Pediatric acute kidney injury: the use of the RIFLE criteria

Outcome in pediatric acute kidney injury (AKI) is in part related to diagnosis and intervention. Standard markers of severity of illness do not identify AKI. Modified RIFLE criteria are shown to identify patients who develop AKI, potentially allowing for early intervention.     

Modified RIFLE criteria in critically ill children with acute kidney injury

A classification system has been proposed to standardize the definition of acute kidney injury in adults. These criteria of risk, injury, failure, loss, and end-stage renal disease were given the acronym of RIFLE. We have modified the criteria based on 150 critically ill pediatric RIFLE (pRIFLE) patients to assess acute kidney injury incidence and course along with renal and/or non-renal comorbidities. Of these children, 11 required dialysis and 24 died. Patients without acute kidney injury in the first week of intensive care admission were less likely to subsequently develop renal Injury or Failure; however, 82% of acute kidney injury occurred in this initial week. Within this group of 123 children, 60 reached pRIFLEmax for Risk, 32 reached Injury, and 31 reached Failure. Acute kidney injury during admission was an independent predictor of intensive care; hospital length of stay and an increased risk of death independent of the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM II) score (odds ratio 3.0). Our results show that a majority of critically ill children develop acute kidney injury by pRIFLE criteria and do so early in the course of intensive care. Acute kidney injury is associated with mortality and may lead to increased hospital costs. We suggest that the pRIFLE criteria serves to characterize the pattern of acute kidney injury in critically ill children.     

RIFLE and Acute Kidney Injury Network classifications predict mortality in leptospirosis-associated acute kidney injury

Aim: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in leptospirosis. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between RIFLE and AKIN classifications with mortality in leptospirosis‐associated AKI. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in patients with leptospirosis admitted to tertiary hospitals in Brazil. The association between RIFLE and AKIN classifications with mortality was investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to investigate risk factors for death. Results: A total of 287 patients were included, with an average age of 37 ± 16 years, and 80.8% were male. Overall mortality was 13%. There was a significant association between these classifications and death. Among non‐survivors, 86% were in the class ‘failure’ and AKIN 3. Increased mortality was observed according to the worse classifications: ‘risk’ (R; 2%), ‘injury’ (I; 8%) and ‘failure’ (F; 23%), as well as in AKIN 1 (2%), AKIN 2 (8%) and AKIN 3 (23%) (P < 0.0001). The worst classifications were significantly associated with death: RIFLE F (odds ratio = 11.6, P = 0.018) and AKIN 3 (odds ratio = 12.8, P = 0.013). Receiver–operator curve for patients with AKI showed high areas under the curve (0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.67–0.74) for both RIFLE and AKIN classifications in determining the sensitivity for mortality. Conclusion: There is a significant association between RIFLE and AKIN classifications with mortality in patients with leptospirosis. Initiation of dialysis in patients with RIFLE F and AKIN 3 should always be considered.     

A systematic review of RIFLE criteria in children, and its application and association with measures of mortality and morbidity

The RIFLE criteria were developed to improve consistency in the assessment of acute kidney injury. The high face validity, collaborative development method, and validation against mortality have supported the widespread adoption of the RIFLE to evaluate adult patients; however, its inconsistent application in adult studies is associated with significant effects on the estimated incidence of acute kidney injury. As the RIFLE criteria are now being used to determine acute kidney injury in children, we conducted a systematic review to describe its application and assess associations between the RIFLE and measures of mortality and morbidity in pediatric patients. In 12 studies we found wide variation in the application of the RIFLE, including the range of assessed RIFLE categories, omission of urine output criteria, varying definitions of baseline renal function, and methods for handling missing baseline measurements. Limited and conflicting associations between the RIFLE and mortality, length of stay, illness severity, and measures of kidney function were found. Thus, although the RIFLE was developed to improve the consistency of defining acute kidney injury, there are still major discrepancies in its use in pediatric patients that may undermine its potential utility as a standardized measure of acute kidney injury in children.     

A multi-centre evaluation of the RIFLE criteria for early acute kidney injury in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Working Group recently developed the RIFLE criteria, a consensus definition for acute kidney injury (AKI). We sought to evaluate the RIFLE criteria on the day of ICU admission in a large heterogenous population of critically ill patients. METHODS: Retrospective interrogation of prospectively collected data from the Australian New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database. We evaluated 120 123 patients admitted for >/=24 h from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2005 from 57 ICUs across Australia. RESULTS: The median (IQR) age was 64.3 (50.8-75.4) years, 59.5% were male, 28.6% had co-morbid disease, 50.3% were medical admissions and the initial mean (+/-SD) APACHEII score was 16.9 (+/-7.7). According to the RIFLE criteria, on the day of admission, AKI occurred in 36.1%, with a maximum RIFLE category of Risk in 16.3%, Injury in 13.6%, and Failure 6.3%. AKI, defined by any RIFLE category, was associated with an increase in hospital mortality (OR 3.29, 95% CI 3.19-3.41, P < 0.0001). The crude hospital mortality stratified by RIFLE category was 17.9% for Risk, 27.7% for Injury and 33.2% for Failure. By multivariable analysis, each RIFLE category was independently associated with hospital mortality (OR: Risk 1.58, Injury 2.54 and Failure 3.22). CONCLUSION: In a large heterogenous cohort of critically ill patients, the RIFLE criteria classified >36% with AKI on the day of admission. For successive increases in severity of RIFLE category, there were increases in hospital mortality. The RIFLE criteria represent a simple tool for the detection and classification of AKI and for correlation with clinical outcomes.     

RIFLE标准在心脏术后急性肾损伤病人中的评价

目的 探讨RIFLE标准在心脏术后急性肾损伤(AKI)病人肾替代治疗时机选择中的作用及与预后的关系.方法 回顾分析145例心脏术后AKI病例,分为连续性静脉一静脉血液滤过(CVVH)组(98例)和非CVVH组(47例).应用RIFLE标准对AKI进行分期,对比分析各组病人的临床资料、疗效和预后.结果 AKI Ⅰ期和Ⅲ期中CVVH组与非CVVH组的医院病死率差异无统计学意义;Ⅱ期中非CVVH组的医院病死率高于CVVH组(58.8%对26.1%,P<0.0).CVVH组生存者中,CVVH治疗、尿量恢复、机械通气、ICU滞留和术后医院滞留时间随AKI分期的加重而延长.结论 RIFLE标准对心脏术后AKI早期诊断和判断预后有指导意义.必须强调肾脏替代时机的选择,在AKI Ⅱ期即行肾替代治疗可以明显改善预后,而CVVH比间断血液透析和腹膜透析更有优势.     

Chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Acute kidney injury may increase the risk for chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. In an attempt to summarize the literature and provide more compelling evidence, we conducted a systematic review comparing the risk for CKD, ESRD, and death in patients with and without AKI. From electronic databases, web search engines, and bibliographies, 13 cohort studies were selected, evaluating long-term renal outcomes and non-renal outcomes in patients with AKI. The pooled incidence of CKD and ESRD were 25.8 per 100 person-years and 8.6 per 100 person-years, respectively. Patients with AKI had higher risks for developing CKD (pooled adjusted hazard ratio 8.8, 95% CI 3.1-25.5), ESRD (pooled adjusted HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.9-5.0), and mortality (pooled adjusted HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.1) compared with patients without AKI. The relationship between AKI and CKD or ESRD was graded on the basis of the severity of AKI, and the effect size was dampened by decreased baseline glomerular filtration rate. Data were limited, but AKI was also independently associated with the risk for cardiovascular disease and congestive heart failure, but not with hospitalization for stroke or all-cause hospitalizations. Meta-regression did not identify any study-level factors that were associated with the risk for CKD or ESRD. Our review identifies AKI as an independent risk factor for CKD, ESRD, death, and other important non-renal outcomes.     

Predicting acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a systematic review

Acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery confers a significant increased risk of death. Several risk models have been developed to predict postoperative kidney failure after cardiac surgery. This systematic review evaluated the available risk models for AKI after cardiac surgery. Literature searches were performed in the Web of Science/Knowledge, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases for articles reporting the primary development of a risk model and articles reporting validation of existing risk models for AKI after cardiac surgery. Data on model variables, internal or external validation (or both), measures of discrimination, and measures of calibration were extracted. The systematic review included 7 articles with a primary development of a prediction score for AKI after cardiac surgery and 8 articles with external validation of established models. The models for AKI requiring dialysis are the most robust and externally validated. Among the prediction rules for AKI requiring dialysis after cardiac surgery, the Cleveland Clinic model has been the most widely tested thus far and has shown high discrimination in most of the tested populations. A validated score to predict AKI not requiring dialysis is lacking. Further studies are required to develop risk models to predict milder AKI not requiring dialysis after cardiac surgery. Standardizing risk factor and AKI definitions will facilitate the development and validation of risk models predicting AKI.     

Effect of renal replacement therapy modalities on renal recovery and mortality for acute kidney injury: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

Previous investigations showed inconsistent results for comparison in renal recovery, in-hospital, and in-intensive care unit (ICU) mortalities between acute kidney injury (AKI) patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and some kinds of intermittent renal replacement therapies (IRRTs). We systematically searched for articles published in the databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Medline, and Google Scholar) until June 2019. We made all statistical analysis using STATA 12.0 software. In the present meta-analysis, relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for binary outcomes (renal recovery status or mortality). The present study indicated no significant differences in renal recovery, in-hospital mortality, and in-ICU mortality between AKI patients given CRRT and those given sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED). Additionally, the study showed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between AKI patients given CRRT and those given intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), whereas elevated in-ICU mortality was detected in AKI patients given CRRT, compared to those given IHD. The three modalities (CRRT, IHD, and SLED) have their own advantages and disadvantages. More rigorous trials design with large cohort should be made to explore the differences in renal recovery, in-hospital, and in-ICU mortalities between different kinds of RRTs.     

Epidemiology,outcomes and validation of RIFLE and AKIN criteria in acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients: Indian perspective

Although the epidemiology and the impact of Acute Kidney Injury on outcomes are well-known in the Western literature, good data is lacking from India. Most studies published from India have not evaluated epidemiology of Acute Kidney Injury in the Intensive Care Unit setting and/or have not used validated criteria. In our observational study of 250 patients, admitted to a tertiary level ICU, we have explored the epidemiology of Acute Kidney Injury using both RIFLE and AKIN criteria and have validated them. We have also demonstrated that the severity of AKI is an independent predictor of mortality in critically ill patients. Our results are very much comparable to other studies and we feel that this study will remain as an epidemiological reference point for Indian clinicians dealing with AKI.     

Chronic kidney disease and mortality risk: a systematic review

Current guidelines identify people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) as being at high risk for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Because as many as 19 million Americans may have CKD, a comprehensive summary of this risk would be potentially useful for planning public health policy. A systematic review of the association between non-dialysis-dependent CKD and the risk for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was conducted. Patient- and study-related characteristics that influenced the magnitude of these associations also were investigated. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched, and reference lists through December 2004 were consulted. Authors of 10 primary studies provided additional data. Cohort studies or cohort analyses of randomized, controlled trials that compared mortality between those with and without chronically reduced kidney function were included. Studies were excluded from review when participants were followed for < 1 yr or had ESRD. Two reviewers independently extracted data on study setting, quality, participant and renal function characteristics, and outcomes. Thirty-nine studies that followed a total of 1,371,990 participants were reviewed. The unadjusted relative risk for mortality in participants with reduced kidney function compared with those without ranged from 0.94 to 5.0 and was significantly more than 1.0 in 93% of cohorts. Among the 16 studies that provided suitable data, the absolute risk for death increased exponentially with decreasing renal function. Fourteen cohorts described the risk for mortality from reduced kidney function, after adjustment for other established risk factors. Although adjusted relative hazards were consistently lower than unadjusted relative risks (median reduction 17%), they remained significantly more than 1.0 in 71% of cohorts. This review supports current guidelines that identify individuals with CKD as being at high risk for cardiovascular mortality. Determining which interventions best offset this risk remains a health priority.     

Predictors of postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe present study aimed to summarize the predictors of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients after hip surgery.MethodsA literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies assessing the predictors of AKI after hip fracture surgery. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) of those who experienced AKI compared to those who did not were calculated for each variable. Evidence was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.ResultsTen studies with 34 potential factors were included in the meta-analysis. In the primary analysis, 12 factors were associated with AKI, comprising males (OR 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14–1.36), advanced age (MD 2.28; 95% CI 0.80–3.75), myocardial infarction (OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.18–1.63), hypertension (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.13–1.89), diabetes (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.40–2.42), chronic kidney disease (OR 3.66; 95% CI 2.21–6.07), hip arthroplasty (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.22–1.50), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers use (OR 2.28; 95% CI 1.68–3.08), more intraoperative blood loss (MD 44.06; 95% CI 2.88–85.24), higher preoperative blood urea nitrogen levels (MD 5.29; 95% CI 3.38–7.20), higher preoperative serum creatinine levels (MD 0.4; 95% CI 0.26–0.53), and lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (MD −19.59; 95% CI −26.92–−12.26). Another 13 factors related to AKI in individual studies were identified in the systematic review.ConclusionRelated prophylaxis strategies should be implemented in patients involved with the above-mentioned characteristics to prevent AKI after hip surgery.     

Risk factors for acute renal injury in living donor liver transplantation: evaluation of the RIFLE criteria

Acute renal injury (ARI) is a serious complication after liver transplantation. This study investigated the usefulness of the RIFLE criteria in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and the prognostic impact of ARI after LDLT. We analyzed 200 consecutive adult LDLT patients, categorized as risk (R), injury (I), or failure (F), according to the RIFLE criteria. ARI occurred in 60.5% of patients: R‐class, 23.5%; I‐class, 21%; and F‐class, 16%. Four patients in Group‐A (normal renal function and R‐class) and 26 patients in Group‐B (severe ARI: I‐ and F‐class) required renal replacement therapy (P < 0.001). Mild ARI did not affect postoperative prognosis regarding hospital mortality rate in Group A (3.2%), which was superior to that in Group B (15.8%; P = 0.0015). Fourteen patients in Group B developed chronic kidney disease (KDIGO stage 3/4). The 1‐, 5‐ and 10‐year survival rates were 96.7%, 90.6%, and 88.1% for Group A and 71.1%, 65.9%, and 59.3% for Group B, respectively (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed risk factors for severe ARI as MELD ≥20 [odds ratio (OR) 2.9], small‐for‐size graft (GW/RBW <0.7%; OR 3.1), blood loss/body weight >55 ml/kg (OR 3.7), overexposure to calcineurin inhibitor (OR 2.5), and preoperative diabetes mellitus (OR 3.2). The RIFLE criteria offer a useful predictive tool after LDLT. Severe ARI, defined beyond class‐I, could have negative prognostic impact in the acute and late postoperative phases. Perioperative treatment strategies should be designed and balanced based on the risk factors for the further improvement of transplant prognosis.     

Incidence and mortality of postoperative acute kidney injury in non-dialysis patients: comparison between the AKIN and KDIGO criteria

Objectives This retrospective study determines whether the kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) criteria are superior to acute kidney injury network (AKIN) criteria in detecting non-dialysis AKI events and predicting mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients after surgery. Methods Surgical patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit were enrolled. Non-dialysis AKI cases were defined using either KDIGO or AKIN creatinine criteria and stratified by CKD stages. The adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) for in-hospital mortality are compared to those without AKI. The cumulative survival curves and the predictability for mortality are accessed by Kaplan–Meier method and calculating the area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, respectively. Results From a total of 826 postoperative patients, the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 11.6% (96 cases) and that for AKI according to KDIGO and AKIN criteria was 30.0% (248 cases) and 31.0% (256 cases). The cumulative survival curve stratified by CKD and AKI stages were comparable between KDIGO and AKIN criteria. The discriminative power for mortality stratified by CKD stages for KDIGO and AKIN criteria are as followed: all subjects: 0.678 versus 0.670 (both ps?<0.001); non-CKD: 0.800 versus 0.809 (both ps?<0.001); early-stage CKD: 0.676 versus 0.676 (both ps?<0.001); late-stage CKD: 0.674 versus 0.660 (ps were?<0.001 and 0.003). Conclusion The KDIGO criteria are superior to AKIN criteria in predicting mortality after surgery, especially in those with advanced CKD.