Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital

To determine the extent to which autopsies yield unexpected findings that are relevant to the patient's death and whether cases with a high yield of such findings can be identified selectively, we studied a total of 233 autopsies at a university hospital and at a community hospital. The rates at which autopsies detected major unexpected findings whose premortem diagnosis would probably have improved survival were 11 percent at the university hospital and 12 percent at the community hospital. Major unexpected findings whose premortem diagnosis would not have prolonged survival were found in another 12 and 21 percent of cases, respectively. Pulmonary embolism and fungal infections in immuno-compromised hosts were the most common major unexpected findings. Neither we nor the patients' physicians were able to identify from the clinical data the autopsies likely to have high yields. Furthermore, the physicians' estimates of an autopsy's expected yield were similar for patients evaluated by autopsy and for matched patients who were not. We conclude that the autopsy continues to yield clinically relevant findings at a high level and that it is not currently possible to predict which cases will have high yields. Autopsies are vital to ensure the quality of medical care, and autopsy rates must be increased substantially if this role is to be fully realized.     

The autopsy as a performance measurement tool--diagnostic discrepancies and unresolved clinical questions: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 2479 autopsies from 248 institutions

OBJECTIVE: To develop a multi-institutional reference database for quality improvement purposes using the autopsy to define clinical diagnostic discrepancies and resolve clinical questions. DESIGN: Using the College of American Pathologists Q-Probes format, institutions prospectively assessed a maximum of 15 consecutive autopsies each, excluding forensic cases and stillborn infants, conducted over a 6-month period. They documented answers to clinical questions provided at autopsy and classified unexpected disease diagnoses according to a standardized system. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Hospital-based autopsies performed at 248 institutions participating in the 1993 College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Quality Improvement Program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentages of clinical questions resolved by the autopsy and percentage of autopsies with unexpected findings of graded clinical impact. RESULTS: In the aggregate database of 6427 questions from 2479 autopsies, overall 93.0% were answered by the autopsy. The 3 most common question categories were (1) identify pathology to account for clinical signs or symptoms (28.0%); (2) establish the cause of death (21.0%); and (3) confirm a clinical diagnosis (19.0%). At least one major unexpected disease finding that contributed to the patient's death was discovered in 39.7% of the total number of autopsies. There were no differences in the percentages of autopsies with these major unexpected findings when the data were stratified by institutional demographics or decedent characteristics. CONCLUSION: This multi-institutional study underscores the clinical relevance of postmortem examination in current medical practice by consistently providing answers to unresolved clinical questions and frequently revealing major unexpected findings that contributed to the patient's death. It is our strong belief that this postmortem-derived clinicopathologic information is a key indicator of effectiveness of care. Integration of this information into institutional quality improvement programs will improve system processes and clinician performance.     

Utility of autopsy in uncovering unexpected neuropathology

Autopsy rates have declined in the last several decades for a variety of reasons. The purpose of this study is to compare autopsy neuropathologic findings from 2 periods to assess the prevalence of unexpected neuropathologic findings and unexpected neuropathologic diagnoses determined to be the major cause of death. Retrospective review of autopsies with examination of the central nervous system was performed in 2007 to 2008 (n = 289) and 1984 to 1985 (n = 328). Unexpected neuropathologic diagnoses were found at autopsy in 42.4% of cases from 1984 to 1985 vs 38.8% of cases from 2007 to 2008. The neuropathology was felt to contribute to the cause of death in 22% of cases from 1984 to 1985 vs 19.7% of cases from 2007 to 2008. Unexpected neuropathologic findings were the cause of death in 5.2% of cases from 1984 to 1985 vs 3.1% of cases from 2007 to 2008. These findings underscore the continued use of brain and spinal cord examination at autopsy despite advances in "modern" medicine.     

Factors affecting autopsy rates, autopsy request rates, and autopsy findings at a large academic medical center.

Autopsy rates continue to decline in the United States. To assess the impact of various objective factors (time of death, day of death, age at death, patient gender, clinical service, and length of hospital stay) on the autopsy request rate, autopsy rate, successful request rate, and percentage of cases in which the autopsy examination added to or altered the clinical assessment of the patient, we prospectively studied all hospital deaths at a major academic medical center for the 3-year period from 1996 through 1998. The autopsy rate decreases significantly with patient age, both because of a decreasing request rate and because family members are less likely to grant permission. An autopsy is less likely to be requested for deaths in the emergency department or on general surgery services and most likely to be requested for fetal, medicine, cardiothoracic surgery, and pediatric deaths. Families more commonly grant permission for autopsy on fetal deaths, pediatric deaths, and emergency department deaths. Forty percent of autopsies reveal significant information about the patient's death beyond what was known premortem. This is least frequent among the fetal deaths, but relatively constant for adults of all ages. Patients who die in the emergency department are most likely to have significant unexpected findings at autopsy. Increasing the request rate for adult patients who die in the emergency department and on the medicine services will result in the greatest increase in information learned from autopsy.     

Resident physician opinions on autopsy importance and procurement

The national decline in hospital autopsy cases negatively impacts physician education and medical quality control to an unknown degree. The current non-medicolegal autopsy rate is less than 5% of hospital deaths. This study compares internal medicine and pathology resident physician perceptions of the autopsy, including the importance, procurement, technique, and the pathologist-internist interaction. An 84-item survey based on autopsy literature was designed, piloted, and distributed to 214 residents at a single 800+ bed tertiary care academic teaching hospital (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston) to accomplish this goal. Completed surveys were obtained from 72% of medicine (n = 118) and 84% of pathology (n = 42) residents. Residents strongly agree on the importance of autopsies for education, answering clinical questions, public health, and research. Autopsy rates are deemed inadequate. Internists are comfortable requesting autopsies, but report insufficient guidance and difficulty with answering technical questions. Although not requested on all hospital deaths, internists are more likely to initiate an autopsy request than a decedent's family, and worry significantly less about institutional costs and malpractice litigation than pathologists believe. Internists expressed interest in having an instructional brochure to give families, observing an autopsy, and having increased communication and support with autopsies from pathology residents. The main reasons why autopsy consent is not requested (it is unpleasant, cause of death is known, family is upset or seems unwilling) and why families refuse (patient has suffered enough, body may be handled disrespectfully, religious/moral objections, lack information) were similar for both resident groups. Despite their decline, autopsies still remain important to medicine as indicated by internal medicine and pathology residents at a large academic center. Improving autopsy education, enhancing availability of resources, and strengthening the pathologist-internist collaboration may serve to heighten awareness and ultimately procurement.     

The role of the autopsy in medical malpractice cases,II: controversy related to autopsy performance and reporting

CONTEXT: We studied 99 appellate court records in cases of alleged medical malpractice and found no relationship between discrepant clinical and autopsy findings and outcome of litigation. Standard-of-care issues and not diagnostic accuracy were at the heart of every case. OBJECTIVE: To characterize and discuss issues related to the autopsy and/or pathologist behavior that were raised in court records of medical malpractice litigation. DESIGN: In 18 appellate court records, issues were raised about quality of autopsy performance and reporting or about death certification. The details of these controversies are succinctly reported here in a manner intended to be instructive to pathologists who perform autopsies in a hospital setting or on a private fee-for-service basis. CONCLUSION: Autopsy reports are intended to provide objective medical information in a coherent format to the patient's medical record, to the attending physician and other concerned staff physicians, to other health care professionals, and to the families of the deceased. Inevitably, occasions arise that require legal counsel to be added to this list of parties with a legitimate interest. Our findings emphasize that incomplete, incoherent, obfuscated, or delayed reporting of autopsy findings do not meet professional standards, are unethical if intentional, and may be counterproductive.     

Unexpected autopsy findings arising from postmortem ocular examination

BACKGROUND: A full autopsy at our institution includes removal of the eyes for pathologic examination. To our knowledge, the rate of ophthalmic findings at autopsy has not been documented previously. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed 277 consecutive autopsies conducted between 1995 and 1999 in which the eyes were removed for examination. Ophthalmic findings were placed in the following categories: I, major findings included those that contributed to the patient's death, would have changed patient management, and/or may have important medical implications for close relatives; II, expected findings after ophthalmologic surgery and minor findings that may have eventually required treatment; and III, incidental findings. RESULTS: Major findings (category I) were found in 32% of autopsies. Minor findings (category II) and incidental findings (category III) were documented in 62% and 34% of autopsies, respectively. Only 14% of autopsies revealed no ophthalmologic diagnoses. CONCLUSION: In our series, postmortem ocular examination revealed a number of important findings, including several heritable and rare conditions. Eighty-six percent of autopsies disclosed at least one pathologic ophthalmologic finding, approximately one third of which demonstrated findings significant enough to have likely required management. Diabetic retinopathy was the most frequent major finding. Malignant melanoma of the choroid was the most commonly found intraocular neoplasm. Chronic uveitis was the most common minor finding. We conclude that important, often unexpected ophthalmic findings are frequently encountered at autopsy, underscoring the relevance of routine postmortem examination of the eyes.     

Autopsy and the internal medicine department.

The accuracy of major clinical diagnoses and causes of death was estimated from the analysis of clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings of patients deceased at the internal medicine department of a large university hospital in two different periods (1965-1967 and 1985-1987). The autopsy cases from the second period were subdivided in two groups i.e. less and more than seven days of hospital stay prior death. From 100 randomly selected autopsy cases in each period there was no statistically significant variability in clinico-pathological concordance. In three groups studied (1965-1967, 1985-1987 < seven days and 1985-1987 < seven days hospital stay) the major clinical diagnosis was confirmed in 85, 94 and 86% respectively. A decrease of nearly 27% in the number of autopsies performed is shown between analysed periods. Clinico-pathological conferences are regularly held weekly, this being one of the reasons for a stable and extremely high clinico-pathological concordance.     

Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review

The autopsy is in decline, despite the fact that accurate mortality statistics remain essential for public health and health service planning. The falling autopsy rate combined with the Coroners Review and Human Tissue Act have contributed to this decline, and to a falling use of autopsy histology, with potential impact on clinical audit and mortality statistics. At a time when the need for reform and improvement in the death certification process is so prominent, we felt it important to assess the value of the autopsy and autopsy histology. We carried out a meta-analysis of discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses and the contribution of autopsy histology. There has been little improvement in the overall rate of discrepancies between the 1960s and the present. At least a third of death certificates are likely to be incorrect and 50% of autopsies produce findings unsuspected before death. In addition, the cases which give rise to discrepancies cannot be identified prior to autopsy. Over 20% of clinically unexpected autopsy findings, including 5% of major findings, can be correctly diagnosed only by histological examination. Although the autopsy and particularly autopsy histology are being undermined, they are still the most accurate method of determining the cause of death and auditing accuracy of clinical diagnosis, diagnostic tests and death certification.     

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in determining cause of sudden death in adults: comparison with conventional autopsy

AIM: To determine the accuracy and define the limitations of post mortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in determining the cause of sudden death in adults. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sudden unexpected adult deaths in the community, reported to the Coroner (n = 10), excluding suspicious, violent or potentially drug-related deaths, were submitted to whole body MRI, followed by full invasive autopsy. The MRI scans were reported independently by four radiologists, blinded to the autopsy findings; two had previous experience of post mortem MRI. An abnormality that related to the cause of death as identified at autopsy, was identified by at least one radiologist in eight cases. These were pulmonary consolidation (autopsy finding pneumonia) (n = 1), pneumoperitoneum (autopsy finding perforated peptic ulcer) (n = 2), left ventricular failure (autopsy finding ischaemic heart disease) (n = 4), and disseminated bronchial carcinoma (n = 1). However, in only one case were all radiologists able to provide a confident cause of death (disseminated bronchial carcinoma). In two cases, in which death occurred 2-6 days and 3-6 days before MRI, early decomposition prevented interpretation of the images. Severe coronary artery atheroma was detected at autopsy in 7/10, but these lesions were not detected by MRI. Previous experience in reporting post mortem MRI, without autopsy comparison, did not result in more accurate interpretation of the images. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests that post mortem MRI can identify some abnormalities relating to the common causes of sudden death in adults, but there is a need for greater experience in correlating MRI with autopsy findings before a reliable cause of death can be made by MRI alone. Inability to image coronary artery lesions, differentiating thrombus from clot and pulmonary oedema from pneumonic exudates, are specific problems that may be corrected with greater experience and higher resolution scans.     

Descriptive epidemiology of the autopsy in Connecticut, 1979-1980

Knowledge of the differences between deaths for which autopsies are performed and all deaths is pertinent to epidemiologic investigation in such areas as disease trends, chronic disease incidence, and occupationally related disease. A population-based study was undertaken to evaluate these differences for deaths in Connecticut in 1979 and 1980. Analyses for 1979 and 1980 were comparable. Of 28,440 deaths in 1980, 14% underwent autopsy. Differences by sex, race, marital status, age, underlying cause of death, and place of occurrence of death were demonstrated when decedents who underwent an autopsy were compared with all decedents. Non-white men who died at 20 to 29 years of age were the most likely group to undergo an autopsy. Proportions of autopsies, by major category of underlying cause, did not parallel the leading causes of death. Deaths due to trauma accounted for a larger proportion of all autopsies (25%) than of all deaths (6%). If a death certificate indicated a circulatory disorder or neoplasm as the cause of death, an autopsy was less likely to be performed. A disproportionately high number of autopsies were performed for deaths occurring in hospitals; the converse was true for deaths occurring in nursing-convalescent homes. We conclude that knowledge of the ways in which autopsies are biased will permit broader use of the sensitive and specific information that can be obtained from them.     

Quality assurance of autopsy face sheet reporting,final autopsy report turnaround time,and autopsy rates: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 10003 autopsies from 418 institutions

OBJECTIVE: To develop a multi-institutional reference database of autopsy practice and performance for quality improvement purposes. DESIGN: In 1990, participants in the Q-Probes quality improvement program of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) each retrospectively evaluated the 25 most recently completed consecutive autopsy reports and determined the number of deaths and autopsies that occurred in their institutions during 1989. SETTING: Hospital-based autopsies excluding forensic cases and stillborn infants. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred ten institutions in the United States and eight institutions in Canada. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Completeness of face sheet information contained in final autopsy reports, turnaround time for completion of final reports, and institutional autopsy rates. RESULTS: In the aggregate database of 10003 autopsies, the following six data items (from a total of 21) were present in 95% to 100% of the final autopsy reports in at least 85% of the participating institutions: institution where autopsy was performed, patient's name, patient's sex, autopsy number, autopsy date, and prosecter's name. The turnaround times for the final autopsy reports were as follows: 30 days or less in 47.6% of the cases, 31 to 60 days in 28.8%, and more than 60 days in 23.7%. A higher median percentage of autopsy final reports were completed in 30 days or less in institutions with the following characteristics: nonteaching (P < .004), no pathology residency program (P < .002), and rural location (P < .027). A lower number of autopsies performed in 1989 was associated with a higher median percentage of final reports completed in 30 days or less (P < .007). The aggregate autopsy rate for all participating institutions was 12.4%, and the median rate was 8.3%. Median autopsy rates for teaching institutions and institutions with pathology residency training programs were 15% and 19%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-institutional study identified a core group of face sheet data items that were consistently present on final autopsy reports. However, the majority of the face sheet data items examined were inconsistently recorded. Approximately 75% of final autopsy report turnaround times were within the standard established by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Nearly two thirds of the institutions reported autopsy rates for 1989 of 0% to 10%.     

Concordance between premortem and postmortem diagnosis in the autopsy: results of a 10-year study in a tertiary care center

We describe the concordance between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in a tertiary care center. Clinical autopsy is a useful tool for the evaluation of accuracy of the clinical diagnoses. However, autopsy rates have declined around the world recently. We randomly evaluated 500 of 2,211 autopsies performed in the department of pathology of a tertiary care hospital during a 10-year period. We computed the sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and concordance scores between premortem and postmortem diagnoses. The autopsy diagnoses were used as the "gold standard." Four-hundred twenty-two (84.4%) of the autopsies met inclusion criteria. Diseases of the respiratory tract were diagnosed in 44.1% (186) of all autopsy reports reviewed. The higher sensitivity for diagnosis was observed in congenital anomalies (87.5%), while the higher specificity was observed in diagnosis of complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium (98.98%). The higher concordance between premortem and postmortem diagnosis was observed with the diagnoses of neoplasms (kappa = 0.76), and for the group of complications of pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium (kappa = 0.76). A clinical diagnosis successfully addressed the cause of death in 40% of the cases Low values for concordance between autopsy reports and clinical diagnoses were present in most of the autopsies reports reviewed. We encourage physicians to continue considering the autopsy as an important tool that extends our understanding of diseases.     

Immunohistochemistry utilization in autopsy pathology: a Canadian experience

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an important part of the diagnostic work-up in surgical pathology, but the use of IHC in autopsy pathology is poorly defined. We measured IHC utilization by pathologists performing 609 consecutive non-medicolegal, hospital-based, adult autopsies over a three-year period. IHC requests on non-neurologic and neurologic material were analyzed separately. Total stains, number of tissue blocks, specific antibody requests, resident trainee involvement, and ordering pathologist were recorded. For all autopsies on which IHC was requested, the final autopsy report was reviewed. IHC was requested on 345 cases (57%), and a total of 4612 stains were performed (mean 13.5 per autopsy). For non-neurologic autopsy tissues, IHC was used most commonly for the accurate diagnosis of malignancy. For neuropathologic autopsy examinations, IHC was employed most commonly to exclude neurodegenerative conditions and correlate ante-mortem clinical neurologic findings. Resident involvement did not significantly impact utilization. Individual pathologists demonstrated a wide variation in IHC utilization. We conclude that IHC is used extensively in Canadian non-medicolegal autopsy pathology reflecting the complexity, extent, and severity of disease in patients dying in a tertiary-care, academic hospital setting. Utilization is strongly influenced by the neuropathology component of these autopsies. The results provide a point of reference for IHC utilization in autopsy pathology.     

The autopsy and cancer

The autopsy plays an important role in neoplastic disease. Over one third of all adult autopsies disclose cancer, and clinical diagnostic errors are disclosed in approximately 40% of these. There is no evidence that diagnostic accuracy has improved in recent years. In addition to monitoring diagnostic accuracy--particularly with reference to new technologies--the autopsy is also important in detecting both new types of cancer and new causative agents and patterns of incidence and behavior in "old" types of cancer. It also plays a major role in characterizing the toxic effects of new therapeutic regimens and in establishing true causes of death (including accurate primary cancer sites) for setting local, national, and international research and health care priorities.     

The medicolegal autopsy

Considerable disparity exists from area to area in the United States in the quality of medicolegal investigation. Much of this type of investigation in this country is still conducted by physicians in general practice, who possess neither specialized medicolegal training nor experience. Forensic autopsies are being performed mostly by hospital pathologists without forensic expertise, who conduct these autopsies in their spare time or as a paid hobby. This article provides guidelines for improved medicolegal investigation and formulation of autopsy reports, including opinions, which have been found to be advantageous in a medicolegal setting of a major metropolitan area and are, in my opinion, also applicable to smaller, even rural, types of jurisdiction.     

Correlation of clinical diagnoses with autopsy findings: A retrospective study of 2,145 consecutive autopsies

The protocols of 2,145 autopsies were retrospectively reviewed and the findings compared with the clinical diagnoses. A sudden decline in the autopsy rate that occurred during the period studied was followed by a highly statistically significant difference in clinical accuracy (P less than 0.01), in favor of the predecline period. The overall rate of major discrepancies was 29 per cent. The most frequently missed diagnoses were infections, which were found in 26 per cent of all autopsies and had not been diagnosed clinically in 63 per cent of these cases. Malignancies occupied second place among overlooked diagnoses in the selected disease categories; in 99 per cent of the cases the malignancy was the principal diagnosis, and it had been misdiagnosed clinically in 42 per cent of these cases. Cerebrovascular disorders were correctly diagnosed in most cases (87 per cent of the patients in this group). Among autopsy diagnoses labeled as the immediate causes of death, the most frequently overlooked were pulmonary embolism and gastrointestinal hemorrhage, which were not recognized in 84 and 78 per cent, respectively. In cases in which clinicians were not entirely confident in their impressions, their diagnoses were usually confirmed at autopsy. In these cases 15 per cent of the patients died soon after admission to the hospital, with accurate diagnoses in 71 per cent. The discrepancies disclosed should be regarded as sufficiently large to mandate continued emphasis on autopsy evaluation as the basis for the control of the quality of patient care.     

A retrospective study of the accuracy between clinical and autopsy cause of death in the University of Malaya Medical Centre

It is well known that diagnostic accuracy of the clinical cause of death has not improved despite advances in diagnostic techniques. We aimed to investigate the accuracy of the clinical cause of death compared with the autopsy cause of death and to see if the Coroner's autopsy can play a role in clinical audit. Our study population consisted of all autopsies where the deceased was hospitalised or resuscitated at the Accident and Emergency Unit of the University of Malaya Medical Centre before death, performed during the period July 1998 to June 2000. The cases were subdivided according to natural and unnatural causes of deaths. Natural deaths were further subdivided in relation to the main organ systems involved while unnatural deaths were subcategorised into trauma, poisoning and burns. The rate of agreement between clinical and autopsy cause of death was further compared with duration of survival in the hospital. Of 132 autopsies included in this study, 115 were Coroner's autopsies. 78% of cases showed agreement between clinical and autopsy cause of death. The agreement rate in Coroner's cases was 80.0%. For natural and unnatural causes, the agreement rate was 56.7% and 84.3% respectively. There were 6 cases (4.5%) where an initial accurate diagnosis might have altered the prognosis of the deceased. In general, the rate of agreement increased with duration of survival of patients. However, this was no longer observed after a survival of more than 28 days. Our findings agree with other similar studies. The diagnostic accuracy of cause of death has not improved despite the modernisation in medical technology. The autopsy still plays an important role in clinical audit and medical education.     

Discrepancies in initial death certificate diagnoses in sudden unexpected out-of-hospital deaths: the role of cardiovascular autopsy

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of death certificates issued for out-of-hospital sudden deaths has been questioned. METHODS: We retrospectively studied a series of consecutive autopsies performed at two community hospitals. RESULTS: Fifty-four autopsies in which the deaths were sudden and that occurred outside the hospital were retained for study. The indication for autopsy was largely driven by the wishes of family or physician who was uncertain about the diagnosis. The overall discrepancy rate was 52%. The death certificate diagnosis, rendered before autopsy, was coronary artery disease in 44/54 autopsies (81%). At autopsy, coronary artery disease was the cause of death in 26 cases (48%), cardiomyopathy in 10 (18%), ruptured aneurysm in 8 (15%), pulmonary embolism in 7 (13%), and valve disease in 3 (6%). The diagnosis of coronary artery disease on the death certificate was accurate only 50% of the time. The discrepancy rate was lowest in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease (33%) and was 60% in patients with no prior medical history. The accuracy rate of death certificates was under one third in cases of cardiomyopathy, valve disease, ruptured aneurysm, pulmonary embolism, and valve disease. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in a highly selected group of sudden deaths, in which there was often a question about cause of death, the rate of initial death certificate accuracy is only one half. Furthermore, coronary artery disease as the cause of death is less than 50%, far less than initial death certificate diagnoses would indicate.     

The autopsy. The ultimate audit

Four hundred twenty-eight autopsy cases were reviewed at a departmental conference over a 4 1/2-year period. All diagnostic test data were discussed before the results of the autopsies were known, and the participants tried to extract the maximum diagnostic information from the clinical findings and the test data. Fifty-two percent of the autopsy cases failed to provide any additional major insight; premortem clinical and laboratory findings were sufficient for diagnosis. In the remaining 48%, however, the autopsies contributed to the improvement of medical care.