Chest trauma

Chest trauma is a frequent problem arising from lesions caused by domestic and occupational activities and especially road traffic accidents. These injuries can be analyzed from distinct points of view, ranging from consideration of the most severe injuries, especially in the context of multiple trauma, to the specific characteristics of blunt and open trauma. In the present article, these injuries are discussed according to the involvement of the various thoracic structures. Rib fractures are the most frequent chest injuries and their diagnosis and treatment is straightforward, although these injuries can be severe if more than three ribs are affected and when there is major associated morbidity. Lung contusion is the most common visceral lesion. These injuries are usually found in severe chest trauma and are often associated with other thoracic and intrathoracic lesions. Treatment is based on general support measures. Pleural complications, such as hemothorax and pneumothorax, are also frequent. Their diagnosis is also straightforward and treatment is based on pleural drainage. This article also analyzes other complex situations, notably airway trauma, which is usually very severe in blunt chest trauma and less severe and even suitable for conservative treatment in iatrogenic injury due to tracheal intubation. Rupture of the diaphragm usually causes a diaphragmatic hernia. Treatment is always surgical. Myocardial contusions should be suspected in anterior chest trauma and in sternal fractures. Treatment is conservative. Other chest injuries, such as those of the great thoracic and esophageal vessels, are less frequent but are especially severe.     

Chest wall trauma

Sufficient trauma to the chest can result in injury to the bony thorax and soft tissues of the chest wall, increasing patient morbidity and mortality. Fractured ribs can lacerate the pleura, lung, or abdominal organs. Fractures to upper ribs, clavicle, and upper sternum can signal brachial plexus or vascular injury. Paradoxical movement of a flail chest can impair respiratory mechanics, promote atelectasis, and impair pulmonary drainage. Most patients with thoracic spine fracture-dislocations have complete neurologic deficits. Scapular fractures, associated with other injuries in almost all patients, are frequently overlooked on supine chest radiographs. Sternal fractures, associated with clinically silent myocardial contusion, are best visualized on chest computed tomography (CT). Severe trauma to the chest wall can be associated with large chest wall hematomas or collections of air within the chest wall that can communicate with the intrathoracic space. CT scanning can easily distinguish chest wall from parenchymal or mediastinal injury, whereas this differentiation my not be possible with chest radiography.     

Nonaortic mediastinal injuries from blunt chest trauma

In addition to traumatic aortic injuries (TAI), blunt chest trauma may damage other structures in the mediastinum, including the tracheobronchial tree, the heart and pericardium, and rarely the esophagus. Tracheobronchial injuries may be difficult to separate radiographically from accompanying parenchymal lung injuries. Experience with diagnosis by computed tomography (CT) is still limited. Cardiac injuries often require emergent surgery before extensive imaging can be done. Some patients, usually those with chamber ruptures of the right heart, survive long enough to receive a chest CT, at which time hemopericardium can be detected. Upper esophageal injuries may occur in conjunction with lower cervical or upper thoracic spine injures. Distal esophageal injuries are rarely caused by blunt trauma.     

A clinical decision rule for identifying children with thoracic injuries after blunt torso trauma

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the prevalence of thoracic injuries in children sustaining blunt torso trauma and to develop a clinical prediction rule to identify children with these injuries. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled pediatric patients (<16 years) who presented to the emergency department of a Level I trauma center with blunt torso trauma and underwent chest radiography. Clinical findings were recorded in a standardized fashion by the ED faculty physician. Thoracic injuries included the following: pulmonary contusion, hemothorax, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, tracheal-bronchial disruption, aortic injury, hemopericardium, pneumopericardium, cardiac contusion, rib fracture, sternal fracture, or any injury to the diaphragm. Multiple logistic regression and recursive partitioning analyses were performed to generate a clinical prediction rule for identifying children with these injuries. RESULTS: Nine hundred eighty-six patients with a mean age of 8.3+/-4.8 years were enrolled. Eighty (8.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5% to 10.0%) patients sustained thoracic injuries. Multiple logistic regression and recursive partitioning analyses identified the following predictors of thoracic injuries: low systolic blood pressure (14% with injury versus 2% without injury; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.6), elevated age-adjusted respiratory rate (51% versus 16%; adjusted OR 2.9), abnormal results on examination of the thorax (68% versus 36%; adjusted OR 3.6), abnormal chest auscultation findings (14% versus 1%; adjusted OR 8.6), femur fracture (13% versus 5%; adjusted OR 2.2), and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of less than 15 (61% versus 26%; adjusted OR 3.3). Seventy-eight (98%; 95% CI 91% to 100%) of the 80 patients with thoracic injuries had at least 1 of these predictive factors. Three hundred thirty-six (37%) children had none of these predictive factors, including 2 (0.6%; 95% CI 0.1% to 2.1%) with thoracic injuries. These 2 injuries, however, did not require any intervention. CONCLUSION: Predictors of thoracic injury in children sustaining blunt torso trauma include low systolic blood pressure, elevated respiratory rate, abnormal results on thoracic examination, abnormal chest auscultation findings, femur fracture, and a GCS score of less than 15. These predictors can be used to create a sensible clinical decision rule for the identification of children with thoracic injuries.     

Radiographic and CT findings in blunt chest trauma

Injuries of the thorax are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in blunt trauma patients. Radiologic imaging plays an important role in the workup of the patient with thoracic trauma. The chest radiograph is the initial imaging study obtained, but computed tomography (CT) is now used frequently in the evaluation of chest trauma. The primary role of chest CT has been to assess for aortic injuries, but CT has been shown to be useful for the evaluation of pulmonary, airway, skeletal, and diaphragmatic injuries as well. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a limited role in the initial evaluation of the trauma patient, but may be of use for the evaluation of the spine and diaphragm in patients who are hemodynamically stable.     

Imaging of blunt aortic and great vessel trauma

The thoracic aorta and great vessels are at risk of injury by both blunt and penetrating trauma. High-speed deceleration injury, predominately caused by motor vehicle accidents, is the primary cause of blunt traumatic aortic injury (TAI). Though largely fatal if untreated, these injuries are amenable to surgical repair if appropriately diagnosed. Algorithms for both diagnosis and treatment of TAI have undergone changes in recent years. Radiologic imaging plays a key role in the evaluation of TAI, and this review focuses on the relative roles of chest radiography, computed tomography (CT) (particularly helical CT), and aortography in the diagnostic algorithm for TAI. Other aortic imaging methods have been used in the setting of TAI, such as transesophageal echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and intravascular ultrasound; although these techniques may play a complementary role in TAI evaluation, they are unlikely to have as significant an impact on routine radiologic practice as will CT.     

Aortoiliac occlusion secondary to atherosclerotic plaque rupture as the result of blunt trauma

Abdominal aortic injuries secondary to blunt trauma are uncommon, particularly without associated visceral injury or external signs of localized trauma. Blunt trauma-induced abdominal aortic injuries most frequently result in intimal tearing. The most common mechanism is localized impact over the lower abdomen from sudden deceleration against a fixed object. We present the case of a patient with atheromatous plaque rupture in the distal abdominal aorta associated with acute aortoiliac occlusion as the result of a fall. Atherosclerotic disease may be present in young asymptomatic individuals and may be a predisposing factor for aortic intimal tearing. A high degree of suspicion and periodic reassessment of peripheral circulation in trauma patients are required to ensure early diagnosis of this injury.     

Endovascular stent - graft treatment for blunt aortic injury.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic aortic injury resulting from blunt trauma is usually fatal and almost always associated with multiple, complex, nonaortic injuries that can adversely affect standard surgical repair of the aorta. Endovascular stent - graft treatment offers these patients a less invasive operative treatment option. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 2002 and October 2003, 6 patients with blunt aortic injury (BAI) were treated with a stent - graft. In all cases endovascular management was selected because of associated polytrauma or comorbidities. All stent - grafts were homemade and deployed through the femoral artery with 18-20 Fr delivery sheaths. There were no cases of perioperative death, renal failure, or neurologic complication. In one patient the postoperative computed tomography scan showed proximal endoleak requiring additional balloon dilatation and stenting. No other endoleaks were observed by CT in the acute phase. None of the follow-up CT scans revealed evidence of endoleak, migration, or alteration of the stent - graft. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair for BAI is technically feasible and is an alternative to open surgery for high-risk patients.     

钝性外伤性主动脉损伤的诊断及治疗策略的选择

目的 探讨钝性外伤性主动脉损伤的诊断、手术治疗时机和治疗策略的选择。 方法 总结主动脉损伤患者17例（其中胸主动脉损伤15例、腹主动脉损伤2例）的诊疗过程,分析其诊断方法、手术时机的选择、手术方法,以及治疗结果。 结果 17例钝性外伤性主动脉损伤患者中,12例减速伤,1例为摩托车外伤,高空坠落伤2例,腹部挤压伤1例,胸部震荡伤1例;从受伤到确诊时间6 h~15 d,2例胸部CT平扫确诊,15例CT血管成像（CTA）确诊;胸降主动脉15例,腹主动脉损伤2例;13例胸降主动脉损伤行腔内修复术,1例腹主动脉损伤患者行开腹人工血管置换术,1例腹主动脉夹层随访观察,2例患者未及治疗死亡。 结论 钝性外伤性主动脉损伤可以通过CTA明确诊断,应根据患者主动脉损伤的程度、并发损伤尤其是脑损伤选择合适的治疗时机,腔内修复手术是目前治疗胸降主动脉损伤的最佳治疗手段。     

Indications for intravenous pyelography in trauma

The cornerstone for radiographic evaluation of genitourinary trauma is intravenous pyelography (IVP). Despite its widespread use, however, the indications for emergency IVP in trauma remain controversial. Some authors recommend the use of an IVP for all patients with hematuria, while others are selective, basing their decision on the degree of hematuria or such other factors as the mechanism of injury, physical examination, or the presence of associated injuries. Based on the data reviewed for blunt and penetrating trauma, we recommend that an IVP be performed in: all patients with gross hematuria; all patients who present with pain or tenderness that could be referrable to the genitourinary tract, even in the absence of hematuria; all patients with flank hematoma or ecchymosis; and all patients with penetrating trauma that could reasonably be expected to injure the genitourinary tract. Recently computed tomography (CT) has been proposed for the evaluation of renal trauma. The CT proponents cite superior definition of the extent of renal injury and superior detection of injuries not clinically suspected. Some have proposed the following algorithm, incorporating computed tomography. If an isolated renal injury is suspected clinically, an emergency IVP is performed. If the IVP is normal, expectant conservative treatment follows. If the IVP is abnormal or if the patient has persistent symptoms, an emergency CT scan is performed. Furthermore computed tomography is performed initially in the stable patient with multiple trauma and in the patient with suspected severe renal injury. While this algorithm has not been universally accepted, future studies confirming the theoretical advantages of this approach are anticipated.     

Factors affecting early exsanguination and death in blunt thoracic aortic trauma

The traditional approach to blunt thoracic aortic injuries has been expedient diagnosis and operative repair due to the significant risk of early exsanguination and death in initial survivors. Nonoperative management has been advocated in patients with multiple injuries to reduce the operative mortality. However, specific clinical parameters and diagnostic tests that may predict the risk of early exsanguination and death have yet to be identified. A retrospective analysis of 80 patients with these injuries was undertaken to identify factors associated with early exsanguination or death. Available aortograms were also examined and graded to determine their utility in predicting these outcomes. Early exsanguination and death were found to be associated with low systolic blood pressure on admission and with short duration from injury to diagnosis. Exsanguination was also associated with the total number of lesions in thoracic injuries, and mortality with age greater than 30 years. Aortographic appearance was not found to correlate with either outcome. Patients with blunt thoracic aortic injuries should continue to be managed expediently, with immediate surgical repair if not contraindicated by associated injuries, to avoid early rupture.     

Treatment of thoracic aortic disease using endovascular stent-grafts: from therapeutic indications to possible complications

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a minimally invasive technique which is increasingly used in different thoracic aortic pathologies such as aortic aneurysm, complicated type B aortic dissection, aortic trauma, intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer. In this paper we discuss the main indications for endovascular stent-grafts in the treatment of thoracic aortic disease, based on three cases in which this procedure was used for three different conditions: degenerative aneurysm, complicated type B dissection and post-traumatic injury. These case reports add to the evidence that TEVAR is a safe and feasible therapeutic alternative in selected patients with thoracic aortic disease, improving aortic remodeling, with relatively low morbidity and mortality. The main complications and difficulties related to the procedure are also discussed.     

Use of Transesophageal Echocardiography for the Assessment of Traumatic Aortic Injuries

Acute traumatic lesions of the thoracic aorta or its branches (TLA) constitute highly lethal yet treatable injuries that are increasingly diagnosed in surviving patients. Traumatic disruptions are limited to the region of the aortic isthmus in ∼ 90% of cases. Unlike aortography, usually referred as the gold standard diagnostic technique, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a noninvasive imaging modality that can be rapidly performed at the patient bedside. Accordingly, TEE is being increasingly used as a first-line screening test for the evaluation of patients with suspected TLA. The TEE signs associated with TLA depend on the anatomic type of aortic disruption. After a period of validation, multiplane TEE allows accurate diagnosis of traumatic disruptions of the aortic isthmus, with a sensitivity of 88% (range, 57%–100%) and a specificity of 96% (range, 84%–100%). False-negative TEE results have been mainly attributed to lacerations of aortic branches. Accordingly, aortography must be routinely performed when a traumatic injury to brachiocephalic arteries is suspected. False-positive TEE findings have been associated with the presence of ultrasound artifacts or atherosclerotic changes that mimic TLA. Accurate determination of the depth of aortic wall tears and diagnosis of blunt cardiac injuries during the TEE study are crucial to guide patient management. The presence of TEE signs associated with imminent risk of adventitial rupture should lead to prompt surgery. The use of TEE as a first-line imaging modality simplifies the initial assessment of patients at high risk for TLA and helps guide acute management.     

Chyle leakage after blunt trauma.

Three patients developed chylous leakage after major blunt trauma. In one patient with non-remitting right-sided chylothorax, lymphangioscintigraphy as well as conventional oil contrast lymphography demonstrated disruption of the thoracic duct at the aortic hiatus which eventually required transpleural mediastinal ductal ligation proximal to the fistula. The other two patients had chylous retroperitoneum and/or chylous peritoneum which was self-limited although one patient (a three-year-old boy) died of multiorgan failure from associated pulmonary contusions and cervical spine injuries. Chylous leak after non-penetrating trauma is usually attributed to hyperflexion-extension of the vertebral column with shearing of tethered lymphatics. Alternatively, sudden compression of lipemic and engorged mesenteric lymphatics, adjacent nodes and the lower thoracic duct aggravated by deformations associated with stretching and tearing motions may also directly disrupt chyle-containing lymphatics.     

Determinants of outcome in lesions of the thoracic aorta in patients with multiorgan system trauma.

Of all patients presenting at our level 1 trauma center with multiorgan system injuries, 33 have been identified with acute lesions of the thoracic aorta. Mean severity injury score was 24 +/- 3. Four patients underwent resuscitative thoracotomy upon arrival in the emergency department. One survived and fully recovered. The rest underwent diagnostic procedures and repair of aortic lesions in conjunction with surgical treatment of other injured organ systems. The overall survival rate was 82 percent. Survivors arrived significantly faster to the ED and had lesser degree of multiorgan system injuries. There was no difference in the time spent to make the diagnosis of acute aortic disruption for survivors and nonsurvivors, nor was a difference in time to arrive in the operating room once the diagnosis of aortic injury has been established. Morbidity was related to ischemia to distal organs in four patients of whom two presented with multiple lesions of the thoracic aorta; two remained paralyzed and two had only lower limb spasticity. All discharged survivors were alive at 12 months' follow-up. The type of surgical repair did not influence the outcome of patients with single, typical aortic lesions; however, "clamp/sew" technique was not adequate when multiple aortic tears were found intraoperatively. The outcome of surgical treatment of the traumatic aortic lesions of patients with polytrauma may be influenced by the speed of arrival to the ED, the magnitude of multiorgan system involvement, and the application of appropriate surgical technique for repair according to the intrathoracic findings and the timing of aortic repair vis-a-vis other surgical treatment.     

Clinical update on management of pancreatic trauma

Background

Pancreatic injury is rare and optimal diagnosis and management is still debated. The aim of this study was to review the existing data and consensus on management of pancreatic trauma.

The prognostic importance of trauma scoring systems for blunt thoracic trauma

BACKGROUND: Early identification and aggressive management of blunt thoracic trauma are essential to reduce the significant rates of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the independent predictive value of 5 different trauma scoring systems (Revised Trauma Score [RTS], Trauma and Injury Severity Score [TRISS], Injury Severity Score [ISS], Lung Injury Scale [LIS], and Chest Wall Injury Scale [CWIS]) with respect to prognostic factors such as tube thoracostomy duration, the need for mechanical support and thoracotomy, the length of hospital and ICU stay, morbid conditions, and deaths of patients with blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: The records of 152 patients with blunt thoracic trauma were reviewed and data consisting of the patients' age and gender, blood pressure and respiratory rate on admission, the extent of chest wall and intrathoracic injury, types of associated injuries, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, the need for mechanical support and thoracotomy, tube thoracostomy duration, length of hospital and ICU stay, morbid conditions, and deaths were collected. The relations between the trauma scoring systems and prognostic factors were evaluated by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The analysis showed that only TRISS was an independent predictor of mortality and only LIS was an independent predictor of morbidity, the need for thoracotomy, and tube thoracostomy duration. TRISS and LIS were independent predictors of the length of ICU stay. ISS, CWIS, and LIS were independent predictors of the need for mechanical support. RTS, TRISS, ISS and LIS were independent predictors of the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The LIS grade appeared to correlate with the severity of blunt thoracic injury and was found to be the most useful scoring system in predicting the outcomes of these patients.     

Endovascular repair of traumatic thoracic aortic injuries: a critical appraisal

Blunt trauma to the thoracic aorta is life-threatening, with instant fatality in at least 75% of victims. If left untreated, nearly half of those who survive the initial injury will die within the first 24 hours. Surgical repair has been the standard treatment of blunt aortic injury, but immediate operative intervention is frequently difficult due to concomitant injuries. Although endovascular treatment of traumatic aortic disruption is less invasive than conventional repair via thoracotomy, this strategy remains controversial in young patients due to anatomical considerations and device limitations. This article reviews the likely advantages of endovascular interventions for blunt thoracic aortic injuries. Potential limitations and clinical outcomes of this minimally invasive technique are also discussed.     

Pulmonary and respiratory complications of pediatric trauma

Pediatric trauma management requires both operative and nonoperative (supportive) care. Fewer than 15% of pediatric trauma patients require surgery (Children's Hospital of Michigan Registry Data, excluding fractures), and the primacy of closed head injury and the multisystem nature of pediatric trauma dictate assessment and therapy. Complications arise at every level, including fluid resuscitation (too much or too little), antibiotics (too late), or pain control (inadequate). The institution of mechanical ventilation that is usually life-saving carries its own risks including those associated with intubation (perforation, aspiration, pro longed endotracheal intubation (stricture, pneumonia), and barotrauma (ventilator-induced lung injury). Minor procedures, such as thoracentesis, chest tube insertion, and pericardiocentesis, can all be complicated by perforation and hemorrhage. Major interventions, including laparotomy and thoracotomy, can result in hemorrhage, air leak, abdominal compartment syndrome, phrenic nerve and thoracic duct injury, postoperative abscess, and septicemia. Transfusion, cardiopulmonary bypass, and invasive monitoring can result in coagulopathy and vascular injury. Prolonged resuscitation and operative explorations can cause hypothermia and coagulopathy and initiate a cascade of multiorgan failure and ARDS. There is no doubt that rapid evacuation, prompt resuscitation, and organized systems of pediatric trauma care have reduced the overall mortality of childhood trauma. The higher velocity of travel and an increasingly chaotic urban environment have resulted in more multitrauma cases and in injuries of higher severity requiring more sophisticated and complicated diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Our ability to identify life-threatening injuries, to provide expedited and definitive care, and to reduce and detect the complications predicted by these injuries and their treatment will result in long-term improvements in survival and significant reductions in morbidity.     

Imaging in blunt thoracic trauma: The importance of clinical correlation

We present the case of a 26‐year‐old female restrained front‐seat passenger who presents following a motor vehicle accident, with CT angiogram features suggestive of possible acute aortic injury. However, clinical features including relative hemodynamic stability and absence of typical symptoms were discordant with these imaging findings. This case illustrates that even with ECG‐gating, CT angiogram artifact mimicking acute aortic injury may still occur. Careful evaluation and clinical correlation is of vital importance, both to ensure acute aortic injury is not missed and that patients are not erroneously sent for aortic surgery when there is no aortic injury. Careful clinical evaluation must be combined with imaging in all cases of suspected aortic trauma, and at times multimodality imaging is indicated to direct the decision making strategy.