The impact of gender and age matching for long-term graft survival in living donor renal transplantation

In renal transplantation, donor age and allograft size are known to have an important influence on the outcome of the graft reflecting functional renal mass. Women tend to have smaller kidneys with 17% fewer nephrons than male kidneys. The number of glomeruli per kidney as well as the mean glomerular volume closely correlate with kidney weight and negatively correlate with subject age. We evaluated the impact of gender and age matching in living-donor renal transplantation on long-term graft survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups were discerned among 614 renal transplants, according to donor and recipient gender: Group 1 was male donor to male recipient; Group 2 was male donor to female recipient; Group 3 was female donor to male recipient; and Group 4 was female donor to female recipient. We analyzed long-term graft survival and risk factors between the four groups as well as according to age matching. Statistical significance was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test (P < .05). RESULT: The graft survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 92.62%, 88.13%, 82.37%, and 76.07%, respectively. The risk factors affecting long-term graft survival were donor age, donor gender, acute rejection rate, and HLA-DR matching. Among the four groups, the graft survival rates of Group 3 (female donor to male recipient) were significantly different from the other groups (P = .0165). Also, the long-term graft survival rates according to age differences were significantly different between older donors than recipients and younger donors than recipients in each group (P = .0213). CONCLUSION: The importance of inadequate renal mass is magnified in high-risk recipients. Age matching could perhaps improve the results of transplantation, particularly when kidneys from older donors are used. Consideration of age and gender as criteria for the choice of donors and recipients may be considered in organ allocation.     

The impact of donor and recipient age on the outcome of kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: As survival has improved in the general population over the last few decades, the age of patients participating in renal transplantation has also increased. This study sought to investigate the impact of donor and recipient age as predictors of long-term graft survival in renal transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed transplantation outcomes in 598 patients who received renal transplants from 1979 to 2002. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to their age at renal transplantation. Group A (donor age <50 years, recipient age >50 years, n = 19/3.2%); group B (donor age >50 years, recipient age <50 years, n = 153/25.5%); group C (donor age <50 years, recipient age >50 years, n = 69/11.6%), and group D (donor age <50 years, recipient age <50 years, n = 357/59.8%). Univariate analysis to assess the effect of donor and recipient age as predictor factors of graft outcome was complimented by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods to assess graft survival with P < 1.05 considered significant. RESULTS: In the elderly donor group, graft survival was 92.8% at 1 year and 85.6% at 3 years; in the younger donor group, they were 93.4% and 90.2%, respectively, a difference that was statistically significant (P = .02). Univariate analysis of age factors showed a significant reduction in graft survival among recipients who received kidneys transplants from donors older than 50 years, although recipient age >50 years was not found to be an independent risk factor. The incidence of acute rejection was 24.6% in the elderly donor group and 23.5% in the younger donor group (P = not significant). Among the 4 groups, the best result was group D with 1-year and 3-year graft survival rates of 93.3% and 90.5%, respectively, but this result was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: These results may help the design for transplantation strategies for kidneys procured from elderly donors and for allocation to elderly recipients.     

The effect of donor gender on graft survival

Differences in actuarial graft survival according to donor gender have been reported for renal allografts and for cardiac and hepatic allografts, but for the latter in small series with limited biostatistical power. Using the large database of the Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS), this study is an evaluation of graft survival according to donor and recipient gender for renal (n = 124,911), cardiac (n = 25,432), and hepatic (n = 16,410) transplants. Confounders, such as calendar year, geographical area, race, donor and recipient age, HLA mismatch, cold ischemia time, and others, as well as interaction terms were taken into consideration. Death-censored actuarial renal allograft survival from female compared with male donors was less in female recipients and even more so in male recipients. The donor gender-associated risk ratio for graft loss was 1.15 in female recipients and 1.22 in male recipients. The age-gender interaction term was statistically significant, the gender effect being more pronounced for younger (16 to 45 yr) compared with older (>45 yr) donors. Serum creatinine concentrations 1 yr after transplantation were also higher for recipients with kidney grafts coming from female donors irrespective of recipient gender. For first cardiac transplants, graft survival was inferior when the donor was female and the recipient male, but no statistical difference according to donor gender was demonstrable in female recipients. For first hepatic transplants overall, no significant differences according to donor gender were noted. The proportion of recipients who had treatment for rejection crisis during the first year was higher for male recipients of kidneys from female donors compared with male donors. No difference according to donor gender was demonstrable in female recipients. For cardiac and hepatic grafts, no significant effect of donor gender on the proportion of patients treated for rejection episodes was noted. The data show that adverse effects of female donor gender for different organs is much less uniform than reported in the past. An important confounder is donor age. A gender effect on graft survival is also observed for cardiac allografts. Therefore, in addition to potential "nephron underdosing," further pathomechanisms must play a role, possibly differences in immunogenicity according to donor gender.     

Living donor kidney transplantation: the effects of donor age and gender on short- and long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND: The influence of donor age and sex on acute rejection episodes and short- and long-term graft survival in living donor (LD) kidney transplantation has not been well characterized. METHODS: This prospective cohort study includes 739 first time LD transplantations with median follow-up time of 55.1 months. Death censored graft survival according to donor age and sex was compared with Kaplan-Meier plots. Cox regression was performed to estimate the association between different risk factors and graft survival and acute rejection episodes. RESULTS: Graft survival was not affected by donor age above 50 years as long as these recipients did not experience an early acute rejection episode. Acute rejection episodes increased in recipients of grafts from donors > or =65 years (P=0.009). Donor age > or =65, recipient age less than 50 years, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR matching, and female donor gender were risk factors for early acute rejection episodes. In multivariate analysis donor age > or =65 years was a risk factor for graft loss in all time periods after transplantation. During the first 5 years after transplantation a steroid resistant rejection episode was an additional risk factor. More than 5 years after transplantation male donor gender was the only additional risk factor for graft loss. CONCLUSION: These results support the continued use of older male and female living donors who meet carefully constructed medical criteria and who are highly motivated to donate. Furthermore, donor age seems to be a more important predictor of graft loss than donor sex.     

Age-matching in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: So far, the combined influence of donor age and recipient age on renal allograft survival has not been investigated sufficiently. In this retrospective single-centre study we analysed whether the influence of donor age and recipient age on renal allograft survival are dependent on each other. METHODS: Data from 1269 cadaveric renal allograft transplantations were evaluated. Paediatric donors (<15 years) and paediatric recipients (<15 years) were excluded. Donors and recipients were divided by age: young donors (yd, 55 years, n=176), young recipients (yr, 55 years, n=211). Functional and actual long-term graft survival (8 years) within the four resulting groups was determined: yd/yr (n=926), yd/or (n=167), od/yr (n=132), and od/or (n=44). RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed that long-term graft survival of both, kidneys from young donors (functional, 66.1 vs 52.2%, P=0.004; actual, 53.3 vs 46.2%, P=0.065) and kidneys from old donors (functional, 68.7 vs 22.5%, P=0.07; actual, 57.1 vs 20.8%, P=0.15) was better in old recipients as compared to young recipients. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that actual graft survival of kidneys from old donors was significantly reduced in young recipients (od/yr) as compared to all other groups (P=0.001; RR, 1. 97; 95% CI, 1.32-2.94). In this group of patients, graft loss was mainly due to acute (33.7%) and chronic (24.0%) rejection. CONCLUSION: Transplantation of kidneys from 'old' donors into 'young' recipients should be avoided, and these kidneys should be given to age-matched recipients.     

Gender imbalance among donors in living kidney transplantation: the Norwegian experience.

BACKGROUND: In living donor (LD) kidney transplantation, a predominance of female-to-male donations has been observed. Gender demographics of living donors and outcomes of LD kidney transplantations in Norway were assessed, as this has not been explored previously. METHODS: Data from the Norwegian Renal Registry of first LD kidney transplantations (n = 1319) in the period 1985-2002 were used. RESULTS: The majority of all LD was female (57.8%; P<0.001), while 62.7% of the recipients were men (P<0.001). Females dominated as donors in the spousal group and the parental group (P<0.0001). However, no gender difference was observed in the parental group when the recipients were <30 years old (P = 0.65). In opposite-sex pairs, female-to-male donations were as expected based on the incidence of end-stage renal disease. Donor sex affected neither the incidence of acute rejections nor graft survival. Serum creatinine was higher in renal allografts from female donors to male recipients in the first 4 years after transplantation. Donor age also had significant impact on graft function measured as serum creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: Gender disparities in LD transplantation result from a higher proportion of female-to-female and a lower proportion of male-to-male donations than expected. Both donor age and donor sex influence graft function during the first years. Graft survival and acute rejection episodes appear not to be affected by donor sex in LD kidney transplantation.     

Male recipients of kidneys from female donors are at increased risk of graft loss from both rejection and technical failure

The aim of the present retrospective study was to uncover the factor(s) responsible for the poor outcome of cadaver kidney grafts from female donors in male recipients. The 741 transplantations performed at our center from August 1983 to September 1997 were distributed into four groups according to recipient and donor gender: female donor to female recipient (F to F: n = 117), male donor to female recipient (M to F: n = 172), female donor to male recipient (F to M: n = 170), and male donor to male recipient (M to M: n = 282). All the patients received immunosuppressive therapy based on corticosteroids and cyclosporine, associated or not with either azathioprine or prophylactic anti-lymphocyte globulin. Overall graft survival was lower in the F to M group than in the three other groups (p = 0.009). Failures due to rejection were more frequent during the 1st post-transplant trimester in female than in male donor grafts, irrespective of recipient gender (p = 0.025). All failures due to technical problems occurred during the first 3 months post-transplantation: they were more frequent in the F to M group than in the three other groups (p = 0.040): this could be related to the older age of the donors in the former group. After the first post-transplant year, failures due to causes other than rejection remained low in the F to F group but increased steadily in the three other groups (p = 0.007). Specific survival rates were not correlated with the time-evolution of mean serum creatinine values, daily doses and trough levels of cyclosporine in the four groups of grafts. In conclusion, the poor outcome of F to M grafts results from combined immunologic and technical factors exerting their effects early in the course of transplantation.     

Impact of Age Difference,Sex Matching,and Body Mass Index Matching Between Donor and Recipient in Renal Transplant

BackgroundVarious factors influence kidney transplant (KT) outcome. The impact of age difference between donor and recipient on long- and short-term graft and patient survival in living donor KT remains unclear.ObjectiveWe aim to determine whether age difference, sex matching, and body mass index (BMI) matching between donor and recipient affect the 12-month patient and graft survival in KT.MethodWe studied a retrospective cohort of 804 patients 18 years or older with primary KT from January 2010 to December 2014. Patient renal function and patient survival were followed up for 12 months post KT. Repeated analysis of variance measurement determined if there was a significant difference in the mean creatinine levels when the sample was grouped according to the matching groups for sex, age difference, and BMI classification. Odds ratios were computed to ascertain graft loss and graft rejection. Results were considered statistically significant if P < .05.ResultsMale donor–female recipient had the lowest creatinine levels over time compared with male donor–male recipient (P < .001) and female donor–male recipient (P < .001). Older donor–younger recipient with age difference of ≥ 15 years had the highest overall creatinine (P < .001). For BMI matching, a normal donor and an underweight recipient combination resulted in the lowest mean creatinine levels over the course of 12 months (P < .001). In terms of graft rejection, odds ratio was highest for a female donor and a male recipient (P < .00a) compared with a male donor and a female recipient. For graft loss, older donors (≥ 15 years) had the highest risk (P < .001) vs those older by 11 to 15 years.ConclusionThere was significant difference in the 12-month graft function of patients when grouped according to their matching for age difference, sex, and BMI. The risk for graft rejection increases when the combination for donor-recipient is female donor–male recipient. For graft loss, this is most significant for donors who are older by ≥ 15 years than their recipients.     

Age-matching improves the results of renal transplantation with older donors

Whilst HLA matching is routine for renal transplantation, the possible benefits of matching donor and recipient age have not been previously examined. In this study we examined the simultaneous effect of donor to recipient age difference on the graft survival of 141 consecutive first cadaver transplant recipients treated by cyclosporin immunosuppression. Multivariate regression analysis, taking into account other variables of moderately matched recipients (i.e. dialysis time and type, donor/recipient sex, local/imported kidneys, recent sensitivity, total ischaemic time, preoperative transfusions), indicated that age-difference was the single most important variable (P less than 0.05). Individually there was no significant effect of recipient age, whilst older donors (aged greater than 50 years) were associated with significantly worse graft survival than those younger (P less than 0.01). When dealing with donors aged greater than or equal to 50 years the corresponding recipient 1-year graft was improved when the donor was no more than 5 years older than the transplant recipient. Donor age to recipient age difference is a potentially important selection criterion in renal transplantation.     

Transplant recipient renal function is donor renal mass- and recipient gender-dependent.

The effect of both donor renal mass and gender on renal function, in both gender recipients, was examined. Qualifying consecutive living-donor renal transplants (n = 730) were stratified into 4 donor-recipient groups: female-female (n = 177), male-female (n = 151), female-male (n = 240), male-male (n = 162). Groups were equivalent in age, race, body mass index (BMI), match, ischemia time, operative time, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Female recipients had lower serum creatinine (Cr(s)). Male recipients had higher Cr(s) wherever they received a female allograft. Male recipients of male kidneys had a higher eGFR than all other groups for 3 years. Renal function of the recipient correlated with the renal mass of the donor within each group. Male and female kidneys functioned equivalently in the female-recipient environment. Large nephron-mass male donor kidneys function more poorly in female recipients. The male kidney loses 15-20 ml/min eGFR in the female host. The diminished graft function may be related to androgen deprivation. Female and male donor kidneys function equivalently in the male recipient if adjusted for renal mass transplanted. Female kidneys improve eGFR by 7-10 ml/min by being transplanted into a male environment. Donor renal mass and gender affect recipient graft function Expectations of ultimate recipient renal function should take into account both the gender and mass disparity of the donor-recipient pair.     

Improvement of kidney transplant regraft results by using trauma death donors

Patients who have lost a transplanted kidney are widely recognized as high-risk patients for retransplantation. We have found a profound difference in cadaver kidney regraft survival associated with the age and sex of the donor. Kidneys from male cadaver donors yielded significantly higher graft survival rates than kidneys from female donors. The difference in graft survival at one year was 7% for all first transplants (n = 2974), 14% if the recipient was sensitized, and 18% in 688 patients being regrafted. The difference was even more striking in regraft recipients of kidneys from young male donors (72% one-year graft survival) as compared with recipients of kidneys from older female donors (44% one-year graft survival). The donor age and sex effects correlated well with the cause of donor death. Young male donors accounted for 59% of trauma deaths whereas older female donors made up only 7%. Nontrauma donors, on the other hand, were 38% older female and 14% younger male. The survival of trauma-death donor kidneys in regrafted patients was 69% at one year and 37% for nontrauma donor kidneys, a 32% difference (P less than 0.001). These results indicate that regraft survival could be significantly increased through the use of cadaver kidneys from trauma death donors.     

The influence of donor age on initial and long-term renal allograft outcome

Abstract To investigate the impact of donor age on the immediate and long-term graft outcome, 808 primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients, transplanted between January 1983 and December 1992, were divided into six groups according to donor age: 10–19 years ( n = 142), 20–29 years ( n = 214), 30–39 years ( n = 136), 40–49 years ( n = 146), 50–59 years ( n = 142), 60–69 years ( n = 28). The six groups were comparable with regard to donor origin (local/ distant), serum creatinine, cold ischemia and reanastomosis time, recipient sex, degree of presensitiza-tion, number of pretransplant blood transfusions, number of HLA-B and B/DR mismatches. The incidence of delayed graft function was linearly correlated with increasing donor age, from 11.9% (donors 10–19 years) to 39.3% (donors 60–69 years) (P< 0.0001). Graft survival at 3 years was not influenced by donor age (from 89.3% for the youngest donors to 84.4% for donors 60–69 years). After the 3rd decade, the creatinine clearance linearly decreased with donor age (6.2ml/min, P<0.01). This progressive decline could not be attributed to the recipient age (-7 ml/decade for 485 recipients <50 years, and -6.1 ml/decade for 323 patients ≥ 50 years). Despite the decreased function in older kidneys, recipient renal function remained remarkably stable between 1 and 3 years after transplantation within each donor age group.     

Optimal use of older donors and recipients in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: The aging donor and recipient population have led to new challenges in kidney transplantation. The purpose of this study was to review retrospectively our single center experience in deceased-donor kidney transplantation, with respect to donor and recipient age. METHODS: From October 1, 2001, through February 20, 2004, we performed 144 deceased-donor kidney transplantations, which included 37 procedures (26%) in recipients > or =60 years old and 107 procedures (74%) in recipients 19 to 59 years old. The deceased-donor pool included 57 expanded criteria donors (ECD) and 87 standard criteria donors (defined as not ECD). ECD kidneys were used by matching estimated renal functional mass to recipient size (body mass index, <25 kg/m(2)), which included the use of dual kidney transplantations (n = 9). ECD kidney recipients were further selected on the basis of age >40 years and low immunologic risk. Recipients received rabbit antithymocyte globulin or alemtuzumab induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. RESULTS: The mean age differed between recipient groups (65 vs 46 years; P < .001). In recipients > or =60 years old, 23 recipients (62%) received kidney transplants from ECDs compared with 34 kidney transplants from ECDs (32%; P < .001) in recipients who were <60 years old. Patient survival was 89% in recipients who were > or =60 years old, compared with 95% in recipients who were <60 years old (P = .11), with a mean follow-up time of 27 months. Kidney graft survival rates were 84% in both recipient groups. Initial and subsequent graft function, rejection, infection, reoperation, length of stay, readmission, and resource use were similar among groups. CONCLUSION: By the matching of nephron mass with recipient size and avoiding the use of ECD kidneys in recipients with a high immunologic risk, short-term outcomes that are comparable with standard criteria donor kidneys in younger patients can be achieved with either older donors or recipients, regardless of age.     

Donor-recipient age difference - an independent risk factor in cyclosporin-treated renal transplant recipients

Abstract. Whilst HLA matching is routine in renal transplantation the possible benefits of matching donor to recipient age have not been previously explored. The simultaneous effect on graft survival of donor and recipient age was therefore investigated for 274 consecutive first cadaver transplant recipients treated by cyclosporin immunosuppression in two centres. The overall graft survival was 77%, and was not significantly different between the two centres. Individually there was no significant effect of donor or recipient age but taken together, the difference in age significantly affected graft survival ( P < 0.01) regardless of the mode of failure. The 1-year graft survival for all failures was 66.2% when the donor was 5 or more years older, 84.5% when the donor was 5 or more years younger and 71.7% when the donor was within 5 years of the recipient's age. Multivariate analysis, taking into account other variables (HLA matching, dialysis time and type, donor/recipient sex, local/imported kidneys, sensitivity, operation time, total ischaemic time, pre-operative transfusions) indicated that age difference was the single most important variable ( P <0.01). The only other important covariate risk factor in improving graft survival was HLA-DR matching ( P < 0.05). Donor-recipient age difference is a potentially important recipient selection criterion in cyclosporin-treated renal transplant patients.     

Effect of cold ischemic time and HLA matching in kidneys coming from "young" and "old" donors: do not leave for tomorrow what you can do tonight.

BACKGROUND: Kidneys from older donors are likely to have a lower nephron mass. Nevertheless they constitute a valuable source of kidney allografts. Long cold ischemic time (CIT), with or without delayed graft function (DGF), has been associated with reduced graft survival. The aim of this study was to review the experience of a single UK center to assess the interaction of cold storage time, donor age, organ exchange, and HLA-DR mismatching on short- and long-term survival. METHODS: We analyzed 788 first cadaver kidney transplants that were performed in our center from 1990 to 1997 and had complete data available. A donor age of 55 years was the cutoff age for "old" and "young" donor kidneys. The primary outcome measured was graft failure from any cause. RESULTS: There were 132 grafts from donors 55 years or older (16.7%), with 76.8% of the kidneys implanted after >20 hr of CIT. Kidney grafts from donors older than 55 years had worse graft survival than grafts from donors younger than 55 (87% vs. 78% at 1 year and 80% vs. 58% at 5 years after transplant, P=0.0001). A CIT of >20 hr significantly reduced graft survival (91% vs.74.3% at 5 years after transplant, P=0.0002) in the young donor group and was associated with an overall graft survival in the old donor group of 57.5% at 5 years. In the same group, ignoring the HLA-DR mismatching to achieve shorter CIT, the predicted initial cost on graft survival at 1 year would have been 3.7% but would have increased to 9% 5 years after transplant. For young donors a CIT of >20 hr had a cost of approximately 18% at 5-year graft survival, far higher than a single DR mismatch. Occurrence of DGF decreased survival in both short (P=0.001) and long (P=0.00001) CIT groups. CONCLUSION: Forming local alliances (common recipient lists) and minimizing delays within the hospital might reduce CIT and DGF while achieving excellent HLA matching. This should improve significantly the outcome of both old and young donor kidney grafts.     

Matching of the minor histocompatibility antigen HLA-A1/H-Y may improve prognosis in corneal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Minor histocompatibility (H) antigens are peptides of allelic intracellular proteins that play an important role in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched transplantations. In an animal model of keratoplasty, minor H antigens have even been reported to exceed the immunogenicity of major H antigens (MHC). This investigation is to assess any benefit of matching the broadly expressed gender (H-Y) and HA-3 antigens in HLA-A1 donor positive human keratoplasty. METHODS: A total of 229 HLA-A1 donor positive keratoplasties were analyzed. A Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were applied to estimate the effect of H-Y or HA-3 mismatches on rejection-free graft survival. RESULTS: Eighty-one cases were mismatched for H-Y (male donor to female recipient). A mean follow up of two years showed graft survival as high as 88% in the H-Y compatible group compared to only 77% in the H-Y mismatched group (P = 0.02). Eight out of 62 cases were mismatched for HA-3. No statistically significant influence of HA-3 matching on rejection-free graft survival was observed (85% vs. 73%, P=0.52). CONCLUSION: HLA-A1/H-Y matching and matching for other broadly expressed minor H antigens may further improve prognosis in keratoplasty.     

Renal transplantations performed using non-heart-beating organ donors: going back to the future?

BACKGROUND: As more expanded-criteria organ donors are used to bridge the widening gap between organ supply and demand, non-heart-beating (NHB) donors will become increasingly important. The purpose of this study was to analyze renal transplant outcomes using this source of cadaveric (CAD) organs and compare the results with heart-beating organ sources. METHODS: Data from 98,698 adult CAD renal transplant recipients and 34,531 living donor renal transplant recipients registered in the U. S. Renal Data System database between January 1993 and June 2000 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare graft and patient survival rates between NHB, CAD, and living donor transplant recipients. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors for NHB donor recipients, while adjusting for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Recipients of NHB donor organs experienced nearly twice the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) compared with heart-beating donors (42.4% vs. 23.3%, respectively). NHB donor transplants experienced comparable allograft survival when compared with CAD transplants at 6 years (73.2% vs. 72.5%, respectively; P=NS); patient survival was greater at 6 years for NHB compared with CAD renal transplant recipients (80.9% vs. 77.8%, respectively; P=NS). Significant factors for allograft loss for NHB donor organ recipients included the following: organ used for repeat transplants; DGF; donor age older than 35 years; and head trauma as a cause of initial injury (relative risk 2.74, 1.90, 1.78, and 1.41, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although exhibiting elevated DGF rates, allograft and patient survival rates of transplants from NHB donor sources are equivalent to those from conventional CAD sources. Donor age, recipient transplant number, female recipient, mechanism of injury, and DGF were the most pertinent variables leading to poor outcomes.     

Impact of Recipient and Donor Nonimmunologic Factors on the Outcome of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

Objective

To study the influence of nonimmunologic factors on the outcome of extended criteria deceased donor (DD) kidney transplants.

Method

This is a retrospective study of DD transplantation carried out from January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2007, to investigate the impact on graft survival and function of donor renal function at retrieval, cold ischemia time (CIT), delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection episodes (ARE), age, and weight of donors and recipients, transplant center activities, cause of donor death, donor-recipient gender pairing and size of the donating intensive care unit (ICU).

Results

At retrieval, the frequency of donors with a creatinine clearance <60 mL/min, using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and age >40 years were 31.7% and 32%, respectively. CIT > 24 hours, DGF, and ARE occurred in 27.1%, 33.4%, and 16.5% of cases, respectively. The overall 1- and 5-year graft and patient survival rates were 88% and 79.8% and 96.6% and 92.3%, respectively. The graft function was inferior with occurrences of ARE (P = .0001), DGF (P = .0001), CIT > 20 hours (P = .005), nontraumatic the donor death (P = .022), and donor ICUs bed capacity <20 (P = .03). The odds ratio (OR) for graft loss with DGF, ARE, and donors right kidneys were 7.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6-13.4; P = .0001), 4.47 (95% CI, 2.6-7.6; P = .0001) and 1.7 (95% CI, 1-2.8; P = .045), respectively. Graft function was not influenced by donor renal function at retrieval, donor weight, or donor- recipient gender pairings.

Conclusion

CIT and ARE had an impact on both graft survival and function. DGF and cerebrovascular accidents as the cause of donor death negatively affected graft function during follow-up. ICU center experience had a positive impact on graft survival. Patient survival was affected by recipient age >50 years and female to male donation versus other gender pairings. Neither donor age nor acute terminal rise in the donor serum creatinine affected graft function or survival, or patient mortality.     

The impact of donor variables on the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatitis C

Morphologic characteristics of the graft have been proposed as a major contributor to the long-term outcomes in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Our objective was to determine the impact of donor variables, including donor age, donor-recipient HLA match, and type of donation (DCD vs donation after brain death [DBD]), on the outcome of OLT in 192 patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Fourteen patients underwent OLT from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors and 188 from DBD donors. Mean donor age, warm ischemia time at recovery, and cold ischemia time were similar between the groups. Overall graft survival rate at 1 year (55% DCD vs 85% DBD) and 5 years (46% DCD vs 78% DBD) was significantly lower in the DCD group (P = .0003). Similarly, patient survival rate at 1 year (62% DCD vs 93% DBD) and 5 years (62% DCD vs 82% DBD) was significantly lower in the DCD group (P = .0295). Incidences of hepatic artery thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, and primary nonfunction were similar between the DCD and DBD groups. The incidence of liver abscess with ischemic-type biliary stricture was higher in recipients from DCD as compared with DBD (42% vs 2%). A trend toward lower graft survival was noted in recipients from donors older than 60 years of age in the HCV population (P = .07), with statistically lower patient survival (P = .02). Donor- recipient HLA matching did not appear to correlate with OLT outcome in patients with HCV. DCD donors and donors older than 60 years of age significantly impact patient and graft survival. Lower graft and patient survival in recipients from DCD donors does not appear to be related to early disease recurrence.     

Transplantation of single pediatric kidneys into adult recipients

AIM: To evaluate the outcome of single pediatric kidneys transplanted into adult recipients. METHODS: A retrospective single-center review was performed of transplants from donors less than 5 years of age. Outcomes were compared with recipients of grafts from donors 18 to 45 years transplanted during the same time period. RESULTS: Thirty single renal transplants from pediatric donors and 117 transplants from adult donors between 18 and 45 years of age were performed during the study period. The mean age of the pediatric donors was 2.9 +/- 0.8 years versus 31.5 +/- 8.9 years for adult donors (P < .001). The mean age of the recipients of pediatric donors was 41.9 +/- 13 years versus 48 +/- 12.6 years for recipients of adult grafts (P = .020). The mean recipient weight of pediatric donors was 55.9 +/- 7.8 kg versus 78.0 +/- 17.7 kg for recipients of adult donors (P < .001). Sixty-six percent of pediatric donor recipients were of female gender compared to only 36% of adult donor recipients (P = .005). Death-censored actuarial graft survivals at 1 and 4 years for recipients of pediatric donor grafts were 90% and 85% compared to 93% and 85% for recipients of adult donor grafts (P = NS). The mean calculated creatinine clearances of adult donor graft recipients at 1 and 4 years posttransplantation were 70.8 +/- 26.5 and 73.7 +/- 27.2 mL/min, respectively, compared to 50.3 +/- 20.1 and 56.3 +/- 21.4 mL/min for pediatric donor grafts (P < .01 at 1 and 4 years). CONCLUSION: The use of single pediatric donor kidneys provides an excellent opportunity to safely expand the donor pool.