Carrot allergy: double-blinded, placebo-controlled food challenge and identification of allergens

BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to carrot affect up to 25% of food-allergic subjects. Clinical manifestations of carrot allergy and IgE responses to carrot proteins, however, have never been studied in subjects with carrot allergy confirmed by means of double-blinded, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this investigation were to confirm clinically relevant sensitizations to carrot by means of DBPCFC, to validate current diagnostic methods, and to identify IgE-reactive carrot proteins in patients with true allergy. METHODS: DBPCFCs were performed in 26 subjects with histories of allergic reactions to carrot. Patients underwent skin prick tests with carrot extract, fresh carrot, and various pollen extracts. Specific IgE to carrot, celery, birch, and mugwort pollen and to rBet v 1, rBet v 2, and rBet v 6 were measured through use of the CAP method. Carrot allergens were identified by means of immunoblotting and blotting inhibition. RESULTS: Twenty of 26 patients had positive DBPCFC results. The sensitivity of the determination of carrot-specific IgE antibodies through use of the CAP method (> or =0.7 kU/L) was 90%, the sensitivity for skin prick testing with commercial extracts was 26%, and the sensitivity for prick-to-prick tests with raw carrot was 100%. The Bet v 1--related major carrot allergen Dau c 1 was recognized by IgE from 85% of patients; 45% were sensitized to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants and 20% to carrot profilin. In 1 subject, a Bet v 6--related carrot allergen was recognized. In 4 patients, IgE binding to Dau c 1 was not inhibited or was weakly inhibited by rBet v 1 or birch pollen extract. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the allergenicity of carrot by means of DBPCFC. DBPCFC-positive patients had exclusively specific IgE antibodies to birch pollen--related carrot allergens, Dau c 1 being the major allergen. The lack of inhibition of IgE binding to Dau c 1 by birch allergens in a subgroup of patients might indicate an secondary immune response to new epitopes on the food allergen that are not cross-reactive with Bet v 1.     

Antibody profiles and self-reported symptoms to pollen-related food allergens in grass pollen-allergic patients from northern Europe

BACKGROUND: Most studies on pollen-related food allergy have so far focused on the association of birch/weed pollen allergens and plant food allergy. The aim of this study was to elucidate the allergen spectrum among a group of grass pollen-allergic patients from northern Europe and to relate the results to clinical histories of pollen-related food allergy. METHODS: Fifty-eight grass pollen-allergic patients answered a questionnaire regarding allergy to foods. Blood samples were taken to test IgE-reactivity to a large panel of pollen allergens and pollen- and nonpollen-related food allergens using crude allergen extracts and recombinant and native allergens. RESULTS: Three different groups of grass pollen-allergic patients were identified according to their IgE antibody profile: a grass pollen group only (19%), a grass and tree pollen group (29%) and a grass, tree and compositae (pan-) pollen group (48%). No sensitization to Bet v 1 as well as almost no IgE to plant food was observed in the grass pollen group. In contrast, nearly all patients in the two tree-related groups had IgE to Bet v 1, which reflected the high frequency of adverse reactions to typical birch-related food in these groups. Only four patients belonging to the pan-pollen group displayed IgE to profilin Phl p 12/Bet v 2. Patients in the pan-pollen group reported significantly more symptoms to food allergens compared with patients in the two other groups. The most frequently reported symptom was the oral allergy syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitization to grass pollen alone is rare among grass pollen-allergic patients from northern Europe. The majority of patients are in addition sensitized to birch (Bet v 1), which seems to be closely related to their pollen-derived food allergy. The study highlights the advantage of using well-defined allergen molecules for the diagnosis of cross-reactivity between pollen and food allergens.     

Soybean allergy in patients allergic to birch pollen: clinical investigation and molecular characterization of allergens

BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to legumes are generally thought to be acquired by means of primary sensitization through the gastrointestinal tract. Recently, Gly m 4 (starvation-associated message 22), a Bet v 1-related pathogenesis-related protein 10 from soy, was suggested to be an allergen in patients with allergic reactions to a dietary product containing a soy protein isolate. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the clinical relevance of Gly m 4 in subjects allergic to birch pollen with soy allergy and to assess the risk for subjects allergic to birch pollen to acquire soy allergy. METHODS: Twenty-two patients allergic to birch pollen with soy allergy confirmed by means of positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge results (n = 16) or a convincing history (n = 6) were investigated for IgE reactivity to birch pollen and soy allergens by using the Pharmacia CAP system and immunoblot analysis. Cross-reactivity was assessed by means of enzyme allergosorbent test inhibition. Ninety-four patients with birch pollen allergy were interviewed to assess soy tolerance and screened for IgE reactivity to Gly m 4 by means of immunoblotting. The Gly m 4 content in soy foods and soybean varieties was investigated by means of quantitative evaluation of immunoblots. RESULTS: During double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge, 10 patients experienced symptoms localized to the oral cavity, and 6 patients had a more severe reaction. CAP analysis revealed Gly m 4-specific IgE in 96% (21/22) of the patients. All patients had Bet v 1-specific IgE antibodies, and 23% (5/22) had positive Bet v 2 results. In IgE immunoblotting 25% (6/22) of the patients recognized soy profilin (Gly m 3), and 64% (14/22) recognized other soy proteins. IgE binding to soy was at least 80% inhibited by birch pollen and 60% inhibited by rGly m 4 in 9 of 11 sera tested. Seventy-one percent (67/94) of highly Bet v 1-sensitized patients with birch pollen allergy were sensitized to Gly m 4, and 9 (9.6%) of those patients reported soy allergy. The Gly m 4 content in soy products ranged between 0 and 70 ppm (milligrams per kilogram). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that soybean is another birch pollen-related allergenic food. Gly m 4 is the major soy allergen for patients allergic to birch pollen with soy allergy. The content of Gly m 4 in soy food products strongly depends on the degree of food processing.     

Possible relationship between systemic side effects and sensitization to rPar j 2 in allergic patients submitted to an ultra-rush (20 min) sublingual immunotherapy and selected by component resolved diagnosis

BACKGROUND: The pollen of Parietaria spp., a weed of the Urticaceae family, is a major cause of respiratory allergy in the Mediterranean area, where the most common species are Parietaria judaica and Parietaria officinalis. In this study, we evaluated the specific serum IgE-binding profiles to individual P. judaica pollen recombinant major allergen, and Phleum pratense cytoskeletal profilin and a 2-EF-hand calcium-binding allergen homologous to cross-reactive Parietaria pollen allergens, in patients allergic to pollen with positive skin test towards Parietaria spp. extract. METHODS: The present observation included 220 patients from the province of Cuneo, north-west Italy, all suffering from rhino-conjunctivitis and/or asthma selected on the basis of skin test positive to P. judaica extract. The sera were evaluated for specific IgE reactivity to P. judaica pollen major recombinant(r) allergen Par j 2, Phleum pratense pollen allergens rPhl p 7 (2-EF-hand calcium binding protein) and rPhl p 12 (profilin), both identified as cross-reactive Parietaria spp. allergens, using Pharmacia CAP System. Out of 220 patients, 37 patients with IgE reactivity to rPar j 2 and 105 patients sensitized to at least one timothy pollen major allergen (i. e. rPhl p 1, rPhl p 2, natural Phl p 4 and rPhl p 6) were submitted to an ultra-rush protocol of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). The occurrence of adverse reactions were evaluated in both groups. RESULTS: All 220 patients with pollinosis and positive in vivo skin prick tests had in vitro positive CAP results to P. judaica natural extract. On the contrary, in these patients the prevalence of Par j 2-specific IgE was only 33.2% (73/220). In fact, 116/220 (52.7%) patients with serum specific IgE to crude Parietaria pollen extract had specific IgE to Phl p 12, 18/220 (8.1%) subjects with specific IgE to rPhl p 12 also exhibited specific IgE to Phl p 7 and 26/220 (11.8%) subjects had specific IgE against rPhl p 7. Particularly, geometric mean (25th-75th percentile) of specific IgE to rPar j 2 were as follows: 2.87 kUA/l (1.005-7.465). Out of 73 patients with specific IgE to rPar j 2, 7 subjects (9.6%) had also specific IgE to rPhl p 7, 12 (16.4%) had specific IgE to rPhl p 12 and 4 (4.1%) patients had specific IgE to both recombinant allergens. Of 37 patients under an ultra-rush protocol of SLIT, 3 subjects (8.1%) experienced generalized urticaria, and 1 of them also had diarrhea 3 h after the last dose of Parietaria judaica extract oral-vaccine administration. On the contrary, no systemic reactions were observed in 105 patients after Phleum pratense extract oral intake after a similar ultra-rush SLIT protocol (p = 0.0046). CONCLUSIONS: In the light of present findings, allergen extract-based diagnosis, in vivo and in vitro, cannot discriminate allergic patients that are genuinely sensitized to Parietaria spp. major allergens or to other major allergens to which current immunotherapeutic allergy extracts are standardized. Therefore, in vitro component resolved diagnosis is the unique tool to define the disease eliciting molecule(s). Finally, during sublingual immunotherapy, not only the dose of allergen, but also the biochemical characteristic of the major allergen administered may be an important factor in determining possible systemic reactions.     

Inhalant allergy to fresh asparagus

Background Two patients experienced itehing conjunctivitis, running nose, tightness of the throat and coughing during preparation of fresh asparagus. Eating asparagus after cooking did not provoke any allergie symptoms. Both patients were atopic. sensitized additionally to pollens of grasses and trees as well as to onion. Objective To assess the hypersensilivity reactions to Iresh and heated asparagus and to investigate any crossreactivities among the allergens. Methods Skin-prick tests were perfonned with commercial allergens and native asparagus and the patienls were tesled with Pharmacia CAP system for specific IgE antibodies against asparagus, onion, garlic, birch pollen, mugwort pollen and two recombinant birch pollen allergens, Bet v I and profilin. Inhibition of IgE antibody binding to solid phase homologous and unrelated allergens by increasing doses of liquid allergens (inhibitors) was studied. Results Skin-prick tests with native green and white asparagus were strongly positive, but negative with cooked asparagus. Both patients had measurable levels of IgE antibodies against asparagus (3.0 and 6.2kU/L respectively) and several other allergens. One patienl was highly sensitive to birch and Bet v I. Both were positive to profilin, mugwort and onion. In all cases the antibody uptake could be extensively and specifically inhibited by homologous allergen. The asparagus-specific IgE antibodies of the two patients could only be inhibited by asparagus. No inhibition was obtained after heating of the asparagus extract to 100°C. Conclusions The patients were speeifically sensitized by asparagus. No immunological crossreactions could be observed. The measurements of IgE antibodies to other allergens were also specific, representing parallel multiple sensitivity. Profilin inhibited profilin-specific IgE binding but did not react with the asparagus-specific IgE antibodies of these patients. The asparagus allergen recognized by the specific IgE antibodies of these patients was thermolabile.     

A new in vitro model for testing of food allergens: Allergen‐specific mediator release of passively sensitized rat Basophil Leukaemia cells

An assay based on allergen‐specific mediator release of rat basophil leukaemia cells (RBL cells) was investigated as a possible new tool for the in vitro testing of food allergens. The RBL‐2H3 cells were sensitized passively with diluted murine pool sera containing IgE specific for food and pollen allergens. These sera were obtained from BALB/c mice after low‐dose intraperitoneal injection of birch pollen, celery and peanut extracts. Comparative immunoblotting with murine and human IgE demonstrated that the murine IgE response was directed predominantly against known major allergens. Subsequent to sensitization of the RBL cells with antiserum against birch pollen allergens, apple allergy was used as an immunological model of birch pollen related food hypersensitivities. The known cross‐reaction of the major allergens of birch pollen and apple was reproduced completely by the mediator release measured in the murine in vitro assay. The ranking of allergenic potency obtained for these allergens agreed closely with the results of histamine release analyses performed with blood samples of allergic patients. In addition, murine sera against celery tuber were used to study the influence of thermal and non‐thermal food processing on the allergenic potency of the food. Again, the results corresponded to previous data obtained in allergic humans and indicated a reduction of potency due to the application of heat, but a high residual biological activity in many mildly processed products. Finally, spurious contaminations of peanut protein in commercial foods could be detected specifically at a concentration of at least 0.01%. This assay is suitable for many applications in food allergen research.     

Position paper of the EAACI: food allergy due to immunological cross‐reactions with common inhalant allergens

In older children, adolescents, and adults, a substantial part of all IgE‐mediated food allergies is caused by cross‐reacting allergenic structures shared by inhalants and foods. IgE stimulated by a cross‐reactive inhalant allergen can result in diverse patterns of allergic reactions to various foods. Local, mild, or severe systemic reactions may occur already after the first consumption of a food containing a cross‐reactive allergen. In clinical practice, clinically relevant sensitizations are elucidated by skin prick testing or by the determination of specific IgE in vitro. Component‐resolved diagnosis may help to reach a diagnosis and may predict the risk of a systemic reaction. Allergy needs to be confirmed in cases of unclear history by oral challenge tests. The therapeutic potential of allergen immunotherapy with inhalant allergens in pollen‐related food allergy is not clear, and more placebo‐controlled studies are needed. As we are facing an increasing incidence of pollen allergies, a shift in sensitization patterns and changes in nutritional habits, and the occurrence of new, so far unknown allergies due to cross‐reactions are expected.     

The performance of a component-based allergen-microarray in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Currently, the diagnosis of IgE-mediated allergy is based on allergen-specific history and diagnostic procedures using natural allergen extracts for in vivo and in vitro tests. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to comparatively analyse a new component-based allergen-microarray and the 'quasi-standard' ImmunoCAP for their clinical relevance in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to five aeroallergens [house dust mite (HDM), cat dander, birch, grass and mugwort pollen] in a prospective, double-centre study. METHODS: We enrolled 120 subjects at the two study centres. Allergic patients were defined as having an allergen-specific history plus a concomitant positive skin-prick test (SPT) to natural allergen extracts and specific serum IgE was measured by both methods. Each allergen was analysed separately. RESULTS: The microarray performed equally well in receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses when compared with the CAP in cat (23 allergic vs 97 non-allergic, ROC area under the curve microarray 0.950 vs CAP 0.894, P = 0.211), birch (31/89, 0.908 vs 0.878, P = 0.483) and grass pollen (47/73, 0.923 vs 0.915, P = 0.770). It was slightly less sensitive in HDM-allergic subjects (26 allergic vs 94 non-allergic, ROC area microarray 0.808 vs CAP 0.911, P = 0.053) and displayed a reduced sensitivity in the mugwort pollen-allergic patients (17/103, 0.723 vs 0.879, P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Component-based testing and the whole-allergen CAP are equally relevant in the diagnosis of grass-, birch- and cat-allergic patients. Although slightly less sensitive, the microarray is sufficient for the diagnosis of HDM-allergic patients, but needs alternative and/or additional components for detecting mugwort allergy.     

Prevalence of adverse reactions to food in patients with gastrointestinal disease

The role of allergic reactions in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome has been disputed. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of adverse reactions to food in patients with gastrointestinal disease. A total of 375 adult patients of a gastroenterologic outpatient clinic were examined by history, skin tests, measurements of laboratory parameters, and intestinal provocation with food allergens by colonoscopy. Some 32% complained of adverse reactions to food as a cause of their abdominal symptoms. In 14.4%, the diagnosis of intestinal food allergy could be suspected according to several criteria such as elevated total IgE, specific IgE against food antigens, eosinophilia, responsiveness to cromoglycate, and clinical signs of atopic disease. In 3.2%, the diagnosis could be confirmed by endoscopic allergen provocation and/or elimination diet and rechallenge. In conclusion, the data suggest that allergic reactions to food antigens may be a causative factor in a subgroup of patients with inflammatory and functional gastrointestinal disease.     

Dichotomy of food and inhalant allergen sensitization in eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is an emerging condition where patients commonly present with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and fail to respond adequately to anti-reflux therapy. Food allergy is currently recognized as the main immunological cause of EE; recent evidence suggests an etiological role for inhalant allergens. The presence of EE appears to be associated with other atopic illnesses. OBJECTIVES: To report the sensitization profile of both food and inhalant allergens in our EE patient cohort in relation to age, and to profile the prevalence of other allergic conditions in patients with EE. METHOD: The study prospectively analyzed allergen sensitization profiles using skin prick tests to common food allergens and inhalant allergens in 45 children with EE. Patch testing to common food allergens was performed on 33 patients in the same cohort. Comorbidity of atopic eczema, asthma, allergic rhinitis and anaphylaxis were obtained from patient history. RESULTS: Younger patients with EE showed more IgE and patch sensitization to foods while older patients showed greater IgE sensitization to inhalant allergens. The prevalence of atopic eczema, allergic rhinitis and asthma was significantly increased in our EE cohort compared with the general Australian population. A total of 24% of our cohort of patients with EE had a history of anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: In children with EE, the sensitization to inhalant allergens increases with age, particularly after 4 years. Also, specific enquiry about severe food reactions in patients presenting with EE is strongly recommended as it appears this patient group has a high incidence of anaphylaxis.     

The allergen profile of beech and oak pollen

Background Beech and oak pollen are potential allergen sources with a world‐wide distribution. Objective We aimed to characterize the allergen profile of beech and oak pollen and to study cross‐reactivities with birch and grass pollen allergens. Methods Sera from tree pollen‐allergic patients with evidence for beech and oak pollen sensitization from Basel, Switzerland, (n=23) and sera from birch pollen‐allergic patients from Vienna, Austria, (n=26) were compared in immunoblot experiments for IgE reactivity to birch (Betula pendula syn. verrucosa), beech (Fagus sylvatica) and oak (Quercus alba) pollen allergens. Subsequently, beech and oak pollen allergens were characterized by IgE inhibition experiments with purified recombinant and natural allergens and with allergen‐specific antibody probes. Birch‐, beech‐ and oak pollen‐specific IgE levels were determined by ELISA. Results Beech and oak pollen contain allergens that cross‐react with the birch pollen allergens Bet v 1, Bet v 2 and Bet v 4 and with the berberine bridge enzyme‐like allergen Phl p 4 from timothy grass pollen. Sera from Swiss and Austrian patients exhibited similar IgE reactivity profiles to birch, beech and oak pollen extracts. IgE levels to beech and oak pollen allergens were lower than those to birch pollen allergens. Conclusion IgE reactivity to beech pollen is mainly due to cross‐reactivity with birch pollen allergens, and a Phl p 4‐like molecule represented another predominant IgE‐reactive structure in oak pollen. The characterization of beech and oak pollen allergens and their cross‐reactivity is important for the diagnosis and treatment of beech and oak pollen allergy.     

Effects of IL-4 and IL-13 on total and allergen specific IgE production by cultured PBMC from allergic patients determined with recombinant pollen allergens

Background: Interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 have been shown to be potent switch factors for IgE synthesis in human B cells. Objective: In this study we investigated the effects of recombinant human IL-4 and IL-13 on total and allergen specific IgE synthesis by peripheral blood inononuclear colls (PBMC) from pollen allergic patients and healthy control individuals. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from allergic patients were investigated for their capacity to produce allergen specific IgE in vitro. Total protein extracts from birch pollen and timothy grass pollen as well as purified recombinant birch pollen allergens, Bet v I, birch profiling (Bet v II) and recombinant timothy grass pollen allergens. Phi p I, Phi p II, and Phi p V were used to measure specific IgE-antibody synthesis in cell culture supernatants by IgE-immunoblot and ELISA. Reults PBMC obtained from allergic patients spontaneously secreted allergen specific IgE in the culture supernatants. Addition of Interleukin 4, Interleukin 13 and anti-CD40 antibody to the cultures alone or in combinations significantly induced total IgE production whereas allergen specific IgE production was not affected. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the peripheral blood of allergic individuals contains long lived allergen specific B cells which have already switched to IgE production and which are not sensitive to IL-4 and IL-13 treatment. These results may have implications on attempts to use cytokines or cytokine antagonists in therapy of Type I allergy.     

Association between sensitized to food allergens and childhood allergic respiratory diseases in Taiwan

BackgroundSensitization to allergen has long been known to be relate to childhood allergic diseases. Polysensitised children have more severe atopic diseases, whereas allergic rhinitis or asthma children with cosensitized to food and inhalant allergens were under-researched.ObjectiveTo realize the association between sensitization to food allergens and pediatric allergic rhinitis and asthma in Taiwan.MethodsWe included 138 participants with sensitized to allergen as assessed by serum-specific IgE. 87 of 138 participants had allergic rhinitis and 51 participants had asthma. All participants underwent a physical examination and measurement of serum total and specific IgE values. Besides, nasal peak expiratory flow rate (nPEFR) that was performed by the participants with allergic rhinitis and were requested to complete the Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaires (PRQLQ). Lung function test and asthma control test (ACT)/child asthma control test (C-ACT) were performed by the participants with asthma.Results39 of 87 allergic rhinitis participants with sensitized to food and inhalant allergens (AR food group), 48 of 87 allergic rhinitis participants with sensitized to inhalant allergen alone (AR inhalant group). The AR food group had significantly lower nPEFR values and higher total IgE values (p < 0.05) compared with the AR inhalant group. The AR food group had higher PRQLQ scores than the AR inhalant group. 24 of 51 asthma participants with sensitized to food and inhalant allergens (Asthma food group), 27 of 51 asthma participants with sensitized to inhalant allergen alone (Asthma inhalant group). The Asthma food group had significantly higher total IgE values (p < 0.05) compared with the Asthma inhalant group. The Asthma food group had lower lung function test values and asthma control test (ACT) scores than the other group.ConclusionsChildren with cosensitized to food and inhalant allergens have more severe clinical symptoms and abnormal laboratory findings. Sensitization to food allergen was more related to pediatric allergic rhinitis than asthma. We may need larger, longer and extended studies to confirm these findings.     

Cabbage lipid transfer protein Bra o 3 is a major allergen responsible for cross-reactivity between plant foods and pollens

BACKGROUND: Food IgE-mediated allergy to members of the Brassicaceae family has been increasingly reported. OBJECTIVE: To characterize cabbage-Brassica oleracea var capitata-allergy and its major allergens. METHODS: A prospective study was performed, recruiting 17 patients allergic to cabbage, and control subjects. Skin prick tests and double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges were performed. A major allergen was isolated from cabbage by RP-HPLC and characterized by N-terminal amino acid sequencing and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry analysis. Specific IgE determinations, IgE immunoblots, and CAP-inhibition assays were also performed. RESULTS: Skin prick test and specific IgE were positive to cabbage in all patients. Five of them referred anaphylactic reactions when eating cabbage, and in another 5 patients, cabbage allergy was further confirmed by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge. Most of them showed associated sensitizations to mugwort pollen, mustard, and peach. A 9-kd cabbage IgE-binding protein, Bra o 3, was identified as a lipid transfer protein (LTP) with 50% of identity to peach LTP Pru p 3. Skin prick test with Bra o 3 showed positive results in 12 of 14 cases (86%). On CAP inhibition assays, Bra o 3 managed to inhibit significantly the IgE binding to cabbage, mugwort pollen, and peach. Both Bra o 3 and Pru p 3 were recognized by IgE from the patients' sera. CONCLUSION: Bra o 3, a cabbage LTP, is a major allergen in this food, cross-reacting with mugwort pollen and with other plant foods, such as peach. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Cabbage IgE-mediated allergy is a potentially severe condition that can present with other plant food and pollen allergies.     

Analysis of the sensitization profile towards allergens in central Africa

BACKGROUND: Almost no information is available regarding the prevalence of IgE-mediated allergies and the disease-eliciting allergens in tropical Africa. OBJECTIVE: To study IgE-mediated allergies and the allergen profile in allergic patients from Zimbabwe. METHODS: The frequency of sensitization to common environmental allergen sources was determined by skin prick testing in 650 allergic patients from Zimbabwe. Fifty representative sera were analysed for IgE reactivity to 20 respiratory and 20 food allergen extracts by multiallergen extract testing. The IgE reactivity profiles to recombinant pollen and mite allergens were compared between grass pollen- and mite-sensitized patients from Zimbabwe and central Europe. Sera from grass pollen-allergic patients were also analysed for IgE reactivity to nitrocellulose-blotted natural timothy grass and Bermuda grass pollen allergens. RESULTS: IgE-mediated allergies were found to be common in Zimbabwe. Similar to the situation in central Europe, mites and grass pollens represented the most prevalent allergen sources. However, the IgE reactivity profiles determined with single recombinant pollen and mite allergens revealed interesting differences between the European and African patients, which most likely reflect the local allergen exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The striking differences regarding sensitization to grass pollen and mite allergens between African and European patients revealed by recombinant allergen-based testing emphasize the need for component-resolved allergy testing to optimize allergy prevention and therapy in different populations.     

The impact of pollen-related food allergens on pollen allergy

Patients with birch pollen allergy frequently develop hypersensitivity reactions to certain foods, e.g. apples, celery, carrots and hazelnuts. These reactions are mainly caused by IgE-antibodies specific for the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, which cross-react with homologous proteins in these foods. Analyzing the T-cell response to Bet v 1-related food allergens revealed that these dietary proteins contain several distinct T-cell epitopes and activate Bet v 1-specific T cells to proliferate and produce cytokines. Several of these cross-reactive T-cell epitopes were not destroyed by simulated gastrointestinal digestion of food allergens and stimulated Bet v 1-specific T cells despite nonreactivity with IgE antibodies. Similarly, cooked food allergens did not elicit IgE-mediated symptoms (oral allergy syndromes) but caused T-cell-mediated late-phase reactions (deterioration of atopic eczema) in birch pollen-allergic patients with atopic dermatitis because thermal processing affected their conformational structure and not the primary amino acid sequence. Thus, T-cell cross-reactivity between Bet v 1 and related food allergens occurs independently of IgE-cross-reactivity in vitro and in vivo. We speculate that symptom-free consumption of pollen-related food allergens may have implications for the pollen-specific immune response of allergic individuals.     

Celery allergy confirmed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge: a clinical study in 32 subjects with a history of adverse reactions to celery root

BACKGROUND: Celery root is a frequent cause of food allergy in pollen-sensitized patients. Because of problems in blinding challenges with fresh vegetables and the risk of anaphylactic reactions, no double-blind, placebo-controlled, food challenges (DBPCFCs) with celery have been published so far. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to confirm the clinical relevance of celery as a food allergen by DBPCFCs and to evaluate current diagnostic procedures in patients with true allergy. METHODS: DBPCFCs were performed in 32 patients with a history of an allergic reaction to celery. The patients underwent skin prick tests (SPTs) with celery extracts, crude celery, and different pollen extracts. Specific IgE for celery was determined by using the CAP method. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 32 patients had a positive DBPCFC result. Two patients reacted to placebo, and 8 patients did not respond to the challenge. Of the nonresponders, 4 reacted to an open provocation with celery. The sensitivity of CAP determination for specific IgE (> or =0.7 kU/L) to celery in patients with a positive DBPCFC result was 73%, 48% to 86% for SPTs (> or =3 mm) with commercial extracts, and 96% for prick-to-prick tests with crude celery. The positive predictive value of the SPT and CAP tests was between 87% and 96%, whereas the specificity and negative predictive values were poor. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the importance of celery as a food allergen for use in DBPCFCs. The SPT and CAP methods proved to be reliable for the diagnosis of a relevant allergy to celery in regard to sensitivity and positive predictive value but not to specificity and negative predictive value.     

Melon sensitivity shares allergens with Plantago and grass pollens

Possible associations between allergy to pollen and that to food allergens were studied in 262 patients sensitized to pollen. Forty-four patients (16.7%) showed some allergic symptoms after testing with fruits and vegetables, melon being the food most frequently involved (24 patients), followed by sunflower seed (12 patients). Skin testing was done by the prick method with natural fruit or vegetable, and also with commercial food extracts. We found in our region that the distribution of sensitivity to pollens in the group of patients with allergy to fruits or vegetables does not coincide with the prevalence in pollen-allergic subjects in general, since in the first group -subjects allergic to food - there was a major prevalence of allergy to Plantago ( P < 0.01). In particular, in the group of subjects allergic to melon, the prevalence of sensitivity to grass and especially to Plantago was larger than in pollen-allergic subjects in general ( P < 0.05 and P 0.001, respectively). The use of fresh food produced better results than commercial extracts. A positive skin test to fresh melon closely correlated with positive CAP results. CAP inhibition experiments were carried out, and we found that Dactylis and Plantago extracts inhibited the binding of the melon-positive pool to solid-phase melon. The results suggest the existence of common antigenic epitopes in melon and Plantago pollen, and in melon and grass pollen.     

Array-based profiling of ragweed and mugwort pollen allergens

Background: Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) pollen is the main cause of allergic reactions in late summer and autumn. The differential diagnosis between ragweed and mugwort pollen allergy is a frequent problem encountered by allergologists in areas where both plants are present due to shared antigenic structures and overlapping flowering seasons. Objective: To evaluate the sensitization pattern of weed allergic patients towards a large panel of purified allergens in the microarray format and by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Methods: Eight ragweed and six mugwort pollen allergens were purified from natural source or expressed as recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli. Allergens were spotted on protein microarray slides or coated onto ELISA plates. Sera from 19 ragweed and/or mugwort allergic individuals were used to determine the reactivity towards single molecules in both assays. Results: All ragweed allergic individuals were sensitized to Amb a 1, among them 30% were monosensitized to the major ragweed allergen. Art v 1 and Art v 3 were recognized by 89% of mugwort pollen‐allergic patients. Extensive cross‐reactivity was observed for both patient groups mainly involving the pan‐allergens profilin and nonspecific lipid transfer proteins. Comparable IgE profiles were obtained with both allergen microarray and ELISA methods. Conclusions: Molecule‐based diagnosis provides essential information for the differential diagnosis between ragweed and mugwort pollen allergy and for the selection of the appropriate allergen source for specific immunotherapy.     

Pru p 3, a marker allergen for lipid transfer protein sensitization also in Central Europe

In the Mediterranean area, lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are important causes of plant‐food allergies often associated with severe allergic reactions. There, peach LTP (Pru p 3) seems to be the primary sensitizer, whereas in Central Europe, little is known about the importance of LTP sensitization. In this region, allergen extract‐based diagnosis is often complicated by co‐sensitization to Bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, its cross‐reactive food allergens, and profilins. We investigated the role of LTP sensitization in Central European patients displaying strong allergic reactions to plant‐derived food. Analysis of IgE reactivity revealed that ten of thirteen patients were sensitized to Pru p 3, nine to Bet v 1, and two to profilin. Our results showed that LTP sensitization represents a risk factor for severe allergic symptoms in Central Europe. Furthermore, the strong IgE reactivity detected in immunoblots of plant‐food extracts indicated that Pru p 3 can be used as a marker allergen for LTP sensitization also in Central European patients.