Disintegration of pancreatic duct stones with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy]

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Treatment of pancreatic duct stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) serves as a nonsurgical treatment modality in patients with stones that are located in upstream of the strictures or in patients with impacted stones. We present the results of ESWL in endoscopically unretrievable pancreatic duct stones in the past 2 years. METHODS: Between January 2002 and December 2003, 58 patients with chronic pancreatitis were treated by ESWL for pancreatic duct stones. ESWL was performed with an electrohydraulic lithotripter ultrasound focusing system. RESULTS: The mean number of shockwave treatments was 2.5, and the patients received 4,578 (1,527-10,155) shockwave discharges with a mean energy of 15.8 kV. Fragmentations of the stones were achieved in 54 patients (93.2%), and complete clearance of the stones were noticed in 27 patients (46.6%). Fragmentation of stones equal or less than 3 mm in diameter was associated with successful removal of stones (p<0.05). Complete relief of pain occurred in 32 patients (55.2%). The procedures were well tolerated and no patient had significant complications such as acute pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: ESWL is an effective and a safe procedure for endoscopically unretrievable main pancreatic duct stones. ESWL combined with endoscopic therapy can increase the success rate of nonsurgical removal of pancreatic duct stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis.     

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of gallstones in cystic duct remnants and Mirizzi syndrome

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of bile duct calculi is established, there are few studies of the value of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct remnant stones and for Mirizzi syndrome. METHODS: Patients who required extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct stones were identified in a cohort of 239 patients with bile duct stones treated by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy between January 1989 and December 2001 at a single institution. The medical records of these patients were reviewed. Follow-up information was obtained by telephone contact. OBSERVATIONS: Six women (age range 19-85 years) underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystic duct stones after failure of endoscopic treatment measures. Three of the patients presented with retained cystic duct remnant calculi (one also had Mirizzi syndrome type I), and 3 presented with Mirizzi syndrome type I. The stones were fragmented successfully by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in all patients; the fragments were extracted endoscopically in 5 patients. Endoscopy plus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy was definitive treatment for all patients except one who subsequently underwent cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Gallstones in a cystic duct remnant and in Mirizzi syndrome can be successfully treated by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in conjunction with endoscopic measures. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy is especially useful when surgery is contraindicated.     

The endoscopic approach to pancreatic duct stones

Pancreatic duct stones may complicate the course of chronic pancreatitis and be responsible for recurrent episodes of pancreatitis and/or exacerbations of abdominal pain. Endoscopic management of pancreatic duct stones with or without extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a relatively safe and effective method to treat main pancreatic duct stones in symptomatic patients. Selection of candidates most likely to respond to endoscopic therapy needs further evaluation. Studies comparing medical, surgical, and endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct stones are still awaited.     

Sonographically-guided extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for pancreatic stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis

Over a 2 year period, 10 patients with pancreatic stones due to alcohol induced chronic pancreatitis (proven by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography) underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Prior to shockwave therapy, all patients underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy. Targeting of shockwave lithotripsy was exclusively performed under sonographic control. All patients were treated with a second generation electrohydraulic spark gap lithotriptor and fragmentation of concrements could be achieved in all cases. Complete duct clearance was confirmed in seven patients by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in one session, with endoscopic fragment extraction by basket and/or balloon catheter. In three patients, balloon dilation of concomitant strictures located in the head of the pancreas was performed prior to fragment extraction. All stone-free patients showed no further symptoms over the follow-up period of 12 months. Three patients in whom complete extraction of fragments was not successful experienced minor symptoms over the 12 month follow-up period.     

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of pancreatic duct stones

The purpose of endoscopic therapy in chronic pancreatitis is to decompress the main pancreatic duct and to remove the obstacles that impede the ductal flow of pancreatic juice. The availability of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has improved the results of endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct and has also expanded the indications of endoscopic therapy for chronic pancreatitis. This article briefly reviews ESWL for pancreatic duct stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis, including our experience with ESWL. ESWL is an effective and safe procedure for endoscopically unremovable main pancreatic duct stones, and, in selected patients, ESWL alone may be effective.     

Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct stones using a 10F pancreatoscope and electrohydraulic lithotripsy

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic therapy with adjunctive extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy fails to provide clearance of pancreatic duct stones in up to 25% of symptomatic patients. Direct contact lithotripsy may provide an additional option for removal of refractory stones. We report our initial experience using a prototype 10F "baby" endoscope to administer electrohydraulic lithotripsy. METHODS: Five patients failing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and one patient with recurrent pancreatic duct stones after surgery were selected to undergo endoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy. After pancreatic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation (8 or 10 mm), the 10F endoscope was introduced and electrohydraulic lithotripsy was used to fragment stones under direct visualization. RESULTS: Six patients underwent 9 intraductal electrohydraulic lithotripsy procedures. Complete or partial pancreatic duct clearance was accomplished in all but one. No complications from the lithotripsy procedure were noted. The 5 patients with partial or complete duct clearance experienced complete relief of abdominal pain of at least 6 months' duration following their final procedure. CONCLUSION: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy within the pancreatic duct provides an adjunctive endoscopic option for treatment of patients with symptomatic pancreatic duct stones. Our initial experience suggests that electrohydraulic lithotripsy therapy can successfully fragment stones refractory to conventional endoscopic stone extraction methods or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Further experience is necessary to establish the risks of electrohydraulic lithotripsy within the pancreatic duct.     

The role of endoscopy in the therapy of chronic pancreatitis

Almost all the therapeutic efforts in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis are directed towards pain control. Endoscopic techniques available for this purpose are endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (combined or not with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy) and endoscopic ultrasound. Pancreatic stones and strictures, pancreatic pseudocysts, and common bile duct strictures complicating chronic pancreatitis can be treated by endoscopy. The development of endoscopic ultrasound extended the possibilities in the treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts and main pancreatic duct drainage. Endoscopy is considered the first-line treatment in chronic pancreatitis and can be useful also as a 'bridge to surgery'. In fact the endoscopic approach to chronic pancreatitis can predict the response to surgical therapy as a definitive treatment. Medical, endoscopic and surgical methods for the management of chronic pancreatitis should all be considered in decision-making, and the best treatment should be chosen case by case and according to the local expertise.     

Clinical outcomes in patients who undergo extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for chronic calcific pancreatitis

BACKGROUND: There is controversy as to whether extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy fragmentation and ERCP retrieval of pancreatic stones are associated with relief of chronic pain or relapsing attacks of pancreatitis. Our most recent experience with this technology is reviewed. METHODS: Forty patients with chronic calcific pancreatitis who required extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy between 1995 and 2000 to facilitate pancreatic duct stone removal were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included patient presentation, number of lithotripsy and ERCP sessions required, complications, and outcomes measures to include pre- and post-ESWL pain scale, monthly oxycodone (5 mg)-equivalent pills ingested, yearly hospitalizations, and need for subsequent surgery. RESULTS: A single extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy session was required for 35 patients who underwent a total of 86 ERCPs to achieve complete stone extraction from the main pancreatic duct. Minor complications occurred in 20%. There was one episode of pancreatic sepsis that was treated with antibiotics and removal of an occluded pancreatic prosthesis. At a mean [SD] follow-up of 2.4 (0.6) years, 80% of patients had avoided surgery and there was a statistically significant decrease in pain scores (6.9 [1.3] vs. 2.9 [1.1]; p = 0.001), yearly hospitalizations for pancreatitis (3.9 [1.9] vs. 0.9 [0.9]; p = 0.001), and oxycodone-equivalent narcotic medication ingested monthly (125 [83] vs. 81 [80]; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy fragmentation of pancreatic duct calculi in conjunction with endoscopic clearance of the main pancreatic duct is associated with significant improvement in clinical outcomes in most patients with chronic pancreatitis.     

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of pancreatic stones.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of pancreatic stones was performed in eight patients with chronic pancreatitis and a dilated duct system harbouring stones 5 to 20 mm (means 10 (SD) 5 mm) in diameter. After endoscopic sphincterotomy of the pancreatic orifice the stones were disintegrated by shock waves under fluoroscopic control using a kidney lithotripter (Dornier HM3). The procedure was well tolerated by all but one patient, who had a mild pancreatitic attack immediately after lithotripsy. Clearance of the pancreatic duct systems from the larger stones was achieved in seven of eight patients. Half of the patients showed no improvement in the intensity and frequency of pain. The other patients had a marked amelioration of symptoms, however, both immediately and during a mean follow up interval of 11 (eight) months. A selective combined approach by endoscopy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of pancreatic stones seems promising.     

Motion--pancreatic endoscopy is useful for the pain of chronic pancreatitis: arguments for the motion.

Pain is the dominant clinical problem in patients with chronic pancreatitis. It can be due to pseudocysts, as well as strictures and stones in the pancreatic ducts. Most experts agree that obstruction could cause increased pressure within the main pancreatic duct or its branches, resulting in pain. Endoscopic therapy aims to alleviate pain by reducing the pressure within the ductal system and draining pseudocysts. Approaches vary according to the specific nature of the problem, and include transgastric, transduodenal and transpapillary stenting and drainage. Additional techniques for the removal of stones from the pancreatic duct include extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Success rates for stone extraction and stenting of strictures are high in specialized centres that employ experienced endoscopists, but pain often recurs during long term follow-up. Complications include pancreatitis, bleeding, infection and perforation. In the case of pancreatic pseudocysts, percutaneous or even surgical drainage should be considered if septae or large amounts of debris are present within the lesion. This article describes the techniques, indications and results of endoscopic therapy of pancreatic lesions.     

Per-oral pancreatoscopy-guided lithotripsy vs. extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treating refractory main pancreatic duct stones in chronic pancreatitis: Protocol for an open-label multi-center randomized clinical trial

Backgrounds/ObjectivesPatients with chronic pancreatitis may develop pancreatic duct stones that can obstruct outflow leading to ductal hypertension and pain. Both endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) with per-oral pancreatoscopy (POP) and intraductal lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) are feasible options to attempt ductal stone clearance. This study aims to compare POP-guided lithotripsy with ESWL in the management of refractory symptomatic main pancreatic duct stones.MethodsThis is an open-label, multi-center, parallel, randomized clinical trial. Patients with chronic pancreatitis and main pancreatic duct stones ≥5 mm who fail standard ERP methods for stone removal will be eligible for this study. In total, 150 subjects will be randomized 1:1 to either ESWL or POP. A maximum of 4 sessions of either ESWL or POP will be allowed in each arm, with crossover permitted thereafter. The primary outcome is complete stone clearance and secondary outcomes include quality of life, pain scores, number of interventions, and daily opiate requirements.ConclusionsThis study aims to answer the question of which lithotripsy method is superior in removing refractory pancreatic duct stones while addressing the effects of lithotripsy on quality of life and pain in patients with chronic calcific pancreatitis (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04115826).     

Long term follow up of patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic stones treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

BACKGROUND: There have been conflicting reports as to whether pancreatic ductal drainage achieved by endoscopy and lithotripsy improves the clinical outcome of patients with chronic pancreatitis. AIMS: To determine the clinical outcome in patients with chronic pancreatitis who received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), and were followed up for two to eight years. METHODS: Eighty patients with severe chronic pancreatitis and endoscopically unretrievable obstructive stones underwent ESWL with a piezoelectric lithotripter between 1989 and 1996. Clinical status, relief of symptoms, further endoscopic or surgical interventions, and mortality were defined. RESULTS: Forty three (54%) patients were treated successfully with ESWL. The only feature associated with treatment success was the presence of a single stone rather than multiple stones. Successfully treated patients tended to experience less pain, although this did not reach statistical significance. A slight increase in weight was noted in our patients; however, there was no notable improvement in anomalous stools and diabetes mellitus. Five patients died due to extrapancreatic reasons. No pancreatic carcinomas developed. CONCLUSIONS: ESWL associated with endoscopic drainage is a safe technique that is particularly successful in patients with a single stone. However, pancreatic drainage by endoscopy and ESWL has almost no effect on pain in chronic pancreatitis. Furthermore, endoscopic management and ESWL does not prevent or postpone the development of glandular insufficiency.     

Role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of pancreatic stones

Calcifications in chronic pancreatitis are usually the result of chronic inflammation or altered metabolism. Calcifications can perpetuate the cycle of ductal obstruction and contribute to pain, worsening of pancreatic inflammation, ductal disruption, and deterioration of the exocrine and endocrine function of the gland. Removal of pancreatic duct calculi can reduce pain and improve glandular function. Purely endoscopic stone removal has limited success, because of stone location, burden, and presence of strictures in the pancreatic duct. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) allows fragmentation of stones refractory to endoscopic methods and facilitates spontaneous stone passage or endoscopic removal. Among the various forms of lithotripters, none is clearly superior to the others. Current data suggest that ESWL is effective in complete duct clearance in up to 50% of patients and in duct decompression and symptomatic improvement in up to 70% of patients. ESWL should be considered as a useful adjunctive tool in the treatment of pancreatic duct calculi.     

Pancreatic stones: treat or ignore?

Painful, chronic pancreatitis is of complex etiology, but increasing clinical experience suggests that removal of pancreatic duct stones in many cases significantly improves patients' symptoms. The development and refinement of therapeutic endoscopic retrograde choledochopancreatography have permitted improved access to the pancreatic duct, which makes the development of new techniques of stone fragmentation and fragment removal a much more successful nonsurgical intervention. A major step forward has been the understanding of the safety and efficacy of pancreatic sphincterotomy, which is necessary for the removal of these difficult stones. The recognition that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy can be delivered safely with good efficacy has revolutionized the nonsurgical management of pancreatic duct stones. Nevertheless, advanced and sophisticated therapeutic endoscopy is necessary to achieve clearance of the duct, which can generally be accomplished in the majority of selected patients. State-of-the-art treatments are described, and some new approaches using pancreatoscopy and electrohydrolic lithotripsy are discussed. Newly recognized long term complications are reviewed. Finally, it must be recognized that chronic pancreatitis is an ongoing disease that does not have a simple treatment or cure, and frequently represents a process of remissions and relapses requiring interventions and problem solving.     

Endoscopic pancreatic sphincter balloon dilation for effective retrieval of pancreatic duct stone

To facilitate pancreatic stone retrieval, four patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic stones underwent endoscopic pancreatic sphincter balloon dilation (EPSBD) rather than pancreatic sphincterotomy. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy combined with endoscopic removal was carried out in three patients. Stone removal following EPSBD was completely successful in all four patients. Patients showed no severe complications during the dilation procedure. In one patient, to prevent pancreatitis, an endoscopic nasopancreatic drain was placed for 1 week after EPSBD. Compared with pancreatic sphincterotomy, EPSBD can be performed safely in patients with chronic pancreatitis to assist in the extraction of pancreatic duct stones. Use of the EPSBD procedure in cases of chronic pancreatitis provides a useful approach to improve endoscopic clearance of pancreatic duct stones.     

Update on endoscopic management of main pancreatic duct stones in chronic calcific pancreatitis

Pancreatic duct stones are a common complication during the natural course of chronic pancreatitis and often contribute to additional pain and pancreatitis. Abdominal pain, one of the major symptoms of chronic pancreatitis, is believed to be caused in part by obstruction of the pancreatic duct system (by stones or strictures) resulting in increasing intraductal pressure and parenchymal ischemia. Pancreatic stones can be managed by surgery, endoscopy, or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. In this review, updated management of pancreatic duct stones is discussed.     

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for clearance of bile duct stones resistant to endoscopic extraction

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones after sphincterotomy has a success rate of up to 95%. Failures occur in patients with extremely large stones, intrahepatic stones, and bile duct strictures. This study examined the efficacy and the safety of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in a large cohort of patients in whom routine endoscopic measures including mechanical lithotripsy had failed to extract bile duct stones. METHODS: Out of 1587 consecutive patients, endoscopic stone extraction including mechanical lithotripsy was unsuccessful in 313 (20%). These 313 patients (64% women, median age, 73 years) underwent high-energy extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. Stone targeting was performed fluoroscopically (99%) or by ultrasonography (1%). RESULTS: Complete clearance of bile duct calculi was achieved in 281 (90%) patients. In 80% of the patients, the fragments were extracted endoscopically after shock-wave therapy; spontaneous passage was observed in 10%. For patients with complete clearance compared with those without there were no differences with regard to size or number of the stones, intrahepatic or extrahepatic stone location, presence or absence of bile duct strictures, or type of lithotripter. Cholangitis (n = 4) and acute cholecystitis (n = 1) were the rare adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with bile duct calculi that are difficult to extract endoscopically, high-energy extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy is a safe and effective therapy regardless of stone size, stone location, or the presence of bile duct stricture.     

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of pancreatic duct stones.

Encouraging results with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for pancreatic duct stones have been reported from Europe. We present our experience with the first two North American patients, treated with excellent results in one and limited clinical improvement in the other patient at 1 year follow-up. Targeting of pancreatic duct stones was achieved with either fluoroscopy or ultrasound.     

Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis

Background: The aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term results of endoscopic pancreatic stone removal in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Methods: We retrospectively included 53 patients with chronic pancreatitis, in whom an attempt was made at endoscopic stone removal between 1984 and 1993. Patients presented with pain (30) or an exacerbation of pancreatitis (23). A sphincterotomy was performed in 41 patients. A nasopancreatic drain was left in situ for saline flushing in 6 patients. A pancreatic stent was inserted beyond the stones in 28 patients. Fragmentation of stones was performed by mechanical lithotripsy in 4 patients or by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 8 patients. Results: All patients had pancreatic stones (multiple 33, single 20) with proximal dilatation of the pancreatic duct. Median follow-up was 33 months (range 4 to 131). Stone removal was successful in 42 patients (79%) (complete 39, partial 3) with relief of symptoms in 38 of 42 (90%). The remaining 4 patients had pancreatic surgery. Stone removal failed in 11 patients and 3 of 11 patients had symptomatic improvement. The remaining 8 patients needed either pancreatic surgery (4) or continued conservative treatment (4). Thirteen of the 53 patients (25%) had recurrent stones, which could be removed endoscopically in 10 of 13. Procedure-related complications occurred in 5 of 53 patients (9%). Mortality was 0%. Seven of the 28 stented patients (25%) had stent-related complications. Conclusions: Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic stones is a valid approach in patients with pancreatic lithiasis with an acceptable risk profile. (Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:556-60.)     

Endoscopic Approach to Pancreatic Duct Calculi and Obstructive Pancreatitis

Twelve patients with chronic pancreatitis and obstructing pancreatic calculi underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and attempted pancreatic stone extraction. This procedure, utilizing conventional stone baskets and balloons, as well as extracorporeal or laser lithotripsy in a subset, was ultimately successful in 11 of 12 patients. Nine of the 10 patients with relapsing pancreatitis have not had a symptomatic flare at a mean follow-up of 17 months. In contrast, neither of the patients who presented with chronic pain had convincing symptomatic improvement. The authors conclude that endoscopic removal of pancreatic duct calculi deserves further investigation in the treatment of relapsing attacks of chronic pancreatitis.