Longitudinal control of blood pressure among a cohort of Ghanaians with hypertension: A multicenter,hospital‐based study

There are limited data on factors associated with longitudinal control of blood pressure (BP) among Ghanaians on antihypertensive treatment. We sought to evaluate associations between prospective BP control and 24 putative factors within socio‐demographic, biological, and organizational domains. This is a cohort study involving 1867 (65%) adults with hypertension and 1006 (35%) with both hypertension and diabetes mellitus at five public hospitals. Clinic BP was measured every 2 months for 18 months of follow‐up. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was fitted via generalized linear mixed models to identify factors associated with clinic BP ≥ 140/90 mm Hg at each clinic visit during follow‐up. Mean age of study participants was 58.9 ± 16.6 years and 76.8% were females. Proportions with controlled BP increased from 46.3% at baseline to 59.8% at month 18, P < .0001. Eight factors with adjusted OR (95% CI) associated prospectively with uncontrolled BP were male gender: 1.37 (1.09‐1.72), secondary education: 1.32 (1.00‐1.74), non‐adherence to antihypertensive treatment: 1.03 (1.00‐1.06), fruit intake: 0.94 (0.89‐1.00), duration of hypertension diagnosis: 1.01 (1.00‐1.02), hypertension with diabetes mellitus: 2.05 (1.72‐2.46), number of antihypertensive medications: 1.63 (1.49‐1.79), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min rise): 0.82 (0.76‐0.89). Interventions aimed at addressing modifiable factors associated with poorly controlled BP would be critical in prevention of cardiovascular diseases among Ghanaians.     

Validation of a French version of the 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale in hypertensive adults

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012; 14:429–434. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. The aim of this study was to validate a French translation of the structured self‐report 8‐item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS‐8) and determine its psychometric properties in patients taking antihypertensive medication. An observational cross‐sectional study was conducted in the hypertensive unit of a French university hospital. The MMAS‐8 was translated according to international guidelines. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach α coefficient, construct validity using principal component and confirmatory factor analyses, and the test‐retest reliability at 1‐month interval using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Three levels of adherence were considered (low: scores of 0 to <6; medium: 6 to <8; high: 8) and risk factors were explored in ordinal logistic regression models. A total of 199 patients were included: mean age, 55.7±14.6 years, 57.3% men (114 of 199), and 39.5% (66 of 167) had uncontrolled blood pressure. The French MMAS was moderately reliable (α=0.54), one‐dimensional, and reproducible (ICC=0.68). The mean score was 6.96 (standard deviation 1.25) and 17.6% (35 of 199), 37.7% (75 of 199), and 43.7% (87 of 199) of patients had low, medium, and high adherence, respectively. The only factor significantly associated with adherence was age. The French MMAS has acceptable psychometric effects to measure medication adherence in hypertensive patients and may be useful in detecting nonadherent hypertensive patients.     

A nationwide assessment of blood pressure control and the associated factors in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

A subgroup analysis of the nationwide, cross‐sectional 3B STUDY was performed to understand the current blood pressure (BP) control status and treatment patterns in Chinese diabetes patients as well as to identify factors associated with BP control. The demographic data, anthropometric parameters, and laboratory results were collected from 24 512 type 2 diabetes patients. The BP goal was a systolic BP <130 mm Hg and a diastolic BP <80 mm Hg regardless of a history of hypertension or current antihypertensive treatment. The overall prevalence of hypertension was 59.9% with geographical differences. Among the diabetes patients with hypertension, 76.9% received antihypertensive medicines. Calcium channel blockers (39.3%), angiotensin II receptor antagonists (26.6%), and then β‐blockers (14.0%) or angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (13.6%) were frequently used for BP control. Only 17.5% (n = 2658) of diabetes patients with hypertension reached the recommended target BP. Body mass index <24 kg/m², urban resident, frequent physical activity, good adherence to medication, comorbidity with cardiovascular disease, achieving glycemic goal (HbA1c <7.0%), achieving lipid goal (low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol <2.59 mmol/L) were independent factors that predicted achievement of target BP goal. On the contrary, comorbidity with chronic kidney disease predicted failure to achieve target BP goal. Patients who were treated in a cardiology department or lived in the North were more likely to achieve BP goals. A considerable proportion of diabetic patients failed to achieve guideline‐recommended BP targets. More aggressive efforts should be made to overcome the diverse barriers and facilitate the optimization of diabetes management.     

Adherence to antihypertensive therapy affects Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index

Background

A major contributor to poor blood pressure (BP) control is nonadherence to therapy, which remains poorly recognized by physicians. The prevention of hypertension-induced changes in arterial wall, namely increased arterial stiffness and peripheral vascular resistance, is a reasoned adequate end-point of hypertension treatment. Indirect measurement of these arterial factors can be derived from the analysis of 24-hour Ambulatory BP Monitoring (24 h-ABPM). This pilot study evaluated the association between antihypertensive therapy adherence and 24 h-ABPM-derived parameters in hypertensive patients.

Methods

We studied 42 hypertensive patients (70 ± 10 years) in chronic antihypertensive therapy. Patients were divided according to the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) in Low-Adher (MMAS < 6) and High-Adher (MMAS 6-8) groups. The Ambulatory Arterial Stiffness Index (AASI) and its symmetric calculation (Sym_AASI) were derived from 24 h-ABPM. A bivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of MMAS for increased AASIs (i.e. above the median).

Results

Low-Adher group (n = 17) showed higher AASIs compared to High-Adher group (n = 25). The two groups were similar in terms of BP burden at the 24 h-ABPM. AASIs were inversely related to MMAS. MMAS resulted a predictor for both increased AASI (O.R. 0.49, 95% CI 0.31-0.76, P < 0.01) and increased Sym_AASI (O.R. 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.95, P = 0.026). After adjustment for PP, age and nocturnal diastolic BP reduction, MMAS persisted as an inverse predictor only of increased AASI. MMAS was also related to the diastolic vs systolic BP correlation coefficient r.

Conclusions

Low adherence to antihypertensive therapy seems to be associated with increased standard AASI. In this setting, AASI could represent an additional information derived from the 24 h-ABPM in hypertensive patient evaluation.     

Relationship between health‐related quality of life and blood pressure control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension

We sought to investigate the psychosocial characteristics of patients with uncontrolled hypertension and examine factors that influence blood pressure (BP) control. A total of 1011 patients with uncontrolled hypertension were enrolled in 13 tertiary hospitals. Uncontrolled hypertension was defined as systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg despite on antihypertensive therapy. Socio‐demographics, anthropometrics, behavioral risk factors, medication pattern, adherence, and measures of health‐related quality of life (HRQoL; EuroQol 5D visual analog scale [EQ‐5D VAS]) were assessed at baseline and during follow‐up visits (3 and 6 months). Patients were divided into 2 groups based on BP control status at 6 months (controlled group [n = 532] vs uncontrolled group [n = 367]). There were no differences in clinical characteristics except the proportion of smokers and baseline BP between patients with controlled BP and uncontrolled BP. At 6 months, the adherence of antihypertensive medication did not differ between the groups but the proportion of combination therapy with ≥3 antihypertensives was significantly higher in patients with uncontrolled BP. EQ‐5D VAS at follow‐up was significantly lower in patients with uncontrolled BP despite similar baseline values. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that EQ‐5D VAS at follow‐up significantly correlated with BP control. Patients with worse HRQoL had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and higher proportion of taking ≥3 antihypertensives, but medication adherence was similar to those with better HRQoL. These findings suggest that along with pharmacologic intervention of hypertension, management of comorbid conditions or psychological support might be helpful for optimizing BP control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.     

Resistant Hypertension: Risk Factors,Subclinical Atherosclerosis,and Comorbidities Among Adults—The Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA‐Brasil)

The frequency of resistant hypertension—defined as blood pressure (BP) ≥140/90 mm Hg with proven use of three antihypertensive medications, or as the use of four antihypertensive drug classes regardless of BP—is unknown in low‐middle–income countries. Using data from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health, a cohort of 15,105 civil servants aged 35 to 74 years, the authors identified 4116 patients taking treatment for hypertension, 11% of who had resistant hypertension. These participants were more likely to be older, black, less educated, poorer, and obese. The adjusted prevalence ratios (95% confidence intervals) were diabetes, 1.44 (1.20–1.72); glomerular filtration rate (<60 mL/min/1.72 m²), 1.95 (1.60–2.38); albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio (>300 mg/g), 2.43 (1.70–3.50); carotid‐femoral pulse‐wave velocity, 1.07 m/s (1.03–1.11 m/s); common carotid intima‐media thickness, 2.57 mm (1.64–4.00 mm); left ventricular hypertrophy, 2.08 (1.21–3.57); and atrial fibrillation, 3.55 (2.02–6.25). Thus, the prevalence of resistant hypertension in Brazil is high and associated with subclinical markers of end‐organ cardiovascular damage.     

Antihypertensive drug use and blood pressure control among stroke survivors in the United States: NHANES 2003‐2014

Understanding the patterns of antihypertensive drug use and blood pressure (BP) control among stroke survivors in the “real‐world” setting is important to identify gaps in treatment and control, if any. The objective of our study was to assess trends and patterns in antihypertensive drug use and BP control among stroke survivors in the United States. We performed a retrospective cross‐sectional analysis of the 2003‐2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Stroke and hypertension diagnoses were self‐reported. Information regarding the use of antihypertensive drugs was collected during an in‐person interview. Measurement of BP was performed by trained medical professionals in mobile examination centers. A total 1244 adult stroke survivors (equating to 6 232 215 stroke survivors nationwide) were identified, of which 956 had hypertension. Antihypertensive drug use increased from 2003 (79.5%) to 2014 (92.2%; P for trend < 0.001). The prevalence of drug use was lower (52%) among survivors aged 20‐39 years compared with older age groups. Use of ≥2 antihypertensive drugs was prevalent (63.8%), but diuretics alone or in combination with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors were underutilized (22.4%). More than one‐third of the survivors were not at BP goal (ie, BP < 140/90 mm Hg). Males were more likely to attain BP goal than female stroke survivors (odds ratio [OR] = 2.02; 95% CI: 1.34‐3.05). Our findings suggest that despite improvements in antihypertensive drug use in the recent years, BP is not adequately controlled in a significant proportion of stroke survivors. Further research focusing on understanding the reasons for unmet BP goal in stroke survivors is needed.     

Patterns of hypertension management in France in 2015: The ESTEBAN survey

The purposes of this study were to describe the hypertensive population and therapeutic management of hypertension in adults between 18 and 74 years of age in France in 2015.
Esteban survey is a cross‐sectional survey with a clinical examination conducted in a representative sample of French adults aged 18‐74 years between 2014 and 2016. Esteban was entirely public‐funded. Blood pressure (BP) was measured during clinical examination with a standardized protocol, and pharmacological treatment was collected through the exhaustive Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS) database. Hypertension was defined by systolic BP (SBP)> 140 mm Hg, diastolic BP (DBP)> 90 mm Hg or treatment with BP‐lowering drugs. The therapeutic control of treated hypertensive patients was defined by SBP < 140 mm Hg and DBP < 90 mm Hg.
Adherence to drug treatment was defined as more than 80% of days covered by BP‐lowering drug per year. The prevalence of hypertension was 31.3%. 74.7% of aware hypertensive participants taking an antihypertensive drug, and 57.7% of them were treated with a single antihypertensive pharmacological class. Overall, among hypertensives, 24.3% had a satisfactory BP control. Only 49.7% of treated hypertensives participants were controlled, and 33.6% of them were adherent to their drug treatment. The prevalence of hypertension in France remains high, with only 74.7% of the aware hypertensive participants receiving pharmacological therapy and only 48.9% of aware hypertensives with a BP at goal. More effective measures are needed to improve clinical management of hypertension in France.     

Independent predictors of effective blood pressure control in patients with hypertension on drug treatment in Brazil

Population assessment of effective blood pressure (BP) control is fundamental for reducing the global burden of hypertension, especially in low‐ and middle‐income countries. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of BP control and determined independent predictors associated with effective control among patients with hypertension on drug treatment in a large cross‐sectional study performed in two metropolitan areas in Brazil's southeast region. A total of 43 647 patients taking antihypertensive treatment were identified. Less than half of the patients (40.9%) had controlled BP (systolic BP <140 mm Hg and diastolic BP <90 mm Hg). Independent predictors of BP control were age, eating fruit daily, physical activity, previous cardiovascular disease, male sex, diabetes mellitus, ethnicity, and obesity. Simple variables associated with BP control may be utilized for knowledge translation strategies aiming to reduce the burden of hypertension.     

First‐line treatment of essential hypertension: A real‐world analysis across four antihypertensive treatment classes

The relative efficacy of antihypertensive treatment has been assessed primarily by randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The increasing availability of electronic medical records (EMR) allows results from RCT to be compared to data from actual clinical practice. EMR from TriNetX were used to compare patients starting and adhering to antihypertensive treatment on diuretics, beta blockers, angiotensin II or ACE inhibitors, or calcium channel blockers for at least 36 months. Cardiovascular (CV) events as defined by ICD‐10 codes were evaluated for an observation period of three years. Outcomes were assessed with and without propensity score matching for confounding factors. A total of 79 288 patients fulfilled the criteria for first‐line therapy and adherence (17.4% diuretics, 25.9% beta blockers, 45.1% inhibitors of the renin‐angiotensin system, and 11.6% calcium channel blockers). Differences in demography and comorbidities were consistent with expectations based on treatment guidelines. RAS blockers showed the best BP control (28.7% episodes of uncontrolled BP) and, together with diuretics, the lowest rate of CV events (diuretics, 5.2%; RAS blockers, 5.4%). Beta blockers were associated with the highest rate of uncontrolled BP (45.9%) and a high CV event rate (9.5%). These trends remained after matching the cohorts for confounding factors. EMR show that actual prescribing behavior for first‐line treatment of essential hypertension reflects treatment guidelines. Patients taking either RAS blockers or diuretics experienced the lowest CV event rates. Beta blockers, even when adjusted for pre‐existing cardiovascular conditions, do not seem to be as protective against CV events as the three other classes.     

Aortic blood pressure and arterial stiffness in patients with controlled resistant and non‐resistant hypertension

The purpose of the current study was to determine whether aortic blood pressure (BP) and arterial stiffness are greater in patients with controlled resistant hypertension (RHTN) than controlled non‐resistant hypertension (non‐RHTN) despite similar clinic BP level. Participants were recruited from University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Hypertension Clinic. Controlled hypertension was defined as automated office BP measurement with BP < 135/85 mm Hg. A total of 141 participants were evaluated by pulse wave analysis (PWA) and carotid‐femoral pulse wave velocity (cf‐PWV). Among them, 75 patients had controlled RHTN with use of 4 or more antihypertensive medications and 56 patients had controlled non‐RHTN with use of 3 or less antihypertensive medications. Compared to patients with controlled non‐RHTN, those with controlled RHTN were more likely to be African American and had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure. The mean number of antihypertensive medications was greater in patients with controlled RHTN (4.4 ± 0.8 vs 2.3 ± 0.7, P < .001). Clinic brachial BP, aortic BP, augmentation pressure (AP), augmentation index normalized for heart rate of 75 beats per minute (AIx@75) and cf‐PWV were similar in both groups. In summary, there was no significant difference in central BP or arterial stiffness between patients with controlled RHTN and controlled non‐RHTN. These findings suggest that the higher residual cardiovascular risk observed in patients with RHTN after achieving BP control compared to patients with more easily controlled hypertension is not likely attributable to persistent differences in central BP and arterial stiffness.     

Predictors of Uncontrolled Blood Pressure in Treated Hypertensive Individuals: First Population‐Based Study in Lebanon

Arterial hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke. This study aimed to assess the predictors of uncontrolled systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in Lebanon among treated hypertensive individuals. The authors included 562 participants 40 years and older. The potential predictors included sociodemographic characteristics, self‐reported health information, and medication adherence. Prevalence of uncontrolled systolic and diastolic BP reached 43.1% and 24.9%, respectively. Independent predictors of uncontrolled systolic BP were older age, male sex, and low and medium medication adherence level. Predictors of uncontrolled diastolic BP were younger age, obesity, and low medication adherence level. Married individuals and patients taking statins had better diastolic BP control. Uncontrolled BP is a major public health problem in Lebanon. The authors identified low adherence as a major modifiable risk factor for systolic and diastolic BP control and obesity as a major modifiable risk factor for diastolic BP control.     

Blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk profile in hypertensive patients under specialist care in Argentina: Results from the CHARTER study

Worldwide, hypertension control rate is far from ideal. Some studies suggest that patients treated by specialists have a greater chance to achieve control. The authors aimed to determine the BP control rate among treated hypertensive patients under specialist care in Argentina, to characterize patients regarding their cardiovascular risk profile and antihypertensive drug use, and to assess the variables independently associated with adequate BP control. The authors included adult hypertensive patients under stable treatment, managed in 10 specialist centers across Argentina. Office BP was measured thrice with a validated oscillometric device. Adequate BP control was defined as an average of the three readings <140/90 mm Hg (and <150/90 in patients older than 80 years). The authors estimated the proportion of adequate BP control and the variables independently associated with it through a multiple conditional logistic regression model. Among the 1146 included patients, 48.2% were men with a mean age of 63.5 (±13.1) years old. Mean office BP was 135.3 (±14.8)/80.8 (±10) mm Hg, with a 64.8% (95% CI: 62%‐67.6%) of adequate control. The mean number of antihypertensive drugs was 2.1 per participant, the commonest being angiotensin receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers. In multivariable analysis, only female sex was a predictor of adequate BP control (OR 1.33 [95% CI 1.02‐1.72], P = .04). In conclusion, almost 65% of hypertensive patients treated in specialist centers in Argentina have adequate BP control. The challenge for future research is to define strategies in order to translate this control rate to the primary care level, where most patients are managed.     

Self‐blood pressure monitoring is associated with improved awareness,adherence, and attainment of target blood pressure goals: Prospective observational study of 7751 patients

We investigated whether self‐blood pressure monitoring (SBPM) can improve the control rate of blood pressure (BP), adherence of antihypertensive medications, and the awareness of the importance of BP control in hypertensive patients. A total of 7751 patients who visited the outpatient clinics of private and university hospitals in Korea were given automatic electronic BP monitors and were recommended to measure their BP daily at home for 3 months. Changes in office BP, attainment of target BP, adherence to taking antihypertensive drugs, and awareness of BP were compared before and after SBPM. Patients and physicians were surveyed on their perception of BP and SBPM. Mean BP significantly decreased from 142/88 to 129/80 mm Hg (P < .001), and attainment of the target BP increased from 32% to 59% (P < .001) after SBPM. Drug non‐adherence, which was defined as patient's not taking medication days per week, decreased significantly from 0.86 days to 0.53 days (P < .001). The rate of awareness of the BP goal increased from 57% to 81% (P < .001). Patients estimated that their mean BP was 125/81 mm Hg, but their actual mean BP was 142/88 mm Hg. Awareness about the importance of SBPM increased from 90% to 98%. The rate of SBPM ≥ once per week further increased, from 34% to 96%. In conclusion, SBPM is associated with reduced BP, better BP control rate, greater drug adherence, and improved perception of BP by the patients.     

Perception of uncontrolled blood pressure and non-adherence to anti-hypertensive agents in diabetic hypertensive patients

We assessed the association between adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment and patient's perception of uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) in diabetic hypertensive subjects. This was a cross-sectional study that evaluated adherence to antihypertensives (Morisky questionnaire), patients' perception of abnormal BP, office BP, and ambulatory BP monitoring in diabetic hypertensive subjects. We evaluated 323 patients, 65.2% women, aged 56.5 ± 7 years, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 8.0% (range, 6.9%–9.6%), diabetes duration of 10 years (range, 5–17 years). Adherence to drug treatment was 51.4%. Patients who reported hypertension-related symptoms (60.4%) had a lower level of adherence (P < .001). Non-adherence occurred four times more frequently in patients who reported hypertension-related symptoms (P < .001, adjusted for use of three or more anti-hypertensives, age, and duration of diabetes). Non-adherents had higher office diastolic BP (83.6 ± 11.9 vs. 79.8 ± 9.9; P = .003), but no difference between groups was observed considering systolic, diastolic, and mean BP evaluated by ambulatory BP monitoring. Low rates of adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment were observed in outpatient hypertensive diabetic subjects. Perception of uncontrolled BP levels was strongly and independently associated with non-adherence. Non-adherence determined repercussion on office BP that may have clinical implications in cardiovascular risk.     

Hypertension Control and Its Correlates Among Adults Attending a Hypertension Clinic in Tanzania

Hypertension control rates are low in sub‐Saharan Africa. Population‐specific determinants of blood pressure (BP) control have not been adequately described. The authors measured BP and conducted interviews to determine factors associated with BP control among adults attending a hypertension clinic in Tanzania. Three hundred adults were enrolled. BP was controlled in 47.7% of patients at the study visit but only 28.3% over three consecutive visits. Demographic and socioeconomic factors were not associated with control. Obesity and higher medication cost were associated with decreased control. Their effect was mediated through adherence. Good knowledge of (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0–6.1; P=.047), attitudes towards (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.0–7.1; P=.04), and practices concerning (OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 2.3–13.0; P<.001) hypertension were independently associated with increased control, even after adjusting for mediation through adherence. Good adherence had the strongest association with control (OR, 14.6; 95% CI, 5.8–37.0; P<.001). Strategies to reduce hypertension‐related morbidity and mortality in sub‐Saharan Africa should target these factors. Interventional studies of such strategies are needed.     

Which blood pressure measurement,systolic or diastolic,better predicts future hypertension in normotensive young adults?

The impact of age‐related differences in blood pressure (BP) components on new‐onset hypertension is not known. A follow‐up examination of 93 303 normotensive individuals (mean age 41.1 years) who underwent a health checkup in 2005 was conducted every year for 8 years. The primary end point was new‐onset hypertension (systolic BP [SBP]/diastolic BP [DBP] ≥140/90 mm Hg and/or the initiation of antihypertensive medications with self‐reported hypertension). During the mean 4.9 years of follow‐up, 14 590 subjects developed hypertension. The impact of DBP on the risk of developing hypertension compared with optimal BP (SBP <120 mm Hg and DBP <80 mm Hg) was significantly greater than that of SBP in subjects younger than 50 years (hazard ratios, 17.5 for isolated diastolic high‐normal vs 10.5 for isolated systolic high‐normal [P<.001]; 8.0 for isolated diastolic normal vs 4.1 for isolated systolic normal [P<.001]). Among the subjects 50 years and older, the corresponding effects of DBP and SBP were similar. Regarding the risk of new‐onset hypertension, high DBP is more important than SBP in younger adults (<50 years) with normal or high‐normal BP.     

Évaluation de l’adhérence aux médicaments antihypertenseurs chez des patients avec hypertension artérielle résistante recevant un traitement optimal

ObjectivesThe primary objective was to estimate the proportion of non-adherence to antihypertensive drugs in patients with an apparently resistant hypertension despite optimal medical treatment. The secondary objective was to identify related factors to poor adherence.MethodsMonocentric, prospective and observational study, including consecutive patients, managed for an apparently resistant hypertension between January 2014 and December 2017, with an ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABP) in the past year and a thorough etiological work up in the 2 past years. Hypertension was considered resistant if the daytime ABP was ≥ 135/85 mmHg and/or the 24 hours ABP ≥ to 130/80 mmHg, despite 4 antihypertensive medications at optimal doses. Adherence to treatment was assessed by the eight-item Morisky Scale (MMAS-8).ResultsWe enrolled 386 patients, with a mean age of 64.6 years, and 48.2% of men. The mean office blood pressure, 24 hours and daytime APB were 178.6/101.3 mmHg, 164.4/97.2 mmHg and 170.5/99.7 mmHg respectively. The proportions of low, medium and high adherence were 24.5%, 47.6% and 27.9% respectively. Associated-factors with poor adherence were female sex, low education level, celibacy, polypharmacy and lack of home self-blood pressure monitoring.ConclusionOver two out of three patients with an apparently resistant hypertension under optimal treatment were partially or fully nonadherent to treatment in our study. Assessment of adherence would be systematic in these patients before implementing complex investigations or non-pharmacologic invasive procedures.     

Effects of Intensive Antihypertensive Treatment on Chinese Hypertensive Patients Older Than 70 Years

This study was performed to investigate whether intensive antihypertensive treatment with achieved blood pressure (BP) ≤140/90 mm Hg, as compared with standard treatment with achieved BP ≤150/90 mm Hg, could further improve cardiovascular outcomes in Chinese hypertensive patients older than 70 years. A total of 724 participants were randomly assigned to intensive or standard antihypertensive treatment. After a mean follow‐up of 4 years, the mean achieved BP was 135.7/76.2 mm Hg in the intensive treatment group and 149.7/82.1 mm Hg in the standard treatment group. The visit‐to‐visit variability in systolic BP and diastolic BP was lower in the intensive group than that in the standard group. Intensive antihypertensive treatment, compared with the standard treatment, decreased total and cardiovascular mortality by 41.7% and 50.3%, respectively, and reduced fatal/nonfatal stroke by 42.0% and heart failure death by 62.7%. Cox regression analysis indicated that the mean systolic BP (P=.020; 95% confidence interval, 1.006–1.069) and the standard deviation of systolic BP (P=.033; 95% confidence interval, 1.006–1.151) were risk factors for cardiovascular endpoint events. Intensive antihypertensive treatment with achieved 136/76 mm Hg was beneficial for Chinese hypertensive patients older than 70 years. Long‐term visit‐to‐visit variability in systolic BP was positively associated with the incidence of cardiovascular events.     

The impact of fixed‐dose combination versus free‐equivalent combination therapies on adherence for hypertension: a meta‐analysis

Nonadherence to antihypertensive medication is considered as a reason of inadequate control of blood pressure. This meta‐analysis aimed to systemically evaluate the impact of fixed‐dose combination (FDC) therapy on hypertensive medication adherence compared with free‐equivalent combination therapies. Articles were retrieved from MEDLINE and Embase databases using a combination of terms “fixed‐dose combinations” and “adherence or compliance or persistence” and “hypertension or antihypertensive” from January 2000 to June 2017 without any language restriction. A meta‐analysis was performed to parallel compare the impact of FDC vs free‐equivalent combination on medicine adherence or persistence. Studies were independently reviewed by two investigators. Data from eligible studies were extracted and a meta‐analysis was performed using R version 3.1.0 software. A total of nine studies scored as six of nine to eight of nine for Newcastle‐Ottawa rating with 62 481 patients with hypertension were finally included for analysis. Results showed that the mean difference of medication adherence for FDC vs free‐equivalent combination therapies was 14.92% (95% confidence interval, 7.38%–22.46%). Patients in FDC group were more likely to persist with their antihypertensive treatment, with a risk ratio of 1.84 (95% confidence interval, 1.00–3.39). This meta‐analysis confirmed that FDC therapy, compared with free‐equivalent combinations, was associated with better medication adherence or persistence for patients with hypertension. It can be reasonable for physicians, pharmacists, and policy makers to facilitate the use of FDCs for patients who need to take two or more antihypertensive drugs.