Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and microinvasion

Aim: Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISMI) is characterized by one or more areas of focal invasion, 1 mm or less in diameter. While pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) does not have the potential to metastasize to regional nodes, the presence of microinvasion makes lymph node metastasis possible, leading to current guidelines recommending staging of the axilla with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). However, there are few studies looking at the risk of lymphatic spread in patients with DCISMI, and indications for axillary staging in such cases is controversial. The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of nodal metastasis in patients with DCISMI in order to help ascertain whether SLNB can be safely avoided in DCISMI. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients undergoing surgery for DCIS over a 2‐year period (April 2006–08). Data were collected from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme database and patient case notes. Patients having a SLNB had injection of radioisotope and blue dye. All SLNB were evaluated with serial sectioning and haematoxylin–eosin staining. Results: Over the 2‐year period, 399 screen‐detected breast cancers were treated, of which 310 (77 per cent) were invasive, 17 (4 per cent) had DCISMI and 72 (19 per cent) pure DCIS. The group with DCISMI was studied in more detail. Twelve out of the 17 patients had a wide local excision and five had a mastectomy. All 17 patients with DCISMI had a SLNB. No positive lymph nodes were found in this group. Conclusion: Our data suggest that the risk of nodal metastasis in DCISMI might be low, and question the role of SLNB in DCISMI. We highlight the lack of data on DCISMI and risk of nodal metastasis, and the need for further investigation.     

Sentinel lymph node positivity of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ or microinvasive breast cancer

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the rates of sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity in patients with a final diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or microinvasive breast cancer (MIC). METHODS: One hundred thirty patients underwent SLN mapping from 1998 to 2003 for DCIS or MIC. RESULTS: One hundred nine patients with DCIS and 21 with MIC underwent SLN mapping. One patient with bilateral DCIS underwent 2 SLN procedures; therefore, the results of 131 SLN procedures are included. On hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, 4 of 110 patients (3.6%) with DCIS had positive SLNs. Four additional patients had positive SLNs by IHC staining only (3.6%). Two of 8 patients underwent completion axillary dissection, and neither had additional involved nodes on completion axillary dissection. One of the 21 patients with MIC had positive SLNs by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) (4.8%), and another had an involved SLN by IHC staining (4.8%). The patient with the positive SLN by H&E had 1 additional node on completion axillary dissection. CONCLUSION: Rates of SLN positivity for patients with DCIS are modest, even in a high-risk population, and there is continuing uncertainty about its clinical importance.     

Sentinel node procedure is warranted in ductal carcinoma in situ with high risk of occult invasive carcinoma and microinvasive carcinoma treated by mastectomy

Abstract:  Axillary lymph node dissection in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is not warranted because DCIS has no metastatic potential. However, the risk of microinvasive carcinoma (MIC) exists in large DCIS treated by mastectomy. The aim of this series is to evaluate the incidence of lymph node metastases in DCIS and DCIS-MIC. We analyzed retrospectively patients treated in six French cancer centers for pure DCIS or DCIS-MIC. Surgical procedures were lumpectomy or mastectomy associated with an axillary sentinel node (SN) procedure. We included 161 patients suffering from pure DCIS (116/161, 72%) or DCIS-MIC (45/161, 28%). Mean age was 56 years (32–78). We observed underestimation between core biopsy and histological result in 43/142 cases (30%). These data show an association between lesion size, solid subtype, high-grade DCIS, and underestimation. Forty-eight breast conservative procedures were performed and 113 mastectomies (70%). SN procedure was performed using blue dye, technetium, or both. In our series, we selected patients with a high risk of occult invasive carcinoma: high grade (55%), mean size (27 mm), and mastectomy (112). Six SN were found positive (3.7%). In the five patients treated with complete axillary dissection, the SN was the only positive node. SN in DCIS is an interesting procedure but not necessary for all patients. We need to focus on the subgroup with or a high risk of occult MIC: extensive calcifications or palpable mass, DCIS diagnosed by core biopsy and underestimation, multifocality, high grade, large tumor size, MIC, and mastectomy.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ: an evolving approach at the University of Florida

While sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has virtually replaced axillary dissection as the initial diagnostic procedure for invasive breast cancer, the role of SLNB in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with SLNB in DCIS. All patients with DCIS or DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) who underwent SLNB from June 1997 to April 2002 at the University of Florida were included for analysis. The indications for SLNB were at the discretion of the treating surgeon. Lymphatic mapping involved a sequential dermal-peritumoral radiocolloid injection and dynamic lymphoscintigraphy followed by an intraoperative assessment of radioactivity with a handheld gamma probe. All sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) with radioactive counts>or=10% of the ex vivo counts of the most radioactive SLN were removed. Pathologic analysis consisted of slicing the SLN at 2 mm intervals for permanent section. All paraffin blocks of the SLNs were step sectioned in 4 microm sections (92 microm spacing) through the entire lymph node. Slides were then stained with an immunohistochemical stain for cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) and evaluated by microscopy. Nodal metastases were classified using the 6th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual. From April 1998 to April 2002, 43 patients with DCIS underwent SLNB at the University of Florida. Seven patients (16%) with multifocal or extensive DCIS (five patients) or DCISM (two patients) who underwent SLNB had a positive sentinel node. Two of the three patients considered positive by immunohistochemistry alone had either DCISM or invasive disease. Four (80%) of the five patients with extensive DCIS and a positive sentinel node were ultimately determined to have invasive or microinvasive disease. While SLNB remains controversial in DCIS, our data suggest that patients with extensive DCIS should undergo SLNB at the initial procedure to avoid the need for a second operation. Data from clinical trials are needed to determine the impact of SLNB results on overall survival in patients with DCIS.     

Value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast ductal carcinoma in situ upstaged to invasive carcinoma

Abstract:  The role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with initial diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is still a dilemma. Different studies are trying to define predicting factors of invasive cancer in DCIS. The aim of this study was to confirm the value of SLN biopsy in DCIS because of the invasive upstaging risk on final histology. Patients with initial diagnosis of DCIS and with axillary SLN biopsy were selected. All diagnoses were confirmed by biopsy of mammographic lesions. Surgical treatment was lumpectomy or mastectomy associated with SLN biopsy. Imprint stains were performed, and then serial sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and with immunohistochemistry (IHC). A complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed during the same surgery when a node metastasis was found. Eighty patients were enrolled in the study. Of the 61 patients who were initially diagnosed with DCIS, 12 (20%) were upstaged to microinvasive or invasive carcinoma and 9 (15%) had a metastatic SLN. Patients upstaged to invasive carcinoma had macrometastatic SLN immediately fed by a complete ALND. SLN micrometastases and isolated cells were detected by IHC and secondary complete ALND found an additional metastatic lymph node in one patient. Tumor size larger than 30 mm and mastectomy were the only significative predicting factors of upstaged disease (p < 0.0001) in our study. In patients with initial diagnosis of large DCIS programmed for mastectomy, SLN biopsy should be discussed in order to detect underlying invasive disease and to spare patients a second operating time.     

Predictors of invasion and axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: an analysis of 255 cases

The diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) using core biopsy does not ensure the absence of invasion on final excision. We performed a retrospective analysis of 255 patients with DCIS who had subsequent excision. Clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings were correlated with risk of invasion and sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis. Of 255 patients with DCIS, 199 had definitive surgery and 52 (26%) had invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) on final excision. Extent of abnormal microcalcification on mammography, and presence of a radiologic/palpable mass and solid type of DCIS were significantly associated with invasion on final excision. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 131 (65.8%) patients of whom 18 (13.4%) had metastasis. Size of IDC and extent of DCIS on final pathology were significantly associated with positive SLN. Micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells comprised majority (71.4%) of the metastases in DCIS. SLN biopsy should be considered in those with high risk DCIS.     

胃癌前哨淋巴结研究进展

前哨淋巴结是从原发肿瘤淋巴引流途中首先可能发生转移的部位。Cabana在阴茎癌中提出前哨淋巴结的概念后,前哨淋巴结活检技术不断在多种肿瘤中广泛应用。目前,该技术已成功用于黑色素瘤、乳腺癌等手术。但在胃癌中,由于胃淋巴引流复杂、存在跳跃转移以及假阴性率较高,前哨淋巴结活检技术应用于临床还为时过早,其可行性和适用性尚无定论。因此,前哨淋巴结活检技术应用于胃癌,还有许多问题需要回答。     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in juvenile secretory carcinoma

A 9-year-old girl presented with a 3-year history of a right breast mass. Excisional biopsy showed a secretory carcinoma. A treatment plan of simple mastectomy and axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy was chosen. She remains free of disease at 3-year follow-up. Sentinel lymph node biopsy offers an approach to stage the axillary lymphatic basin with a lower complication rate than formal dissection. The authors advocate its use in the treatment of pediatric breast cancer.     

Axillary lymph node metastases in patients with a final diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ

BACKGROUND: Recent studies report the incidence of axillary metastases in patients with ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) approaches 13%. The purpose of this study was to define the incidence of axillary micrometastases in patients with pure DCIS before and after the introduction of sentinel lymph node biopsy. METHODS: Patients with a final diagnosis of DCIS form the basis of this study. Data were entered prospectively into an Institutional Review Board approved Oracle database from January 1997 through July 2002. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-four patients had lymph nodes evaluated. Ninety-eight percent of patients had no evidence of metastatic disease and 2% were found to have micrometastases. This was consistent in those who had level I or II lymph node sampling or both and those who had lymphatic mapping and a sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure. CONCLUSIONS: These data do not support axillary lymph node removal of any type in patients with pure DCIS.     

Indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer when core biopsy shows ductal carcinoma in situ

Background

The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is controversial.

Methods

A total of 103 primary breast cancer patients who were diagnosed with DCIS by needle biopsy preoperatively and underwent initial SLNB were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

No sentinel nodal metastasis was detected in 66 patients with the final diagnosis of DCIS. However, 2 (5.4%) of 37 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma at final diagnosis had positive sentinel nodes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified 2 independent significant predictors of existence of invasive components: presence of a palpable tumor (odds ratio, 4.091; 95% confidential interval, 1.399–11.959; P = .010) and tumor size of 2.0 cm or larger on magnetic resonance imaging (odds ratio, 4.506; 95% confidence interval, 1.322–15.358; P = .016).

Conclusions

Initial SLNB should be considered for patients diagnosed with DCIS by needle biopsy when they have a high risk for harboring invasive ductal cancer preoperatively.     

Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ patients

BACKGROUND: The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is poorly defined. However, up to 20% of patients with DCIS will have invasive carcinoma; these patients require staging for axillary metastasis. The aim of this study was to identify patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of DCIS who may benefit from SLNB. METHODS: In a prospective study, we performed SLNB on patients with a preoperative diagnosis of >2.5 cm of high-grade DCIS or DCIS when mastectomy was indicated. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients underwent surgery for high-grade DCIS, and 35 of these patients underwent SLNB. Postsurgical excision histology revealed invasive disease in 20 patients, 19 of whom had undergone SLNB. Before the adoption of SLNB in selected DCIS patients, all 20 with occult invasive disease would have required second surgery axillary staging (P < .01, chi-square test). CONCLUSIONS: SLNB should not be performed routinely for all patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS. However, selective lymphadenectomy may be a useful clinical adjuvant in selected high-risk DCIS patients.     

Predictors of residual invasive disease after core needle biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ

Core needle biopsy (CNB) is used to sample both mammographically and ultrasound detected breast lesions. A diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) by CNB does not ensure the absence of invasive cancer upon surgical excision and as a result an upstaged patient may need to undergo additional surgery for axillary nodal evaluation. This study evaluates the accuracy of CNB in excluding invasive disease and the preoperative features that predict upstaging of DCIS to invasive breast cancer. Two hundred fifty-four patients over an 8-year period from 1994 to 2002 with a diagnosis of DCIS alone by CNB were retrospectively reviewed. Underestimation of invasive cancer by CNB was determined. Radiographic, pathologic, and surgical features of the cohort were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. The mean age was 55 years (range 27-84) and mean follow-up was 25 months with one patient unavailable for follow-up. There were a total of six patient deaths, all of which were not disease-specific. A total of 21 out of 254 patients (8%) with DCIS by CNB were upstaged to invasive cancer following surgical excision. There was a significant inverse relationship between the number of core biopsies and the incidence of upstaging (p < 0.006) in that patients with fewer core samples were more likely to be upstaged at surgical pathology. No relationship was noted between the size of the core samples and the likelihood of upstaging (p > 0.4). Of 21 patients with invasion, all but two had comedonecrosis by CNB. Comedonecrosis by CNB significantly increased the likelihood of upstaging (p < 0.001). Of the 21 patients who were upstaged, 12 required subsequent surgery for nodal evaluation while nine had sentinel node biopsy at initial operation. Finally, upstaged patients were significantly more likely to have a positive margin (p < 0.008). Ductal carcinoma in situ with comedonecrosis on CNB can help to predict the possibility of invasion. Increasing the number of core biopsies reduced the likelihood of sampling error.     

An update of sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study is to further clarify the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients that are upstaged upon final pathology and/or have metastatic disease in the axilla. METHODS: All patients were diagnosed with DCIS or DCIS with microinvasion (DCISm) on their diagnostic biopsy and received a sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy between 1994 and 2004. Six hundred seventy-five patients were divided into 613 patients with DCIS and 62 patients with DCISm. RESULTS: Sixty-six of 675 (10%) were upstaged to invasive cancer. Fifty-five of 613 (9%) patients with DCIS were upstaged, whereas 11 of 62 (18%) patients with DCISm were upstaged. Forty-nine of 675 (7%) patients had +SLN. Twenty-two of 49 (45%) patients with +SLN had invasive carcinoma or DCISm on final histology. CONCLUSIONS: After review of histology, grade, type of biopsy, and mammographic findings, the combined findings of high grade, mass by mammography, and microinvasion predict patients at higher risk for invasive carcinoma. Selective utilization of SLN biopsy in DCIS is recommended.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal

Background: The current Trans‐Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) protocol for T1 and T2 anal cancers is combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy excluding the inguinal region from the field. Several centres worldwide irradiate both inguinal regions as there is a small incidence of involvement with early stage tumours. The presence of inguinal lymph node metastases is not accurately detected using clinical and most radiological assessment modalities. We have developed a method of sampling the sentinel node in the groin using established node mapping techniques. Methods: A combination of radio‐labelled Antimony Sulphide and Patent Blue dye injected around the anal cancer enable identification of the sentinel node in the groin, using a gamma probe and direct visualization of the blue node. Results: This technique has been used in four patients. A groin sentinel node was identified and removed in three of these, with pathological assessment excluding metastatic disease in the inguinal region. The fourth patient had a sentinel node mapped to a meso‐rectal node. This was not sampled. Conclusions: The application of this effective technique will allow accurate staging of anal cancers to better plan future treatment regimes.     

Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy for oral squamous cell carcinoma: Current evidence and future challenges

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been used across oncological specialties for prognostication, staging, and identification of occult nodal metastasis. Recent studies demonstrated the potential clinical utility of SLNB in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). Elective neck dissection is the current standard of care in early management of OCSCC with depth of invasion greater than 2–4 mm; however, majority of patients ultimately do not have nodal disease on final pathology. SLNB is an alternative procedure widely adopted in early cancer management in many oncological subspecialities. Several considerations such as depth of invasion, nodal mapping, histopathology methods, operator variability, postoperative complications, and advancement in preoperative and intraoperative imaging technology can guide the appropriate application to SLNB in OCSCC. The aim of this review is to discuss the current evidence for SLNB in the treatment of early stage OCSCC, imaging technologies that support SLNB procedures, and studies that are currently underway.     

Infiltrating ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ associated with mammary hamartoma

Mammary hamartoma is a rare nonmalignant lesion. Only 11 cases of carcinoma associated with hamartoma have been previously described in the literature. We describe a case of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) associated with hamartoma in a 35-year-old woman. Mammography showed the features of a typical hamartoma with suspicious microcalcifications arising in it. The patient underwent a radical modified mastectomy. It is likely that hamartoma is a coincidental finding. The identification of suspicious microcalcifications in a typical mammographic image of a hamartoma should prompt continued examination to exclude an underlying tumor.     

Microinvasive breast cancer and the role of sentinel node biopsy: an institutional experience and review of the literature

Abstract:  Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCISM) is a distinct clinicopathologic entity. Its true metastatic potential has been unclear, due in part to historical differences in the definition of microinvasion. The role of routine axillary staging for DCISM is controversial, given the reportedly low incidence of axillary metastases. We describe our institutional experience with DCISM, and define the role of axillary staging. A retrospective analysis was made of patients with DCISM. Forty-four patients underwent axillary staging (24 axillary lymph node dissection [ALND], 22 sentinel node biopsy [SNB]). Macrometastatic disease was present in three patients (7%), and two patients had isolated tumor cells (itc) in the sentinel node. Patients with axillary metastases tended to be younger. Comedonecrosis, nuclear grade, multifocal microinvasion or presentation as a clinical mass was not associated with a higher rate of axillary metastases. In this series, 7% of patients had macrometastatic disease, and two patients (5%) had itc only. Axillary staging is indicated, and SNB is appropriate for the identification of axillary metastatic disease.