Multicenter Experiences with a Single Lead Electrode for Dual Chamber ICD Systems

Monitoring of atrial signals improves the accuracy in identifying supraventricular tachyarrhythmias to prevent inappropriate therapies in patients with implantable ICDs. Since difficulties due to the additional atrial lead were found in dual chamber ICD systems with two leads, the authors designed a single pass VDD lead for use with dual chamber ICDs. After a successful animal study, the prototype VDD lead (single coil defibrillation lead with two additional fractally coated rings for bipolar sensing in the atrium) was temporarily used in 30 patients during a German multicenter study. Atrial and ventricular signals were recorded during sinus rhythm (SR), atrial flutter, AF, and VT or VF. The implantation of the lead was successful in 27 of 30 patients. Mean atrial pacing threshold was 2.5 +/- 0.9 V/0.5 ms, mean atrial impedance was 213 +/- 31 ohms. Atrial amplitudes were greater during SR (2.7 +/- 1.6 mV) than during atrial flutter (1.46 +/- 0.3 mV, P < 0.05) or AF (0.93 +/- 0.37 mV, P < 0.01). During VF atrial "sinus" signals had significantly (P < 0.01) lower amplitudes (1.4 +/- 0.52 mV) than during SR. The mean ventricular sensing was 13.3 +/- 7.9 mV and mean ventricular impedance was 577 +/- 64 ohms. Defibrillation was successful with a 20-J shock in all patients. In addition, 99.6% of P waves could be detected in SR and 84.4% of flutter waves during atrial flutter. During AF, 56.6% of atrial signals could be detected without modification of the signal amplifier. In conclusion, a new designed VDD dual chamber lead provides stable detection of atrial and ventricular signals during SR and atrial flutter. Reliable detection of atrial signals is possible without modification of the ICD amplifier.     

Discrimination between ventricular and supraventricular tachycardia by dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators: importance of the atrial sensing function

Although the addition of atrial sensing in dual chamber ICDs may improve the ability of the device to discriminate between supraventricular (SVT) and ventricular tachycardia (VT), atrial sensing errors may also negatively affect tachycardia classification. This prospective study evaluated the incidence of atrial sensing errors in a dual chamber ICD and their impact on VT/SVT discrimination. In 145 patients, a dual chamber ICD (Defender) was implanted. Analysis of 1,241 tachycardia episodes stored during a mean follow-up of 14+/-8 months revealed atrial sensing errors in 817 (66%) episodes. Upon expert review, device-based classification was confirmed in 509 (98%) of 522 SVT episodes. No false device-based SVT classification was related to atrial sensing errors. Of 719 episodes classified as VT by the device, 645 (90%) were confirmed. There were 74 episodes of false-positive VT detection. Of these, 63 were related to atrial sensing errors: atrial undersensing in 58 (92%) and atrial oversensing in 5 (8%) episodes. Atrial sensing errors led to incorrect VT/SVT discrimination in 51 (4%) of 1,241 episodes. Only the occurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and abdominal site of device implantation showed a significant influence on false VT/SVT discrimination. Atrial sensing errors are frequently encountered in dual chamber ICDs. Due to the VT/SVT discrimination algorithm, atrial sensing errors only led to misclassification in 4 % of all episodes, mainly due to atrial undersensing. No VT underdetection due to atrial oversensing occurred.     

Clinical Evaluation of a Prototype Passive Fixation Dual Chamber Single Pass Lead For Dual Chamber ICD Systems

Dual chamber ICD systems use two separate leads for sensing. We developed and tested a new prototype of a single pass dual chamber passive fixation lead for dual chamber ICDs. Methods and Results: The prototype was a modification of the Guidant CPI Endotak DSP lead. The additional sensing electrode for the right atrium consisted of a side-mounted porous atrial ring electrode (AR). Atrial signals were recorded from the lead in patients during normal sinus rhythm (NSR), atrial fibrillation (AFib), and/or atrial flutter (AFl) with the AR in stable contact with the atrial wall or floating. During NSR, with the AR in contact with the atrial wall, an average P wave amplitude of 7.2 ± 1.5 mV (mean ± SD, n = 12) was measured. After induction of AFib/AFl, the single amplitude decreased to 3.6 ± 1.5 mV (n = 8) during AFib and 3.4 ± 1.7 mV (n = 9) during AFl. Amplitudes dropped between 53% and 75% when the AR lost atrial wall contact. The atrial pacing threshold was 1.0 ± 0.4 V (n = 16) when the AR was in contact with the atrial wall. Conclusions: In future dual chamber ICDs the signals from a passive fixation single pass lead could be used for atrial sensing and pacing as long as the sensing electrode for the right atrium remains in contact with the atrial wall. This system might lead to a simpler, less invasive implantation of dual chamber ICD systems.     

New ICD-Technologies: First Clinical Experience with Dual-Chamber Sensing for Differentiation of Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias

Inappropriate ICD therapy for supraventricular arrhythmias remains an unsolved problem and may lead to serious clinical situations. Current algorithms for differentiation of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias are based on ventricular sensing solely and, therefore, lack semitivity and specificity. This preliminary analysis from a multicenter trial comprises data from the first 26 patients who received a Res-Q? Micron active-can ICD (Stdzer Intermedics) with a ventricular defibrillation lead and an additional bipolar lead for atrial sensing. Digitized atrial and ventricular waveform storage as well as interval charts from 102 induced and 30 spontaneous arrhythmia episodes were prospectively collected and analyzed with regard to appropriateness of ICD therapy. From all 132 arrhythmia episodes, high-quality stored dual-chamber intracardiac electrograms (JFXJM) could be retrieved for further analysis: in 40 (30%) episodes, atrial fibrillation (AF with rapid ventricular response 22, AF with VT9, AF with VF 9) was identified as the underlying intrinsic rhythm, and inappropriate ICD therapy was delivered in 4/22 (18%) episodes of AF with rapid ventricular response. In the remaining 92 (70%) episodes, sinus rhythm was the underlying atrial rhythm (SR with VT 13, SR with VF 79), and no inappropriate therapy was observed. Three of 22 (15%) high-energy shocks delivered for ventricular arrhythmias (VT 9, VF 9, rapid AF 4) terminated AF at the same time. In total, there were 3 complications (2 atrial lead dislodgments, I revision for bleeding). Both atrial lead dislodgments occurred in the 2 patients with passive-fixation leads compared to none in the 24 patients with active-fixation leads (p - 0.003). In conclusion, dual-chamber sensing and waveform storage of the new Res-Q? Micron offer very helpful diagnostic tools for the detection of inappropriate ICD-therapy. Placement of an additional atrial lead is safe and does not interfere with proper ICD function. However, for avoidance of atrial lead dislodgment, active fixation leads are recommended With the tested active-can lead configuration, the efficacy of successful atrial cardioversion by high-energy shocks delivered for ventricular arrhythmias seems to be low.     

Inappropriate detection of supraventricular arrhythmias by implantable dual chamber defibrillators: a comparison of four different algorithms

Inappropriate therapy of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias by an ICD is still a common problem. Dual chamber (DDD) ICDs provide additional atrial sensing and should result in higher specificity for detection of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, a direct comparison of different dual chamber algorithms has not been reported. The detection algorithms of four different DDD ICDs were tested: Phylax AV, Defender IV, Ventak AV III DR, and Gem DR 7271. Based on arrhythmias recorded from patients undergoing invasive electrophysiological studies and in many cases of catheter ablation at our institution, a library consisting of 71 supraventricular and 15 ventricular tachyarrhythmias was created. The library consists of episodes of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter with different AV conduction, typical and atypical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, AV reentrant tachycardia, sinus tachycardia, and ventricular tachycardia with and without ventriculoatrial conduction. Atrial fibrillation was appropriately classified by all four algorithms. However, the specificity for detection of other supraventricular tachyarrhythmias achieved by the Biotronik (12%) and the Guidant (11%) devices was significantly lower compared to the specificity of the ELA (28%) and the Medtronic DDD ICD (20%). This is due to the fact that the Biotronik and the Guidant algorithm classified all supraventricular tachyarrhythmias resulting in a stable ventricular rate as ventricular tachycardia, whereas the ELA and Medtronic algorithms performed a more detailed analysis by assessment of PR association, atrial onset, or timing of the atrial event relative to the ventricular event, respectively. Atrial fibrillation, the most common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in patients with ICD, was detected by all devices.     

Enhanced specificity of a dual chamber ICD arrhythmia detection algorithm by rate stability criteria

Inappropriate therapy remains an important limitation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). PARAD+ was developed to increase the specificity conferred by the original PARAD detection algorithm in the detection of atrial fibrillation (AF). To compare the performances of the two different algorithms, we retrospectively analyzed all spontaneous and sustained episodes of AF and ventricular tachycardia (VT) documented by state-of-the-art ICDs programmed with PARAD or PARAD+ at the physicians' discretion. The results were stratified according to tachycardia rates <150 versus > or =150 beats/min. The study included 329 men and 48 women (64 +/- 10 years of age). PARAD was programmed in 263, and PARAD+ in 84 devices. During a mean follow-up of 11 +/- 3 months, 1,019 VT and 315 AF episodes were documented among 338 devices. For tachycardias with ventricular rates <150 beats/min, the sensitivity of PARAD versus PARAD+ was 96% versus 99% (NS), specificity 80% versus 93% (P < 0.002), positive predictive value (PPV) 94% versus 91% (NS), and negative predictive value (NPV) 86% versus 99% (P < 0.0001). In contrast, in the fast VT zone, the specificity and PPV of PARAD (95% versus 84% and 100% versus 96%) were higher than those of PARAD+ (NS, P < 0.001). Among 23 AF episodes treated in 16 patients, 3 episodes triggered an inappropriate shock in 3 patients, all in the PARAD population. PARAD+ significantly increased the ICD algorithm diagnostic specificity and NPV for AF in the slow VT zone without compromising patient safety.     

Upgrade of permanent pacemakers and single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators to pectoral dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators: indications,surgical approach,and long-term clinical results

The aim of this study was to describe the indications for upgrade of pacemakers (PMs) or single chamber (VVIR) ICDs to dual chamber (DDDR) ICDs, surgical approach, hardware hybridization, and clinical outcome. Patients with preexisting PMs or VVIR ICDs may develop indications for ICD therapy or dual chamber pacing, respectively, that can be served by DDDR ICDs that incorporate preexisting transvenous leads. Fifty-seven patients underwent upgrade from PMs (29/57) or VVIR ICDs (28/57) to pectoral DDDR ICDs. Preexisting transvenous atrial and/or ventricular leads suitable for continued use were incorporated into new DDDR ICDs in 88.5% and 100% of PM and VVIR ICD upgrades, respectively. Acceptable DFTs were achieved in 56 (98.2%) of 57 patients. Appropriate VT/VF therapies were registered among 33.3% of patients during follow-up. No shocks due to lead noise were observed in any patient with hybridized transvenous leads. Atrial far-field R wave (FFRW) oversensing occurred in 24% of DDDR ICD systems incorporating a preexisting atrial lead. FFRW was overcome by programming reduced atrial sensitivity without interfering with the normal ICD system performance in all instances. Upgrade of PMs and VVIR ICDs to pectoral DDDR ICDs is safe and technically feasible in most patients. Preexisting transvenous leads can be successfully incorporated into new DDDR ICDs, simplifying the surgical procedure, minimizing transvenous hardware, and eliminating the possibility of hazardous pacemaker-ICD interactions.     

Clinical Evaluation of Morphology Discrimination: An Algorithm for Rhythm Discrimination in Cardioverter Defibrillators

The aim of this study was to test the new morphology discrimination diagnostic algorithm for ICDs that differentiates supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) from VTs by analysis of ventricular depolarization complexes morphology. Twenty-five patients implanted with a St. Jude Ventritex single chamber ICD were studied during electrophysiological evaluation at predischarge and were followed for 7 +/- 4 months. Sensitivity and specificity for VT detection and overall diagnostic accuracy of the morphology discrimination algorithm were calculated on 326 detected events. At electrophysiological evaluation, the algorithm was tested during 67 episodes of right atrial pacing, during 119 episodes of RV pacing (at basal interventricular septum and RV apex) and during 27 episodes of sustained AF: specificity was 98%, sensitivity was 66%, and diagnostic accuracy was 80%. All episodes of AF were correctly diagnosed as SVT. Exclusion of detections related to pacing at the basal interventricular septum, resulted in a specificity of 98%, a sensitivity of 85%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 93%. During follow-up, evaluation of the morphology discrimination algorithm on 113 spontaneous episodes (31 VTs, 31 AF, 7 SVTs, and 44 sinus tachycardias) exhibited a specificity of 89%, a sensitivity of 100%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 92%. In conclusion, the morphology discrimination algorithm exhibits a high specificity in discriminating VTs from SVTs, although with a corresponding reduction in sensitivity. The preliminary experience on spontaneous episodes is promising. To correct for the reduction in sensitivity, it is advisable to use this algorithm in parallel with other algorithms for rhythm discrimination (sudden onset, stability) coupled with extended high rate.     

Incidence and significance of far-field R wave sensing in a VDD-implantable cardioverter defibrillator

BACKGROUND: A VDD-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) provides atrioventricular (AV) synchronous stimulation when necessary and incorporates the advantages of dual chamber arrhythmia discrimination algorithms both at potentially lower costs and less periprocedural complications than a DDD-ICD system. A prerequisite for correct dual chamber ICD function is reliable atrial sensing. METHODS: We evaluated atrial near- and ventricular far-field sensing and its impact on the dual-chamber detection algorithm in 106 patients with a single-lead VDD-ICD during a 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Six hundred and thirty-nine follow-ups were included. Mean near-field amplitude was 3.82 +/- 1.76 mV; mean far-field amplitude was 0.31 +/- 0.15 mV. 46% of patients had far-fields >0.35 mV and 35% of patients showed atrial EGM markers corresponding to a ventricular far-field in at least one follow-up. Six hundred and forty-five tachycardia episodes were evaluated. Due to far-field sensing, three of 66 episodes (4.5%) of sinus tachycardia were misclassified as ventricular tachycardia (VT), leading to antitachycardia therapies. Delayed detection of VT was seen in a 12 of 323 episodes (3.7%) in five of 62 patients (8%) having VT events (delay 6.4 +/- 6.0 seconds (range 2-24 seconds)). Stable far-field amplitudes <0.2 mV in a follow-up had a high negative predictive value for the occurrence of malfunction during tachycardia-conversely, high far-field amplitudes or a high incidence of far-field markers are only moderately correlated with malfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular far-field sensing in a VDD-ICD is not uncommon, however, tachycardia detection by the dual chamber algorithm is not seriously impaired by far-field sensing.     

A prospective randomized-controlled trial of ventricular fibrillation detection time in a DDDR ventricular defibrillator. Ventak AV II DR Study Investigators

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) with dual chamber and dual chamber rate responsive pacing may offer hemodynamic advantages for some ICD patients. Separate ICDs and DDDR pacemakers can result in device to device interactions, inappropriate shocks, and underdetection of ventricular fibrillation (VF). The objectives of this study were to compare the VF detection times between the Ventak AV II DR and the Ventak AV during high rate DDDR and DDD pacing and to test the safety of dynamic ventricular refractory period shortening. Patients receiving an ICD were randomized in a paired comparison to pacing at 150 beats/min (DDD pacing) or 175 beats/min (DDDR pacing) during ICD threshold testing to create a "worst case scenario" for VF detection. The VF detection rate was set to 180 beats/min, and VF was induced during high rate pacing with alternating current. The device was then allowed to detect and treat VF. The induction was repeated for each patient at each programmed setting so that all patients were tested at both programmed settings. Paired analysis was performed. Patient characteristics were a mean age of 69 +/- 11 years, 78% were men, coronary artery disease was present in 85%, and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.34 +/- 0.11. Fifty-two episodes of VF were induced in 26 patients. Despite the high pacing rate, all VF episodes were appropriately detected. The mean VF detection time was 2.4 +/- 1.0 seconds during DDD pacing and 2.9 +/- 1.9 seconds during DDDR pacing (P = NS). DDD and DDDR programming resulted in appropriate detection of all episodes of VF with similar detection times despite the "worst case scenario" tested. Delays in detection may be seen with long programmed ventricular refractory periods which shorten the VF sensing window and may be avoided with dynamic ventricular refractory period shortening.     

An adaptive interval-based algorithm for withholding ICD therapy during sinus tachycardia

Avoiding inappropriate ICD therapy during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) while assuring 100% sensitivity for VT/VF remains a challenge. Inappropriate VT/VF therapy during sinus tachycardia (ST) is particularly distressing to the patient because the full sequence of ICD therapies is often delivered. ST or 1:1 atrial tachycardia (AT) with long PR intervals and ST or AT with atrial oversensing of far-field R waves cause the majority of inappropriate therapy in the Medtronic GEM DR (Model 7271) ICD. The goals of the present effort were to define an adaptive interval-based algorithm for withholding VT/VF therapy in dual chamber ICDs during ST and to compare performance of the adaptive algorithm with that of the original ST withholding algorithm in the GEM DR. The adaptive algorithm uses a combination of 1:1 atrial to ventricular conduction pattern, changes in RR intervals and changes in intrinsic PR intervals to establish evidence for or against the presence of ST. Performances of the adaptive and original ST withholding algorithms were compared on 3 databases collected by implanted GEM DR devices. The first database included 684 spontaneous VT/VF episodes. The second database included 216 spontaneous SVT episodes that received inappropriate VT/VF therapy. These databases included up to 2,000 atrial or ventricular sensed or paced events preceding the spontaneous tachycardias. The third database included 320 spontaneous ST/AT episodes for which therapy was appropriately withheld by the GEM DR. Performance of the adaptive algorithm on the third database was predicted rather than directly computed because of record length limitations. VT/VF therapy was classified as "withheld" if evidence of ST remained high for one algorithm (i.e., at least 7 more beats to VT/VF detection) at the point of VT/VF detection by the other algorithm. For the 684 true VT/VF episodes, the original algorithm withheld VT/VF therapy in 5 episodes and the adaptive algorithm withheld VT/VF therapy in 3 episodes. The 95% confidence interval for the difference in VT/VF sensitivity between the adaptive and original algorithms was [-0.5 to + 1.1%]. Twelve of the 320 ST/AT episodes (3.8%) that were appropriately classified by the original algorithm were predicted to receive inappropriate therapy by the adaptive algorithm. However, relative to the original algorithm, the adaptive algorithm appropriately withheld VT/VF therapy for 76 of 216 true SVT episodes (i.e., incremental specificity of 35.2%). For the specific SVT episodes that were the targets for improvement by the adaptive ST algorithm (ST/AT with long PR intervals and ST/AT with intermittent atrial oversensing of far-field R waves), the adaptive algorithm reduced inappropriate therapy by 63.2%.     

Adjustable atrial and ventricular temporary electrode for low-energy termination of tachyarrhythmias early after cardiac surgery

Supraventricular and ventricular tachycardias are common and serious postoperative complications early after cardiac surgery. We introduce a completely removable temporary adjustable defibrillation electrode (TADE) for low energy cardioversion/defibrillation of postoperative atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The electrode consists of three loops of steel wires connected to one steel wire, which are movable within an isolation sheet for adjusting the active surface to the individual size of the heart chambers. Evaluation of the electrode was performed in 10 open-chest beagles with a mean weight of 25.5 kg. The electrodes were first positioned on the left and right atrium. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was induced via a bipolar temporary heart wire. Atrial defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were measured according to a step-down shock protocol (5-0.4 J). Thereafter, the electrodes were adjusted and positioned on the right and left ventricle. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced and DFTs were recorded the same way. Aortic flow and pressure and left ventricular pressure were continuously monitored throughout the experiment. For termination of AF, mean DFTs were 0.4 +/- 0 J (lowest possible shock level) with a mean shock impedance of 70 +/- 7.6 ohms. VF was terminated with a mean DFT of 3 +/- 1.1 J with a mean impedance 56.1 +/- 7.9 ohms. Complete transcutaneous removal of the electrodes was possible in all animals without any complications. In conclusion, successful low energy termination of AF and VF is possible with the tested temporary adjustable electrode. A clinical study is planned for further evaluation.     

European clinical experience with a dual chamber single pass sensing and pacing defibrillation lead

Dual chamber ICDs are increasingly implanted nowadays, mainly to improve discrimination between supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias but also to maintain AV synchrony in patients with bradycardia. The aim of this study was to investigate a new single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead capable of true bipolar sensing and pacing in the right atrium and integrated bipolar sensing and pacing in the right ventricle. The performance of the lead was evaluated in 57 patients (age 61 +/- 12 years; New York Heart Association 1.9 +/- 0.6, left ventricular ejection fraction 0.38 +/- 0.15) at implant, at prehospital discharge, and during a 1-year follow-up. Sensing and pacing behavior of the lead was evaluated in six different body positions. In four patients, no stable position of the atrial electrode could intraoperatively be found. The intraoperative atrial sensing was 2.3 +/- 1.6 mV and the atrial pacing threshold 0.8 +/- 0.5 V at 0.5 ms. At follow-up, the atrial sensing ranged from 1.5 mV to 2.2 mV and the atrial pacing threshold product from 0.8 to 1.7 V/ms. In 11 patients, an intermittent atrial sensing problem and in 24 patients an atrial pacing dysfunction were observed in at least one body position. In 565 episodes, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96.5% were found for ventricular arrhythmias. In conclusion, this single pass defibrillation lead performed well as a VDD lead and for dual chamber arrhythmia discrimination. However, loss of atrial capture in 45% of patients preclude its use in patients depending on atrial pacing.     

Pitfalls of the concept of incremental specificity used in comparisons of dual chamber VT/VF detection algorithms

The concepts of incremental specificity and incremental positive predictive accuracy (PPA) have been proposed to measure the success of dual chamber cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) algorithms for tachyarrhythmia detection in improving specificity while maintaining very high sensitivity to detection of episodes of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF). While dual chamber VT/VF detection algorithms differ substantially among different ICD manufacturers, they all operate as "add-on" features to the single chamber elementary detection algorithms that are based on simple criteria of increased ventricular rate. The incremental specificity and PPA characterize the performance of the dual chamber detection operation in this "add-on" mode, that is within a database of rhythm episodes all meet the simple rate-based criteria. A statistical model of hypothetical devices has been used to demonstrate that the concepts of incremental specificity and PPA are very dependent on the composition of the database used to evaluate a particular dual chamber ICD. Because some sinus tachycardia and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias with regular atrioventricular conduction are more easily discriminated from true VT/VF than other supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, the model shows that rather than the performance of the dual chamber detection functions, the major contributor to the incremental specificity may be the proportion between the "easy" and "difficult" supraventricular episodes. The algorithms used by different ICD manufacturers to detect tachyarrhythmias based on ventricular rate are known to differ substantially in the ability to differentiate true VT/VF from other tachyarrhythmias. Consequently, the databases of rhythms against which the different dual camber ICDs are tested are also different in composition of different types of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Therefore, the values of incremental specificity and PPA reported by different manufacturers do not have an equivalent meaning and do not offer a valid comparison of the true performance of different dual chamber ICDs.     

Significance of Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients with Implanted Pacing Cardioverter Defibrillators

Eighty-six patients were treated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) because of sustained ventricalar tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). In 27 patients an epicardial system was used, in 59 patients a transvenous system with a subcutaneous patch electrode was implanted. During a mean follow-up time of 17 ± 9 months, inappropriate activations of the ICD due to supraventricular tachycardia were documented by Holter monitoring in 14 patients (16%). In 8 patients paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), in 2 patients chronic AF, in 1 patient atrial flutter, and in 3 patients sinus tachycardia triggered antitachycardia pacing functions (12 patients) or internal defibrillation (2 patients). In 3 patients (5%) VT was induced by inappropriate antitachycardia pacing. In an additional 18 patients (21%) inappropriate activation of antitachycardia functions due to atrial tachyarrhythmias were suspected based on telemetry readouts or the patient's history. Inappropriate activation of ICD therapy triggered by intermittent supraventricular tachyarrhythmias is common. Further improvements of detection algorithms for supraventricular tachycardia are required in future device generations.     

Advanced Pacemaker Diagnostic Features in the Characterization of Atrial Fibrillation: Impact on Preventive Pacing Algorithms

YANG, A., et al .: Advanced Pacemaker Diagnostic Features in the Characterization of Atrial Fibrillation: Impact on Preventive Pacing Algorithms. Pacing algorithms to prevent PAF are mainly based on the suppression of premature atrial complexes (PACs), which play an important role in its initiation. In contrast to 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiograms, advanced pacemaker (PM) diagnostic features are capable of recording AF episodes during long follow-up periods and of characterizing AF in a detailed fashion. For the specific use of these algorithms, a detailed characterization of AF was performed in 91 dual chamber PM recipients with histories of AF. Fifteen patients with episodes of oversensing due to far-field signals or frequent episodes of "2:1-undersensing" of atrial flutter were excluded. The remaining 76 patients had high recurrence rates of AF (median 0.8 episodes/day), however, the majority of episodes lasted <7 minutes. Despite frequent PACs (median 10.8/hour) during sinus rhythm, a median of 66.4% of the AF episodes were preceded by <2 PACs/min before onset. In conclusion, frequent, short-lived AF episodes seem best suited for AF preventive pacing therapies. However, the small number of PACs preceding many AF episodes may limit the efficacy of PAC suppressing algorithms. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. II]:310–313)     

Prospective evaluation of catheter ablation in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators and multiple inappropriate ICD therapies due to atrial fibrillation and type I atrial flutter

The high incidence of inappropriate therapies due to drug refractory supraventricular tachycardia remains a major unsolved problem of the ICD. Most of the inappropriate therapies for supraventricular tachycardia are caused by AF and type I atrial flutter with rapid ventricular response. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the usefulness of AVN modulation or ablation for rapid AF and ablation of the tricuspid annulus-inferior vena cava (TA-IVC) isthmus for type I atrial flutter in ICD patients with frequent inappropriate ICD interventions. Eighteen consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. Twelve patients received a mean of 34 +/- 36 antitachycardia pacing (ATP) and 41 +/- 32 shock therapies for rapid AF during 49 +/- 39 months, and 6 patients a mean of 111 +/- 200 ATP and 11 +/- 8 shock therapies for type I atrial flutter during 52 +/- 37 months preceding ablation procedure. Modification of the AVN was successful in 10 (83%) of 12 AF patients, in 2 (17%) patients ablation of the AVN was performed. A complete TA-IVC isthmus block was achieved in 5 (83%) of 6 atrial flutter patients. Three (25%) AF patients had 11 +/- 24 recurrences of ATP and 0.4 +/- 1.1 shock therapies for rapid AF during 15 +/- 7 months. None of the atrial flutter patients had recurrences of inappropriate therapies for type I atrial flutter during 14 +/- 8 months, but two (33%) patients had inappropriate ICD therapies for type II atrial flutter or rapid AF. There was an overall mean incidence of 18 +/- 22 inappropriate ICD therapies per 6 months before and 4 +/- 9 per 6 months after the ablation procedure (P < 0.05). In conclusion, radiofrequency catheter modification or ablation of the AVN for rapid AF and ablation for atrial flutter type I are demonstrated to be highly effective in the majority of ICD patients with drug refractory multiple inappropriate ICD therapies.     

Rhythm Discrimination by Rate Branch and QRS Morphology in Dual Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators

BORIANI, G., et al. : Rhythm Discrimination by Rate Branch and QRS Morphology in Dual Chamber Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators. Morphology Discrimination is a discriminator based on QRS morphology analysis that has been recently implemented in dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Detected events are initially classified according to median atrial and ventricular rates (Rate Branch). Then, a series of discriminators (Morphology Discrimination, Stability, Sudden Onset) analyze the rhythm according to specific criteria and the number of discriminators required for VT diagnosis (i.e., requiring "any" or "all" of the specific discriminators to indicate VT). The discriminating accuracy of the algorithm was evaluated in 645 detections recorded during the follow-up of 25 patients. The overall specificity for 397 supraventricular arrhythmias was 73.5% (292/397) with the tachycardia diagnosis criteria set to "any" and 90.9% (361/397) with the tachycardia diagnosis criteria set to "all." Sensitivity for VT was 100% and 98.7% (231/234) with the tachycardia diagnosis criteria set to "any" and "all," respectively. With the tachycardia diagnosis criteria set to "any," specificity for atrial fibrillation was 88.6%, for atrial flutter 40.3%, for atrial tachycardia 0%, and for sinus tachycardia 97.0%. With the tachycardia diagnosis criteria set to "all," specificity for atrial fibrillation was 92.40%, for atrial flutter 93.5%, for atrial tachycardia 54.7%, and for sinus tachycardia 99.0%. The contribution of Morphology Discrimination was crucial to improve the specificity of the Rate Branch algorithm. The implementation of Morphology Discrimination in a dual chamber ICD with Rate Branch rhythm classification allows the attainment of high specificity and high sensitivity for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. II]:466–470)     

Preliminary Clinical Experience with the First Dual Chamber Pacemaker Defibrillator

The lack of specificity of VT detection is a significant shortcoming of current ICDs. In a French multicenter study, 18 patients underwent implantation of the Defender 9001 (ELA Medical), an ICD utilizing dual chamber pacing and arrhythmia detection. Over a mean follow-up period of 7.1 ± 4.5 months, 176 tachycardia episodes recorded in the device memory were analyzed, and physician diagnosis was compared with that by the device. All 122 VT/VF episodes were correctly diagnosed, as were 51 of 53 supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Two episodes of AF with rapid regular ventricular rates were treated as VT, and a third episode, treated as VT, could not be diagnosed with certainty. A dual chamber pacemaker defibrillator offers improved diagnostic specificity without loss of sensitivity, in addition to the hemodynamic benefit of dual chamber pacing. (PACE 1997;20     

Transcutaneous T Wave Shock: A Universal Method for Ventricular Fibrillation Induction

Our objective was to develop a universal noninvasive method for VF induction. ICD implantation requires VF induction. Conventional rapid ventricular stimulation may fail to induce VF. Some ICDs can deliver low energy shocks on the T wave to induce VF. We hypothesized that an external dual chamber pacemaker and an external defibrillator could be configured to allow reliable VF induction with any ICD system. A surface ECC signal was delivered to the atrial channel of an external dual chamber DDD pacemaker. The 'AV' delay was adjusted so that the ventricular output of the pacemaker was delivered to an external defibrillator synchronized to deliver 5–50 J. Twenty-six patients at ICD implant or follow-up had VF induced in native rhythm (sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation), or during a ventricular pacing train (3–8 beats at cycle length 500–880 ms). VF was successfully induced in 14 of 25 (56%) patients in native rhythm; and in 16 of 17 (94%) patients during pacing (P = 0.013). VF induction success rate was 36% in native rhythm (31/86 attempts) and 88% during pacing (69/78 attempts) (P < 0.001). The 'R' to shock interval was 269 ± 31 ms in native rhythm and 257 ± 48 ms during pacing. Energy delivered from the external defibrillator was 19 ± 3 J in native rhythm and 21 ± 6 J during pacing. We concluded that VF induction by synchronizing a small external shock to the T wave is a fast, effective way to reliably ensure arrhythmia induction with any ICD at implant or follow-up. This method is more successful during pacing than in sinus rhythm.