培美曲塞单药对比多西紫杉醇二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的系统评价

目的:比较培美曲塞单药与多西紫杉醇单药二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效和安全性。方法:采用Cochrane系统评价方法进行资料提取、分析、评价,并使用RevMan 5.0软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入5个研究,916例晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。Meta分析结果显示,与对照组多西紫杉醇相比,培美曲塞治疗晚期NSCLC的总反应率、一年生存率、疾病控制率等的差别无统计学意义,可以认为二者疗效相当。不良反应方面,培美曲塞和多西紫杉醇在轻度及重度中性粒细胞减少、重度血小板下降和轻度脱发方面的发生率方面的差异具有统计学意义。其中,在轻度及重度中性粒细胞减少和轻度脱发方面培美曲塞优于多西紫杉醇,而在重度血小板下降方面多西紫杉醇优于培美曲塞。在其他各个方面的不良反应发生率中,两组差异没有统计学意义。结论:培美曲塞单药二线治疗晚期NSCLC的疗效确切。与多西紫杉醇比较,二者疗效差异不明显,不良反应发生率存在一些差异。     

Augmenting clozapine with sertindole: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Clozapine augmentation with antipsychotic drugs is widely used despite sparse evidence supporting this strategy. Sertindole is a nonsedating atypical antipsychotic drug with low affinity for cholinergic receptors, which makes it potentially suitable for augmentation of clozapine. The study design was a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study including patients with International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision schizophrenia (F20.0-F20.3) and treated with clozapine for at least 6 months who had not achieved sufficient response. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either sertindole 16 mg or placebo, and assessment was done at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks. Assessment included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression, Udvalg for Kliniske Unders?gelser, World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief, Drug Attitude Inventory, fasting glucose, lipids, and electrocardiogram. Clozapine augmentation with sertindole was not superior to placebo regarding total score or subscale score of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression, World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief, or Drug Attitude Inventory. No increased adverse effects compared with placebo were found. Four patients randomized to sertindole experienced a significant worsening of psychosis, and 2 of them required psychiatric admission. Metabolic parameters were unchanged during the study, but augmentation of clozapine with sertindole was associated with a 12-millisecond (SD, 20-millisecond) QTc prolongation compared with 0 millisecond (SD, 20 milliseconds) in the placebo group (P < 0.03). Augmentation with sertindole showed no benefits compared with placebo. Psychiatrists should be aware that augmentation might not add any benefits for the patients and in some cases worsen psychosis.     

Elliptinium: Phase II study in advanced measurable breast cancer

Summary Eighteen patients with advanced measurable breast cancer were treated with elliptinium acetate 100 mg/m² × 3 days every 3 weeks. Fourteen of these patients had failed prior chemotherapy. Two patients had an objective tumor response of greater than 4 weeks. Myelosuppression, renal insufficiency and thrombophlebitis were rarely encountered and alopecia was not seen at all. This study demonstrates that elliptinium has minimal activity in recurrent breast cancer with a favorable toxicity profile.     

Phase II, open-label, randomized study (SIGN) of single-agent gefitinib (IRESSA) or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIb or IV) non-small-cell lung cancer

Our objective was to evaluate gefitinib (IRESSA), an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, versus docetaxel as second-line monotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SIGN (Second-line Indication of Gefitinib in NSCLC; code 1839IL/0503) was a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, phase II trial that investigated oral gefitinib (250 mg/day) or i.v. docetaxel (75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) in patients with advanced NSCLC who had previously received one chemotherapy regimen. The primary objective was assessment of symptom improvement (using the FACT-L Lung Cancer Subscale). Secondary objectives included quality of life (FACT-L total score), response rate (using RECIST), overall survival and safety. This trial recruited 141 patients (68 to gefitinib and 73 to docetaxel) who received treatment for a median duration of 3.0 (gefitinib) and 2.8 (docetaxel) months. Similar efficacy was observed with gefitinib and docetaxel, 36.8 and 26.0% symptom improvement rates, 33.8 and 26.0% quality-of-life improvement rates, 13.2 and 13.7% objective response rates, and 7.5 and 7.1 months median overall survival, respectively. Fewer drug-related adverse events were observed with gefitinib compared with docetaxel (all grades: 51.5 versus 78.9%; Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3/4: 8.8 versus 25.4%). There were no withdrawals or deaths due to drug-related adverse events with gefitinib, while three patients withdrew and three died due to adverse events in the docetaxel group that were possibly drug related. We conclude efficacy with gefitinib was similar to docetaxel, but with a more favorable tolerability profile, in the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. These results support further investigation of gefitinib in this disease setting.     

Lorazepam for chronic catatonia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study

Acute catatonic syndromes occurring in the context of various medical and neuropsychiatric conditions, including schizophrenia, have been shown to respond well to benzodiazepines (BZD). However, there have been no studies specifically designed to address the BZD treatment response of persistent catatonic states. Eighteen patients with clinically stable chronic schizophrenia, who also displayed enduring catatonic features, underwent a 12-week long, random assignment, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial with lorazepam (6 mg/day). A comprehensive assessment, including the subjects’ clinical and motor (catatonic as well as drug-induced movement disorders) condition, was performed at baseline and four weekly intervals thereafter. Pre-existing medication was kept constant throughout the study. Lorazepam had no effect on the subjects’catatonic signs and symptoms, suggesting that acute and chronic catatonic syndromes associated with schizophrenic illness might have a different neurobiological basis. Received: 25 May 1998/Final version: 22 September 1998     

Lamotrigine treatment of aggression in female borderline-patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Anger and aggression are typical in borderline patients. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of lamotrigine versus placebo in the treatment of aggression in women meeting the criteria for borderline personality disorder (BPD). We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine in 24 female subjects meeting Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) criteria for BPD. The subjects were randomly assigned in a 2: 1 manner ratio to lamotrigine (n = 18) or placebo (n = 9). Treatment duration was 8 weeks. Primary outcome measures were self-reported changes on the anger scales of the Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). In comparison with the placebo group, and according to the intention-to-treat principle, highly significant (p < 0.01) changes on four STAXI scales (State-Anger, Trait-Anger, Anger-Out, Anger-Control) were observed in those subjects treated with lamotrigine after 8 weeks. The only exception (p < 0.05) was found on the Anger-In scale, where a difference of only 8.5% (p < 0.2) was found. All the patients tolerated lamotrigine relatively well. Lamotrigine appears to be a safe and effective agent in the treatment of anger in women with criteria-defined BPD as defined by SCID criteria. It did not produce any clinically significant effect on body weight.     

Mirtazapine treatment of social phobia in women: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Social phobia is an anxiety disorder characterized by extreme fear and phobic avoidance of social and performance situations and by a relatively poor health-related quality of life. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of mirtazapine versus placebo in the treatment of patients with social phobia. In 2004, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of mirtazapine in 66 female subjects from the general population meeting the criteria for social phobia. The subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1 manner to mirtazapine (n = 33) or placebo (n = 33). The treatment lasted 10 weeks. Seven patients dropped out. Primary outcome measures were self-reported changes on the Social Phobia Inventory, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, and Health Survey (SF-36). In comparison with the placebo group and according to the intent-to-treat principle, significant differences on the Social Phobia Inventory and Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale scales (all P < 0.001), as well as on most (5 from 8) scales of SF-36 (all P < 0.001), were observed in the mirtazapine-treated subjects. All patients tolerated mirtazapine relatively well. Mirtazapine appears to be an effective agent in the treatment of social phobia in women and in the improvement of their health-related quality of life.     

Phase II study of docetaxel and epirubicin in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer

The efficacy and safety of docetaxel-epirubicin chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer was investigated in Chinese women. Three-weekly cycles comprised epirubicin 75 mg/m2 i.v. followed 1 h later by docetaxel 75 mg/m2 i.v. After 3 cycles, responding patients received a further 3 cycles, followed by 3 cycles of docetaxel alone. Forty-six patients entered the study, of whom 37% had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Three patients withdrew due to toxicity and were not evaluable for response. There were five complete responses and 31 partial responses, giving an overall response rate of 83.7% (95% CI 72.7-94.8%). The median time to progression was 10.96 months (95% CI 7.76-12.86) and median survival was 24.2 months (95% CI 16.6-). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (96% of patients) and neutropenia with fever (39%). Hepatotoxicity occurred in six patients, two being attributable to hepatitis B virus reactivation. No patients suffered grade 3/4 cardiac toxicity and there were no treatment-related mortalities. Quality of life aspects deteriorated after 3 cycles, but there was a trend towards improved emotional aspects after 9 cycles. We conclude that docetaxel-epirubicin chemotherapy is highly effective for recurrent metastatic/locoregional breast cancer, with myelosuppression being the main toxicity.     

Efficacy and safety of fentanyl sublingual spray for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: a randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled study

Abstract

Background and objectives:

A number of transmucosal fentanyl formulations have been developed for the management of breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP). Sublingual delivery of fentanyl, formulated as fentanyl sublingual spray, offers the potential for more rapid and greater absorption of fentanyl and associated onset of analgesic effect compared with other formulations. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of fentanyl sublingual spray for the treatment of BTCP.     

Bupropion in the treatment of pathological gambling: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study

We tested the efficacy of bupropion in the treatment of persons with pathological gambling (PG). Nondepressed, healthy subjects with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition PG were randomly assigned to placebo or flexibly dosed bupropion in a 12-week double-blind trial. Outcome measures included the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale modified for PG, the Gambling Severity Assessment Scale, the Clinical Global Impression Improvement and Severity Scales, the Global Assessment Scale, the Timeline Follow Back, the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, and the Sheehan Disability Scale. Thirty-nine subjects (28 men, 11 women) were randomized to bupropion (n = 18) or placebo (n = 21). The 2 groups were similar on demographic and clinical measures. There were few differences between the treatment groups on any primary or secondary outcome measure, although subjects in each cell experienced significant improvement. Of subjects with at least 1 postrandomization visit, 35.7% of bupropion and 47.1% of placebo recipients experienced "much" or "very much" improvement on the Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale. The trial was complicated by a high noncompletion rate (43.6%). Bupropion was well tolerated. Bupropion and placebo recipients did equally well in a short-term trial, with improvement seen as early as the first week of treatment. The high placebo response rate and the high noncompletion rate each reflect the challenge inherent in treating persons with PG.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer

In this phase II study, the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine were studied in 42 patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received up to one prior chemotherapy regimen in an adjuvant setting. Ten patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-eight patients (67%) had visceral disease spread at entry. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The mean number of completed cycles was 3.9 and the mean dose delivered was 942.2 mg/m2. Ninety-seven percent of injections were administered as assigned. No complete responses were observed, but there were six partial responses and 24 patients with stable disease lasting 2-9 months. The overall response rate was 14.3% (95% CI 5.4-28.5%). The median survival for all patients was 15.2 months. Maximum WHO grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed in five patients for nausea and vomiting, one patient for diarrhea, one patient for pain, seven patients for alanine transaminase, and eight patients for segmented neutrophils. There were no grade 3 and 4 toxicities for alopecia. These data confirm modest single-agent gemcitabine activity in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Gemcitabine's favorable toxicity profile makes it an ideal candidate for combination chemotherapy.     

Dronabinol for the treatment of cannabis dependence: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Cannabis dependence is a substantial public health problem. Behavioral treatments have shown promise, but there are no effective medications for cannabis dependence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of dronabinol, a synthetic form of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, a naturally occurring pharmacologically active component of marijuana, in treating cannabis dependence. 156 cannabis-dependent adults were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week trial. After a 1-week placebo lead-in phase, participants were randomized to receive dronabinol 20mg twice a day or placebo. Doses were maintained until the end of week 8 and then tapered off over 2 weeks. All participants received weekly motivational enhancement and relapse prevention therapy. Marijuana use was assessed using the timeline follow back method. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in the proportion of participants who achieved 2 weeks of abstinence at the end of the maintenance phase (dronabinol: 17.7%; placebo: 15.6%). Although both groups showed a reduction in marijuana use over time, there were no differences between the groups. Treatment retention was significantly higher at the end of the maintenance phase on dronabinol (77%), compared to placebo (61%) (P=.02), and withdrawal symptoms were significantly lower on dronabinol than placebo (P=.02). This is the first trial using an agonist substitution strategy for treatment of cannabis dependence. Dronabinol showed promise, it was well-tolerated, and improved treatment retention and withdrawal symptoms. Future trials might test higher doses, combinations of dronabinol with other medications with complementary mechanisms, or with more potent behavioral interventions.     

Celecoxib as adjunctive treatment to risperidone in children with autistic disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Rational

Autism is associated with activation of the inflammatory response system.

Objective

This study aims to assess the efficacy of a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of autism

Methods

In a 10-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, 40 outpatient children with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision clinical diagnosis of autism were randomly allocated to celecoxib plus risperidone or placebo plus risperidone. The dose of risperidone and celecoxib were titrated up to 3 and 300 mg/day, respectively. Patients were assessed at baseline and after 2, 4, 6, and 10 weeks of starting medication using the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community (ABC-C) Rating Scale. Primary outcome measure was the change in irritability subscale of ABC-C.

Results

Significant time?×?treatment interaction was observed for Irritability (F (1.658, 63.021)?=?13.580, P?<?0.001), Lethargy/Social Withdrawal (F (1.948, 74.032)?=?16.811, P?<?0.001), and Stereotypic Behavior (F(1.742, 66.198)?=?12.104, P?<?0.001), but not for Hyperactivity/Noncompliance (F (2.564, 97.424)?=?1.469, P?=?0.232), and Inappropriate Speech subscales (F (1.607, 61.075)?=?0.173, P?=?0.794). By week 10, patients in the celecoxib group showed significantly greater improvement in the Irritability (P?<?0.001), Lethargy/Social Withdrawal (P?<?0.001), and Stereotypic Behavior (P?<?0.00) but not in Hyperactivity/Noncompliance (P?=?0.202) and Inappropriate Speech (P?=?0.802) subscales than the placebo group. Complete response was achieved by four (20 %) patients in the placebo group and 11 (55 %) patients in the celecoxib group (χ ² (1)?=?5.227, P?=?0.022). Frequency of side effects was similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

Combination of risperidone and celecoxib was superior to risperidone alone in treating irritability, social withdrawal, and stereotypy of children with autism. (Registration, www.irct.ir; IRCT138711091556N2)     

Phase II study of second-line oxaliplatin, irinotecan and mitomycin C in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer

The aim of this phase II study was to investigate the therapeutic value of second-line treatment with oxaliplatin, irinotecan (CPT-11) and mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer pretreated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. A total of 10 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, all of whom had developed progressive disease from advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer while receiving or within 6 months after discontinuing first-line chemotherapy with 5-FU and leucovorin, were entered in this study. At the time of relapse, cytotoxic chemotherapy consisting of oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2 plus CPT-11 80 mg/m2 given i.v. on therapeutic day 1, and MMC 6 mg/ m2 given i.v. on day 15, respectively, was initiated. Treatment courses were repeated every 4 weeks for a total of six courses unless there was prior evidence of progressive disease. The overall response rate was 30% with three partial responses for all 10 assessable patients. Two additional patients (20%) had stable disease and five patients (50%) progressed. The median overall survival duration has not been reached yet and is longer than 7.1 months (range 2-23.5+) from the beginning of second-line therapy. Four patients are currently alive with progressive disease. The tolerance of second-line treatment was generally mild to moderate and easy to treat. Our data suggest that the combination of oxaliplatin, CPT-11 and MMC in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer pretreated with 5-FU-based chemotherapy is feasible and has substantial antitumor activity. Further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted.