Management of vaginal erosion of polypropylene mesh slings

PURPOSE: The SPARC (American Medical Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota) polypropylene sling has recently been introduced as an alternative delivery system to TVT (Ethicon, New Brunswick, New Jersey) tension-free vaginal tape for placement of a tension-free mid urethral sling. Erosion must always be considered a risk of synthetic materials. We present 4 cases of vaginal erosion of polypropylene mesh placed with this system and the successful conservative management done. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 90 patients received a SPARC polypropylene pubovaginal sling at our institution between October 1, 2001 and October 1, 2002. During followup 3 of our patients and 1 patient with tension-free vaginal tape who was referred from elsewhere presented with vaginal exposure of the mesh. RESULTS: Two patients described persistent vaginal discharge 6 weeks postoperatively, including 1 who complained primarily of partner discomfort during sexual intercourse. Two patients were completely asymptomatic and mesh erosion was discovered at routine physical examination 6 weeks postoperatively. Pelvic examination demonstrated vaginal exposure of the mesh in all cases. Each patient was observed conservatively and 3 months postoperatively all 4 had complete spontaneous epithelialization over the mesh. None had stress incontinence, urgency or urge incontinence, all emptied the bladder to completion and all patients were completely satisfied with the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The recent literature suggests that polypropylene mesh erosion should be treated with complete removal of the sling material. We present 4 cases of vaginal erosion of polypropylene slings that were managed conservatively with observation and resulted in complete spontaneous healing. Sling preservation with continued patient continence and satisfaction is a feasible option in those with vaginal exposure of polypropylene mesh.     

Urethral erosion after synthetic and nonsynthetic pubovaginal slings: differences in management and continence outcome

PURPOSE: We present a series of urethral erosion following a pubovaginal sling procedure due to synthetic and nonsynthetic materials and discuss their management and continence outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 3-year period 57 patients underwent urethrolysis for urethral obstruction after receiving a pubovaginal sling. Urethral erosion, defined as sling material entering the urethral lumen, was present in 9 patients and this cohort comprises the focus of our review. In 3 patients the eroded material was synthetic, that is ProteGen (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) in 2 and polypropylene in 1. This condition was treated with removal of the whole sling, multilayer closure of the erosion and selective use of a Martius flap. In 6 patients the eroded material was nonsynthetic, that is allograft fascia in 5 and autograft fascia in 1. This condition was treated with sling incision and multilayer closure of the urethra. Preoperative assessment included a urogynecologic questionnaire, measurement of pad use, a voiding diary, cystourethroscopy and videourodynamics. Postoperatively similar parameters were used to assess continence outcomes and the need for subsequent procedures. RESULTS: Nine patients were followed 30 months after urethrolysis. All 9 women had some manifestation of voiding dysfunction following the pubovaginal sling procedure, including urinary retention in 4, urge incontinence in 3 and mixed incontinence in 2. Urinary retention resolved in 3 patients and urge incontinence resolved in 4. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) persisted in 2 of the 3 patients in the synthetic group, while no patient in the nonsynthetic group had recurrent SUI. There were no recurrent urethral erosions or fistulas in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Urethral erosion after a pubovaginal sling procedure can occur irrespective of the sling material. However, recurrent SUI is not an invariable outcome of the management of urethral erosion following the pubovaginal sling procedure.     

The surgical results of the pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh for stress urinary incontinence

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the surgical results after a pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four women with different types of SUI underwent a pubovaginal sling procedure, using polypropylene mesh. The sling was placed at the level of the proximal half of the urethra and tied with adequate tension, but not obstructing the bladder outlet. A video-urodynamic study and transrectal ultrasonography were undertaken before and after surgery. The surgical results were assessed and the urodynamic changes compared at different stages. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 24 months, 52 patients (81%) were completely continent, 10 (16%) had an improvement but with mild SUI, and two had persistent SUI requiring a second sling procedure. The treatment result was considered satisfactory by 55 patients (86%). The video-urodynamic study showed no significant change in voiding pressure, cystometric capacity and residual urine volume after surgery. The bladder neck opening time was increased at 7 days and the maximum flow rate increased at 3 months after surgery. Transrectal ultrasonography showed that all the polypropylene mesh slings were located beneath the bladder neck and proximal urethra, with no notable granuloma formation around the sling. CONCLUSION: The pubovaginal sling procedure is effective in treating female SUI, using polypropylene mesh as the sling material. The video-urodynamic results showed that a pubovaginal sling of polypropylene mesh causes no bladder outlet obstruction when the correct surgical technique is used.     

Long-term surgical results of pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

INTRODUCTION: Surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women might cure incontinence symptom but develop new problems. This study assessed the long-term outcome of pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh in patients with SUI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 108 patients with various types of SUI received pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh. A surgical technique that did not create bladder outlet obstruction after operation was used in all the patients. Video urodynamic study was performed at baseline, 2 weeks and 3 months after operation. The long-term surgical results and patients' satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: The age of patients ranged from 33 to 94 years (mean 62.6 +/- 12.0 years). The follow-up period ranged from 24 to 72 months (median 46 months). Among the 108 patients, a successful result was noted in 92 (85.2%), including a continence rate of 65.7% and mild SUI in 19.4% of patients. Treatment failure was noted in 16 patients (14.8%), including 13 (12%) with urge incontinence and 3 (2.8%) with severe SUI that was cured by a second sling. There were 104 patients (96.3%) who could void volitionally with little residual urine, whereas 4 (3.7%) needed transvaginal urethrolysis. Urodynamic study revealed no significant changes in the mean values of parameters at 3 months after operation. However, 22 (20%) patients had an increase in voiding pressure by 50% at 3 months postoperatively. The reported satisfactory rate was 89.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh had a high success rate in all types of SUI. The continence rate was suboptimal, indicating that the absence of bladder outlet obstruction might result in inadequate urethral compression after pubovaginal sling procedure.     

Comparison of video urodynamic results after the pubovaginal sling procedure using rectus fascia and polypropylene mesh for stress urinary incontinence

PURPOSE: Video urodynamic changes were compared after the pubovaginal sling procedure using rectus fascia or polypropylene mesh in women with stress urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 women with various types of stress urinary incontinence were treated with the pubovaginal sling procedure using randomly abdominal rectus fascia in 24 or polypropylene mesh in 26. The sling was placed at the level of the bladder neck and tied with sufficient tension to prevent urinary leakage without obstructing the bladder outlet. Video urodynamics were performed preoperatively, and 7 to 14 days and 3 to 6 months postoperatively in all cases. Surgical results and urodynamic changes after the pubovaginal sling procedure were compared in the 2 groups. Long-term results were evaluated at a mean followup of 2 years. RESULTS: Complete continence was achieved in 23 patients (95.8%) in the rectus fascia group and 26 (100%) in the polypropylene mesh group, including 1 initial failure with reoperation, at a median followup of 24 and 23 months, respectively. The subjective success rate was 91.6% for rectus fascia and 92.3% for polypropylene mesh. The main cause of dissatisfaction was persistent urge incontinence and dysuria in 2 cases each. In each group video urodynamics revealed a mild but nonsignificant decrease in maximum urinary flow and a significant increase in bladder neck opening time at 7 to 14 days versus baseline. However, these parameters returned to baseline within 3 to 6 months postoperatively. Voiding pressure, cystometric capacity and post-void residual urine also showed no significant change in either group after the pubovaginal sling procedure. Patients treated with a polypropylene mesh sling had a shorter operative time and hospital stay, a higher spontaneous voiding rate after catheter removal and a lower incidence of wound pain after surgery. One patient treated with polypropylene mesh had sling margin extrusion. The incidence of new onset detrusor instability and persistent dysuria was similar in the 2 groups. Transrectal sonography of the sling showed that it was located beneath the bladder neck and proximal urethra in all patients in each group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that the pubovaginal sling procedure using rectus fascia or polypropylene mesh as the sling material had similar effectiveness for treating female stress incontinence but the polypropylene group had more rapid recovery. Postoperatively video urodynamics demonstrated that the pubovaginal sling using either sling material did not cause bladder outlet obstruction with proper surgical technique.     

Laparoscopic removal of pubovaginal polypropylene tension-free tape slings.

OBJECTIVES: Complications of polypropylene pubovaginal tension-free tape slings (TVT, SPARC, and others), such as erosion into the bladder or chronic pain attributed to the mesh sling are rare events; however, when they occur, it may necessitate removal of the sling. To date, removal through a laparotomy incision or by operative cystoscopy has been the most common approach. We present 5 cases of a laparoscopic approach for removal of polypropylene pubovaginal tension-free tape slings. METHODS: We report 5 cases of laparoscopic removal of TVT mesh. Three were removed for mesh erosion into the bladder, and 2 were removed secondary to the patients having persistent pain and discomfort attributed to the sling. An intraperitoneal approach was used to enter the retropubic space to remove the sling. Dissection was completed with a Harmonic scalpel blade as well as blunt dissection to identify the mesh sling retropubically. Average operating time was 104 minutes. Average blood loss was 70 mL. Average hospital stay was <23 hours. Postoperative courses were uneventful; however, 4 of the 5 patients continue to have urgency and frequency symptoms following sling removal. CONCLUSION: These cases illustrate the use of laparoscopy in the removal of polypropylene pubovaginal tension-free tape slings for bladder erosion or persistent pain, or both, attributed to the sling. Erosion and pain are known complications of polypropylene pubovaginal slings and may cause significant morbidity like persistent detrusor instability or urge incontinence, or both. Patients must be informed of these risks and possible complications before making their decision to undergo surgery.     

Erosion of woven polyester pubovaginal sling

PURPOSE: Various materials have been used for pubovaginal slings to correct female stress urinary incontinence. Use of synthetic materials provides a theoretical advantage in that no graft harvesting is necessary. Major risks of synthetic material use are erosion and infection of the sling. We report on erosion of woven polyester slings treated with pressure injected bovine collagen (ProteGen) which required removal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Office records of patients who had ProteGen slings removed at 5 centers during the last 24 months were retrospectively reviewed. Presenting symptoms, interval between sling placement and removal, subsequent procedures and continence status following sling removal were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 34 women required removal of the polyester sling secondary to erosion, infection or pain. The most common presenting complaints were delayed vaginal discharge in 21 patients (62%), vaginal pain or pressure in 21 (62%), suprapubic pain in 11 (32%) and recurrent urinary tract infection in 5 (15%) at a mean of 7.95 months (range 1 to 22) after sling placement. Of the patients 17 (50%) had vaginal erosion only, 7 (20%) isolated urethral erosion and 6 (17%) urethrovaginal fistulas. In 4 patients no erosion was obvious but slings were removed secondary to vaginal pain. Before sling removal 16 patients (47%) were totally dry, 13 (38%) had some degree of urinary incontinence and 3 (8%) had retention. Following sling removal 7 patients (20%) remained dry, 25 (74%) had mild to severe stress urinary incontinence with or without urgency and urge incontinence, and 2 (6%) are pending followup. CONCLUSIONS: Woven polyester slings treated with pressure injected bovine collagen are prone to erosion. Although the ProteGen sling was recalled in January 1999, patients who have had the sling placed must be followed closely.     

Pubovaginal sling using cadaveric fascia and bone anchors: disappointing early results

PURPOSE: Pubovaginal sling procedures offer highly effective treatment for patients with female stress urinary incontinence. A recent modification of this technique is the use of cadaveric fascia lata as a sling material supported with titanium anchors placed bilaterally in the pubic bone. We reviewed our experience with this procedure and assessed our outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 154 consecutive patients underwent a bone anchored, cadaveric fascia pubovaginal sling procedure by a single surgeon from July 1998 to June 1999. All patients were evaluated preoperatively with a detailed history, pelvic examination and radiographic or multichannel video urodynamic studies to diagnose stress urinary incontinence. Our technique begins with the nonincision placement of titanium bone anchors transvaginally into the pubic bone bilaterally. A 2 cm. wide tunnel is created bluntly beneath the vaginal epithelium between the 2 puncture sites with a right angle clamp. A 2 x 7 cm. strip of cadaveric fascia is then passed through the tunnel, into the retropubic space and secured to 2-0 polypropylene sutures attached to the anchors. After securing the sling, the transvaginal puncture sites are closed with 2-0 polyglactin sutures. Patients were seen postoperatively at 6 weeks, and 3 and 6-month followup. Patient age averaged 60 years (range 38 to 85), with an overall average length of followup from surgery of 10.6 months (range 6 to 16). All patients were mailed a self-administered questionnaire and participated in a telephone interview with an office nurse to retrospectively assess outcome and evaluate for recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Recurrent stress urinary incontinence was graded as 0-none, 1-rare, 2-moderate and 3-severe. Repeat pubovaginal sling procedure that was performed in patients with grades 2 to 3 stress urinary incontinence was considered a failure for the purpose of our study. RESULTS: Of all 154 patients 58 (37.6%) had recurrent moderate to severe (grades 2 to 3) stress urinary incontinence at followup. A total of 26 patients underwent a second pubovaginal sling procedure for a reoperation rate of 16.9%. Intraoperative findings at reoperation revealed the titanium anchors to be in position, the polypropylene sutures to be intact, and retropubic fibrosis and scarring of the urethropelvic ligament suggesting appropriate retropubic placement of the sling in all cases. Uniformly all allogenic cadaveric fascia used for sling material appeared to be fragmented, attenuated or simply absent. Average time to reoperation was 9 months (range 3 to 15). CONCLUSIONS: Early results using a bone anchored cadaveric fascia pubovaginal sling procedure were discouraging. Based on findings at reoperation, we attribute this result to the failure of our sling material and have abandoned the use of cadaveric fascia allografts in all pubovaginal slings at our institution.     

Clinical and urodynamic outcomes of pubovaginal sling procedure with autologous rectus fascia for stress urinary incontinence

AIM: We report the clinical and urodynamic outcomes of the pubovaginal sling procedure with autologous rectus fascia for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and determined the urodynamic parameters that could predict the occurrence of postoperative voiding difficulty. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2005, a total of 29 consecutive women with SUI underwent pubovaginal sling surgery with autologous rectus fascia. Patients were preoperatively and postoperatively evaluated with regard to symptoms and urodynamic findings including uroflowmetry (UFM), postvoid residual urine volume (PVR), filling cystometry (CMG) and pressure flow study (PFS). RESULTS: Overall SUI was cured in 23 patients (80%) and improved in 3 patients (10%). Three patients (10%) who developed persistent urinary retention or severe voiding difficulty after surgery underwent urethrolysis. Of 17 patients who had urgency before the pubovaginal sling, urgency was cured postoperatively in seven, while de novo urgency appeared in one patient. Maximum flow rate (Qmax) in UFM was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) and PVR was increased (P = 0.08) after surgery. PFS showed a significant increase in detrusor opening pressure and detrusor pressure at Qmax (P < 0.01) after surgery. Eight patients (28%) needed prolonged intermittent self-catheterization. Patients who had PVR >100 mL (P < 0.05) or Qmax < or = 20 mL/s (P = 0.09) in preoperative UFM were more likely to require prolonged intermittent catheterization after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The pubovaginal sling procedure with autologous rectus fascia is an effective treatment for SUI. A comparison of preoperative and postoperative urodynamic parameters indicates an increase in urethral resistance after pubovaginal sling surgery. PVR >100 mL and Qmax < or = 20 mL/s before surgery are risk factors for postoperative voiding difficulty.     

Voiding dysfunction following removal of eroded synthetic mid urethral slings

PURPOSE: Voiding dysfunction following genitourinary erosion of synthetic mid urethral slings is not clearly reported. We investigated the incidence of voiding dysfunction in patients following sling excision due to vaginal, urethral or intravesical mesh erosion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review identified 19 patients with genitourinary erosion of polypropylene mesh slings. Comprehensive urological evaluation was performed in all patients, and perioperative and postoperative data were analyzed. Voiding dysfunction was defined as refractory storage symptoms, emptying symptoms and pelvic pain. All subsequent medical and surgical interventions were recorded. RESULTS: In 19 patients a total of 11 vaginal, 7 intravesical and 5 urethral erosions occurred. Mean patient age was 52 years (range 32 to 69) and average followup was 8.4 months (range 3 to 34). Average time from symptom onset to sling removal was 10.1 months (range 1.5 to 38). Of the 19 patients 14 (74%) presented with multiple symptoms. Symptoms varied, including refractory pain, recurrent infections and bladder storage/emptying dysfunction. Urodynamic studies were abnormal preoperatively and postoperatively in 9 of 13 (69%) and 4 of 6 patients (67%), respectively. Following surgery lower urinary tract symptoms resolved completely in only 4 of the 19 patients (21%). Stress incontinence recurred in 8 of the 19 patients (42%). Five patients underwent simultaneous pubovaginal sling, of whom none had recurrent stress urinary incontinence. Only 9 patients (47%) considered themselves dry with no pads following surgery. Four patients required further surgery for refractory voiding symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Voiding dysfunction is not an uncommon finding after sling excision in the setting of genitourinary erosion. It may cause additional patient morbidity.     

Disabling complications with slings for managing female stress urinary incontinence

OBJECTIVE

To report an increase in the referral of patients with disabling complications after the failure of conservative therapy, their presentation, final surgical management and clinical outcome, following the use of non‐autologous slings (NAS), currently the primary surgical procedure for managing stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Thirty‐eight patients (mean age 64 years) required surgical management for disabling complications after placing a NAS for SUI. Sling types were synthetic (25), xenografts (six) and allografts (four). Twenty (53%) patients presented with bladder outlet obstruction, 13 (34%) with sling erosion, three (8%) with worsened SUI, and two (5%) with unobstructive severe urgency and frequency.

RESULTS

The sling was dissected and incised with no complication in 19 of 20 patients. One had a posterior urethral defect during sling dissection. Twelve patients (60%) acquired normal voiding and were continent. Among the 13 patients who had the sling dismantled and urethrolysis, two had recurrent or persistent SUI, two de‐novo urgency/frequency and one developed osteitis pubis. Three patients with disabling SUI received a pubovaginal sling placed proximal to the bladder neck, and had an overall improvement in their urinary control with no retention. Two unobstructed patients with urgency and frequency did not improve with anticholinergic medication and pelvic floor therapy, and are now candidates for botulinum toxin injection or neurostimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

The complication rate with periurethral NAS for managing SUI in females is substantial. Patients with refractory urgency/frequency after the sling need a complete evaluation with cystoscopy and video‐urodynamics. Obstruction and erosion are the commonest problems and require surgical correction.     

Surgical management of lower urinary mesh perforation after mid-urethral polypropylene mesh sling: mesh excision, urinary tract reconstruction and concomitant pubovaginal sling with autologous rectus fascia

Introduction and hypothesis

We present our management of lower urinary tract (LUT) mesh perforation after mid-urethral polypropylene mesh sling using a novel combination of surgical techniques including total or near total mesh excision, urinary tract reconstruction, and concomitant pubovaginal sling with autologous rectus fascia in a single operation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 189 patients undergoing transvaginal removal of polypropylene mesh from the lower urinary tract or vagina. The focus of this study is 21 patients with LUT mesh perforation after mid-urethral polypropylene mesh sling. We excluded patients with LUT mesh perforation from prolapse kits (n?=?4) or sutures (n?=?11), or mesh that was removed because of isolated vaginal wall exposure without concomitant LUT perforation (n?=?164).

Results

Twenty-one patients underwent surgical removal of mesh through a transvaginal approach or combined transvaginal/abdominal approaches. The location of the perforation was the urethra in 14 and the bladder in 7. The mean follow-up was 22 months. There were no major intraoperative complications. All patients had complete resolution of the mesh complication and the primary symptom. Of the patients with urethral perforation, continence was achieved in 10 out of 14 (71.5 %). Of the patients with bladder perforation, continence was achieved in all 7.

Conclusions

Total or near total removal of lower urinary tract (LUT) mesh perforation after mid-urethral polypropylene mesh sling can completely resolve LUT mesh perforation in a single operation. A concomitant pubovaginal sling can be safely performed in efforts to treat existing SUI or avoid future surgery for SUI.     

ANATOMICAL AND FUNCTIONAL RESULTS OF PUBOVAGINAL SLING PROCEDURE USING POLYPROPYLENE MESH FOR THE TREATMENT OF STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE

PURPOSE: The anatomical and functional results of pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 women with stress urinary incontinence, including 26 with type 2, 7 with mixed type 2/3 and 17 with type 3 disease, underwent the pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh. A self-fashioned 2 cm. polypropylene mesh sling was used in all cases. The slings were fixed without tension at each side of the bladder neck. The sling was further suspended to elevate the bladder neck in patients with type 2 disease and those with a hypermobile bladder base, while it was placed without further tension in those with type 3 disease and those with a nonmobile bladder base. After the operation video urodynamics and transrectal sonography were done to evaluate functional and anatomical results. RESULTS: At a median followup of 24 months 42 women were cured, 6 had improvement and treatment had failed in 2. Although the maximum flow rate increased, no changes were noted in detrusor pressure, post-void residual urine or cystometric capacity at month 3. Transrectal sonography revealed that mean sling width plus or minus standard deviation had decreased to 13.5 +/- 3.3 mm. at 3 months. The endopelvic fascia was thicker in women with type 2 than in those with types 2/3 or 3 disease (mean 5.3 +/- 1.5 versus 3.5 +/- 1.3 mm., p = 0.001). The position of bladder neck on video urodynamics was elevated a mean of 2.01 +/- 2.01 and 3.07 +/- 2.07 cm. compared to baseline elevation during resting and straining, respectively (p = 0). No hypermobility was noted while the patients coughed and no kinking of the urethra was observed while they performed the Valsalva maneuver. Detrusor instability resolved in 6 of 8 women (75%) and new onset detrusor instability was noted in 7 (14%). In 2 women with persistent stress urinary incontinence a repeat sling procedure was necessary to treat type 3 disease and cure incontinence. The overall success rate was 96%. One patient with sling erosion into the vaginal wall was treated with simple revision. CONCLUSIONS: Fixation of a polypropylene mesh sling at the bladder neck and adequate suspension may effectively achieve a hammock effect without creating bladder outlet obstruction in patients with types 2 and 2/3 stress urinary incontinence. The anatomical and functional results of this study show that a well suspended bladder neck did not create bladder outlet obstruction after a pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh.     

The use of polypropylene mesh as a transobturator sling for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (early experience with 40 cases)

This study evaluated the use of traditional polypropylene mesh, used in hernias repair, as a sling in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Forty patients diagnosed with SUI underwent transobturator sling fashioned from the ordinary polypropylene mesh (vypro II®). Each lateral end of the tape is secured by a zero prolene suture. The procedure was then done outside-in, and the patients were followed up. The mean operative time was 40–60 min when the procedure was performed alone or accompanied with associated pelvic floor repair. Thirty-five patients (87.5%) were cured, and two patients (5%) significantly improved, but the procedure failed in three patients (7.5%), and the slings were removed because of vaginal erosion. Polypropylene mesh transobturator sling is an easy and cheap method for the treatment of female SUI with a high success rate.     

Minimally invasive procedures for urethral incontinence: is there a role for laparoscopy?

This article focuses on the minimally invasive surgical approaches for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The role of laparoscopic suspension is reviewed and compared with other minimally invasive techniques, such as the pubovaginal sling procedure and injection of the urethral bulking agents. The role of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension remains ill defined in 2002. Once this minimally invasive technique is shown to duplicate the success rate of the open Burch procedure, it could be offered as a first-line therapy to patients with SUI. At this time, the pubovaginal sling (PVS) offers the best long-term results with acceptable low complication rates of urinary retention, urgency, and sling erosion or infection. These complications are rarely seen with the laparoscopic repair but the incidence of bladder injuries is higher. The PVS operation can be performed as a salvage procedure, in obese patients, and concomitant with cystocele and rectocele repair whereas data for laparoscopy in these conditions are lacking. Until the long-term efficacy of the laparoscopic repair is clearly defined, offering it to patients as a minimally invasive therapy denies them of procedures with superior efficacy.     

Long-term results of surgical treatment for female stress urinary incontinence

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term success rates of bladder neck suspension (BNS) and pubovaginal sling procedure in different types of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in order to identify appropriate treatment strategies for SUI. METHODS: A total of 157 women who received anti-incontinence surgery were followed-up for a mean period of 58.1 +/- 33.9 months. The surgical outcome was analyzed and was compared among the different types of SUI and among BNS and pubovaginal sling procedures. RESULTS: SUI was classified as type I in 16 patients, type II in 111 patients, and type III in 34 patients. Surgical procedures included Gittes BNS (n = 62), Raz BNS (n = 53), and pubovaginal sling procedure (n = 42). The total success rate was 77.1%, including a 38.2% cure rate and a 38.9% significantly improved rate. Analysis of the results revealed that type III SUI had the lowest success rate (67.6%), while the pubovaginal sling procedure had the best success (93.9%) and cure rates (54.8%). The success rates of BNS were significantly lower than that of pubovaginal sling in type III SUI, less favorable in type II SUI, but remained high in type I SUI. 75% of patients with treatment failure had recurrence within the fist postoperative year. CONCLUSIONS: In this series of patients, the long-term cure rates of anti-incontinence surgeries are not satisfactory. BNS procedures had satisfactory results only in type I SUI while the pubovaginal sling procedure had better results in both types II and III SUI. The pubovaginal sling procedure might have better long-term results in the treatment of all types of SUI.     

Expanded Indications for the Pubovaginal Sling: Treatment of Type 2 or 3 Stress Incontinence

Purpose

The usefulness of the pubovaginal sling procedure as primary treatment of stress incontinence associated with urethral hypermobility (type 2) or intrinsic sphincter deficiency (type 3) was determined.

Materials and Methods

A total of 60 consecutive cases of type 2 or 3 stress urinary incontinence was treated with a pubovaginal sling by 1 surgeon using a previously reported technique. Fluoroscopic urodynamic studies with leak point pressures were used to classify the type of incontinence. Of the 60 women 38 (63 percent) were diagnosed with type 2 and 22 (37 percent) with type 3 stress urinary incontinence. Of these patients 24 had previously undergone 1 or more anti-incontinence procedures.

Results

At a mean followup of 25 months 57 of the 60 patients (95 percent) were completely continent. In addition, 69 percent of patients with urgency had resolution of the urgency symptoms following the sling procedure. Transient postoperative urinary retention (median duration 6.5 days) was present in 60 percent of the patients. However, all women subsequently voided spontaneously without requiring further intermittent or Foley catheterization. Other complications occurred infrequently, and included urinary tract infection (13 percent of cases), de novo urgency (12 percent) and persistent incisional pain (5 percent).

Conclusions

These early results suggest that the pubovaginal sling is a safe and effective treatment for primary or recurrent type 2 or 3 stress incontinence. The most worrisome complication, urinary retention, occurred temporarily in more than half of the patients but eventually resolved in all cases, usually within 10 days.     

Management of polypropylene mesh erosion after intravaginal midurethral sling operation for female stress urinary incontinence

The intravaginal midurethral sling operations have become a trend to treat female stress urinary incontinence. Cases of complications requiring surgical revision are rarely reported. We report on seven patients with complications necessitating surgery. Six patients with vaginal erosion were treated with transvaginal excision of migrated tape and fibrotic tissues around the vaginal wall, and one patient with bladder erosion was treated with suprapubic minimal laparotomy and transvaginal partial excision of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT). The incidence of polypropylene mesh erosion was 1.1% in this study. All patients recovered well from our surgical intervention, except the bladder erosion patient who needed anticholinergic medication to treat postoperative urgency and urge incontinence.     

Male bulbourethral sling after radical prostatectomy: intermediate outcomes at 2 to 4-year followup

PURPOSE: We reviewed our experience with 49 consecutive patients undergoing a male sling procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 7-item International Prostate Symptom Score and 22-item incontinence quality of life questionnaire (although not validated in Italian) were used to assess the clinical impact of the bulbourethral sling. Surgical outcome was also assessed by videourodynamics at 1 year. Urodynamic success was defined as no leakage during videourodynamic evaluation. RESULTS: Mean followup was 32 months (range 26 to 48). Preoperatively 3 patients used 2 pads daily (mild incontinence), 34 used 3 to 5 (moderate incontinence) and the remaining 12 used more than 5 (severe incontinence). Clinical success was defined as a decrease in pad use to completely dry (no pad) or to social continence (1 pad daily) at followup. Of the 49 patients 38 (77%), 33 (67%) and 63% (31) were considered socially continent at the 3-month, 1-year and 3-year followup, respectively. Only 15 of the 49 patients (30%) were considered completely dry at the 3-year followup. Significant perineal pain was reported in the early postoperative period but it resolved in all patients. Infection occurred in 3 patients, while no erosion was found. CONCLUSIONS: The male perineal sling is a safe surgical option for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence, especially when strict patient selection is done. Patient satisfaction is superior to urodynamic results and the procedure allows physiological voiding. Patients should be informed of the possibility of progressive failure with time and significant perineal pain in the early postoperative period.     

Variations in strategy for the treatment of urethral obstruction after a pubovaginal sling procedure

PURPOSE: We evaluated the success of several techniques for treating urethral obstruction and erosion after a pubovaginal sling procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April 1998 and June 1999, 32 women 33 to 79 years old (average age 62) who underwent a pubovaginal sling procedure with various materials were referred for the assessment of urethral obstruction. Patients were evaluated with a urogynecologic history, physical examination, voiding diary, cystoscopy and video urodynamics. Surgical procedures to resolve urethral obstruction were performed transvaginally and the specific techniques used were based on the type of sling material, urethral erosion and concomitant stress incontinence or other urethral pathology. Outcome measures were assessed by disease specific quality of life questionnaires, voiding diary and urogynecologic questionnaire. RESULTS: Preoperatively 30 of the 32 women (93.7%) noticed urge incontinence, 20 (62.5%) performed intermittent self-catheterization, 6 (18.7%) had an indwelling catheter and 3 (9%) complained of concomitant stress urinary incontinence. After the sling takedown 29 patients (93.5%) achieved efficient voiding within week 1 postoperatively. Urge incontinence symptoms resolved in 20 cases (67%) but stress incontinence developed in 3 (9%). Of the 32 women 27 (84%) indicated that continence was much better than before the initial sling procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Managing urethral obstruction after a pubovaginal sling procedure is challenging. Using various techniques based on sling material, urethral erosion and bladder neck integrity a successful outcome is possible in the majority of cases.