Serum IGF-I measured by four different immunoassays in patients with adult GH deficiency or acromegaly and in a control population

Background  IGF-I is a useful tool in GH disorders diagnosis, however, the use of commercially available kits needs to be validated.
Objective  To validate the use of serum IGF-I concentrations measured by four immunoassays in the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency and acromegaly.
Design  Cross-sectional study.
Patients  Fifty GH-deficient (GHD) patients, 41 acromegaly patients and 405 controls.
Measurements  Serum IGF-I concentrations were measured by four commercial immunoassays: (1) RIA-NICHOLS; (2) ICMA-IMMULITE; (3) IRMA-IMMUNOTECH; and (4) non-extraction-IRMA-DSL. Reference values were established from the control population in six age groups. Individual results were transformed to standard deviation score (SD score) from the age-related reference population and reference data provided by each assay manufacturer. Diagnostic sensitivity for GH deficiency was calculated.
Results  IGF-I measured by the four assays differed significantly. In controls, assay 2 yielded the lowest results, followed by assays 1, 3 and 4 ( P <  0·0001 for all comparisons). IGF-I declined with age, but no sex-related differences were observed. When IGF-I was standardized with respect to reference data obtained from the manufacturers, it showed better sensitivity in assays 1 and 2, than with our controls (65% vs. 77·5% and 58% vs. 70%, respectively) for GHD diagnosis. With assays 3 and 4, higher sensitivity was obtained when standardized with our controls (62% vs. 52% and 56% vs. 36%, respectively). In acromegaly, IGF-I was > 2 SD score with all assays.
Conclusions  IGF-I SD score for GHD diagnosis differed according to the normative data used. All assays proved to be useful for active acromegaly diagnosis.     

Discordance between mass spectrometry and immunometric IGF-1 assay in pituitary disease: a prospective study

Purpose

Measuring IGF-1, a biomarker for GH activity, is critical to evaluating disordered hypothalamic-pituitary GH axis. Inconsistent IGF-1 measurements among different immunoassays are well documented. We switched from Immulite 2000 immunoassay to narrow-mass-extraction, high-resolution liquid chromatography mass-spectrometry (LC-MS) compliant with recent consensus recommendations on assay standardization. Comparability of these two assays in patients with pituitary disease in a clinical practice setting is not known. We sought to compare IGF-1 levels on Immulite 2000 and LC-MS in samples from naïve and treated patients with secretory and non-secretory pituitary masses.

Methods

We prospectively collected serum samples from 101 patients treated at the Cedars-Sinai Pituitary Center between February 2012 and March 2014. We intentionally recruited more patients with acromegaly or GH deficiency to ensure a clinically representative cohort. Samples were classified as in or out of the respective reference ranges. Bland–Altman analysis was used to assess agreement between assays.

Results

Twenty-four percent of samples were classified differently as below, in, or above range. Agreement between the assays was poor overall, with a significant bias for immunoassay reporting higher values than LC-MS. This pattern was also observed in patients with acromegaly and those with ≥?2 pituitary hormone deficiencies.

Conclusions

IGF-1 results may differ after switching from an older immunoassay to a consensus-compliant assay such as LC-MS. Clinicians should consider the potential impact of assay switching before altering treatment due to discrepant results, particularly in patients monitored over time, such as those with acromegaly and GH deficiency.

     

Central reassessment of GH concentrations measured at local treatment centers in children with impaired growth: consequences for patient management

OBJECTIVE: GH deficiency is diagnosed in children if serum GH fails to rise above a predefined cutoff value in response to at least two stimuli. Diagnostic decisions based on this testing are highly variable between centers and depend on the GH assays used. Considering the large spectrum of commercially available GH assays, we wanted to evaluate the agreement between assays, and to test whether assay-related variability of diagnostic decisions could be reduced by reassessment of peak GH concentrations in a reference center. DESIGN: We reanalysed 699 peak GH serum samples obtained after GH testing of 382 children and adolescents from 19 centers using three reference assays and compared these results with those obtained with the local assays. A subgroup of 132 patients tested with the combination of insulin hypoglycemia test and arginine test was evaluated for changes in the assignment to the diagnostic group of GH deficiency. RESULTS: The mean difference between methods ranged from 5.4 to 10.3 mU/l, slopes of the regression lines from 1.28 to 1.65. Significant non-linearity was detected in five of six assay comparisons, indicating that most assay results cannot be interconverted by the use of a factor. Overall agreement between reference and local assays was only moderate. Significant changes in diagnostic assignment occurred when different assays were used on the same patient (P<0.0001-P<0.0023). Based on GH remeasurement by one reference assay, 36 of 132 patients were categorized differently, with 35 patients changing into the GH-deficient group. Similar findings were obtained with the other reference assays. CONCLUSIONS: To decrease variability in GH testing related to assays and cutoff values, we recommend nationwide reassessment of GH peak sera in reference centers. Decisions to treat GH deficiency should incorporate the reference center results.     

Serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels in healthy children between 0 and 6 years of age

Objective: Along with growth hormone (GH) levels, measurements of serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) are used in the diagnosis of GH deficiency and in monitoring the efficacy and safety of long-term GH treatment. The purpose of the present study was to establish reference values for serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 in healthy Turkish children less than 6 years of age.Methods: This study was designed as a multicenter project. Five hundred sixty-seven healthy children younger than 6 years of age from different geographical regions of Turkey, with weight and height values between the 10th and 90th percentiles according to the national standards were included in the study. In addition to anthropometric parameters, serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels were measured in all subjects.Results: Although not statistically significant, the serum IGF-1 levels in infants at age 6 months were lower than those in infants at age 3 months. The IGF-1 levels showed a slow increase with age. Serum IGF-1 levels were lower in girls as compared to boys only at age 6 months. No correlation was found between either serum IGFBP-3 levels and body mass index (BMI) or serum IGFBP-3 and weight and height standard deviation scores (SDS). A weak correlation was observed between serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 concentrations.Conclusions: The age- and gender-specific reference values for serum IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 reported in this study will aid in the diagnosis of GH deficiency and in the monitoring of children receiving GH treatment.Conflict of interest:None declared.     

Approach to the evaluation of the GH/IGF-axis in patients with pituitary disease: which test to order

The diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) and acromegaly involves assessment of serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) concentrations. The diagnosis of AGHD typically requires a provocative test of GH reserve, but is supported by demonstration of low-serum IGF-1 levels. Therapeutic monitoring of rhGH replacement is performed utilizing measurement of serum IGF-1 concentrations. In patients with suspected acromegaly, the diagnosis is confirmed by elevated serum IGF-1 levels and further validated by the presence of elevated GH levels both before and following an oral glucose load. A goal of acromegaly therapy is to normalize IGF-1 concentrations, and, depending on the therapeutic modality, GH levels as well. Using case based clinical scenarios, we have presented a standard approach to the biochemical diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of these disorders.     

Evaluating diagnosis methods on childhood GH (DGH) deficiency: IGFs, IGFBPs, releasing tests, GH rhythm and image exams

The diagnostic approach to growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children with short stature (SS) is controversial. Here we review the available methodology and present prospective data obtained in a cohort of patients with SS suggesting the use of screening test followed by the confirmation test. Thus, the children with SS should be submitted to clinical and laboratorial evaluation to exclude of chronic and genetic diseases. In addition patients with height<3 percentile or growth velocity-1 SD, the growth velocity should have observed and GH/IGF-1 axis re-evaluated if the growth pattern is not satisfactory.     

Growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in GH-deficient women during pregnancy

OBJECTIVE: The present recommendation is to discontinue GH replacement therapy in hypopituitary women, as they become pregnant. We report our experience of managing GH deficiency with GH replacement therapy in pregnant hypopituitary women. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Eight hypopituitary women, median age 30.5 years (range 20-39 years), were followed prospectively during 12 distinct pregnancies. Six women were receiving replacement therapy for other pituitary hormone deficiencies and five pregnancies were achieved with ovulation induction therapy. GH replacement therapy was maintained at the same pregestational dose during the first trimester, with a gradual decrease of the dose during the second trimester and discontinuing the treatment at the beginning of the third trimester. Serum IGF-1 levels were measured in four selected pregnancies at three different points, one in each trimester of gestation. RESULTS: Seven pregnancies resulted in normal vaginal deliveries and five had programmed Caesarian sections. The median gestation age at time of delivery was 40 weeks (range 33-42 weeks). Newborns had a median birthweight SD score of -0.37 (range -1.93 to 1.21) and a median birthlength SD score of 0.07 (range -2.73 to 1.53). No congenital malformations were observed. Three women were able to breastfeed their babies. Before gestation, the median daily dose of GH was 0.5 mg (range 0.3-0.8 mg) and the median serum IGF-1 was 37.5 nmol/l (range 7.6-54.5 nmol/l). IGF-1 levels were fairly constant in the first and second trimesters of gestation, showing an increment during the last trimester, when GH treatment was discontinued. CONCLUSION: The GH replacement regimen presented for pregnant women with GH deficiency was safe. No major side-effects and no negative influences on maternal and fetal outcome were observed.     

Variable estimates of serum growth hormone concentrations by different radioassay systems

Many different assays are being used to measure serum GH concentrations in children with disorders of growth. We assessed four readily available methods to determine the comparability of the immunopotency estimates: standard double antibody RIA with pituitary standards from the National Hormone and Pituitary Program (assay 1) and from a commercial source (assay 2), a double antibody RIA with serum standards (assay 4), and a commercial immunoradiometric assay (assay 3). There was a high degree of relative correlation between assays (r = 0.95-0.98), but absolute potency estimates differed. Assays 1 and 2 were almost identical. Assay 3 yielded serum GH levels about 65% those of assay 1 or 2 and 80% those of assay 4. Assay 4 gave intermediate values between the low readings in assay 3 and higher values in assay 1 and 2. We conclude that substantial variation occurs in potency estimates in different GH assays. Such differences can affect the interpretation of many GH provocative and sampling studies.     

Effects of swimming training on bone mass and the GH/IGF-1 axis in diabetic rats

The aim of this study was to examine the influence of moderate swimming training on the GH/IGF-1 growth axis and tibial mass in diabetic rats. Male Wistar rats were allocated to one of four groups: sedentary control (SC), trained control (TC), sedentary diabetic (SD) and trained diabetic (TD). Diabetes was induced with alloxan (35 mg/kg b.w.). The training program consisted of a 1h swimming session/day with a load corresponding to 5% of the b.w., five days/week for six weeks. At the end of the training period, the rats were sacrificed and blood was collected for quantification of the serum glucose, insulin, GH, and IGF-1 concentrations. Samples of skeletal muscle were used to quantify the IGF-1 peptide content. The tibias were collected to determine their total area, length and bone mineral content. The results were analyzed by ANOVA with P<0.05 indicating significance. Diabetes decreased the serum levels of GH and IGF-1, as well as the tibial length, total area and bone mineral content in the SD group (P<0.05). Physical training increased the serum IGF-1 level in the TC and TD groups when compared to the sedentary groups (SC and SD), and the tibial length, total area and bone mineral content were higher in the TD group than in the SD group (P<0.05). Exercise did not alter the level of IGF-1 in gastrocnemius muscle in nondiabetic rats, but the muscle IGF-1 content was higher in the TD group than in the SD group. These results indicate that swimming training stimulates bone mass and the GH/IGF-1 axis in diabetic rats.     

Serum leptin response to the acute and chronic administration of growth hormone (GH) to elderly subjects with GH deficiency

In human studies, the principal determinant of serum leptin concentrations is fat mass (FM), but lean mass (LM) also has a significant negative influence. GH treatment in GH deficiency (GHD) alters body composition, increasing LM and decreasing FM, and thus would be expected to alter leptin concentrations. We have therefore examined the acute and chronic effects of GH on serum leptin in 12 elderly GHD subjects (ages 62-85 yr; 3 women and 9 men). FM (kilograms) and LM (kilograms) were determined by dual energy x-ray absortiometry. Leptin, insulin, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-II, IGF-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), IGFBP-2, and IGFBP-3 were measured by specific immunoassays. Leptin, insulin, and IGFBP-1 concentrations were log10 transformed, and data were expressed as the geometric mean (-1, +1 tolerance factor). All other data are presented as the mean +/- SD. In the acute study, patients received a single bolus dose of GH (0.1 mg/kg BW) at time zero, with blood samples drawn at 0, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h and 1 and 2 weeks. There was a significant rise in leptin, insulin, and IGF-I at a median time of 24 h, followed by a significant fall, and nadir concentrations were reached at a median time of 1.5 weeks (leptin) or 2 weeks (insulin and IGF-I). IGFBP-3 concentrations were also significantly increased, but peak concentrations were not achieved until 48 h. IGF-II, IGFBP-1, and IGFBP-2 exhibited transient decreases before returning to baseline levels. There was no relationship between increased leptin concentrations and either insulin or IGF-I concentrations. In the chronic study, patients received daily GH treatment at doses of 0.17, 0.33, and 0.5 mg/day, each for 3 months (total time on GH, 9 months), and were then followed off GH for a further 3 months. Dual energy x-ray absortiometry was undertaken at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and blood samples were drawn at these time points. Over 9 months on GH there was a significant fall in FM and a significant rise in LM, but no change in leptin. There were also significant increments in insulin, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3, whereas IGF-II, IGFBP-1, and IGFBP-2 did not change over 9 months of GH treatment. After 3 months off GH, there was a significant rise in FM and leptin. High dose single bolus GH led to an increase in serum leptin within 24 h apparently independent of changes in insulin or IGF-I. Despite the changes in body composition during chronic GH treatment, there was no change in leptin. However, discontinuation of GH led to a rapid reversal of the favorable body composition and a rise in serum leptin.     

Discordance of IGF-1 and GH stimulation testing for altered GH secretion in obesity

ObjectiveTo investigate the concordance/discordance of IGF-1 and peak stimulated GH in identifying subjects with reduced GH secretion and to determine the physiological significance of any discordance in obese subjects.Design, patients and methods95 obese and 43 normal weight men and women underwent measurement of IGF-1 and GH stimulation testing with GH releasing hormone (GHRH)–arginine. Reduced IGF-1 and GH secretion were defined using pre-determined cut-points. Cardiovascular disease risk was determined by measuring carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). In a second study, IGF-1 was measured in 52 obese men and women who underwent GH stimulation testing and overnight frequent blood sampling. The association of IGF-1 and peak stimulated GH with parameters of endogenous GH secretion was assessed.Results60% of obese subjects had normal IGF-1 and peak stimulated GH while 8.4% of obese subjects had reduced IGF-1 and GH secretion. Discordance rate for IGF-1 and peak GH was 31.6%. Subjects with both low IGF-1 and low peak GH had the highest cIMT, while subjects with both normal IGF-1 and peak GH had the lowest cIMT. Subjects with reduction in either IGF-1 or peak GH, had intermediate cIMT (P = 0.02). IGF-1 and peak stimulated GH were associated with maximum and mean overnight serum GH and GH AUC as well as maximum peak mass and median pulse mass. Peak stimulated GH, but not IGF-1, was also associated with nadir overnight serum GH concentration and basal GH secretion.ConclusionPeak stimulated GH and IGF-1 demonstrate significant discordance in identification of subjects with reduced GH secretion in obesity. Subjects with reduction of either IGF-1 or peak GH had higher cIMT compared to subjects with both normal IGF-1 and peak GH. Subjects with reductions in both IGF-1 and peak GH had the highest cIMT. Peak GH, compared to IGF-1, has broader associations with various parameters of endogenous GH secretion which support its utility in identifying those with reduced GH secretion.     

Pre-treatment IGF-I level is the major determinant of GH dosage in adult GH deficiency

OBJECTIVE: Severe GH deficiency in adults is a definite clinical entity, the effects of which can be reversed by administration of subcutaneous recombinant GH. The ideal dosing regimen and determinants of the maintenance dose have, however, yet to be elucidated. PATIENTS: In an open study of GH replacement we treated 65 GH-deficient adults of mixed adult- and childhood-onset, of mean age 35.5 (range 17-72) years, and comprising 38 females and 27 males, using an individualized low-dose titration regimen aimed at normalization of the serum IGF-I and induction of clinical improvement. RESULTS: Before initiation of GH therapy, median IGF-I SD was significantly lower in female than male patients (- 3.3 vs. - 1.9, P = 0.007) and in childhood-onset compared with adult-onset patients (- 3.9 vs. - 2.0, P < 0.001). Once maintenance dosage had been achieved, the median GH requirement was significantly greater in female than male patients (1.6 vs. 0.8 IU/day, P = 0.013) and childhood-onset compared with adult-onset patients (1.6 vs. 0.8 IU/day, P = 0.019). The median maintenance GH dose for the cohort overall was 1.2 (range 0.4-2.4) IU/day. By univariate analysis a significant negative correlation was observed between the maintenance GH dose and baseline IGF-I SD (r = - 0.63, P < 0.001). No significant correlation was demonstrated between maintenance GH dose and either age or weight. Multiple linear regression analysis using age, gender, weight, time of onset of GH deficiency, peak GH to the insulin tolerance test (ITT) and baseline IGF-I SD as independent variables demonstrated baseline IGF-I SD to account for 51% of the variation in GH dose required to normalize the IGF-I SD (P < 0.001). Those patients with the lower IGF-I SD at initiation of GH therapy required the greater GH dose. None of the other variables studied significantly influenced the maintenance dose. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that the GH dose required in an individual is dependent on the serum IGF-I SD before commencement of replacement. In contrast, the severity of GH deficiency as judged by the peak GH response to an ITT was unrelated to the maintenance GH requirement. The effect of age, gender and age at onset of GH deficiency on the final GH dose are accounted for by the lower pretreatment IGF-I SD in young, female and childhood-onset patients relative to older, male and adult-onset patients, respectively.     

Assessment of serum IGF-I concentrations in the diagnosis of isolated childhood-onset GH deficiency: a proposal of the Italian Society for Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes (SIEDP/ISPED)

The diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) is based on the measurement of peak GH responses to pharmacological stimuli. Pharmacological stimuli, however, lack precision, accuracy, are not reproducible, are invasive, non-physiological and some may even be hazardous. Furthermore, different GH commercial assays used to measure GH in serum yield results that may differ considerably. In contrast to GH, IGF-I can be measured on a single, randomly-obtained blood sample. A review of the available data indicates that IGF-I measurement in the diagnosis of childhood-onset isolated GHD has a specificity of up to 100%, with a sensitivity ranging from about 70 to 90%. We suggest an algorithm in which circulating levels of IGF-I together with the evaluation of auxological data, such as growth rate and growth, may be used to assess the likelihood of GHD in pre-pubertal children.     

Insulin-like growth factor I levels during growth hormone (GH) replacement in GH-deficient adults: a gender difference

To evaluate the variation of serum IGF-1 levels during GH replacement and observe gender differences, 29 adults with GH deficiency (mean age 42.5 ± 10.1 year), were studied. Serum IGF-1 was assessed every 4 weeks during the titration period and afterwards every 3 months of GH therapy. At baseline 77.7% of women and 45.4% of men had serum baseline IGF-1 levels below the lower limit of normal age-related reference range. The time to reach the maintenance dose was lower in men than women (p < 0.05). There was an increase in IGF-1 levels after one year of GH therapy, significant only in men (p < 0.01). IGF-1 concentrations were higher in men than women (p < 0.05), at the 12th and 18th months of GH therapy. GH dose was reduced by 25% in men (p < 0.01). At the end of the study the mean GH dose was lower in men than in women (p < 0.05). The factor responsible for these findings is not known, however a possible role of androgens has been suggested.     

GH responsiveness varies during the menstrual cycle

OBJECTIVE: The GH-IGF-1 axis is affected by oestrogen. Both endogenous and exogenous oestrogen facilitates the central drive of pulsatile GH secretion. However, the effect on IGF-1 levels is more subtle, and a reduction in GH sensitivity has been proposed. The IGF generation test has confirmed reduced GH sensitivity with high doses of exogenous oestrogen. It is not known, however, whether fluctuant levels of endogenous oestrogen modify GH sensitivity. To investigate this further, women were challenged with the IGF-1 generation test at different stages of the menstrual cycle. METHODS: Nine women (age 38(6) years (mean (s.d.)) with regular menstrual cycles were recruited. An IGF-1 generation test, s.c. injection of 7 mg GH, was performed in the early-follicular (EF), periovulatory (PO) and midluteal (ML) phases. IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-3 and acid-labile subunit (ALS) levels were measured at baseline and 24 h after GH administration. RESULTS: Oestradiol levels were lower in the EF than PO or ML phases (32.6(7.8) vs 69.6(16.2) vs 66.6(23.6) pg/ml respectively (repeated measures ANOVA, P < 0.001)). Baseline IGF-1 was lower, but increment IGF-1 (peak minus baseline) was higher in the EF than PO or ML phases (baseline: 291.8(56.6) vs 335.0(55.2) vs 346.6(78.2) ng/ml (P = 0.008); increment IGF-1: 234.6(59.2) vs 194.7(37.8) vs 185.2(37.3) ng/ml (P = 0.008)). CONCLUSIONS: Increased endogenous oestrogen levels are associated with only a modestly elevated baseline IGF-1 from midcycle onward despite a previously reported twofold increase in GH secretion. In parallel with this apparent GH insensitivity, increased endogenous oestrogen levels are associated with reduction in GH sensitivity evidenced by reduction in increment IGF-1. This may have clinical implications for women with isolated GH deficiency with regular menstrual cycles on a fixed dose of GH. This possibility requires further study.     

Abnormalities of GH secretion in a young girl with Floating-Harbor syndrome

We present a 9.1-year-old girl of Calabrian (Italy) ancestry, with clinical features (cranio-facial dysmorphism, short stature with delayed bone age and speech delay) suggesting the diagnosis of Floating-Harbor syndrome (FHS). Physical examination showed: height 113.9 cm (-2.9 SD), with a parent's target of 156.2 cm (+1.0 SD), weight 20.7 kg, BMI 16.0 (-0.04 SD), and many phenotypic abnormalities: long eyelashes, large bulbous nose with broad nasal bridge, short philtrum, moderately broad mouth, tooth folding and malocclusion, posteriorly rotated ears, low posterior hair line, short neck, clinodactyly of the 5th finger and hyperextensible finger joints. Diffused hyperpigmentation and hypertrichosis with sporadic pubic terminal hairs, but neither clitoromegaly nor other signs of hyperandrogenism and/or precocious puberty, were observed (T1, P1). Carpal bone evaluation showed a delayed bone age (TW2: 5-5/10, - 3.6 yr) and the statural age/bone age ratio was 1.1. Other dysmorphic syndromes were excluded on the basis of clinical evidence, also evaluated by a computer-assisted search (P.O.S.S.U.M. version 3.5, 1992). Analysis of chromosome 22 by the FISH method, using specific probes Cos29 and Tuple1, excluded microdeletions in the region 22q11.2, typical of Velo-cardio-facial syndrome. In this case, we report the impairment of serum GH responsiveness (GH baseline values: 0.2-1.9 ng/ml) to the administration of oral 150 microg clonidine [peak 4.7 ng/ml, normal values (nv)>10 ng/ml] and oral 4 mg dexamethasone (8.1 ng/ml, nv>10 ng/ml). Moreover, the evaluation of spontaneous 24-h GH secretion (Carmeda AB, Stockholm, Sweden) showed low mean GH levels (1.75 ng/ml, nv>3.0 ng/ml), with a maximum sleep-related peak of 2.8 ng/ml. Serum IGF-1 values were in the low-normal range (80-176 ng/ml, nv 133-626 ng/ml). While in FHS the cranio-facial features minimize with advancement of age, the impairment of growth velocity is permanent and results in severe dwarfism. In our case, treatment with recombinant GH (0.10 U/kg/day), administered by a needle-free device, induced a dramatic increase of growth velocity, increasing the height from -2.8 to -1.9 SD after 18 months, thus indirectly confirming a role of GH deficiency in the pathogenesis of FHS dwarfism.     

IGF-I measurements in the monitoring of GH therapy

Growth hormone replacement therapy has been used regularly in adult Growth hormone deficiency since the availability of recombinant GH in the 1980’s. GH replacement improves quality of life, bone turnover markers, cardiovascular risk markers and adverse body composition. Originally, GH doses in replacement regimes were determined by weight and surface area and dose increases based on body composition outcomes analogous to pediatric practice. These regimens led to significant side effects related to excess GH, arthralgias, headaches and peripheral edema and IGF-I levels above the upper limit of the reference range. Newer treatment regimes therefore account for known factors affecting serum GH and IGF-I levels, i.e. age, gender, estrogen replacement and pre-treatment IGF-I levels. Monitoring is now via clinical symptomatology combined with serum total IGF-I levels, potentially this avoids excessive GH exposure and allows monitoring of compliance and dose titration. There is a lack of data relating IGF-I to biological endpoints, but analysis suggests that dose titration of IGF-I to the upper half of the age and gender related reference range is acceptable. The use of reliable IGF-I assays and extensive age and gender related reference ranges is necessary and centralized monitoring is preferable. Free IGF-I and bioavailable IGF-I measurements are available but their use in the monitoring of GH replacement remains to be determined.     

The GH/IGF-1 Axis and Heart Failure

The growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) axis regulates cardiac growth, stimulates myocardial contractility and influences the vascular system. The GH/IGF-1 axis controls intrinsic cardiac contractility by enhancing the intracellular calcium availability and regulating expression of contractile proteins; stimulates cardiac growth, by increasing protein synthesis; modifies systemic vascular resistance, by activating the nitric oxide system and regulating non-endothelial-dependent actions. The relationship between the GH/IGF-1 axis and the cardiovascular system has been extensively demonstrated in numerous experimental studies and confirmed by the cardiac derangements secondary to both GH excess and deficiency. Several years ago, a clinical non-blinded study showed, in seven patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and chronic heart failure (CHF), a significant improvement in cardiac function and structure after three months of treatment with recombinant GH plus standard therapy for heart failure. More recent studies, including a small double-blind placebo-controlled study on GH effects on exercise tolerance and cardiopulmonary performance, have shown that GH benefits patients with CHF secondary to both ischemic and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. However, conflicting results emerge from other placebo-controlled trials. These discordant findings may be explained by the degree of CHF-associated GH resistance. In conclusion, we believe that more clinical and experimental studies are necessary to exactly understand the mechanisms that determine the variable sensitivity to GH and its positive effects in the failing heart.     

Appraisal of growth hormone (GH) secretion: evaluation of a composite pharmacokinetic model that discriminates multiple components of GH input.

Criteria for a diagnosis of GH deficiency include inadequate GH secretion as assessed by provocative testing. The changes in serum GH concentration in such tests, however, do not uniformly predict treatment responses. We questioned whether the changes in serum GH have a uniform dependence among subjects on the mass of secreted GH. We simulated spontaneous GH secretory events with bolus infusions of recombinant human GH (rhGH) in 15 somatostatin-infused adult subjects. Maximum serum GH responses, the GH areas under the curve, and GH mass calculated from deconvolution techniques are all indexes of GH secretion influenced by GH clearance and distribution volume. In this group, these indexes showed a nonuniform dependence on the known GH dose. Despite somatostatin infusion, we found evidence for low level basal GH secretion with oscillatory characteristics that may have influenced the GH concentration dependence on GH dose. We then developed and evaluated a new pharmacokinetic model to account for pulsatile, basal, and oscillatory inputs to the serum GH concentration profile. The new model is comprised of three terms. The first describes plasma GH concentrations from exogenous administration of rhGH according to a one- or a two-compartment model. The second term accounts for basal GH secretion. The third is a cosinor function that describes the oscillatory pattern of basal GH. The composite pharmacokinetic model predicted plasma GH concentrations well (r2 = 0.88-0.97); pharmacokinetic and cosinor parameters had high precision and narrow 95% confidence intervals. The pharmacokinetic parameters were stable and independent. The mean values and coefficients of variance (SD/mean) of GH pharmacokinetic parameters in our 15 subjects were: clearance, 0.236 L/min (24%); volume of distribution, 3.46 L (30%); and terminal half-life, 12.3 min (37%). The values for the cosinor parameters were: basal concentration, 0.22 ng/mL (85%); amplitude, 0.758 (50%); cycle, 121 min (27%); and time shift (acrophase), 60.3 min (53.6%). During the 9-h study, clearance decreased from 0.259 +/- 0.09 to 0.214 +/- 0.06 L/min (P < 0.03), and basal concentration increased from 0.20 +/- 0.22 to 0.33 +/- 0.33 ng/mL (P < 0.5). We conclude that our model can provide useful estimates of GH pharmacokinetics in the presence of basal, oscillating, endogenous concentrations without administering a dose of radiolabeled GH. The substantial inter- and intrasubject variance in pharmacokinetic parameters between subjects negates the assumption of a uniform relationship between GH secretion and serum GH concentration and detracts from the utility of a GH concentration cut-off point in GH testing. These findings have implications to the valid appraisal of GH deficiency states, selection of rhGH treatment candidates, and physiological regulation of the GH axis.