrected by tissue rearrangement, augmentation, and circumareolar mastopexy. Areola herniation and size were adjusted by performing a circumareolar mastopexy. Relocation of the inframammary crease was necessary to achieve symmetry. There were two complications in two patients: In one patient a staphylococcal infection developed in the breast pocket after a traumatic hematoma that occurred 2 weeks after surgery. Another patient required implant exchange for a smaller one to achieve better symmetry. Nipple sensation was not affected adversely by the surgery. Ultimately, all patients achieved acceptable symmetry and were satisfied with the results.     

Mastopexy: Modification of periwinkle shell operation. Ten years of experience

Degrees I and II ptosis and atrophy of the female breast can definitively be corrected by the modified periwinkle shell operation. More problematic are the long-term results after correction of a degree III condition, especially when silastic prostheses for augmentation have been used. The long-term results can be optimized by a combination of dermal and glandular mastopexy and mammary implants.     

Periareolar mastopexy with mammary implants

We present our experience with using a periareolar mastopexy technique combined with prosthesis implantation to correct mammary ptosis, misplaced areolas, and tuberous hypoplastic breasts. We draw a circle around the areola and deepidermize the skin between them. We enter the glandular tissue and introduce the implant in a submuscular pocket. A purse string suture of nonabsorbable material is used to gather the excess skin. Results were satisfactory in all cases. During the immediate postoperative weeks the shape was flatter and protruded less, but a progressive correction was observed. The tuberous breast could be released and reshaped adequately. Misplaced areolas can also be replaced correctly by drawing the periareolar circle and ellipse in eccentric forms. This technique does not allow great elevation of the areola (no more than 4–5 cm), but it is good and safe for correcting minor to moderate ptosis combined with volume augmentation.     

A classification and algorithm for treatment of breast ptosis

Background: The Regnault classification of breast ptosis is insufficient for determining surgical strategies for different stages of ptosis. Objective: A new clinical classification of breast ptosis is proposed that allows greater precision in the development of an appropriate surgical plan. Methods: Breast ptosis is classified in 1-cm stages, beginning with stage A at 2 cm above the inframammary crease and continuing through stage E at 2 cm below the inframammary crease, with any level of ptosis beyond stage E defined as stage F. Increments of 1 cm were chosen because each level predicts a different amount of skin excision necessary to elevate the nipple-areolar complex to an ideal aesthetic level. An algorithm is provided for defining options for surgical management of the ptotic breast with and without augmentation and for the previously augmented breast. Results: Seventy-three cases of breast ptosis were treated with augmentation mammaplasty, simultaneous areolar mastopexy breast augmentation, Wise mastopexy breast augmentation, and other procedures following the proposed classification system and treatment algorithm. Conclusions: The new system for staging of breast ptosis is simple and easy to remember and can assist in the planning and evaluation of surgery. (Aesthetic Surg J 2002;22:355-363.)     

改良双环法乳房悬吊术

目的 介绍改良双环法行乳房悬吊术的方法和经验。方法 采用传统的双环法乳房悬吊术切口，在皮肤与乳腺的腺体表面之间行广泛剥离后。在乳腺的下半象限正中将腺体垂直切开，将形成的两部分乳腺复合组织瓣向内上及外上方向旋转后互相交叉重叠缝合固定成形。并将乳晕内外环的真皮行荷包缝合。术后将乳房塑形包扎。结果 采用本方法矫治轻、中度乳房下垂者共8例16侧。术后乳房外形美观持久，乳头、乳晕感觉良好，效果满意。结论 本手术方法简便易行．组织损伤小．瘢痕不明显．是矫治轻、中度乳房下垂的一种比较理想的方法。     

Breast autoaugmentation

A technique using a posteriorly based dermoglandular flap as an augmentation of the superior hemisphere of the breast combined with a periareolar mastopexy and vertical mastopexy is presented. The advantages of combining a periareolar mastopexy, in terms of reducing the length of the vertical scar and preventing areolar distortion, are explained.     

Radial Plication in Concentric Mastopexy

Concentric mastopexy presents many challenges to the plastic surgeon, especially when breast augmentation is part of the treatment plan. Radial plication is a reproducible and accurate technique for elevating the nipple–areolar complex and shaping the breast mound. Patient selection is important to the success of the radial plication procedure and concentric mastopexy in general. Although most surgeons agree that patients with smaller degrees of nipple ptosis and smaller breasts have better results than patients with greater degrees of nipple ptosis and larger breasts, there has never been an algorithm for patient selection. Regnault’s classification of breast ptosis addresses the degree of nipple ptosis, but no consideration is given to breast volume. Radial placation proved to be a valuable tool in the treatment of 87 patients undergoing concentric mastopexy in the author’s practice over the past 30 months. An algorithm addressing degrees of breast ptosis and breast volume is provided. The plastic surgeon can anticipate gratifying results if the algorithm provided is incorporated into his or her patient selection for concentric mastopexy. The concentric mastopexy technique is similar to the tailor tack procedure for standard mastopexy, allowing the plastic surgeon to mold and shape the breast before making a critical incision.     

Simultaneous Augmentation Mastopexy: A Technique for Maximum En Bloc Skin Resection Using the Inverted-T Pattern Regardless of Implant Size,Asymmetry, or Ptosis

Background

Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy for moderately to severely ptotic breasts presents the challenge of determining how much excess skin should be removed after implant placement to create symmetry and provide for maximal skin tightening without compromising tissue vascularization.

Methods

Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy involves invagination and tailor tacking of the excess skin after implant placement and then making a pattern around the tailor-tacked tissues for previsualization of the total area to be resected. This contrasts with first making a pattern for the mastopexy, resecting the skin, and then tailor tacking the tissues together. Over a 7-year period, 55 women had simultaneous augmentation mastopexy with this approach. Saline implants were placed in the subpectoral dual-plane position before the mastopexy was started. All surgeries were performed with the patient under general anesthesia, and the patients were discharged the same day. In a retrospective chart review, breast implant size, degree of preoperative asymmetry, length of procedure, and complications were recorded. The patient follow-up period ranged from 3 months to 7 years (median, 9 months).

Results

Symmetric, aesthetic results were achieved for all the patients. The range of saline implants used was 375–775 ml (average, 500 ml). Of the 55 women, 15 had two different size implants measuring at least 50 ml or larger, with the greatest size disparity in a patient being 225 ml (left breast, 700 ml; right breast, 475 ml). Six of the patients (10.9%) had small areas that healed by secondary intention, occurring mostly at the inferior junction of the inverted T. Only two patients (3.6%) had recurrence of breast ptosis, and only one patient (1.8%) had a mildly hypertrophic scar. There were no incidences of hematoma, infection, rippling, malposition of the nipple–areolar complex (NAC), NAC loss, capsular contraction, implant malposition, or dissatisfaction with implant size. The bilateral augmentation/mastopexy surgery time ranged from 2 h and 29 min to 4 h and 30 min (average, 3 h and 8 min).

Conclusions

The described technique maximizes the amount of tissue to be resected in simultaneous augmentation mastopexy for moderately to severely ptotic breasts. Symmetry is more easily achieved with this approach regardless of the implant size used or the amount of skin to be resected. This technique minimizes the chance of tissue necrosis from devascularized skin edges. It also may shorten the inverted T scar and reduce the operative time.

     

Mastopexy with autologous augmentation after massive weight loss: the intercostal artery perforator (ICAP) flap

The reconstruction of breast and upper-body deformities in massive weight loss (MWL) patients presents specific challenges to the plastic surgeon. In addition to significant breast ptosis and loss of breast volume, bariatric patients also have excessive lateral axillary and posterior truncal tissue that may require dermolipectomy for correction. A wise-pattern mastopexy was designed with a pedicled fasciocutaneous flap based on the intercostal artery perforators (ICAP) to correct breast ptosis, to restore breast volume, and to eliminate redundant upper truncal tissue. Five MWL patients underwent mastopexy with ICAP flap augmentation. All patients had stable and esthetically pleasing results 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. There were no complications of infection, wound dehiscence, seroma, or hematoma. Furthermore, there was no evidence of flap loss or tissue necrosis. Mastopexy with autologous augmentation using the ICAP flap was found to be a reliable method of breast reconstruction in the MWL patient.     

Extended Crescent Mastopexy with Augmentation

Problems with periareola or circumareolar mastopexy procedures include areola spreading, hypertrophic scar, and recurrence of the ptosis largely because of tension on the closure. To minimize this tension associated with a conventional crescent mastopexy procedure, the authors modified the operation by excising parenchyma with the crescent of skin as well as two small triangles of parenchyma on either side of the areola. Implant augmentation was performed at the same time. The described operation is indicated for patients who have a small to moderate amount of ptosis. The best candidate is the patient whose areola–inframammary distance is not excessive. Nine such patients received this “extended crescent mastopexy with augmentation” and were followed for up to 3 years. Areola spreading and hypertrophic scar were kept to a minimum. Although not the final answer for ptosis patients, the extended crescent mastopexy with augmentation has been a step in the right direction.     

Combined superior crescentic total glandular augmentation mastopexy: report of 37 cases

Methods of periareolar, donut, or crescentic patterns for augmentation mastopexy in mild to moderate ptosis cases are minimally invasive (short scar) options. In this article, we report a modified version of the classical crescentic technique of augmentation mastopexy, namely, “superior crescentic total glandular augmentation mastopexy”. Thirty-seven patients with (a) breasts having mild to moderate ptosis (Regnault grades I–II), (b) breasts requiring less than 3 cm of nipple–areola elevation, and (c) mild skin elasticity were included in the study. During surgery, the mean size of 290 cc of silicon gel-filled implants were placed. The mean follow-up was 39 months ranging from 6 and 58 months. None of the patients had disastrous complications such as skin or nipple–areola necrosis. Poor scar healing and areolar asymmetry were the main problems encountered during follow-up. Ptosis recurrence (n = 1), and capsular contracture (n = 1) were the main reasons for revision surgery (5.4%). Five patients were re-operated on due to complications and implant change requirements (13.5% , total revisions). Mean suprasternal notch–nipple distance was recorded as 20.8 cm (19.3–22.4 cm) postoperatively. After an average time of 39 months, this distance was found to be 21.2 cm (20.1–23.2 cm) (the case with the recurrent ptosis was excluded). Superior crescentic total glandular augmentation mastopexy has yielded satisfactory results in patients with mild to moderate breast ptosis; therefore, it seems to be a valuable option in terms of minimally invasive augmentation mastopexy techniques.     

The correction of breast ptosis with the expander mammary prosthesis

The major disadvantage of breast ptosis correction using the standard mastopexy procedure is the visible scarring. The use of an implant alone is often inadequate, especially in the more ptotic breast. A technique employing a submuscular expandable mammary prosthesis together with release of the breast tissue from the underlying muscle is described. This method enables correction of greater degrees of ptosis than is possible with implant placement alone.     

“Tear-Drop Augmentation Mastopexy”: A Technique to Augment Superior Pole Hollow

Breast ptosis classification systems focus on the inferior descent of the nipple, as well as the descent and distribution of the breast parenchyma below the inframammary fold. Common problems, such as development of a superior pole hollow and an excessive width of the superior pole, extending into the axilla, are not addressed. Few procedures specifically address these deficiencies, and even less information is available in terms of preventative maneuvers when augmentation is desired as an adjunct. Round implants worsen the problem by creating a superior pole shelf, and anatomic implants are unreliable alternatives. Here, we present a technique—tear-drop augmentation mastopexy—that addresses superior pole hollow, excess superior pole width, as well as breast ptosis and hypomastia. Patients with moderate to severe breast ptosis (Regnaults classification), tubular breast deformity, and deformities secondary to previous breast surgery are included in the study. Skin is deepithelialized through a circumareolar incision, and a skin-fat flap is elevated completely encircling the breast. A 2-cm area of parenchyma is left attached to the skin in the lower half of the breast. Breast parenchyma in the superior half of the breast is then advanced and plicated in a superiomedial direction to move the nipple areolar complex to the desired new position. Care is taken to redefine the pectoralis major muscle at its axillary border. A 3-cm incision is then placed in the inferior part of the parenchyma at the 6 oclock position to create a subpectoral pocket for placement of the implant. The tunnel is then closed to separate the implant pocket from the subcutaneous dissection. Residual dermal flap is used to define, and add durability to the parenchyma reshaping procedure. A 3-0 mersiline (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) blocking suture is used for a uniform circumareolar skin closure. Patients (n:35), ages 17–48, underwent tear-drop augmentation mastopexy between January 1999 and September 2002 for correction of the breast ptosis, tubular breast deformity, and deformities secondary to previous aesthetic breast surgery. The average follow-up was 2 years. All patients displayed type 1 or 2 (Baker classification) capsules. One subcutaneous hematoma and one subcutaneous seroma were seen, which were both treated by percutaneous aspiration. No submuscular hematomas, infections, skin or nipple losses, or hypertrophic scars were noted. Patient satisfaction was high. A more natural tear-drop breast shape was created with an improvement in the superior pole hollow and narrowing of the superior breast. The smallest breasts did not benefit from this technique for elimination of the superior pole shelf, as correction was proportional to the amount of breast tissue available for superior advancement. The tear-drop augmentation mastopexy is a novel technique for correction of the breast ptosis with augmentation, avoiding problematic development of superior pole hollow and excess superior width. This technique is also well applied to tubular breast deformity as well as to secondary breast procedures. Long-term follow-up demonstrates a safe and reproducible result with high patient satisfaction. This technique may solve several problems associated with breast ptosis surgery, which before were not specifically addressed, and the technique warrants further investigation.     

真皮乳腺组织瓣悬吊纠正乳房下垂

目的 应用真皮乳腺组织瓣悬吊纠正乳房下垂.方法 本组共6例乳房下垂病人,采用乳晕周围双环切口,在新乳标记点处斜向下方切开腺体组织使乳房下部形成包含双环之间真皮的乳腺组织瓣,将组织瓣向上牵拉覆盖乳腺上部并悬吊固定于胸肌筋膜.组织瓣切取根据乳房下垂程度及组织量多少而定,同时要确保组织瓣血液循环.结果 6例病人均获得满意的乳房外形.结论 该方法是目前比较理想的纠正乳房下垂的方法