Is elective neck dissection necessary for the surgical management of T2N0 glottic carcinoma?

Objective

Evaluation of neck metastasis incidence in surgically treated T2N0M0 glottic carcinoma patients and discussion the necessity of elective neck dissection in this subset of larynx carcinomas.

Materials and methods

The patients who were staged clinically and radiologically as T2N0M0 glottic carcinoma having surgical intervention for their primary tumor and elective neck dissection between March 1996 and July 2009 with at least 2 years of follow up were included in the study. The recordings of patients were evaluated retrospectively for primary tumor location, vocal cord mobility, type of laryngectomy and neck dissection, results of histopathological examination, number of dissected lymph nodes for each specimen and for local and regional failure during the follow up.

Results

In the 13-year study period, 24 consecutive patients with a mean age of 56.4 were treated surgically with 20 frontolateral, three vertical laryngectomies and one cricohyoido-epiglottopexy; 19 lateral and 5 functional neck dissections were performed for the necks. Histopathological examinations of the neck dissection specimens revealed an average of 32 lymph nodes (8–65) and there was no metastasis in any of these specimens. After an average 58 months of follow-up, only one patient had local failure and no patients had regional failure.

Conclusion

As occult metastasis was not detected in any of the neck dissection specimens in cT2N0M0 patients and no regional failure was experienced during the follow-up period, it was concluded that the neck could be followed up without performing elective neck dissection in the surgical management of cT2N0M0 glottic carcinoma patients.     

Does unnecessary elective neck treatment affect the prognosis of N0 laryngeal cancer patients?

OBJECTIVE: Among detractors of elective neck (N0) treatments, most suggest that lymphadenectomy removes a barrier to the spread of disease with deleterious immunologic consequences. To test this hypothesis we performed a retrospective comparison of the survival results of N0 laryngeal cancer patients who received unnecessary elective neck treatments (N0-) and those of N0 patients subjected to close and regular follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 749 N0 laryngeal cancer patients treated at the Institute of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florence between January 1980 and January 1993 was performed. Of these, 245 (33%) received elective neck dissection (ED), while the remaining 504 (67%) N0 patients were subjected to close and regular follow-up (wait-and-see policy; WS). RESULTS: Of the 245 ED patients, 43 (17.5%) showed an occult neck disease, while of the 504 WS subjects, 83 (17%) developed neck metastases during follow-up. Moreover, 15 ED patients subsequently experienced a contralateral occult failure despite a unilateral negative neck specimen (N0-). Thus, ultimately 187 ED (164 of whom were treated unilaterally and 23 bilaterally) and 421 WS patients were used for survival analysis. No differences in terms of postoperative complications, local or distant failure or disease-free or overall actuarial survival were found between the two groups analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that unilateral or bilateral removal of cervical lymphatics in the absence of histologically proven lymph node metastases does not negatively affect the prognosis of N0 laryngeal cancer patients who were overtreated to the neck.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy or elective neck dissection for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma?

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) seems to be a promising method for staging clinically N0 neck in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). In the present study, SNB was performed on 46 patients having elective neck dissection (END; six bilateral dissections) for T1–T3N0 OSCC. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) were first examined according to only slightly modified standard histopathologic protocol including sections at 1–2 mm intervals and H&E staining. SLN that appeared false negative (i.e. metastatic non-SLN without metastasis in a SLN) after the initial histopathologic examination were further assessed by step sectioning at 150 μm intervals and immunohistochemistry. Of the 47 neck sides with at least one SLN identified, nine contained metastasis in nine patients. After the initial histopathologic examination, SLNs were negative for malignant cells in four out of the nine metastatic neck sides. In one neck side, two metastatic SLNs were detected after the additional meticulous histopathologic work-up of the initially false negative SLNs. Therefore, in three neck sides the SLN did not contain metastasis although there was a metastasis in a non-SLN. In all these three cases with a false negative SLN, only one SLN had been identified. The sensitivity of the method (employing extensive histopathologic work-up) for detection of occult cervical metastasis was 67% (6/9 neck sides). The sensitivity of SNB for detection of occult metastasis seems to be poor in cases where only one SLN can be identified. The results of this study do not entitle us to entirely replace END by SNB in patients with OSCC.     

Is extended selective supraomohyoid neck dissection indicated for treatment of oral cancer with clinically negative neck?

Oral cavity tumors may develop occult metastases to the cervical lymph nodes. Current imaging techniques and routine histopathologic methods may fail to detect lymph node micrometastases, but the surgeon has to electively dissect a neck at risk of developing clinical disease. Supraomohyoid neck dissection has been the elective surgery for treating a clinically negative neck in patients with oral cavity primaries. A literature review revealed that level IV nodes can be significantly affected by occult disease with and without metastases in level I-III lymph nodes. This means that level IV nodes have to be included in the supraomohyoid neck dissection, resulting in a more extensive surgical procedure to ensure a margin of oncological safety.     

Is elective neck dissection indicated during salvage surgery for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?

Among patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with a negative neck who are initially treated with (chemo)radiotherapy, a number of cases will recur locally without obvious neck recurrence. There is little information available as to the most efficacious management of the neck in these cases. We have reviewed the literature to see what conclusions can be drawn from previous reports. We conducted a bibliography search on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Studies published in the English language and those on squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, nasopharynx, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx were included. Data related to neck management were extracted from the articles. Twelve studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Five studies reported only one treatment plan (either neck dissection or observation), while the others compared neck dissection to observation. The rate of occult metastases ranged from 3.4 to 12 %. The studies included a variable distribution of primary sites and stages of the recurrent primary tumors. The risk of occult neck node metastasis in a clinically rN0 patient correlated with tumor site and T stage. Observation of the neck can be suggested for patients with T1-2 glottic tumors, who recurred with less advanced tumors (rT1-2). For patients with more advanced laryngeal recurrences or recurrence at other high-risk sites, neck dissection could be considered for the rN0 patient, particularly if the neck was not included in the previous radiation fields.     

Is voice rehabilitation not necessary for patients with laryngeal cancer after radiotherapy?

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology -     

Is dissection of levels 4 and 5 justified for cN0 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer?

CONCLUSION: Dissecting levels 2 and 3 and sparing the dissection of level 4 and the contralateral neck when frozen section results are negative are reasonable options for the selective dissection of cN0 necks. Our findings show that dissection of level 5 is considered unnecessary, unless there is overt metastasis. OBJECTIVE: The level of node involvement and recurrence rates were assessed in cN0 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma patients in order to develop appropriate guidelines for the treatment of the neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 328 cN0 necks operated with selective dissection were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were monitored for at least 24 months and regional recurrences were evaluated. RESULTS: The prevalence of level 4 occult metastases was 3.4%; 1.5% of them were isolated to level 4. We observed regional recurrence in 5.6% of the necks. No case of metastasis or regional relapse was observed in level 5.     

Is dissection of levels 4 and 5 justified for cN0 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer?

Conclusion. Dissecting levels 2 and 3 and sparing the dissection of level 4 and the contralateral neck when frozen section results are negative are reasonable options for the selective dissection of cN0necks. Our findings show that dissection of level 5 is considered unnecessary, unless there is overt metastasis. Objective. The level of node involvement and recurrence rates were assessed in cN0 laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma patients in order to develop appropriate guidelines for the treatment of the neck. Materials and methods. A total of 328 cN0necks operated with selective dissection were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were monitored for at least 24months and regional recurrences were evaluated. Results. The prevalence of level 4occult metastases was 3.4%; 1.5% of them were isolated to level 4. We observed regional recurrence in 5.6% of the necks. No case of metastasis or regional relapse was observed in level 5.     

Para-tracheal neck dissection - is dissection of the upper part of level Ⅵ necessary?

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) has a high propensity for regional metastases, however, the impact of such metastases on the outcome of the patients is minimal. The central compartment of the neck is considered the first and the most common echelon of metastases from thyroid carcinoma. Physical examination along with ultrasonography are the gold standard pre-operative evaluation of patients with PTC. Ultrasonography is highly sensitive in evaluating lateral neck nodes, however, its value in evaluating the central compartment is limited, resulting in a relatively high rate of occult metastases in this compartment. The main potential complications of para-tracheal neck dissection (PTND) are recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis and hypocalcemia and these may be higher in patients undergoing PTND compared to thyroidectomy alone. New histological data is available showing no evidence of lymph nodes in the central compartment above a level parallel to the inferior border of the cricoid cartilage. These findings support withholding dissection of the upper para-tracheal region routinely as a part of PTND in patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer. By doing that, the complications may be lower and identical to thyroidectomy alone, thus may abolish arguments against more common use of elective PTND in patients with thyroid carcinoma.     

Selective lateral neck dissection for laryngeal cancer with limited metastatic disease: is it indicated?

The most important prognostic factor in cancer of the larynx is the presence of cervical metastatic disease, which is the most common type of recurrence in such patients. Because micrometastases cannot be detected pre-operatively at present, selective lateral neck dissection is increasingly recommended as the standard treatment for patients with a clinically negative neck in order to reduce the recurrence rate. In cases of N+ disease, selective lateral neck dissection can be as valid as modified radical neck dissection, providing patients have only limited, occult metastatic disease.