E-cadherin nuclear staining is useful for the diagnosis of ovarian adult granulosa cell tumor

We recently have demonstrated nuclear localization of E-cadherin in ovarian adult granulosa cell tumors (Histopathology 2011;58:423). The purpose of the present study is to investigate the diagnostic utility of E-cadherin nuclear staining for the differential diagnosis between ovarian adult granulosa cell tumor and its morphological mimics. Tissue samples taken from 81 ovarian tumors and 20 extraovarian tumors were immunohistochemically stained using monoclonal anti-E-cadherin antibody recognizing cytoplasmic domain (clone 36 supplied by BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). The ovarian tumors consisted of 30 adult granulosa cell tumors, 3 Sertoli-stromal cell tumors, 14 fibrothecomas, 5 carcinoid tumors, 1 large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, 18 endometrioid adenocarcinomas, and 10 poorly differentiated serous adenocarcinomas. Extraovarian tumors consisted of 16 uterine endometrial stromal neoplasms and 4 pulmonary small cell carcinomas. Only tumor cells with nuclear staining were considered positive in this study. Ninety percent of adult granulosa cell tumors, 67% of Sertoli-stromal cell tumors, 64% of fibrothecomas, 75% of endometrial stromal neoplasms, 75% of small cell carcinomas, and the one large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma showed E-cadherin nuclear expression, whereas all the ovarian carcinoid tumors, endometrioid adenocarcinomas, and poorly differentiated serous adenocarcinomas were negative. E-cadherin nuclear staining is useful in distinguishing between adult granulosa cell tumors and ovarian adenocarcinomas or carcinoid tumors. However, it is of limited use for distinguishing between adult granulosa cell tumors and endometrial stromal neoplasms or small cell carcinomas. E-cadherin should be included in the immunohistochemical panel for an accurate diagnosis of ovarian adult granulosa cell tumors.     

Association of E-cadherin and beta-catenin immunoexpression with clinicopathologic features in primary ovarian carcinomas

Epithelial cadherin forms a complex with alpha-, beta-, and gamma-catenin proteins. Reduced expression of E-cadherin-catenins has been shown in human carcinomas and is associated with low histologic differentiation, increased risk of invasion, and metastatic disease. The immunoexpression pattern of E-cadherin and beta-catenin (reduced versus preserved phenotype) was evaluated in 104 primary ovarian carcinomas and related to clinicopathologic features of the tumors. The immunoexpression pattern of E-cadherin was associated with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging (P = 0.043), histologic subtype (P = 0.001), peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.006), and residual tumor (P = 0.036). The reduced phenotype of E-cadherin that was observed in 64% of the carcinomas (67/104) was associated with advanced stage tumors, serous carcinomas, presence of peritoneal metastasis, and residual tumor larger than 2 cm. The immunoexpression pattern of beta-catenin was associated with histologic subtype (P = 0.005), tumor differentiation (P = 0.025), and peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.041). The reduced phenotype of beta-catenin that was observed in 74% of the carcinomas (77/104) was associated with advanced stage tumors, poorly differentiated serous and clear cell carcinomas, presence of peritoneal metastasis, and residual tumor. The immunoexpression pattern of E-cadherin was correlated with beta-catenin (P = 0.001). The reduced phenotype for both E-cadherin and beta-catenin was associated with histologic subtype (P < 0.001) and peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.001). In conclusion, the immunohistochemical profile of E-cadherin and beta-catenin may be useful in identifying a particular subpopulation of ovarian cancer patients who are characterized by an adverse clinical outcome, because the reduced phenotype of these molecules was associated with poor tumor differentiation, peritoneal metastasis, and advanced FIGO stage tumors.     

Expression of E-cadherin and alpha-, beta-, gamma-catenin proteins in endometrial carcinoma

Loss of the cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin is suggested to promote tumor invasion and distant metastasis in tumor development. Recently, it has been proposed that E-cadherin function requires its linkage to the cytoskeleton through catenins. We evaluated the expression of E-cadherin and alpha-, beta-, gamma-catenins in tissues of human endometrial carcinoma, analyzed the patterns of cell adhesion molecules' expression in endometrial carcinoma and investigated the relationship between the statuses of cell adhesion molecules and various clinicopathological factors. This study investigated the immunohistochemical expression of E-cadherin and alpha-, beta-, gamma-catenins in 33 paraffin embedded formalin fixed tissues of endometrial carcinomas. Aberrant E-cadherin, and alpha-, beta-, gamma-catenin expression was observed in 33.3 (11 of 33), 27.3 (9 of 33), 18.2 (6 of 33), and 51.5 (17 of 33) % of the specimens, respectively. Statistically significant correlation was found between aberrant expression of E-cadherin and lymph node metastasis and cell types other than endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Aberrant pattern of gamma-catenin expression was also correlated with deep myometrial invasion. However, alpha-, and beta-catenin expression was not correlated with any clinicopathological parameters. Using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank comparison test, abnormal expression of E-cadherin was correlated closely with poor survival (p < 0.05), but cases with loss of both E-cadherin and catenin expression predicted even poorer survival than cases with only one or no aberrant expression in E-cadherin and catenins. We revealed aberrant expression of these cell adhesion molecules among patients with endometrial carcinoma. Aberrant expression of E-cadherin was correlated with lymph node metastasis and cell types other than endometrioid adenocarcinoma, while aberrant expression of gamma-catenin was related with deep myometrial invasion. The expression of E-cadherin might be a possible prognostic factor for endometrial cancer while the expression of catenins may help predict patient's survival.     

β- And γ-catenin expression in endometrial carcinoma. Relationship with clinicopathological features and microsatellite instability

The activation of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)/beta-catenin/T-cell factor (Tcf) pathway due to beta-catenin gene mutation has been recently implicated in the development of some endometrial carcinomas. beta- and gamma-catenin are structurally and functionally related molecules that participate in cell adhesion and signal transduction. Nuclear accumulation of beta- and gamma-catenin have been related to the activation of the APC/beta-catenin/Tcf pathway. In this study, we investigate the immunohistochemical expression pattern (nuclear vs membranous) of beta- and gamma-catenin in 40 endometrial carcinomas and their correlation with clinicopathological features and microsatellite instability (MI) status. MI was detected at three or more loci in 12 tumors: 11 were endometrioid and one was non-endometrioid. Nuclear catenin expression was found in 13 carcinomas: ten carcinomas had nuclear beta-catenin expression and three carcinomas had nuclear gamma-catenin expression. The nuclear catenin expression pattern significantly correlated with the histological type, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grade, and the presence of a second neoplasm. Nuclear catenin expression was always observed in low-grade endometrioid carcinomas; it was also more frequently associated with a second carcinoma. No correlation was observed between the catenin expression pattern and the level of myometrial infiltration, stage, associated endometrial hyperplasia, the existence of a source of estrogenic stimulation, and MI. However, four of 13 endometrioid carcinomas in this series had both catenin nuclear expression and MI. These data suggest that at least two different neoplastic pathways can lead to endometrial carcinomas with an endometrioid phenotype. In one, MI would be a key event, while in the other, the APC/beta-catenin/Tcf signaling pathways could be activated. Probably, in some cases, both pathways could simultaneously occur.     

Image cytometry DNA ploidy correlates with histological subtypes in endometrial carcinomas.

Image cytometric DNA ploidy analysis of endometrial carcinomas was performed to determine whether ploidy status and ploidy-related parameters like DNA index, percentage of cells exceeding 5c and 9c, correlate with histologic subtype. This is a prospective study of 391 patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma which included 331 (85%) endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 22 (6%) serous adenocarcinoma, 7 (2%) clear cell adenocarcinoma, 2 (0.5%) small cell carcinoma, 1 (0.3%) undifferentiated carcinoma, and 28 (7%) unclassifiable adenocarcinoma. Twenty-five percent of endometrioid adenocarcinomas were non-diploid. In contrast, all clear cell adenocarcinomas and 21/22 (95%) of serous adenocarcinomas were non-diploid. Hyperdiploidy (25 cases) was found only in endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Mean DNA index of the stemline in serous adenocarcinoma (1.72) and clear cell adenocarcinoma (1.81) was higher than in endometrioid adenocarcinoma (1.1). The difference in ploidy-related parameters between endometrioid adenocarcinoma and serous adenocarcinoma was highly significant (P<0.001). In addition, Grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma showed significant difference in all ploidy-related parameters compared with grade 1 and grade 2 tumors (P<0.001). Our results show that DNA ploidy-related parameters may be valuable in subtyping histologically difficult cases of endometrial carcinomas.     

Nuclear beta-catenin is a molecular feature of type I endometrial carcinoma

Two types of endometrial carcinoma can be distinguished: type I tumours, which are oestrogen-related and are typically low-grade endometrioid carcinomas; and type II tumours, which are unrelated to oestrogen stimulation and are often non-endometrioid carcinomas. The molecular abnormalities involved in carcinogenesis appear to be different for these tumour types. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that an abnormality in the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway is a molecular feature of type I endometrial carcinoma. This study investigated nuclear beta-catenin by immunohistochemistry in 233 endometrial carcinomas and analysed its correlation with several immunohistochemical, histological, and clinical parameters, such as proliferation rate (Ki-67), expression of oestrogen and progesterone receptors, and survival. Nuclear beta-catenin expression was observed in 39 cases (16%). All tumours expressing nuclear beta-catenin were endometrioid adenocarcinomas, were significantly better differentiated, and were more often hormone receptor-positive than tumours without nuclear beta-catenin. No correlation with proliferation rate was found. It was found that several features of type I endometrial carcinoma occur significantly more often in tumours expressing nuclear beta-catenin, suggesting that an abnormality in the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway, resulting in nuclear beta-catenin immunopositivity, is a molecular feature of a subset of type I endometrial carcinomas.     

Immunophenotypic diversity of endometrial adenocarcinomas: implications for differential diagnosis.

Many endometrial adenocarcinomas, particularly those of endometrioid type, express estrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PRs), and vimentin. This typical immunophenotype is frequently considered a standard against which others are compared when immunohistochemistry is used for differential diagnosis. We tested large numbers of endometrial cancers, enriched for high-grade tumors, to determine whether this reported immunophenotype was valid and whether expression differences between types of endometrial carcinoma could be exploited for diagnostic purposes. Immunohistochemical stains were performed on the following types of endometrial cancers using established methodology: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grades 1 and 2 endometrioid-42; FIGO grade 3 endometrioid-40; serous-24; clear cell-11; carcinosarcoma-9. In total, 92% of serous carcinomas expressed p16 strongly compared to weak-to-moderate expression of p16 in 7-67% of other tumors (FIGO grades 1 and 2 carcinoma and carcinosarcoma, respectively). A total of 84% of FIGO grades 1 and 2 carcinomas expressed ER compared to 9-54% of other tumors (clear cell and serous carcinomas respectively); 83% of FIGO grades 1 and 2 expressed PR compared to 11-54% of other carcinomas (carcinosarcoma and serous carcinoma, respectively). Most carcinomas were negative for monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (mCEA), and those that were positive showed mostly only focal membrane expression. Vimentin was expressed in nearly every tumor. Most tumors were diffusely vimentin positive, but a large range of expression patterns, from focal to diffuse and from weak to strong, was noted. Only 70% of FIGO grades 1 and 2 endometrioid carcinomas and 26% of grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas possessed the reportedly characteristic endometrial cancer immunophenotype p16 (-), ER (+), PR (+), mCEA (-), and vimentin (+). Endometrial cancers demonstrate substantial immunophenotypic diversity that remained apparent even within groups of similar histologic subtype and grade. ER, PR, and p16 expression was more illustrative of tumor type and degree of differentiation than they were of endometrial origin. In contrast, the vimentin-positive/CEA-negative phenotype remained the most constant among all endometrial cancers.     

cDNA microarray analysis and immunohistochemistry reveal a distinct molecular phenotype in serous endometrial cancer compared to endometrioid endometrial cancer

Purpose

The main objective of this study was to refine more precisely the gene expression patterns used to distinguish serous from endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

Methods

A low-density cDNA microarray containing 492 genes was designed and constructed. The gene expression profiles of 32 endometrioid and 5 serous endometrial cancer tissue samples were compared. The expression of 5 differentially expressed genes: NDC80, BUB1, FUT8, ANXA4 and BBC3 in endometrioid and serous adenocarcinoma samples was further evaluated by quantitative real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry.

Results

Unsupervised cluster analysis revealed that the 5 serous adenocarcinomas clustered together. These were separated from the endometrioid adenocarcinomas which were further sorted into 3 additional clusters. A comparative analysis indicated that there was a significant difference in FIGO stage with no significant difference in depth of myometrial invasion among the 4 clusters. The FIGO ternary grading system could not distinctly separate the 3 clusters of endometrioid adenocarcinomas, but a binary grading system was able to do so. Using a supervised analysis, we have identified 46 genes exhibiting > 2-fold differences that can be used to statistically differentiate serous adenocarcinomas from endometrioid adenocarcinomas. The directions of gene and protein expression change of five differentially expressed genes estimated by real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry are consistent with those estimated from microarray.

Conclusions

Serous adenocarcinoma exhibits distinct gene expression profiles, compared with those of endometrioid adenocarcinoma. These differences make it feasible to validate microarray data by immunohistochemistry, and they will ultimately allow us to identify tumors according to their immunohistochemical phenotype. The accuracy of classifying endometrial tumors using a system based on their gene expression patterns is much higher than the accuracy of the FIGO grading system. Thus, this gene expression pattern-based system may prove to be crucial in developing novel treatment strategies for endometrial cancers at the molecular level in future.     

β-Catenin Expression Pattern in Stage I and II Ovarian Carcinomas : Relationship with β-Catenin Gene Mutations, Clinicopathological Features, and Clinical Outcome

The immunohistochemical expression pattern of beta-catenin has been correlated with beta-catenin gene mutations, clinicopathological features, and disease outcome in 69 stage I and II ovarian carcinomas. beta-Catenin expression was localized in the nuclei, in addition to the cytoplasm and membrane, in 11 tumors (16%): nine endometrioid carcinomas with widespread nuclear expression and two serous carcinomas with focal nuclear expression. The remaining 58 carcinomas (84%) only had membranous beta-catenin expression. All but one of the endometrioid carcinomas with nuclear beta-catenin expression had considerable squamous metaplasia, and five of these cases had large areas of endometrioid tumor of low malignant potential. In addition, beta-catenin nuclear expression was observed in atypical epithelial cells in endometriotic glands adjacent to an endometrioid carcinoma. Sequencing was performed on 25 tumors and corresponding normal tissue: all 13 endometrioid tumors as well as 12 carcinomas of other histological types (four serous, two clear cell, two mucinous, and two mixed). There were oncogenic mutations in the phosphorylation sequence for GSK-3beta in exon 3 of the beta-catenin gene in seven endometrioid carcinomas with beta-catenin nuclear expression. Three mutations affected codon 32 (D32G, D32Y, and D32Y), one affected codon 33 (S33C), two affected codon 37 (S37C and S37F), and one affected codon 41 (T41A). No mutations were observed in the other 18 carcinomas analyzed, comprising two endometrioid and two serous carcinomas with beta-catenin nuclear expression, and 14 carcinomas of different histological types with only membranous expression. In the univariate and multivariate survival analyses, beta-catenin nuclear expression was selected as an indicator of good prognosis, because no patient whose tumor expressed beta-catenin in the nuclei showed relapses or died, in contrast to the 19 relapses and deaths among patients with tumors that only had beta-catenin membranous expression, including three of the four patients with endometrioid carcinomas. Oncogenic beta-catenin mutation is characteristic of a group of endometrioid carcinomas with a good prognosis, most of which originate from previous benign or borderline lesions. Endometrioid carcinomas with exclusively membranous expression of beta-catenin seem to represent a different subgroup of carcinomas that probably have a worse prognosis. In early-stage ovarian cancer, determination of the beta-catenin expression pattern could prove to be a useful marker for selecting low-risk patients.     

Expression of nm23 in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic endometrial tissues

This study evaluated the expression of nm23 in curettage specimens from 63 cases of normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic endometrial tissues by immunohistochemistry. The histological diagnoses were as follows: normal proliferative (N = 5) or secretory (N = 5), simple hyperplasia (N = 11), complex hyperplasia (N = 9), atypical hyperplasia (N = 8) and adenocarcinoma (N = 25), consisting of endometrioid adenocarcinoma (N = 15), clear cell (N = 7) and serous papillary adenocarcinoma (N = 3). There was no immunostaining for nm23 protein in the 10 cases of normal endometria and in the 28 cases of endometrial hyperplasia. In contrast, 52% of the adenocarcinomas displayed a cytoplasmic staining pattern which was moderate to strong. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0001, chi-square test). nm23 expression in curettage specimens had no predictive value for determining the FIGO stage in the hysterectomy specimens (p = 0.2709, chi-square test). No significant difference for nm23 immunoreactivity was found between the histologic subtypes of endometrial adenocarcinoma (endometrioid versus serous papillary and clear cell, p = 0.1413, chi-square test). In this study, there was no immunostaining of normal endometria or of endometrial hyperplasia (including atypical endometrial hyperplasia) to support the hypothesis that expression of the nm23 gene product is related to the development of endometrial adenocarcinoma. In contrast, nm23 expression was upregulated in many cases of endometrial adenocarcinomas irrespective of the histologic subtype.     

Grading gynäkologischer Tumoren

Histopathological assessment of the tumor grade and cell type is central to the management and prognosis of various gynecological malignancies. Conventional grading systems for squamous carcinomas and adenocarcinomas of the vulva, vagina and cervix are poorly defined. For endometrioid tumors of the female genital tract as well as for mucinous endometrial, ovarian and seromucinous ovarian carcinomas, the 3?tiered FIGO grading system is recommended. For uterine neuroendocrine tumors the grading system of the gastrointestinal counterparts has been adopted. Uterine leiomyosarcomas are not graded. Endometrial stromal sarcomas are divided into low and high grades, based on cellular morphology, immunohistochemical and molecular findings. A chemotherapy response score was established for chemotherapeutically treated high-grade serous pelvic cancer. For non-epithelial ovarian malignancies, only Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors and immature teratomas are graded. At this time molecular profiling has no impact on the grading of tumors of the female genital tract.     

Immunohistochemical alpha- and beta-catenin and E-cadherin expression and their clinicopathological significance in human lung adenocarcinoma

The E-cadherin/catenin complex (alpha-catenin, beta-catenin, and E-cadherin) plays a crucial role in cell-cell adhesion and tissue remodeling, and abnormalities in these molecules have been suggested to participate in the proliferation and invasive and metastatic potentials of several human carcinomas. However, in human lung adenocarcinomas, its importance has not yet been sufficiently investigated. We immunohistochemically examined the expressions of E-cadherin/catenin complex in 35 primary lung adenocarinomas, and evaluated their expressions in a semiquantitative manner. Correlations between these expression levels, MIB-1 and nuclear p53 indices, and clinicopathological factors were analyzed by subdividing the cases into high- and low-expression groups for each protein. The reduction in membranous E-cadherin/catenin complex expression correlated significantly with low-grade histological differentiation and with high MIB-1 index. Survival analyses were also performed to clarify which factors potentially affected the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma patients. The low expression of beta-catenin and the high MIB-1 index had a significantly unfavorable influence on the patients' survival. Moreover, the immunohistochemical expression of beta-catenin by cancer cells and MIB-1 index are considered useful prognostic factors for lung adenocarcinoma.     

Reduced E-cadherin expression as a cause of distinctive signet-ring cell variant in colorectal carcinoma

Colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a rare type of adenocarcinoma and presents with distinctive clinicopathological features. This study was performed to assess the biological characteristics of colorectal SRCC regarding the E-cadherin expression. Seventeen patients with primary colorectal SRCC were identified and their clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed. The mean age of the 17 patients was 45.3 yr (14-68). Immunohistochemical staining of E-cadherin and beta-catenin were performed in ten colorectal SRCCs and in 30 ordinary colorectal adenocarcinomas as control. Primary colorectal SRCC occurred in 0.7% of 2,388 colorectal adenocarcinomas. Most patients had advanced stage tumor at surgery (stage III and IV, AJCC: 82%). Five-year survival rate was 16%. Peritoneal seeding was the most common recurrence pattern (41%) and liver metastasis was not identified. All SRCCs showed a markedly reduced or absent expression of E-cadherin on immunohistochemical staining, whereas seven (23.3%) of ordinary carcinomas showed reduced expression, thereby indicating a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.005). In immunohistochemical staining for beta-catenin, eight of ten SRCCs showed reduced membrane expression that did not attain statistical significance compared to ordinary adenocarcinomas. It is suggested that aberrant E-cadherin expression may explain the distinct clinicopathological features in primary colorectal SRCC.     

Endometrial carcinomas: a review emphasizing overlapping and distinctive morphological and immunohistochemical features

This review focuses on the most common diagnostic pitfalls and helpful morphologic and immunohistochemical markers in the differential diagnosis between the different subtypes of endometrial carcinomas, including: (1) endometrioid versus serous glandular carcinoma, (2) papillary endometrioid (not otherwise specified, villoglandular and nonvillous variants) versus serous carcinoma, (3) endometrioid carcinoma with spindle cells, hyalinization, and heterologous components versus malignant mixed müllerian tumor, (4) high-grade endometrioid versus serous carcinoma, (5) high-grade endometrioid carcinoma versus dedifferentiated or undifferentiated carcinoma, (6) endometrioid carcinoma with clear cells versus clear cell carcinoma, (7) clear cell versus serous carcinoma, (8) undifferentiated versus neuroendocrine carcinoma, (9) carcinoma of mixed cell types versus carcinoma with ambiguous features or variant morphology, (10) Lynch syndrome-related endometrial carcinomas, (11) high-grade or undifferentiated carcinoma versus nonepithelial uterine tumors. As carcinomas in the endometrium are not always primary, this review also discusses the differential diagnosis between endometrial carcinomas and other gynecological malignancies such as endocervical (glandular) and ovarian/peritoneal serous carcinoma, as well as with extra-gynecologic metastases (mainly breast and colon).     

Genomic profile of endometrial tumors depends on morphological subtype,not on tamoxifen exposure

Tamoxifen has been a very effective treatment for breast cancer for several decades, however, at the same time increases the risk of endometrial cancer, especially after prolonged exposure. In addition, tamoxifen has been associated with a higher proportion of unfavorable uterine tumor subtypes (carcinosarcomas and serous adenocarcinomas) with worse survival. We investigated whether endometrial tumors, which developed after prolonged tamoxifen treatment for breast cancer, are genetically different from endometrial tumors without preceding tamoxifen exposure. Array CGH was used on archival formalin‐fixed paraffin embedded endometrial tumors to determine genomic aberrations. We compared the genomic profiles of 52 endometrial tumors from breast cancer patients after long‐term (≥2 years) tamoxifen use (endometrioid adenocarcinomas, n = 26; carcinosarcomas, n = 14; and serous adenocarcinomas, n = 12) with endometrial tumors from unexposed breast cancer patients (n = 45). Genomic profiles were correlated with tamoxifen exposure, tumor subtypes, and histopathological characteristics of the endometrial tumors. The common uterine corpus cancers of the endometrioid subtype show few genomic aberrations. Tumors with many genomic aberrations were in general ER‐negative. In contrast, carcinosarcomas and serous adenocarcinomas showed many aberrations; however, they were indistinguishable from each other. Tumors that developed after prolonged tamoxifen use did not show more or different aberrations than unexposed tumors. This was true for all tumor subtypes. Thus, endometrial carcinomas that develop after prolonged tamoxifen use cannot be distinguished from nonusers on basis of their tumor genomic profile. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Endometrial adenocarcinoma: beliefs and scepticism

The incidence of endometrial adenocarcinoma is high in North America and northern Europe, and low in Asia and Africa. This variance in frequency rates occurred in the late 1970s and its real cause has remained in question since. There is a widespread belief that endometrial adenocarcinomas associated with endometrial hyperplasia have a much better prognosis than those related to endometrial atrophy. This view is, in general terms, true but only because a high proportion of tumors arising from an atrophic endometrium are of serous/papillary, clear cell, or Grade 2-3 endometrioid carcinomas, in contrast to those developing from a hyperplastic endometrium, which are nearly all G1 endometrioid adenocarcinomas. These adenocarcinomas have, however, an excellent prognosis, no matter whether they are related to hyperplasia or atrophy, and taxonomically they form a single tumor group. In this regard, it is most reasonable to separate endometrial carcinomas into low- and high-grade tumors. The first are formed solely of G1 or "authentic" endometrioid adenocarcinomas, i.e., endometrioid neoplasms composed in their entirety of glandular elements without having traces of nonsquamous solid components. The high-grade tumors are formed of both endometrioid Grade 2-3 adenocarcinomas and nonendometrioid carcinomas-all of particularly aggressive behavior. The question of grading endometrioid adenocarcinomas in a precise and reproducible way becomes obvious. It is also believed that endometrial adenocarcinomas associated with endometrial hyperplasia are estrogen-primed, while those related to endometrial atrophy are deprived of hormonal stimulation. However, as we have shown in this laboratory recently, estrogen stimulation may be very common in endometrial neoplasms developing in an atrophic endometrium. For indeed most, if not all, postmenopausal atrophic endometria harboring adenocarcinomas contain actively proliferating glands, with high Ki-67 proliferation index, high epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activity, high microvessel density (MVD), and rich in estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PR), indicative of a continuous low-level estrogenic stimulation. That there is a number of endometrial carcinomas that tend to develop in a milieu of antiestrogenic domination, following treatment for breast carcinoma, this may well represent a form of breast-endometrial hereditary disease and, certainly, merits further investigation.     

Immunohistochemical study of the expression of adhesion molecules in ovarian serous neoplasms

To clarify possible roles of adhesion molecules including E-cadherin, beta- and gamma-catenin, CD44s, CD44v6, CD56, and CD99 in ovarian serous neoplasms, an immunohistochemical study was undertaken for 23 benign, 40 borderline, and 95 malignant ovarian serous neoplasms using tissue microarray (TMA). Significantly reduced expression of E-cadherin, and overexpression of CD44s, CD56, and CD99 were more frequently observed in adenocarcinomas than in benign and borderline tumors. Expression of CD44v6 and nuclear beta- and gamma-catenin were detected only in borderline tumors and adenocarcinomas. Reduced expression of E-cadherin was also correlated with high tumor grade (P=0.03), presence of peritoneal seeding (P=0.03), and low overall survival rate (P=0.02). Overexpression of CD44s was significantly associated with high tumor grade (P=0.04), advanced stage (P=0.03), and low overall survival rate (P=0.02). CD56 was increasingly expressed in the case of advanced stage (P=0.005) and peritoneal seeding (P=0.001). Nuclear staining for gamma-catenin was correlated with tumor progression (P=0.004) and advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (P=0.02). Only CD44s expression and stage were correlated with overall survival in multivariate study. These results suggest that although E-cadherin, CD44s, CD56, and nuclear gamma-catenin immuno-expression seem to be useful prognostic markers for serous neoplasm of the ovary, CD44s expression and FIGO stage are independent prognostic factors.     

Immunohistochemical profile of endometrial adenocarcinoma: a study of 61 cases and review of the literature.

The differences in immunohistochemical expression of p53, bcl-2, bax, estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR) were evaluated in 40 endometrioid and 21 papillary serous carcinomas of endometrium and correlated with known predictors of survival, such as grade and stage. Uterine papillary serous adenocarcinomas (UPSA) showed significantly higher p53 expression than did uterine endometrioid adenocarcinomas (UEA) (76.2% versus 35%), whereas both ER and PR were more often positive in endometrioid than in serous tumors (p = .005 and .0005). No significant difference was found in bcl-2 and bax expression between both histologic types. However, there was definite decrease in intensity of bcl-2 in UPSA compared with UEA. In endometrioid carcinoma, p53 overexpression was associated with high-grade and advanced-stage tumors (p = .0006 and .006), whereas ER and PR expression was associated with low-grade and early-stage tumors (p = .0006 and .0001; p = .003 and .0006). Bcl-2 immunopositivity was more common in low-grade, early-stage rather than in high-grade, advanced-stage adenocarcinomas, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = .24 and .07). Bax immunopositivity was associated with well-differentiated (p = .04) and early-stage tumors. Furthermore, a significant inverse relationship between bax and p53 reactivity was defined (p = .05), especially in tumors of endometrioid type. Bax and PR immunoexpression correlated near the limit of statistical significance (p = .08), whereas no relationship was found among bax, bcl-2, and ER immunopositivity. Our results indicate that the differences in immunohistochemical profiles of endometrioid and serous carcinomas support the existence of different molecular pathways of their development. The correlation of immunohistochemical findings with histologic grade and clinical stage could help in predicting biologic behavior and planning treatment in patients who are diagnosed as having these tumors.     

HMGA2 is commonly expressed in uterine serous carcinomas and is a useful adjunct to diagnosis

McCluggage W G, Connolly L E, McBride H A, Kalloger S & Gilks C B (2012) Histopathology  60, 547–553
HMGA2 is commonly expressed in uterine serous carcinomas and is a useful adjunct to diagnosis Aims: Serous carcinoma is the prototype of type 2 uterine carcinoma. In many cases, establishing a diagnosis is straightforward, but problems can arise in that papillary variants of endometrioid carcinoma may be mistaken for serous carcinoma, and glandular variants of serous carcinoma may be misdiagnosed as endometrioid carcinoma. Markers such as p53, oestrogen receptor and p16 may be of use in problematic cases, but there is overlap and these may not therefore be of value in an individual case. It has been shown recently that high‐mobility group AT‐hook 2 (HMGA2) is expressed by most ovarian serous carcinomas, and our aim was to ascertain whether it is also expressed in uterine serous carcinoma and of value in its distinction from endometrioid carcinoma. Methods and results: Whole tissue sections of uterine serous (n = 33) and endometrioid (n = 38) carcinoma were immunostained using HMGA2 antibody. As many of the diagnostic problems relate to the distinction between serous carcinoma and grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma, tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing uterine serous (n = 71) and uterine grade 3 endometrioid (n = 68) carcinomas were also stained. Staining was classified as negative (totally negative or occasional nuclei positive), 1+ (<10% of nuclei positive), 2+ (10–49% of nuclei positive), 3+ (50–74% of nuclei positive), or 4+ (≥75% of nuclei positive). On the whole tissue sections, positive staining was also classified as weak, moderate, or strong, and an immunohistochemical composite score, taking into account both extent and intensity of staining, was calculated. On whole tissue sections, there was a statistically significant difference between HMGA2 staining in serous and endometrioid carcinomas with regard to both extent and composite score, with higher expression in serous carcinomas (P < 0.0001). Thirty of 33 (91%) serous carcinomas were positive, usually with diffuse (3+ or 4+) staining. All five cases of serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (EIC) (the postulated precursor of uterine serous carcinoma) were positive, as were 14 of 38 (37%) endometrioid carcinomas, usually with 1+ or 2+ staining. There was a statistically significant difference in HMGA2 staining in the TMAs between the serous and grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas, with higher expression in the former (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Immunoreactivity for HMGA2 is diffusely positive in whole tissue sections in most uterine serous carcinomas and negative in most endometrioid carcinomas, although, as with other markers, there is overlap in individual cases. In conjunction with other markers, HMGA2 may be of value in problematic uterine carcinomas where the differential diagnosis includes serous and endometrioid carcinoma. As HMGA2 is expressed in serous EIC, this suggests that it may be implicated in the early development of uterine serous carcinoma.