Central nervous system involvement in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia at diagnosis: results from the international ALL trial MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993

Outcome of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adults with central nervous system (CNS) disease at diagnosis is unclear. We treated 1508 de novo ALL patients with 2-phase induction and then high-dose methotrexate with l-asparaginase. Patients up to 50 years old in first remission (CR1) with a matched related donor (MRD) underwent an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT); the remainder in CR1 were randomized to an autologous SCT or intensive consolidation followed by maintenance chemotherapy. Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive patients were offered a matched unrelated donor (MUD) allogeneic SCT. Seventy-seven of 1508 (5%) patients a median age of 29 years had CNS leukemia at presentation; 13 of the 77 (17%) had Ph-positive ALL. Sixty-nine of 77 (90%) patients attained CR1. Thirty-six patients underwent transplantation in CR1 (25 MRD, 5 MUD, and 6 autografts). Eleven of 25 patients with MRD transplantation remain alive at 21 to 102 months, 2 of 5 with MUD at 42 and 71 months, and 1 of 6 with autologous SCT at 35 months. Seven of 27 treated with consolidation/maintenance remain in CR1 56 to 137 months after diagnosis. Overall survival at 5 years was 29% in those with CNS involvement at diagnosis versus 38% (P = .03) for those without. CNS leukemia in adult ALL is uncommon at diagnosis. Adult Ph-negative ALL patients, however, can attain long-term disease-free survival using SCT as well as conventional chemotherapy.     

Hematopoietic transplantation from adult unrelated donors as treatment for acute myeloid leukemia

Transplantation from unrelated donors (URD) is increasingly being used as treatment for hematological malignancies, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This increase is the consequence of the availability of more than 11 million URD volunteers and the more efficient donor search process in the recent years. Median time to identify a suitable URD is now 2 months. More than 50% of Caucasian patients have an human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-allele donor match and a one-antigen or allele HLA-mismatched donor may also be acceptable. Complications of URD transplants are particularly frequent and severe, with long-term OS in the registries being 10-20% inferior to HLA-identical sibling transplantation. High resolution DNA techniques for donor and recipient HLA matching have contributed to the survival in experienced centres after unrelated donor SCT approaching that achieved with sibling donors. The introduction of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) has extended URD transplants to elderly and/or debilitated patients with AML. With this approach, TRM decreases, although graft-versus-host disease-related morbidity and mortality remain a problem. Despite this complication, results after URD transplantation in this age group seem better than those achieved with chemotherapy and/or autologous transplantation. To confirm this possibility, prospective multicenter comparisons of URD transplants after RIC with other treatment options for elderly AML patients have recently been started.     

Late infections after allogeneic bone marrow transplantations: comparison of incidence in related and unrelated donor transplant recipients

Infectious complications are a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). We have evaluated the incidence of late infections (beyond day +50) in recipients of related (RD) and unrelated donor (URD) allogeneic BMT, factors associated with increased risks of infection, and the impact of the late infections on survival. Between 1989 and 1991, 249 patients received an RD (n = 151) or URD (n = 98) allogeneic BMT at the University of Minnesota and all late infections were investigated. Three hundred sixty-seven late infectious events developed in 162 patients between 50 days and 2 years after BMT. The incidence of any late infection was greater in URD versus RD recipients (84.7% v 68.2%, respectively; P = .009). In multivariate analysis, advanced graft- versus-host disease (GVHD) was significantly associated with late infections. The effect of GVHD was apparent only in RD recipients (relative risk [RR], 2.29; P = .003), whereas URD recipients, with or without GVHD, had more late infections compared with RD recipients without GVHD. Multivariate analysis showed that late posttransplantation infections were the dominant independent factor associated with increased nonrelapse mortality (RR, 5.5; P = .0001), resulting in improved 3-year survival for RD versus URD recipients (49.9% +/- 8% v 34.4% +/- 10%; P = .004). In this study, we observed that late infections are more frequent in URD recipients, resulting in substantially higher nonrelapse mortality. This prolonged period of increased infectious risk in URD recipients suggests the need for aggressive surveillance and therapy of late infections and perhaps prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis for all URD BMT recipients.     

Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Taiwan

From January 1986 to December 1998, 26 (23%) of 114 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients older than 15 years were found to have Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. They accounted for 28% (26 of 94) of the patients with B-lineage ALL. Compared with the other 88 ALL patients, the leukemic cells from all but one Ph-positive ALL patients were early pre-B cells with a higher rate of CD34 expression (92% vs 50%, P<0.05). At presentation, the Ph-positive adult ALL patients had higher circulating blasts (mean 21.4 vs 3.66x10(4)/microl, P<0.05) and lower initial platelet counts (mean 4.47 vs 7.34x10(4)/microl, P<0.01) and showed a trend toward higher frequency of initial central nerve system (CNS) involvement (25% vs 11%, P=0.098) than the others. Among patients with adequate chemotherapy, 16 (64%) of the 25 Ph-positive ALL patients achieved complete remission (CR), an incidence marginally lower than that of Ph-negative ALL (62 of 76, 82%, P=0.06) and significantly lower than that of Ph-negative B-lineage ALL (50 of 58, 86%, P=0.0037). However, all patients relapsed except for those who received allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The probabilities of 5-year continuous CR and 5-year survival for Ph-positive adult ALL patients were significantly inferior to those for Ph-negative adult ALL patients (0% vs 12%, P=0.0001, and 7% vs 19%, P=0.047, respectively), and those for Ph-negative B-lineage ALL (0% vs 14%, P<0.0001, and 7% vs 23%, P=0.002, respectively). Prognostic factors were analyzed among the Ph-positive ALL patients including the 26 adults mentioned above and an additional 11 children. No clinical or biological characteristics such as age, sex, initial circulating blast count, extramedullary involvement, or CD34 expression had an impact on the disease outcome. Allo-HSCT in first CR may improve the probability of 5-year continuous CR (100% vs. 0% for those without allo-HSCT, P=0.0091) although only three patients received it in this study. In conclusion, Ph-positive ALL patients tended to have a poor prognosis, regardless of whether other possible risk factors were present or not. Aggressive treatment, such as high-dose chemotherapy with allo-HSCT, should be considered for these patients to improve survival.     

Post-remission treatment for adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission: is there a role for autologous stem cell transplantation?

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) or autologous SCT (autoSCT) and intensive consolidation/intensification courses plus maintenance chemotherapy for 1 to 2 years are currently the major options for post-remission treatment of adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first remission. Comparison of their value with respect to relapse prevention, disease-free survival, and overall survival has been impossible until recently when the results of several randomized trials became available. Herein, we try to dissect data from these randomized trials to evaluate the role of autoSCT in patients with ALL in complete remission. Five prospectively randomized trials were found in which patients with a family donor were eligible for an alloSCT and the remaining patients were randomized between autoSCT and continuation chemotherapy. In addition, in two prospectively randomized trials all patients with a donor were eligible for an alloSCT and the remaining patients were eligible for autoSCT. Using intention to treat, in the majority of ALL studies alloSCT is superior to autoSCT or intensive continuation chemotherapy. It still has to be determined which subgroups of ALL benefit most of allogeneic transplantation, since in some trials the advantage of allogeneic transplantation was confined to the standard-risk ALL patients and in other trials to the high-risk patients. With respect to the role of autoSCT compared to continuation chemotherapy, both treatment modalities show equal, although for high-risk ALL inferior, overall survival chances. In one large trial the disease-free survival in the autoSCT arm was inferior to that in the chemotherapy arm. This finding may eventually have an impact on the overall survival rate. Currently, the main benefit of autoSCT may be its short duration compared with the continuation chemotherapy regimen.     

The effect of allogeneic stem cell transplantation on outcome in younger acute myeloid leukemia patients with minimal residual disease detected by flow cytometry at the end of post-remission chemotherapy

Minimal residual disease (MRD) levels were determined by multi-parameter flow cytometry in 45 younger adult patients ( pound60 years old) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission. Data were collected after induction (MRD1; n=43) and/or at the end of post-remission chemotherapy or before stem cell transplantation (SCT)(MRD2; n=31). Patients with detectable MRD2 who underwent allogeneic or autologous SCT had significantly better 5-year relapse-free survival than patients not transplanted (80%, 53% and 0%, respectively p=0.003). Therefore allogeneic SCT should be considered in younger adult AML patients with detectable MRD at the end of post-remission chemotherapy. Autologous SCT may be an alternative for patients not eligible for allogeneic SCT.     

Intensive chemotherapy in patients with chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML) in accelerated or blastic phase--a report from the Swedish CML Group

In attempting to restore the chronic phase (CP) of chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML), the Swedish CML group utilized an intensive chemotherapy protocol for 83 patients (aged 16-79 years) in accelerated (AP, n = 22) or blastic phase (BC, n = 61). Most patients received a combination of mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2/d) and etoposide (100 mg/m2/d) together with cytosine arabinoside (1 g/m2 b.i.d) for 4 d. Overall, 39 patients (47%) achieved a second CP (CP2)/partial remission (PR). Responding patients < 65 years were eligible for ablative chemotherapy followed by an allogeneic (SCT) or a double autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Seventeen of 34 responders < 65 years failed to proceed to transplantation as a result of early disease progression (n = 15) or disease-related complications (n = 2). The remaining 17 patients underwent SCT (n = 9; including four unrelated donor SCT) or ASCT (n = 8). Only one of the eight ASCT patients had a second ASCT; the remaining seven failed because of progression (n = 5) or hypoplasia (n = 2). The median duration of CP2/PR was 6 months (range 1-72 months). Five patients achieved a longer CP2/PR than CP1. The 1 year survival was 70% for SCT/ASCT patients (median survival 21 months), 50% for responding patients overall, but only 7% for non-responders (P < 0.001). Three SCT/ASCT patients are long-term survivors (65+, 66+ and 73+ months). In conclusion, approximately half of the patients achieved a CP2/PR after intensive chemotherapy, with a clear survival advantage for responders vs non-responders. Subsequent SCT/ASCT was feasible for half of the responders (< 65 years), and one individual underwent double ASCT. Novel therapeutic options for CML patients in AP/BP are needed.     

Autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adult ALL: the Swedish Adult ALL Group experience

Adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) have been treated according to national protocols in Sweden since 1986. Stem cell transplantation (SCT) has been recommended in first remission for patients with risk factors for relapse, and for standard risk patients only after relapse. In this retrospective study, the results of autologous and allogeneic SCT in these populations were evaluated. In total, 187 patients with a median age of 34 years (17-66 years) underwent SCT. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), for all patients, was 26% (Confidence intervals (CI) 20-32%). The 5-year DFS was higher for patients transplanted in first remission 32% (CI 24-40%) compared to 14% (CI 5-23%; P<0.0001) in patients transplanted beyond first remission. No significant differences in DFS (P=0.06) were determined between autologous, related donor and unrelated donor SCT in the whole cohort. A lower relapse rate was counterbalanced by higher treatment-related mortality in patients undergoing allogeneic SCT. In Philadelphia-positive ALL, allogeneic SCT was superior to autologous SCT, with a 5-year DFS of 30% (CI 12-47%) vs 0% (P=0.04). Limited chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) was associated with an improved DFS of 53% (CI 38-69%) compared to no chronic GVHD of 22% (CI 10-36%; P=0.0008), indicating a clinically important graft-versus-leukaemia effect.     

High-dose busulphan alone as cytoreduction before allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukaemia: a single-centre experience

Transplant-related morbidity and mortality remain a major problem following stem cell transplantation (SCT). The use of high-dose single-agent busulphan before allogeneic or autologous SCT may be a reasonable compromise between maintaining cytoreductive efficacy and minimizing toxicity in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Seventy patients with CML have received busulphan as the only cytoreductive therapy before SCT on 79 occasions. The probability of survival of the 14 allogeneic recipients (all of whom were undergoing a second transplant from the original donor) was 78% at 5 years. Sixty-five autologous SCT were performed in 56 patients, of whom 40 were in late chronic phase. The actuarial 3-year post-autograft survival was 54% for these 56 first autografts. For patients in chronic phase, the 3-year survival was 76% compared with 30% at 2 years for those with advanced phase disease. Busulphan therapy was well tolerated, and except for mild mucositis little toxicity was experienced. None of these patients developed hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD). Nine patients (one allogeneic and eight autologous recipients) received several doses of an intravenous formulation of busulphan with very low toxicity. High-dose busulphan alone appears sufficient to provide adequate cytoreduction and immunosuppression in second allogeneic transplants and is also effective as cytoreduction before autologous SCT in patients with CML.     

Autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantations for poor-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia

We report here on the long-term follow-up on 162 patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) at a single center from 1989 to 1999. Twenty-five patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors underwent T-cell-depleted allogeneic SCT, and 137 patients without HLA-matched sibling donors underwent autologous SCT. The 100-day mortality was 4% for both groups, but later morbidity and mortality were negatively affected on outcome. Progression-free survival was significantly longer following autologous than allogeneic SCT, but there was no difference in overall survival and no difference in the cumulative incidence of disease recurrence or deaths without recurrence between the 2 groups. At a median follow-up of 6.5 years there is no evidence of a plateau of progression-free survival. The majority of patients treated with donor lymphocyte infusions after relapse responded, demonstrating a significant graft-versus-leukemia effect in CLL. From these findings we have altered our approach for patients with high-risk CLL and are currently exploring the role of related and unrelated allogeneic SCT following reduced-intensity conditioning regimens.     

Unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation: influence of HLA A and B incompatibility on outcome

We have studied the outcome of 211 consecutive unrelated donor (URD) bone marrow transplants (BMT) performed at the University of Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN) between May 1985 and December 1992. Ninety patients (43%) received marrow matched serologically at HLA A, B, and DR loci; 86 (41%) received marrow with a major and 32 (15%) marrow with a minor serologic mismatch at the HLA A or B locus. Multivariate analysis revealed that older age had an adverse effect on survival. In younger (age less than 18 years) recipients, survival after fully matched (A, B, and DR sub-type) or major mismatched (A or B locus), DR subtype- matched donor BMT was not significantly different (P = .4; survival: 53% v 41%, respectively, at 3 years). For adults, survival after matched donor BMT was significantly better than that with mismatched donors (P < .01; survival: 30% v 10%, respectively, at 3 years). Formal quality of life assessment by telephone interview demonstrated similar functional status in survivors of URD and related donor (RD) BMT at least 2 years post-BMT. URD BMT provides effective therapy for a variety of lethal hematopoietic diseases that rivals outcome of RD transplant in some cases. Use of URD marrow with a major mismatch at one HLA A or B locus is well tolerated in young, but not in older, recipients. These observations should be used to improve donor selection and counseling for URD BMT candidates.     

Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia showing normal karyotype in G-banding chromosomal examination before chemotherapy

A 29-year-old male was admitted because of thrombocytopenia. A diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia was made on the basis of a 61.6% infiltration of leukemic cells in his bone marrow. Standard G-binding chromosome analysis of bone marrow cells revealed a normal karyotype. He received combination chemotherapy, and achieved hematological complete remission. However, chromosomal analysis of bone marrow cells after 2 courses of consolidation therapy showed the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome in two cells out of 20 analysed. We retrospectively examined the sample of bone marrow cells before chemotherapy; It showed minor BCR/ABL positivity with FISH and RT-PCR methods. The Ph chromosome disappeared after consolidation chemotherapy and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, but the Ph chromosome reappeared at relapse. We postulated that there were two clones, both a Ph-positive clone and Ph-negative clone. At the initial diagnosis, Ph chromosome was not detected because the G-banding method analyzed only metaphase cells, which contained few Ph-positive clones. In order to offer effective therapy with molecular targeting agents, in this poor prognostic disease, it is necessary to detect Ph chromosome before the first chemotherapy and BCR/ABL detection with FISH or RT-PCR methods appears more useful than G-banding chromosome analysis.     

Comparison of allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in first remission: a prospective controlled trial

Eighty-five adult patients under the age of 50 years with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) were entered into a prospective controlled study conducted to compare the effectiveness of allogeneic or autologous bone marrow transplantation and intensive chemotherapy for patients in first complete remission. Sixty-one patients (72%) achieved complete remission then received a consolidation treatment. After consolidation, 58 patients who were still in remission were assigned to three different therapeutic modalities. Fifty-two patients were evaluable: 20 patients who had an HLA-identical sibling donor underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation within 3 months after achievement of complete remission; the other 32 patients were randomized to receive autologous bone marrow transplantation or intensive sequential chemotherapy. The actuarial risk of relapse at 3 years was 18% for the allogeneic patients, 50% for the autologous patients and 83% in the chemotherapy group. The difference was highly significant (P less than 0.0002). The disease-free survival was respectively 66% (95% confidence interval 41-85%), 41% (95% confidence interval 16-66%) and 16% (95% confidence interval 0-31%) (P less than 0.004). We conclude that allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is presently the best therapeutic approach for patients with AML in first complete remission.     

Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia showing normal karyotype in G-banding chromosomal examination before chemotherapy

A 29-year-old male was admitted because of thrombocytopenia. A diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia was made on the basis of a 61.6% infiltration of leukemic cells in his bone marrow. Standard G-binding chromosome analysis of bone marrow cells revealed a normal karyotype. He received combination chemotherapy, and achieved hematological complete remission. However, chromosomal analysis of bone marrow cells after 2 courses of consolidation therapy showed the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome in two cells out of 20 analysed. We retrospectively examined the sample of bone marrow cells before chemotherapy; It showed minor BCR/ABL positivity with FISH and RT-PCR methods. The Ph chromosome disappeared after consolidation chemotherapy and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, but the Ph chromosome reappeared at relapse. We postulated that there were two clones, both a Ph-positive clone and Ph-negative clone. At the initial diagnosis, Ph chromosome was not detected because the G-banding method analyzed only metaphase cells, which contained few Ph-positive clones. In order to offer effective therapy with molecular targeting agents, in this poor prognostic disease, it is necessary to detect Ph chromosome before the first chemotherapy and BCR/ABL detection with FISH or RT-PCR methods appears more useful than G-banding chromosome analysis.     

Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia with hyper-CVAD and imatinib mesylate

Imatinib mesylate, an inhibitor of the Bcr-Abl tyrosine kinase, has modest activity in refractory/relapsed Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). Use of concurrent chemotherapy and imatinib mesylate in newly diagnosed Ph-positive ALL was explored. There were 20 patients who received hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, Adriamycin, and dexamethasone) and imatinib mesylate followed by imatinib mesylate-based consolidation/maintenance therapy. Of these patients, 11 had de novo disease, 4 were primary failures after induction (without imatinib mesylate), and 5 were in complete remission (CR) after induction (without imatinib mesylate). All 15 patients treated for active disease achieved CR. Within a median of 3.5 months in first CR, 10 patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). One patient relapsed after matched related SCT. The other 9 patients remained alive in CR with median follow-up of 12 months after SCT (range, 1+ to 17+ months). Among 10 patients ineligible for (no donor or older age) or refusing allogeneic SCT, 1 patient relapsed after one year. There were 5 patients who remained alive in continuous CR for a median of 20 months (range, 4+ to 24+ months), with 2 older patients dying in CR at 15 and 16 months of comorbid conditions. Molecular CRs were achieved in both groups (SCT or no SCT). Outcome with hyper-CVAD and imatinib mesylate appears better than with prior regimens; continued accrual and longer follow-up of the current cohort is needed.     

Outcome of peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in advanced phases of CML is dependent on the type of chemotherapy applied

 High-dose chemotherapy with autologous transplantation of in vivo purged PBSC is a novel investigational approach to treating chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients not responsive to conventional therapy with interferon-α (IFN-α) and not eligible for allogeneic transplantation. PBSC mobilization using either '5+2/7+3'-type chemotherapy or 'mini-ICE/ICE' chemotherapy was investigated in 43 patients with advanced phases of Philadelphia (Ph)-positive CML. Thirty patients were in late chronic phase (>12 months post diagnosis) and 13 patients in accelerated phase (AP) or blast crisis (BC). Contamination with Ph-positive cells was evaluated in harvests from 37/43 patients. The outcome of PBSC mobilization was dependent on the type of chemotherapy administered: a complete or major cytogenetic response (<35% Ph-positive metaphases) in leukapheresis collections was obtained in ten of 15 patients treated with 'mini-ICE/ICE' but in only three of 28 patients treated with '5+2/7+3' chemotherapy. One patient (1/43) in blast crisis died during mobilization therapy (2%). Twenty-five patients underwent PBSC transplantation and all of them engrafted successfully. Transplantation-related mortality was 0%. The data show that in advanced phases of CML the chance of harvesting Ph-negative peripheral blood stem cells depends on the type of chemotherapy used for mobilization. Received: February 6, 1998 / Accepted: May 19, 1998     

Multicenter Prospective Study of Interferon α versus Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with New Diagnoses of Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

We compared interferon α (IFN-α) therapy with stem cell transplantation (SCT) for patients with chronic-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia in a multicenter prospective study to investigate the optimal indication and timing of SCT, especially from HLA-matched unrelated donors. Of 257 eligible patients, 145 patients who were younger than 50 years were assigned to the IFN-α cohort (n = 87) or the SCT cohort (n = 58), according to family donor availability. In the IFN-α cohort, 52 patients received IFN-α and chemotherapy (the IFN1 group), and 35 patients received an SCT from an unrelated donor (the U-SCT group). In the SCT cohort, 47 patients received an SCT from a related donor (the R-SCT group). In the IFN1 group, 88% of the patients achieved a complete hematologic response, and 33% achieved a complete cytogenetic response. At a median follow-up period of 53 months, the predicted 6-year survival rate was 72% in the IFN1 group, 81% in the R-SCT group, and 81% in the U-SCT group. When overall survival was evaluated for the IFN-α and R-SCT cohorts by intention to treat according to family donor availability, the 6-year survival rates were 76% and 84%, respectively. When the outcomes of the U-SCT and IFN1 groups were compared, the survival rate of U-SCT group patients was significantly better than for IFN1 group patients without a major cytogenetic response and seemed better for IFN1 group patients younger than 35 years. Therefore, U-SCT may be recommendable to patients who fail to achieve a major cytogenetic response in IFN-α therapy and to younger patients.     

Stem cell transplantation in adult ALL patients

Less than 40% of adult acute lymphocytic leukaemia (ALL) patients will still be alive at 5 years post-diagnosis. Ways to improve patients' outcome, using high-dose therapy followed by autologous/allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in first complete remission (CR1) rather than consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy, have been investigated. However, prospective studies are small and results are inconclusive. The largest prospective trial ever being performed in adult ALL patients, the ongoing UKALL 12/ECOG 2993 trial, is assigning all patients who have a sibling donor to receive allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) in CR1, whereas all other patients are randomized to continue chemotherapy versus autologous SCT. An interim analysis of this trial seems to support an alloSCT in first CR in adult ALL patients (reflected by a significantly reduced relapse rate with an improved disease-free survival). However, less than 30% of the patients have a matched sibling donor, the majority of the patients are over 40 years old, which makes them less suitable for conventional allograft, and even in those who have a matched sibling donor and are young and fit enough to receive it the treatment-related mortality (TRM) is about 20%. Strategies for expanding donor availability, meanwhile, to reduce the TRM, remain challenges. Data regarding the efficacy of reduced-intensity regimens in ALL patients are still scanty. Another way of improving patient outcome is to select patients for allograft more carefully. There are enough data to suggest now that children who achieved a clinical remission but failed to obtain a molecular/immunological remission are more prone to relapse. Similar data have recently been published for adult ALL. However, data are still limited, and the significance of minimal residual disease (MRD) has never been studied prospectively in adult ALL patients. A reasonable approach is to assign all patients with a matched related donor who has failed to achieve a molecular/immunological remission to receive a conventional alloSCT, whereas all others might be randomized to receive alloSCT versus chemotherapy/autologousSCT. However, patients with Ph(+) ALL who have a donor should receive an alloSCT in CR1, regardless of their MRD results.It appears that alloSCT provides the best chance for cure. However, by improving our ability to select those who have the highest risk for relapse, unnecessary toxicity/mortality might be prevented and the general outcome might improve.     

Consolidative therapy with stem cell transplantation improves survival of patients with mantle cell lymphoma after any induction regimen

Intensive induction regimen followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) is frequently used to improve outcomes in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma. The comparative impact of conventional vs intensive induction regimen before transplantation is unknown. Forty-eight patients with mantle-cell lymphoma receiving SCT at our institution between January 2000 and December 2010 were included in this study. At the time of initial presentation, 43 (89.5%) had stage IV disease and 18 (37.5%) received more than one chemotherapy regimen before transplantation. Forty patients underwent auto-SCT and 7 had allogeneic SCT (allo-SCT); 1 patient had an allo-SCT for relapsed disease after auto-SCT. At the time of this analysis (median follow-up of 6 years from diagnosis and 4 years from transplantation), 40 patients (88%) were alive with a 5-year disease-free survival of 74.8%. Age, disease stage, number of regimens pre-SCT, pre-SCT disease status, and type of SCT had no impact on long-term outcomes. Importantly, there were no differences among the types of induction regimen on outcomes in this cohort receiving SCT. Based on our data, we believe that future studies should focus on strategies to prevent disease relapse rather than comparing induction regimens before stem cell transplantation.