Shop around before enrolling in managed care plans

Managed care programs have a significant impact on AIDS patients, 60 percent of whom receive Medicaid. Information on Medicaid managed care programs is limited. It is important for patients to investigate whether a specialist with experience in HIV care is available, or if their plan will readily provide patients access to a physician who has experience. Patients also should determine whether the managed care plan uses current treatment standards and whether it has a limited drug formulary. Managed care plans should have a grievance procedure set up to resolve disputes, and provide services such as nutritional and substance abuse counseling. A glossary of health care terms is provided.     

State policy and practice regarding substance abuse treatment services for medicaid recipients with disabilities

This article presents the results of an exploratory study conducted to identify best practice Medicaid managed care models for people with disabilities who need substance abuse treatment services. These results suggest that there is wide variation in the managed care strategies that states use to provide substance abuse treatment services to the SSI disabled population, that state policymakers are often focused on general program management issues rather than addressing specific issues related to providing substance abuse treatment services to people with disabilities, and that although managed care theoretically offers opportunities for creativity,this practice does not appear to be widespread under current Medicaid managed care arrangements for people with disabilities.     

AIDS advocates, caregivers must play major role in managed care debates

As managed care becomes the primary delivery mode for health maintenance organizations and more states try to shift Medicaid programs to managed care, HIV-positive patients and providers should become active in making sure their states formulate adequate Medicaid managed care plans. People with HIV have experienced problems with Medicaid managed care plans, including restricted access to HIV-experienced providers and specialists, restricted availability of drugs through the plan, and limited coverage of pharmaceuticals. AIDS advocates helped to reject Medicaid waiver proposals in New York City and New York State by showing that managed care companies were not prepared to provide adequate care to HIV-positive patients. The shift to managed care has created opportunities to improve health care. The first Medicaid managed care program specifically for AIDS patients was created last year in Los Angeles and is now operating successfully. A New York state law implemented this year is designed to make it easier for people with AIDS and other chronic diseases to join health maintenance organizations and to see specialists without referrals, in exchange for higher premiums and copayments.     

Florida program offers new method of HIV care

Florida launched a novel disease management program to provide a better continuum of care and to make the State's Medicaid funding for HIV/AIDS more cost-effective. The program, funded by $9 million from the State, will track health care services for 7,500 HIV-positive Floridians who qualify for Medicaid. The participants will receive health care coverage from Medicaid, and their cases will be tracked by nurses. The program will also hold educational forums for doctors since 40 percent of HIV patients in Florida are receiving care from physicians who do not specialize in HIV treatment.     

Costs of HIV medical care in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVES: In the USA, Medicaid is the principal payer of the health care costs of patients with HIV infection. We wished to determine how the costs to Medicaid of patients in Maryland infected with HIV have changed in the setting of highly active antiretroviral treatment. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. METHODS: Analysis of combined economic and clinical data of patients from the Johns Hopkins HIV Service, the provider of primary and sub-specialty care for a majority of HIV-infected patients in the Baltimore metropolitan region. All patients were enrolled in Medicaid and received care longitudinally in Maryland from 1 January 1995 through 31 December 1997. Monthly Medicaid payments were calculated for all inpatient and outpatient services by fiscal year, CD4 cell count, and use of protease inhibitors. RESULTS: For inpatients with a CD4 cell count < or = 50 x 10(6) cells/l, the total health care average monthly payments remained unchanged ($2629 in 1995, $2585 in 1997). Total mean monthly payments increased for those with a CD4 cell count > 50 x 10(6) cells/l (CD4 cell count 50-200 x 10(6) cells/l, $1172 in 1995 and $1615 in 1997, P < 0.05; CD4 cell count 201-500 x 10(6) cells/l, $1078 in 1995 and $1305 in 1997, P < 0.05). However, when data were stratified according to use of a protease inhibitor-containing regimen (used during approximately 50% of follow-up time in 1996-1997) it was found that hospital inpatient payments decreased significantly in all CD4 strata for patients on a protease inhibitor-containing regimen whereas pharmacy payments increased significantly. Inpatient payments associated with treating opportunistic illness were lower in 1996-1997 for patients receiving protease inhibitor therapy compared with those not receiving protease inhibitors. On balance, total health care payments tended to be slightly lower for patients receiving a protease inhibitor regimen. CONCLUSION: Although protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral regimens are being used by only about half of our Medicaid-insured patients, when they are used, there are significantly lower hospital inpatient and community care costs, as well as lower costs associated with the treatment of opportunistic illness. Even with the concurrent increase in their pharmacy costs, total health care costs were stable or slightly lower for these patients. We believe this is a favorable result suggesting a good clinical value being achieved without an increase in costs.     

Managed long-term care: care integration through care coordination

The New York State managed long-term care demonstration program combines traditional home, community, and institutional long-term care services with other benefits integral to maximizing overall well-being for a frail elderly population. A distinguishing feature of the model is the responsibility to coordinate both covered and noncovered services. This article, a case study of VNS CHOICE, a managed long-term care plan that serves 2,500 New York City residents, describes the program's operating structure, service delivery model, and care management strategies. By providing a capitated Medicaid long-term care benefit, VNS CHOICE can utilize a broad array of services, offer significant flexibility to care management staff, and support member and family involvement in care planning. Its broad care coordination responsibility allows it to achieve integrated care without integrated financing.     

Understanding the variation in costs among HIV primary care providers

The paper uses a hybrid cost model to identify the determinants of cost variation among programs that offer early intervention services to people living with HIV and AIDS in the US. The model combines the effects of input price and output volume measures from traditional economic cost functions with institutional factors based on program and patient characteristics on the cost of providing primary medical care and support services to people living with HIV and AIDS. The impact of economic factors conforms to conventional theory and reveals the potential for cost savings through greater economies of scale and substitutability of low cost for high cost labor inputs. Similarly, programs that use staff more efficiently and share an affiliation with other organizations exhibit lower costs than more labor intensive and non-affiliated providers. However, patient characteristics are equally important determinants of program spending. Minority patients use services less frequently and generate fewer costs, while patients facing fewer barriers to care, such as those with Medicaid coverage, access services more frequently and incur higher costs. Uninsured patients also generate higher costs, but the higher costs associated with this subgroup more likely stem from a lack of continuity in care and, thus, poorer health status and greater healthcare needs when treatment is sought. Injection drug users require less expensive services, but access services more frequently than other risk groups, while patients with an AIDS diagnosis and those who are co-infected with hepatitis C require more program resources. By separately estimating the economic and institutional determinants of program costs, the study highlights the relative importance of factors that are amendable to internal cost control efforts versus those that reflect the resource needs of local communities.     

Medicaid managed care questions for your state

AIDS advocates declare that input from providers and patients is essential to insure that HIV-positive patients receive adequate coverage when the States take over Medicaid funding from the Federal government. AIDS Action Foundation in Washington, D.C. offers areas to focus on when examining a State's goals for funding. The Foundation suggests that interested parties question the State's waiver program, the requirements for mandatory enrollment in managed care plans, and the availability of expert HIV/AIDS treatment providers.     

Preliminary outcomes of a pilot physical therapy program for HIV-infected patients with chronic pain

Chronic pain in HIV-infected individuals is common and often undertreated. Physical therapy (PT) is an evidence-based nonpharmacologic treatment for chronic pain. Our objective is to present the results of a pilot PT program in an HIV pain/palliative care clinic, which is embedded within a Ryan White-funded multidisciplinary HIV primary care clinic. Medical records of HIV-infected patients participating in a PT program between November 2012 and July 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Pain scores on a 0–10 scale and cost data were collected and analyzed. Among 43 patients referred, 27 collectively attended 86 sessions. Median age of enrolled patients was 54 (IQR 49–58). Sixteen (59%) were African-American and 20 (77%) had an undetectable HIV viral load. Mean pain score at initial visit was 6.5 (SD = 1.1). The average session-level decrease was 2.6 (SD = 1.7) and patient-level decrease was 2.5 (SD = 1.2). The largest payors were Medicare managed care (28%), Medicaid (21%), and Ryan White grant-related funds (18%). When the first four months of the program are excluded to account for slow start-up, the program's monthly net revenue during the remaining five months was $163. We present preliminary data from a low-cost pilot PT program integrated into an HIV clinic in a primary care setting associated with clinically significant improvements in pain. Further investigation into the implementation of such programs is essential.     

Just for Us: an academic medical center-community partnership to maintain the health of a frail low-income senior population

PURPOSE: To promote health and maintain independence, Just for Us provides financially sustainable, in-home, integrated care to medically fragile, low-income seniors and disabled adults living in subsidized housing. DESIGN AND METHODS: The program provides primary care, care management, and mental health services delivered in patient's homes by a multidisciplinary, multiagency team. RESULTS: After 2 years of operation, Just for Us is serving nearly 300 individuals in 10 buildings. The program is demonstrating improvement in individual indices of health. Medicaid expenditures for enrollees are shifting from ambulances and hospital services to pharmacy, personal care, and outpatient visits. The program is not breaking even, but it is moving toward that goal. The program's success is based on a partnership involving an academic medical center, a community health center, county social and mental health agencies, and a city housing authority to coordinate and leverage services. IMPLICATIONS: Just for Us is becoming a financially sustainable way of creating a "system within a nonsystem" for low-income elderly persons in clustered housing.     

More States are expanding Medicaid reimbursement for poor HIV patients

New technology and medications are making HIV a more treatable illness. However, many in the AIDS service community are frustrated by Medicaid regulations that prevent people with HIV from receiving treatment because they may not be considered disabled. Sen. Robert Torricelli (D-NJ) and Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) recently sponsored legislation that would allow States to expand their Medicaid coverage to include low-income people who have HIV, however the legislation did not pass. In response, some States are beginning to pass their own legislation regarding Medicaid access. The AIDS Action Committee of Massachusetts successfully lobbied the Massachusetts State legislature to expand Medicaid access to people with HIV. In addition, several other states including Tennessee and Oregon already have programs which provide low-income, HIV-positive people with coverage for clinical care. The AIDS Drug Assistance Program (ADAP), a Federal program which covers medication costs but not clinical care, is also discussed.     

AIDS mortality rates lower at sites with HIV experience

HIV/AIDS patients are more likely to receive antiretroviral treatment and survive longer if they are treated by providers who have more experience treating the disease. Researchers examined data on more than 7,000 AIDS patients treated in 333 California hospitals to come to that conclusion. Another study discovered that pregnant HIV-infected women were more likely to receive treatment if they were at medical centers which performed HIV clinical trials or at State-funded sites with HIV services for people on Medicaid. Public hospitals had a higher mortality rate than for-profit and nonprofit hospitals. Part of the disparity can be linked to capitation arrangements by insurers that forces physicians to limit the time with HIV patients. In addition, private practice physicians rarely have time to keep up with medical advances related to HIV. HIV/AIDS patients might receive better care when a primary care physician shares efforts with specialists.     

The Events in Care Screening Questionnaire (ECSQ): a new tool to identify needs and concerns of people with HIV/AIDS

The purpose of this paper is to present validation data on the Events in Care Screening Questionnaire (ECSQ), which was designed to identify the needs and concerns of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) in nine specific domains: adherence to medical instructions; medical problems; specialty and inpatient hospital care; preventive health care and screening and behavioral health; sexual risk behavior; family planning; psychological symptoms; substance use; and life circumstances and demands. The ECSQ is the anchor for a more comprehensive measure called "The Dynamics of Care," and was administered in the context of a longitudinal study to evaluate New York State's HIV Special Needs Plan (HIV SNP), a Medicaid managed care model for PLWHA. Participants in the study, which began in March 2003 and closed recruitment in January 2007, were NYC PLWHA who were enrolled in either a Medicaid HIV SNP or Fee-For-Service plan. Participants were recruited through HIV SNP enrollment lists, direct on-site recruitment, and fliers. The specific event domains covered in the ECSQ were selected based on the purpose of the HIV SNP and the literature describing the needs and challenges that PLWHA face. Analyses are based on data from 628 study respondents over two times points. Results suggest that the concerns identified by PLWHA were largely consistent with their health care situation, heath status, risk behavior, and personal characteristics. Findings presented here lend support for the construct validity of the ECSQ and demonstrate its value as a starting point for inquiring more fully about the experiences of patients and improving the care they receive.     

Medicaid home care services and survival in New York City

PURPOSE: New York City's Medicaid Home Care Services Program provides an integrated program of housekeeping and personal assistance care along with regular nursing assessments. We sought to determine if this program of supportive care offers a survival benefit to older adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: Administrative data from New York City's Medicaid Home Care Services Program were merged with epidemiologic and diagnostic data collected in a community study of older adults living in northern Manhattan. Of 866 older adults with Medicaid coverage living in the community, 288 (33.3%) received Medicaid home care services in the period from 1994 to 1996. Mortality was tracked through the end of 1999. RESULTS: In proportional hazards models that adjusted for differences in sociodemographic, medical, and functional status, use of Medicaid home care service was associated with a significantly reduced risk of death in people with disability in activities of daily living. IMPLICATIONS: Because the program has distinctive features (greater number of weekly hours than other programs, integration with nursing assessments), it is a special case of community-based long-term care. Still, results from this observational cohort suggest that mortality risk in the most vulnerable elderly population can be reduced through a program of supportive care.     

The Impact of Publicly Funded Managed Care on Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment Outcomes

This study compares the 12-month changes in substance use following admission to substance abuse treatment in Massachusetts between adolescents enrolled in Medicaid managed care and other publicly funded adolescents. Two hundred and fifty-five adolescents were interviewed as they entered substance abuse treatment and at 6 and 12 month follow-ups. Medicaid enrollment data were used to determine the managed care enrollment status. One hundred forty two (56%) adolescents were in the managed care group and 113 (44%) comprise the comparison group. Substance use outcomes include a count of negative consequences of substance use, days of alcohol use, days of cannabis use, and days of any substance use in the previous 30 days. Repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to assess change with time of measurement and managed care status as main effects and the interaction of time and managed care included to measure differences between the groups over time. Although several changes across time were detected for all four outcomes, we found no evidence of an impact of managed care for any of the outcomes. The results of our study do not support the fears that behavioral managed care, by imposing limits on services provided, would substantially reduce the effectiveness of substance abuse treatment for adolescents. At the same time, the results do not support those who believe that the continuity of care and improved resource utilization claimed for managed care would improve outcomes.     

The impact of publicly funded managed care on adolescent substance abuse treatment outcomes

This study compares the 12-month changes in substance use following admission to substance abuse treatment in Massachusetts between adolescents enrolled in Medicaid managed care and other publicly funded adolescents. Two hundred and fifty-five adolescents were interviewed as they entered substance abuse treatment and at 6 and 12 month follow-ups. Medicaid enrollment data were used to determine the managed care enrollment status. One hundred forty two (56%) adolescents were in the managed care group and 113 (44%) comprise the comparison group. Substance use outcomes include a count of negative consequences of substance use, days of alcohol use, days of cannabis use, and days of any substance use in the previous 30 days. Repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used to assess change with time of measurement and managed care status as main effects and the interaction of time and managed care included to measure differences between the groups over time. Although several changes across time were detected for all four outcomes, we found no evidence of an impact of managed care for any of the outcomes. The results of our study do not support the fears that behavioral managed care, by imposing limits on services provided, would substantially reduce the effectiveness of substance abuse treatment for adolescents. At the same time, the results do not support those who believe that the continuity of care and improved resource utilization claimed for managed care would improve outcomes.     

After long delays, Hopkins offers AIDS managed care

Johns Hopkins University's AIDS program is about to offer a capitated rate structure for the State's Medicaid population. Some experts believe that putting Medicaid patients under managed care could be disastrous if rates are capitated. AIDS care, which has recently been seen as part of primary care, is moving back to specialized treatment, which has been more cost-effective. AIDS patients treated by specialists have shorter hospital stays and remain healthy longer.     

Age, consumer direction, and outcomes of supportive services at home

PURPOSE: Supportive services at home are essential for older people with severe chronic impairments. Newer "consumer-directed" models of organizing home-based services rely heavily on service recipients rather than home care agencies to arrange and direct care at home. This study examined differences in service experience and outcomes between recipients over and under age 65 who direct their own services in one large Medicaid program. DESIGN AND METHODS: A random sample of 1,095 recipients of In-Home Supportive Services in California was selected and interviewed by telephone. Interviews were conducted in English, Spanish, and three Asian languages; those with severe cognitive impairment were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Findings indicate that although younger recipients embrace self-direction more enthusiastically than older ones, age differences are small on a majority of service outcomes. On average, older users embrace this model and manage within it much like younger users. Some differences emerge between the young-old (65-74) and old-old (75+), but these are neither consistent nor determinative. IMPLICATIONS: Old age is far from an inevitable barrier to self-direction. As with other age groups, there are opportunities and obstacles to be addressed as this newer approach to home care is disseminated.     

The social organization of HIV/AIDS care in treatment programmes for adults with serious mental illness

As the HIV epidemic expands within the mental health system, mental health professionals (MHPs) are under increased pressure to provide more HIV-related care to clients in treatment for serious mental illness. Scientific understanding of MHPs' readiness to provide these services, however, is limited. This paper examines the distribution of HIV care experience, HIV care-related knowledge, and related attitudes among 524 MHPs employed in three CMHCs and two state psychiatric hospitals in central Indiana. The results indicate that both clinical experience and subjective readiness to provide HIV care are concentrated among a few MHPs--primarily gay, lesbian, or bisexual (g/l/b) staff--within each facility. This informal system for organizing HIV care highlights the unique contributions g/l/b staff members make both in providing direct HIV care and in making sure that HIV-related issues are addressed in mental health settings. The implications of g/l/b staff members' "gate making" function for improving the provision of HIV-related mental health services are discussed.