Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications

The objective of this study was a comparison of a full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system and a conventional screen-film mammography (SFM) system with respect to the detectability of simulated small masses and microcalcifications in the magnification mode. All images were obtained using 1.8 times magnification. The FFDM images were obtained at radiation dose levels of 1.39, 1.0, 0.7, 0.49 and 0.24 times that of the SFM images. A contrast-detail phantom was used to compare the detection of simulated lesions using a four alternative forced-choice reader study with three readers. The correct observation ratio (COR) was calculated as the fraction of correctly identified lesions to the total number of simulated lesions. Soft-copy reading was performed for all digital images. Direct magnification images acquired with the digital system showed a lower object contrast threshold than those acquired with the conventional system. For equal radiation dose, the digital system provided a significantly increased COR (0.95) compared with the screen-film system (0.82). For simulated microcalcifications, the corresponding difference was 0.90 to 0.72. The digital system allowed equal detection to screen-film at 40% of the radiation dose used for screen film. Digital magnification images are superior to screen-film magnification images for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications even at a lower radiation dose.     

计算机辅助检测对检出乳腺X线片中成簇微钙化灶的价值

目的:探讨计算机辅助检测系统(CAD)对检出乳腺X线钼靶摄影片中成簇微钙化灶的临床应用价值。方法:将22例乳腺X线钼靶片上疑有簇状钙化灶患者和13例正常对照者的140张乳腺钼靶X线片,经专业扫描仪数字化处理后,应用CAD软件标记其中的微钙化灶,由6位放射科医师分别单独阅片,再结合CAD阅片,结果采用受试者操作特性(ROC)曲线法进行分析。结果:6位放射科医师结合CAD阅片后,评价效果均优于未结合CAD时,其中3位低年资医师(有1年临床经验)和1位中年资医师(有5年以上临床经验)的两次评价结果有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:CAD有助于提高乳腺X线片中成簇微钙化灶的检出率,尤其对缺少诊断经验医师的作用更大。     

Differentiation of benign and malignant breast microcalcifications: mammography versus mammography-sonography combination

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic contribution of high-frequency sonography in the diagnosis of isolated clustered microcalcifications detected by mammography. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 238 women (aged 3198) with isolated clustered microcalcifications were examined by mammography and subsequently by high frequency sonography (13 MHz) at the site of microcalcification. 170 underwent surgery. 94 were affected by cancer and 76 by benign pathology. The other 68 were considered to have benign microcalcifications after three years follow-up. The ROC statistical technique was employed to compare the diagnostic role of mammography alone versus the combination of mammography and sonography. The area under the ROC curves was calculated by the Wilcoxon method, without any hypothesis on the distribution of the statistical data. RESULTS: The microcalcifications were neoplastic in 39.5% of cases. The difference between the areas under the mammography ROC curve (area = 0.807, standard error = 0.03) and the mammography-sonography ROC curve (area = 0.819, standard error = 0.028) was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The higher sensitivity of mammography-sonography combination demonstrates that it may be useful to perform sonography following mammography when mammography yields a diagnosis of non malignant pathology.     

Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen- film, and digitized film display

Pulverized bone specks and aluminum oxide specks were measured by hand into sizes ranging from 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm and then arranged in clusters. These clusters were superimposed on a human breast tissue phantom, and xeromammograms and screen-film mammograms of the clusters were made. The screen-film mammograms were digitized using a high-resolution laser scanner and then displayed on cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors. Six radiologists independently counted the microcalcifications on the xeromammograms, the screen-film mammograms, and the digitized-film mammograms. The xeromammograms were examined with a magnifying glass; the screen-film images were examined with a magnifying glass and by hot light; and the digitized-film images were examined by electronic magnification and image processing. The bone speck size that corresponded to a mean 50% detectability level for each technique was as follows: xeromammography, 0.550 mm; digitized film, 0.573 mm; and screen-film, 0.661 mm. We postulate that electronic magnification and image processing with edge enhancement can improve the capability of screen-film mammography to enhance the detection of microcalcifications.     

Evaluation of a wavelet-based computer-assisted detection system for identifying microcalcifications in digital full-field mammography

PURPOSE: To evaluate a new wavelet-based computer-assisted detection (CAD) system for detecting and enhancing microcalcifications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 280 mammograms acquired by full-field digital mammography (Senographe 2000D; G.E. Medical Systems Milwaukee, Wisc., USA) were analyzed with and without a new wavelet-based CAD system for detecting and enhancing microcalcifications. The mammograms comprised roughly equal numbers of cases from each of the BIRADS (Breast Imaging, Reporting and Data System, according to the American College of Roentgenology) categories 1-5. Histologic confirmation was available for all of the 180 cases assigned BIRADS categories 3-5. Four readers interpreted all 280 images for suspicious microcalcifications using a scale of 1-5. The readers alternately assessed 5 images with and 5 without CAD. In a second reading immediately following the first, the readers had to reassess the 280 mammograms. The images that had already been interpreted without CAD were now presented with CAD and vice versa. The images were interpreted as soft copies on a diagnostic mammography workstation (Image Diagnost GmbH, Neufahrn/Munich, Germany). All images interpreted with CAD were presented with enhancement of microcalcifications by wavelet algorithms and prompting of microcalcifications. ROC (receiver operating characteristic) analyses were performed, and image interpretation time with and without CAD was measured. RESULTS: The overall time for interpretation required by all 4 readers together was 483 min with CAD compared to 580 min without CAD. ROC analysis revealed no significant advantage of CAD for the individual readers. Readers 3 (0.811/0.817) and 4 (0.799/0.843) had a slightly improved AUC (area under the curve) with CAD. Readers 1 and 2 had a slightly lower AUC with CAD (0.832 versus 0.861 and 0.818 versus 0.849). CONCLUSION: The CAD system significantly (P<0.05, t test) speeded up image interpretation with respect to the identification of microcalcifications, while the diagnostic quality remained almost identical under the study conditions.     

Digital mammography: observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed this study to evaluate the effects of pixel size on the characterization of mammographic microcalcifications by radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-view mammograms of 112 microcalcification clusters were digitized with a laser scanner at a pixel size of 35 microm. Images with pixel sizes of 70, 105, and 140 microm were derived from the 35-microm-pixel size images by averaging neighboring pixels. The malignancy or benignity of the microcalcifications had been determined with findings at biopsy or 2-year follow-up. Region-of-interest images containing the microcalcifications were printed with a laser imager. Seven radiologists participated in a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study to estimate the likelihood of malignancy. The classification accuracy was quantified with the area under the ROC curve (Az). The statistical significance of the differences in the Az values for different pixel sizes was estimated with the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz method and the Student paired t test. The variance components were analyzed with a bootstrap method. RESULTS: The higher-resolution images did not result in better classification; the average Az with a pixel size of 35 microm was lower than that with pixel sizes of 70 and 105 microm. The differences in Az between different pixel sizes did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Pixel sizes in the range studied do not have a strong effect on radiologists' accuracy in the characterization of microcalcifications. The low specificity of the image features of microcalcifications and the large interobserver and intraobserver variabilities may have prevented small advantages in image resolution from being observed.     

Real-time US elastography in the differentiation of suspicious microcalcifications on mammography

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the use of US elastography in the differentiation of mammographically detected suspicious microcalcifications, using histology as the reference standard. Between May 2006 and April 2007, real-time US elasticity images were obtained in 77 patients (age range, 24–67 years; mean, 46 years) with 77 mammographically detected areas of microcalcifications (42 benign and 35 malignant lesions) prior to needle biopsy. Two experienced radiologists reviewed cine clips of elasticity and B-mode images and assigned an elasticity score of 1 to 3 in consensus, based on the degree of strain in the hypoechoic lesion without information of mammography and histology. For the elasticity score, the mean ± standard deviation was 1.5 ± 0.7 for benign and 2.7 ± 0.7 for malignant lesions (P < 0.001). When a cutoff point between elasticity scores of 1 and 2 was used, US elastography showed 97% (34/35) sensitivity, 62% (26/42) specificity, 68% (34/50) PPV, and 96% (26/27) NPV with an Az value of 0.852 (0.753–0.923, 95% confidence interval) in the differentiation of benign and malignant microcalcifications. Our results suggest that US elastography has the potential to differentiate benign and malignant lesions associated with microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.     

Subtle gastric abnormalities in a canine model: detection with low-dose imaging with storage phosphors and its equivalence to conventional radiography

The authors compared low-dose (32% of standard exposure) storage phosphor digital imaging (system resolution: 0.2-mm pixels, 10 bits) with isovoltage 75-kVp conventional radiography (standard exposure) in the detection of subtle simulated gastric abnormalities by using air contrast barium studies. Subtle simulated abnormalities (3-7-mm polyps, 4-15-mm ulcer craters, 4-11-mm-diameter edema, and 11-12-mm linear ulcers) were produced in resected canine stomachs. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of 1,800 observations by six readers indicated that the digital images with and without high-frequency edge enhancement were equivalent to conventional radiographs (mean receiver operating characteristic areas [+/- standard deviation]: 0.76 +/- 0.06, 0.78 +/- 0.04, and 0.77 +/- 0.04, respectively). The accuracy of the diagnosis was equivalent for all three modalities. The following mean accuracies of negative and positive responses, respectively, for unenhanced digital, edge-enhanced digital, and conventional images were determined: 0.71 +/- 0.05 and 0.41 +/- 0.07, 0.71 +/- 0.04 and 0.51 +/- 0.09, and 0.68 +/- 0.04 and 0.43 +/- 0.05. It was concluded that low-dose storage phosphor air-contrast barium studies were equivalent to conventional radiography in the detection of subtle gastric abnormalities.     

Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work is to compare full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of breast cancer in a screening population. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Full-field digital mammography was performed in addition to screen-film mammography in 6736 examinations of women 40 years old and older presenting for screening mammography at either of two institutions. Two views of each breast were acquired with each technique. The digital and screen-film mammograms were each interpreted independently. In addition to a clinical assessment, each finding was assigned a probability of malignancy for use in receiver operating characteristic analysis. In cases in which the digital and screen-film interpretations differed, a side-by-side analysis was performed to determine the reasons for the discrepancy. With few exceptions, findings detected on either technique were evaluated with additional imaging and, if warranted, biopsy. RESULTS: Additional evaluation was recommended on at least one technique in 1467 cases. These additional evaluations led to 181 biopsies and the detection of 42 cancers. Nine cancers were detected only on digital mammography, 15 were detected only on screen-film mammography, and 18 were detected on both. The difference in cancer detection is not statistically significant (p > 0.1). Digital mammography resulted in fewer recalls than did screenfilm mammography (799 vs 1007, p < 0.001). The difference between the receiver operating characteristic curve area for digital (0.74) and screen-film (0.80) mammography was not significant (p > 0.1). Reasons for discrepant interpretations of cancer were approximately equally distributed among those relating to lesion conspicuity, lesion appearance, and interpretation. CONCLUSION: No significant difference in cancer detection was observed between digital mammography and screen-film mammography. Digital mammography resulted in fewer recalls than did screen-film mammography.     

A comparison of conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo in the detection of multiple sclerosis

Fast spin-echo (FSE) pulse sequences enable T2-weighted imaging in a fraction of the time required for T2-weighted conventional spin-echo (CSE) imaging. Due to concerns that the altered contrast characteristics of FSE may interfere with the visualization of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions, the sensitivity of T2-weighted FSE sequences was compared to comparably weighted CSE sequences in the imaging of the brain in 100 patients with clinically suspected MS. The proton-density FSE sequence revealed more MS lesions than its CSE counterpart, while the T2-weighted CSE sequences were found to be more sensitive than the T2-weighted FSE sequence. Contrast-to-noise ratios and signal-to-noise ratios compared favorably between sequences. Overall, there was little difference in the specificity between FSE and CSE in the diagnosis of MS. The higher sensitivity and the reduction in time attainable through the use of FSE warrants its replacement of CSE when imaging the brain in patients with clinically suspected MS. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:657-667.     

Digital mammography. ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications

We investigated the spatial resolution requirement and the effect of unsharp-mask filtering on the detectability of subtle microcalcifications in digital mammography. Digital images were obtained by digitizing conventional screen-film mammograms with a 0.1 X 0.1 mm2 pixel size, processed with unsharp masking, and then reconstituted on film with a Fuji image processing/simulation system (Fuji Photo Film Co., Tokyo, Japan). Twenty normal cases and 12 cases with subtle microcalcifications were included. Observer performance experiments were conducted to assess the detectability of subtle microcalcifications in the conventional, the unprocessed digital, and the unsharp-masked mammograms. The observer response data were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and LROC (ROC with localization) analyses. Our results indicate that digital mammograms obtained with 0.1 X 0.1 mm2 pixels provide lower detectability than the conventional screen-film mammograms. The detectability of microcalcifications in the digital mammograms is improved by unsharp-mask filtering; the processed mammograms still provide lower accuracy than the conventional mammograms, however, chiefly because of increased false-positive detection rates for the processed images at each subjective confidence level. Viewing unprocessed digital and unsharp-masked images in pairs resulted in approximately the same detectability as that obtained with the unsharp-masked images alone. However, this result may be influenced by the fact that the same limited viewing time was necessarily divided between the two images.     

A comparison between fast and conventional spin-echo in the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions

Long repetition time (TR) spin-echo (SE) with T₂- or proton density weighting is the sequence of choice to detect the brain lesions of multiple sclerosis (MS). Fast spin-echo (FSE) permits the generation of T₂-weighted images with similar contrast to SE but in a fraction of the time. We compared the sensitivity of FSE and SE in the detection of the brain lesions of MS. Six patients with clinically definite MS underwent brain imaging with both dual echo (long TR, long and short echo time (TE) SE and dual echo FSE. The SE and FSE images were first reviewed independently and then compared. A total of 404 lesions was detected on SE and 398 on FSE. Slightly more periventricular lesions were detected using SE than FSE (145 vs 127), whereas more posterior cranial fossa lesions were detected by FSE (77 vs 57). With both SE and FSE the short TE images revealed more lesions than the long echo. These results suggest that FSE could replace SE as the long TR sequence of choice in the investigation of MS.