Correlation between egfr expression and accelerated proliferation during radiotherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

ABSTRACT: Purpose To investigate the correlation between the expression of Epidermal Growth Factor receptor (EGFr) and the reduction of the effective doubling time (TD) during radiotherapy treatment and also to determine the dose per fraction to be taken into account when the overall treatment time (OTT) is reduced in accelerated radiotherapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: A survey of the published papers comparing 3-years of local regional control rate (LCR) for a total of 2162 patients treated with conventional and accelerated radiotherapy and with a pretreatment assessment of EGFr expression, was made. Different values of TD were obtained by a model incorporating the overall time corrected biologically effective dose (BED) and a 3-year clinical LCR for high and low EGFr groups of patients (HEGFr and LEGFr), respectively. By obtaining the TD from the above analysis and the sub-sites' potential doubling time (Tpot) from flow cytometry and immunohistochemical methods, we were able to estimate the average TD for each sub-site included in the analysis. Moreover, the dose that would be required to offset the modified proliferation occurring in one day (Dprolif), was estimated. RESULTS: The averages of TD were 77 (27-90)95% days in LEGFr and 8.8 (7.3-11.0)95% days in HEGFr, if an onset of accelerated proliferation TK at day 21 was assumed. The correspondent HEGFr sub-sites' TD were 5.9 (6.6), 5.9 (6.6), 4.6 (6.1), 14.3 (12.9) days, with respect to literature immunohistochemical (flow cytometry) data of Tpot for Oral-Cavity, Oro-pharynx, Hypo-pharynx, and Larynx respectively. The Dprolif for the HEGFr groups were 0.33 (0.29), 0.33 (0.29), 0.42 (0.31), 0.14 (0.15) Gy/day if alpha = 0.3 Gy-1 and alpha/beta = 10 Gy were assumed. CONCLUSIONS: A higher expression of the EGFr leads to enhanced proliferation. This study allowed to quantify the extent of the effect which EGFr expression has in terms of reduced TD and Dprolif for each head and neck sub-site.     

Influence of overall treatment time and radiobiological parameters on biologically effective doses in cervical cancer patients treated with radiation therapy alone

The aim of the study was to examine the influence of overall treatment time (OTT) on the value of calculated biological effective doses (BEDs) for different biological variables. These variables were: tumour proliferation rate, different cell radiosensitivity (alpha=0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 /Gy), and different start time for repopulation (Tk=21, 28, and 35 days). Also the influence of age (), Hb level (), tumor proliferation rate (bromodeoxyuridine labelling index; BrdUrdLI), and DNA ploidy on survival after shorter (60 days) OTT was investigated. The study included 229 patients with cervix carcinoma treated entirely by standard radiotherapy (RT) (external beam RT plus low-medium dose-rate (LDR/MDR) brachytherapy (BT) at the Center of Oncology in Krakow. The linear quadratic equation was used to calculate BED, which is proportional to log cell kill. BEDs 10 (for tumours) were calculated with consideration of OTT for each patient and tumour proliferation rate (standardized potential doubling time; standardized Tpot) based on BrdUrdLI assessed on biopsy material before RT. Median OTT was 90 days (range 30-210). The mean calculated total BED for point A for tumour and 'early reactions' was equal to 103.0 Gy10. The longest median survival time--52 months--was seen for patients treated with OTT 8.8%) BED loss was 1.4 Gy/day and for slowly proliferating tumours (BrdUrdLI 50 years (p=0.003) and high Hb level (>116 g/l) (p=0.041). For longer treatments (OTT >60 days) the unfavourable parameters were: age 相似文献   

Early mucosal reactions during and after head-and-neck radiotherapy: dependence of treatment tolerance on radiation dose and schedule duration

PURPOSE: To more precisely localize the dose-time boundary between head-and-neck radiotherapy schedules inducing tolerable and intolerable early mucosal reactions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Total cell-kill biologically effective doses (BED(CK)) have been calculated for 84 schedules, including incomplete repair effects, but making no other corrections for the effect of schedule duration T. [BED(CK),T] scatterplots are graphed, overlying BED(CKboundary)(T) curves on the plots and using discriminant analysis to optimize BED(CKboundary)(T) to best represent the boundary between the tolerable and intolerable schedules. RESULTS: More overlap than expected is seen between the tolerable and intolerable treatments in the 84-schedule [BED(CK),T] scatterplot, but this was largely eliminated by removing gap and tolerated accelerating schedules from the plot. For the remaining 57 predominantly regular schedules, the BED(CKboundary)(T) boundary increases with increasing T (p = 0.0001), curving upwards significantly nonlinearly (p = 0.00007) and continuing to curve beyond 15 days (p = 0.035). The regular schedule BED(CKboundary)(T) boundary does not describe tolerability well for accelerating schedules (p = 0.002), with several tolerated accelerating schedules lying above the boundary where regular schedules would be intolerable. Gap schedule tolerability also is not adequately described by the regular schedule boundary (p = 0.04), although no systematic offset exists between the regular boundary and the overall gap schedule tolerability pattern. CONCLUSIONS: All schedules analyzed (regular, gap, and accelerating) with BED(CK) values below BED(CKboundary)(T)=69.5x(T/32.2)/sin((T/32.2)((radians)))-3.5Gy(10)(forT< or =50 days) are tolerable, and many lying above the boundary are intolerable. The accelerating schedules analyzed were tolerated better overall than are the regular schedules with similar [BED(CK),T] values.     

Biological factors influencing optimum fractionation in radiation therapy.

Optimum fractionation in radiotherapy occurs when tumor control is improved without enhancement of complications. The main influence on choice of overall time, total dose and fraction size is biological: the proliferation status of tumors. For rapidly proliferating tumors, shorter schedules than 6 to 8 weeks are necessary. Optimum overall time is similar to Tk, the time after beginning cytotoxic treatment when rapid proliferation in tumors starts: 21 to 35 days in head and neck tumors. These, and non-small cell lung tumors, have a clonogenic cell doubling time during radiotherapy of about 3 days. New developments in designing optimum schedules for such tumors are presented: carefully regulated hypofractionation (CRH). For slowly proliferating tumors, especially prostate adenocarcinoma, intracellular repair is large, so larger doses per fraction will be necessary. New evidence is presented showing that their alpha/beta ratio may indeed be lower than 3 Gy. For an entirely different reason from that above, hypofractionation should be tested.     

Radical radiotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: What dose and fractionation schedule to choose?

PURPOSE: To establish the alpha/beta ratio of bladder cancer from different radiotherapy schedules reported in the literature and provide guidelines for the design of new treatment schemes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and five brachytherapy schedules were selected. The biologically effective dose (BED) of each schedule was calculated. Logistic modeling was used to describe the relationship between 3-year local control (LC3y) and BED. RESULTS: The estimated alpha/beta ratio was 13 Gy (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-69 Gy) for EBRT and 24 Gy (95% CI, 1.3-460 Gy) for EBRT and brachytherapy combined. There is evidence for an overall dose-response relationship. After an increase in total dose of 10 Gy, the odds of LC3y increase by a factor of 1.44 (95% CI, 1.23-1.70) for EBRT and 1.47 (95% CI, 1.25-1.72) for the data sets of EBRT and brachytherapy combined. CONCLUSION: With the clinical data currently available, a reliable estimation of the alpha/beta ratio for bladder cancer is not feasible. It seems reasonable to use a conventional alpha/beta ratio of 10-15 Gy. Dose escalation could significantly increase local control. There is no evidence to support short overall treatment times or large fraction sizes in radiotherapy for bladder cancer.     

Simultaneous integrated boost for breast cancer using IMRT: a radiobiological and treatment planning study

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to explore the possibility of using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to deliver the boost dose to the tumor bed simultaneously with the whole-breast IMRT to reduce the radiation treatment time by 1-2 weeks. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The biologically effective dose (BED) for different treatments was calculated using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model with parameters previously derived for breast cancer from clinical data (alpha/beta = 10Gy, alpha = 0.3Gy(-1)). A potential doubling time of 15 days (from in vitro measurements) for breast cancer and a generic alpha/beta ratio of 3 Gy for normal tissues were used. A series of regimens that use IMRT as initial treatment and an IMRT simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) were derived using biologic equivalence to conventional schedules. Possible treatment plans with IMRT SIB to the tumor bed were generated for 2 selected breast patients, 1 with a shallow tumor and 1 with a deep-seated tumor. Plans with a simultaneous integrated electron boost were also generated for comparison. Dosimetric merits of these plans were evaluated based on dose volume histograms. RESULTS: A commonly used conventional treatment of 45 Gy (1.8 Gy x 25) to the whole breast and then a boost of 20 Gy (2 Gy x 10) is biologically equivalent to an alternative plan of 1.8 Gy x 25 to the whole breast with a 2.4 Gy x 25 SIB to the tumor bed. The new regime reduces treatment time from 7 to 5 weeks. For the patient with a deep-seated tumor, the IMRT plans reduce the volume of the breast that receives high doses (compared with the conventional photon boost plan) and provides good coverage of the target volumes. CONCLUSION: It is biologically and dosimetrically feasible to reduce the overall treatment time for breast radiotherapy by using an IMRT simultaneous integrated boost. For selected patient groups, IMRT plans with a new regimen can be equal to or better than conventional plans.     

The effect of increasing the treatment time beyond three weeks on the control of T2 and T3 laryngeal cancer using radiotherapy.

Local control of cancer by radiotherapy may be prejudiced by accelerated tumour clonogen repopulation particularly during protracted treatment schedules. A series of 496 cases of T2 and T3 larynx cancer treated here by radiotherapy has been studied to examine the impact on local control of treatment durations ranging from 9 to 41 days. Data were analysed using a linear-quadratic formulation describing the fractionation sensitivity, with the incorporation of a parameter relating to treatment time. Using combined T2 and T3 data, the increase in dose required to maintain a constant local control (the time factor) was between 0.5 and 0.6 Gy per day. These values are similar to those reported for 4 weeks or more in the literature. Also, the calculated dose to control 50% of tumours, given over the standard Christie duration of 21 days, was on the line projected back from literature data over 28-66 days. The present data are consistent with the presence of such a time factor following a lag phase of not more than 3 weeks after starting radiotherapy. Hence, further consideration should be given to using shorter overall treatment times in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.     

How worthwhile are short schedules in radiotherapy? A series of exploratory calculations

A series of calculations is presented of log cell kill for most of the fractionated schedules that could conceivably be devised using 1, 2 or 3 fractions per day and 3, 5 or 7 treatment days per week, in overall times of 1 to 7 weeks inclusive. The basic assumption is that late reactions are kept constant, and that repair of sublethal damage is complete, i.e. intervals are at least 6 h. A wide range of effective doubling times of tumor cells is assumed: 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, 20 days and infinity. The results show that optimum overall times depend primarily on (1) the doubling time for cells in the tumor and (2) the intrinsic radiosensitivity alpha (which is proportional to alpha/beta in one of the assumptions made here). Optimum overall times are proportional to (1) but can increase even more steeply with increasing radiosensitivity or alpha/beta. Short overall times are required for tumors with low alpha/beta and/or fast proliferation. Optimum overall times are, interestingly, relatively independent of the number and frequency of fractions. However, therapeutic ratios are higher if larger numbers of smaller fractions are used within the selected overall time. This is a critical factor in achieving adequate tumor cell kill. For median potential doubling times of 5 days, and median radiosensitivity, overall times of 2.5 to 4 weeks would be optimal. More slowly proliferating tumors, possibly about half of many types of carcinoma, should be treated with longer overall times, but selection is necessary. Doubling or halving the cell doubling time would mean 5-8 or 1.2-2 weeks overall time, respectively. Similarly, for a 5 day doubling time, a tumor with alpha/beta = 5 Gy should be treated in less than a week; but if alpha/beta = 20 Gy the optimum overall time could exceed 7 or 8 weeks. A tumor with cells that double in 3 days would require overall times of 0.3, 2.5 and 6.5 weeks for alpha/beta values of 5, 10 and 20 Gy, respectively. Acute effects (excluded in the analysis) would disqualify some of the shorter schedules. We can hope to know potential doubling times (from flow cytometry) and eventually values of alpha (and alpha/beta). It is important that assays of both should continue to be developed. When such individual values are available, optimum overall times can be chosen, as described here, within which the maximum practicable number of small fractions can be given.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

How Much Radiation is the Chemotherapy Worth in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer?

PURPOSE: To estimate the radiotherapeutic dose equivalence of chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancer. METHODS: The biologic equivalent dose (BED) of radiotherapy in nine trials of standard and five trials of modified fractionated radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy was calculated using the linear-quadratic formulation. Data from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) study 90-03 were used to calculate the relationship (S) between increase in locoregional control (LRC) and increase in BED with modified vs. standard fractionated radiotherapy. The increase in LRC with chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone, the BED of the radiotherapy-alone arms, and the "S" value were used to calculate the BED contribution from chemotherapy and the total BED of chemoradiotherapy from each study. RESULTS: From RTOG 90-03, a 1% increase in BED yields a 1.1% increase in LRC. The mean BED of standard fractioned radiotherapy was 60.2 Gy(10) and 66 Gy(10) for modified fractionation. The mean BED of standard fractionated chemoradiotherapy was 71 Gy(10) (10.8 Gy(10) contributed by chemotherapy). The mean BED of modified fractionated chemoradiotherapy was 76 Gy(10) (10.4 Gy(10) contributed by chemotherapy). CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy increases BED by approximately 10 Gy(10) in standard and modified fractionated radiotherapy, equivalent to a dose escalation of 12 Gy in 2 Gy daily or 1.2 Gy twice daily. Such an escalation could not be safely achieved by increasing radiation dose alone.     

Clinical implications of incomplete repair parameters for rat spinal cord: the feasibility of large doses per fraction in PDR and HDR brachytherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical implications of the repair parameters determined experimentally in rat spinal cord and to test the feasibility of large doses per fraction or pulses in daytime high-dose-rate (HDR) or pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy treatment schedules as an alternative to continuous low-dose-rate (CLDR) brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: BED calculations with the incomplete repair LQ-model were performed for a primary CLDR-brachytherapy treatment of 70 Gy in 140 h or a typical boost protocol of 25 Gy in 50 h after 46-Gy conventional external beam irradiation (ERT) at 2 Gy per fraction each day. Assuming biphasic repair kinetics and a variable dose rate for the iridium-192- (192Ir) stepping source, the LQ-model parameters for rat spinal cord as derived in three different experimental studies were used: (a) two repair processes with an alpha/beta ratio = 2.47 Gy and repair half-times of 0.2 h (12 min) and 2.2 h (Pop et. al.); (b) two repair processes with an alpha/beta ratio = 2.0 Gy and repair half-times of 0.7 h (42 min) and 3.8 h (Ang et al.); and (c) two repair processes with an alpha/beta ratio = 2.0 Gy and repair half-times of 0.25 h (15 min) and 6.4 h (Landuyt et al.). For tumor tissue, an alpha/beta ratio of 10 Gy and a monoexponential repair half time of 0.5 h was assumed. The calculated BED values were compared with the biologic effect of a clinical reference dose of conventional ERT with 2 Gy/day and complete repair between the fractions. Subsequently, assuming a two-catheter implant similar to that used in our experimental study and with the repair parameters derived in our rat model, BED calculations were performed for alternative PDR- and HDR-brachytherapy treatment schedules, in which the irradiation was delivered only during daytime. RESULTS: If the repair parameters of the study of Pop et al., Ang et al., or Landuyt et al. are used, for a CLDR-treatment of 70 Gy in 140 h, the calculated BED values were 117, 193, or 216 Gy(sc) (Gy(sc) was used to express the BED value for the spinal cord), respectively. These BED values correspond with total doses of conventional ERT of 65, 96, or 104 Gy. The latter two are unrealistic high values and illustrate the danger of a straightforward comparison of BED values if repair parameters are used in situations quite different from those in which they were derived. For a brachytherapy boost protocol, the impact of the different repair parameters is less, due to the fact that the percentage increase in total BED value by the brachytherapy boost is less than 50%.If a primary treatment with CLDR brachytherapy delivering 70 Gy in 140 h has to be replaced, high doses per fraction or pulses (> 1 Gy) during daytime can only be used if the overall treatment time is prolonged with 3-4 days. The dose rate during the fraction or pulse should not exceed 6 Gy/h. For a typical brachytherapy boost protocol after 46 Gy ERT, it seems to be safe to replace CLDR delivering a total dose of 25 Gy in 50 h by a total dose of 24 Gy in 4 days with HDR or PDR brachytherapy during daytime only. Total dose per day should be limited to 6 Gy, and the largest time interval as possible between each fraction or pulse should be used. CONCLUSION: Extrapolations based on longer repair half-times in a CLDR reference scheme may lead to the calculation of unrealistically high BED values and dangerously high doses for alternative HDR and PDR treatment schedules. Based on theoretical calculations with the IR model and using the repair parameters derived in our rat spinal cord model, it is estimated that with certain restrictions, large doses per fraction or pulses can be used during daytime schedules of HDR or PDR brachytherapy as an alternative to CLDR brachytherapy, especially for those treatment conditions in which brachytherapy is used after ERT for only less than 50% of the total dose.     

A multi-institutional retrospective analysis of external radiotherapy for mucosal melanoma of the head and neck in Northern Japan

PURPOSE: A multi-institutional retrospective study was performed in northern Japan to analyze the outcome of external radiotherapy as the definitive treatment modality for localized mucosal melanoma of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients with localized mucosal melanoma of the head and neck treated by external radiotherapy at nine institutions of the Northern Japan Radiation Therapy Oncology Group between 1980 and 1999 were enrolled in this study. Radiotherapy alone was performed in 21 patients, and the remaining 10 patients received postoperative radiotherapy for gross residual tumors. The fraction size of radiotherapy varied from 1.5-13.8 Gy, with the total dose ranging from 32-64 Gy (median, 50 Gy). The follow-up periods ranged from 1-214 months (median, 16 months). RESULTS: Complete or partial responses were observed in 9 patients (29%) and 18 patients (58%), respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 13 patients (41.9%) and distant metastasis occurred in 11 patients (35.5%). Most incidences of local recurrence and distant metastasis developed within 2 years after the initial treatment. Overall cause-specific survival rates of patients at 1 and 3 years were 73% and 33%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that high dose per fractionated radiotherapy doses (>or=3 Gy) was associated with better prognosis for both local control (p = 0.048) and survival (p = 0.045). Multivariate analysis indicated that age (better prognosis in younger patients, p = 0.046) was the only significant factor. Radiotherapy for gross residual lesions after surgery did not seem to impact the significant gain of local control and survival. We observed two fatal late complications of mucosal ulcer and bleeding in the high dose per fractionated radiotherapy group. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy at a dose of 3 Gy or more per fraction was effective in gaining local control in patients with localized mucosal melanoma of the head and neck, and subsequently better survival was possible, especially in younger patients.     

Fractionation in medium dose rate brachytherapy of cancer of the cervix

: To established an optimum fractionation for medium dose rate (MDR) brachytherapy from retrospective data of patients treated with different MDR schedules in comparison with a low dose rate (LDR) schedule.

: The study population consists of consecutive Stage IB-IIA-IIB patients who received radiotherapy alone with full dose brachytherapy plus external beam pelvic and parametrial irradiation from 1986–1993. Patients also receiving surgery or chemotherapy were excluded. The LDR group (n = 102, median follow-up: 80 months) received a median dose to Point A of 32.5 Gy fractions at 0.44 Gy/h plus 18 Gy of external whole pelvic irradiation. The MDR1 group (n = 30, median follow-up: 45 months) received a mean dose of two 32 Gy fractions at 1.68 Gy/h. An individual dose reduction of 12.5% was planned for this group according to the Manchester experience, but only a 4.8% dose reduction was achieved. The MDR2 group (n = 10, median follow-up: 36 months) received a dose of two 24 Gy fractions at 1.65 Gy/h. The MDR3 group (n = 10, median follow-up 33 months_ received a mean dose of three 15.3 Gy fractions at 1.64 Gy/h. And finally, the MDR4 group (n = 38, median follow-up: 24 months)_received six six 7.7 Gy fractions from two pulses 6 h apart in each of three insertions at 1.61 Gy/h/ The median external pelvic dose to MDR schedules was between 12 and 20 Gy. The linear quadratic (LQ) formula was used to calculate the biologically effective dose (BED) to tumor (BED) to tumor (Gy₁₀) and rectum (Gy₃), assuming T1/2 for REPAIR = 1.5 h.

: The crude central recurrence rate was 6% for LDR (mean BED - 95.4 Gy₁₀) and 10% for MDR4 (mean BED = 77.0 Gy₁₀ (p = NS). The remaining MDR groups had no recurrences. Grade 2 and 3 rectal or bladder complications were 0% for LDR (rectal BED = 109 Gy₃), 83% for MDR1 (BED = 206 Gy₃), and 30% for MDR3 (BED = 127 Gy₃). The MDR2 and MDR4 groups presented no complications (BED, 123 Gy₃, and 105 Gy₃, respectively). The LQ formula appears to correlate with late complications of the different MDR regimens. A BED above 125 Gy₃ was associated with Grade 2+3 rectal complications. Adequate central tumor control may be compromised with a tumor BED below 90–95 Gy₁₀.

: Medium dose rate brachytherapy at 1.6 Gy/h to point A has a marked dose ratre effect. Increased fractionation is the cost of overcoming the less favorable therapeutic ratio for MDR than for LDR. A larger (25%) reduction of brachytherapy dose than previously reported is also necessary. Our most recently developed schedule for Stage I–II patients is three insertions on three treatment days with six 8.0 Gy brachytherapy fractions, two on each treatment day, following or preceding an external whole pelvis dose of 18 Gy, and followed by additional external parametrial dose.     

Relevance of biologically equivalent dose values in outcome evaluation of stereotactic radiotherapy for lung nodules

PURPOSE: Different biologically equivalent dose (BED) values associated with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) of patients with primary and metastatic pulmonary nodules were studied. The BED values were calculated for tumoral tissue and low alpha/beta ratio, assuming that better local response could be obtained by using stereotactic high-BED treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-eight patients with T1-T3 N0 non-small-cell lung cancer and 46 patients with metastatic lung nodules were treated with SRT. The BED was calculated for alpha/beta ratios of 3 and 10. Overall survival (OS) was assessed according to Kaplan-Meier and appraised as a function of three BED levels: low (30-50 Gy), medium (50-70 Gy), and high (70-98 Gy; alpha/beta = 10). RESULTS: The OS rates for all 104 patients at 12, 24, and 36 months were 73%, 48.3%, and 35.8%, respectively. Local response greater than 50% for low, medium, and high BED values was observed in 54%, 47%, and 73%, respectively. In the high-BED treated group, OS rates at 12, 24, and 36 months (80.9%, 70%, and 53.6%, respectively) were significantly improved compared with low- (69%, 46.1%, and 30.7%, respectively) and medium-BED (67%, 28%, and 21%, respectively) treated patients. Results are also discussed in terms of BED calculated on alpha/beta 3 Gy characteristic of the microcapillary bed. No acute toxicity higher than Grade 1 was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Radioablation of pulmonary neoplastic nodules may be achieved with SRT delivered by using a high-dose fraction with high BED value.     

Tolerance to Accelerated Fractionation in the Head and Neck Region

To improve efficacy of radiotherapy in head and neck carcinomas, shortening the treatment time by accelerated fractionation is one possible method. However, there is a risk of enhancing side-effects. To study the tolerance to accelerated fractionation a study was thus performed where 2.0 Gy/fraction was given twice daily with 7-8 h interval between fractions. The total dose was 60 Gy and the overall treatment time 19-22 days. Thirteen patients with tumours in the head and neck region were consecutively included in the study. The treatment volumes ranged from encompassing the primary tumour with a margin to including the oral cavity and neck nodes bilaterally. Evaluation has been done by means of scoring the mucosal reactions, subjective estimation of pain, and functional impairment. Furthermore, the late radiation effects have been assessed by scoring of telangectasia, fibrosis of subcutaneous tissues and necrosis. The median follow-up time was 37 months. The treatment was generally well tolerated and could be completed without interruptions. However, in most cases the acute mucosal reactions appeared to be severe for a longer time than after standard fractionation. Restitution of normal mucosa without persistent complications has been achieved in all cases. The toxicity of this treatment schedule seems to be acceptable. No severe late complications have occurred during the follow-up period. A comparison with other treatment schedules has been made, using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model to calculate biologically effective dose (BED). In the present schedule it is shown that the early reacting normal tissue and tumour effects are predicted to be similar to the EORTC schedule whereas the late effects would be less pronounced. The CHART protocol gives less effects on early responding tissues due to the low total dose.     

Prospective clinical study of twice-a-day fractionation radiotherapy in head and neck cancer

Twenty-one patients of laryngeal cancer (T2, T3) were treated with Twice-A-Day fractionation radiotherapy (TADF) between April, 1986 and December, 1987. Tumor control and mucosal reaction were evaluated to compare with effects between TADF and Conventional fractionation radiotherapy (CF). Methods of TADF were 1.2-1.5 Gy per fraction, two fractions per day with a minimum interval of 6 Hr., 5 days a week and 66-72 Gy for total dose. In CF, they were 1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction, one fraction per day, 5 days a week and 60-70 Gy for total dose. Complete response dose were 57 Gy in average for TADF and 47 Gy for CF. There was no significant difference. Early mucosal reaction was observed slightly severe in TADF than in CF. But, there was no significant difference among them. Split time was neened 10 days in average for TADF and 7 days for CF. There was no elongation of overall time in TADF. Follow-up time was too short to discuss about late reaction. But there were no serious complications among the patients with 2 years follow-up. These data suggested that radiotherapy of TADF was effective and should be clinically studied furthermore.     

Accelerated hyperfractionation (AHF) compared to conventional fractionation (CF) in the postoperative radiotherapy of locally advanced head and neck cancer: influence of proliferation

Based on the assumption that an accelerated proliferation process prevails in tumour cell residues after surgery, the possibility that treatment acceleration would offer a therapeutic advantage in postoperative radiotherapy of locally advanced head and neck cancer was investigated. The value of T(pot) in predicting the treatment outcome and in selecting patients for accelerated fractionation was tested. Seventy patients with (T2/N1-N2) or (T3-4/any N) squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, larynx and hypopharynx who underwent radical surgery, were randomized to either (a) accelerated hyperfractionation: 46.2 Gy per 12 days, 1.4 Gy per fraction, three fractions per day with 6 h interfraction interval, treating 6 days per week or (b) Conventional fractionation: 60 Gy per 6 weeks, 2 Gy per fraction, treating 5 days per week. The 3-year locoregional control rate was significantly better in the accelerated hyperfractionation (88 +/- 4%) than in the CF (57+/- 9%) group, P=0.01 (and this was confirmed by multivariate analysis), but the difference in survival (60 +/- 10% vs 46 +/- 9%) was not significant (P=0.29). The favourable influence of a short treatment time was further substantiated by demonstrating the importance of the gap between surgery and radiotherapy and the overall treatment time between surgery and end of radiotherapy. Early mucositis progressed more rapidly and was more severe in the accelerated hyperfractionation group; reflecting a faster rate of dose accumulation. Xerostomia was experienced by all patients with a tendency to be more severe after accelerated hyperfractionation. Fibrosis and oedema also tended to be more frequent after accelerated hyperfractionation and probably represent consequential reactions. T(pot) showed a correlation with disease-free survival in a univariate analysis but did not prove to be an independent factor. Moreover, the use of the minimum and corrected P-values did not identify a significant cut-off. Compared to conventional fractionation, accelerated hyperfractionation did not seem to offer a survival advantage in fast tumours though a better local control rate was noted. This limits the use of T(pot) as a guide for selecting patients for accelerated hyperfractionation. For slowly growing tumours, tumour control and survival probabilities were not significantly different in the conventional fractionation and accelerated hyperfractionation groups. A rapid tumour growth was associated with a higher risk of distant metastases (P=0.01). In conclusion, tumour cell repopulation seems to be an important determinant of postoperative radiotherapy of locally advanced head and neck cancer despite lack of a definite association between T(pot) and treatment outcome. In fast growing tumours accelerated hyperfractionation provided an improved local control but without a survival advantage. To gain a full benefit from treatment acceleration, the surgery-radiotherapy gap and the overall treatment time should not exceed 6 and 10 weeks respectively.     

Combination external beam radiotherapy and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer: analysis of dose and fractionation schedule

PURPOSE: To determine an appropriate dose and fractionation schedule for a combination of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDR-ICBT) for uterine cervical cancer. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with EBRT and HDR-ICBT were analyzed. Twenty-five patients were classified as early disease (nonbulky Stage I/II, less than 4-cm diameter) and 63 patients as advanced disease (greater than 4 cm diameter or Stage IIIB) according to the American Brachytherapy Society definition. Tumor diameter was measured by MRI. Pelvic EBRT was delivered before applications of ICBT. HDR-ICBT was performed once a week, with a fraction point A dose of 6 Gy. Source loadings corresponded to the Manchester System for uterine cervical cancer. No planned optimization was done. A Henschke-type applicator was mostly used (86%). Median cumulative biologic effective dose (BED) at point A (EBRT + ICBT) was 64.8 Gy(10) (range: 48-76.8 Gy(10)) for early disease, and 76.8 Gy(10) (range: 38.4-86.4 Gy(10)) for advanced disease. Median cumulative BED at ICRU 38 reference points (EBRT + ICBT) was 97.7 Gy(3) (range: 59.1-134.4 Gy(3)) at the rectum, 97.8 Gy(3) (range: 54.6-130.4 Gy(3)) at the bladder, and 324 Gy(3) (range: 185.5-618 Gy(3)) at the vagina. Actuarial pelvic control rate and late complication rate were analyzed according to cumulative dose and calculated BED. RESULTS: The 3-year actuarial pelvic control rate was 82% for all 88 patients: 96% for those with early disease, and 76% for advanced disease. For pelvic control, no significant dose-response relationship was observed by treatment schedules and cumulative BED at point A for both early and advanced disease. The 3-year actuarial late complication rates (Grade > or =1) were 12% for proctitis, 11% for cystitis, and 14% for enterocolitis. There were significant differences on the incidence of proctitis (p < 0.0001) and enterocolitis (p < 0.0001), but not for cystitis by the treatment schedules and cumulative point A BED. All 4 patients treated with 86.4 Gy(10) at point A suffered both proctitis and enterocolitis. Patients with cumulative BED at rectal point of > or =100 Gy(3) had significantly higher incidence of proctitis (31% vs. 4%, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: In view of the therapeutic ratio, cumulative BED 70-80 Gy(10) at point A is appropriate for uterine cervical cancer patients treated with a combination of EBRT and HDR-ICBT. Present results and data from other literatures suggested that cumulative BED at the rectal point should be kept below 100-120 Gy(3) to prevent late rectal complication.     

Correction to Kasibhatla et al. How Much Radiation Is the Chemotherapy Worth in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer? (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;68:1491–1495)

PURPOSE: To correct several elementary radiobiologic errors in the otherwise admirable article by Kasibhatla, Kirkpatrick, and Brizel (2007) on estimating the equivalent radiation effect of the concomitant chemotherapy in head-and-neck chemoradiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: (1) Their equation was wrong because it omitted the lag or onset time of repopulation in tumors, Tk. Instead of zero days this should be 18-35 days. (2) Instead of a doubling time of 5 days, at most 3 days should be used for head-and-neck tumors. (3) Their slope "S" (the gamma-50 slope) for head-and-neck tumors should be 1.7, not 1.1. The same percentages of increased locoregional control as quoted by Kasibhatla et al. are used. RESULTS: The average time-corrected biologically effective dose for the 16 schedules listed should be 72.4 instead of 63.1 Gy(10). The average gains in locoregional tumor control are the equivalent of 8.8 Gy(10), not 10.6 Gy(10) (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The equivalent number of 2-Gy fractions of concomitant chemotherapy as used in the 16 listed schedules is 3.6 (95% confidence interval, 2.7-4.1), not 5 as claimed by Kasibhatla et al. The difference is statistically significant (p < 0.001).     

Isotope selection for permanent prostate implants? An evaluation of 103Pd versus 125I based on radiobiological effectiveness and dosimetry

Transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB) has become an increasingly popular treatment for early-stage/favorable-risk adenocarcinoma of prostate. Within TIPPB, permanent implants often use either (103)Pd (T(1/2) = 17 days) or (125)I (T(1/2) = 60 days). This review compares the radiobiological and treatment planning effectiveness of (103)Pd and (125)I implants by using the linear-quadratic model with recently published data regarding: prostate tumor cell doubling times, T(pot), alpha and alpha/beta, ratio. The tumor potential doubling times (T(pot)) were determined based on recently published proliferation constants (K(p)). The initial slope of the cell radiation dose survival curve, alpha, the terminal slope beta and the alpha/beta ratio were taken from recent published clinical and cellular results. The total dose delivered from each isotope was the dose used clinically, that is, 120 Gy for (103)Pd and 145 Gy for (125)I. Dale's modified linear-quadratic equation was used to estimate the biological effective dose, the cell-surviving fraction, the effective treatment time, and the wasted radiation dose for different values of T(pot). Treatment plans for peripherally loaded implants were compared. The T(pot) reported for organ-confined prostate carcinomas varied from 16 to 67 days. At short T(pot) both isotopes were less effective, but (103)Pd had much less dependence on T(pot) than (125)I. However, at long T(pot) both isotopes produced similar effects. The minimum surviving fraction for exposure to (103)Pd decreased from 1.40 x 10(-4) to 1.31 x 10(-5) as the T(pot) increased from 16 to 67 days. By contrast for exposure to (125)I, the minimum surviving fraction decreased from 3.98 x 10(-3) to 1.98 x 10(-5) over the same range of T(pot). A comparison of treatment plans revealed that (103)Pd plans required more needles and seeds; however, this was a function of seed strength. Both isotopes had similar dose-volume histograms for prostate, urethra, and rectum. The theoretical prediction of effectiveness using the linear quadratic equation for the common clinically prescribed total radiation doses indicated that (103)Pd should be more effective than (125)I because it had less dependence on T(pot). The greatest benefit of (103)Pd was shown to be with tumors with a short T(pot). Although the regrowth delay would be longer with (125)I, the benefit was inconsequential compared with the very slow doubling times of localized prostate cancer. Treatment planning with either isotope revealed no significant differences. These findings may explain why clinically there seemed to be no clear difference in treatment outcome with either isotope. Based on these predictions, we recommend a clinical trial to compare the efficacy of the two isotopes.