Incidence of self-inflicted burn injury in patients with Major Psychiatric Illness

IntroductionPsychiatric disorders are mental illnesses that impair judgment, thought process and mood that can result in physical and emotional disability. According to DSM-IV, mental disorders increases risk of traumatic injury, particularly burn [1] (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). However, there are few studies that look at patients with pre-existing major psychiatric disorders and burn outcomes. We aim to assess the incidence and intentionality of burn injury in patients with pre-existing psychiatric disorders.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of patients admitted to the UNC Jaycee Burn Center from 2002 to 2015 and entered in the burn registry. Variables analyzed include basic demographics, insurance status, total body surface area (TBSA) of burn, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), burn etiology, presence of inhalation injury, burn circumstance, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality. Chi-square, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Kruskal–Wallis test and Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the data.Results11,650 adult and pediatric patients were entered in the burn registry from 2002 to 2015 and 494 (4.2%) adult and pediatric patients had preexisting major psychiatric illness (MPI). Within the large cohort of admitted burn patients, 90 (0.8%) patients presented with self-inflicted burn injuries. 41% of patients with SIB (n = 37/90) had MPI. The incidence of self-inflicted burn injury (SIB) within the MPI (n = 494) cohort was 7.5% (n = 37). Mean age of patients with and without self-inflicted burn injury was 35.3 (±11.6) vs. 41.8 (±17.3), respectively. Mean TBSA was significantly higher in patient with SIB at 18.6 (±16.5) vs. 8.5(±12.2) p < 0.001. Non-white race had significantly higher rate of SIB compared to white cohort. There was no significant difference in mortality rates between SIB and Non-SIB (5.4% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.609), respectively. Median Hospital LOS was significantly increased in patients with SIB compared to NSIB 31 (IQR = 55) vs. 9 (IQR = 20) days, p = 0.004. Multivariate logistic regression for predictors of self-inflicted burn injury showed that minorities were more likely to incur self-inflicted burn injury among patients with major psychiatric illnesses.ConclusionThe incidence of self-induced burn injury in patients with MPI is low and of all the self-inflicted burn patients, 60% did not have a major psychiatric illness identified. Our findings emphasize the importance of identifying patients with MPI with or without self-induced injury that may benefit from more extensive psychiatric screening after burn and counseling, particularly minority patients as they may benefit from additional mental health counseling following severe burn.     

Outcomes following burn injury in intensive care patients with major psychiatric disorders

AimsPatients with psychiatric comorbidity have been shown to experience high rates of burn injury. Burn epidemiology, etiology, and outcomes have been sparsely documented for patients with major psychiatric disorders. The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiologic characteristics and outcomes in intensive care burn patients with pre-existing and acute major psychiatric disorders .MethodsA retrospective study was performed including intensive care burn patients admitted between March 2007 and December 2020. Demographic, clinical and epidemiological data were collected and analyzed. Major psychiatric co-morbidities were collected according to ICD-9 and ICD-10 classifications. Patients were stratified according to F-diagnoses.ResultsA total of 1325 patients were included. 16.6 % of all patients had one or more major psychiatric disorders- 9.3 % with anxiety, dissociative, stress-related, somatoform and other nonpsychotic mental disorders, 9.2 % with mood (affective) disorders, 3.5 % with schizophrenia and other non-mood psychotic disorders, and 1.8 % with disorders of adult personality and behavior. Patients with major psychiatric disorders presented with significantly higher burn severity, reflected by higher abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI) scores (5.9 vs. 5.3, p < 0.001) and larger total body surface area (TBSA) affected (15.9 vs. 12.5 %, p = 0.002). Burned TBSA ≥ 30 and inhalation injuries were observed more frequently in patients with MDP, however without statistical significance. They also experienced prolonged hospital length-of-stay (LOS) (25.5 vs. 16.3 days, p < 0.001), prolonged intensive care unit LOS (14.8 vs. 7.7 days, p < 0.001), underwent surgical interventions (3.5 vs. 2.3, p < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation more frequently (34.1 % vs. 16.5 %, p = 0.43) and had significantly longer ventilation durations (73.5 vs. 31.2 h, p = 0.002). Mortality rates were lower compared to patients without major psychiatric disorders (5.9 vs. 8.1, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe prevalence of major psychiatric disorders in burn patients is considerably high. Patients with psychiatric comorbidities were found to have greater burn severity, prolonged total hospital and ICU LOS, underwent surgical interventions and mechanical ventilation more frequently and had prolonged ventilation duration. Our results highlight the importance of identifying burn patients with major psychiatric disorders who may necessitate additional resources and require extensive inpatient psychiatric care and counseling.     

The influence of pre-existing psychiatric illness on recovery in burn injury patients: the impact of psychosis and depression

We hypothesised that patients with a co-morbid psychiatric illness would show poorer outcomes in recovery from their burn injury compared to patients with equivalent burn injury but without a pre-existing psychiatric illness. A secondary aim was to investigate the effect of self-inflicted burn injury. Consecutive admissions (n = 190) to a burns inpatient unit were screened for the existence of a formal pre-burn psychiatric disorder. Nine patients suffering from psychosis and eight suffering from depression were matched with 18 and 15 patients, respectively not suffering a pre-burn psychiatric disorder on gender, age, burn severity, type, depth and location. Patients with a pre-burn psychiatric diagnosis spent significantly longer in hospital, spent more time in care until discharged from outreach and their burn injuries took longer to heal than matched burn injury patients without a pre-existing psychiatric illness. Time in hospital and to wound healing were significantly greater in psychotic patients compared to their controls but not between depressed patients and their matched controls. Both psychotic and depressed patients had significantly more surgery than their matched controls. Patients whose burn was self-inflicted spent significantly longer in hospital and their wounds took longer to heal. Patients with pre-existing psychiatric conditions, especially psychosis, and those with self-inflicted injuries are associated with difficulties in clinical management and higher economic cost yet staff receive very little specialist training in their management.     

A study of energy-related injuries from hospital admissions among children and adults in South Africa

Introduction

Burn and ingestion injuries are common in developing countries because of poor access to safe energy sources, crowded living conditions, and insufficient knowledge of potential risks. The purpose of this study is to understand the scope of burn and ingestion injuries due to various energy source usages in South Africa.

Methods

Patients at 16 regional hospitals throughout South Africa presenting with an energy-related injury between 2006 and 2012 were interviewed to obtain demographics and injury characteristics.

Results

A total of 12,443 patients were included in this study. Children aged 1–2 years predominantly experienced burn and ingestion injuries (21%). Liquid burns (30%) were more common than flame burns (14%). Chi-squared tests show that age was significantly related to degree of burn, type of burn, and severity of burn (p < 0.001). Non-intentional injuries (45%) were more frequent than self-inflicted or assault injuries. Temporal and seasonal injury trends reflect usage patterns. Burn injuries result in longer hospital length of stay than ingestion injuries.

Conclusion

Non-intentional liquid burns and ingestions to infants and babies were most common in this study, with many injuries also occurring among young adults. It is advised that interventions targeting low-income communities be conducted to increase awareness of burn and ingestion injuries.     

How self-inflicted injury and gender impacted the outcome following a severe burn

BackgroundA high prevalence of self-inflicted burn injury is noted in severe burn injury. It remains unclear as to whether gender and past psychiatric history impact upon whether injury is self-inflicted and the outcomes.AimsReview the psychiatric history of patients treated in a statewide burn service following severe burn injury and determine whether psychiatric history, extent of burn and mortality are impacted by gender and whether the injury was self-inflicted.MethodA data linkage study was performed with psychiatric history and mental health service contact data matched to patients’ data collected via a previous retrospective file audit. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression modelling measured interactions between gender and self-inflicted burn status, and other study outcomes.ResultsIn total, 298 patients (47 with a self-inflicted burn) were admitted following a severe burn. Patients with self-inflicted burns were significantly more likely to have total body surface area burn of at least 50% (OR = 9.3; 95%CI: 4.7–18.5) and die within 24 h of admission (OR = 10.5; 95%CI:4.7–23.2). They were significantly more likely to have a past psychiatric diagnosis and public mental health service contact in the month pre-injury (OR = 18.9; 95%CI: 7.5–47.2). Male patients had significantly lower rates of a psychiatric diagnosis and recent mental health service contact. Males with self-inflicted injury are far more likely to die than males with a non-self-inflicted injury.ConclusionsPsychiatric clinicians should assertively screen the psychiatric history of patients with severe burn injury, and participate in the acute and longer-term management of persons admitted with a self-inflicted burn.     

Self-inflicted burns: A case series

Self-inflicted burns are regularly admitted to burns units worldwide. Most of these patients are referred to psychiatric services and are successfully treated however some return to hospital with recurrent self-inflicted burns. The aim of this study is to explore the characteristics of the recurrent self-inflicted burn patients admitted to the Royal North Shore Hospital during 2004–2011. Burn patients were drawn from a computerized database and recurrent self-inflicted burn patients were identified. Of the total of 1442 burn patients, 40 (2.8%) were identified as self-inflicted burns. Of these patients, 5 (0.4%) were identified to have sustained previous self-inflicted burns and were interviewed by a psychiatrist. Each patient had been diagnosed with a borderline personality disorder and had suffered other forms of deliberate self-harm. Self-inflicted burns were utilized to relieve or help regulate psychological distress, rather than to commit suicide. Most patients had a history of emotional neglect, physical and/or sexual abuse during their early life experience. Following discharge from hospital, the patients described varying levels of psychiatric follow-up, from a post-discharge review at a local community mental health centre to twice-weekly psychotherapy. The patients who engaged in regular psychotherapy described feeling more in control of their emotions and reported having a longer period of abstinence from self-inflicted burn. Although these patients represent a small proportion of all burns, the repeat nature of their injuries led to a significant use of clinical resources. A coordinated and consistent treatment pathway involving surgical and psychiatric services for recurrent self-inflicted burns may assist in the management of these challenging patients.     

Adult kitchen-related burn injuries: The impact of COVID-19

IntroductionKitchen-related burn injuries are common and preventable. To limit the spread of COVID-19, public health orders encouraged the public to stay at home which may have led to an increase in kitchen-related burn injuries.ObjectiveTo assess adult kitchen-related burns treated in an outpatient setting in general, and especially looking at the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence and epidemiology of these burns.MethodsFor this retrospective, population-based study, data were obtained for adult patients who suffered burn injuries resulting in a visit to a Canadian tertiary Burn Clinic between April 2016 and March 2021 specifically looking at demographics, burn etiology, severity and anatomical location and the need for surgery. Separately, we compared the patients before and after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic (April 1, 2020).ResultsA total of 1380 burn patients were identified. Of these, 38 % (N = 521) sustained a kitchen-related burn. The median patient age was 40 years (range 18–95) and 282 (54.1 %) were female. The most common etiology and location were scald (76.8 %) and anterior arm (28.5 %), respectively. Thirty-two (6.1 %) patients required admission to the Burn Unit and 26 of these had surgeries. Additionally, 72 (13.8 %) patients had surgery as an outpatient. During the COVID-19 pandemic, East Asian patients saw a significant increase in kitchen burns (p < 0.01).ConclusionOver 1/3 of burns at the outpatient burn clinic were kitchen-related. About 94 % of these were treated as outpatient only. The incidence of kitchen-related burns did not change during the COVID-19 pandemic, but we found significant differences in ethnic distribution. These results provide a unique opportunity to focus on communication and education and set up preventative measures.     

Dimensions of burn survivor distress and its impact on hospital length of stay: A national institute on disability,independent living,and rehabilitation research burn model system study

ObjectiveGuided by the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping, this study seeks to (1) examine the independent relationships between the level of distress among burn survivors, pre-morbid psychiatric history, and burn severity on length of hospital stay, and (2) to examine the relationship between having a premorbid psychiatric history and level of distress following a burn injury.MethodsData collected by the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, Rehabilitation Research funded Burn Model System (N = 846) was used to theoretically link psychological distress with the length of hospital stay for survivors of burn injuries. Structural Equation Modeling was used to evaluate the aims of this study.ResultsAlthough counterintuitive, and while significant, burn severity was found to have a rather modest association with a burn survivor’s level of distress, indicating that one’s ability to cope may be a better predictor of distress rather than burn severity alone. Premorbid psychiatric history was significantly associated with increased levels of distress. While burn severity was associated with length of stay, level of distress did not act as a partial mediator. Length of stay was, however, significantly related to having a premorbid-psychiatric history. Of notable interest, a significant racial, ethnic, and gender difference exists in level of distress. Women and people of color experience higher levels of distress holding constant burn severity and psychiatric history.ConclusionA need exists to assess for and address premorbid and current mental health challenges of burn survivors, specifically the ability to cope, especially among people of color and women, regardless of the burn size or severity.     

Medicolegal evaluation of cases with burn trauma: Accident or physical abuse

Introduction and objectiveBurns are thermal injuries that may have a wide variety of clinical consequences from simple injuries to mortality. There are many aspects that must be medicolegally addressed in both non-survivors and survivors from burn injuries. The objective of this study was to determine sociodemographic characteristics, injury patterns, treatment requirements and prognoses of patients with burn injuries to evaluate the findings of neglect-abuse and forensic reporting processes. This study also aimed to contribute to the medicolegal classification criteria in respect of the factors that have an effect on the prognosis in the analyses.Material and methodThe study was conducted by retrospective review of digital files and paper records of patients who received therapy in the Burns Unit of KTU Farabi Hospital between 1st January, 2013, and 31st December, 2017.ResultsEvaluation was made of a total of 1225 patients, comprising 769 (62.8%) males and 456 (37.2%) females, with a mean age of 21.8 ± 23.8 years (range, 1–89 years). The mean burnt body surface area was 14.29 ± 13.74. A trauma-related psychiatric disorder was diagnosed in 60 (4.9%) patients during treatment. When the medical history and physical examination findings were evaluated together, burn injuries suggested physical abuse in 54 patients (4.4%). The doctors who evaluated the patients with burn injuries in the emergency room and those who applied treatment in the Burns Unit made a forensic notification for 379 (30.9%) patients. The mean age of non-survivors was significantly higher than that of patients who survived to discharge (56.54 ± 28.60 years for non-survivors and 19.39 ± 23.12 years for survivors; p < 0.001).ConclusionBurn injuries are frequently encountered, and they require precautionary measures. Burn injuries due to abuse are more frequently observed in the elderly and especially in children. Thus, the findings must be correctly interpreted, and more effort should be made to improve the knowledge of healthcare professionals about forensic reporting. Moreover, regulations should be implemented in respect of the medicolegal classification of trauma.     

Disparities in disposition from trauma centers to inpatient psychiatric treatment in a national sample of patients with self-inflicted injury

BackgroundSurgery providers are integral to the treatment of patients with self-inflicted injuries. Patient disposition (eg, home, inpatient psychiatric treatment, rehabilitation) is important to long-term outcomes, but little is known about factors influencing disposition after discharge following traumatic self-inflicted injury. We tested whether patient or injury characteristics were associated with disposition after treatment for self-inflicted injury.MethodsNational Trauma Data Bank query for self-inflicted injuries from 2010 to 2018.ResultsThere were 77,731 patients treated for self-inflicted injuries during the study period. Discharge home was the most common disposition (45%), and those without insurance were less likely to discharge to inpatient psychiatric treatment than those with insurance. Racial minority patients were less likely to discharge to inpatient psychiatric treatment (18.9%) than nonminority patients (23.8%, P < .001). Additionally, patients discharged to inpatient psychiatric treatment had significantly lower injury severity score (7.24 ± 7.5) than those who did not (8.69 ± 9.1, P < .001).ConclusionRacial/ethnic minority patients and those without insurance were significantly less likely to discharge to an inpatient psychiatric facility after treatment at a trauma center for self-inflicted injury. Future research is needed to evaluate the internal factors (eg, trauma center practices) and external factors (eg, inpatient psychiatric facilities not accepting patients with wound care needs) driving disposition variability.     

Adult burn injuries due to domestic barbeques in New South Wales

PurposeBurn injuries associated with domestic barbeques were responsible for 80 admissions to Concord Hospital Burns Unit during the period from January 1998 until December 2007. In our series the number of burn injuries associated with domestic barbeques is increasing and we have reviewed the records of these patients to document their injuries and identify possible causes.MethodsThe database of the unit was reviewed for all admissions resulting from domestic barbeques from January 1998 until December 2007. Patients whose injuries resulted from bonfires, camping or other domestic fires were excluded from the study.ResultsThe number of barbeque related burn injuries has increased as has the incidence of burns associated with gas fired barbeques. Young adult males predominate. Injuries ranged from 2 to 65% TBSA and 34% required intubation. There were 10 major complications with one death and 20% of patients required grafting. Length of stay varied from 1 to 51 days.ConclusionsIn this series the number of admissions resulting from both wood fired and gas barbeques has increased. The cause of injury in open fires is associated with misuse of accelerants, whilst the cause of injury in gas barbeques is mainly due to delayed ignition of gas or incorrect use of the appliance. Distribution and severity of injuries are similar.     

Disparities affecting incarcerated burn-injured patients: Insight from the National Burn Repository

ObjectiveIncarcerated patients are a vulnerable population and little is known regarding the epidemiology of burn injury and subsequent outcomes. This study utilizes a national database to assess disparities in care affecting this understudied population.MethodsThe National Burn Repository was queried for adult patients discharged into custody. Patients discharged to jail were compared to those with other dispositions. Additional analysis of the incarcerated patients compared those injured while in custody to those injured prior to incarceration.ResultsBetween 2002–2011, 809 patients were discharged to jail with 283 (35.0%) sustaining these injuries while in custody. Patients were predominantly male (86.2%) and White (52.3%), with median age 35.7 years (IQR 27.7–45.9). Incarcerated patients had significantly higher rates of drug abuse and psychiatric illness. They had significantly smaller burns (2.0% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.001) and were less likely to undergo an operation but had comparable lengths of stay in the hospital.ConclusionsAlthough incarcerated burn-injured patients sustain smaller injuries and receive fewer operations they remain hospitalized for similar durations as non-incarcerated patients. Enhanced understanding of burn etiologies and injury characteristics as well as improved insight into the impact of psychosocial factors such as substance abuse and prevalence of psychiatric disorders may help improve care.     

Demographic risk factors of self-immolation: A case–control study

ObjectiveTo investigate demographic risk factors for self-immolation patients.MethodsIn a case–control study, 30 consecutive cases of deliberate self-inflicted burns admitted to the regional Burn centre (Imam Khomeini hospital in Kermanshah province, Iran) were compared with 30 controls who were selected from the community and matched by gender, age, and living area. All cases and controls were reviewed for demographic variables, including: age, gender, living area, family size, marital status, bearing and number of children, Body Mass Index (BMI), birth order, employment state, educational status, early school drop-out, and parent/guardian employment status.ResultsTwo variables emerged as related to risk of self-immolation. Being the first or last child in family birth order was associated with increased risk of self-immolation. Moreover, among the married participants, having children was associated with decreased risk of self-immolation. The comparisons of other variables were not statistically significant. In multivariate analyses, none of the variables predicted risk for self-immolation.ConclusionThis study suggests that being the first or last child of a family might be a risk factor for self-immolation. For married persons, having children might serve as a protective factor from self-immolation. Other variables such as family size, marital status, number of children, BMI, employment state, educational status, early school drop-out, and parent/guardian employment status did not play a role as individually protective or risk factors for self-immolation.     

In-hospital outcomes of paediatric burn injuries managed in children’s hospitals compared to general hospitals

IntroductionIn Australia and New Zealand, children with burn injuries are cared for in either general hospitals which cater to both adult and paediatric burn injuries or in children’s hospitals. Few publications have attempted to analyse modern burn care and outcomes as a function of treating facilities.AimThe aim of this study was to compare in-hospital outcomes of paediatric burn injuries managed in children’s hospitals to those treated in general hospitals that regularly treated both adult and paediatric burn patients.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of cases was undertaken using data from the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand (BRANZ). All paediatric patients with data for an acute or transfer admission to a BRANZ hospital and registered with BRANZ with a date of admission between 1 July 2016 and 30 June 2020 were included in the study. The primary outcome of interest was the acute admission length of stay. Secondary outcome measures of interest included admission to the intensive care unit and readmission to a specialist burn service within 28 days. The Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee granted ethical approval for this study (project 629/21).ResultsA total of 4630 paediatric burn patients were included in the analysis. Approximately three quarters of this cohort (n = 3510, 75.8%) were admitted to a paediatric only hospital, while the remaining quarter (n = 1120, 24.2%) were admitted to a general hospital. A greater proportion of patients admitted to general hospitals underwent burn wound management procedures in the operating theatre (general hospitals 83.9%, children’s hospitals 71.4%, p < 0.001). Patients admitted to children’s hospitals had a longer median time to their first episode of grafting (children’s hospitals 12.4 days, general hospitals 8.3 days, p < 0.001). The adjusted regression model for hospital LOS indicate that patients admitted to general hospitals had a 23% shorter hospital LOS, compared to patients admitted to children’s hospitals. Neither the unadjusted or adjusted model for intensive care unit admission was significant. After accounting for relevant confounding factors, there was no association between service type and hospital readmission rates.ConclusionsComparing children’s hospitals and general hospitals, different models of care seem to exist. Burn services in children’s hospitals adopted a more conservative approach and were more inclined to facilitate healing by secondary intention rather than surgical debridement and grafting. General hospitals are more “aggressive” in managing burn wounds in theatre early, and debriding and grafting the burn wounds whenever considered necessary.     

Burn injuries in primary care in the Netherlands: Risk factors and trends

BackgroundResearch to date has mainly focused on burn injuries treated in secondary care. This study aims to provide knowledge on the epidemiology of burn injuries in primary care, to give directions for burn prevention.MethodsData were derived from routine electronic health records of general practices and their out-of-hours service organisations in the Netherlands that participated in the Nivel Primary Care Database 2010–2015. We studied risk factors and trends.ResultsThe average burn injury prevalence rate was 4.40 (95% CI 4.27–4.53) per 1000 person-years in daytime general practice care and 1.47 (95% CI 1.46–1.49) per 1000 inhabitants in out-of-hours care. Children of 0?4 years old, especially boys, and young adult women had a higher risk. Burn injury risk was higher during the summer months and around New Year’s Eve. Living in low socioeconomic and strongly urbanised neighbourhoods was associated with a higher risk of burn injury than living in other neighbourhoods.ConclusionDutch general practitioners have a large share in burn care and therefore can play a significant role in burn prevention. Prevention may be most effective in the summer and around New Year’s Eve, and specific attention seems to be warranted for low socioeconomic groups and strongly urbanised neighbourhoods.     

The association between burn and trauma severity and in-hospital complications

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the association between in-hospital complications and burn and trauma severity, inhalation injury, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and mortality in burned patients.MethodThis observational and retrospective study included 68 burn patients hospitalized in a university hospital located in São Paulo, Brazil. The severity of the burn injury and trauma were measured by means of Abbreviated Injury Scale and the Injury Severity Score, respectively. Thecomplications were considered as a dependent variable. The statistical analysis for continuous variables was performed using the Student‘s t or the Mann–Whitney test and for categorical variables the Chi-square test, Fisher’s Exact or Verisimilitude Ratio test, considering a significance level of 5%.ResultsThe majority (60.3%) of patients had complications, and among them, those with infections were the most frequent (70.7%). Burned patients with complications had higher burn injury severity, were hospitalized for longer and their mortality was higher. Cardiovascular complications were associated with severe burns and mortality; infectious ones with a larger length of hospitalization.ConclusionComplications are frequent in patients with severe burns and inhalation injuries, increasing length of hospital stay and mortality. Burn studies measuring severity of thermal and inhalation injuries and other associated traumas allow to expand the analysis of burned patients.     

Changes in the epidemiologic profile of burn patients during the lockdown in Catalonia (Spain): A warning call to strengthen prevention strategies in our community

BackgroundThe worldwide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, is the defining global health crisis of our time. Spain has had one of the highest burdens of COVID-19 worldwide.During this period, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital Burn Center (Barcelona) has faced a unique challenge: supporting the hospital response against COVID whilst continued offering an optimal care to the burn patient.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to characterize the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of acute burn patients who received urgent health care or admission to the our Burn Center during the mandatory confinement period in Spain forced by the COVID-19 epidemic.MethodsWe analyzed the medical records of burn patients who received urgent care and/or admission to our Burn Center during the mandatory confinement period in Spain (Period 1: from March 14th to May 9th, 2020) and during the same period of the last year (Period 2: from March 14th to May 9th, 2019). Both groups were compared in order to find differences in the epidemiologic profile of burned patients.ResultsA total of 350 burns cases were analyzed. A 36% reduction in the number of emergency department visits was identified during Period 1. However, we found an increase in the rate of hospital admissions in Period 1 (20% of the burn cases) compared with Period 2 (13% of the burn cases). Seventy-six burn-related primary admissions were analyzed: 37 patients were admitted during Period 1 and 39 patients during Period 2. No differences were found between the two periods in the proportion of patients that underwent surgical treatment: 59.5% of patients admitted during Period 1 and 61.5% of patients admitted during Period 2. A statistically significant increase was noted in the rate of paediatric (aged 0–16 years old) admissions during Period 1 (40.54%, n = 15) compared to Period 2 (20.5%, n = 8). Among paediatric patients, an increase in the rate of surgical procedures was noted in Period 1 (47% of children), compared with Period 2 (37% of children). Proportion of patients that were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit was higher among burn children admitted during period 1 (46.7%, n = 7) than those admitted during Period 2 (25%, n = 2). Among the 37 patients admitted during the lockdown period, two positive COVID-19 patients were confirmed.ConclusionsThis study gives an overview of the clinical and epidemiologic profile of burned patients during the stringent lockdown in Spain forced by the COVID-19 epidemic. Our data shows a stable trend in the number of burn-related admissions and burn related-surgeries during the confinement period. A significant increase in the rate of burn children admitted and an increase in the severity of injuries in this population is noted. These data must be taken in account in the development of strategies to ensure the maintenance of Burn Centers function in extremely situations such as the current epidemic. A lack of effective burn prevention campaigns in our environment has been noted and the development of focused prevention strategies is a priority.     

Exploratory analysis of long-term physical and mental health morbidity and mortality: A comparison of individuals with self-inflicted versus non-self-inflicted burn injuries

IntroductionSelf-inflicted burn (SIB) injuries are relatively rare, but patients may experience complex biopsychosocial challenges. This study aimed to compare long-term physical and psychological outcomes for individuals with SIB and non-SIB injuries.MethodsRecords of adult SIB (n = 125) and non-SIB (n = 3604) injuries were collected from U.S. burn centers within the Burn Model System between 1993 and 2018. Assessments were administered at discharge, 6 months, 24 months, 5 years, and 10 years.ResultsSIB patients were more often younger, unmarried, unemployed, male, struggling with pre-morbid psychiatric issues, and injured by fire/flame (all p < 0.001). SIB injury predicted prolonged mechanical ventilation, hospitalization, and rehabilitation (all p < 0.001). After injury, SIB patients had increased anxiety at 24 months (p = 0.0294), increased suicidal ideation at 5 years (p = 0.004), and clinically worse depression at 10 years (p = 0.0695). SIB patients had increased mortality across 24 months compared to non-SIB patients (OR = 4.706, p = 0.010).ConclusionSIB injuries are associated with worse physical and psychological outcomes compared to non-SIB injuries including complicated hospitalizations and chronic problems with anxiety, depression, suicidality, and mortality, even when controlling for common indicators of severity such as burn size. This underscores the importance of multidisciplinary treatment, including mental healthcare, and long-term follow-up for SIB patients. Identified pre-morbid risk factors indicate the need for targeted injury prevention.     

Sparsity of burn centers and prolonged length of hospital stay: A nationwide study

IntroductionThe optimal distribution of burn centers remains unclear. We aimed to determine the appropriate number of burn centers per population (density) and examined a nationwide registry with the hypothesis that low-density burn centers would be associated with unfavorable outcomes.Patients and methodsA retrospective study was conducted using the Japanese Society of Burn Injury registry (2011–2021). Burn center density was defined as the number of burn centers per one million population in each prefecture, and centers were trisected on the basis of density. Hospital-free days until day 30 were compared between patients at high-, middle-, and low-density centers. Inverse probability weighting was conducted to adjust baseline characteristics, including age, burn mechanism, and burn severity.ResultsWe included 6764, 6209, and 2200 patients at high-, middle-, and low-density burn centers, respectively. After adjusting for patient demographics and burn severity, patients at high- and middle-density centers (≥0.4 centers per one million population) had longer hospital-free days compared with those at low-density centers (11 [0–23] vs 11 [0–23] vs 8 [0–22] days; p < 0.001).ConclusionsLow burn center density (<0.4 centers per one million population) was associated with longer hospital stay, whereas no higher limit was determined.