Risk factors for breast cancer in nulliparous women

The relation between hormonal and lifestyle factors and breast cancer risk in nulliparae was investigated using data from two case-control studies conducted in Italy between 1983 and 1994. The study included 1041 nulliparae with histologically confirmed incident breast cancer and 1002 nulliparous controls admitted to hospital for a wide range of acute, non-neoplastic, nonhormone-related diseases. In premenopausal nulliparae, there was an inverse relation with age at menarche [odds ratios (OR) 0.45; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.24-0.86 for > or = 15 years vs < 12], while no association emerged in postmenopausal. Breast cancer risk increased with age at menopause, the OR being 1.91 (95% CI 1.26-2.90) for nulliparae reporting age at menopause > or = 53 years compared with < 45. Abortion was not related to breast cancer risk, the OR being 0.92 for any spontaneous, 0.97 for any induced and 0.77 for > or = 2 total abortions compared to none. The OR was 1.75 (95% CI 1.03-2.97) for women reporting their first abortion at age > or = 30 years compared with < 30. Oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy in menopause were moderately related to risk. The OR was 2.71 (95% CI 1.85-3.95) in nulliparae with a family history of breast cancer and 1.60 (95% CI 1.20-2.14) in those with a history of benign breast disease. Compared with nulliparae reporting a low physical activity, the OR was 0.79 (95% CI 0.54-1.16) for those reporting intermediate/high activity. Breast cancer risk increased with total energy intake, the OR being 1.65 (95% CI 0.99-2.75) in the highest tertile; beta-carotene was inversely related to risk (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.38-0.95) for the highest tertile. Thus, most risk factors for breast cancer in nulliparae were similar to those in women generally.     

Risk factors for hormone receptor-defined breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

The effect of classic breast cancer risk factors on hormone receptor-defined breast cancer is not fully clarified. We explored these associations in a Swedish population-based study. Postmenopausal women ages 50 to 74 years, diagnosed with invasive breast cancer during 1993 to 1995, were compared with 3,065 age frequency-matched controls. We identified 332 estrogen receptor (ER-) and progesterone receptor (PR-) negative, 286 ER+PR-, 71 ER-PR+, 1,165 ER+PR+, and 789 tumors with unknown receptor status. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Women ages >or=30 years, compared with those ages 20 to 24 years at first birth, were at an increased risk of ER+PR+ tumors (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8) but not ER-PR- tumors (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.6). Women who gained >or=30 kg in weight during adulthood had an approximately 3-fold increased relative risk of ER+PR+ tumors (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.9-3.8), but no risk increase of ER-PR- tumors (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.5-2.1), compared with women who gained <10 kg. Compared with never users, women who used menopausal estrogen-progestin therapy for at least 5 years were at increased risk of ER+PR+ tumors (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.1-4.1) but not ER-PR- tumors (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.5). In conclusion, other risk factors were similarly related to breast cancer regardless of receptor status, but high age at first birth, substantial weight gain in adult age, and use of menopausal estrogen-progestin therapy were more strongly related to receptor-positive breast cancer than receptor-negative breast cancer.     

Risk factors for breast cancer in women under 40 years

The relation between hormonal and lifestyle factors and breast cancer risk in women younger than 40 years was investigated using data from two case-control studies conducted in Italy between 1983 and 1994. Cases were 579 women with histologically confirmed, incident breast cancer and controls were 668 women admitted to hospital for acute, non-neoplastic, non-hormone-related diseases. Breast cancer risk was inversely related to age at menarche with a multivariate odds ratio (OR) of 0.53 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.31-0.89) for women reporting menarche at the age of > or = 15 years compared with < 12 years. Breast cancer risk was significantly higher in parae than in nulliparae (OR 1.58), and was directly associated with age at first birth (OR 5.31 among women aged > or = 30 years at first birth compared with those aged < 20), and inversely with time since last birth (OR 3.80 for < 3 years compared with > or = 12). Compared with women reporting no abortion, the OR were 1.10 for any spontaneous, 0.87 for any induced and 0.90 for > or = 2 abortions. With reference to oral contraceptive use, the OR was 1.05 for ever users compared with never users, and no material association was evident with duration, time since first and last use. The OR was 1.79 for more than 13 years of education compared with < 9, 1.85 for a family history of breast cancer and 1.85 for a history of benign breast disease. Breast cancer risk was inversely related to body mass index with an OR of 0.51 (95% CI 0.26-0.97) for > or = 30 kg/m2 compared to < 20. Total energy and alcohol intake were directly related to the risk (OR 1.38 and 1.27 for the highest tertiles of intake compared with the lowest), although the estimates were not significant, whilst raw vegetable and beta-carotene consumption were inversely related to breast cancer risk (OR 0.57 and 0.67 for the highest tertile of intake compared with the lowest). Thus, most risk factors in this large dataset of women aged less than 40 years were similar to those described in breast cancer epidemiology at any age. Of interest are the inverse associations with body mass index, age at menarche and time since last birth, the direct ones with age at first and last birth, and the higher risk of parous women compared with nulliparae.     

The androgen receptor CAG repeat polymorphism and risk of breast cancer in the Nurses' Health Study

Shorter alleles of a polymorphic [CAG](n) repeat in exon 1 of the androgen receptor (AR) have been associated with increased risk of prostate cancer and decreased risk of breast cancer. We prospectively assessed the association between the [CAG](n) repeat polymorphism in the androgen receptor and breast cancer risk among Caucasian women in a case-control study nested within the Nurses' Health Study cohort (cases, n = 727; controls, n = 969). In addition, we assessed whether androgen receptor genotype influences endogenous steroid hormone levels in women and whether the associations between androgen receptor alleles and breast cancer risk differed according to established breast cancer risk factors. Women with one or more long AR [CAG](n) repeat alleles (>or=22 repeats) were not at increased risk of breast cancer [odds ratio (OR), 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83-1.35]. Significant associations were not observed between AR genotypes comprised of two short alleles ([CAG](n) or=22: OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.62-1.36) or two long alleles ([CAG](n) >or= 25 versus both alleles or=22; OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.20-2.40; P for interaction = 0.04). In summary, we observed no overall relation of AR genotype with breast cancer risk among mostly postmenopausal Caucasian women. However, these data suggest that longer AR [CAG](n) repeat alleles may increase breast cancer risk among women with a first-degree family history of breast cancer.     

Co-twin control and cohort analyses of body mass index and height in relation to breast, prostate, ovarian, corpus uteri, colon and rectal cancer among Swedish and Finnish twins

Associations between anthropometric measures and cancer have been studied previously, but relatively few studies have had the opportunity to control for genetic and early shared environmental factors. In this study, we analyzed 2 twin cohorts from Sweden born 1886-1925 (n = 21,870) and 1926-1958 (n = 30,279) and 1 from Finland born 1880-1958 (n = 25,882) including in total 78,031 twins, and studied the association between BMI and height and risk of prostate, breast, ovarian, corpus uteri, colon and rectal cancer. The cohorts were both analyzed through a co-twin control method and as traditional cohorts. In co-twin control analyses, older obese (BMI > or = 30 kg/m(2)) subjects (median age 56 years at baseline) were at higher risk of cancer of the corpus uteri (OR = 3.0; 95% CI 0.9-10.6), colon (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 0.8-4.5) and breast (OR = 2.5; 95% CI 1.3-4.2). For younger obese women (median age 30 years at baseline), an inverse tendency was observed for breast cancer (OR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.3-1.5, p for trend = 0.05). The tallest women had an increased risk of breast (OR = 1.8; 95% CI 1.3-2.7) and ovarian cancer (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 0.8-3.5). No consistent associations were found for prostate cancer either for BMI or height. There are some suggestions in our study that uncontrolled genetic or early shared environmental factors may affect risk estimates in studies of anthropometric measures and cancer risk, but do not explain observations of increased cancer risks related to BMI or height.     

Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in Iranian Women Aged Less than 40 Years

This case-control study was carried out in a university-affiliated teaching hospital, Tehran city, Iran. A total of312 newly diagnosed cases aged less than 40 years old participated and were matched for age and ethnicity with312 controls. The results showed that in women who never married (OR=2.42 95%CI=1.51-3.88) (P<0.001), hada family history of breast cancer (OR=7.07 95%CI=2.95-16.99) (P<0.001), a low age of menarche (OR=0.1 95%CI=0.04-0.23) (P<0.001)), lower parity (OR=13.3 95% CI=3.89-45.66) (P<0.001) and took oral contraceptive pills(OR= 2.83 95% CI=1.87-4.24) (P<0.000) were at increased risk. A direct association with age at first birth wasalso evident(P=0.041), with a significantly inverse association between duration of lactation and breast cancer risk(p=0.016). On multivariate logistic regression, parity, family history of breast cancer, use of oral contraceptivepills, and age at first birth remained significant. In women lower than 40 years of age, breast cancer risk wassignificantly higher in women with parity ≥4 compared with nulliparity but no association emerged with historyof breast-feeding. Other risk factors were similar to those described in breast cancer epidemiology at any age.     

The Investigation of Risk Factors Impacting Breast Cancer in Guilan Province

Introduction: Breast cancer is multifactorial therefore more recognition of risk factors is important in its prevention. Objective: This study was conducted in order to determine the factors influencing breast cancer in women referred to health centers in Guilan province in 2015-2016. Method: In a case- control study, 225 women with breast cancer were investigated. The control group consisted of 225 healthy women of the relatives (third-rank) whose phone numbers were obtained from the patients. Data were collected through telephone interviews. Results: The risk of breast cancer raised in women who have a family history of other cancers (OR= 3.5; 95% CI= 1.96-6.6) ,exposure to X-Ray (OR= 2.5; 95% CI=1.1-5.5), having more than 4 children (OR= 2.695% CI=1.2-4.8), age more than 36 years at first pregnancy(OR=2.3; 95% CI=0.7-5.1),primary levelof education (OR= 5.4;95% CI=2.8-11.2) and inadequate intake of fruit (OR=1.5; 95% CI=1-2.2). Also, presence of the following factors reduced breast cancer risk: regular menstruation (OR= 0.66; CI=0.4- 0.9), duration of breastfeeding more than 12 months, less than 6 months and 7-12 months (OR=0.23; 95% CI=0.09-0.59 , OR=0.29; 95% CI=0.17-0.49 and OR=0.03; 95% CI=0.01-0.08) and parity (OR=0.4; 95% CI=0.27-0.83) In multiple linear regression analysis of higher education (OR=0.16; 95% CI=0.03-0.77), using contraceptives for more than 16 years (OR=2.3; 95% CI=1.4-3.9), family history of other cancers (OR=6.1; 95% CI=1.9-19.3) and a history of X-Ray exposure (OR=4.4; 95% CI=1.07-18.1) were considered as predictive factors. Conclusion: The results of this study emphasize the importance of informing women about breast cancer risk factors. So, identification of these risk factors is required as important means of prevention and treatment of breast cancer.     

Breast cancer risk: effects of estrogen replacement therapy and body mass.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have focused on the association between breast cancer risk and a variety of lifestyle and exogenous factors. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, oral contraceptive (OC) use, estrogen replacement therapy (ERT), and body mass on risk of breast cancer. METHODS: These variables were examined in a case-control study of 604 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer and 520 control subjects who did not have breast cancer and were frequency matched for age, hospital, and time of diagnosis. These case patients and control subjects were part of an ongoing study of breast cancer by the American Health Foundation and were selected for interview from hospitals in the New York City area from January 1987 through December 1989. The data were analyzed by computation of odds ratios (ORs) for potential risk factors, with adjustment for age at diagnosis and other potential confounding variables and with stratification by menopausal status. RESULTS: We observed positive effects of ERT and high body mass on the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer, particularly when each factor was examined in the absence of the other factor. In lean postmenopausal women, the adjusted summary OR associated with ERT was significantly elevated (OR = 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-3.5; P < .01), and there was a statistically significant dose response of breast cancer risk with ERT duration (adjusted ORs = 2.0 for < 5 years and 2.2 for > or = 5 years; positive trend, P < .02). Reciprocally, in women who did not receive ERT, high body mass (Quetelet index > 27) was a significant risk factor for postmenopausal breast cancer (OR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.3-3.3; P < .02), and the linear trend in risk with increasing body mass was significant (positive trend, P < .02). The strongest effect of body mass occurred in women who were lean at age 18 and gained enough weight to place them in the upper tertile of body mass at the time of diagnosis (OR = 2.6; 95% CI = 1.5-4.6; P < .01). There was no evidence of significant positive associations between breast cancer risk and cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, or OC use in any subgroup of these women. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the hypothesis that excess adipose deposition heightens breast cancer risk in the postmenopausal years. Furthermore, they underscore the need for continuing investigation of the effects of exogenous estrogens on the development of this malignancy, particularly in lean postmenopausal women.     

Breast carcinoma in situ: risk factors and screening patterns.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors associated with invasive breast cancer are well documented, but those associated with breast carcinoma in situ are not well defined. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, case-control study among female residents of Connecticut to identify risk factors for breast carcinoma in situ. Case patients, diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 875) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) (n = 123), were matched by 5-year age groups with control subjects (n = 999). Case patients were diagnosed between September 15, 1994, through March 14, 1998, and all subjects were between the ages of 20 and 79 years. Information on risk factors and cancer-screening history was collected by telephone interviews. Conditional logistic regression was used to determine odds ratios (ORs) for the association of these factors with the risk of DCIS and LCIS. RESULTS: Case patients with DCIS were more likely than control subjects to report a family history of breast cancer (OR = 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19 to 1.85) or previous breast biopsy (OR = 3.56; 95% CI = 2.86 to 4.43). They also had fewer full-term pregnancies (OR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.93) and were older at first full-term pregnancy (OR for being 20-29 years old relative to being <20 years old = 1.68; 95% CI = 1.17 to 2.43) and at menopause (OR for being > or =55 years old relative to being <45 years old = 1.71; 95% CI = 1.05 to 2.77). DCIS case patients were more likely than control subjects to have had a mammographic examination (OR = 2.46; 95% CI = 1.78 to 3.40) or an annual clinical breast examination (OR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.48 to 2.26). DCIS patients and control subjects did not differ with respect to oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy, alcohol consumption or smoking history, or breast self-examination. Associations for LCIS were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The risk factors associated with DCIS and LCIS are similar to those associated with invasive breast cancer. Diagnosis of DCIS is associated with increased mammography screening.     

克拉玛依市区女性乳腺癌危险因素的病例对照研究

 目的　探讨克拉玛依市区女性乳腺癌的危险因素。方法　用病例对照研究方法调查129例女性乳腺癌和对应的129名对照者,用Logistic回归模型进行乳腺癌危险因素分析。结果　乳腺癌的危险因素有乳腺癌家族史（OR＝2.744,95 % CI＝1.884～4.674）、乳腺增生症（OR＝1.423,95 % CI＝1.160～1.810）、 乳腺炎（OR＝2.363,95 % CI＝2.039～3.934）、子宫肌瘤（OR＝1.623,95 % CI＝1.263～2.024）、 流产（OR＝1.723,95 % CI＝1.143～2.600）、 饮酒（OR＝1.243,95 % CI＝1.040～1.483）、精神创伤（OR＝2.184,95 % CI＝1.753～3.025）、长期接触电离辐射（OR＝1.374,95 % CI＝1.152～1.699）; 保护因素有初潮年龄增大（OR＝0.773,95 % CI＝0.674～0.956）、累计哺乳时间（OR＝0.672,95 % CI＝0.480～0.941）、坚持运动（OR＝0.572,95 % CI＝0.391～0.837）。结论　以上11个因素为克拉玛依市区女性乳腺癌重要的危险因素和保护因素。     

Cigarette smoking and breast cancer risk among young women (United States)

Objectives: To evaluate whether heavy cigarette smoking as a teenager or long-term smoking increases breast cancer risk or, alternatively, whether smoking acts as an anti-estrogen and reduces risk.Methods: Data from a multi-center, population-based, case-control study among women under age 55 were analyzed.Results: Among women under age 45, there was a modest inverse relation with current (OR=0.82, 95% CI=0.67, 1.01) but not past (OR=0.99, 95% CI=0.81, 1.21) smoking. Odds ratios were decreased for current smokers who began at an early age (0.59 for15, 95% CI=0.41, 0.85) or continued for long periods of time (0.70 for >21 years, 95% CI=0.52, 0.94). In subgroup analyses, reduced odds ratios were observed among current smokers who were ever users of oral contraceptives (0.79, 95% CI=0.63, 0.98), were in the lowest quartile of adult body size (0.53, 95% CI=0.34, 0.81), or never or infrequently drank alcohol (0.68, 95% CI=0.47, 0.98). Among women ages 45-54, there was little evidence for an association with smoking.Conclusions: These results suggest that breast cancer risk among women under age 45 may be reduced among current smokers who began smoking at an early age, or long-term smokers, but require confirmation from other studies.     

Genetic ancestry and risk factors for breast cancer among Latinas in the San Francisco Bay Area.

BACKGROUND: Genetic association studies using case-control designs are susceptible to false-positive and false-negative results if there are differences in genetic ancestry between cases and controls. We measured genetic ancestry among Latinas in a population-based case-control study of breast cancer and tested the association between ancestry and known breast cancer risk factors. We reasoned that if genetic ancestry is associated with known breast cancer risk factors, then the results of genetic association studies would be confounded. METHODS: We used 44 ancestry informative markers to estimate individuals' genetic ancestry in 563 Latina participants. To test whether ancestry is a predictor of hormone therapy use, parity, and body mass index (BMI), we used multivariate logistic regression models to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) associated with a 25% increase in Indigenous American ancestry, adjusting for age, education, and the participant's and grandparents' place of birth. RESULTS: Hormone therapy use was significantly less common among women with higher Indigenous American ancestry (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63-0.96). Higher Indigenous American ancestry was also significantly associated with overweight (BMI, 25-29.9 versus <25) and obesity (BMI, > or =30 versus <25), but only among foreign-born Latina women (OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.97-5.99 and OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.24-3.06, respectively). CONCLUSION: Some breast cancer risk factors are associated with genetic ancestry among Latinas in the San Francisco Bay Area. Therefore, case-control genetic association studies for breast cancer should directly measure genetic ancestry to avoid potential confounding.     

Steroid hormone levels during pregnancy and incidence of maternal breast cancer.

Previous studies evaluating pregnancy hormone levels and maternal breast cancer were limited to surrogate indicators of exposure. This study directly evaluates the association between measured serum steroid hormone levels during pregnancy and maternal risk of breast cancer. A nested case-control study was conducted to examine third-trimester serum levels of total unconjugated estradiol, estrone, estriol, and progesterone in women who were pregnant between 1959 and 1966. Cases (n = 194) were diagnosed with in situ or invasive breast cancer between 1969 and 1991. Controls (n = 374) were matched to cases by age at the time of index pregnancy, using randomized recruitment. Elevated progesterone levels were associated with a decreased incidence of breast cancer [odds ratio (OR) for progesterone > or =270 ng/ml, 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22-1.1] relative to those below the lowest decile. This association was stronger for cancers diagnosed at or before age 50 (OR for progesterone > or =270 ng/ml, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.9). Increased estrone levels were associated with an increased incidence overall (OR for estrone > or =18.7 ng/ml, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.0-6.2), whereas a positive association with estradiol was not observed. Too few cases occurred within 15 years of the index pregnancy to compare adequately the short- and long-term effects of pregnancy hormone exposure. When estrogen-to-progesterone ratios were evaluated, there was an indication of a modest increased incidence of breast cancer for those with high total estrogens and high estrone levels relative to progesterone. These findings suggest that pregnancy steroid hormone levels are risk factors for breast cancer.     

Family history and risk of breast cancer in hispanic and non-hispanic women: the New Mexico Women's Health Study

Objectives: Many epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that an increased risk of breast cancer is associated with positive family history of this disease. Little information had been available on the relationship of breast cancer risk with family history in Hispanic women. To investigate the association of family history of breast cancer on the risk of breast cancer, we examined the data from the New Mexico Women's Health Study (NMWHS), a statewide case–control study. Methods: In this study 712 women (332 Hispanics and 380 non-Hispanic whites) with breast cancer and 844 controls (388 Hispanics and 456 non-Hispanic whites) were included. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI), adjusted for sociodemographic, medical, and reproductive factors. Results: We found an increased risk in women with a history of breast cancer in one or more first-degree or second-degree relatives (OR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.2–1.9), first-degree relatives (OR = 1.3, 95% CI 1.0–1.8) and second-degree relatives (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.2–2.2). Hispanic women had higher risk estimates for a positive family history (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.1–2.5) than non-Hispanic white women (OR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.0–2.0); however, the differences were not statistically significant. In both ethnic groups a higher risk was observed in premenopausal women compared with postmenopausal women and women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50years compared with older women. Conclusions: The results indicate that Hispanic women with a family history of breast cancer are at increased risk of breast cancer.     

Oral contraceptive use and risk of breast carcinoma in situ.

There is some indication that oral contraceptive use may be associated with a small increase in risk of invasive breast cancer; however, oral contraceptive use in relation to breast carcinoma in situ (BCIS) has rarely been studied. We investigated oral contraceptive use in relation to risk of BCIS in a large population-based case-control study. Female residents of Wisconsin, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire aged 20 to 74 years with a new diagnosis of BCIS (n=1,878) were identified from statewide tumor registries in 1997 to 2001. Age-matched female controls (n=8,041) were randomly selected from population lists. Information on oral contraceptive use and other risk factors was collected during structured telephone interviews. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using logistic regression. In multivariate models, ever use of oral contraceptives was associated with a small and marginally significant increase in BCIS overall (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.99-1.25) and for ductal carcinoma in situ (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.31). No strong associations were detected according to age started, duration, time since first or last use, or oral contraceptive use relative to the first full-term pregnancy. The slightly increased risk of BCIS seemed limited to former users (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.00-1.27) and women without a family history of breast cancer (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.32 for ever versus never use). Consistent with invasive breast cancer, these results suggest that oral contraceptive use is at most a minor contributor to BCIS risk.     

Polymorphic catechol-O-methyltransferase gene and breast cancer risk.

We examined 483 Finnish breast cancer cases and 482 population controls to determine the potential effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) genotype in individual susceptibility to breast cancer. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by unconditional logistic regression after adjustment for known or suspected risk factors for breast cancer. When studied separately by menopausal status, the COMT-L allele-containing genotypes were inversely associated with premenopausal breast cancer, especially with advanced stage of the disease (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.87). Among postmenopausal women a similar decreased risk was seen for local carcinoma associated with the COMT-LL genotype (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.98). The lowest breast cancer risk was seen in the postmenopausal women with the COMT-LL genotype and low body-mass index (30 months) use of estrogen (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.13-14.3), or with the COMT-L allele-containing genotypes and early age (相似文献   

Risk factors for breast cancer in Turkish women: a hospital-based case-control study

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between risk factors and breast cancer in Turkish women. In a hospital-based case-control study in Istanbul, 405 patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer were compared with 1050 controls, who were admitted to different departments of the same hospital. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each risk factor were obtained from logistic regression analyses. Risk factors for breast cancer were found to be early menarche age (OR 3.87, 95% CI 2.46-6.08), use of alcohol (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.79-8.37), history of diabetes (OR 3.31, 95% CI 2.36-4.64) or hypertension (OR 3.44, 95% CI 2.07-5.71), oral contraceptive use (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.38-2.85) and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.15-3.29). The findings of the present study indicated that history of diabetes or hypertension, use of alcohol, oral contraceptive and HRT, never having breastfed and delayed age at first birth associated with changing of lifestyle led to an increased risk of breast cancer in Turkish women.     

Second primary ovarian cancer among women diagnosed previously with cancer.

This study assessed the risk of second primary ovarian cancer among United States women diagnosed previously with invasive cancer. We analyzed data from cancer registries participating in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program for women diagnosed with invasive cancer between 1973 and 1996. We calculated the risk [observed (O)/expected numbers (E)] of second primary ovarian cancer by cancer site and age at diagnosis of first primary cancer (<50 years and > or =50 years), race (all, white, and black), and years since first cancer (0-4, 5-9, 10-14, and 15-24 years). Statistical tests and 95% confidence intervals (CI) assumed a Poisson distribution. A significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer was found for women who were aged <50 years at diagnosis with melanoma (O/E = 3.5, 95% CI = 2.1-5.5) or cancer of the breast (O/E = 6.0, 95% CI = 4.9-7.2), cervix (O/E = 4.2, 95% CI = 2.6-6.3), corpus uteri (O/E = 11.9, 95% CI = 7.3-18.4), colon (O/E = 17.9, 95% CI = 11.1-27.3), or ovary (O/E = 4.9, 95% CI = 2.7-8.2). No increased risk was found for women aged > or =50 years. Ovarian cancer risk remained elevated after these first primary cancers 5-9 years after diagnosis; for breast and colon cancer, risk remained elevated 15-24 years after diagnosis. Women > or =50 years at diagnosis with melanoma or cancer of the cervix, corpus uteri, ovary, rectum, or lung and bronchus were at a decreased risk for second primary ovarian cancer. Ovarian cancer risk is higher than expected for women who were diagnosed with certain types of cancer at <50 years of age.     

The relation of reproductive factors to mortality from breast cancer.

Young women with breast cancer have been reported to have an increased risk of dying from their disease if they have given birth in <2 years before diagnosis. The prognostic factors associated with the tumors of these women have not been thoroughly studied. We examined the tumors of the women who had a recent birth and compared the tumor characteristics with those of women who were nulliparous or had given birth > or =5 years before diagnosis. A follow-up study was conducted of 1174 women <45 years old whose invasive ductal breast cancer was diagnosed from January 1983 to December 1992 in three counties of western Washington. These women had participated previously in a population-based, case-control study. Mean follow-up time was 105.4 months. Histological slides were collected for 79.1% of the tumors and reviewed by the study pathologist. Using immunoperoxidase assays, tumor tissue was tested for prognostic markers for 70.4% of the tumors from the women. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the relative risk of dying from breast cancer associated with reproductive events. Logistic regression was used to obtain estimates of the association between various reproductive factors and tumor characteristics. At the end of follow-up, 48.2% of the women (n = 83) whose last birth occurred in < 2 years of diagnosis had died, compared with 23.3% of nulliparous women (n = 189) and 24.4% of the women (n = 661) whose last birth was > or =5 years before diagnosis. The tumors of the women with a recent birth (<2 years before diagnosis) were more likely to be progesterone receptor negative, odds ratio (OR) = 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-3.9, to be p53 positive, OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.5-4.7, to be of high histological grade, OR = 5.9, 95% CI = 1.7-20.1, to have high mitotic count, OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.4-4.4, to be node positive, OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.3-3.5, to have a high S phase fraction, OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.1-4.8, and to have a high American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (III+), OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-5.8, compared with the tumors of nulliparous women. After adjusting for tumor characteristics and treatment, the risk of mortality associated with a birth in < 2 years of diagnosis of breast cancer remained an independent predictor of mortality, hazard radio (HR) = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.6-4.3. Our study provides evidence that reproductive factors influence the biological behavior of breast cancer in young women and prognosis. Clinicians need to be aware that women who have delivered a child in < 2 years before diagnosis are at increased risk of having tumors with especially adverse prognostic profiles and have a poorer survival rate than women who are nulliparous or whose last birth was some years in the past.     

Method of Cooking and Risk of Breast Cancer in the Philippines

Objective Among Asian countries, the highest age-standardized rates of breast cancer have been reported for the Philippines. The influence of diet and lifestyle factors as possible contributors to these high rates has not been well-studied. We conducted a case-control study in Manila to examine the association between methods of cooking and the risk of breast cancer. Methods Eligible subjects were women undergoing evaluation at the Philippine General Hospital (PGH), Manila for a breast problem. All of the women completed a risk factor questionnaire prior to the determination of their case (n = 240) or control (n = 240) status. Information regarding current, as well as usual method of cooking in the household at 12 years of age was obtained. Results Boiling food in coconut milk was associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–3.8). There were positive associations between boiling food in coconut milk and the risk of breast cancer currently (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.0–3.3), and at 12 years of age (OR = 2.9; 95% CI 1.6–5.5). A positive association between frying food and breast cancer risk was restricted to women whose household fried food at 12 years of age (OR = 1.89; 95% CI 1.1–3.4). Conclusions The results of this study suggest that various cooking methods during adolescence and possibly in adulthood may be associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. These findings require confirmation.