Anorectal melanoma—An incurable disease?

PURPOSE: This study was designed to describe recurrence and survival rates after operative treatment for anorectal melanoma and to identify predictive factors for recurrence. METHODS: Records of 50 patients with anorectal melanoma from 1939 to 1993 were reviewed. RESULTS: Overall five-year survival and disease-free survival were 22 and 16 percent, respectively. At the time of diagnosis, 26 percent of patients had metastatic disease, and all died within 12 (mean, 6.3) months. Five-year survival and recurrence rates were identical after either abdominoperineal resection (APR) or wide local excision, both with curative intent. Gender, size of tumor, presence of melanin, positive perirectal lymph nodes, or treatment were not predictive of recurrence. Anorectal melanoma was found incidentally after hemorrhoidectomy or polypectomy in five patients. Three other patients underwent an excisional biopsy of a lesion measuring less than 2 cm. Of these eight patients, five underwent APR and three underwent wide local excision with no microscopic residual tumor at pathology. All developed regional or systemic recurrence at a mean of 21 (range, 4–88) months, and all died of their disease at a mean of 29 (range, 5–98) months. CONCLUSION: Prognosis for anorectal melanoma is poor, irrespective of surgical treatment performed. No predictive factors for recurrence were identified in this series. Wide local excision with a negative margin of a least 1 cm is suggested as the treatment of choice. APR should be reserved for tumor not amenable to local excision or for palliative treatment of large obstructive lesion until effective adjuvant therapies are available. Read at meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.     

Dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection for rectal tumour

Aim To review the results of dynamic graciloplasty for total anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer.Patients and methods Chart reviews were done on 17 patients who had dynamic graciloplasty following abdominoperineal resection and details of post-operative complications, bowel functions and recurrences were obtained.Results Seventeen patients (12 males) had dynamic graciloplasty after APR for low rectal tumours. The median age was 58.5 years (range 33–78). Three patients from overseas were lost to follow-up, and three still have not had the defunctioning stoma closed. Only 11 patients were available for evaluation of function. The median time from graciloplasty to continence to solids and liquids is 15.7 months (range 0.4–21.9 months). Six patients had defecatory problems, requiring daily irrigation to evacuate. Nine patients were continent without need for gracilis stimulation. Only two patients needed gracilis stimulation to maintain continence. Fifty percent of rectal carcinoma patients had developed a recurrence.Conclusion Dynamic graciloplasty had a high morbidity and did not always bring about normal defecatory function. Gracilis stimulation was not needed to achieve continence in all cases. Conversely, dynamic graciloplasty may lead to defecatory difficulties in a large number of patients. Graciloplasty should only be considered three years after the initial APR to avoid performing the procedure in a patient who may develop recurrence as well as to select patients who are psychologically prepared for the surgery and its complications.     

Abdominoperineal resection and perineal colostomy for low rectal cancer

PURPOSE: We sought to evaluate a new technique for creation of a continent perineal colostomy following abdominoperineal resection (APR) of the rectum for low rectal cancer. METHODS: Nine selected patients with low rectal cancer (two males; median age, 55.6 years; classified as Dukes A, 6 patients and as Dukes B, 3 patients) underwent APR. Following this, the original Lazaro da Silva technique was used as follows: 1) for performance of three circular myotomies in the distal sigmoid with a distance between each couple of no more than 8 cm; 2) repair of the myotomies, thus creating three circular colonic valves, the most distal of which remained extraperitoneally; 3) for construction of a perineal colostomy lying flush with the perineal skin; 4) after the patient starts consuming a regular diet, enemas through the perineal stoma are done, usually twice per week, to achieve defecation. Functional outcome was assessed by evaluation of bowel movements and neoanal continence. RESULTS: There were no deaths. From January 1994 until October 1995, no tumor recurrence has occurred, and fecal continence has been good. Four of the patients were able to defecate without enemas (2–4 times per week), and in five patients the self-administration of enemas (2–4 times a week) were necessary to accomplish defecation. CONCLUSION: Initial results with the Lazaro da Silva technique have been encouraging.     

Paradoxical puborectalis contraction in patients after pelvic pouch construction

Normal defecation is associated with relaxation of sphincters during the evacuation process. However, obstructive defecation is sometimes seen clinically manifested by abnormal contraction of the puborectalis during defecation rather than relaxing. This condition has not previously been described after pelvic pouch construction. PURPOSE: This study was done to evaluate patients for defecation difficulties caused by paradoxical puborectalis contraction after pelvic pouch procedures. METHODS: Prospectively, patients with defecation difficulties were questioned. They then underwent electromyography if they met particular criteria. Biofeedback was offered to all patients demonstrating paradox on electromyography. Follow-up was by clinic visits and interviews. RESULTS: After pelvic pouch construction, 13 patients were found to have paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Twelve of 13 patients elected to have biofeedback therapy. Eleven of these 12 were available for follow-up an average of eight (1–15) months after biofeedback. Nine improved, and two had no change in their defecation difficulty. Of the initial 13, 10 had an event, either pouchitis or abdominal trauma, directly before their defecation problems. CONCLUSION: Paradoxical puborectalis contraction can occur in patients after pelvic pouch surgery. It should be suspected in patients with defecation difficulties in the absence of an anatomic abnormality. Biofeedback is effective treatment.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Orlando, Florida, May 8 to 13, 1994.     

Functional comparison between double and triple ileal loop pouches

Ileal pouch function in 35 patients operated upon by the same surgeon were compared. Seventeen of the patients had a double loop (J) ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and 18 a triple loop (S) pouch. The patients were examined a mean of 27.9 months and 5.1 months, respectively, after ileostomy closure. Ten of the S-pouch patients were evaluated more than 6 months (S>6 months), mean 9.1 after ileostomy closure. There were no differences in the mean maximum resting pressures or maximum squeeze pressures between the groups. The incidence of daytime and nocturnal leakage was lower in the S-pouch group, 22 and 29 percent, than in the J group 29, and 53 percent. Though the mean maximum tolerated volume (MTV) of the S-pouch group was greater than the J group, the difference was not statistically significant. The difference in the mean compliance between the J- and S-pouch groups and the J and S>6 months group was statistically significant (P<0.01) and (P<0.008). All the patients could evacuate spontaneously. The difference in the 24-hour frequency of defecation between the S>6 months and J group was significant (P<0.05), but not between the S and J groups. The median frequency of nocturnal defecation between the S>6 months and J pouch groups was significant (P<0.005), but not between the S and J groups. The triple loop S-pouches were more compliant than the J-pouches and had a better functional result as shown by a lower incidence of nocturnal leakage, and a lower frequency of defecation during the day and night.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Toronto, Canada, June 11 to 16, 1989.     

New technique for pouch-anal reconstruction after total mesorectal excision

PURPOSE: Surgical options in metachronous or recurrent rectal cancer after anterior or low anterior resection are limited and frequently result in abdominoperineal rectal extirpation sacrificing the sphincter or in straight coloanal reconstruction. Decreased capacity and distensibility in straight coloanal reconstruction after proctectomy correlate well with increased daily stool frequency, urgency, and incontinence. A new technique for coloanal pouch reconstruction using the ileocecal segment is proposed. METHODS: A pedunculated ileocecal segment was rotated 180° counterclockwise and placed between the sigmoid colon and anal canal. Ileal end of the pouch was then anastomosed end-to-end with the transected sigmoid colon and proximal end of the ileum with distal end of the ascending colon. Functional results and defecation quality of a 67-year-old woman are described 6 and 12 months after ileocolonic interposition pouch replacing the tumorbearing rectum. RESULTS: Twelve months postoperatively, the patient is free of disease with an excellent defecation quality, has full anal continence without soiling, is having two solid stools in 24 hours. Functional control revealed normal anal sphincter pressure and large rectal capacity and compliance. Neither outlet obstruction nor incomplete evacuation have been observed. CONCLUSION: The ileocecal interposition pouch (cecum pouch) represents an alternative technique for coloanal reconstruction in low rectal cancer, recurrent rectal cancer, or metachronous low rectal cancer with intact sphincter function. This new method presents some attractive features compared with techniques presently in use.     

Videoproctographic assessment after restorative proctocolectomy

Videoproctography was performed in 40 patients after restorative proctocolectomy to evaluate pouch emptying, anopouch angle, and pelvic floor movement in relationship to functional outcome. Results were compared between the two different pouch designs tested and a control group of 26 patients who had an intact rectum. There was no difference in emptying between the two pouch designs or compared with the control subjects. Emptying did not influence either the frequency of defecation or patient soiling rate. The presence of an anal stricture was associated with poor emptying in each case in the pouch group. Anorectal angle was no different between the different pouch designs or compared with the control group at rest, during pelvic floor contraction, or attempted defecation. A similar finding was obtained with anorectal angle position and movement during pelvic floor contraction and attempted defecation in both pouch design groups and when compared with normal rectum. This study shows that the only factor that is consistently associated with poor pouch emptying is the presence of an anal stricture.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Toronto, Canada, June 11 to 16, 1989.     

What happens to a pelvic pouch when a fistula develops?

PURPOSE: The aim of this article is to determine the outcome of the pelvic pouch after the occurrence of a fistula. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1983 to 1995, 1,040 pelvic pouch surgeries were done at our institution. We reviewed the records of all patients with pouch-related fistulas. Data were collected from chart reviews and our pouch registry. RESULTS: Among 59 patients (22 males) with fistulas, mean age was 33 (range, 19–57) years. Preoperative diagnosis was mucosal ulcerative colitis (n=52), indeterminate colitis (n=6), and familial polyposis (n=1). Site of fistulas included pouch/vaginal (n=24), pouch/cutaneous (n=11), pouch/perineal (n=16), and pouch/presacral (n=8). Postoperative diagnosis was mucosal ulcerative colitis (n=40), Crohn's disease (n=14), indeterminate colitis (n=4), and familial polyposis (n=1). One hundred eleven (range, 1–7) surgeries for treatment were performed. At a mean follow-up of 26 (range, 1–121) months, 19 pouches (32 percent) had been excised, 34 patients had functioning pouches and no fistula, 5 patients had a closed fistula but refused ileostomy closure, and 1 patient had died of unrelated causes (but the fistula was closed). Pouch type and preoperative diagnosis did not statistically affect pouch failure rates (P=0.43 and 0.10. respectively). CONCLUSION: Successful treatment of fistula from a pelvic pouch can be achieved in more than 60 percent of patients. However, multiple procedures may be needed for a successful outcome. Ultimately, 32 percent had their pouches excised.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.     

Laparoscopic total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to describe our results in a series of patients undergoing total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TAC/IRA) using laparoscopic techniques in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and rectal-sparing. Young patients with FAP requiring TAC/IRA may be ideal candidates for minimally invasive surgery, because they are generally thin and have benign disease. They might benefit maximally from the theoretic advantages of these techniques. METHODS: We have performed laparoscopic TAC/IRA in 16 FAP patients (10 females; mean age, 18 years). Procedures were entirely intracorporeal, with a 3-cm to 6-cm specimen extraction incision. RESULTS: Median operative time was 232 (range, 156–285) minutes, and blood loss 175 (range, 50–675) ml. The only intraoperative complication, a twisted ileorectal anastomosis, was noted intraoperatively and revised. There were no conversions to conventional laparotomy. Median postoperative interval to passage of flatus was three days,^1–4 and for bowel movements it was three days.^1–4 Median hospital stay was five days.^3–11 One case of early postoperative small-bowel obstruction was treated nonoperatively, and one case of brachial plexus neuropraxia resolved spontaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this preliminary experience, we believe laparoscopic TAC/ IRA can be a safe and effective treatment for selected patients with FAP. As techniques and instrumentation for laparoscopic colon surgery are perfected, this procedure will likely become an appealing option in the management of patients with FAP. Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996. No reprints are available     

Alteration in intestinal permeability after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PPURPOSE: The physiologic changes that occur when the small bowel is used as a reservoir, as in the ileal pouchanal anastomosis, are poorly understood. Alterations in bowel permeability, which may lead to bacterial translocation that could result in illness or dysfunction of the pouch, may be one such consequence of the pouch procedure. METHODS: Whole-bowel permeability was evaluated in patients with and without the pouch through the use of an orally consumed nonmetabolizable sugar clearance technique. Patients in whom the ileal pouchanal anastomosis was performed for ulcerative colitis (17 patients) and patients with familial polyposis (7 patients) were compared with normal healthy volunteers (10 patients) and patients with ulcerative colitis with and without curative colectomy and ileostomy (6 and 5 patients, respectively). RESULTS: Measured by this technique, no differences were noted in bowel permeability between the volunteers and patients with ulcerative colitis, even after colectomy and ileostomy (1.7±0.4 in normal healthy volunteers, 1.8±0.5 in patients with ulcerative colitis without stoma, and 1.4±0.2 in patients with ulcerative colitis with ileostomy). The group of patients with an ileal reservoir, however, had a significantly increased index of measured bowel permeability (3.5±0.5 in patients with ulcerative colitis and 5.1±0.7 in patients with familial polyposis; P<0.05 by analysis of variance compared with normal healthy volunteers and patients with ulcerative colitis with or without ileostomy). CONCLUSION: The exact site, cause, and consequence of this possible alteration of bowel permeability are unclear but appear to be related to the presence of the pouch and are not caused by the underlying pathologic diagnosis.Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Boston, Massachusetts, May 12 to 17, 1991. Winner of the New Jersey Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Award, 1991.     

Comparison of handsewn with stapled loop ileostomy closures

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine if a stapled side-to-side closure of an ileostomy results in decreased length of hospital stay compared with a handsewn closure. METHODS: From March 1993 to August 1994, patients who had previously undergone total proctocolectomy with pelvic pouch formation and loop ileostomy were studied. At the time of ileostomy closure, patients were randomized to have their stoma closed by a handsewn technique or stapled closure. Data were prospectively gathered. RESULTS: During 17 months, 61 consecutive patients (38 male, 23 female) with a mean age of 37.8 (range, 16–69) years had their ileostomy closed and were entered into this study. There were 31 patients in the stapled group and 30 in the handsewn group. Mean operative time was 55 (range, 32–97) minutes in the stapled group and 67 (range, 42–128) minutes in the handsewn group (P=0.01 Wilcoxon's test). Average length of stay was three (range, 2–5) days in the stapled group and 2.5 (range, 1–19) days in the handsewn group. One patient from the stapled group and two patients from the handsewn group were readmitted because of small-bowel obstruction. One patient from the stapled group underwent additional surgery for a leaking enterotomy with no defect in staple closure. Two patients from the handsewn group underwent additional surgery for small-bowel obstruction. There was no significant difference in day of first stool or day of solid diet for the two groups. CONCLUSION: Handsewn and stapled closures of loop ileostomy are not significantly different with respect to day of first stool, day until solid diet, or discharge day. Complications were similar in the two groups. Stapled closure is significantly quicker than handsewn closure.Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 7 to 12, 1995.No reprints are available.     

Long-term results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with Crohn's disease

PURPOSE: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical treatment of choice for most patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Crohn's disease is, however, a contraindication. Because distinction between UC and Crohn's disease can be difficult, some patients with Crohn's disease inadvertently undergo IPAA. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcome of patients with Crohn's disease who have undergone IPAA. METHODS: A total of 37 patients (20 men) were studied. Each had undergone mucosectomy with handsewn IPAA (J-pouch, n=35; S-pouch, n=1; W-pouch, n=1). Histologic examination of the resected specimen at time of IPAA showed features of ulcerative colitis (n=22), indeterminate colitis (n=9), or Crohn's disease (n=6). The stoma was closed in all patients. RESULTS: A total of 11 of 37 patients developed complex fistulas (pouch-cutaneous (n=6), pouch-vaginal (n=4), or pouch-vesical (n=1). Crohn's disease has recurred in the pouch (n=20), anal canal (n=4), pouch and anal canal (n=10), and elsewhere (n=3). After ten years (range, 3–14), the pouch remains in situ in 20 patients in whom frequency of bowel movement is seven times (3–10)/24 hours,in situ but defunctioned in seven patients, and excised in ten patients (failure rate, 45 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Inadvertent IPAA for Crohn's disease is associated with a high rate of failure (45 percent) but an acceptable long-term functional result if the pouch can be kept in situ.Read at the meeting of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Glasgow, United Kingdom, May 22 to 24, 1996.     

Total anorectal reconstruction by double graciloplasty: experience with delayed, selective use of implantable pulse generators

This study reports our experience with total anorectal reconstruction (TAR), supported at a later phase, whenever necessary, by an implantable pulse generator. Thirteen patients underwent total anorectal reconstruction by double graciloplasty, diverting loop colostomy, and implantation of temporary electrodes. External-source, short-term, intermittent electrostimulation and biofeedback were used for neosphincter voluntary control training. After abdominal stoma closure, 6 months after initial surgery in disease-free patients, functional results were evaluated by a scoring system and anomanometry. A pulse generator was implanted whenever continence was judged unsatisfactory. After continuous electrostimulation training, neosphincter function was reassessed. Major graciloplasty complications (partial muscle necrosis and perineal colostomy necrosis) were treated successfully by surgery. One death of myocardial infarction occurred after discharge. Three patients refused further surgery. One patient did not undergo abdominal stoma closure because of early hepatic metastases. Functional evaluation after closure (eight patients) showed the following results: two ”excellent” (no pulse generator implanted), three ”good” (two stimulator implantations, with an ”excellent” result), two ”fair”, and one ”poor” (3 implantations, with a ”good” result). In addition to improving clinical results (P=0.042), resting anal pressures were also increased significantly by active an implantable pulse generator (P=0.043). Although stimulators, whenever implanted, improved the neosphincter function, delayed, selective use of these in some cases rendered an implantable pulse generator either unnecessary from a functional viewpoint or redundant because of cancer recurrence or infectious complications. Drawbacks to the procedure were poor patient complicance to neosphincter training and to multiple surgical procedures, and excessive wasting of human resources during training for intermittent electrostimulation and biofeedback. Accepted: 16 April 1999     

Surgery after colectomy for ulcerative colitis

The need for surgery after colectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis in Stockholm County over a 30-year period, 1955 to 1984, was investigated. During this time 483 patients were discharged from the hospital after colectomy. The mean period of observation from colectomy was 11.6 years. In 325 (67 percent) of the 483 patients there was need for further surgery (932 surgical procedures) during the period of observation. In 95 (20 percent) patients 115 small intestinal obstructions requiring surgery developed. The 2-year and 15-year cumulative probabilities of a first small intestinal obstruction were 11 percent (confidence intervals [CI] 8–14 percent) and 23 percent (CI 19–27 percent), respectively. In 42 (16 percent) of 255 patients treated by proctocolectomy and ileostomy there was need for 64 ileostomy revisions. The 2-year and 15-year cumulative probabilities of a first ileostomy revision were 9 percent (CI 6–12 percent) and 19 percent (CI 14–24 percent), respectively. Ninety-one Kock's pouches were constructed and a total of 125 revisions of Kock's pouch were performed. The 2-year and 15-year cumulative probabilities of a first Kock's pouch revision were 52 percent (CI 41–63 percent) and 57 percent (CI 46–68 percent), respectively. In 75 patients a pelvic pouch and ileoanal anastomosis was constructed. In 32 patients 73 surgical procedures due to pouch-related dysfunction were performed. Alterations in ileoanal pouch technique and increasing surgical experience has resulted in a markedly decreasing frequency of complications during the last years. There was no need for further surgery in 116 (45 percent) of the 255 patients treated by proctocolectomy and ileostomy, in 31 (34 percent) of the 91 patients with Kock's pouch, in 20 (39 percent) of the 51 patients with ileorectal anastomosis, and in 43 (57 percent) of the 75 patients with pelvic pouch and ileoanal anastomosis (closure of loop ileostomy excluded).Supported by grants from the Swedish Society of Medicine. Address reprint requests to Dr. Leijonmarck: Department of Surgery, St. Göran's Hospital, S-112 81 Stockholm, Sweden.     

State of the defunctionalized sphincter in patients undergoing ileoanal pouch anastomosis

PURPOSE: Our aim was to determine manometric status and functional outcome of the ileoanal pouch procedure in a subset of patients with defunctionalized anal sphincters as a result of long-term fecal diversion. METHODS: The anal manometric profiles of 12 patients defunctionalized for one year or more were compared with 26 patients with nondefunctionalized anal sphincters. Functional data were obtained from the Lahey Clinic Ileoanal Pouch Registry. RESULTS: Preoperative manometric data revealed a mean resting pressure of 91.5 mmHg in the nondefunctionalized group vs.68.7 mmHg in the defunctionalized group; mean squeezing pressure was 171.7 mmHg (nondefunctionalized group) vs.102.3 mmHg (defunctionalized group); and squeezing pressure volume was 1,283,000 mmHg ³ (nondefunctionalized group)vs.585,000 mmHg ³ (defunctionalized group). Functionally both groups had a mean of 6.1 bowel movements in a 24-hour period and could defer defecation for a mean of 2 hours. Leakage occurred in 22 percent of the defunctionalized group and 17 percent of the nondefunctionalized group (P=0.35). CONCLUSION: Despite physiologic perturbations, the long-term, defunctionalized anal sphincter can adequately support a restorative procedure without regard to timing of pouch creation.Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, May 2 to 7, 1993.     

Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with a pelvic ileal reservoir compares favorably with that of patients with medically treated colitis

There remains some reluctance among physicians to refer patients for restorative proctocolectomy (RP). They argue that their patients would be worse off with a pouch because of the attendant problems of urgency and frequent bowel actions. The aim of this study was to compare quality of life in patients who had undergone RP with that of patients with ulcerative colitis on long-term medical treatment. A detailed questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) test were completed by 103 patients who had undergone RP and by 95 patients with ulcerative colitis on medical treatment and in remission attending a gastroenterology clinic. Patients with a pouch had a greater frequency of bowel action [five times per 24 hours (range, 4–7) vs.two times per 24 hours (range, 1–3);P <0.001] but less urgency of defecation [12/103 (11.7 percent) vs.69/95 (72.6 percent);P <0.001] than patients with medically treated colitis. Efficiency of evacuation, discrimination between flatus and feces, use of perianal pads, and perianal soreness were similar. Use of antidiarrheal medication was more common in the pouch group [53 of 103 patients (51.5 percent) vs.3 of 95 patients (3.2 percent);P < 0.05], whereas use of topical steroids was more common in medically treated patients [40 of 95 patients (47.1 percent) vs.9 of 103 patients (8.7 percent);P <0.05]. Limitation of social activity and HAD scores were significantly higher in medically treated patients. Quality of life for patients with a pouch appears to be as good as that for patients with medically treated colitis.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Francisco, California, June 7 to 12, 1992.     

Fertility and sexual and gynecologic function after heal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the incidence of infertility, gynecologic problems, and sexual dysfunction after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 206 females who underwent pouch surgery at a single institution from 1980 through 1991. Response rate was 53 percent (110/206). The computerized registry of the 206 females undergoing IPAA at this institution was reviewed to add additional data. RESULTS: Mean age at pouch construction was 32 (range, 14–61) years. Mean time from pouch surgery to survey was 49 (range, 1–132) months. Fifty-seven females had 119 children before pouch surgery, and 23 children were born to 19 females after IPAA (5 vaginal deliveries, 18 Cesarean sections). Eighteen females experienced infertility after IPAA. Thirty patients had persistent dyspareunia. Pelvic cysts developed in 15 patients; 11 patients required surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Although childbirth appears safe, gynecologic problems, such as dyspareunia and formation of pelvic cysts, may be underestimated after IPAA. The effects of IPAA on fertility are still unknown.Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, May 2 to 7, 1993.     

Does preoperative stoma marking and education by the enterostomal therapist affect outcome?

INTRODUCTION: It is generally accepted that preoperative patient education and skin marking for a stoma location are important in avoiding stoma complications. At our institution, enterostomal therapists are available to educate and mark patients before their surgery. However, for various reasons, not all patients who had an elective stoma created, had preoperative skin marking or instructions on stoma care. Our registry of patients provided us with a means of comparing patients who have undergone an elective stoma with (Group I) and without (Group II) preoperative marking and education. METHODS: Our stoma registry consisting of 1,790 patients was retrospectively reviewed from 1978 to 1996 to assess all patients who underwent elective stoma construction. Patients included for review had a total of 593 elective stomas. All patients with stomas are followed by the enterostomal therapists postoperatively and, therefore, were evaluated for both early and late complications. Early complications were defined as any adverse event occurring within 30 days of surgery and late complications as those occurring 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: Our enterostomal therapists preoperatively evaluated 292 of the 593 patients planned for possible stoma creation. This included careful marking of the stoma site by having the patients lie down, sit, and stand and locating a stable flat area on the abdomen, taking into account the belt line and any abnormal skin creases or deformities. Patients were instructed on stoma appearance with a model and given basic stoma care instructions. In Group I, there were 95 (32.5 percent) complications (68 (23.3 percent) occurred early and 27 (9.25 percent) occurred late). There were 301 patients who did not receive preoperative evaluation (Group II). In this second group, 131 (43.5 percent) complications were found, (95 (31.6 percent) occurred early and 36 (12 percent) occurred late). The difference in total number of complications between groups was determined to be statistically significant, with a P value of <0.0075, as was the difference in early complications, with a P value of <0.03. The difference in late complications is not significant, with a P value of <0.34. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that preoperative evaluation by an enterostomal therapist, marking of the skin site, and providing patient education reduce adverse outcomes. All elective procedures that may result in stoma formation should, therefore, be assessed and marked preoperatively. Patients, likewise, should be informed and taught to care for their forthcoming stomas preoperatively and postoperatively.All data reported in this article was obtained through the stoma registry at Cook County Hospital.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.     

Secondary coloperineal pull-through and double dynamic graciloplasty after miles resection—feasible, but with a high morbidity

PURPOSE: Until recently, patients who underwent abdominoperineal resections had to cope with a colostomy for the rest of their lives. For some of these patients this colostomy was a terrible burden, physically and mentally. Publications about abdominoperineal pull-through and double dynamic graciloplasty immediately after a Miles resection showed good results. The purpose of this study was to investigate the procedure as a secondary approach after abdominoperineal resections. METHODS: In this study seven patients were evaluated. All had had an abdominoperineal resection and proved to have unbearable problems with their stoma. All had a secondary pull-through and double dynamic graciloplasty, a mean of 8.5 (range, 1.1–34.8) years after the Miles resection. RESULTS: In five patients continence was regained; two were reversed to colostomy because of several complications. Patients who had a successful outcome also suffered from numerous complications, with a total mean hospital stay of 73.8 (range, 27–167) days, a mean of 3.1 (range, 1–6) additional operations, and 1.8 (range, 0–4) readmissions. CONCLUSION: Secondary anorectal reconstruction after abdominoperineal resection is a feasible option, but with a high morbidity. Because of this the procedure was stopped at the beginning of 1997.This study was funded by a grant from the National Fund for Investigational Medicine (Ministry of Health), the Netherlands.Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Antonio, Texas, May 2 to 7, 1998.     

Adults born with high anorectal atresia—How do they manage?

PURPOSE: We are interested in the way patients, who underwent surgery for high anorectal atresia, control their defecation. Considering that some patients, despite newer operative techniques, always will suffer from minor or major soiling we attempted to find some guidelines for postoperative support for future patients. METHOD: Fifty-eight patients (median age, 26 (range, 18.1–56.9) years) were personally interviewed. RESULTS: Regulating defecation is done in five different modes: 16 patients have stools after urge, 15 control their stools mainly by going to the toilet at regular times, 18 perform bowel-irrigations or use enemas, 2 have loss of feces continuously, and 7 patients have an ileostomy or colostomy. More than one-half of patients influence their defecation by diet. Of the patients with anal defecation, 6 never soil, 39 sometimes soil small amounts, and 6 often soil seriously. Eighteen patients occasionally suffer from constipation. There is no mode of defecation regulation outstanding in preventing soiling or constipation. However, patients who do not regulate defecation somehow suffer from serious soiling. Most patients are content with their level of cleanliness. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of the mode of defecation regulation, many patients soil sometimes small amounts and a few often soil seriously. In view of the fact that most patients had to find the current control of defecation regulation by themselves rather late and lacked professional support, it is questionable whether the chosen mode of defecation regulation is the most optimal mode for each patient. We assume that a stepwise protocol under professional support, starting by the most natural mode of defecation, will improve defecation regulation in a more efficient way (earlier and better).Supported by the Foundation of Pediatric Surgical Research of the University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.