精子畸形程度对常规体外受精-胚胎移植治疗的影响

目的 探讨精子畸形程度对常规体外受精(IVF)-胚胎移植治疗的影响. 方法 2007-2008年接受常规体外受精-胚胎移植105对夫妇男方精液进行分析,按精子正常形态百分率分为3组,正常精子形态组(精子正常形态≥15%)54例、轻度畸形精子组(精子正常形态10%～15%)26例、中度畸形精子组(精子正常形态5%～10%)25例,观察精子畸形程度对IVF受精率、卵裂率、优质胚胎率、着床率、妊娠率及流产率的影响. 结果①精子形态正常组与轻度畸形组受精率(79.4%与78.3%)、卵裂率(104.6%与98.6%)、优质胚胎率(58.1%与53.9%)、植入率(31.7%与30.8%)、妊娠率(48.1%与42.3%)及流产率(13.0%与18.2%)比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).②精子形态正常组与中度畸形组受精率(63.9%)、优质胚胎率(48.2%)、植入率(16.7%)、妊娠率(24.0%)比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).而卵裂率(102.9%)、流产率(28.6%)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).③轻度畸形组与中度畸形组受精率、优质胚胎率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),植入率(30.8%与16.7%)、妊娠率(42.3%与24.0%)、卵裂率(98.6%与102.9%)、流产率(18.2%与28.6%)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 中度畸形精子患者常规IVF受精率、优质胚胎率、植入率和妊娠率有一定影响;轻度畸形精子对常规IVF影响不大.     

不育男性精子形态与体外受精妊娠结局的相关性研究

目的 探讨不育男性精子形态与体外受精妊娠结局的关系.方法 按照WHO《人类精液及精子-宫颈粘液相互作用实验室检验手册》要求对573例接受辅助生殖技术治疗的男性不育患者的精子形态进行分析,根据患者正常精子形态百分比分为2组(＜1 5％:≥1 5％),分别采用体外受精(IVF)或卵泡浆内单精子注射(ICSI)的受精方式,观察精子形态对IVF及ICSI的受精率、卵裂率、优质胚胎率、妊娠率和流产率等的影响.结果采用IVF(327例)受精方式下,两形态组精子的受精率、卵裂率、优质胚胎率和妊娠率差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05),但流产率差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);而采用ICSI(246例)受精方式下,两形态组精子的上述指标比较差异均无统计学意义(P＞ 0.05).结论不育男性精子形态异常影响IVF治疗结局,但对ICSI治疗结局无影响,对于精子形态异常的患者应采用ICSI的受精方式.     

不同受精方式对100%畸形精子症患者临床结局影响的比较

目的:回顾性分析100%畸形精子症患者的临床资料,比较常规IVF受精和ICSI受精的临床结局,旨在探讨ICSI是否改善100%畸形精子症患者的临床结局。方法:选择本院生殖中心152对IVF-ET治疗夫妇,其中常规IVF新鲜移植周期75例,ICSI新鲜移植周期77例。比较两组间的正常受精率、优胚率、可用胚胎率、种植率、临床妊娠率及流产率等指标,并对正常形态精子百分率为0%(n=75)与正常形态精子百分率为1%~4%(n=808)行常规IVF的临床结局进行比较。结果:100%畸形精子症IVF组的可用胚胎率显著低于ICSI组(78.91%vs 84.92%,P0.05),正常受精率(60.26%vs 57.87%,P0.05)和种植率(48.00%vs 39.55%,P0.05)稍高于ICSI组,但差异无统计学意义。两组间的女方年龄、促性腺激素注射天数、促性腺激素注射总量、体质指数、不育年限、子宫内膜厚度、基础卵泡雌激素值和基础血清雌激素值均无显著性差异。结论:ICSI技术不能改善男方100%畸形精子症患者的临床结局。     

精子畸形率对体外受精-胚胎移植治疗结局的影响

目的回顾性分析我中心接受常规体外受精（IVF）及卵胞浆内单精子注射（ICSI）治疗中,男方精子畸形率对受精率、胚胎质量及临床结局的影响。方法选取本中心2008年9月至2010年5月接受IVF的344对及ICSI的178对夫妇,分为常规IVF组和ICSI组,组内按照男方精子畸形率分为正常形态组（IVF266／ICSI76）和畸精子症组（IVF78／ICSI102）。受精后分别统计IVF及ICSI两组内畸精子症组和正常形态组正常受精率、优质胚胎率、种植率、临床妊娠率及流产率的差别。结果在IVF中,畸精子症组和正常形态组的正常受精率、种植率、临床妊娠率及流产率分别为64．32％／60．09％、33．78％／37．02％、42．03％／54．62％及12．5％／4．23％。两组间受精率无显著性差别,畸精子症组的临床妊娠率显著性低于正常形态组,而早期流产率显著高于正常形态组（P〈0．05）;ICSI组中,畸精子症组和正常形态组的正常受精率、种植率、临床妊娠率及流产率分别为68．01％／64．59％、32．26％／33．78％、43．75％／52．63％及4．76％／5％。畸精子症患者的临床妊娠率较正常组显著性降低（P〈0．05）。将两种受精方式的畸精子症组间比较,IVF的患者早孕流产率显著高于ICSI者（P〈0.05）。结论常规IVF中畸精子症不影响正常受精。对于畸精症子患者,其临床妊娠率均较精子形态正常组低,但是采用ICSI治疗可以显著降低早孕流产率。‘     

卵细胞胞质内单精子注射对体外受精能力缺陷的改善

目的:评价前一周期行体外受精(IVF)失败和受精率低后,改行卵细胞胞质内单精子注射(ICSI)的受精效果。方法:行ICSI治疗的113例患者136周期分为两组:因严重少弱精子症而行ICSI的106个周期(组1);因前次常规IVF受精失败或受精率低于20%而改行ICSI的30个周期(组2)。比较两组间卵母细胞的正常受精率、优质胚胎率和妊娠率的差异,并对第2组受精率的分布进行分析,以了解改行ICSI后受精效果的改善情况。结果:改行ICSI后,两组的正常受精率和优质胚胎率差异均无显著性(70.49%vs72.02%;38.28%vs38.81%)(P>0.05)。两组的临床妊娠率分别为40.57%和40.00%,差异也无显著性(P>0.05)。改行ICSI后,大部分周期(70.00%,21/30)的受精率都在50%以上,平均受精率为79.79%,受精效果得到明显改善。结论:IVF受精失败和受精率低可以通过行ICSI而获得较好结局。     

精子形态对体外受精-胚胎移植治疗结局及新生儿的影响

目的:探讨正常形态精子百分率对体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)治疗结局及新生儿的影响。方法:采用WHO严格标准法将精液标本分为3组:中度畸形组:正常形态精子百分率5%～10%,轻度畸形组:10%<正常形态精子百分率<15%,正常组:正常形态精子百分率≥15%,比较各组间正常受精率、卵裂率、优质胚胎率、种植率、临床妊娠率及新生儿情况。结果:各组间患者年龄(男、女方)差异不显著(P>0.05);中度畸形组正常受精率显著低于轻度畸形组(63.70%vs73.74%,P<0.05),但与正常组差异无统计学意义(63.70%vs68.05%,P>0.05);正常组的优质胚胎率最高,显著高于中度畸形组(44.83%vs35.75%,P<0.05),其他各指标3组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);280个移植周期共分娩125个婴儿,其中单胎分娩73例,双胎分娩26例,出生婴儿未见先天异常,3组间流产率、异位妊娠率、孕周、早产率、出生体重差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:正常形态精子百分率为5%～10%对常规体外受精的受精率无影响,但显著降低优质胚胎率,而10%<正常形态精子百分率<15%对常规体外受精治疗结局的各项指标均无明显影响;正常形态精子百分率在预测IVF-ET的助孕结局及新生儿情况方面存在一定局限性。     

睾丸精子行ICSI改善严重畸形精子症患者治疗结局5例报告

目的:探讨利用睾丸精子行卵细胞胞质内单精子注射(ICSI)治疗严重畸形精子症患者(精液或附睾液精子畸形率≥99%)的可行性,改善辅助生殖技术治疗结局。方法:回顾性分析5例严重畸形症精子患者(附睾液精子,n=4;精液精子,n=1)利用不同来源精子行ICSI治疗的临床资料,并比较睾丸精子组与非睾丸精子组(附睾液精子和精液精子)之间受精率、卵裂率、优质胚胎率、妊娠率以及种植率的差异。结果:5例严重畸形精子症患者取精液精子或附睾液精子行ICSI治疗后无1例妊娠,而改用睾丸精子行ICSI治疗后4例成功妊娠。睾丸精子组与非睾丸精子组之间受精率、卵裂率及优质胚胎率均无显著差异(P>0.05),而睾丸精子组妊娠率和种植率均显著高于非睾丸精子组(P<0.01)。结论:对应用附睾精子或精液精子行ICSI治疗失败的严重畸形精子症患者改用睾丸精子治疗可有效改善其治疗结局。     

精子形态对体外受精结局的影响

目的探讨精子形态对常规体外受精(IVF)及单精子卵胞浆内注射(ICSI)周期的受精率、卵裂率、优胚率及妊娠率的影响。方法将2011年6月至2014年6月在我院行IVF/ICSI治疗的周期根据精子形态进行分组:IVF周期分为A组(正常精子形态2%),B组(2%≤正常精子形态4%),C组(正常精子形态≥4%);ICSI周期分为D组(正常精子形态2%),E组(2%≤正常精子形态4%),F组(正常精子形态≥4%),分别比较各组间受精率、卵裂率、优胚率及妊娠率的差异。结果 IVF周期中C组受精率显著高于B组和A组,差异具统计学意义(P0.05),卵裂率、优胚率及妊娠率在A、B、C组之间则无显著性差异(P0.05);ICSI周期中D组、E组、F组受精率、卵裂率、优胚率及妊娠率无显著性差异(P0.05)。结论畸形精子症会影响IVF周期的受精率,对ICSI周期的受精率无显著性影响。     

获单卵或双卵周期体外受精方式对治疗结局的影响

目的比较常规体外受精(IVF)和卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)两种授精方式对周期获卵数仅为1～2个患者的治疗结局的影响。方法回顾性分析胚胎移植(ET)168个周期获卵数仅为1～2个的卵巢低反应患者的资料,比较常规IVF组和ICSI组的受精率、卵裂率、优质胚胎率和临床妊娠率等情况。结果ICSI组受精率高于IVF组(分别为83.7%和63.8%,P0.05);IVF组有24.5%周期的卵子全部不受精,高于ICSI组的9.7%(P0.05);而卵裂率、优质胚胎率、取消移植周期率和临床妊娠率两组间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。≥35岁、精液参数不正常时,ICSI组受精率高于IVF组(分别为83.9%和55.6%,P0.05);IVF组有34.8%周期的卵子全部不受精,高于ICSI组的14.3%(P0.05);而卵裂率、优质胚胎率、取消移植周期率和临床妊娠率,两组间差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。≥35岁、精液参数正常时及35岁、精液参数正常或不正常时受精率、卵裂率、优质胚胎率、取消移植周期率和临床妊娠率,两组间的差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论鉴于获卵数为1～2个的周期采用ICSI治疗并不能提高其优质胚胎率、临床妊娠率。因此我们不建议全部行ICSI治疗,男方精液参数正常或处于临界状态建议行IVF治疗。     

异常形态精子对植入前胚胎发育和妊娠结局的影响

目的探讨异常形态精子(畸形率≥98%)对植入前胚胎发育及妊娠结局的影响。方法采用回顾性队列研究,分析2017年1~12月在唐都医院妇产科生殖医学中心行ART助孕的2419例患者临床资料,根据异常形态精子分为3组,即IVF对照组(畸形率≤96%,n=2129)、IVF实验组(畸形率≥98%,n=90)和ICSI实验组(畸形率≥98%,n=200)。比较3组间植入前受精失败率(受精率<30%)、正常受精率、可用胚胎率等胚胎发育参数和着床率、临床妊娠率、流产率及活产率等妊娠结局的差异。结果(1)胚胎发育结果:组间比较,IVF实验组受精失败率显著高于IVF对照组(P<0.05),ICSI实验组的受精失败率为0;ICSI实验组正常受精率显著高于IVF对照组和IVF实验组(P<0.05);IVF实验组可用胚胎率显著低于IVF对照组和ICSI实验组(P<0.05)。(2)妊娠结局:单因素分析结果显示,与IVF对照组、ICSI实验组相比,IVF实验组的着床率、临床妊娠率、流产发生率和活产率差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);IVF对照组和ICSI实验组组间妊娠结局指标比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。(3)Logistic多因素分析显示:IVF实验组的受精失败风险显著高于IVF对照组(P=0.002),可用胚胎率、活产率显著低于IVF对照组(P=0.002);ICSI实验组的正常受精率显著高于IVF对照组(P=0.05)。结论对于活力正常、但异常形态精子率≥98%的患者,采用ICSI授精方式,能降低受精失败风险,提高正常受精率和可用胚胎率,同时提高妊娠率和活产率并降低流产发生率。     

Prognostic value of male diagnostic profiles in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)

Possible correlations between male hormone and semen parameters with pregnancy and oocyte fertilization rates following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were investigated. The study is based on 290 couples who underwent ICSI therapy for the first time. The parameters evaluated were male age, serum levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and testosterone, sperm concentration, sperm motility, normal sperm morphology, index of teratozoospermia (TZI) and sperm vitality. A marginal, barely significant association was found between the fertilization rate and serum FSH levels in the male partner ( p =  0.046). There was no relevant association between male parameters and pregnancy rates. The study confirms that male hormonal and semen parameters are of low prognostic value for the outcome of ICSI.     

Predictive value of semen parameters in in vitro fertilisation pregnancy outcome

This study investigated retrospectively the predictive value of routine semen analysis in pregnancy by in vitro fertilisation (IVF). The selected (n = 796) cycles were divided into two groups: pregnancy group (group 1; n = 264) and nonpregnancy group (group 2; n = 532), in which the female partners were normal or just had tube problems. No significant differences were found in the percentage of normal sperm morphology, sperm motility, sperm progressive motility, rapid progressive motility (rapid) and concentration between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, teratozoospermic index (TZI) and sperm deformity index (SDI) showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05). The number of retrieved eggs (P = 0.001), fertilisation rate (P = 0.000) and number of embryos transferred (P = 0.020) in group 1 were significantly higher than those in group 2, but no significant differences were noted in cleavage rates, and good quality embryo rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). Using receiver operating characteristics curve, we found that semen parameters (morphology, motility and concentration), fertilisation rate, TZI and SDI were not good indicators for pregnancy by IVF. Thus, the semen parameters evaluated according to criteria of the World Health Organization are no good predictors for accurately identifying the IVF outcome. However, TZI and SDI may be more informative than other semen parameters.     

Evaluation and assessment of semen for IVF/ICSI

Evaluation and assessment of semen is very important for both diagnosis of male infertility and selection of patients for treatment with IVF or ICSI. In standard IVF, sperm function is essential for normal fertilization: sperm must be able to bind to zona pellucida (ZP), undergo the acrosome reaction and penetrate the ZP and fuse with the oolemma before fertilization takes place. In contrast, most sperm functions are not required for fertilization in ICSI since sperm bypass the ZP and oolemma by injection of a single sperm directly into cytoplasm of oocyte. Therefore, the clinical decision on treatment of patients with either IVF or ICSI is mostly dependent on results of sperm tests. However, conventional semen analyses do not provide accurate information about sperm fertilizing ability since many patients with subtle sperm defects can not be detected. More advanced sperm function tests are required to detect sperm defects that may lead to failure of fertilization in standard IVF. In the last 15 years w     

精子功能检测与男性不育诊治的新进展

传统的精液常规分析是用于判断男性生育力的最基本临床指标,但是,只依靠精液分析的结果来预测男性生育状况仍是很不准确的。精子功能正常与否,对临床选择IVF还是ICSI治疗不育症极为重要。因为IVF需要功能完全正常的精子才能受精,而ICSI的受精只需要精子的正常核DNA,不需要其它的精子功能。在发明ICSI以前,患者IVF受精失败或低下(<30%)发生率很高(20%~35%)。研究证明,这些IVF受精失败的患者主要与精子功能障碍有关。常见的是少精子症,弱精子症和畸形精子症。但是有很多患者,精液分析结果仍正常。为了提高临床对精子功能测定的准确性,文献里有很多新的精子功能试验的研究报导,比如丫啶橙(AO)测定精子DNA、精子与透明带结合和穿透、顶体诱发精子顶体反应和精子与透明质酸结合试验。精子形态测定是常规精液分析中最重要的临床指标之一。但精子形态又是最难测定准确和稳定。IVF/ICSI受精失败的人卵可以用来测定精子功能。人卵透明带选择性地与正常形态和顶体完整的精子结合,透明带诱发的顶体反应与精子穿透明带的能力有很强的相关性。在不明原因的男性不育患者中,由于透明带诱发顶体反应障碍所导致的不育症占25%左右。少精子症(精子计数<2×106/ml)和严重精子形态畸形症(严格正常形态<5%)的男性不育患者,精子-透明带结合反应缺陷的发生率很高(>70%)。这类患者用IVF治疗受精率会很低,因此只能用ICSI治疗。精子与透明质酸结合试验与精子活力和形态有很强的相关性,但它不是很有用的精子功能试验。AO测定精子DNA对预测ART的受精和妊娠率的临床意义目前还没有肯定的结论,需要进一步研究。总之,在常规精液分析时,增加一些新的精子功能试验,在临床ART中对男性不育患者的诊治会有很大的帮助。     

Individual assessment of sperm morphology of single spermatozoa used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is an integral part of assisted reproduction. Although many papers have shown that global sperm count, sperm motility and sperm morphology of the ejaculate play no role in the fertilization rate after ICSI, embryologists who carry out ICSI, try to use the 'best looking' spermatozoa. The aim of the study was to investigate whether those spermatozoa with the best morphology really achieve the highest fertilization rate. In the present study, a total of 798 spermatozoa used for ICSI were documented by high-resolution photo. After ICSI the oocytes were cultured in single droplets and the formation of pronuclei was assessed 16 h later. The spermatozoa (all normal according to WHO criteria) were classified into four groups of different morphology. Group 1: normal head shape (approximately 5 microm diameter), group 2: like group 1, but with 15-20% smaller diameter, group 3: like group 1, but with 15-20% larger diameter, and group 4: like group 1, but with slight mid-piece cytoplasmic irregularities. Using the Pearson chi-square test, no significant difference in terms of fertilization was found among the different groups, showing that marginal sperm differences do not alter the fertilization process in ICSI.     

常规IVF完全/部分受精失败后行早期补救ICSI的应用

目的探讨常规短时受精联合早期补救卵胞浆内单精子注射(R-ICSI)在常规体外受精(IVF)失败和低受精率周期中的临床应用效果。方法回顾性分析2012年1月至2017年12月在河北省生殖医学中心接受IVF/ICSI-ET助孕治疗的2811个周期的临床资料,根据受精方式不同分为3组:R-ICSI组(210个周期):实施早期R-ICSI;IVF组(2062个周期):行常规IVF助孕;ICSI组(539个周期):直接行ICSI助孕。比较3组患者的一般情况、实验室指标和妊娠结局。结果R-ICSI组的原发不育比例显著高于IVF组(P<0.05),但与ICSI组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。3组患者的平均获卵数、移植胚胎数及MⅡ率比较均无显著性差异(P>0.05);R-ICSI组患者的受精率显著高于IVF组和ICSI组(P<0.05);R-ICSI组患者的2PN率显著低于ICSI组(P<0.05),但与IVF组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05);R-ICSI组的多PN率显著高于ICSI组,但显著低于IVF组(P<0.05);R-ICSI组患者的优胚率、可利用胚胎率及临床妊娠率均显著低于IVF组和ICSI组(P<0.05);R-ICSI组患者的着床率显著低于IVF组(P<0.05),但与ICSI组比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论常规IVF受精失败及低受精的患者行早期R-ICSI可有效克服受精障碍,提高受精率,获得较好的妊娠结局。     

Seminal reactive oxygen species as predictors of fertilization, embryo quality and pregnancy rates after conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection

High seminal reactive oxygen species (ROS) are related to poor semen quality and impaired fertilization. We aimed at finding whether there is an association between ROS and fertilization, embryo quality and pregnancy rates after conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In prepared semen of 147 male partners of infertile couples, ROS were assessed with luminol chemiluminescence. Spermiogram was assessed in native semen. ROS were negatively correlated with standard sperm characteristics and testicular volume, and positively with abnormal sperm head morphology. Fertilization rate and embryo morphology on day 2 and on day 4 were assessed in 41 IVF and 106 ICSI cycles. The influence of maternal (female age and number of oocytes) and paternal (sperm motility, morphology and ROS) factors on fertilization and embryo quality were assessed by means of regression analyses. After IVF, fertilization and pregnancy rates were negatively associated with ROS level (p = 0.031 and 0.041, respectively). In case of higher ROS, significantly fewer ICSI-derived embryos (p = 0.036) reached the morula-blastocyst stage on day 4. High seminal ROS levels are associated with impaired sperm fertilizing ability and lower pregnancy rates after IVF. In ICSI, a negative association of ROS with embryo development to the blastocyst stage has been observed.     

Comparison of sibling oocyte outcomes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization in severe teratozoospermic patients in the first cycle

To follow up the outcome of sibling oocytes subjected to both conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the first cycles of severe teratozoospermic patients with normal sperm morphology (NSM)or=6 cell embryos on day 3 and blastocyst formation on days 5 and 6, did not differ significantly between the two groups. There was a trend towards a high pregnancy rate cycle in mixed ICSI/IVF embryo transfer (ET) (49.1%). In conclusion, this study showed that in couples with only severe teratozoospermia, there was a benefit in subjecting sibling oocytes to both IVF and ICSI in the first cycle because 24 (28.2%) cycles of total fertilization failure were avoided. Furthermore, despite initially significant higher fertilization rates in ICSI than IVF oocytes, subsequent rates of development from >or=6 cells up to blastocyst stage were the same suggesting that ICSI should be used with caution, as after day 3, ICSI-derived embryo development was compromised compared with IVF.     

Computer-assisted assessment of sperm morphology: comparison with conventional techniques

The aim of the present study was to compare conventional and computer-assisted morphology assessment of spermatozoa. Sixty-two semen samples from patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and 40 samples from patients undergoing an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were studied using both techniques. The percentage of normal spermatozoa found was closely correlated between the techniques (r=0.788, p < 0.0001). The intra-operator variation was low for both techniques but the inter-operator variation was much higher with the conventional than with the computer-assisted method (coefficient of variation = 0.43 vs. 0.08, respectively, for conventional and computer-assisted assessments). The percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology, as well as sperm motility, was significantly enhanced after PureSperm preparation, whatever the method used for assessment. In the IVF study, fertilization rate was poorly correlated with sperm morphology using both methods. However, combined with motility, morphology assessed with the computer allowed discrimination of two groups of patients with significantly different fertilization rates (30.5 +/- 5.4% vs. 63.1 +/- 5.4%, p < 0.0001). In contrast, the fertilization rate in ICSI was influenced neither by sperm morphology nor by motility. In conclusion, computer-assisted assessment of sperm morphology has a slightly better predictive value for ART than conventional assessment, but above all is much more reproducible, allowing standardization.