The role of feeding advancement strategy on length of stay and hospital costs in newborns with gastroschisis

Background: Infants with gastroschisis require prolonged hospitalization for surgical repair and gradual advancement of feeds. The present study explores the effect of a change in a protocolized enteral feeding regimen with length of hospital stay (LOS) and total costs in newborns with gastroschisis.Methods: A retrospective review was performed in neonates with uncomplicated gastroschisis at a free-standing pediatric institution from 2012 to 2020. The effect of two different enteral feed advancement protocols on clinical outcomes and hospital costs was analyzed.Results: Seventy-four patients were identified, of which 50 (68%) underwent 10 ml/kg/day feeding advancements, and 24 (32%) underwent 20 ml/kg/day feeding advancements. Compared to neonates who underwent 10 ml/kg/day enteral advancements, neonates receiving 20 ml/kg/day advancements reached goal feeds faster (14 vs 20 days, p<0.001), were younger at goal feeds (26 vs 34 days, p = 0.001), required fewer days of parenteral nutrition (22 vs 29 days, p = 0.001), and had shorter LOS (30 vs 36 days, p = 0.001). On multivariable analysis, total costs decreased by 9.77% in the 20 ml/kg/day advancement cohort (p = 0.071).Conclusion: In neonates with uncomplicated gastroschisis who underwent primary repair, a nutritional protocol that incorporated 20 ml/kg/day feeding advancements was safe and resulted in faster attainment of goal feeds and shorter LOS.Level of evidence: II/III.     

Retrospective study of consecutive rib fracture patients treated by open reduction internal fixation in a single major trauma centre,UK.

IntroductionRib fractures are a common presentation in both patients presenting with high impact poly-trauma and as a result of low energy falls in the elderly. This injury can lead to various complications including prolonged hospital admission, pneumonia, need for ventilation and in admission to intensive care unit. There is much controversy around the management of this injury in the literature, with favourable outcomes for patients treated non-operatively as well as surgically.MethodsWe collated a database for all rib fracture fixations between 2014 and 2019 that took place at the major trauma centre in Liverpool. The decision to undergo surgical fixation was after discussion with multidisciplinary team at trauma meeting. Following British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOASTs), these injuries should ideally be operated on within 48 h.ResultsOverall, a total of 220 patients were included in the study (143 male and 77 female). 142 (64%) patients were operated on within 48 h of admission. A total of 101 (45%) patients required admission to ITU. Those in the early surgical fixation group had a statistically significant decrease in their hospital length of stay (12.8 days compared to 15.5 days, p=<0.001). Mean length of ITU stay was shorter in the early surgical group with no statistical significance (p = 0.1). Those patients that required mechanical ventilation in turn stayed in hospital for a longer period compared to those who did not (p=<0.001). There is no statistical difference in survival between the 2 patient groups (p = 0.3).DiscussionTo our knowledge, this is the largest data set published in the rib fracture fixation cohort. Our results agree with previous studies which have demonstrated that those who undergo ORIF tend require fewer days of hospital stay, less ventilatory support and overall have better outcomes in terms of pain when compared to those treated non-operatively. Our study adds that patients who receive treatment within 48-hours as per BOAST guidelines have better outcomes, specifically reducing hospital length of stay by nearly 4 days (p = 0.014).ConclusionEarly surgical fixation of rib fractures leads to significantly favoured outcomes.     

The value of compassion: Healthcare savings of palliative care consults in trauma

BackgroundThe effects of palliative care (PC) consultation on patient costs and hospitalization metrics in the adult trauma population are unclear.Study DesignWe interrogated our Level I trauma center databases from 1/1/19 to 3/31/21 for patients age ≥18 admitted to the trauma service. Patients undergoing PC consult were matched using propensity scoring to those without PC consultation based on age, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, Injury Severity Score and Head Abbreviated Injury Scale. Total costs, total cost per day, hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, intubation days, discharge disposition, and rates of nephrology consultation and tracheostomy/feeding tube placements were compared.Results140 unique patients underwent PC consultation and were matched to a group not receiving PC consult during the same period. Median total costs in the PC cohort were $39,532 compared to $70,330 in the controls (p<0.01).  Median costs per day in the PC cohort were $3,495 vs $17,970 in the controls (p<0.01).  Median costs per ICU day in the PC cohort were $3,774 vs $17,127 in the controls (p<0.01).  Mean hospital LOS (15.7 vs 7 days), ICU LOS (7.9 vs 2.9 days), and ventilator days (5.1 vs 1.5) were significantly higher in the PC cohort (all p<0.01).  Rates of nephrology consultation (8.6 vs 2.1%, p = 0.03) and tracheostomy/feeding tube placements (12.1 vs 1.4%, p<0.01) were also higher in the PC group.  Patients were more likely to discharge to hospice if they received a PC consult (33.6 vs 2.1%, p<0.01).  Mean time to PC consult was 7.2 days (range 1 hour to 45 days). LOS post-consult correlated positively with time to PC consultation (r = 0.27, p<0.01).ConclusionExpert PC services are known to alleviate suffering and avert patient goal- and value-incongruent care. While trauma patients demand significant resources, PC consultation offered in concordance with life-sustaining interventions is associated with significant savings to patients and the healthcare system. Given the correlation between LOS following PC consult and time to PC consult, savings may be amplified by earlier PC consultation in appropriate patients.     

Early tracheostomy improves outcomes in severely injured children and adolescents

Background

Early tracheostomy has been advocated for adult trauma patients to improve outcomes and resource utilization. We hypothesized that timing of tracheostomy for severely injured children would similarly impact outcomes.

Methods

Injured children undergoing tracheostomy over a 10-year period (2002–2012) were reviewed. Early tracheostomy was defined as post-injury day ≤ 7. Data were compared using Student's t test, Pearson chi-squared test and Fisher exact test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

During the 10-year study period, 91 patients underwent tracheostomy following injury. Twenty-nine (32%) patients were < 12 years old; of these, 38% received early tracheostomy. Sixty-two (68%) patients were age 13 to 18; of these, 52% underwent early tracheostomy. Patients undergoing early tracheostomy had fewer ventilator days (p = 0.003), ICU days (p = 0.003), hospital days (p = 0.046), and tracheal complications (p = 0.03) compared to late tracheostomy. There was no difference in pneumonia (p = 0.48) between early and late tracheostomy.

Conclusion

Children undergoing early tracheostomy had improved outcomes compared to those who underwent late tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy should be considered for the severely injured child.

Summary

Early tracheostomy is advocated for adult trauma patients to improve patient comfort and resource utilization. In a review of 91 pediatric trauma patients undergoing tracheostomy, those undergoing tracheostomy on post-injury day ≤ 7 had fewer ventilator days, ICU days, hospital days, and tracheal complications compared to those undergoing tracheostomy after post-injury day 7.     

The impact of obesity on polytraumatized patients with operatively treated fractures

IntroductionThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of obesity on outcomes following operative treatment of fractures in obese polytrauma patients.MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study at a level I trauma centre from January 2014 until December 2017. The eligibility criteria were adult (age >= 18 years) polytrauma patients who presented with at least one orthopaedic fracture that required operative fixation. Polytrauma was defined as having an Injury Severity Score (ISS) >= 16. Out of 891 patients, a total of 337 were included with 85 being obese. The primary outcome variable was the total hospital length of stay in days. The secondary outcome variables were the number of patients who had an intensive care unit (ICU) admission, the ICU length of stay in days, the number of patients who had mechanical ventilation, the duration of mechanical ventilation in days, perioperative complications, and mortality.ResultsObesity was associated with increased total hospital stay (36 vs. 27 days; P<0.001), increased ICU stay (13 vs. 8 days; P = 0.04), increased ICU admissions (83.5% vs. 68.6%; P = 0.008) and increased incidence of mechanical ventilation (64.7% vs. 43.7%; P = 0.001). These findings remained statistically significant following adjusted regression models for age, gender, ISS, and injuries sustained. However, the mechanical ventilation duration was not significantly different between both groups on adjusted and unadjusted analyses. However, an increase per unit BMI significantly increases the duration of mechanical ventilation (P = 0.02). In terms of complications, obesity was only associated with an increase in acute renal failure (ARF) on unadjusted analyses (P = 0.004). Whereas, adjusted logistic regression demonstrated that an increase per BMI unit led to a significant increase in the odds ratio for wound infection (P = 0.03) and ARF (P = 0.024).ConclusionsThis study displayed that obesity was detrimental to polytrauma patients with operatively treated fractures leading to prolonged hospital and ICU length of stay. This highlights the importance of optimizing trauma care for obese polytraumatized patients to reduce morbidity. With 41.1% of our population being obese, obesity presents a unique challenge in the care of polytrauma patients which mandates further research in improving health care for this population group.     

Does surgical approach matter in the treatment of pediatric ulcerative colitis?

BackgroundThis study aims to compare the morbidity of open versus laparoscopic colectomy or proctocolectomy for pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) using national readmission outcomes.Materials and methodsThe 2010–2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify patients < 18 years (excluding newborns) who underwent colectomy or proctocolectomy for UC. Patients with planned readmissions for staged procedures were excluded from readmission analysis. Demographics, hospital factors, and outcomes were compared by operative approach (open vs. laparoscopic) using standard statistical analysis. Results were weighted for national estimates.ResultsThere were 1922 patients (51% female, age 13 ± 3 years) with UC who underwent colectomy or proctocolectomy during index admission. Most cases were performed open (54%) and as elective admissions (64%). Compared to open approach, laparoscopy was associated with shorter index hospital length of stay (8 [5-17] days vs. 9 [6-18] days, p = 0.015), fewer surgical site infections (< 2% vs. 2%, p = 0.022), and less post-operative gastrointestinal dysfunction (5% vs. 8%, p = 0.008). After stratifying to control for elective and unplanned index admissions, laparoscopic approach was associated with fewer small bowel obstructions during index hospitalizations in both elective (9% vs. 15%, p = 0.003) and unplanned (5% vs. 16%, p<0.001) settings. Readmission for surgical site infection was also less common following laparoscopic approach in both elective (0% vs. 7%, p = 0.008) and unplanned (0% vs. < 7%, p = 0.017) settings.ConclusionsIn pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis, laparoscopic colectomy or proctocolectomy is associated with shorter hospital length of stay, less post-operative complications, and improved readmission outcomes.     

Influence of late fluid management on the outcomes of severe trauma patients: A retrospective analysis of 294 severely-injured patients

BackgroundLiberal late fluid management (LFM) is associated with higher morbi-mortality in critically ill populations. The aim of the study was to assess the association between LFM and duration of mechanical ventilation in a severe trauma population.MethodsA retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with an ISS ≥ 16 and a length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) ≥ 7 days was performed. The conservative LFM group included patients with at least 2 consecutive days with a negative fluid balance between day 3 and day 7; other patients were allocated to the liberal LFM group.Results294 severely injured patients were included, 157 (53%) as conservative LFM and 137 (47%) as liberal LFM. The groups did not differ significantly in terms of baseline characteristics, severe injuries, severity criteria or transfusion needs. Liberal LFM was significantly associated with more ventilation days (11 vs 8.5 days; P = 0.02), less ventilator-free days at day 30 (19 vs 21 days; P = 0.03), longer ICU stay (19 vs 16 days; P = 0.03) and longer hospital stay (30 vs 25 days; P = 0.04). Mortality rates were comparable between groups (6%). Liberal LFM was significantly associated in multivariable analysis with a reduced number of ventilator-free days at day 30 (β = − 2.14 [95% CI, −4.2 to −0.08], P = 0.042).ConclusionsLiberal LFM was associated with higher morbidity in severe trauma patients, longer duration of ventilation, and longer ICU and hospital stays. These results were observed despite similar severity on admission and early fluid management.     

Retrospective comparison of operative technique for chest wall injuries

BackgroundSurgical management of chest wall injuries is a common procedure. However, operative techniques are diverse, and no universal guidelines exist. There is a lack of studies comparing the outcome with different operative techniques for chest wall surgery. The aim of this study was to compare hospital outcomes between patients operated for chest wall injuries with a conventional method with large incisions and often a thoracotomy or a minimally invasive, muscle sparing method.Patients and methodsA retrospective study was carried out including patients ≥18 years operated for chest wall injuries 2010–2020. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgery performed: conventional surgery (C-group) and minimally invasive surgery (M-group). Data on demographics, trauma, surgery, and outcomes were extracted from patient records. Primary outcome was length of stay on mechanical ventilator (MV-LOS). Secondary outcomes were length of stay in intensive care (ICU-LOS) and in hospital (H-LOS), and complications such as re-operation, incidence of empyema, tracheostomy, pneumonia, and mortality.ResultsOf 311 included patients, 220 were in the C-group and 91 in the M-group. The groups were similar in demographics and injury pattern. MV-LOS was 0 (0–65) in the C-group vs 0 (0–34) in the M-group (p < 0.001). ICU-LOS and H-LOS were significantly shorter in the M-group as compared to the C-group (p < 0.001), however with a large overlap. Tracheostomy was performed in 22.3% of patients in the C-group vs 5.4% in the M-group (p < 0.001). Pneumonia was diagnosed in 32.3% of patients in the C-group vs 16.1% in the M-group (p = 0.004). In-hospital mortality was lower in the M-group compared to the C-group but there was no difference in mortality within 30 days or a year.ConclusionsOur study indicates that a minimally invasive technique was favorable regarding clinical outcomes for patients operated for chest wall injuries.     

Outcomes following burn injury in intensive care patients with major psychiatric disorders

AimsPatients with psychiatric comorbidity have been shown to experience high rates of burn injury. Burn epidemiology, etiology, and outcomes have been sparsely documented for patients with major psychiatric disorders. The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiologic characteristics and outcomes in intensive care burn patients with pre-existing and acute major psychiatric disorders .MethodsA retrospective study was performed including intensive care burn patients admitted between March 2007 and December 2020. Demographic, clinical and epidemiological data were collected and analyzed. Major psychiatric co-morbidities were collected according to ICD-9 and ICD-10 classifications. Patients were stratified according to F-diagnoses.ResultsA total of 1325 patients were included. 16.6 % of all patients had one or more major psychiatric disorders- 9.3 % with anxiety, dissociative, stress-related, somatoform and other nonpsychotic mental disorders, 9.2 % with mood (affective) disorders, 3.5 % with schizophrenia and other non-mood psychotic disorders, and 1.8 % with disorders of adult personality and behavior. Patients with major psychiatric disorders presented with significantly higher burn severity, reflected by higher abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI) scores (5.9 vs. 5.3, p < 0.001) and larger total body surface area (TBSA) affected (15.9 vs. 12.5 %, p = 0.002). Burned TBSA ≥ 30 and inhalation injuries were observed more frequently in patients with MDP, however without statistical significance. They also experienced prolonged hospital length-of-stay (LOS) (25.5 vs. 16.3 days, p < 0.001), prolonged intensive care unit LOS (14.8 vs. 7.7 days, p < 0.001), underwent surgical interventions (3.5 vs. 2.3, p < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation more frequently (34.1 % vs. 16.5 %, p = 0.43) and had significantly longer ventilation durations (73.5 vs. 31.2 h, p = 0.002). Mortality rates were lower compared to patients without major psychiatric disorders (5.9 vs. 8.1, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe prevalence of major psychiatric disorders in burn patients is considerably high. Patients with psychiatric comorbidities were found to have greater burn severity, prolonged total hospital and ICU LOS, underwent surgical interventions and mechanical ventilation more frequently and had prolonged ventilation duration. Our results highlight the importance of identifying burn patients with major psychiatric disorders who may necessitate additional resources and require extensive inpatient psychiatric care and counseling.     

A National Registry Analysis of the Association of Perioperative Regional Anesthesia with hospital length of stay following open reduction and internal fixation of the ankle

Study objectivesTo evaluate if using regional anesthesia for post-operative pain control for patients who underwent ankle ORIF is associated with a decrease in length of stay.DesignMulticenter retrospective cohort study.SettingInpatient perioperative.Patients12,468 inpatients (2007 to 2016) who received ankle ORIF with and without regional anesthesia for pain control.InterventionsRegional Anesthesia for postoperative pain control.MeasurementsHospital length of stay along with multiple covariates.Main resultsThe median [quartiles] hospital length of stay of the non-regional anesthesia and regional anesthesia cohorts were 1 day [0, 2 days] and 0 days [0, 1 day], respectively (p < 0.0001). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, the use of regional anesthesia was associated with decreased time to hospital discharge (HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03–1.14, p = 0.002). Using 1:2 propensity score matching, the median [quartiles] hospital length of stay between the non-regional anesthesia and regional anesthesia matched cohorts were 0 days [0, 1 day] (range = 0–56 days) and 0 day [0, 1 day] (range = 0–33 days), respectively (p = 0.013).ConclusionThe use of regional anesthesia for post-operative pain control was associated with a decreased length of stay for patients undergoing ankle ORIF.     

Tracheostomy in craniectomised survivors after traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional analytical study

Background

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a life-saving measure for traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, survivors may remain in a vegetative or minimally conscious state and require tracheostomy to facilitate airway management. In this cross-sectional analytical study, we investigated the predictors for tracheostomy requirement and influence of tracheostomy timing on outcomes in craniectomised survivors after TBI.

Methods

We enrolled 160 patients undergoing DC and surviving >7 days after TBI in this 3-year retrospective study. The patients were subdivided into 2 groups based on whether tracheostomy was (N = 38) or was not (N = 122) performed. We identified intergroup differences in early clinical parameters. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for independent predictors of the need for tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy was defined as the performance of the procedure within the first 10 days after DC. Intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, mortality, and Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) were analysed according to the timing of the tracheostomy procedure.

Results

After TBI, 24% of craniectomised survivors required tracheostomy. In the multivariate logistic regression mode, the significant factors related to the need for tracheostomy were age (odds ratio = 1.041; p = 0.002), the Glasgow coma score (GCS) at admission (odds ratio = 0.733; p = 0.005), and normal status of basal cisterns (odds ratio = 0.000; p = 0.008). The ICU stay was shorter for patients with early tracheostomy than for those undergoing late tracheostomy (p = 0.004). The timing of tracheostomy had no influence on the hospital stay, mortality, or GOS.

Conclusion

Age and admission GCS were independent predictors of the need for tracheostomy in craniectomised survivors after TBI. If tracheostomy is necessary, an earlier procedure may assist in patient care.     

Is delayed fixation worthwhile in patients with long bone fracture concomitant with mild traumatic brain injury? A propensity score–matched study

IntroductionEarly definite treatment for orthopedic patients is strongly advocated. However, a consensus has not been reached on the optimal timing of long bone fracture fixation for patients with associated mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). Surgeons lack evidence on the basis on which they should decide on the operation timing.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with mild TBI and lower extremity long bone fractures from 2010 to 2020. The patients receiving internal fixation within and after 24 h were defined as the early- and delayed-fixation groups. We compared the discharge Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, lengths of stay, and in-hospital complications. Propensity score matching (PSM) with multiple adjusted variables and a 1:1 matching ratio was applied to reduce selection bias.ResultsIn total, 181 patients were enrolled; 78 (43.1%) and 103 (56.9%) patients received early and delayed fracture fixation, respectively. After matching, each group had 61 participants and were statistically identical. The delayed group did not have better discharge GCS scores (early vs. delayed: 15.0 ± 0 vs. 15.0 ± 0.1; p = 0.158). The groups did not differ in their lengths of hospital stay (15.3 ± 10.6 vs. 14.8 ± 7.9; p = 0.789), intensive care unit stay (2.7 ± 4.3 vs. 2.7 ± 3.8; p = 0.947), or incidence of complications (23.0% vs. 16.4%; p = 0.494).ConclusionsDelayed fixation for patients with lower extremity long bone fractures concurrent with mild TBI does not result in fewer complications or improved neurologic outcomes compared with early fixation. Delaying fixation may not be necessary to prevent the second hit phenomenon and has not demonstrated any clear benefits.     

RIB fracture triage pathway decreases ICU utilization,pulmonary complications and hospital length of stay

IntroductionRib fractures are one of the most frequent causes of morbidity following blunt injury to the chest. Many of these patients require ICU care and often develop pulmonary complications. Prior studies have attempted to identify changes in predicted lung volumes or utilized the number of rib fractures to guide clinical decisions. A rib fracture triage pathway was developed to identify which patients will benefit from ICU level of care and shorten hospital length of stay for patients that do not require ICU care.MethodsThe triage pathway utilized patient's age, number of rib fractures, significant cardiopulmonary co-morbidities, and incentive spirometry volumes to determine admission disposition. The triage pathway was implemented on November 2016. All patients with rib fractures from November 2015 to 2017 were identified in the trauma registry. Data was collected on patients age, gender, Glasgow Coma Scale on arrival (GCS), injury severity score (ISS), number of rib fractures, incentive spirometry volumes, days in intensive care (ICU), ventilator days, length of stay (LOS), complications, and mortality. Patients with severe TBI, those arriving intubated, or died within 48 h were excluded. The patients remaining were 278 patients in the pre triage pathway group and 370 in the post triage pathway.ResultsThere was no difference in age, gender, GCS, ISS, predicted incentive spirometry or number of rib fractures. The post treatment patients required significantly lower ICU admissions (64% vs 75%, p = 0.003), significantly lower pulmonary complication (5.1% vs 10.4%, p = 0.01), and significantly shorter hospital length of stay (6.8 d vs 7.5, p = 0.001) with no difference in mortality (1.6% vs 2.5%, p = 0.42) or readmission (0.3% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.4). Patient post triage protocol were also more likely to be discharge home (81% vs 70%, p = 0.0009) with less patients going to a skilled nursing facility (13% vs 21%, p = 0.01).ConclusionsDeveloping a rib fracture treatment and triage pathway can decrease ICU and hospital resource utilization and decrease pulmonary complications without increase in readmissions or mortality. Patients are more likely to be discharge home over a skilled nursing facility further decreasing health care cost. Level of Evidence IV Retrospective Study, Prognostic     

High flow nasal cannula outside the ICU provides optimal care and maximizes hospital resources for patients with multiple rib fractures

BackgroundHigh flow nasal cannula (HFNC) use reduces work of breathing and improves oxygenation for patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure. Limited prior work has explored protocolized use of HFNC for trauma patients outside the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The purpose of this study is to describe and evaluate use of HFNC for patients with rib fractures when therapy was standard of care on all floors of the hospital.MethodsIn 2018, the study hospital expanded use of HFNC (AIRVO; Fisher Paykel, Auckland, NZ) to all floors of the hospital, making it available in the ICU, Emergency Department (ED), and on general inpatient floors. The study group included adult patients with three or more rib fractures who received HFNC at any location in the hospital (Phase 2: January 2018-December 2019). The study group was compared to a historical control group when HFNC was available only in the ICU (Phase 1: March 2013-July 2015). Patients were excluded from the study if they received invasive mechanical ventilation prior to HFNC. Primary outcomes were mechanical ventilation rates, ICU days, length of hospitalization, and mortality.ResultsDuring the study period, 63 patients received HFNC, with 35% of patients (n = 22) receiving the duration of therapy outside the ICU. When compared to the control group (N = 63), there were no significant differences in total hospital days (9 vs. 9, p=.64), mechanical ventilation (19% vs. 13%, p=.47), or mortality (3% vs. 5%, p = 1.00). Twenty-seven percent of patients (n = 17) in the study group avoided the ICU during hospitalization.ConclusionsFindings suggest that HFNC therapy can be safely initiated and managed on all hospital floors for patients with multiple rib fractures. Making the therapy available outside the ICU may reduce healthcare resource use without adversely affecting patient outcomes.     

Long term outcomes following rib fracture fixation in patients with major chest trauma

BackgroundSevere chest injuries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Surgical rib fixation has become a more commonplace procedure to improve chest wall mechanics, pain, and function. The aim of this study was to characterise the epidemiology and long-term functional outcomes of chest trauma patients who underwent rib fixation in a major trauma centre (MTC).MethodologyThis was a retrospective review (2014–19) of all adult patients with significant chest injury who had rib fixation surgery following blunt trauma to the chest. The primary outcome was functional recovery after hospital discharge, and secondary outcomes included length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, maximum organ support, tracheostomy insertion, ventilator days.Results60 patients underwent rib fixation. Patients were mainly male (82%) with median age 52 (range 24–83) years, injury severity score (ISS) of 29 (21–38), 10 (4–19) broken ribs, and flail segment in 90% of patients. Forty-six patients (77%) had a good outcome (GOSE grade 6–8). Patients in the poor outcome group (23%; GOSE 1–5) tended to be older [55 (39–83) years vs. 51 (24–78); p = 0.05] and had longer length of hospital stay [42 (19–82) days vs. 24 (7–90); p<0.01]. Injury severity, rate of mechanical ventilation or organ dysfunction did not affect long term outcome. Nineteen patients (32%) were not mechanically ventilated.ConclusionsRib fixation was associated with good long-term outcomes in severely injured patients. Age was the only predictor of long-term outcome. The results suggest that rib fixation be considered in patients with severe chest injuries and may also benefit those who are not mechanically ventilated but are at risk of deterioration.     

Hirschsprung disease in Down syndrome: An opportunity for improvement

BackgroundDown syndrome (DS) is the most common abnormality associated with Hirschsprung disease (HD). It has been suggested patients with HD and DS have worse outcomes, however the literature is controversial.MethodsThe Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID) from 2003 to 2012 was used to identify newborns with HD. Demographics, hospital characteristics, and outcomes were compared among patients with and without DS using standard statistical tests.ResultsThere were 481 patients identified with HD, of which 45 (9%) had DS. Patients with DS were older at the time of first rectal biopsy (6 [3–11] days vs. 4 [3–6] days, p = 0.012). There were no differences in operative versus non-operative management in patients with and without DS (p = 0.706). Hospital length of stay was longer in the DS cohort (22 [13–33] days vs. 15 [10–24] days, p = 0.019), and patients with DS were more likely to have a concomitant diagnosis of wound infection (<12% vs. 3%, p = 0.002) and necrotizing enterocolitis (<14% vs. 5%, p = 0.018). The mortality rate for patients with DS was four times higher than those without DS (< 5% vs. < 0.8%, p = 0.018).ConclusionIn this nationwide cohort of patients with Hirschsprung disease, those with Down syndrome experienced delays in diagnosis and worse outcomes.Level of evidenceLevel III.Type of studyTreatment study, retrospective comparative study.     

Initial experience of Chinese surgical robot “Micro Hand S″-assisted versus open and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes in a single center

BackgroundA Chinese surgical robot, Micro Hand S, was introduced for clinical use as a novel robotic platform. This study aimed to comprehensively compare the early experience of the Micro Hand S robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) with conventional approaches.MethodsBetween May 2017 and April 2018, 99 consecutive patients who underwent open, laparoscopic and Micro Hand S robot-assisted TME (O-/L-/RTME) for rectal cancer were included. Clinical and pathological outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical success as the primary endpoint was defined as the absence of (i) conversion, (ii) incomplete TME, (iii) involved circumferential and distal resection margins (CRM/DRM), (iv) severe complications.ResultsThe rate of surgical success was similar (89.7 vs. 86.4 vs. 84.6%, p = 0.851) in the three groups and the respective incidences were as follows: conversion (not applicable, 4.5 vs. 2.3%, p = 1.000), incomplete TME (6.9 vs. 6.8 vs. 3.8%, p = 0.980), involved CRM/DRM (0 vs. 2.3 vs. 3.8%, p = 0.592), severe complications (3.4 vs. 4.5 vs. 7.7%, p = 0.844). Compared with open and laparoscopic surgery, the robotic surgery was associated with longer operative time, less blood loss, earlier first flatus time and liquid intake time, and shorter length of hospital stay (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThe Micro Hand S assisted TME is safe and feasible, showing comparable outcomes than conventional approaches, with superiority in blood loss, recovery of bowel function, length of hospital stay, but with increased operative time.     

Intercostal nerve cryoablation during surgical stabilization of rib fractures decreases post-operative opioid use,ventilation days,and intensive care days

BackgroundIntercostal nerve cryoablation is an adjunctive measure that has demonstrated pain control, decrease in opioid consumption, and decrease in hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients who undergo surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF).MethodsSSRF patients from January 2015 to September 2021 were retrospectively compared. All patients received multimodal pain regimens post-operatively and the independent variable was intraoperative cryoablation.Results241 patients met inclusion criteria. 51 (21%) underwent intra-operative cryoablation during SSRF and 191 (79%) did not. Patients with standard treatment consumed 9.4 more daily MME (p = 0.035), consumed 73 percent more post-operative total MME (p = 0.001), spent 1.55 times as many days in the intensive care unit (p = 0.013), and spent 3.8 times as many days on the ventilator than patients treated with cryoablation, respectively. Overall hospital LOS, operative case time, pulmonary complications, MME at discharge, and numeric pain scores at discharge were no different (all p>0.05).ConclusionIntercostal nerve cryoablation during SSRF is associated with fewer ventilator days, ICU LOS, total post-operative, and daily opioid use without increasing time in the operating room or perioperative pulmonary complications.     

Laparoscopic versus Open Approach for Aortobifemoral Bypass for Severe Aorto-iliac Occlusive Disease – A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

ObjectivesTo investigate differences between open and laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass surgery for aorto-iliac occlusive disease on postoperative morbidity and mortality.DesignA multicentre randomised controlled trial.MethodsBetween January 2007 and November 2009, 28 patients with severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease (TASC II C or D) were randomised between laparoscopic and open approach at one community hospital and one university hospital (TASC = Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus on the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease).ResultsThe operation time was longer for the laparoscopic approach (mean 4 h 19 min (2 h 00 min to 6 h 20 min) vs. 3 h 30 min (1 h 42 min to 5 h 11 min); p = 0.101)). Nevertheless, postoperative recovery and in-hospital stay were significantly shorter after laparoscopic surgery. Also oral intake could be restarted earlier (mean 20 h 34 min (6 h 00 min to 26 h 55 min) vs. 43 h 43 min (19 h 40 min to 77 h 30 min); p = 0.00014)) as well as postoperative mobilisation (walking) (mean 46 h 15 min (16 h 07 min to 112 h 40 min) vs. mean 94 h 14 min (66 h 10 min to 127 h 23 min); p = 0.00016)). Length of hospitalisation was shorter (mean 5.5 days (2.5–15) vs. mean 13.0 days (7–45); p = 0.0095)). Visual pain scores and visual discomfort scores were both lower after laparoscopic surgery. Also return to normal daily activities was achieved earlier. There were no major complications in both groups.ConclusionLaparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass surgery for aorto-iliac occlusive disease is a safe procedure with a significant decrease in postoperative morbidity and in-hospital stay and earlier recovery.     

Factors related to length of hospital stay after two-stage corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity in elderly Japanese

BackgroundPostoperative recovery of activities of daily living after surgery in elderly patients often takes a longer time because of their frailty. However, it is unclear how long it takes for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) to recover their abilities to live their daily lives in their home after corrective fusion surgery. This study aimed to investigate the length of hospital stay required to perform activities of daily living (ADL) in patients undergoing two-stage corrective fusion surgery for ASD in our institution and to detect factors associated with the length of hospital stay.MethodsThirty-four consecutive female ASD patients (median age, 70 years) who underwent two-stage corrective fusion surgery (lateral lumbar interbody fusion at the first stage and posterior corrective fusion at the second stage) from T9 or T10 to the pelvis were included. The length of hospital stay from admission to return home was determined, and correlations between length of hospital stay and demographics, skeletal muscle mass, operative invasion and perioperative complications, and spino-pelvic alignment were investigated.ResultsThe median length of hospital stay was 51 days, exceeding 100 days in 25% of cases. Age at surgery (ρ = 0.545, p = 0.001), estimated glomerular filtration rate (ρ = ?0.603, p < 0.001), age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ρ = 0.437, p = 0.01), and preoperative pelvic incidence (ρ = 0.356, p = 0.04) were correlated with length of hospital stay. Preoperative skeletal muscle mass, preoperative spinal imbalance, perioperative changes in spino-pelvic alignment, operative invasion, and perioperative complications were not correlated with length of hospital stay.ConclusionsAfter >50 days, ADL performance of each patient reached the extent required for daily living to return home after two-stage corrective fusion surgery for ASD. Factors related to length of hospital stay were age and indices related to frailty.