Immunological evaluation of peptide vaccination for cancer patients with the HLA‐A26 allele

To develop a peptide vaccine for cancer patients with the HLA‐A26 allele, which is a minor population worldwide, we investigated the immunological responses of HLA‐A26⁺/A26⁺ cancer patients to four different CTL epitope peptides under personalized peptide vaccine regimens. In personalized peptide vaccine regimens, two to four peptides showing positive peptide‐specific IgG responses in pre‐vaccination plasma were selected from the four peptide candidates applicable for HLA‐A26⁺/A26⁺ cancer patients and administered s.c. Peptide‐specific CTL and IgG responses along with cytokine levels were measured before and after vaccination. Cell surface markers in PBMCs and plasma cytokine levels were also measured. In this study, 21 advanced cancer patients, including seven lung, three breast, two pancreas, and two colon cancer patients, were enrolled. Their HLA‐A26 genotypes were HLA‐A26:01 (n = 24), HLA‐A26:03 (n = 10), and HLA‐A26:02 (n = 8). One, 14, and 6 patients received two, three, and four peptides, respectively. Grade 1 or 2 skin reactions at the injection sites were observed in the majority of patients, but no severe adverse events related to the vaccination were observed. Peptide‐specific CTL responses were augmented in 39% or 22% of patients after one or two cycles of vaccination, respectively. Notably, peptide‐specific IgG were augmented in 63% or 100% of patients after one or two cycles of vaccination, respectively. Personalized peptide vaccines with these four CTL epitope peptides could be feasible for HLA‐A26⁺ advanced cancer patients because of their safety and higher rates of immunological responses.     

Personalized peptide vaccination for cervical cancer patients who have received prior platinum‐based chemotherapy

A feasibility study was performed to evaluate the immunological efficacy and safety of a personalized peptide vaccine (PPV) for cervical cancer patients who have received platinum‐based chemotherapy. A total of 24 patients with standard chemotherapy‐resistant cervical cancer, including 18 recurrent cases, were enrolled in this study and received a maximum of 4 peptides based on HLA‐A types and IgG levels to the vaccine candidate peptides in pre‐vaccination plasma. The parental protein expression of most of the vaccine peptides was confirmed in the cervical cancer tissues. No vaccine‐related systemic grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed in any patients. Due to disease progression, 2 patients failed to complete the first cycle of vaccinations (sixth vaccination). Cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte (CTL) or IgG responses specific for the peptides used for vaccination were augmented in half of cases after the first cycle. The median overall survival was 8.3 months. The clinical responses of the evaluable 18 cases consisted of 1 case with a partial response and 17 cases with disease progression; the remaining 6 cases were not evaluable. Performance status, injection site skin reaction and circulating PD‐1⁺CD4⁺ T‐cells were significantly prognostic of overall survival, and multivariate analysis also indicated that the performance status and circulating PD‐1⁺CD4⁺ T‐cells were prognostic. Because of the safety and immunological efficacy of PPV and the possible prolongation of overall survival, further clinical trials of PPV at a larger scale in advanced or recurrent cervical cancer patients who have received prior platinum‐based chemotherapy are recommended.     

Efficacy of the NCCV Cocktail‐1 vaccine for refractory pediatric solid tumors: A phase I clinical trial

Pediatric refractory solid tumors are aggressive malignant diseases, resulting in an extremely poor prognosis. KOC1, FOXM1, and KIF20A are cancer antigens that could be ideal targets for anticancer immunotherapy against pediatric refractory solid tumors with positive expression for these antigens. This nonrandomized, open‐label, phase I clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of the NCCV Cocktail‐1 vaccine, which is a cocktail of cancer peptides derived from KOC1, FOXM1, and KIF20A, in patients with pediatric refractory solid tumors. Twelve patients with refractory pediatric solid tumors underwent NCCV Cocktail‐1 vaccination weekly by intradermal injections. The primary endpoint was the safety of the NCCV Cocktail‐1 vaccination, and the secondary endpoints were the immune response, as measured by interferon‐r enzyme‐linked immunospot assay, and the clinical outcomes including tumor response and progression‐free survival. The NCCV Cocktail‐1 vaccine was well tolerated. The clinical response of this trial showed that 4 patients had stable disease after 8 weeks and 2 patients maintained remission for >11 months. In 4, 8, and 5 patients, the NCCV Cocktail‐1 vaccine induced the sufficient number of peptide‐specific CTLs for KOC1, FOXM1, and KIF20A, respectively. Patients with high peptide‐specific CTL frequencies for KOC1, FOXM1, and KIF20A had better progression‐free survival than those with low frequencies. The findings of this clinical trial showed that the NCCV Cocktail‐1 vaccine could be a novel therapeutic strategy, with adequate effects against pediatric refractory solid tumors. Future large‐scale trials should evaluate the efficacy of the NCCV Cocktail‐1 vaccination.     

Phase I study of a new cancer vaccine of ten mixed peptides for advanced cancer patients

A phase I study of a new cancer vaccine (KRM‐10), consisting of a mixture of 10 different short peptides, was conducted for patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers. Primary or secondary endpoints included the dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT), or safety and immune responses, respectively. Peptide‐specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) and immunoglobulin G (IgG), together with soluble inflammatory factors, were measured before and after vaccination. Twenty‐one patients were vaccinated with KRM‐10 at dose levels of 10 (n = 6), 20 (n = 8) or 30 mg (n = 7) of peptides every week for 6 weeks. No DLT were observed in the dose range evaluated. Common treatment‐related adverse events were a grade 1 injection site reaction in 15 patients, and fever in three patients (grade 1 in two patients and grade 2 in one patient). CTL activity to at least one peptide at the time of the third and sixth vaccination increased in 2 and 3 of 6 (10 mg), 2 of 8 and 4 of 6 (20 mg), or 2 and 1 of 6 (30 mg) patients, respectively. IgG levels, at the third and sixth vaccination, were also increased in 1 and 1 of 6 (10 mg), 2 of 8 and 4 of 6 (20 mg), or 1 and 3 of 6 (30 mg) patients, respectively. The KRM‐10 vaccine consisting of 20 mg of peptides was determined as the optimal dose for a coming phase II trial because of its safety, and also for demonstrating the most potent activity for augmenting the immune response of the three doses tested. This trial was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000008820.     

Phase II clinical trial of peptide cocktail therapy for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: VENUS‐PC study

We previously conducted a phase I clinical trial combining the HLA‐A*2402‐restricted KIF20A‐derived peptide vaccine with gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) and confirmed its safety and immunogenicity in cancer patients. In this study, we conducted a multicenter, single‐armed, phase II trial using two antiangiogenic cancer vaccines targeting VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 in addition to the KIF20A peptide. We attempted to evaluate the clinical benefit of the cancer vaccination in combination with gemcitabine. Chemotherapy naïve PC patients were enrolled to evaluate primarily the 1‐year survival rate, and secondarily overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR) and the peptide‐specific immune responses. All enrolled patients received therapy without the HLA‐A information, and the HLA genotypes were used for classification of the patients. Between June 2012 and May 2013, a total of 68 patients were enrolled. No severe systemic adverse effects of Grade 3 or higher related to these three peptides were observed. The 1‐year survival rates between the HLA‐A*2402‐matched and ‐unmatched groups were not significantly different. In the HLA‐A*2402 matched group, patients showing peptide‐specific CTL induction for KIF20A or VEGFR1 showed a better prognosis compared to those without such induction (P = 0.023, P = 0.009, respectively). In the HLA‐A*2402‐matched group, the patients who showed a strong injection site reaction had a better survival rate (P = 0.017) compared to those with a weak or no injection site reaction. This phase II study demonstrated that this therapeutic peptide cocktail might be effective in patients who demonstrate peptide‐specific immune reactions although predictive biomarkers are needed for patient selection in its further clinical application.     

Immunological evaluation of peptide vaccination for cancer patients with the HLA ‐A11+ or ‐A33+ allele

The HLA‐A11 or ‐A33 allele is found in approximately 18% or 10% of the Asian population, respectively, but each of which is a minor allele worldwide, and therefore no clinical trials were previously conducted. To develop a therapeutic peptide vaccine for each of them, we investigated immunological responses of advanced cancer patients with the HLA‐A11⁺/A11⁺ (n = 18) or ‐A33⁺/A33⁺ (n = 13) allele to personalized peptide vaccine (PPV) regimens. The primary sites of HLA‐A11+/A11+ or ‐A33+/A33+ patients were the colon (n = 4 or 2), stomach (2 or 3), breast (3 or 2), lung and pancreas (2 or 2), and so on. For PPV, a maximum of four peptides were selected from nine different peptides capable of binding to HLA‐A11 and ‐A33 molecules based on the pre‐existing peptide‐specific IgG responses. There were no severe adverse events related to PPV. At the end of the first cycle, peptide‐specific CTL responses were augmented in 4/12 or 2/9 of HLA‐A11⁺/A11⁺ or ‐A33⁺/A33⁺ patients, while peptide‐specific IgG responses were augmented in 6/14 or 4/10 patients, respectively. Clinical responses consisted of four stable diseases and 14 progressive diseases in HLA‐A11⁺/A11⁺patients, versus seven and six in ‐A33⁺/A33⁺patients, respectively. Further clinical study of PPV could be recommended because of the safety and positive immunological responses.     

CD4/CD8 ratio is a prognostic factor in IgG nonresponders among peptide vaccine‐treated ovarian cancer patients

The identification of useful biomarkers is an urgent issue in cancer treatment, particularly for immunotherapy, as only some patients experience benefits from this treatment. The early induction of the IgG response has been reported as a useful biomarker of favorable prognosis for cancer patients treated with a personalized peptide vaccination, but a portion of these patients (IgG nonresponders) fail to achieve an early induction of IgG response yet experience long‐term survival. It is thus necessary to identify other biomarkers of favorable prognosis among these patients. Here we report the usefulness of classical T‐cell markers (ie, the CD8 content and the CD4/CD8 ratio in peripheral blood) in IgG nonresponders among advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with a personalized peptide vaccination. Among IgG nonresponders (n = 25), the overall survival (OS) of the increased‐CD8 group (n = 7) was significantly longer than that of the decreased‐CD8 group (n = 18; P = .018), and the OS of the patients with a decreased CD4/CD8 ratio (n = 10) was significantly longer than that of the patients with an increased ratio (n = 15; P = .0055). Thus, an increased content of CD8 and a decreased CD4/CD8 ratio are each favorable prognosis markers in IgG nonresponders treated with a personalized peptide vaccination.     

Personalized peptide vaccination as second‐line treatment for metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma

This study investigated the applicability of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer (mUTUC) after failure of platinum‐based chemotherapy. In this single arm, open‐label, phase II clinical trial, patients with mUTUC received PPV at a single institution. Personalized peptide vaccination treatment used a maximum of four peptides chosen from 27 candidate peptides according to human leukocyte antigen types and peptide‐reactive IgG titers, for six s.c. injections weekly as one cycle. The safety of PPV, as well as its influence on host immunity and effect on overall survival were assessed. Forty‐eight patients were enrolled in this study. Personalized peptide vaccinations were well tolerated without severe adverse events. Median survival time was 7.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3–13.1) with 13.0 months for patients receiving combined salvage chemotherapy (95% CI, 5.7–17.5) and 4.5 months for patients receiving PPV alone (95% CI, 1.7–10.1) (P = 0.080). Patients with positive CTL responses showed a significantly longer survival than patients with negative CTL responses (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16–0.85; P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that lower numbers of Bellmunt risk factors and lower levels of B‐cell activating factor were significantly associated with favorable overall survival for patients under PPV treatment. This study indicated that PPV for patients with mUTUC after failure of platinum‐based chemotherapy induced substantial peptide‐specific CTL responses without severe adverse events and has the potential to prolong survival when combined with salvage chemotherapy. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ID: 000001854.     

Refractory diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma after first‐line immuno‐CT: Treatment options and outcomes

In the rituximab era, one‐third of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients experience relapse/refractory disease after first‐line anthracycline‐based immunochemotherapy. Optimal management remains an unmet medical need. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of a cohort of refractory patients according to their patterns of refractoriness and the type of salvage option. We performed a retrospective analysis, which included 104 diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma patients treated at Lyon Sud University Hospital (2002‐2017) who presented with refractory disease. Refractoriness was defined as progressive/stable disease during first‐line treatment (primary refractory, N = 47), a partial response after the end of first‐line treatment that required subsequent treatment (residual disease, N = 19), or relapse within 1 year of diagnosis after an initial complete response (CR) (early relapse, N = 38). The 2‐year overall survival (OS) rates for primary refractory, early relapse, and residual disease patients were 27%, 25%, and 52%, respectively, while the event‐free survival rates for those groups were 13%, 13%, and 42%, respectively. In a univariate analysis, lactate dehydrogenase level, Ann Arbor stage, poor performance status, high age‐adjusted International Prognostic Index score, and age > 65 years were associated with shorter OS. The use of rituximab and platinum‐based chemo during the first salvage treatment was associated with prolonged OS. In a multivariate analysis, age (HR:2.06) and rituximab use (HR:0.54) were associated with OS. Among patients <65 years who achieved a CR, autologous stem‐cell transplant was associated with higher 2‐year OS (90% vs 74%, P = 0.10). Patients who were treated with a targeted therapy in the context of a clinical trial after second‐line treatment had a higher 2‐year OS (34% vs 19%, P = 0.06). In conclusion, patients with primary refractory disease or early relapse have very poor outcomes but may benefit from rituximab retreatment during the first salvage treatment.     

Evaluation of a new oil adjuvant for use in peptide‐based cancer vaccination

Vaccine therapies are increasingly being used for the treatment of various diseases, and the antigen molecules themselves are being expanded from whole microorganisms to fine molecules such as peptides. Accordingly, there is a need for new adjuvants to support these new applications. In this paper, we used pharmaceutical grade mineral oil and sorbitan monooleate to develop a new oil adjuvant formula, NH₂, and investigated its effects on peptide vaccination at both the pre‐clinical and clinical levels. The adjuvant effect of NH₂ on peptide‐induced cellular immunity in mice was superior to that of Montanide ISA51VG, a commercially available incomplete Freund’s adjuvant for clinical use, although no significant difference was observed between the two adjuvants on peptide‐induced humoral immunity. The adjuvant effects of NH₂ were also confirmed in a Phase‐I clinical trial of peptide vaccines for patients with advanced cancers. These results suggest that NH₂ is a suitable adjuvant for peptide vaccination, particularly for cancer vaccines (Phase‐I clinical trial of pan‐HLA type personalized peptide vaccine for advanced cancer patients, UMIN clinical trial registry number: UMIN 000000619). (Cancer Sci 2010)     

PD‐1 expression on peripheral blood T‐cell subsets correlates with prognosis in non‐small cell lung cancer

PD-1 expression in peripheral blood T-cells has been reported in several kinds of cancers, including lung cancer. However, the relationship between PD-1 expression in peripheral blood T-cells and prognosis after treatment with a cancer vaccine has not been reported. To elucidate this relationship, we analyzed PD-1 expression in the peripheral blood T-cells of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The blood samples used in this study were obtained from patients enrolled in phase II clinical trials of a personalized peptide vaccine. Seventy-eight samples obtained before and after a single vaccination cycle (consisting of six or eight doses) were subjected to the analysis. PD-1 was expressed on lymphocytes in the majority of samples. The relative contents of PD1⁺CD4⁺ T-cells against total lymphocytes before and after the vaccination cycle correlated with overall survival (OS) with a high degree of statistical significance (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0014). A decrease in PD-1⁺CD8⁺ T-cells after one cycle of vaccination also correlated with longer OS (P = 0.032). The IgG response to the non-vaccinated peptides suggested that the epitope spreading seemed to occur more frequently in high-PD-1⁺CD4⁺ T-cell groups. Enrichment of CD45RA⁻CCR7⁻ effector-memory phenotype cells in PD-1⁺ T-cells in PBMCs was also shown. These results suggest that PD-1 expression on the peripheral blood T-cell subsets can become a new prognostic marker in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with personalized peptide vaccination.     

Heat shock protein 105 peptide vaccine could induce antitumor immune reactions in a phase I clinical trial

Heat shock protein 105 (HSP105) is overexpressed in many cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC) and esophageal cancer (EC). We carried out a phase I clinical trial of HLA‐A24‐ and HLA‐A2‐restricted HSP105 peptide vaccines in patients with CRC or EC. In this additional study of the trial, we examined the immunological efficacy of the novel vaccine. Thirty patients with advanced CRC or EC underwent HSP105 peptide vaccination. Immunological responses were evaluated by ex vivo and in vitro γ‐interferon enzyme‐linked immunospot assays and their correlation with patients’ prognosis was analyzed. The HSP105 peptide vaccines induced peptide‐specific CTLs in 15 of 30 patients. Among HLA‐A24 patients (n = 15), 7 showed induction of CTLs only ex vivo, whereas among HLA‐A2 patients (n = 15), 4 showed the induction ex vivo and 6 in vitro. Heat shock protein 105‐specific CTL induction correlated with suppression of cancer progression and was revealed as a potential predictive biomarker for progression‐free survival (P = .008; hazard ratio = 3.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.34‐6.85) and overall survival (P = .025; hazard ratio = 2.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.13‐6.52). Production of cytokines by HSP105 peptide‐specific CTLs was observed at the injection sites (skin) and tumor tissues, suggesting that HSP105‐specific CTLs not only accumulated at vaccination sites but also infiltrated tumors. Furthermore, we established 2 HSP105 peptide‐specific CTL clones, which showed HSP105‐specific cytokine secretion and cytotoxicity. Our results suggest that the HSP105 peptide vaccine could induce immunological effects in cancer patients and improve their prognosis.     

Quantitative proteomic analysis of mitochondria from human ovarian cancer cells and their paclitaxel‐resistant sublines

Paclitaxel resistance is a major obstacle for the treatment of ovarian cancer. The chemoresistance mechanisms are partly related to the mitochondria. Identification of the relevant proteins in mitochondria will help in clarifying the possible mechanisms and in selecting effective chemotherapy for patients with paclitaxel resistance. In the present study, mitochondria from two paclitaxel‐sensitive human ovarian cancer cell lines (SKOV3 and A2780) and their corresponding resistant cell lines (SKOV3‐TR and A2780‐TR) were isolated. Guanidine‐modified acetyl‐stable isotope labeling and liquid chromatography‐hybrid linear ion trap Fourier‐transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (LC‐FTICR MS) were performed to find the expressed differential proteins. Comparative proteomic analysis revealed eight differentially expressed proteins in the ovarian cancer cells and their paclitaxel‐resistant sublines. Among them, mimitin and 14‐3‐3 ζ/δ were selected for further research. The effects of mimitin and 14‐3‐3 ζ/δ were explored using specific siRNA interference in ovarian cancer cell lines and immunohistochemistry in human tissue specimens. The downregulation of mimitin and 14‐3‐3 ζ/δ using specific siRNA in paclitaxel‐resistant ovarian cancer cells led to an increase in the resistance index to paclitaxel. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that lower expression levels of the mimitin and 14‐3‐3 ζ/δ proteins were positively associated with shorter progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with primary ovarian cancer (mimitin: PFS: P = 0.041, OS: P = 0.003; 14‐3‐3 ζ/δ: PFS: P = 0.031, OS: P = 0.011). Mimitin and 14‐3‐3 protein ζ/δ are potential markers of paclitaxel resistance and prognostic factors in ovarian cancer.     

Peptide vaccine as an adjuvant therapy for glypican‐3‐positive hepatocellular carcinoma induces peptide‐specific CTLs and improves long prognosis

There is no established postoperative adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and improvement of patient prognosis has been limited. We conducted long‐term monitoring of patients within a phase II trial that targeted a cancer antigen, glypican‐3 (GPC3), specifically expressed in HCC. We sought to determine if the GPC3 peptide vaccine was an effective adjuvant therapy by monitoring disease‐free survival and overall survival. We also tracked GPC3 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, CTL induction, and postoperative plasma GPC3 for a patient group that was administered the vaccine (n = 35) and an unvaccinated patient group that underwent surgery only (n = 33). The 1‐y recurrence rate after surgery was reduced by approximately 15%, and the 5‐y and 8‐y survival rates were improved by approximately 10% and 30%, respectively, in the vaccinated group compared with the unvaccinated group. Patients who were positive for GPC3 IHC staining were more likely to have induced CTLs, and 60% survived beyond 5 y. Vaccine efficacy had a positive relationship with plasma concentration of GPC3; high concentrations increased the 5‐y survival rate to 75%. We thus expect GPC3 vaccination in patients with HCC, who are positive for GPC3 IHC staining and/or plasma GPC3 to induce CTL and have significantly improved long‐term prognosis.     

Immunotherapeutic benefit of α‐interferon (IFNα) in survivin2B‐derived peptide vaccination for advanced pancreatic cancer patients

Survivin, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family containing a single baculovirus IAP repeat domain, is highly expressed in cancerous tissues but not in normal counterparts. Our group identified an HLA‐A24‐restricted antigenic peptide, survivin‐2B80–88 (AYACNTSTL), that is recognized by CD8 + CTLs and functions as an immunogenic molecule in patients with cancers of various histological origins such as colon, breast, lung, oral, and urogenital malignancies. Subsequent clinical trials with this epitope peptide alone resulted in clinical and immunological responses. However, these were not strong enough for routine clinical use as a therapeutic cancer vaccine, and our previous study of colon cancer patients indicated that treatment with a vaccination protocol of survivin‐2B80–88 plus incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA) and α‐interferon (IFNα) conferred overt clinical improvement and enhanced the immunological responses of patients. In the current study, we further investigated whether this vaccination protocol could efficiently provide not only improved immune responses but also better clinical outcomes for advanced pancreatic cancers. Tetramer and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent spot analysis data indicated that more than 50% of the patients had positive clinical and immunological responses. In contrast, assessment of treatment with IFNα only to another group of cancer patients resulted in no obvious increase in the frequency of survivin‐2B80‐88 peptide‐specific CTLs. Taken together, our data clearly indicate that a vaccination protocol of survivin‐2B80‐88 plus IFA and IFNα is very effective and useful in immunotherapy for this type of poor‐prognosis neoplasm. This trial was registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, no. UMIN000000905. (Cancer Sci 2013; 104: 124–129)     

Results of the first phase 1 clinical trial of the HER‐2/neu peptide (GP2) vaccine in disease‐free breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND:

HER‐2/neu, overexpressed in breast cancer, is a source of immunogenic peptides that include GP2 and E75. Phase 2 testing of E75 as an adjuvant vaccine has suggested a clinical benefit. GP2, derived from the transmembrane portion of HER‐2/neu, has differing binding characteristics and may be more immunogenic than E75. Results of the first phase 1 trial of GP2 peptide vaccine are presented.

METHODS:

Disease‐free, lymph node‐negative, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)‐A2⁺ breast cancer patients were enrolled. This dose escalation trial included 4 groups to determine safety and optimal GP2 peptide/granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) dose. Toxicities were monitored. Immunologic response was assessed ex vivo via the HLA‐A2:immunoglobulin dimer assay to detect GP2‐specific CD8⁺ T cells (and E75‐specific CD8⁺ T cells to assess epitope spreading) and in vivo via delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) reaction (medians/ranges).

RESULTS:

Eighteen patients were enrolled. All toxicities were grade ≤2. Eight (88.9%) of 9 patients in the first 3 dose groups required GM‐CSF dose reductions for local reactions ≥100 mm or grade ≥2 systemic toxicity. GM‐CSF dose was reduced to 125 μg for the final dose group. All patients responded immunologically ex vivo (GP2‐specific CD8⁺ T cells from prevaccination to maximum, 0.4% [0.0%‐2.0%] to 1.1% [0.4%‐3.6%], P < .001) and in vivo (GP2 pre‐ to postvaccination DTH, 0 mm [0.0‐19.5 mm] to 27.5 mm [0.0‐114.5 mm, P < .001). E75‐specific CD8⁺ T cells also increased in response to GP2 from prevaccination to maximum (0.8% [0.0%‐2.41%] to 1.6% [0.86%‐3.72%], P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The GP2 peptide vaccine appears safe and well tolerated with minimal local/systemic toxicity. GP2 elicited HER‐2/neu–specific immune responses, including epitope spreading, in high‐risk, lymph node‐negative breast cancer patients. These findings support further investigation of the GP2 vaccine for the prevention of breast cancer recurrence. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Association of WT1 IgG antibody against WT1 peptide with prolonged survival in glioblastoma multiforme patients vaccinated with WT1 peptide

We previously evaluated Wilms’ tumor gene 1 (WT1) peptide vaccination in a large number of patients with leukemia or solid tumors and have reported that HLA‐A*24:02 restricted, 9‐mer WT1‐235 peptide (CYTWNQMNL) vaccine induces cellular immune responses and elicits WT1‐235‐specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). However, whether this vaccine induces humoral immune responses to produce WT1 antibody remains unknown. Thus, we measured IgG antibody levels against the WT1‐235 peptide (WT1‐235 IgG antibody) in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) receiving the WT1 peptide vaccine. The WT1‐235 IgG antibody, which was undetectable before vaccination, became detectable in 30 (50.8%) of a total of 59 patients during 3 months of WT1 peptide vaccination. The dominant WT1‐235 IgG antibody subclass was Th1‐type, IgG₁ and IgG₃. WT1‐235 IgG antibody production was significantly and positively correlated with both progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Importantly, the combination of WT1‐235 IgG antibody production and positive delayed type‐hypersensitivity (DTH) to the WT1‐235 peptide was a better prognostic marker for long‐term OS than either parameter alone. These results suggested that WT1‐235 peptide vaccination induces not only WT1‐235‐specific CTLs as previously described but also WT1‐235‐specific humoral immune responses associated with antitumor cellular immune response. Our results indicate that the WT1 IgG antibody against the WT1 peptide may be a useful predictive marker, with better predictive performance in combination with DTH to WT1 peptide, and provide a new insight into the antitumor immune response induction in WT1 peptide vaccine‐treated patients.     

Maintenance of long remission in adult T‐cell leukemia by Tax‐targeted vaccine: A hope for disease‐preventive therapy

Adult T‐cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) is an aggressive lymphoproliferative disease caused by human T‐cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV‐1). Multi‐agent chemotherapy can reduce ATL cells but frequently allows relapses within a short period of time. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) following chemotherapy is now a standard therapy for ATL in Japan as it can achieve long‐term remission in approximately one‐third of recipient ATL patients; however, it also has a risk of treatment‐related mortality. Allo‐HSCT often induces HTLV‐1 Tax‐specific cytotoxic T cells (CTL) as well as graft‐versus‐host (GVH) response in ATL patients. This observation led to development of a new therapeutic vaccine to activate Tax‐specific CTL, anticipating anti‐ATL effects without GVH response. The newly developed Tax‐DC vaccine consists of autologous dendritic cells pulsed with Tax peptides corresponding to CTL epitopes that have been identified in post‐allo‐HSCT ATL patients. In a pilot study of Tax‐DC therapy in three ATL patients after various initial therapies, two patients survived for more than 4 years after vaccination without severe adverse effects (UMIN000011423). The Tax‐DC vaccine is currently under phase I trial, showing a promising clinical outcome so far. These findings indicate the importance of patients’ own HTLV‐1‐specific T‐cell responses in maintaining remission and provide a new approach to anti‐ATL immunotherapy targeting Tax. Although Tax‐targeted vaccination is ineffective against Tax‐negative ATL cells, it can be a safe alternative maintenance therapy for Tax‐positive ATL and may be further applicable for treatment of indolent ATL or even prophylaxis of ATL development among HTLV‐1‐carriers.     

Survival benefit from S‐1 as compared to Fluorouracil in Asian patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer: A meta‐analysis

Whether S‐1 could replace 5‐Fluorouracil (5‐Fu) or not in the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer (including advanced gastric cancer [AGS] and metastatic colorectal cancer [mCRC]) in Asian patients has been controversial. This meta‐analysis was performed to compare the activity, efficacy and toxicity of S‐1‐based versus 5‐Fu‐based chemotherapy in those Asian patients. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified by electronic search of Pubmed. Relevant abstracts were manually searched to identify relevant trials. A total of 2182 patients from eight RCTs were included, and our results demonstrated that S‐1‐based chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–1.00) and overall response rate (ORR) (odds ratio [OR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.09–2.70), but no significant progression‐free survival (PFS) benefit was found between arms (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72–1.06). Subgroup analyses revealed that S‐1‐based chemotherapy significantly improved OS and ORR in subgroups of patients with non‐platinum containing regimens (P = 0.041; P = 0.034) and patients with no prior chemotherapy history (P = 0.025; P = 0.016). Statistically significant improvements of PFS and ORR in the S‐1‐based chemotherapy were observed in the subgroup of patients with AGC (P < 0.001; P = 0.005). S‐1‐based chemotherapy was characterized by significantly higher incidences of diarrhea, fatigue and thrombocytopenia, and a lower incidence of nausea. This analysis provided strong evidence for survival benefits of S‐1, and S‐1‐based chemotherapy could be considered to replace 5‐Fu‐based therapy for the treatment of advanced GI cancer in Asian patients.