A randomized clinical trial of methadone maintenance for prisoners: results at 1-month post-release

BACKGROUND: Despite its effectiveness, methadone maintenance is rarely provided in American correctional facilities. This study is the first randomized clinical trial in the US to examine the effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment provided to prisoners with pre-incarceration heroin addiction. METHODS: A three-group randomized controlled trial was conducted between September 2003 and June 2005. Two hundred eleven Baltimore pre-release inmates who were heroin dependent during the year prior to incarceration were enrolled in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to the following: counseling only: counseling in prison, with passive referral to treatment upon release (n=70); counseling+transfer: counseling in prison with transfer to methadone maintenance treatment upon release (n=70); and counseling+methadone: methadone maintenance and counseling in prison, continued in a community-based methadone maintenance program upon release (n=71). RESULTS: Two hundred participants were located for follow-up interviews and included in the current analysis. The percentages of participants in each condition that entered community-based treatment were, respectively, counseling only 7.8%, counseling+transfer 50.0%, and counseling+methadone 68.6%, p<.05. All pairwise comparisons were statistically significant (all ps<.05). The percentage of participants in each condition that tested positive for opioids at 1-month post-release were, respectively, counseling only 62.9%, counseling+transfer 41.0%, and counseling+methadone 27.6%, p<.05, with the counseling only group significantly more likely to test positive than the counseling+methadone group. CONCLUSIONS: Methadone maintenance initiated prior to or immediately after release from prison appears to have beneficial short-term impact on community treatment entry and heroin use. This intervention may be able to fill an urgent treatment need for prisoners with heroin addiction histories.     

A comparison of residential heroin detoxification patients and methadone maintenance patients

Interviews were conducted with 101 heroin dependent persons entering a residential drug-free detoxification unit in 1989. These self-report data were compared with those previously collected in 1985-6 from 457 methadone maintenance patients. The detoxification patients injected less frequently, used less heroin, had been physically dependent for a shorter period and were more likely to be single, unemployed and to have been charged with a criminal offence in the last 12 months. It is suggested that these findings may indicate that addicts who use more heroin are less likely to seek drug-free detoxification. The wider implication of the finding is that future surveys of injecting drug users should assume that there are significant differences between heroin users entering different modalities of treatment.     

Long-term methadone maintenance reduces protracted symptoms of heroin abstinence and cue-induced craving in Chinese heroin abusers

BACKGROUND: Cession of heroin use may be followed by a protracted-abstinence (PA) syndrome consisting of craving, negative mood, and physiological changes. PA symptoms have rarely been compared between drug-free and methadone-maintained former heroin users after similar lengths of heroin abstinence. METHODS: Seventy former heroin users were included in one of four groups: in day 15-45 of methadone maintenance therapy (short-term MMT), in month 5-6 of MMT (long-term MMT), opiate-free for 15-45 days after methadone-assisted heroin detoxification (short-term post-methadone), and opiate-free for 5-6 months after methadone-assisted heroin detoxification (long-term post-methadone). PA symptoms (negative mood, dyssomnia, somatization, and craving), and blood pressure and pulse were assessed pre- and post-neutral videotape and pre- and post-heroin videotape. RESULTS: Dyssomnia and the total PA score were worst in short-term post-methadone participants, mood was best in long-term MMT participants, and cue-induced craving was least severe in long-term MMT participants. Blood pressure and pulse did not differ across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Even after acute withdrawal, the first months of heroin abstinence after methadone-assisted detoxification may be more difficult in terms of cue-induced craving and other PA symptoms than the first months of heroin abstinence during MMT. Our findings add to the literature supporting MMT for prevention of cue-induced heroin craving.     

Counseling as an intervention for the cocaine-abusing methadone maintenance patient

Using archival data from Bay Area Addiction Research and Treatment (BAART), a methadone treatment provider, this study examined the efficacy of the clinical intervention of counseling on cocaine use by BAART patients. California State Assembly Bill 2071 mandated that patients at methadone clinics be required to undergo a minimum of 50 minutes of counseling per month. Records of 179 patients continuously active in treatment beginning 12 months prior to (i.e., the baseline) and two years after AB 2071's implementation were reviewed. These patients were also identified as cocaine abusers. A pretest-intervention-posttest design was employed, with the increased counseling mandated by AB 2071 as the intervention. Cocaine abusers' urinalysis results during the one-year baseline were compared to the time period following AB 2071's implementation. The independent variable was the amount of counseling received and the dependent variable was cocaine use. The prediction was that cocaine-abusing methadone maintenance patients would have fewer cocaine positive urine analyses following AB 2071's implementation than in the 12-month baseline period preceding AB 2071. Results supported the main hypothesis that cocaine-abusing patients would show better improvement following AB 2071. Additionally, the actual amount of time in counseling was shown to lead to greater improvement in treatment for cocaine abusers. An important secondary finding was that heroin use was also negatively correlated to time in counseling. There were no gender differences in the response to the counseling treatment.     

A controlled trial of methadone treatment combined with directly observed isoniazid for tuberculosis prevention in injection drug users

Substance abuse is associated with high risk for tuberculosis (TB) and poor adherence to medication regimens. This study compared completion rates for isoniazid (INH) preventive therapy for injection drug users (IDUs) randomly assigned to methadone treatment combined with directly observed preventive treatment (DOPT) versus those assigned to routine TB clinic referral without methadone treatment. One hundred and eleven opioid-dependent patients with latent TB were assigned to one of three 6-month treatment conditions: standard methadone treatment including substance abuse counseling combined with daily INH DOPT (n=37); minimal methadone treatment without counseling, also combined with daily INH DOPT (n=35); or routine care referral to TB clinic for monthly INH supplies without DOPT and without methadone treatment (n=39). INH completion rates were 77.1% for minimal methadone and 59.5% for standard methadone, as compared with only 13.5% for routine care (P<0.0001). Mean duration of INH treatment retention was 5.7, 5.0 and 1.6 months, respectively (P<0.0001). TB incidence at 4-year follow-up was 0 of 54 subjects who completed preventive therapy versus 2 of 57 who failed to complete. One of these two had been assigned to routine care, and the other to minimal methadone. In conclusion, INH retention time and completion rates were significantly improved by methadone treatment combined with observed INH, whether or not substance abuse counseling was provided. The results of this study indicate that methadone treatment offers clear public health benefits when it is used to deliver preventive medical services.     

Treating cocaine-using methadone patients: predictors of outcomes in a psychosocial clinical trial

Cocaine-using methadone patients in two clinics were assigned to 8 months of enhanced methadone treatment-primarily cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for cocaine use-while similar patients in two "sibling" clinics were assigned to standard methadone treatment during 1995-1998. Cocaine use declined significantly from baseline to 4- and 12-month follow-ups. Patients receiving CBT rated the quality of their counseling relationship higher and obtained more supportive services than those receiving standard treatment. However, study treatment condition itself was not associated with outcome. Baseline measures associated with poorer outcomes across both treatment conditions were: currently enrolled in methadone treatment (in contrast to being newly enrolled), higher cocaine use frequency, greater cocaine use associated problem recognition, and an ambivalent attitude toward methadone. The results are consistent with some previous clinical trials showing that psychosocial treatments of different intensities result in similar declines in cocaine use. The findings indicate that methadone maintenance treatment can help dually-addicted patients reduce their cocaine use.     

Differences in heroin addicts seeking inpatient detoxification, ambulatory detoxification, or methadone maintenance

Fifteen psychosocial characteristics of 300 male and 90 female heroin addicts admitted for inpatient detoxification, ambulatory detoxification, and methadone maintenance within the same multiphasic drug-abuse program were compared to determine whether or not their characteristics differentiated those seeking each type of treatment approach; there were 100 men and 30 women randomly drawn to represent each of the three approaches. Only two variables differed among the three approaches for both men and women--length of daily heroin use and educational attainment. The ambulatory detoxification patients had started using heroin daily at a later age than the inpatients who, in turn, had started using heroin daily at a later age than the methadone maintenance patients, and the ambulatory detoxification patients were more educated than the inpatients. The other variables differentiating the three approaches for each sex were discussed, and the conclusion was drawn that addicts with higher socioeconomic levels preferred ambulatory detoxification over methadone maintenance.     

Incarcerated intravenous heroin users: Predictors of post-release utilization of methadone maintenance treatment

Incarcerated intravenous heroin users have more problematic patterns of heroin use, but are less likely to access methadone maintenance treatment by their own initiative than heroin users in the community. The present study examined predictors for receiving methadone maintenance treatment post-release among incarcerated intravenous heroin users within a 24-month period. This cohort study recruited 315 incarcerated intravenous heroin users detained in 4 prisons in southern Taiwan and followed up within the 24-month period post-release. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was applied to determine the predictive effects of sociodemographic and drug-use characteristics, attitude toward methadone maintenance treatment, human immunodeficiency virus serostatus, perceived family support, and depression for access to methadone maintenance treatment after release. There were 295 (93.7%) incarcerated intravenous heroin users released that entered the follow-up phase of the study. During the 24-month follow-up period, 50.8% of them received methadone maintenance treatment. After controlling for the effects of the detainment period before and after recruitment by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, incarcerated intravenous heroin users who had positive human immunodeficiency virus serostatus (HR = 2.85, 95% CI = 1.80–4.52, p < .001) and had ever received methadone maintenance treatment before committal (HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.23–3.05, p < .01) were more likely to enter methadone maintenance treatment within the 24-month follow-up period. Positive human immunodeficiency virus serostatus with fully subsidized treatment and previous methadone maintenance treatment experiences predicted access of methadone maintenance treatment post-release. Strategies for getting familiar with methadone maintenance treatment during detainment, including providing methadone maintenance treatment prior to release and lowering the economic burden of receiving treatment, may facilitate entry of methadone maintenance treatment for incarcerated intravenous heroin users.     

Use of non-prescribed methadone and other illicit drugs during methadone maintenance treatment

Patterns of illicit and non-prescribed drug use among a cohort of 100 patients in methadone maintenance treatment were tracked over a 6-month period. While there were no statistically significant changes in alcohol or heroin use, there were significant increases in the frequency of crack cocaine and cannabis use. Use of non-prescribed methadone had also increased. Twenty-one percent reported non-prescribed methadone use at follow-up who had not done so at the first interview, with increases also in the mean quantities used. Non-prescribed methadone use at the second interview was strongly associated with the amounts of both methadone and diazepam prescribed at each of the data collecting points.     

Determinants of methadone treatment assignment among heroin addicts on first admission to public treatment centres in Italy

AIMS: To identify factors associated with entering any methadone treatment at first admission at an NHS treatment centre in Italy and to investigate determinants of receiving detoxification or maintenance methadone treatments. METHODS: Data were analysed from 565 heroin addicts who entered for the first time one of 90 NHS treatment centres in 12 Italian regions between September 1998 and March 2001. Subjects were interviewed at admission by the centre's staff and followed-up for 18 months. Details on treatments provided were recorded using a standardised form. Random effects logistic regression analysis was applied. RESULTS: Factors positively associated with any methadone treatment assignment were: being younger than 25 years and using heroin more than twice a day, having been recently incarcerated, and living with a partner. Independent predictors of admission to methadone maintenance were injecting heroin, having sex without a condom in the previous six months, being HIV positive and having been enrolled at a NHS TC where a psychiatrist was present. Using heroin once a day or more and using cocaine were factors associated with enrollment into detoxification treatment. A significant heterogeneity between centres was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study give an insight into different patient profiles who are enrolled in methadone treatments. The observed heterogeneity between centres indicates the need to develop and implement common guidelines for the access of heroin addicts to substitution treatment.     

In-patient detoxification procedures, treatment retention, and post-treatment opiate use: comparison of lofexidine + naloxone, lofexidine + placebo, and methadone

OBJECTIVE: In-treatment and post-treatment outcomes were compared for three detoxification procedures (lofexidine+naloxone, lofexidine+placebo naloxone, and methadone). SAMPLE AND DESIGN: The sample was 137 opiate dependent in-patients. Detoxification treatments were 6-day lofexidine+naloxone (n=45), lofexidine+placebo naloxone (n=46), or 10-day methadone reduction (n=46). A cohort study design was used with double-blind random allocation to lofexidine+naloxone versus lofexidine+placebo. Patients who did not consent to, or who were excluded from randomisation received methadone. RESULTS: Outcome differences between treatment groups at follow-up were generally associated with length of stay post-detoxification rather than detoxification procedure. Among patients who were not opiate abstinent throughout follow-up (n=85), those who received lofexidine+naloxone detoxification reported a longer interval to first heroin use, with an interaction between detoxification medication and subsequent retention in treatment also identified. CONCLUSIONS: Detoxification medication may influence medium-term opiate use outcomes via its effect upon retention in treatment.     

Symptoms discriminating between heroin addicts seeking ambulatory detoxification or methadone maintenance

The self-report symptom inventory, SCL-90-R, was administered to 240 heroin addicts seeking ambulatory detoxification and 240 requesting methadone maintenance. Controlling for age, a stepwise discriminant analysis employing a backward elimination model was performed with the SCL-90-R's nine symptom factors to determine if the addicts described different levels of symptomatology. Interpersonal sensitivity and depression differentiated between the two groups; the ambulatory detoxification patients were more depressed and described less interpersonal sensitivity than the methadone maintenance patients. The results supported the contention that heroin addicts seeking ambulatory detoxification or methadone maintenance may display different symptoms.     

Neuropsychological functioning in opiate-dependent subjects receiving and following methadone maintenance treatment

OBJECTIVE: An accumulating body of research suggests that former heroin abusers in methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) exhibit deficits in cognitive function. Whether these deficits are present in former methadone maintained patients following discontinuation of MMT is unknown. This study tests the hypothesis that former heroin users who have detoxified from methadone maintenance therapy and are drug-free have less pronounced cognitive impairment than patients continuing long-term MMT. METHOD: A series of neuropsychological tests were administered to three groups of subjects: 29 former heroin addicts receiving methadone maintenance treatment, 27 former heroin addicts withdrawn from all opiates, and 29 healthy controls without a history of drug dependence. Testing included Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Vocabulary Test, the Stroop Color-Word Test, the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, the Benton Visual Retention Test, and a Substance Use Inventory. FINDINGS: Both methadone-maintained and abstinent subject groups performed worse than controls on tasks that measured verbal function, visual-spatial analysis and memory, and resistance to distractibility. Abstinent subjects performed worse than their methadone maintained counterparts on tests measuring visual memory and construct formation. Cognitive impairment did not correlate with any index of drug use. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed previous findings of neuropsychological impairment in long-term MMT recipients. Both patients receiving MMT and former heroin users in prolonged abstinence exhibited a similar degree of cognitive impairment. Cognitive dysfunction in patients receiving methadone maintenance may not resolve following methadone detoxification.     

A 12-month controlled trial of methadone medical maintenance integrated into an adaptive treatment model

Methadone medical maintenance (MMM) reduces the reporting schedule for stable and well-functioning methadone maintenance patients to once a month, with counseling provided by medical staff. We report on the 12-month outcomes of 92 highly stable methadone maintenance patients randomly assigned to one of three study conditions: routine care, MMM at the methadone maintenance program, and MMM at a physician's office. Methadone medical maintenance patients received a 28-day supply of methadone, whereas routine care patients received five or six take-home methadone doses each week. All patients performed a medication recall once a month and submitted two urine samples each month. An adaptive stepped-care system of treatment intensification was used for patients who failed recall or who had drug-positive urine specimens. Seventy-seven patients completed the 12-month study period. Dropout was caused primarily by problems with handling methadone and disliking the recall frequency. There were low rates of drug use or failed medication recall. Treatment satisfaction was high in all groups, but the MMM patients initiated more new employment or family/social activities than did routine care patients over the study period. The stepped-care approach was well tolerated and matched patients to an appropriate step of service within a continuum of treatment intensity.     

Voucher-based reinforcement of opiate abstinence during methadone detoxification.

Methadone detoxification is often used in the treatment of opiate dependence. This procedure, however, is frequently associated with continued opiate use, and high rates of attrition and relapse. In this study, a 90-day methadone detoxification was enhanced by adding voucher-based reinforcement of opiate abstinence before, during and after the dose tapering schedule. After 4 weeks of standard methadone maintenance (baseline), subjects were randomized to either the abstinence (n=26), or attendance reinforcement (n=22) condition. During the remaining 22 weeks of the study, the abstinence reinforcement group could receive vouchers with monetary value three times per week for providing opiate-negative urine specimens, while subjects in the attendance reinforcement group received vouchers of equal value for attending the clinic, regardless of urinalysis results. Methadone maintenance continued during weeks 5-10, dose tapering was implemented during weeks 11-23, and during weeks 24-26 the voucher schedule remained in effect but no medication was provided. Fifty percent of clients in both groups completed dose tapering, and 40% completed the vouchers-only phase. Subjects in the abstinence as compared with the attendance reinforcement group had lower rates of opiate use during the maintenance and detoxification phases, and longer periods of opiate abstinence during the detoxification phase. Cocaine use was also lower in the abstinence than the attendance reinforcement group during the maintenance and detoxification phases. In addition, abstinence as compared with attendance reinforcement subjects reported significantly fewer intravenous injections during the detoxification phase. Voucher-based reinforcement procedures could be useful for successfully transitioning patients into opiate antagonist therapy, or drug-free treatments.     

A psychoeducational approach to methadone maintenance treatment

Methadone maintenance has become the treatment of choice for heroin addiction because of its beneficial effects on illicit opiate use and criminality. Yet methadone maintenance falls short in a variety of ways; methadone clients continue to use drugs, experience high rates of psychopathology and alcoholism, and fail to become employed and integrated into the community. These problems are endemic in addicts, but also can be attributed to a host of strategic and tactical failures in methadone maintenance treatment itself. Traditional counseling is an inadequate and confused way to provide clients with the living skills, psychotherapy, and limit setting they need. S.T.A.R. is a methadone program in Portland, Oregon, that emphasizes direct training of educational, recreational, and personal skills. Group treatment is employed to create social support for clients while psychotherapy and crisis counseling are available on an as-needed basis. Implementation of the model has caused some difficulties and has led to creative and promising results.     

Treatment process components and heroin use outcome among methadone patients

The study proposes and tests an integrative and directional (structural equations) model to explain how pre-treatment motivation, frequency and content of counselling services, programme perceptions, and methadone dose are related to 1 and 6 months heroin use outcomes among opiate addicts receiving outpatient methadone treatment. Data were collected as part of the National Treatment Outcome Research Study (NTORS). The sample comprised 262 patients who were admitted to, and retained in methadone treatment programmes at 6 months. Structural equation models showed several relationships between treatment process variables and heroin use outcomes at 1 and 6 months follow-up. Programme perceptions and methadone dose were related to reduced heroin use at 1 month; early engagement with treatment services was related to reduced heroin use at 6 months. Pre-treatment motivation and engagement with treatment services were indirectly related to reduced heroin use at 1 month through their association with programme perceptions. Short-term (1 month) heroin use was strongly related to heroin outcome at 6 months. In addition to direct effects, treatment factors may have important indirect effects upon subsequent outcomes through their influence upon short-term outcomes.     

综合心理干预对美沙酮维持治疗患者的临床疗效研究

目的 研究综合心理干预对美沙酮维持治疗患者的疗效.方法 69例海洛因依赖患者作为观察组予美沙酮治疗治疗的同时予心理干预治疗3个月,与其人口学资料相匹配的60例海洛因依赖患者作为对照组仅予以美沙酮维持治疗,治疗时及治疗结束后分别采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)对两组患者进行评定,治疗过程中及治疗结束后3个月跟踪检查海洛因使用情况.结果 两组治疗后在SAS、SDS量表得分差异有统计学意义(t=-2.858、-2.465,均P＜0.05),在治疗2个月后及治疗结束后3个月内,给予心理干预的观察组偷吸人数显著低于对照组(x2 =6.906、5.054、5.100、4.247,均P＜0.05).结论 对美沙酮维持治疗的海洛因依赖患者给予综合心理干预治疗,在改善患者心理健康状况及减少偷吸方面的短期疗效显著.     

Heroin craving and drug use in opioid-maintained volunteers: effects of methadone dose variations

Recent data indicate that opioid agonist and antagonist challenges decrease and increase (respectively) heroin craving in physically dependent individuals. This study investigated effects of methadone dose variations on craving and new drug use in 18 outpatients who were given money contingencies. In Phase 1, volunteers were told in different test sessions that methadone dose would increase, decrease, or stay the same; drug-abstinence contingencies were suspended for 24 hr. Craving significantly increased and new heroin use marginally increased (relative to maintenance dose) only when a dose reduction was paired with a dose decrease instruction. In Phase 2 (detoxification), craving and heroin use significantly increased as methadone dose decreased. Thus, loss of micro-receptor agonist effect increased craving and risk of relapse.     

A randomized clinical trial of methadone maintenance for prisoners: Results at 12 months postrelease

This study examined the impact of prison-initiated methadone maintenance at 12 months postrelease. Males with preincarceration heroin dependence (N = 204) were randomly assigned to (a) Counseling Only: counseling in prison, with passive referral to treatment upon release; (b) Counseling + Transfer: counseling in prison with transfer to methadone maintenance treatment upon release; and (c) Counseling + Methadone: counseling and methadone maintenance in prison, continued in the community upon release. The mean number of days in community-based drug abuse treatment were, respectively, Counseling Only, 23.1; Counseling + Transfer, 91.3; and Counseling + Methadone, 166.0 (p < .01); all pairwise comparisons were statistically significant (all ps < .01). Counseling + Methadone participants were also significantly less likely than participants in each of the other two groups to be opioid-positive or cocaine-positive according to urine drug testing. These results support the effectiveness of prison-initiated methadone for males in the United States. Further study is required to confirm the findings for women.