Clinical outcomes of nedaplatin and S-1 treatment with concurrent radiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer

Conclusion: Nedaplatin and S-1 treatment with concurrent radiotherapy was effective, with acceptable toxicities. This regimen does not require extensive intravenous hydration and continuous infusion. Nedaplatin and S-1 may contribute to better clinical outcomes and improve quality of life for patients. Objectives: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin and S-1 for head and neck squamous cell cancer. Methods: Forty-six patients with oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and laryngeal cancer were treated with S-1 on days 1 through 14 and nedaplatin on day 1 every 4 weeks for two cycles of radiotherapy. Therapeutic responses and adverse events were assessed. Results: Primary site tumors and neck lymph nodes exhibited complete response rates of 91% and 64.3%, respectively. The 4-year relapse-free survival and overall survival rates were 76.2% and 85.3%, respectively. The main grade 3 and 4 toxicities were mucositis (30%), leukopenia (30%), anorexia (22%), dermatitis (15%), and thrombocytopenia (9%).     

Survival Benefits From Surgery for Stage IVa Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis of 1,033 Cases

ObjectivesHead and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCs) are frequently diagnosed at the locoregional advanced stage (stage IVa), but controversy remains regarding whether stage IVa HSNCs should be treated with upfront surgery or definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT). The purpose of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage IVa HNSC treated primarily by surgery with curative intent with/without (neo)adjuvant treatment (surgery group) versus those treated primarily with CRT (CRT group).MethodsWe reviewed data of 1,033 patients with stage IVa HNSC treated with curative intent at 17 cancer centers between 2010 and 2016.ResultsAmong 1,033 patients, 765 (74.1%) received upfront surgery and 268 (25.9%) received CRT. The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 64.4% and 62.0% in the surgery group and 49.5% and 45.4% in the CRT group, respectively. In multivariate analyses, OS and DFS were better in the surgery group than in the CRT group (odds ratio [OR] for death, 0.762; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.592–0.981; OR for recurrence, 0.628; 95% CI, 0.492–0.802). In subgroup analyses, the OS and DFS of patients with oropharyngeal cancer were better in the surgery group (OR for death, 0.548; 95% CI, 0.341–0.879; OR for recurrence, 0.598; 95% CI, 0.377–0.948). In the surgery group, patients with laryngeal cancer showed better OS (OR for death, 0.432; 95% CI, 0.211–0.882), while those with hypopharyngeal cancer DFS was improved (OR for recurrence, 0.506; 95% CI, 0.328–0.780).ConclusionA survival benefit from surgery may be achieved even in patients with stage IVa HNSC, particularly those with oropharyngeal and laryngeal cancer. Surgery led to a reduction in the recurrence rate in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer.     

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a comprehensive treatment in patients with laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is important for advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma (LHC).

Aims/objectives: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of docetaxel, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in induction treatment of advanced LHC.

Material and methods: A total of 157 cancer patients were included. The primary endpoints of this study were overall response rate, pathological complete response rate, the safety of induction treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: After two-cycle induction treatment, 17(10.8%) patients experienced complete remission, 76 (48.4%) experienced partial remission, 47 (30.0%) had stable disease, and 17 (10.8%) had progressive disease. The TNM stage decreased by two or more in 17 cases, decreased by one in 71 cases, increased in 15 cases, and did not change in 54 cases after induction treatment. Most of the adverse chemotherapy responses were alleviated by symptomatic management. After the induction treatment, 29 patients continued receiving chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy, and 112 underwent surgical management depending on tumor site followed by radiotherapy. The median PFS was 13.00?±?2.10 months and the median OS was 14.20?±?0.29 months.

Conclusions and significance: Combination of docetaxel, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil plays an important role in the comprehensive treatment of advanced LHC.     

Long-term efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin and S-1 for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

ObjectiveThe present study aimed to retrospectively analyze the long-term efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin and S-1 for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.MethodsThe study enrolled 53 patients (23 with stage II disease, 13 with stage III disease, and 17 with stage IV disease). S-1 was administered orally twice a day for 14 days, followed by a two-week rest period. Nedaplatin was intravenously administered on day 4. Where possible, two courses of chemotherapy were performed. Radiotherapy was started with the administration of S-1. We analyzed the clinical response, survival rate, acute adverse events, and late swallowing toxicity.ResultsThe complete response rates for the primary tumor and neck lymph node metastases were 94.3% and 79.3%, respectively. The five-year overall survival rate was 79.5%, the five-year disease-specific survival rate was 84.8%, and the five-year relapse-free survival rate was 73.7%. The main acute adverse events were leukopenia, neutropenia, mucositis, and dermatitis. No patient had severe nephrotoxicity. Late swallowing toxicity was observed in 13 patients.ConclusionsThe low toxicity, and low nephrotoxicity of chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin and S-1 have a positive impact on long-term survival. The combination of nedaplatin and S-1 can be used instead of cisplatin and 5-?uorouracil as a safer regimen, especially in patients with some complications and those requiring treatment in an outpatient setting.     

Assessment of Oropharyngeal Cancer

The records of 87 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, treated between 1971 and 1998 at Kitasato University Hospital, were reviewed with the aim of investigating further directions for oropharyngeal cancer treatment. The patients were divided into four major treatment groups: a radiotherapy group; an operation group; a simultaneous chemoradiotherapy group; and a combination treatment group. The 5-year cumulative survival rates for Stages I-IV were 75%, 78%, 68% and 41%, respectively. None of the T4 cases survived for >5 years. The survival rates of patients with anterior and posterior wall cancers were higher than those with lateral and superior wall cancers. All patients in the operation group survived for 5 years. The survival rates for the combination treatment, radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups were 80%, 57% and 52%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative local control rates for T2-T4 tumors were 61%, 58% and 0%, respectively. The combination therapy (80%) and chemoradiotherapy (66%) groups had significantly higher local control rates than the radiation group (33%). The 5-year cumulative regional control rate according to N classification was 80%, except for N2 lymph nodes, for which only 60% of patients were free of regional recurrences. Approximately 15% of patients with oropharyngeal cancer had either distant metastases or double cancer. We conclude from this review that simultaneous chemoradiotherapy is a good initial therapy for Stages T1-T3 oropharyngeal cancer. However, for T4 tumors, further combinations of both chemoradiotherapy and surgery and the development of new anticancer drugs for use in chemoradiotherapy, immunotherapy or gene therapy may be needed.     

Long-term clinical outcomes of supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy for glottic carcinoma

Abstract

Background: Laryngeal carcinoma should be treated with the intent of organ-sparing, and supracricoid partial laryngectomy with cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (CHEP) might be an important option.

Aims/objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of glottic carcinoma patients treated with CHEP.

Materials and methods: A series of 164 cases with glottic carcinoma undergoing CHEP from 2006 to 2010 was retrospectively analyzed.

Results: The 10-year overall survival (OS) rate, disease-specific survival (DSS) rate, and disease-free survival (DFS) rate were 77.6%, 78.8%, 74.1%, respectively. The OS, DSS, and DFS of patients with stage T1 were higher than patients with stages T2 and T3. Patients with locoregional recurrence and distant metastases had lower OS and DFS than patients with neither recurrence nor metastasis. The DFS of patients with advanced laryngeal carcinoma was worse than that of patients with early-stage carcinoma. T2 and T3 stages, locoregional recurrence, and distant metastases had predictive value regarding patient survival. Additionally, the decannulation rate of postoperative patients was 95.1%, and the nasogastric feeding tube removal rate was 100%.

Conclusions and Significance: CHEP provided reliable oncologic and functional outcomes, and it should be considered as a standard function-sparing option for glottic T1b, T2, and selected T3 carcinoma patients.     

Salvage surgery for recurrence of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study from 2005 to 2013

ObjectivesSalvage surgery is the gold-standard treatment for locoregional recurrence of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer following radiation therapy. Imperfect oncologic and functional results, however, require patient selection. The main objective of the present study was to determine preoperative factors for survival. Secondary objectives were to study 5-year overall and disease-free survival, general and locoregional complications, and functional results in terms of feeding and tracheotomy closure.Patients and methodA retrospective multicenter study included 52 patients treated by salvage surgery for recurrence of laryngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma after radiation therapy between 2005 and 2013.ResultsFactors associated with improved 3-year overall survival on univariate analysis comprised laryngeal primary (P = 0.001), laryngeal recurrence (P = 0.026), rT1, rT2 or rT3 rather than rT4 tumor (P = 0.007), previous chemotherapy (P = 0.036), and neck dissection during salvage surgery (P = 0.005), the last of these being confirmed on multivariate analysis. Five-year overall survival was 36.0% (range, 27.6–44.4%), for a median 23.04 months (95% CI, 19.44–26.64). Five-year disease-free survival was 23.5% (range, 16.0–31.0%), for a median 8.04 months (95% CI, 2.04–14.04).ConclusionSalvage surgery for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer is difficult, and survival is not good. Laryngeal primary and recurrence location, moderate tumor volume and extension (< T4), prior chemotherapy and neck dissection during salvage surgery were associated with better overall and disease-free survival, which should enable better patient selection.     

Assessment of oropharyngeal cancer

The records of 87 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, treated between 1971 and 1998 at Kitasato University Hospital, were reviewed with the aim of investigating further directions for oropharyngeal cancer treatment. The patients were divided into four major treatment groups: a radiotherapy group; an operation group; a simultaneous chemoradiotherapy group; and a combination treatment group. The 5-year cumulative survival rates for Stages I-IV were 75%, 78%, 68% and 41%, respectively. None of the T4 cases survived for > 5 years. The survival rates of patients with anterior and posterior wall cancers were higher than those with lateral and superior wall cancers. All patients in the operation group survived for 5 years. The survival rates for the combination treatment, radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups were 80%, 57% and 52%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative local control rates for T2-T4 tumors were 61%, 58% and 0%, respectively. The combination therapy (80%) and chemoradiotherapy (66%) groups had significantly higher local control rates than the radiation group (33%). The 5-year cumulative regional control rate according to N classification was approximately 80%, except for N2 lymph nodes, for which only 60% of patients were free of regional recurrences. Approximately 15% of patients with oropharyngeal cancer had either distant metastases or double cancer. We conclude from this review that simultaneous chemoradiotherapy is a good initial therapy for Stages Tl-T3 oropharyngeal cancer. However, for T4 tumors, further combinations of both chemoradiotherapy and surgery and the development of new anticancer drugs for use in chemoradiotherapy, immunotherapy or gene therapy may be needed.     

The association of smoking and outcomes in HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review

PurposeWhile smoking is linked to worse outcomes for human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC), the magnitude of this association and the amount of smoking exposure necessary to confer clinically significant differences in outcomes is unclear. Recent studies suggested that greater tobacco exposure results in higher risk of cancer progression and death. Our study objective was to perform a systematic review of the association between smoking and HPV-related OPSCC outcomes.Materials and methodsA literature search was conducted in April 2019 to identify relevant articles using Embase, Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Cochrane databases. All studies were independently screened by two investigators to identify studies that assessed HPV-positive patients as an independent cohort, specified smoking measures, and reported locoregional recurrence (LRR), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), or disease-free survival (DFS) in association with smoking.ResultsOf 1130 studies identified, 10 met final inclusion criteria with 2321 total patients, mean age 57.5 years. Smoking measures included ever vs never, current vs never/former smokers, ≤10 vs >10 pack-year, and continuous pack-years. Of these studies, 8 (80%) showed a significant effect of smoking on increasing recurrence and mortality. Adjusted HRs for LRR ranged from 0.6 to 5.2, OS from 1.3 to 4.0, DSS from 2.3 to 7.2, and DFS from 1.02 to 4.2 among heavier smokers compared to lighter/non-smokers.ConclusionsWhile there was significant variability in smoking metrics and reported outcomes, all studies reporting statistically significant HRs showed that smoking was associated with worse outcomes. Further studies using uniform smoking measures are necessary to better understand this association.     

Improved clinical outcomes with multi-modality therapy for sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma of the head and neck

ObjectiveTo examine outcomes among patients treated for sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) of the head and neck.Study designRetrospective review.MethodsThe records of 16 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed, non-metastatic SNUC were analyzed. Initial treatment consisted of: surgery alone (6 patients), surgery with post-operative chemoradiotherapy (4 patients), and primary radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy (6 patients).ResultsThe median survival for patients treated by surgery followed by postoperative chemoradiotherapy was 30 months compared to 7 months and 9 months for patients treated by surgery alone and upfront chemoradiotherapy, respectively (p = 0.20). The 2-year locoregional control was 18% for patients treated with upfront chemoradiotherapy, 37% for patients treated with surgery alone, and 78% for patients treated with surgery plus chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.49).ConclusionWhile the potential role of selection bias must be considered, multi-modality therapy using surgery and post-operative chemoradiotherapy yielded the most favorable outcomes for SNUC and should be recommended whenever feasible.     

Supratracheal laryngectomy: a multi-institutional study

IntroductionSupratracheal laryngectomy has been described as a surgical procedure for glottic or supraglottic cancer extending to the subglottic region and/or involving the cricoarytenoid joint, aiming to preserve laryngeal function (breathing, phonation and swallowing), without diminishing locoregional cancer control. The choice of supracricoid laryngectomy in these cases could result in a high risk of compromised resection margins.ObjectiveTo determine the safety, viability, adequacy of surgical margins and the supratracheal laryngectomy results for intermediate and advanced laryngeal cancer by reviewing the results at three different institutions in Brazil.MethodsThis is a retrospective study that analyzed the charts of 29 patients submitted to supratracheal laryngectomy from October 1997 to June 2017. The type of laryngectomy performed was classified according to the European Laryngological Society classification for horizontal laryngectomies. Early and late results were evaluated. Survival rates (overall, specific, disease-free and total laryngectomy-free survival) were calculated. The mean follow-up time was 44 months.ResultsOf the 29 patients submitted to supratracheal laryngectomy, 25 had no previous treatment. One patient (3.4%) had compromised margins. Four patients (13.8%) had recurrence. Of these, three had local recurrence and one had regional recurrence. Five patients (17.2%) required a total laryngectomy, two due to ruptured pexy and three due to local recurrence. Four of these patients (80%) achieved a successful total procedure. Four patients (13.8%) died, two due to postoperative complications and two due to recurrence. Overall, specific, disease-free and total laryngectomy-free survival at 5 years were, respectively, 82.1%; 88.2%; 83.0% and 80.2%.ConclusionSelected patients with intermediate and advanced laryngeal cancer may benefit from supratracheal laryngectomy, that resulted in total laryngectomy-free survival and specific survival of 80.2% and 88.2%, respectively.     

Planned neck dissection after weekly docetaxel and concurrent radiotherapy for advanced oropharyngeal cancer

Small oropharyngeal carcinomas with advanced neck metastases (stage N2 or greater) are common. Patients with small T with large N oropharyngeal carcinoma have high rates of local control but lower rates of regional control when treated with chemoradiotherapy. Clinical assessment after chemoradiotherapy cannot ensure the absence of neck disease. In the last 5 years, we have treated patients with T1-2 with N2-3 oropharyngeal carcinoma with weekly docetaxel radiotherapy followed by planned neck dissection (PND). Our objectives were to clarify the pathologically complete response (CR) rate of neck metastasis after weekly docetaxel radiotherapy, to identify the clinical predictor of residual neck disease, and to determine the mobidity of planned neck dissection. After chemoradiotherapy, all 12 patients had a complete response at the primary site. We conducted 15 neck dissections. Of these, 6 (40%) had positive nodes. The pathological CR rate of neck metastasis was 58.3%, whereas overall 2-year neck control rate was 91.7%. These findings lend support to the role of PND after chemoradiotherapy in N2-3 neck disease. After chemoradiotherapy, clinical parameters including TN status, feasibility of chemoradiotherapy, largest lymph node size or size reduction in MRI, did not identify patients with residual neck disease. We conducted selective neck dissection (SND) in 80% of patients. SNI) as PND appears to be appropriate in this group of patients because of the low incidence of complications. A further cohort study including the comparison of PND nonenforcement group is necessary to clarify the validity of the addition of PND in weekly docetaxel radiotherapy.     

Postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in older patients with head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND: In head and neck cancer, the locoregional failure of patients with positive margins, vascular or perineural invasion, and extracapsular spread is high and results in poor survival. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in improving treatment outcomes among older patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing radical surgery (median age, 73.5 years [range, 70-78 years]) were enrolled (35 men and 5 women; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, grade 0-2). Disease sites included the oral cavity (10 patients), oropharynx (12 patients), hypopharynx (8 patients), and larynx (10 patients); pathological TNM classifications included T1 N2 (8 patients), T2 N1-2 (12 patients), T3 N0-2 (8 patients), and T4 N0-2 (12 patients), with the following poor prognostic factors: positive margins (6 patients), vascular invasion (14 patients), neural invasion (16 patients), and extracapsular spread (26 patients). All patients were treated with carboplatin (30 mg/m2 on days 1-5 of weeks 1, 3, and 5) concomitant with radiotherapy (54.0 Gy to all risk volumes plus 10.0 Gy to high-risk volumes; 5 daily fractions of 1.8 Gy each per week). RESULTS: No grade 4 toxicity was observed. Grade 3 toxicity included mucositis (10 patients), neutropenia (6 patients), dermatitis (2 patients), and thrombocytopenia (1 patient). The radiotherapy dose administered was 52.0 Gy to all risk volumes plus 10.0 Gy to high-risk volumes. Thirty-two patients (80%) received 3 cycles, 6 (15%) received 2 cycles, and 2 (5%) received 1 cycle. Three-year survival was as follows: disease-free survival, 58%; overall survival, 64%; and local control, 79%. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may be successful in fit older patients. The results of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were better than those observed in a comparable group treated with radiotherapy alone and were similar to those observed in a younger group with the same poor prognostic factors treated with adjuvant carboplatin plus radiotherapy.     

Useful combination of intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiation therapy for lateral oropharyngeal wall cancer

Conclusion: A concomitant treatment of intra-arterial chemotherapy and radiation therapy is a promising therapeutic option for oropharyngeal cancers. Objectives: Treatment for oropharyngeal cancer has been far from standardized because of its pathophysiologic complexity and its low incidence. In our department, T1 stage tumors with N0 or N1 status are primarily treated surgically, while T1 tumors with N2 or more advanced lymph node involvement are additionally treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Treatment for T2, T3, and T4 tumors is based on CRT, but surgery is also performed if necessary. Patients and methods: The study included 73 patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the lateral oropharyngeal wall who received first-line therapy at our department between May 1993 and October 2003. Results: The 5-year disease-specific survival by disease stage was 100% for stage I, 90.9% for stage II, 88.2% for stage III, 69.8% for stage Iva, and 22.2% for stage IVb. The overall 5-year disease-specific survival was 71.8%, and the overall 5-year crude survival was 54.1%.     

A phase II study of docetaxel and carboplatin with concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer

Objective

In this study we evaluate the clinical response and safety profile of a regimen of docetaxel + carboplatin concurrent with radiotherapy (RT) in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (HNSCC).

Methods

Between January 2006 and December 2008, we enrolled 38 patients (stage IVA: 29 patients; stage III: 9 patients). Fourteen had oral cavity cancer (tongue 10, buccal mucosa 2, alveolar ridge 1, floor of mouth 1), 10 had oropharyngeal cancer (base of tongue 5, tonsil 5), 13 had laryngeal cancer, and 1 had maxillary sinus cancer. Patients received concurrent docetaxel 15 mg/m² 1-h infusion plus carboplatin AUC of 2, 30-min infusion on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36. RT began on day 1 of concurrent chemotherapy with 2 cGy/fraction, 5 fractions/week (total dose: 66-70 cGy). Tumor was assessed by CT scan 3 months post-completion of concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Results

Thirty-five patients were evaluated (2 refused to receive all treatments, 1 had serious adverse event [rash, wheezing] from docetaxel first dose). The primary study endpoint of clinical response was achieved in 26 (74.3%) patients, 6 (17.1%) had stable disease, and 3 (8.6%) had disease progression. The 2-year disease-free survival was 62.9% (CI: 45.85-79.95%). The 2-year overall survival was 64.1% (CI: 43.52-84.68%). The most common Grade 3 toxicities were mucositis, xerostomia and dysphagia (13.9% each) and dermatitis (11%). No Grade 4 toxicities were observed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study with a limited number of patients, docetaxel + carboplatin concurrent with RT appears to show acceptable activity and is generally well tolerated in patients with locally advanced HNSCC.     

Pathological evaluation of radiotherapy and concomitant intraarterial cisplatin for maxillary sinus cancer

ObjectiveSince 2010, we have mainly performed surgical treatment following radiotherapy and concomitant intraarterial cisplatin (RADPLAT) for locally advanced maxillary sinus cancer (MSC). The present study investigated treatment results and pathological evaluations following RADPLAT for MSC.MethodsPathological response to RADPLAT was evaluated using surgical specimens. Pathological response was graded in accordance with the classification method that Shimosato reported in 1964, as grade V (no tumor cells remain in any of section), grade IV, III, II, I, and 0. Five-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Univariate analyses of correlations between recurrence of MSC and other clinicopathological parameters were evaluated using the chi-square or Fisher's exact tests.Result19 patients were enrolled in this study, 5 patients showed T3 disease and 14 had T4 disease. One patient demonstrated local recurrence and 3 patients experienced distant metastasis. The 5-year overall survival rate was 67.1% (T3, 50.0%; T4, 69.6%), and the 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 81.9% (T3, 100%; T4, 76.0%). Histological response was categorized as grade V in 9 cases. No significant risk factors for residual cancer were identified.ConclusionOur study suggested that RADPLAT not only has a low risk of side effects, but also could represent an effective procedure for locally advanced MSC by pathological evaluation. Increasing the therapeutic intensity of RADPLAT might provide an effective modality to avoid highly invasive surgery.     

Complete pathologic response as a prognostic factor for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx post-chemoradiotherapy

IntroductionChemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (SCCO) provides good results for locoregional disease control, with high rates of complete clinical and pathologic responses, mainly in the neck.ObjectiveTo determine whether complete pathologic response after chemoradiotherapy is related to the prognosis of patients with SCCO.MethodsData were prospectively extracted from clinical records of N2 and N3 SCCO patients submitted to a planned neck dissection after chemoradiotherapy.ResultsA total of 19 patients were evaluated. Half of patients obtained complete pathologic response in the neck. Distant or locoregional recurrence occurred in approximately 42% of patients, and 26% died. Statistical analysis showed an association between complete pathologic response and lower disease recurrence rate (77.8% vs. 20.8%; p = 0.017) and greater overall survival (88.9% vs. 23.3%; p = 0.049).ConclusionThe presence of a complete pathologic response after chemoradiotherapy positively influences the prognosis of patients with SCCO.     

Results of preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced cancer of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses

Objectives: Curative treatment of nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer is challenging due to the proximity to critical anatomical structures. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of trimodality therapy with preoperative chemotherapy and reduced-dose radiotherapy followed by organ-preserving surgery for treating patients with nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.

Methods: This retrospective study included all 156 patients diagnosed with sinonasal cancer in western Sweden between 1986 and 2009. We determined the treatment selection pattern and treatment outcomes for 79 patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Results: Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histology. The five-year overall survival was 54%, and 85% of these patients had T3 or T4 tumors. The five-year cumulative incidence rate of local recurrence was 32%. The five-year overall survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma was 45% and 76%, respectively. The median preoperative radiation dose was 48?Gy. Orbital exenteration was performed in 7% of patients.

Conclusions: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy may be beneficial for patients with advanced sinonasal cancer when primary radical surgery is challenging. Survival outcomes were comparable to outcomes reported in the literature despite conservative surgery and relatively low radiation doses in patients with locally advanced tumors.     

Facility volume and survival: Human papilloma virus positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundTo analyze the impact of facility volume on survival for human papilloma virus positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+ OPSCC) patients.MethodsPatients treated for HPV+ OPSCC from 2010 to 2017 were queried from the National Cancer Database. Facilities of average annual case volume <50th percentile were categorized as low-volume (LV) and >95th percentile as high-volume (HV).Results11,546 were included, with 10,305 patients (89.3 %) treated at LV and 1241 (10.7 %) at HV facilities. A greater proportion of cases involving resection of base of tongue and lingual tonsil were treated at HV (30.3 %) compared to LV (22.3 %) facilities (p < 0.001). Patients treated at a HV facility had greater percentage of clinical T4 (11.2 % vs. 8.6 %, p = 0.001) and N+ disease (90.5 % vs. 85.7 %, p < 0.001) patients. Survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference between five-year overall survival rates by facility volume (p = 0.388) for all patients. On multivariable analysis, facility volume was not associated with survival (HR: 0.968 [0.758–1.235], p = 0.791). These trends were found for both patients undergoing primary surgery or chemoradiotherapy.ConclusionOur data indicates that patients with HPV+ OPSCC do not experience a survival benefit with treatment at HV facility, suggesting these patients may be adequately treated at LV centers.     

Predictors of prolongation in radiation treatment time in a veteran population treated with chemoradiation for oropharyngeal cancer

Background: Prolonged radiation treatment time (RTT) is associated with worse tumor control. Here we identify and determine the implications of factors that predict treatment prolongation in Veterans Affairs (VA) patients undergoing chemoradiation.

Methods: Chart review from July 2000 to October 2013. 81 patients with advanced stage oropharyngeal cancer treated with chemoradiation.

Results: Twenty-nine patients (35.8%) had RTT prolonged by ≥10 days. Prolongation mainly resulted from acute treatment toxicity (n?=?22, 76%). There was no significant difference in RTT for patients treated with concurrent cisplatin versus cetuximab, or in patients treated with or without induction chemotherapy. One-/three-year locoregional control and overall survival rates of 83.4%/76.3% and 83.5%/63.6% for patients without prolonged RTT versus 61.8%/61.8% and 82.8%/73.8% for those with prolongation (p?>.05).

Conclusions: Prolonged RTT is a significant predictor of worse locoregional control and predominantly resulted from treatment side effects. More aggressive regimens with induction and concurrent chemotherapy did not predispose to prolonged RTT.