High-dose factor VIII inhibits factor VIII-specific memory B cells in hemophilia A with factor VIII inhibitors

Hemophilia A in its severe form is a life-threatening hemorrhagic disease that is caused by mutations in the factor VIII (FVIII) gene (symbol F8). About 25% of patients who receive replacement therapy develop neutralizing antibodies that inhibit the function of substituted FVIII. Long-term application of high doses of FVIII has evolved as an effective therapy to eradicate the antibodies and to induce long-lasting immune tolerance. Little is known, however, about the immunologic mechanisms that cause the down-modulation of anti-FVIII antibodies by high doses of FVIII. We report that high doses of FVIII inhibit the restimulation of FVIII-specific memory B cells and their differentiation into antibody-secreting plasma cells in vitro and in vivo in a murine model of hemophilia A. The inhibition of memory B-cell responses is irreversible and not mediated by FVIII-specific T cells. Furthermore, it seems to involve the activation of caspases. We conclude that the inhibition of FVIII-specific memory B cells might be an early event in the down-modulation of anti-FVIII antibodies in patients with hemophilia A who receive high doses of FVIII.     

Immune tolerance induction with recombinant factor VIII in hemophilia A patients with high responding inhibitors

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) eradicates inhibitors in patients with hemophilia A. This study was designed to investigate the success rate of ITI in high-responding inhibitor patients with severe hemophilia A using recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII). Twenty-six patients received different ITI regimens until a normal recovery (>66%) and half-life (>6 h) of infused FVIII was achieved. In order to maximize the chance of success, the initiation of ITI was deferred in the majority of patients until the inhibitor declined to <10 BU. Twenty-two patients (85%) had baseline inhibitor levels <10 BU (median 2.3 BU) when ITI began. Within a median of 6 months, immune tolerance was achieved in 19 of 26 patients (73%) including 12/17 (70%) with intron 22 inversion, 5/7 (71%) with other null mutations and two with small deletion/insertions in the F8 gene. In conclusion, recombinant FVIII induces a high rate of immune tolerance even in carriers of null F8 mutations.     

Characteristics of hemophilia patients with factor VIII inhibitors detected by prospective screening

Characteristics of inhibitors identified by prospective screening may differ from those detected clinically. In a prospective study at 17 hemophilia centers with central inhibitor measurement by Nijmegen‐Bethesda assay, 23 (2.8%) of 824 hemophilia A patients had new inhibitors detected: nine high‐titer inhibitors (HTI: 7 ≥ 5.0 NBU plus 2 of 2.6 and 3.4 NBU at immune tolerance induction initiation) and 14 low‐titer inhibitors (LTI: 0.5–1.9 NBU). HTI occurred at an earlier age (median 2 years, range 1–18, vs. median 11 years, range 2–61, P = 0.016). Both HTI (22%) and LTI (43%) occurred in non‐severe patients. All HTI, but only 64% of LTI, were found to be FVIII‐specific by chromogenic Bethesda assay or fluorescence immunoassay (FLI), indicating a high rate of false‐positive LTI. Repeat specimens confirmed all HTI, 7/9 LTI, and 7/7 FVIII‐specific LTI. FLI results were similar between HTI and FVIII‐specific LTI; all included IgG₁ and IgG₄ subclasses. A comparable prospective study conducted from 1975 to 1979 at 13 U.S. centers found 31 (2.4%) new inhibitors among 1,306 patients. In both studies, one‐third of inhibitors occurred in non‐severe patients and one‐quarter after 150 exposure days (ED). Significant differences were seen in the age at which inhibitors occurred (median 16 years in the older study vs. 5 years currently, P = 0.024) and in ED before inhibitor development, 10% in the older study and 43% currently study occurring within 20 ED, suggesting a temporal change in inhibitor development. Prospective screening detects inhibitors in patients of all severities, ages, and ED. Some LTI, however, are false positives. Am. J. Hematol. 90:871–876, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Incidence of inhibitors in patients with severe and moderate hemophilia A treated with factor VIII concentrates

Recent data published on the prevalence of inhibitors to factor VIII in hemophiliacs on treatment show great variations, with prevalence rates ranging from 3.6 to 14.2%. We have studied the cumulative risk of inhibitor development in a cohort of 62 patients with hemophilia A. All patients were born after 1960, were natives of the Vienna area, had a factor VIII activity of less than 5%, and were treated at least once. Using the method of Cutler and Ederer, the cumulative risk of inhibitor development was found to be 24% at the age of 25 years. Most inhibitors developed between the ages of 3 and 7 years. The current prevalence of F VIII inhibitors in the group of patients studied is 17.5%. It is concluded that prevalence data underestimate the true risk of inhibitor development.     

Influence of the type of factor VIII concentrate on the incidence of factor VIII inhibitors in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A

Inhibitor development is the major treatment complication in children with severe hemophilia A. It is not clear whether the risk of inhibitors is higher with recombinant factor VIII or with plasma-derived factor VIII. We used multivariate analysis to compare 2 cohorts of previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A: 62 patients treated with the same brand of high-purity plasma-derived FVIII (pFVIII) containing von Willebrand factor (VWF) and 86 patients treated with full-length recombinant FVIII (rFVIII). In addition to the usual end points (all inhibitors, high inhibitors), we also examined a third end point (high inhibitors and/or immune tolerance induction). The risk of inhibitor development was higher in patients treated with rFVIII than in patients treated with pFVIII, regardless of other risk factors (F8 genotype; nonwhite origin; history of inhibitors in patients with a family history of hemophilia; age at first FVIII infusion). The adjusted relative risk (RRa) for inhibitor development with rFVIII versus pFVIII was 2.4 (all inhibitors), 2.6 (high inhibitors), and 3.2 (high inhibitors and/or immune tolerance induction), respectively, depending on the end point (above). The pathophysiology of this large effect must be understood in order to improve the characteristics of recombinant products and to reduce the incidence of inhibitors to FVIII.     

Antibodies to factor VIII in hemophilia A patients

Inhibitor development represents the main complication in the treatment of haemophilia A. The risk of inhibitor formation is in part genetically determined by the type of the underlying factor VIII gene lesion but environmental factors may also play an important role. Due to the lack of efficiency of factor VIII in these patients other therapeutic agents must be used for the treatment of bleedings, however, none is as effective as factor VIII in a non-inhibitor patient. Therefore, the eridication of the inhibitor through immune tolerance therapy is the treatment of choice. Centralized national and international immune tolerance registries have collected the results and show cost effectiveness of this treatment.     

Assaying the circulating factor VIII activity in hemophilia A patients treated with recombinant factor VIII products

Large discrepancies between factor VIII assay methods have been reported from pharmacokinetic studies of recombinant factor VIII concentrates. In the assay of postinfusion patient plasma samples, traditional activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based one-stage clotting methods usually give results that are 20 to 50% lower than those obtained by chromogenic substrate assays. Investigations into the cause of these discrepancies have shown that the choice of phospholipid in the one-stage assay is crucial. The use of platelets or liposomes resembling platelet factor 3 instead of traditional aPTT reagents results in an increase in the apparent one-stage activity and a fairly good correlation with the chromogenic results. These and other functional test results, antigen measurements as well as clinical data, support the view that the chromogenic assay most accurately reflects the therapeutic effect. In addition to the differences among assay methods, there is also a discrepancy between the World Health Organization (WHO) standards for concentrates and plasma. The use of product-specific standards, prepared by diluting the factor VIII concentrate into hemophilic plasma, when assaying postinfusion plasma samples seems to be a feasible approach to overcome the problems encountered in pharmacokinetic studies.     

Prevention and treatment of factor VIII inhibitors in murine hemophilia A

Inhibitory antibody formation is a major complication of factor VIII replacement therapy in patients with hemophilia A. To better understand the pathogenesis of this immunologic reaction, we evaluated the role of T-cell costimulatory signals for antifactor VIII antibody formation in a murine model of hemophilia A. Repeated intravenous injections of factor VIII in these factor VIII-deficient mice induced an antifactor VIII inhibitor antibody response. This response was shown to be T-cell dependent by its absence in hemophilic mice also deficient for the T-cell costimulatory ligand B7-2. In separate experiments, injection of murine CTLA4-Ig completely blocked the primary response to factor VIII in hemophilic mice with intact B7 function. This reagent also prevented or diminished further increases in antifactor VIII when given to hemophilic mice with low antifactor VIII antibody titers. These studies suggest that strategies targeting the B7-CD28 pathway are potential therapies to prevent and treat inhibitory antifactor VIII antibodies. Moreover, because the development of antibodies to replaced proteins may limit the success of many human gene therapy approaches, our results may be broadly applicable. (Blood. 2000;95:1324-1329)     

Kinetics of factor VIII:C inhibitors and treatment response in severe hemophilia A patients

Severe hemophilia A (HA) patients develop inhibitory alloantibodies to factor VIII:C and therefore require bypass agents that are scarce, expensive and may provoke secondary effects. Twenty-three severe HA patients who were high-responders to FVIII inhibitors were studied. FVIII:C activity in plasma was measured by one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time method, and the quantification of FVIII:C inhibitors was carried out by the Nijmegen-Bethesda method. Inhibition kinetics was assessed through serial plasma dilutions. FVIII:C activity was <1% in all patients. Kinetics behavior of the inhibitors was classified as type I in 14 patients, type II in four and an intermediate pattern that we named type III in one case. We were unable to apply the regression model to the remaining four of 23 patients in the study because of their low inhibitory titer (<3 Nijmegen-Bethesda units per ml). Seventy-eight percent of the patients with inhibitor type I did not respond to high doses of FVIII therapy, whereas 50% of patients with type II kinetics did (P = 0.5323). Generally, patients belonging to the same family had similar kinetics behavior as well as concordant treatment response. Although nonsignificant, our results suggest an association between kinetics behavior and treatment response that may be a valuable prognostic parameter for the management of these patients.     

Immune tolerance induction with highly purified plasma-derived factor VIII containing von Willebrand factor in hemophilia A patients with high-responding inhibitors

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of immune tolerance induction (ITI) in a homogenous cohort of eight patients with constitutive severe hemophilia A with high-responding factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors using Facteur VIII-LFB/Factane, a highly purified FVIII concentrate containing von Willebrand factor (VWF).     

Mutation analysis of factor VIII in Korean patients with severe hemophilia A

Hemophilia A is an X-linked recessive disorder caused by mutations of the factor VIII gene. The mutation spectrum has been reported in various populations, but not in Koreans. Mutation analysis of the factor VIII gene was performed in 22 unrelated Korean patients with severe hemophilia A. We extracted genomic DNA from their blood, and assessed intron inversions, deletions, and point mutations by direct DNA sequencing. A multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification gene dosage assay was also performed to identify exon deletions. Disease-causing mutations were identified in all patients, of which four cases were previously unreported. Seven intron 22 inversions, nine point mutations (6 nonsense mutations and 3 missense mutations), and four small rearrangements were identified. One multi-exon deletion and one 5′-donor splicing site mutation were also observed. Four novel mutations (one small deletion, one multiple exon deletion, one missense, and one splice site mutation) were detected, and point mutations were predominant (40.9%), followed by intron 22 inversions (31.8%). Further studies are required in order to establish a solid conclusion regarding the prevalence of various mutations in the Korean population.     

Noncoagulation inhibitory factor VIII antibodies after induction of tolerance to factor VIII in hemophilia A patients

We recently described tolerance induction with factor VIII/IX, cyclophosphamide, and high-dose intravenous IgG in hemophilia A or B patients with coagulation inhibitory antibodies. Circulating noninhibitory antibodies complexed with factor IX have been demonstrated in tolerant hemophilia B patients. Similar findings are now described in six tolerant hemophilia A patients. Complexes between factor VIII and the 'tolerant' antibody were demonstrated by subjecting plasma to gel filtration chromatography, void fractions containing factor VIII/vWF complexes being collected and adsorbed to protein A. Using 125I-labeled F(ab')2 fragments against IgG subclass and factor VIII antigen, complexes between an IgG4 antibody and factor VIII were found to adsorb to protein A. After infusion of factor VIII to tolerant patients, all factor VIII circulated in complex with IgG4 antibody. In three of the patients, the 'tolerant' antibodies inhibited an ELISA specific for factor VIII light chain but, unlike the pretolerant antibodies, did not bind radiolabeled factor VIII heavy chain. Although after induction of tolerance the patients still have circulating IgG4 antibodies against factor VIII, the antibodies differ in specificity, lack coagulation inhibitory activity, and do not enhance the rate of elimination of factor VIII.     

Immune tolerance in hemophilia with factor VIII inhibitors: predictors of success.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Long term administration of high doses of factor VIII (FVIII) was shown to eliminate alloantibodies to FVIII (FVIII inhibitors). This procedure is widely referred to as immune tolerance (IT). DESIGN AND METHODS: In 1989 an international registry of IT protocols was created which recruited 314 patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) and an inhibitor who were given IT treatment. RESULTS: Fifty hemophilia care centers worldwide contributed data to the registry; 94.8% of the patients were high responders. The median inhibitor titer prior to IT (pre-titer) was 7 BU (range 0-720). The FVIII doses ranged from <50 International Units (I.U.)/kg/b.w./day to >200. At the end of IT, 140 patients had undetectable inhibitor titers, including 128 who also had normal FVIII kinetics. The remaining 174 patients included 66 with treatment failure, 23 who achieved partial responses, 48 patients in whom treatment was ongoing and 37 with data inadequate to evaluate outcome. Using logistic regression, the best predictive model for success included maximum inhibitor titer, pre-titer, dose and age at treatment. FVIII dose and pre-titer were also associated with treatment duration, as was the time between inhibitor detection and treatment. The risk of relapse was approximately 15% after 15 years of follow-up. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the importance of starting IT as early as possible, at the lowest inhibitor titer and with high FVIII doses in order to maximize the chance of treatment success and minimize treatment costs.     

Incidence of factor VIII inhibitors throughout life in severe hemophilia A in the United Kingdom

The age-adjusted incidence of new factor VIII inhibitors was analyzed in all United Kingdom patients with severe hemophilia A between 1990 and 2009. Three hundred fifteen new inhibitors were reported to the National Hemophilia Database in 2528 patients with severe hemophilia who were followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 12 (4-19) years. One hundred sixty (51%) of these arose in patients ≥ 5 years of age after a median (interquartile range) of 6 (4-11) years' follow-up. The incidence of new inhibitors was 64.29 per 1000 treatment-years in patients < 5 years of age and 5.31 per 1000 treatment-years at age 10-49 years, rising significantly (P = .01) to 10.49 per 1000 treatment-years in patients more than 60 years of age. Factor VIII inhibitors arise in patients with hemophilia A throughout life with a bimodal risk, being greatest in early childhood and in old age. HIV was associated with significantly fewer new inhibitors. The inhibitor incidence rate ratio in HIV-seropositive patients was 0.32 times that observed in HIV-seronegative patients (P < .001). Further study is required to explore the natural history of later-onset factor VIII inhibitors and to investigate other potential risk factors for inhibitor development in previously treated patients.     

Antifactor VIII antibody inhibiting allogeneic but not autologous factor VIII in patients with mild hemophilia A

Two unrelated patients with the same Arg2150His mutation in the factor VIII (FVIII) C1 domain, a residual FVIII activity of 0.09 IU/mL, and inhibitor titres of 300 and 6 Bethesda Units, respectively, were studied. Further analysis of patient LE, with the highest inhibitor titer, showed that (1) plasma or polyclonal IgG antibodies prepared from LE plasma inhibited the activity of allogeneic (wild-type) but not of self FVIII; (2) the presence of von Willebrand factor (vWF) increased by over 10-fold the inhibitory activity on wild-type FVIII; (3) the kinetics of FVIII inhibition followed a type II pattern, but in contrast to previously described type II inhibitors, LE IgG was potentiated by the presence of vWF instead of being in competition with it; (4) polyclonal LE IgG recognized the FVIII light chain in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the recombinant A3-C1 domains in an immunoprecipitation assay, indicating that at least part of LE antibodies reacted with the FVIII domain encompassing the mutation site; and (5) LE IgG inhibited FVIII activity by decreasing the rate of FVIIIa release from vWF, but LE IgG recognized an epitope distinct from ESH8, a murine monoclonal antibody exhibiting the same property. We conclude that the present inhibitors are unique in that they clearly distinguish wild-type from self, mutated FVIII. The inhibition of wild-type FVIII by LE antibody is enhanced by vWF and is associated with an antibody-dependent reduced rate of FVIIIa release from vWF.     

Continuous infusion of porcine factor VIII in the management of patients with factor VIII inhibitors

The effectiveness of continuous infusion porcine factor VIII (PFVIII) has been evaluated in the treatment of 7 consecutive patients with factor VIII(FVIII) inhibitors. Two patients had hemophilia A and five were nonhemophiliacs with acquired FVIII inhibitors. The median pretreatment anti-porcine FVIII titre was 0.2 (range: 0–15.0) Bethesda units (BU), and the anti-human FVIII titer was 12.0 BU (range: 2.4–50.0). All patients presented with major bleeding. Patients were given a bolus dose of PFVIII followed by continuous infusion. Six patients also received immunosuppressive therapy. Therapeutic FVIII levels (>0.5 U/ml) were achieved in 6 of 7 patients at a median time of 12.5 hr, and then maintained with continuous infusion PFVIII. Six patients were treated for more than 7 days, and in four of these there was a decline in FVIII recovery between days 7 to 11, presumably related to a rising antibody response to PFVIII. These four patients were plasmapheresed and the three patients with autoantibodies recovered therapeutic FVIII levels but this did not occur in the patient with hemophilia. Thrombocytopenia developed in 4 patients at days 18 to 24, with the platelet count falling to 11 to 87 × 10⁹/L, and the PFVIII was discontinued in 3 patients. All patients recovered from the acute bleeding events. With prolonged immunosuppressive therapy, the FVIII inhibitor disappeared in all patients with autoantibodies and there have been no relapses after a median follow-up period of 581 days. This study demonstrates that continuous infusion PFVIII is an effective therapy for patients with FVIII inhibitors, but that prolonged treatment is associated with the development of inhibitors to porcine FVIII and severe thrombocytopenia, which readily corrects with discontinuation of PFVIII. Am. J. Hematol. 56:112–118, 1997. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Acquired hemophilia. A natural history study of 16 patients with factor VIII inhibitors receiving little or no therapy

Rarely, a patient develops an antibody against factor VIII coagulant activity. The resultant hemorrhagic diathesis is clinically distinct from inherited hemophilia, being characterized by few hemarthroses but frequent skin and other soft-tissue hematomas. Hematuria may be troublesome. These patients represent therapeutic challenges. This study is one institution's results with 16 such patients followed up over an average of 31 months (range, four to 120 months; median, 19 months). It describes the largest group from a single institution receiving essentially no immunosuppressive agents, yet has one of the better overall results. Two patients experienced fatal hemorrhage and five patients underwent spontaneous remission. Long-term survival is not incompatible with persistence of the inhibitor. We conclude that this hemorrhagic diathesis is clinically distinct, less fatal than usually perceived, and may undergo spontaneous remission. Clearly, there is no mandate for any particular therapeutic regimen, such as immunosuppression, in the attempt to rid the patient of the antibody.     

Antibodies to factor VIII in plasma of patients with hemophilia A and normal subjects

 Non-neutralizing factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies (FVIII-Ab) in hemophilia A may be associated with an abnormal clinical response to FVIII concentrates. Patients with FVIII inhibitors may develop noncoagulation FVIII-Ab after the induction of immunotolerance. Natural FVIII-Ab may be detected in the plasma of some healthy subjects. The aim of this study was to analyze the presence of FVIII-Ab in the plasma of 53 normal blood donors and 124 patients with hemophilia A (18 patients had a previous history of FVIII inhibitor, but only 12 had inhibitor at the moment this study was performed). FVIIII inhibitor was measured using the Bethesda method. FVIII-Ab were analyzed by a specific ELISA assay using purified FVIII from a monoclonal concentrate and a standard plasma containing 26 Bethesda units (BU) of FVIII inhibitor. Purified FVIII was used to coat wells of a microtiter plate and was incubated with dilutions of plasma to be tested. Bound human IgG FVIII-Ab were detected by incubation with polyclonal sheep anti.human IgG alkaline phosphatase conjugate, and the OD₄₀₅ was quantitated. A linear fit was obtained (by plotting FVIII-Ab positivity [OD 405nm] versus BU titer) when serial dilutions of this standard inhibitor plasma, containing titers of 0.5 BU or higher, were used. Four different levels of FVIII-Ab positivity [OD 405nm] were distinguished in this assay: Negative levels (–) were obtained with dilutions of the standard inhibitor containing <0.5 BU. Mild levels (+) were obtained with dilutions of 0.5–5 BU. Moderate levels (++) were obtained for dilutions ranging from 5–25 BU. Maximum positivity (+++) was obtained for dilutions of titers > 25 BU. FVIII-Ab positivity was detected in eight of the normal subjects (15%): three were found to be moderately positive (++) and five mildly positive (+). No inhibitory activity was detectable when whole plasma was used. All the hemophilic patients with a presence of FVIII inhibitor at the time of the study were found to be positive for FVIII-Ab. In addition, the level of positivity correlated with the corresponding BU. Four of the six patients who had a history of inhibitor were negative and two positive. Twenty additional patients (16.12%) in whom no inhibitory activity was detected were found to be positive for FVIII-Ab: 16 + and four ++. The mean age of patients with FVIII-Ab positivity was significantly higher than that of patients of the FVIII-Ab negative group (p<0.005). In conclusion, FVIII-Ab positivity in patients with hemophilia A was 17.7% higher than the level of positivity detected by an inhibitory assay. We propose that this method for FVIII-Ab analysis could be used for patients with hemophilia A, at least to complement the functional inhibitor assay. FVIII recovery or half-life should be assessed in patients who test positive for FVIII-Ab and who show no evidence of inhibitor. Received: 31 July 1995 / Accepted: 25 January 1996