An analysis of errors causing morbidity and mortality in a trauma system: a guide for quality improvement.

The purpose of auditing trauma care is to maintain quality assurance and to guide quality improvement. This study was conducted to identify the incidence, type, and setting of errors leading to morbidity and mortality in trauma patients. Determinations of the Medical Audit Committee of San Diego County were reviewed and classified by the authors for identification of preventable errors leading to morbidity or mortality. Errors were classified by type and categorized by phase of care. Errors were identified in the cases of 4% of all patients admitted for trauma care over a 4-year period. Of all trauma patient deaths, 5.9% were considered preventable or potentially preventable. The most common single error across all phases of care was failure to appropriately evaluate the abdomen. Although errors in the resuscitative and operative phases were more common, critical care errors had the greatest impact on preventable death. The detected error rate of 4% may represent the baseline error rate in a trauma system. While regionalized trauma care has dramatically reduced the incidence of preventable death after injury, efforts to further reduce preventable morbidity and mortality may be guided by an identification of common errors in a trauma system and their relationship to outcome.     

Five years experience of trauma care in a German urban level I university trauma center

Background:   

A regionalized approach to trauma care with the implementation of designated level I trauma centers has been shown to improve survival after multiple injuries. Our study aimed to describe the current reality in an urban German level I university trauma center concerning the primary admission of patients into the emergency room.     

Impact of a trauma service on trauma care in a university hospital

This study describes the experience in a major university hospital for a year before and a year after the institution of a trauma service. Demographic data and severity of injury were similar before and after the trauma service was instituted. Nonetheless, mortality for all trauma patients admitted to an intensive care unit decreased somewhat (from 16.1 to 11.8 percent) in the second period of study. When outcome for trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit was examined, the differences was more impressive, with a reduction in mortality from 27 percent to 6.1 percent. This reduction seemed to be due largely to a decrease in the number of patients who died from sepsis, multiple organ failure, or both. We suggest that trauma care can be significantly improved by an organized approach to the care of the multiply injured patient. A powerful argument can be made for organizing care of injured patients in major hospitals along the lines of a dedicated trauma service.     

Profile of chest trauma in a level I trauma center

BACKGROUND: Chest injuries are seen with increasing frequency in urban hospitals. The profile of chest injuries depends on the size of the hospital and the level of trauma center. The data regarding the true incidence of chest trauma are scant. METHODS: One thousand three hundred fifty-nine consecutive patients seen at a Level I trauma center were analyzed. The nature of injury, methods of treatment, and morbidity and mortality were recorded in a prospective manner and analyzed retrospectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors of mortality after chest trauma. RESULTS: The overall mortality was 9.41%. Low Glasgow Coma Scale score, older age, presence of penetrating chest injury, long bone fractures, fracture of more than five ribs, and liver and spleen injuries were independent predictors of death after chest trauma. A model was created for predicting the mortality based on various factors. CONCLUSION: Most chest injuries can be treated with simple observation. Only 18.32% of patients required tube thoracostomy and 2.6% needed thoracotomy. Low Glasgow Coma Scale score and advanced age are the most significant independent predictors of mortality.     

Emergency room thoracotomy: updated guidelines for a level I trauma center

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether 1995 study conclusions influenced patient selection and subsequent survival and whether indications for emergency room thoracotomy (ERT) could be further limited on the basis of patient physiologic status. A retrospective review of patient demographics, physiologic status both at the scene and on arrival to the emergency room (ER), and survival was performed on those who underwent ERT from July 1995 to December 1999. Sixty-five patients underwent ERT for sustained gunshot wounds and 14 patients for stab wounds. There were no survivors from Class I or II at the scene or Class I on presentation to the ER. Although there was a significant decrease in patients of Class I at the scene (27% vs 8%) and in the ER (58.3% vs 35.4%) the overall survival rate remained the same (2.6%). ERT could be eliminated for patients of Class I or II at the scene and for those of Class I on arrival to the ER without negating survivors; survival would improve to 16.2 per cent.     

A Gastroschisis bundle: effects of a quality improvement protocol on morbidity and mortality

Objective

Gastroschisis incidence is rising. Survival in developed countries is over 95%. However, in underdeveloped countries, mortality is higher than 15% often due to sepsis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on morbidity and mortality of a Quality Improvement Protocol for out-born gastroschisis patients.

Detecting the blind spot: complications in the trauma registry and trauma quality improvement

BACKGROUND: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) has reduced complications for surgery patients in the Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma maintains the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) to track injured patient comorbidities, complications, and mortality. We sought to apply the NSQIP methodology to collect comorbidity and outcome data for trauma patients. Data were compared to the NTDB to determine the benefit and validity of using the NSQIP methodology for trauma. STUDY DESIGN: Utilizing the NSQIP methodology, data were collected from August 1, 2004 to July 31, 2005 on all adult patients admitted to the trauma service at a level 1 trauma center. NSQIP data were collected for general surgery patients during the same time period from the same institution. Data were also extracted from v5.0 of the NTDB for patients >or=18 years old admitted to level 1 trauma centers. Comparisons between University of Michigan (UM) NSQIP Trauma and UM NSQIP General Surgery patients and between UM NSQIP Trauma and NTDB (2004) patients were performed using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Before risk adjustment, there was a difference in mortality between the UM NSQIP Trauma and NTDB (2004) groups with univariate analysis (8.4% vs 5.7%; odds ratio [OR], 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-0.9; P = .01). This survival advantage reversed to favor the UM NSQIP Trauma patient group when risk adjustment was performed (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6-3.4; P < .001). The UM NSQIP Trauma group had more complications than the UM NSQIP general surgery patients. Despite having a lower risk-adjusted rate of mortality, the UM NSQIP Trauma patients had significantly higher rates of complications (wound infection, wound disruption, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, deep vein thrombosis, and sepsis) than the NTDB (2004) patients in both univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Complications occurred more frequently in trauma patients than general surgery patients. The UM NSQIP Trauma patients had higher rates of complications than reported in the NTDB. The NTDB data potentially underreport important comorbidity and outcome data. Application of the NSQIP methodology to trauma may present an improved means of effectively tracking and reducing adverse outcomes in a risk-adjusted manner.     

Impact of minimal injuries on a level I trauma center.

Overtriage (i.e.; transport of patients with minimal injuries to a trauma center) has been accepted as necessary to avoid missing clinically significant injuries. We reviewed our experience with 344 patients (ISS less than or equal to 4) who were admitted to a level I trauma center during a 2-year period. The trauma team was activated for 209 patients (TA), and emergency department referrals accounted for 135 (ED). One hundred seventy-three patients (TA = 64%, ED = 36%) met American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma (ACSCOT) field triage criteria (FTC). Mechanism of injury, especially ejection from a motor vehicle, was the most frequently utilized FTC indicator. We found no differences between the TA and ED groups relative to Trauma Score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Injury Severity Score, length of stay, or ICU days. Mean total costs were higher for the TA group than for the ED group. The TA group had a higher nursing acuity level than the ED group. Compliance with FTC yields an inherent overtriage of minimally injured patients; however, noncompliance with FTC compounds the overtriage rate. Failure to comply with FTC is costly, labor intensive, and may represent misuse of the trauma system. We propose continual re-education of prehospital personnel, increased responsibility of all hospitals in the trauma center catchment area, and protocols for "downstaging" trauma resuscitation in minimally injured patients.     

Power stapling in trauma surgery. An improvement of trauma surgery technique?]

Power staple fixation of fracture fragments represent an enrichment of technological possibilities in adaptive osteosynthesis. We gained some experience with a variety of indications. The advantage of this method can be seen in the simple and fast way of application. Observing limited indications excellent results can be achieved.     

Prevalence of chest trauma, associated injuries and mortality: a level I trauma centre experience

A review of prospectively collected data in our trauma unit for the years 1998–2003 was undertaken. Adult patients who suffered multiple trauma with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of ≥16, admitted to hospital for more than 72 hours and with sustained blunt chest injuries were included in the study. Demographic details including pre-hospital care, trauma history, admission vital signs, blood transfusions, details of injuries and their abbreviated injury scores (AIS), operations, length of intensive care unit and hospital stays, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and mortality were analysed. Fulfilling the inclusion criteria with at least one chest injury were 1,164 patients. The overall mortality reached 18.7%. As expected, patients in the higher AIS groups had both a higher overall ISS and mortality rate with one significant exception; patients with minor chest injuries (AIS_chest = 1) were associated with mortality comparable to injuries involving an AIS_chest = 3. Additionally, the vast majority of polytraumatised patients with an AIS_chest = 1 died in ICU sooner than patients of groups 2–5.     

ACS trauma centre designation and outcomes of post-traumatic ARDS: NTDB analysis and implications for trauma quality improvement

Background

Several authors have examined the relationship between outcomes following severe trauma and American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma centre designation. Little is known, however, about the association between ACS level and outcomes following complications of trauma.

Methods

The National Trauma Databank (NTDB, v. 5.0) was queried to identify adult (Age ≥18) trauma patients developing post-traumatic ARDS, who were admitted to either ACS level 1 or level 2 trauma centres from 2000 to 2004. Patients transferred between institutions and injuries following burns were excluded. Univariate analysis was used to assess differences between those patients admitted to ACS level 1 and level 2 facilities. Adjusted mortality was derived using logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 902 adult trauma patients with ARDS after 48 h of mechanical ventilation were identified from the NTDB. Five hundred and thirty six patients were admitted to a level 1 ACS verified centre and 366 to a level 2 facility. Univariate analysis revealed no statistical differences in clinical and demographic characteristics between the two groups. On univariate comparison, patients admitted to level 1 facilities had longer mean hospital and ICU length of stay and higher hospital related charges than level 2 counterparts. Patients admitted to a level 1 centre were, however, significantly more likely to achieve discharge to home. Using multivariate logistic regression, ACS level designation was shown to have no statistical effect on mortality. Hypotension on admission and age greater than 55 were the only independent predictors of mortality.

Conclusion

ACS trauma centre designation level is not an independent predictor of mortality following post-traumatic ARDS.     

Resident training level and quality of anesthesia care in a university hospital

In this study, we analyzed the relationship between resident training and patient safety in anesthesia. A retrospective quality improvement database review was used to calculate the relative risk of any quality problem and specific types of quality problems (injury, escalation of care, or operational inefficiency) between anesthesia teams with CA1, CA2, and CA3 residents. It was expected that teams with less experienced residents (CA1) would have more frequent quality problems than teams with more experienced residents (CA2 and CA3 teams). Data showed that risk of injury did not differ between CA1, CA2, and CA3 teams. CA2 teams had higher rates of critical incidents and escalation of care than CA1 and CA3 teams and higher rates of operational inefficiency than CA3 teams. The CA2 yr is when residents move into specialty training, requiring more advanced skills and a larger knowledge base. Their higher relative risk for critical incidents, escalation of care, and operational inefficiencies may reflect lack of experience, uncertainty, and less skill mastery compared with CA3 residents. The higher inefficiency and escalation of care rates associated with CA2 teams may translate into larger costs for the institution. IMPLICATIONS: Appropriate supervision of anesthesia residents helps to ensure patient safety. Anesthesia management problems are most common during the CA2 yr and result in higher costs for the institution.     

District-level hospital trauma care audit filters: Delphi technique for defining context-appropriate indicators for quality improvement initiative evaluation in developing countries

IntroductionProspective clinical audit of trauma care improves outcomes for the injured in high-income countries (HICs). However, equivalent, context-appropriate audit filters for use in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) district-level hospitals have not been well established. We aimed to develop context-appropriate trauma care audit filters for district-level hospitals in Ghana, was well as other LMICs more broadly.MethodsConsensus on trauma care audit filters was built between twenty panellists using a Delphi technique with four anonymous, iterative surveys designed to elicit: (i) trauma care processes to be measured; (ii) important features of audit filters for the district-level hospital setting; and (iii) potentially useful filters. Filters were ranked on a scale from 0 to 10 (10 being very useful). Consensus was measured with average percent majority opinion (APMO) cut-off rate. Target consensus was defined a priori as: a median rank of ≥9 for each filter and an APMO cut-off rate of ≥0.8.ResultsPanellists agreed on trauma care processes to target (e.g. triage, phases of trauma assessment, early referral if needed) and specific features of filters for district-level hospital use (e.g. simplicity, unassuming of resource capacity). APMO cut-off rate increased successively: Round 1 – 0.58; Round 2 – 0.66; Round 3 – 0.76; and Round 4 – 0.82. After Round 4, target consensus on 22 trauma care and referral-specific filters was reached. Example filters include: triage – vital signs are recorded within 15 min of arrival (must include breathing assessment, heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation if available); circulation – a large bore IV was placed within 15 min of patient arrival; referral – if referral is activated, the referring clinician and receiving facility communicate by phone or radio prior to transfer.ConclusionThis study proposes trauma care audit filters appropriate for LMIC district-level hospitals. Given the successes of similar filters in HICs and obstetric care filters in LMICs, the collection and reporting of prospective trauma care audit filters may be an important step towards improving care for the injured at district-level hospitals in LMICs.     

Nonaccidental trauma is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients at a regional level 1 pediatric trauma center

Background

Traumatic injuries are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children. The purpose of the present study was to determine the incidence of nonaccidental trauma (NAT) and to compare the outcomes of accidental trauma (AT) patients with NAT patients at a large pediatric trauma center.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of 6186 trauma patients younger than 18 years evaluated during the period of 1996 to 2004.

Results

During the period of study, NAT accounted for 7.3% (n = 453) of trauma evaluations (n = 6186). Compared to AT, the NAT patient was younger, 12 vs 76 months (P < .05); were more severely injured, injury severity score 18 vs 9 (P < .05); and required both longer intensive care unit stay, 2 vs 1 day (P < .05), and overall hospital stay, 6 vs 3 days (P < .05). Craniotomy was required in 4.4% of NAT patients compared with 2.7 % of AT patients (P < .05). Abdominal exploration was necessary in 3.5% of NAT patients compared to 1.6% of AT patients. The mortality rate for NAT was 9.7% compared to 2.2% for AT (P < .05).

Conclusions

The surgeon caring for children must appreciate the high incidence of NAT with its increased morbidity and mortality relative to AT patients. A surgical evaluation should be performed promptly in NAT patients because of their frequent need for emergent intervention.