Comparison of computed tomography and conventional cystography for detection of traumatic bladder rupture

Computed tomography (CT) is the method of choice for evaluating patients with blunt abdominal and/or pelvic trauma. However, the sensitivity of CT for detecting bladder ruptures has been questioned. We reviewed both the conventional cystograms and the CT examinations of 25 patients who had both studies as the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal and pelvic trauma in the last 5 years. Five of these 25 patients had bladder ruptures, three extraperitoneal and two intraperitoneal. All five injuries were detected by both CT and conventional cystography. In one patient the conventional cystogram was falsely positive. In this case the correct diagnosis was made by CT, and a repeat cystogram confirmed that no bladder injury was present. Our results indicate that CT, if properly performed, is as sensitive for detection of bladder injuries as conventional cystography.     

CT cystography versus conventional cystography in evaluation of bladder injury.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate prospectively the use of CT cystography, using retrograde filling of the bladder with diluted iodinated contrast material, versus conventional cystography to identify bladder injury in patients with hematuria after blunt abdominal trauma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria consisted of the adult hemodynamically stable abdominal trauma patient with hematuria referred for abdominopelvic CT and also being considered for cystography. An initial abdominopelvic CT scan using IV iodinated contrast material was obtained, as would have been done routinely in the trauma victim. A second CT scan through the pelvis was obtained after retrograde distention of the bladder with dilute iodinated contrast material. CT cystography revealing bladder injury was followed with appropriate therapy. CT cystograms not revealing injury were followed by conventional cystography. Results of patient outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: Over a 21-month period from January 1995 through September 1996, CT cystography was performed on 55 patients who presented with hematuria after blunt abdominal trauma. Five of the 55 patients had bladder injury on CT cystography. The injury in each of these five patients was confirmed intraoperatively. In the remaining 50 patients, both CT and conventional cystography did not reveal bladder injury. CONCLUSION: CT cystography is an accurate method for evaluating bladder injury in the blunt abdominal trauma victim with hematuria. CT cystography, performed in conjunction with routine CT of the abdomen and pelvis for evaluating traumatic hematuria, would therefore preclude conventional cystograms in these patients.     

CT cystography: radiographic and clinical predictors of bladder rupture

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to identify radiographic and clinical variables that correlate with bladder rupture that may then be used as selection criteria for CT cystography in trauma patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Hemodynamically stable trauma patients with hematuria were examined under standardized protocol with dynamic oral and i.v. contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis, followed immediately by CT cystography. CT cystography consisted of contiguous 5-mm axial scans of the pelvis after retrograde distention of bladder with 300-400 ml of 4% iodinated contrast material. Radiographic and clinical variables (pelvic fracture, pelvic fluid, intraabdominal visceral injury, degree of hematuria, hematocrit, units of blood transfused, base deficit, injury mechanism, seat belt use, sex, age) were assessed and statistically analyzed using the two-tailed Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon's rank sum test. Positive and negative individual and multivariate predictors were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 157 patients entered in our study, 12 (eight males and four females) had bladder rupture. One or more pelvic fractures were present in nine (75%) of the 12 patients (p < 0.001). Pubic symphysis diastasis, sacroiliac diastasis, and sacral, iliac, and pubic rami fractures were statistically associated with bladder rupture. Isolated acetabular fractures did not correlate with rupture. Eight (67%) of the 12 patients with bladder rupture revealed on CT cystography had gross hematuria (p < 0.001). No ruptures were seen in patients with <25 RBC/HPF (red blood cells per high-power field). All patients with rupture had pelvic fluid revealed on standard contrast-enhanced CT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Gross hematuria, pelvic fluid, and specific pelvic fractures were highly correlated with bladder rupture; identification of these findings may help in selection of trauma patients for CT cystography.     

Utility of routine trauma CT in the detection of bladder rupture

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency with which routine computed tomography (CT) fails to depict bladder rupture, the potential utility of delayed CT scans, and whether these findings might be useful in determining which patients may require subsequent cystography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cystograms and abdominal and pelvic CT scans of 54 patients with blunt trauma and in whom bladder rupture was clinically suspected were retrospectively reviewed. Blind readings of CT scans were performed by two genitourinary radiologists. Cystograms were used as the standard. RESULTS: Cystograms depicted bladder rupture in 10 patients. On CT scans, extravesical fluid was depicted in all three patients with intraperitoneal bladder rupture (although only a small amount of pelvic intraperitoneal fluid was present in two of these patients), in all seven patients with extraperitoneal bladder rupture, and in 32 of the 44 patients without bladder injury. Contrast material had been excreted into the bladder at the time of the initial or delayed CT in eight patients with bladder rupture; however, extravasation was identified in only four of the eight. In two of the four patients without extravasation, the bladder was distended at the time of CT. No bladder injuries were found in the 12 patients in whom pelvic fluid was not identified on CT scans. CONCLUSION: The absence of pelvic fluid on a trauma CT scan indicates that bladder rupture is unlikely. Even when a partially opacified bladder is passively distended, bladder injury may be present despite the absence of contrast material extravasation.     

CT cystography in the evaluation of major bladder trauma.

Computed tomographic (CT) cystography has been advocated in lieu of conventional cystography in the initial work-up of patients with suspected urinary bladder trauma. CT cystography was applied to a classification scheme for bladder injury based on the degree of wall injury and anatomic location and demonstrated characteristic imaging features for each type of injury. In bladder contusion (type 1), findings are normal. In intraperitoneal rupture (type 2), CT cystography demonstrates intraperitoneal contrast material around bowel loops, between mesenteric folds, and in the paracolic gutters. Manifestations of interstitial injury (type 3) include intramural hemorrhage and submucosal extravasation of contrast material without transmural extension. In extraperitoneal rupture (type 4), the path of extravasated contrast material is variable: Extravasation is confined to the perivesical space in simple extraperitoneal ruptures, whereas in complex extraperitoneal ruptures, contrast material extends beyond the perivesical space and may dissect into a variety of fascial planes and spaces. Combined intra- and extraperitoneal rupture (type 5) usually demonstrates extravasation patterns that are typical for both types of injury. Familiarity with these CT cystographic features allows accurate classification of bladder injury and allows prompt, effective treatment with less radiation exposure than and without the added cost of conventional cystography.     

Contrast material in posterior vaginal fornix mimicking bladder rupture: CT features

Abdominopelvic CT of a 22-year-old woman who sustained blunt abdominal trauma revealed a collection of contrast material posterior to the bladder. This CT appearance was interpreted as evidence of bladder rupture, despite previously performed normal retrograde cystography. Subsequent urologic studies confirmed the absence of bladder injury. Retrospective review of CT revealed that collection was within the vagina. This case demonstrates an important false-positive CT diagnosis of bladder rupture and confirms the importance of retrograde cystography for the diagnosis of bladder rupture.     

CT detection of serious internal and skeletal injuries in patients with pelvic fractures

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the percentage of patients with known pelvic fractures who have additional findings of intraabdominal injury, as diagnosed at abdominal computed tomography (CT), and to determine if patients with specific types or patterns of fractures are more likely to have additional injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors reviewed the medical records of 200 consecutive patients (125 women, 75 men; age range, 4-86 years) who had been admitted to a level 1 trauma center with osseous pelvic injury secondary to blunt trauma and who had undergone abdominal CT examinations. Abdominal CT findings in these patients were classified as negative, positive, or minimal and correlated with mechanism of pelvic fracture. RESULTS: Sixty-five (32%) of the 200 patients had negative CT findings, 43 (22%) had findings attributable to the trauma but required no follow-up, and 92 (46%) had positive findings that required nonsurgical management or exploratory laparotomy. Additional pelvic fractures were identified in 63 (32%) patients. The highest prevalence of additional injuries was in patients with Malgaigne fractures (four of 15, 27%) or bilateral pubic rami fractures (six of 18, 33%). CONCLUSION: CT examinations revealed that 135 (68%) of 200 patients with pelvic fractures secondary to blunt trauma had concomitant internal or skeletal injuries and that 92 (46%) patients had injuries severe enough to require nonsurgical management or exploratory laparotomy. Patients with bilateral pubic rami fractures or Malgaigne fractures were particularly prone to additional injuries; therefore, abdominal CT examinations are recommended in these patients.     

Role of multi-detector computerized tomography in diagnosis of traumatic urinary bladder injuries

Background

Urinary tract injuries occur in 3–10% of abdominal trauma. Early recognition and diagnosis of ruptured bladder is essential to lower this mortality rate. CT is the method of choice for the evaluation of patients with blunt or penetrating abdominal and/or pelvic trauma. Imaging in patients with suspected bladder injury with CT cystography may be performed using either an intravenous or retrograde technique.

Detection of pancreatic fluid and urine leakage after pancreas transplantation: value of CT and cystography

Leakage from the urinary bladder or duodenal stump after pancreas transplantation with urinary bladder drainage of the graft is difficult to diagnose clinically. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with fluoroscopic cystography and CT to determine their relative merit in the diagnosis of pancreatic fluid and urine leakage as documented by surgical exploration in pancreas transplant recipients. Thirteen leaks were diagnosed by fluoroscopic cystography or by CT in 11 patients after pancreas transplantation with urinary bladder drainage of pancreatic fluid. Conventional retrograde fluoroscopic cystography showed 11 leaks; CT with retrograde bladder opacification showed three leaks. Of the five CT studies that did not show a leak and that also were done within 7 days of a cystogram with abnormal findings, failure to use retrograde bladder opacification accounted for the majority (three cases) of missed diagnoses. Focal or free peritoneal abdominal fluid was seen in all CT examinations, with extravasation of contrast material seen into both walled-off collections and free ascites. Our experience suggests that retrograde bladder and duodenal stump opacification should be a routine part of the CT evaluation performed to detect leakage from the urinary bladder or duodenal stump after pancreas transplantation.     

Visceral injury without hemoperitoneum: A limitation of screening abdominal sonography for trauma

Abdominal sonography for the detection of hemoperitoneum has become increasingly popular as a screening test for visceral injury after blunt trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency, severity, and clinical significance (outcome) of abdominal organ injuries that occur without hemoperitoneum on the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma patients.During a 12-month period, 3392 blunt trauma patients were admitted to our center. Sonographic studies were performed as an initial screening evaluation to determine the presence of hemoperitoneum in 772 (22.7%) of these patients. Abdominal visceral injuries were verified by computed tomography (CT) or surgery in 196 (5.8%) of all blunt trauma admissions. Sonography, CT, and operative findings were reviewed to determine the presence or absence of hemoperitoneum in patients with abdominal injury. Patients with abdominal visceral injury without hemoperitoneum were further analyzed to identify the type of injury and the management required.A total of 246 abdominal injuries were identified in 196 patients. Fifty (26%) patients with abdominal visceral injuries diagnosed by admission CT scan had no evidence of hemoperitoneum. Admission sonography performed in 15 (30%) of these 50 patients also showed no evidence of hemoperitoneum. Visceral injuries detected by CT in the patients without hemoperitoneum included 22 of 100 splenic injuries (22%), 18 of 91 hepatic injuries (20%), 12 of 26 renal injuries (46%), and 1 of 9 mesenteric injuries (11%). Surgery was required to manage injuries in 10 of these patients.Up to 26% of blunt trauma patients with abdominal visceral injuries do not have associated hemoperitoneum identified on admission abdominal CT or sonography. Dependence on hemoperitoneum as the sole criterion of abdominal visceral injury after blunt trauma will result in falsely negative examinations and will miss potentially significant injuries.     

Traumatic lumbar hernia: CT diagnosis

A lumbar hernia usually involves protrusion of extraperitoneal fat or bowel through an area of weakness in the posterolateral abdominal wall bounded superiorly by the 12th rib, inferiorly by the iliac crest, posteriorly by the erector spinae muscle, and anteriorly by the posterior border of the external oblique muscle. Most are due to an acquired nontraumatic or congenital cause. Acute blunt abdominal trauma is a rare cause of lumbar hernia; to our knowledge, the CT diagnosis of this variety has not been reported. Since 1985, approximately 850 patients have undergone emergent abdominal CT for evaluation of acute abdominal trauma at our hospital; in seven of these patients, a traumatic lumbar hernia was diagnosed prospectively. In three patients, CT showed a flank hematoma with herniation of bowel through the lumbar triangle. CT showed pelvic fractures in three other patients, accompanied by herniation of bowel in one patient, herniation of extraperitoneal fat in another, and herniation of extraperitoneal fat and blood in the third. One patient had both a flank hematoma and a pelvic fracture with herniation of bowel. Acute traumatic lumbar hernia is a rare but significant abnormality that should be considered in patients with blunt abdominal trauma, especially in those with large flank hematomas and pelvic fractures. The hernia contents, associated injuries, and disrupted muscle layers are all well demonstrated on CT.     

Hemoperitoneum as the sole indicator of abdominal visceral injuries: a potential limitation of screening abdominal US for trauma.

PURPOSE: To determine, at screening ultrasonography, the prevalence, severity, and clinical outcome of clinically important abdominal visceral injuries, without associated hemoperitoneum, that result from blunt abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) was performed at admission in 466 patients with visceral injury. A retrospective review was performed of findings from surgery and contrast material-enhanced spiral and conventional CT performed to verify abdominal visceral injuries in 467 (4%) of 11,188 patients with blunt trauma. These patients were admitted to a level 1 trauma center over 33 months to determine the presence of hemoperitoneum and to identify the grade of injury. Medical records of patients with abdominal visceral injury without hemoperitoneum were reviewed for the management required and for results of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST). RESULTS: A total of 575 abdominal visceral injuries were identified at CT and/or surgery. Findings of CT at admission (n = 156) and of surgery (n = 1) revealed no evidence of hemoperitoneum in 157 (34%) patients with abdominal visceral injury; 26 (17%) of whom also had negative FAST studies. Abdominal visceral injuries diagnosed in patients without hemoperitoneum included 57 (27%) of 210 splenic injuries, 71 (34%) of 206 hepatic injuries, 30 (48%) of 63 renal injuries, four (11%) of 35 mesenteric injuries, and two (29%) of seven pancreatic injuries. Surgical and/or angiographic intervention was required in 26 (17%) patients without hemoperitoneum. CONCLUSION: Reliance on the presence of hemoperitoneum as the sole indicator of abdominal visceral injury limits the value of FAST as a screening diagnostic modality for patients who sustain blunt abdominal trauma.     

Nonoperative management of hepatic trauma

In an attempt to determine whether selective, nonoperative management of hepatic trauma might be efficacious, a retrospective review of liver injuries was undertaken. Of the 48 patients with liver injuries identified, there were 34 men and 14 women with an average age of 28.5 years. Mechanism of injury consisted of blunt trauma in 23 patients, stab wounds in 14 patients, and 11 patients had gunshot wounds. There were 12 grade I injuries, 15 grade II injuries, 17 grade III injuries, 2 grade IV injuries, and 1 grade V injury. Diagnosis of liver trauma was made at the time of exploratory laparotomy in 15 patients and suggested by abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan in 18 patients; the remaining 15 patients had a positive peritoneal lavage which led to exploratory laparotomy. Following blunt trauma, 14 patients, all of whom underwent diagnostic abdominal CT scans which confirmed hepatic injury, had nonoperative treatment. All patients who received nonoperative management maintained stable vital signs and only five required transfusion. None of the patients who were treated nonoperatively developed complications or required delayed laparotomy. There were no deaths in this group. Of the 34 patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy, 19 required either no treatment or minor hepatorrhaphy. However, 17 of 25 patients with penetrating wounds had associated abdominal injuries which required operative treatment. Based on the information obtained in this review, it is recommended that stable patients with isolated hepatic injuries, secondary to blunt trauma confirmed by CT scan, may be managed nonoperatively. Due to the high frequency of associated injuries found in patients with penetrating trauma, nonoperative therapy is not advised.     

Fatal isolated ruptures of bladder following minor blunt trauma

Traumatic bladder ruptures are generally secondary to severe trauma and associated with pelvic fractures. Conversely, isolated bladder ruptures following minor blunt trauma are rare and seldom fatal. We describe six fatal cases (five males, one female, 39-82 years old) of isolated bladder rupture subsequent to minor blunt trauma. Three cases were out-of-hospital deaths and among the three hospital cases, only one was diagnosed as bladder rupture ante-mortem. All victims had a history of chronic alcohol abuse. The differentiation between spontaneous and traumatic (accidental or purposely inflicted) bladder ruptures is crucial but may be difficult to assess, especially in cases involving alcohol abuse and occurring in a domestic setting.     

Radiographic and clinical predictors of bladder rupture in blunt trauma patients with pelvic fracture

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Bladder rupture is a potentially serious injury in blunt trauma patients. We determined whether location and displacement of pelvic fractures and the degree of hematuria can accurately predict bladder injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective database of 721 blunt trauma pelvic fractures that presented to a single large regional level 1 trauma center between January 1, 1997, and July 15, 2003, was expanded to include data on bladder injury and the initial urinalysis. Multiple logistic regression was performed to determine if an association exists between pelvic fracture pattern, degree of hematuria, and bladder injury. A potential clinical prediction rule was then derived using a point system for four independent, significant risk factors identified from the logistic regression results. RESULTS: There were 37 bladder ruptures (5.0%), all of which presented with hematuria >30 red blood cells per high-powered field (RBC/HPF). Pelvic injuries that were independently associated with bladder injury included diastasis of the pubic symphysis >1 cm, RR = 9.8 (95% CI 4.6-20.9), and fracture of the obturator ring with displacement >1 cm RR = 3.2 (95% CI 1.6-6.5). No patient with isolated acetabular fractures sustained bladder injury. A clinical prediction rule was derived, consisting of a single point for each of the significant pelvic injury sites in patients with hematuria >30 RBC/HPF. Patients with a prediction score of 0 had a 2.3% probability of bladder injury, whereas patients with scores of 1 and 2 had probabilities of bladder injury of 9.2% and 43.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with isolated acetabular fractures and patients with <30 RBC/HPF did not sustain bladder injury. In addition to hematuria, specific pelvic injury patterns are associated with bladder rupture. If validated, a clinical prediction rule derived from this data has the potential to guide the care of the blunt trauma patient.     

Evaluation of non-contrast-enhanced CT in blunt abdominal trauma]

We compared the findings of noncontrast-enhanced CT with those of contrast-enhanced CT in 126 patients with blunt abdominal trauma to evaluate the usefulness of noncontrast-enhanced CT. In 112 of the patients, visceral injuries were confirmed by surgery or clinical follow-up including CT. Although noncontrast-enhanced CT diagnosed all patients with 12 intestinal injuries requiring immediate surgery, contrast-enhanced CT missed two of these patients because high density hematomas on noncontrast-enhanced CT became isodense after IV administration of contrast material. However, contrast-enhanced CT was superior to noncontrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of hepatic and renal injuries. A case of renal artery occlusion was only visualized on contrast-enhanced CT. We conclude that both noncontrast- and contrast-enhanced CT should be performed for the CT evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma.     

Pelvic CT angiography: application to blunt trauma using 64MDCT

The evolution of multi-row detector computed tomography (MDCT) technology has resulted in evolving applications of CT angiography (CTA) in the trauma setting. In patients with significant blunt pelvic injuries, the immediate diagnosis and characterization of vascular injuries is of significant import given their morbidity and mortality in this patient population. The application of MDCT technology, specifically 64MDCT, to pelvic CTA is useful in evaluating for potential vascular injuries and may be integrated into admission trauma imaging in order to triage patients with blunt pelvic trauma to appropriate emergent intervention. This paper will discuss the use of pelvic CTA in blunt pelvic trauma and its utility in detecting and characterizing vascular injury, including the differentiation of arterial from venous hemorrhage. Protocol considerations in pelvic CTA using 64MDCT technology will be detailed as well as the integration of pelvic CTA into torso CT trauma protocols.     

Abdominal CT for trauma: an adequate screen for lower thoracic and lumbosacral fractures?

Purpose: To assess the utility of routine trauma abdomen and pelvic CT for the detection of lumbosacral spine fractures. Materials and methods: The radiology records of the University of Arizona Medical Center over a 12-month period were reviewed. Fifty-eight patients with suspected blunt abdominal trauma were studied who had both abdominal CT and radiographs of lumbosacral spine. Twenty-two had one or more fractures of the lumbosacral spine. Thirty-six patients who underwent both imaging studies and had no fracture identified by either modality were selected as controls. The images were reviewed independently by three radiologists who were blinded to the CT and plain radiograph findings. Following the blinded review, all discrepancies were reviewed by the interpreting radiologists who then arrived at a consensus interpretation. A fracture was determined to be present if, by consensus of the reviewers, it was seen on either the CT scan or plain radiograph. Results: Thirty-two fractures were identified; 28 (88 %) were identified on CT, 17(53 %) were seen on plain films. Overall routine abdominal CT is significantly more sensitive in the detection of fracture than plain radiographs. No unstable injuries were missed on plain film while one fracture dislocation was missed on CT. Conclusion: Bone images obtained from routine trauma abdomen and pelvic CT are significantly more sensitive than radiographs in the detection of fractures of the lumbosacral spine. However, CT alone may miss significant injuries.     

Using contrast-enhanced helical CT to visualize arterial extravasation after blunt abdominal trauma: incidence and organ distribution.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the incidence and organ distribution of arterial extravasation identified using contrast-enhanced helical CT in patients who had sustained abdominal visceral injuries and pelvic fractures after blunt trauma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Five hundred sixty-five consecutive patients from four level I trauma centers who had CT scans showing abdominal visceral injuries or pelvic fractures were included in this series. The presence or absence of arterial extravasation, as well as the anatomic sites of arterial extravasation, was noted. We obtained clinical follow-up data, including surgical or angiographic findings. RESULTS: In our series, 104 (18.4%) of 565 patients had arterial extravasation. Of the 104 patients, 81 (77.9%) underwent surgery, embolization, or both. The combined rate of surgery or embolization in patients with arterial extravasation was statistically higher than expected at all four institutions (p <0.001). The spleen was the most common organ injured, occurring in 277 (49.0%) of 565 patients, and arterial extravasation occurred in 49 (17.7%) of 277 patients with splenic injury. Several other visceral injuries were associated with arterial extravasation, including hepatic, renal, adrenal, and mesenteric injuries. CONCLUSION: Based on the limited reports of arterial extravasation in the nonhelical CT literature, the percentage (18%) of clinically stable patients in our study with CT scans showing arterial extravasation was higher than anticipated. This finding likely reflects the improved diagnostic capability of helical CT. Although the spleen and liver were the organs most commonly associated with arterial extravasation, radiologists should be aware that arterial extravasation may be associated with several other visceral injuries.     

CT features of blunt abdominal aortic injury

Abdominal aortic injuries are uncommon following blunt trauma, with relatively few reported series in the radiology literature. This study was conducted to identify common locations and imaging features of blunt traumatic abdominal aortic injury, the presence of associated visceral and osseous injuries, and the mechanisms of trauma. A retrospective review of 9,213 trauma registry entries over a 7-year period yielded 103 patients with aortic injuries, 12 of which had direct signs of abdominal segment involvement (dissection flap, focal intimal injury, intramural hematoma, active extravasation of contrast, or pseudoaneurysm formation). The majority (75 %) was isolated to the abdomen-67 % of which was infrarenal, 33 % suprarenal-while the other 25 % was a contiguous extension from a thoracic injury. Abdominal aortic injuries were uncommonly seen in isolation: all but one patient (92 %) demonstrated either retroperitoneal blood or stranding, hemoperitoneum, and/or CT signs of hypoperfusion complex, and only one patient (8 %) had no associated solid organ or skeletal injuries. All patients had a mechanism of injury which involved direct trauma to the abdomen, most commonly a motor vehicle collision. Similar to other recent series, there was an increased rate of abdominal segment injury (11.7 % of all aortic injuries) in this series compared to more remote autopsy series. This difference is likely due to detection of injuries which went undiagnosed before the widespread use of multidetector CT, which has become the standard of care for both acute evaluation following blunt trauma and for follow-up.