Improving guideline adherence for the diagnosis of ADHD in an ambulatory pediatric setting.

BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has published clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). However, implementation of guidelines has been notoriously difficult to achieve in the wider context of changing individual physicians' clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: Implement a formalized diagnostic protocol for ADHD and study whether this protocol improved adherence of pediatric residents and faculty to published guidelines for the diagnosis of ADHD. METHODS: Quasi-experimental retrospective record review of 63 pediatric patients evaluated for ADHD by pediatric residents and faculty in an outpatient pediatric clinic before (n = 25) and after (n = 38) implementation of a formal diagnostic process for ADHD. The key elements of the new diagnostic process include completion of a semistructured interview and mandatory rating scales for home and school. The published AAP guidelines include 1) documentation of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM) IV criteria; 2) evidence of core symptoms obtained directly from home and 3) from school; and 4) assessment for coexisting conditions. Adherence was assessed to each criterion individually (yes/no) and was summarized in a single score. RESULTS: Only 4% of clinicians and nurse practitioners diagnosing children in the before group adhered to all 4 AAP guidelines, compared to 82% in the after group (P < .001). Significant improvement was observed across each of the 4 criteria in the AAP guidelines. Moreover, the improvement in adherence to all 4 guidelines was noted for residents and faculty. CONCLUSION: A significant improvement in adherence to AAP guidelines was obtained for all providers through implementation of a structured diagnostic approach to ADHD.     

Scope of practice issues in the delivery of pediatric health care

In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of nonphysician pediatric clinicians and an expansion in their respective scopes of practice. This raises critical public policy and child health advocacy concerns. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) believes that optimal pediatric health care depends on a team-based approach with coordination by a physician leader, preferably a pediatrician. The pediatrician is uniquely suited to manage, coordinate, and supervise the entire spectrum of pediatric care, from diagnosis through all stages of treatment, in all practice settings. The AAP recognizes the valuable contributions of nonphysician clinicians, including nurse practitioners and physician assistants, in delivering optimal pediatric care. The AAP also believes that nonphysician clinicians who provide health care services in underserved areas should be supported by consulting pediatricians and other physicians using technologies including telemedicine. Pediatricians should serve as advocates for optimal pediatric care in state legislatures, public policy forums, and the media and should pursue opportunities to resolve scope of practice conflicts outside state legislatures. The AAP affirms that as nonphysician clinicians seek to expand their scopes of practice as providers of pediatric care, standards of education, training, examination, regulation, and patient care are needed to ensure patient safety and quality health care for all infants, children, adolescents, and young adults.     

Resident training in pediatric critical care transport medicine: a survey of pediatric residency programs

OBJECTIVE: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Program Requirement for Pediatrics includes specific objectives that pediatric residents participate in both the pre-hospital care of acutely ill or injured patients and the stabilization and transport of patients to critical care areas. Previously, residents were often included as the physician component for many pediatric critical care transport teams. Subsequent regionalization of transport services and development of nurse-only transport teams prompted us to determine the current level of resident participation in pediatric critical care transport as well as how individual residency programs were meeting the educational objectives. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to each pediatric residency program listed in the 1996-1997 GME Directory. Information was obtained regarding the size of the hospital and the residency program, the presence of a pediatric critical care transport team, the number of annual transports, and transport team leader. In addition, the use of pediatric residents for transports was ascertained, as well as their specific role, training requirements, and method of evaluation. RESULTS: Data were received from 138 programs for a return rate of 65%. Eighty percent of programs offered a pediatric critical care transport service. Nurse-led teams were used for 51% of NICU and 44% of PICU transports. Of the 82 NICU and 84 PICU teams that used residents, the majority used them as team leaders (60% and 70%; respectively) with only the minority requiring that they be at the PL-3 year or greater. The training and/or certification required for resident participation in transports varied among programs, with 85% requiring completion of a NICU or PICU rotation, and 94% requiring NRP or PALS certification. Programs that did not allow resident participation provided exposure to Transport Medicine by various mechanisms, including lectures and emergency department (ED) rotations. CONCLUSION: Pediatric resident participation in critical care transport varies widely among pediatric critical care transport teams. The degree to which residents participate in the transport team would appear to have diminished in comparison to previous studies. Transport teams often use other resources, such as nurses, fellows, or attendings, to lead their transport teams. Pediatric resident exposure to and participation in Transport Medicine varies among programs, as do the methods used to prepare residents for their experience.     

Pediatric Critical Care Interfacility Transport

The interfacility transport of critically ill and injured children can be safely performed by pediatric transport services. Specially trained transport staff, armed with appropriate equipment and medications and guided by off-line protocols and on-line medical control, provide a vital service for these children, facilitating timely access to tertiary care. Transport team members are trained to provide this specialized care in various environments, including ambulance, rotor wing, and fixed wing aircraft. Team training, continuing education, and quality improvement processes assist in further refining the skills and practices of the team members. Pediatric transport teams provide a unique service for these children and their families.     

The effect of a multidisciplinary team approach on weight gain in nonorganic failure-to-thrive children

Failure-to-thrive (FTT) is a chronic symptom accounting for 1% of all patients admitted to pediatric hospitals. FTT, which is traditionally attributed to organic (OFTT) and/or nonorganic (NFTT) causes, results in undernutrition. Undernutrition has potentially serious effects on child development, behavior, and cognitive skills. We undertook a study of children with FTT to determine whether multidisciplinary team treatment resulted in improved weight gain compared with children treated in a primary care setting. Fifty-three children with NFTT referred to our outpatient FTT consultative clinic and 107 children with NFTT identified as comparison subjects from our primary care clinic (PCC) were enrolled in the study. Growth outcomes over a 6-month follow-up were analyzed using growth quotient (GQ) analysis. Children followed in the multidisciplinary team clinic grew better (GQ = 1.75 +/- 0.39 SD) than did children in the PCC (GQ = 1.18 +/- 0.42 SD, p less than .001). The use of a multidisciplinary team offers special advantages in the rapid correction of undernutrition in children with NFTT.     

Pediatric victims involved in urban fires in Paris and its suburbs: Epidemiology,prehospital care,and lessons learned

AimThe literature includes few reports on the prehospital care of pediatric casualties of urban house fires. Here we aimed to describe the epidemiology of pediatric fire victims, focusing on their injuries, prehospital care, and survival.MethodsThis retrospective study included children under 15 years of age who were victims of urban house fires and who received care from prehospital medical teams. The variables analyzed included epidemiology, specific care provided by prehospital emergency services, the number of cardiac arrests, and survival rates.ResultsOver the 15-month study period, 365 house fires required the presence of at least one prehospital medical team. Casualties of these fires included 121 pediatric victims (median age, 4 years [interquartile range: 2–9 years]). All children were initially treated by a prehospital medical team that was not specialized in pediatrics. Six children (4.9%) received secondary treatment from a pediatric support team. Of the 121 children, 114 (94.2%) suffered from smoke inhalation and seven (5.8%) from burns. Two patients who were in cardiac arrest at their initial medical care did not survive.ConclusionPediatric fire casualties were initially managed by prehospital medical teams that were not specialized in pediatrics. As in adults, the main injuries were secondary to smoke inhalation, but this has increased toxicity in children. Prehospital teams not specialized in pediatrics can optimize their practice via the sharing of experiences, team training, and cognitive aid checklist for pediatric fire victims.     

The Impact of Provider Education on Pediatric Palliative Care Referral

IntroductionPalliative care can significantly benefit children managing a life-limiting illness; unfortunately, services are still generally reserved for end of life. The aim of this project was to demonstrate how established guidelines and provider education could impact referrals.MethodsEducational sessions outlining national referral recommendations were offered to providers in the neonatal intensive care unit, pediatric intensive care unit, and Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders at a tertiary care facility. Presurveys and postsurveys were administered at the time of the intervention, and referral rates for the organization were collected for 2 months before and 2 months after the intervention.ResultsWhile there was a clinically significant increase in hospital-wide referral rates, most important was the statistically significant (p < .1) increase in provider comfortability with established guidelines.DiscussionPalliative care is essential for optimizing quality of life. Provider knowledge of referral criteria ensures that patients receive this service early in their disease trajectory and can benefit from its inclusion within their care team.     

Management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A continuing dilemma for physicians and educators

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has recommended that the initial treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) should be educational and behavioral. The authors surveyed the directors of special education in the United States to determine whether these services are available to children with ADHD. They determined that the diagnosis of ADHD qualifies a child for services in only 1 out of 51 departments of special education surveyed. ADHD and classroom underachievement qualifies a child for special education services in 2 out of 51 departments. Thus, in most areas of the United States, special educational services are not available to meet the guidelines of the AAP.     

International child health electives for pediatric residents

BACKGROUND: International child health (ICH) electives can strengthen the skills and shape the values of pediatric residents. Much can be learned from the literature on ICH electives during medical school. Yet there is little published information regarding ICH electives during residency, nor do educational guidelines for such electives exist. OBJECTIVES: To describe existing ICH electives among pediatric residency programs and to develop guidelines for ICH electives during residency training. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A survey of 248 pediatric residency programs in the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico was conducted in November 1995. Consensus guidelines were developed by the executive committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Section on International Child Health. Consensus was achieved via full agreement among the 11 committee members. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 65%. International child health electives were offered by 25% of respondents. Most had no formal educational structure. An additional 42% of respondents indicated interest in ICH electives and requested more information. The AAP consensus guidelines for ICH electives focus on 4 principles: prerequisites, preceptorship, preparation, and evaluation. The guidelines are based on a conceptual framework that emphasizes reciprocity and continuity. CONCLUSIONS: While only 25% of pediatric residency programs currently offer ICH electives, many more express an interest in doing so. Educational structure for such electives is important and lacking. The AAP consensus guidelines provide a template for meaningful ICH experiences during pediatric residency. These guidelines may be applicable to other specialties as well.     

Pediatric transport team: Intermountain Life Flight

The transport of the pediatric patient presents unique challenges. To assure the children receive the care they need during transport, the appropriate specialty team should be used. This article presents the role of a pediatric specialty team in patient transport and offers an example of a long-standing pediatric transport team.     

Pediatric interhospital critical care transport: consensus of a national leadership conference

As pediatric interhospital critical care transport has evolved toward a distinct discipline, practitioners in this field have recognized the need for guidelines for transport program development and patient care. At a gathering of medical directors of pediatric transport programs, the following topics were discussed: team composition and transport staffing, training requirements for pediatric and nonpediatric transport teams, goals and design of a transport data base, and medical-legal issues, including the responsibilities of the referring and receiving institutions. Consensus recommendations were made for the major issues in each of these areas. Several questions were raised which may be answered by multiinstitutional studies.     

Adherence to AAP practice guidelines for urinary tract infections at our teaching institution

Urinary tract infection (UTI) in children is a common diagnosis in general pediatric practice. Because of the potential severity and proven morbidity of such infections, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) developed guidelines to better direct clinicians in the workup. This retrospective study sought to evaluate the uniformity of adherence to these guidelines at our teaching institution. A total of 104 charts were reviewed, and data were collected based on the parameters outlined by the AAP. It is found that at the authors' teaching institution, there is at least 70% adherence to the recommendations for method of urine collection and 97% adherence to performance of urinalysis. However, imaging workup, which may be the most important follow-up of a first-time UTI, has only a 61% adherence rate.     

USPSTF Perspective on Evidence-Based Preventive Recommendations for Children

The development and use of evidence-based recommendations for preventive care by primary care providers caring for children is an ongoing challenge. This issue is further complicated by the fact that a higher proportion of recommendations by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) for pediatric preventive services in comparison with adult services have insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the service. One important root cause for this problem is the relative lack of high quality screening and counseling studies in pediatric primary care settings. The paucity of studies limits the development of additional evidence-based guidelines to enhance best practices for pediatric and adolescent conditions. In this article, we describe the following: (1) evidence-based primary care preventive services as a strategy for addressing important pediatric morbidities, (2) the process of making evidence-based screening recommendations by the USPSTF, (3) the current library of USPSTF recommendations for children and adolescents, and (4) factors influencing the use of USPSTF recommendations and other evidence-based guidelines by clinicians. Strategies to accelerate the implementation of evidence-based services and areas of need for future research to fill key gaps in evidence-based recommendations and guidelines are highlighted.     

Conscious sedation of the pediatric patient for suturing: a survey

No single drug or combination of drugs was used routinely in pediatric emergency departments to sedate children for suturing. A meperidine-promethazine-chlorpromazine "cocktail" was chosen most frequently. Many physicians were dissatisfied with the method they selected, however, leading some to experiment with newer medications such as fentanyl. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines for the elective use of conscious sedation, specifically, those regarding monitoring during sedation and discharge post sedation, were not adhered to uniformly. Further study of conscious sedation in children is needed.     

Pediatric home health care in King County, Washington

BACKGROUND: Pediatric home health care is one of the fastest growing segments of our health care system. However, our knowledge of the extent and quality of the services provided in this field is generally limited. Despite this shortcoming, pediatric health care providers are increasingly expected to participate in the home health care of their patients. OBJECTIVE: To describe the agencies and services that constitute pediatric home health care in a large metropolitan setting. METHODS: During the summer of 1995, home health care agencies in King County, WA, were surveyed if they had provided any pediatric services within the preceding 6 months. The agencies were queried about their characteristics and services provided, as well as referral and reimbursement sources. Survey data were supplemented by interviews with agency and state health personnel. RESULTS: Fourteen (88%) of the 16 agencies providing pediatric home health care services completed the survey. Agencies were predominantly for-profit, free-standing, and in business fewer than 10 years. Although there were uniform licensing requirements for agencies, no pediatric-specific regulations existed. In addition, many agencies lacked internal methods to ensure the provision of quality pediatric care. Eighty percent of all pediatric home health care services were provided by only 5 agencies. For intermittent (acute) services, agencies served approximately 450 children per month. The average number of visits per child was two, with 40% receiving only one visit. Services included skilled nursing (60%), infusion (27%), and respiratory therapy (9%). Maintenance (chronic) home health care services, for 156 chronically ill children, were provided almost exclusively by skilled nursing for an average of 9 hours per patient per day. The majority of referrals to agencies (75%) originated from health care providers, although a small number came from insurance companies or individual families. Reimbursement for intermittent care services was divided among commercial insurance (35%), captitated contracts (35%), and Medicaid (20%). In contrast, 90% of reimbursement for the chronically ill was from Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: In King County, WA, pediatric home health care is predominantly an unregulated, for-profit industry, with most agencies having little actual experience in pediatric home health care. In addition, the unique features of pediatric home health care necessitate both a greater understanding of this field and the consideration of more specific guidelines.     

TV guides: exposure of hospitalized children to inappropriate programming.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the policy recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) regarding television viewing are heeded in an inpatient pediatric setting. SETTING: An inner-city academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 199 pediatric inpatients. METHODS: An investigator visited all pediatric inpatient rooms. Observations were made when the patient was present in the room, alert, and awake. The main outcome measure was exposure to inappropriate programming. In accordance with AAP guidelines, we used the established television rating system to code programs as appropriate versus inappropriate for children. We classified G- and PG-rated shows that centered on adult themes or that were not informational, educational, and nonviolent as inappropriate. We tested parental demographics, age of child, time of day, and presence of an adult in the room as possible predictors. RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of the patients had the television turned on. Of these, 53% were tuned to inappropriate programming. Exposure to inappropriate programming did not differ by parental ethnicity, language, or education. Exposure was highest for infants and toddlers as compared with children or adolescents (74% vs 40% vs 52%, P =.001); it did not vary by time of day. Exposure was higher when an adult was present in the room (58% vs 42%, P =.05); this effect was most pronounced for adolescents (68% vs 41%, P =.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite AAP recommendations, hospitalized children are exposed to inappropriate programming, especially when parents are present in the room. Hospital stays may be a unique opportunity to educate parents about the AAP recommendations for television viewing by children.     

Financing of pediatric home health care. Committee on Child Health Financing, Section on Home Care, American Academy of Pediatrics

In certain situations, home health care has been shown to be a cost-effective alternative to inpatient hospital care. National health expenditures reveal that pediatric home health costs totaled $5.3 billion in 2000. Medicaid is the major payer for pediatric home health care (77%), followed by other public sources (22%). Private health insurance and families each paid less than 1% of pediatric home health expenses. The most important factors affecting access to home health care are the inadequate supply of clinicians and ancillary personnel, shortages of home health nurses with pediatric expertise, inadequate payment, and restrictive insurance and managed care policies. Many children must stay in the NICU, PICU, and other pediatric wards and intermediate care areas at a much higher cost because of inadequate pediatric home health care services. The main financing problem pertaining to Medicaid is low payment to home health agencies at rates that are insufficient to provide beneficiaries access to home health services. Although home care services may be a covered benefit under private health plans, most do not cover private-duty nursing (83%), home health aides (45%), or home physical, occupational, or speech therapy (33%) and/or impose visit or monetary limits or caps. To advocate for improvements in financing of pediatric home health care, the American Academy of Pediatrics has developed several recommendations for public policy makers, federal and state Medicaid offices, private insurers, managed care plans, Title V officials, and home health care professionals. These recommendations will improve licensing, payment, coverage, and research related to pediatric home health services.     

Obesity Applications in Smartphones: Development and Use of an Evaluation Tool

IntroductionRates of obesity amongst children and teens in the United States have tripled since the 1970s, and 18.5% are now considered obese. With smartphone use among children and teens becoming the norm, smartphone applications may be a cost-effective solution to support patients and families motivated to change lifestyle behaviors and reduce obesity. The purpose of this quality-improvement project was (1) to develop an app evaluation tool and star rating system based on scientific evidence and current clinical practice guidelines in managing childhood obesity, and (2) to determine whether an in-service training can increase provider knowledge and efficacy in the use of smartphone apps in managing childhood obesity.MethodsAn app evaluation tool (Ped-WHAT) was developed that includes evidence-based behavior modification strategies (BMS) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines for healthy weight management in pediatrics. Apps were given a rating based on the number of these criteria included in the app. An educational in-service training was developed to assist health care providers in using the app evaluation tool with patients. This training was tested with providers working in a pediatric weight management clinic. Pre- and post-training surveys were administered. Results were analyzed using t tests to assess differences.ResultsSixteen commercially available apps were evaluated using the Ped-WHAT tool. Those that included the greatest number of BMS and AAP criteria received the highest rating on a 0-5 scale. Statistically significant improvements in provider knowledge and confidence were found after the in-service training.DiscussionIn this current digital environment, commercially available weight management apps should undergo evaluation by health care providers to ensure that they follow the standard of care and current practice guidelines/recommendations.     

Early childhood adversity, toxic stress, and the role of the pediatrician: translating developmental science into lifelong health

Advances in a wide range of biological, behavioral, and social sciences are expanding our understanding of how early environmental influences (the ecology) and genetic predispositions (the biologic program) affect learning capacities, adaptive behaviors, lifelong physical and mental health, and adult productivity. A supporting technical report from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) presents an integrated ecobiodevelopmental framework to assist in translating these dramatic advances in developmental science into improved health across the life span. Pediatricians are now armed with new information about the adverse effects of toxic stress on brain development, as well as a deeper understanding of the early life origins of many adult diseases. As trusted authorities in child health and development, pediatric providers must now complement the early identification of developmental concerns with a greater focus on those interventions and community investments that reduce external threats to healthy brain growth. To this end, AAP endorses a developing leadership role for the entire pediatric community-one that mobilizes the scientific expertise of both basic and clinical researchers, the family-centered care of the pediatric medical home, and the public influence of AAP and its state chapters-to catalyze fundamental change in early childhood policy and services. AAP is committed to leveraging science to inform the development of innovative strategies to reduce the precipitants of toxic stress in young children and to mitigate their negative effects on the course of development and health across the life span.