Ustekinumab in clinical practice: response depends on dose and previous treatment

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of ustekinumab in a series of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis treated according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) label and to identify factors such as dose, baseline PASI or previous treatment potentially related to therapeutic outcome. Methods Retrospective review of the clinical records from 36 consecutive patients treated with ustekinumab during at least 36 weeks at a single referral center. Candidates for treatment had a PASI ≥ 10 or a BSA ≥ 10 and either failure to respond to, or a contraindication to, or intolerance to some systemic or another biologic treatment. The main outcome measures were PASI improvement with respect to baseline at weeks 12 and 24 (prior to the third injection of ustekinumab). Results Overall 75%, 69%, and 86% patients achieved PASI75 response rates at weeks 12, 24 and 36, respectively. Patients weighing ≤ 100 kg and treated with 45 mg doses had better PASI 50, PASI75 and PASI90 response rates than heavier patients (treated with 90 mg) at every point in time, and the differences were statistically significant at week 24. PASI75 response rates at week 24 were significantly better in patients with no prior exposure to TNFα blocking agents (85% vs. 50%, P = 0.0235). Conclusions In clinical practice, ustekinumab is effective both in biologic‐naÿve patients and as salvage therapy when other biological treatments have failed. The response rates prior to the third injection in our series were better in patients weighing ≤ 100 kg and in those without previous exposure to biologics.     

Long-term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the PHOENIX 1 trial through up to 3 years

Background An unmet need remains for safe and effective long‐term treatments of psoriasis. Objectives To evaluate ustekinumab efficacy and safety for up to 3 years in the PHOENIX 1 trial. Methods Patients (n = 766) with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis were randomized to ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg at weeks 0 and 4, and then every 12 weeks, or placebo at weeks 0 and 4, with crossover to ustekinumab at week 12. Ustekinumab responders [≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at weeks 28 and 40] were re‐randomized at week 40 to continue or withdraw from treatment until psoriasis recurrence. Partial responders (week 28: PASI 50–74; week 40: < PASI 75) switched to dosing every 8 weeks. Clinical efficacy was assessed by PASI, the Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA), and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) measures. Results Overall, 79·8% of the ustekinumab‐treated patients remained in the study for 3 years. PASI 75 response rates (45 mg: 61·2%; 90 mg: 72·4%) at week 76 were maintained through year 3 (45 mg: 62·7%; 90 mg: 72·2%); PGA response was similarly durable. At year 3, 80·9% (45 mg) and 82·7% (90 mg) of week 40 responders continuing treatment every 12 weeks achieved a PASI 75 response, while 42·6% (45 mg) and 58·0% (90 mg) achieved a PASI 90 response. Among partial responders adjusted to dosing every 8 weeks, 50·9% (45 mg) and 52·0% (90 mg) had a PASI 75 response at year 3. DLQI responses paralleled the PASI responses. Through year 3, no dose response was observed in rates of adverse events (AEs), overall infections, serious AEs, or AEs leading to discontinuation; nor was there evidence of cumulative organ toxicity. Conclusions Continuous, stable, maintenance dosing with ustekinumab was generally well tolerated and sustained durable efficacy for up to 3 years of treatment.     

Efficacy of biologics in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background Ustekinumab, a novel monoclonal antibody for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque‐type psoriasis, has recently received regulatory approval in Europe, bringing the total number of biologic agents licensed in this indication to five. To assist treatment selection in daily practice it is essential to understand the benefit/risk profile of these agents and in the absence of a clinical trial comparing all available biologics a number of reviews have used statistical techniques to generate estimates of the comparative effectiveness of these therapies through the available network of randomized clinical trials. These estimates have previously been published for a limited range of psoriasis biologic treatments, although, to date no review has compared all the currently available agents in Europe. Objectives To estimate the comparative effectiveness of all biologic agents indicated in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis currently available in Europe based on the primary trial endpoints. Methods A number of databases were searched for details of randomized controlled trials of available biologics in the treatment of plaque‐type psoriasis in adults. Comparative effectiveness was estimated based on the reported Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 50, 75 and 90 response rates. A network meta‐analysis conducted on the ordered probit scale and implemented as a Bayesian hierarchical model provided estimates for the probability of response and relative risk vs. placebo, based on all observed comparisons. Results Twenty trials were included in the meta‐analysis including patients with a mean disease duration of 18–22 years. Based on the indirect comparison and given a placebo PASI 50 response of 13%, infliximab had the highest predicted mean probability of response at PASI levels 50 (93%), 75 (80%) and 90 (54%), followed by ustekinumab 90 mg at 90%, 74% and 46%, respectively, and then ustekinumab 45 mg, adalimumab, etanercept and efalizumab. Conclusions The ordered probit model allowed a quantitative comparison of all currently licensed biologics, providing estimates on comparative effectiveness and a suggested ranking of treatments that is of potential use to decision‐makers. However, the analysis is based on indirect comparisons of the primary endpoint reported from short‐term randomized trials.     

Guselkumab,an anti‐interleukin‐23 monoclonal antibody,for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque‐type psoriasis in Japanese patients: Efficacy and safety results from a phase 3, randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled study

Previous global studies of guselkumab have demonstrated clinical benefits in patients with psoriasis. The aim of this 52‐week, phase 3 study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of guselkumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque‐type psoriasis. Patients randomly received guselkumab 50 mg or 100 mg at weeks 0, 4 and every 8 weeks, or placebo with cross‐over to guselkumab 50 mg or 100 mg at week 16. Co‐primary end‐points were the proportion of patients achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) cleared/minimal (0/1) and 90% or more improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI‐90) at week 16. Overall, 192 patients were randomized to placebo, guselkumab 50 mg or 100 mg. At week 16, patients in the placebo group were crossed over to guselkumab 50 mg or 100 mg. At week 16, a significantly (P < 0.001) higher proportion of patients receiving guselkumab 50 mg and 100 mg versus placebo achieved IGA 0/1 (92.3% and 88.9% vs 7.8%) and PASI‐90 (70.8% and 69.8% vs 0%). Patients in guselkumab 50 mg and 100 mg groups achieved significant improvement versus placebo in PASI‐75 (89.2% and 84.1% vs 6.3%, P < 0.001) at week 16; improvement was maintained through week 52. Incidences of treatment‐emergent adverse events were comparable among the groups through week 16; the most commonly reported was nasopharyngitis. No new safety concerns were observed until week 52. In conclusion, guselkumab treatment demonstrated superior efficacy over placebo and was well tolerated in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque‐type psoriasis.     

Switching from etanercept to adalimumab is effective and safe: results in 30 patients with psoriasis with primary failure,secondary failure or intolerance to etanercept

Background Knowledge on the sequential treatment of psoriasis with biologics with regard to efficacy and safety is sparse. This also applies to the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients previously treated with etanercept. The relationship between the reasons for discontinuation of etanercept and the response to adalimumab is not clear in psoriasis. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with psoriasis with primary failure, secondary failure or intolerance to etanercept in daily practice. Methods Data were extracted from two prospective registries from all patients with psoriasis with failure on etanercept treatment, who switched to adalimumab therapy. Thirty patients fulfilled these criteria. All patients were naive to biologics when etanercept was initiated. Primary endpoints were the percentage of patients achieving a 50% or 75% improvement of the baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (PASI 50 and PASI 75, respectively) at weeks 12, 24 and 48. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of patients achieving PASI 90, the mean percentage improvement in the PASI score from baseline and the adverse event rate. Results Compared with the baseline PASI score before the start of etanercept, the mean percentage improvement in PASI and the PASI 50/75/90 response rates to adalimumab until week 48 were comparable to those achieved with etanercept. In the patients failing on etanercept, PASI 75 was achieved by 27%, 36% and 54% at weeks 12, 24 and 48 of adalimumab treatment, respectively. The majority of patients showed a beneficial response to adalimumab, irrespective of the reason for discontinuation of etanercept. Previous treatment with etanercept did not increase the adverse event rate nor change the nature of the side‐effects. Conclusions Adalimumab seems to be an effective and safe treatment option for patients with psoriasis who failed on etanercept treatment irrespective of the reason for discontinuation.     

Efficacy comparison of ustekinumab between anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α drug‐naïve and anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α drug‐resistant Japanese psoriasis cases

Ustekinumab is highly efficacious for psoriasis; however, it has not been fully clarified whether previous failure in anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) therapy affects the treatment response with ustekinumab. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of ustekinumab in anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve and anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant cases and compared the clinical efficacies of adalimumab and ustekinumab in biologic naïve cases. Thirty‐five patients with plaque psoriasis who showed resistance to conventional therapies were enrolled; 26 patients, who had never been treated with biologics, were allocated to ustekinumab or adalimumab; nine patients who failed to achieve psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) 50 at week 16 with one or two TNF‐α antagonists were switched to ustekinumab. The end of the study was defined as 52 weeks after starting the first biologic for anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve patients and after switching to ustekinumab for anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant patients. The primary outcome measurement was the percentage of patients achieving PASI75 at week 16. In patients treated with ustekinumab, 87.5% of anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve and 77.8% of anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant cases achieved a PASI75 response at week 16, and no statistically significant difference was found between the treatment response rates (P = 0.60). When comparing the treatment efficacy of ustekinumab and adalimumab among anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve patients, there was also no statistically significant difference in PASI75 achievement rates (87.5 vs. 83.3%, P = 0.79). Our study suggests that ustekinumab can be considered as a first‐line biologic for psoriasis and a rescue therapy for anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant cases.     

Long‐term efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis treated for up to 5 years in the PHOENIX 1 study

Background Ongoing evaluation of biological agents in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis is needed to support their long‐term use. Objective To evaluate long‐term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab through 5 years in the PHOENIX 1 study. Methods Patients were randomized to placebo or ustekinumab (45 mg or 90 mg) at Weeks 0, 4 and every‐12‐weeks thereafter; placebo patients crossed‐over to ustekinumab at Week 12. Clinical response through Week 244 was evaluated using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) in the Overall Population (i.e. patients receiving ≥1 dose of ustekinumab), Initial Responders (i.e. PASI 75 responders [Weeks 28/40] re‐randomized at Week 40 to continue every‐12‐week maintenance) and Partial Responders (i.e. <PASI 75 responders adjusted to every‐8‐week maintenance at Weeks 28 or 40). Safety endpoints were evaluated through Week 264 for the Overall Population. Results  Overall, 68.7% (517/753) of ustekinumab‐treated patients completed treatment through Week 244. Initial clinical responses were generally maintained through Week 244 (PASI 75: 63.4% and 72.0%; PASI 90: 39.7% and 49.0%; PASI 100: 21.6% and 26.4%) for patients receiving 45 mg and 90 mg, respectively. Similarly, PASI 75 responses were generally maintained among Initial Responders [79.1% (45 mg) and 80.8% (90 mg)] and Partial Responders [57.6% (45 mg) and 55.1% (90 mg)]. With 3104 patient‐years of follow‐up, rates of overall adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, serious infections, malignancies and major adverse cardiovascular events were generally consistent over time and comparable between doses. Conclusions Through 5 years of continuous treatment, ustekinumab demonstrated stable clinical response and a safety profile consistent with previous reports.     

Practical experience of ustekinumab in the treatment of psoriasis: experience from a multicentre, retrospective case cohort study across the U.K. and Ireland

Background There are limited data on the use of ustekinumab outside of clinical trials. Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with severe psoriasis attending 10 dermatology centres in the U.K. and Ireland. Methods A retrospective case‐note review of 129 patients with psoriasis treated with ustekinumab. Results Baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was 22·9 ± 10·1 (mean ± SD). After 16 weeks of treatment with ustekinumab PASI 75 (75% reduction in PASI) was observed in 63·0% (n = 80/127) of patients, although four patients required concomitant therapy at the 16‐week time point. Previous biologic use did show a small, non‐significant trend towards treatment failure. A PASI 75 response was seen in 29·4% (n = 5/17) of individuals weighing 90–100 kg and treated with the standard 45 mg ustekinumab dose compared with PASI 75 of 70·3%, 71·4%, 75·0% and 55·6% for weight groups < 80, 80–90, 100–110 and > 110 kg, respectively (P = 0·024). Ustekinumab therapy was well tolerated; serious adverse events were observed in 2·3% (n = 3/129) of patients. Conclusions Ustekinumab is a novel biologic agent for psoriasis. When used in everyday clinical practice it demonstrates high levels of short‐term therapeutic efficacy with an acceptable short‐term safety profile.     

Efficacy and safety of risankizumab in Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Results from the SustaIMM phase 2/3 trial

Risankizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody, selectively inhibits interleukin‐23, a key cytokine in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, by binding to its p19 subunit. In SustaIMM (ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT03000075), a phase 2/3, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled study, Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (n = 171) were stratified by bodyweight and concomitant psoriatic arthritis and randomized 2:2:1:1 to 75 mg risankizumab, 150 mg risankizumab, placebo with cross‐over to 75 mg risankizumab and placebo with cross‐over to 150 mg risankizumab. Dosing was at weeks 0, 4, 16, 28 and 40, with placebo cross‐over to risankizumab at week 16. The primary end‐point was 90% or more improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI‐90) at week 16 for risankizumab versus placebo. Missing data were imputed as non‐response. All primary and psoriasis‐related secondary end‐points were met for both risankizumab doses (P < 0.001). At week 16, PASI‐90 responses were significantly higher in patients receiving 75 mg (76%) or 150 mg (75%) risankizumab versus placebo (2%). Corresponding response rates were 86%, 93% and 10% for static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) score of clear/almost clear; 90%, 95% and 9% for PASI‐75; and 22%, 33% and 0% for PASI‐100, with significantly higher responses for both risankizumab doses versus placebo. Through week 52, PASI and sPGA responses increased or were maintained and treatment‐emergent adverse events were comparable across treatment groups. Both doses of risankizumab were superior to placebo in treating patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The safety profile was consistent with previous risankizumab trials, with no new or unexpected safety findings.     

Impact of obesity on the efficacy of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with psoriasis: a retrospective cohort study of 111 patients

Obesity is thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, although its impact on the therapeutic response to systemic treatments remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the association of body mass index (BMI) with the efficacy of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with psoriasis. Clinical data from a cohort of 111 Japanese patients treated with ustekinumab 45 mg between July 2011 and March 2014 were retrospectively evaluated. The measured outcome was improvement in the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score at week 16. Patients with BMI ≥ 25 and BMI < 25 had comparable rates of ≥50 and 75 % improvement in PASI (PASI-50 and PASI-75, respectively), whereas patients with BMI ≥ 25 had significantly lower PASI-90 and PASI-100 response rates. Patients with BMI ≥ 25 also showed significantly lower percent reduction in PASI than those with BMI < 25 at week 16 (85 vs. 74 %, P < 0.004). BMI was negatively correlated with percent reduction in PASI, whereas body weight was not. These results show that a higher BMI, but not body weight, is associated with lower effectiveness of ustekinumab for psoriasis. BMI ≥ 25 could therefore be a negative predictor of achieving PASI-90 and PASI-100 in patients with psoriasis when starting ustekinumab.     

Association Between Short-Term PASI90 Achievement and Drug Survival of Biologics in Patients with Psoriasis

BackgroundWith accumulating evidence that achieving a 90% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI90) has better correlation with improved health-related quality of life as compared to PASI75 achievement, there has been demand for establishing new treatment goals for psoriasis. We investigated whether the short-term PASI90 achievement would predict longer drug survival as compared to PASI75 achievement.ObjectiveWe investigated whether the short-term PASI90 achievement would predict longer drug survival as compared to PASI75 achievement.MethodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study reviewed 180 treatment series in 128 patients with plaque psoriasis, who were treated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (n=12), ustekinumab (n=88), secukinumab (n=23), guselkumab (n=45), and ixekizumab (n=12). The first effectiveness assessment, usually performed within 12 to 20 weeks, was considered a short-term treatment response to biologics.ResultsAfter adjustment for covariates, time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that moderate responders (short-term achievement of ≥PASI75 but <PASI90) were more likely to discontinue therapy than the excellent responders (short-term achievement of PASI90; adjusted hazard ratio, 3.159; 95% confidence interval, 1.180~8.457; p=0.0220).ConclusionThe short-term PASI90 achievement is a better predictor of longer drug survival as compared to PASI75 achievement.     

Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis: long-term results from a phase 2/3 clinical trial

This phase 2/3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of ustekinumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis. Overall, 158 patients were randomized to receive ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg at weeks 0, 4, and every 12 weeks, or placebo with cross-over to ustekinumab at week 12. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients achieving at least 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at week 12. Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Nail Psoriasis Severity Index and joint pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were also measured. At week 12, 59.4% and 67.7% of ustekinumab 45 and 90 mg patients achieved PASI 75, respectively, compared with 6.5% in the placebo group (P < 0.0001 each). PASI 75 responses were maintained through week 64 in 65.0% and 78.6% of the ustekinumab-treated patients, respectively. Placebo cross-over patients had similar responses to ustekinumab-treated patients. Significant improvements in PGA, DLQI and VAS scores were observed at week 12 and generally maintained over time. Adverse events during the placebo-controlled period were similar among groups (45 mg, 65.6%; 90 mg, 59.7%; placebo, 65.6%). Serious adverse events were observed in 0%, 4.8% and 6.3% of patients, respectively. Through week 72, similar rates and types of adverse events and serious adverse events were reported in patients receiving 45 and 90 mg. Rates of injection site reactions and antibodies to ustekinumab were low. Ustekinumab was efficacious and generally well-tolerated in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis through 72 weeks. These results are consistent with those reported in the global, phase 3 studies.     

Secukinumab demonstrates superior efficacy and a faster response in clearing skin in Asian subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis compared with ustekinumab: Subgroup analysis from the CLEAR study

The 52‐week results from the CLEAR (NCT02074982) study showed high and superior efficacy of secukinumab versus ustekinumab in clearing skin and improving patient‐reported outcomes, with comparable safety profile in subjects with moderate to severe psoriasis. Here, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in Asian subjects from the CLEAR study. In this double‐blind, phase IIIb study, eligible subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were randomized (1:1) to receive s.c. injection of secukinumab 300 mg or ustekinumab as per label. Of 62 subjects included in Asian subanalyses, 23 were randomized to secukinumab and 39 to ustekinumab. A significantly higher proportion of subjects achieved 90% or more improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) with secukinumab versus ustekinumab at week 16 (78.3% vs 35.9%, P = 0.0010) and at week 52 (60.9% vs 33.3%, P = 0.0196). Similarly, a higher proportion of subjects achieved PASI 100 with secukinumab versus ustekinumab at week 16 (43.5% vs 10.3%, P = 0.0029) and at week 52 (30.4% vs 12.8%, P = 0.0704). The median time to achieve 50% improvement in baseline PASI was 2.8 weeks in the secukinumab group versus 6.3 weeks in the ustekinumab group. The safety profile of secukinumab was in line with the known profile and no deaths occurred. Overall, 95.7% and 84.6% of subjects remained on secukinumab and ustekinumab, respectively. Similar to the core study, secukinumab showed sustained and superior efficacy with faster response versus ustekinumab, and no new or unexpected safety concerns were identified, in Asian subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.     

Evaluación de la eficiencia de los tratamientos biológicos en la psoriasis moderada a grave en España: análisis de coste por número necesario a tratar (NNT)

Background and objectivesPsoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with an estimated prevalence in Spain of 2.3% of the population. Approximately 30% of patients have moderate-to-severe forms. Treatment with biologic agents is proving to be a step forward in the management of the disease, although these treatments are very expensive. The objective of this study was to determine the efficiency, in terms of cost per number needed to treat (NNT), of the biologic drugs available in Spain for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.MethodsNNT data were obtained from a network meta-analysis that included all randomized clinical trials of biologic drugs sold in Spain. The cost of each treatment was calculated based on the approved dosage for the first year of treatment, as indicated in the Summary of Product Characteristics. These data were used to calculate the cost per NNT of the drugs for various PASI scores (75, 90, and 100). A sensitivity analysis was performed taking into consideration only the PASI-response measurement time (after 10, 12, or 16 weeks, depending on the drug).ResultsThe order of efficiency, from most to least efficient, in the case of a PASI 75 response was ixekizumab > ustekinumab 45 mg > ustekinumab 90 mg > secukinumab > infliximab > etanercept > adalimumab. The order for PASI 90 was ixekizumab >secukinumab >ustekinumab 45 mg > ustekinumab 90 mg > infliximab > adalimumab > etanercept. The order for PASI 100 was ixekizumab > secukinumab > infliximab > ustekinumab 90 mg > ustekinumab 45 mg > adalimumab > etanercept. The sensitivity analysis showed some changes in the order, depending on the response-assessment period.ConclusionsThe findings show a link between the efficacy of the biologic therapies available in Spain for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and their efficiency. Ixekizumab had the lowest cost per NNT for all PASI-response scores (75, 90, and 100) during the first year of treatment.     

Efficacy and safety results from the randomized controlled comparative study of adalimumab vs. methotrexate vs. placebo in patients with psoriasis (CHAMPION)

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies such as adalimumab, a tumour necrosis factor antagonist, are safe and effective in the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To compare a biologic agent with methotrexate, a traditional systemic agent, to define clearly the role of biologics in psoriasis. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were randomized to adalimumab (80 mg subcutaneously at week 0, then 40 mg every other week, n=108), methotrexate (7.5 mg orally, increased as needed and as tolerated to 25 mg weekly; n=110) or placebo (n=53) for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving at least a 75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) after 16 weeks. Safety was assessed at all visits through week 16. RESULTS: After 16 weeks, 79.6% of adalimumab-treated patients achieved PASI 75, compared with 35.5% for methotrexate (P<0.001 vs. adalimumab) and 18.9% for placebo (P<0.001 vs. adalimumab). Statistically significantly more adalimumab-treated patients (16.7%) than methotrexate-treated patients (7.3%) or placebo-treated patients (1.9%) achieved complete clearance of disease. The response to adalimumab was rapid, with a 57% improvement in mean PASI observed at week 4. Adverse events were similar across treatment groups. Adverse events leading to study discontinuation were greatest in the methotrexate group, primarily because of hepatic-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: After 16 weeks, adalimumab demonstrated significantly superior efficacy and more rapid improvements in psoriasis compared with either methotrexate or placebo.     

Ustekinumab improves health-related quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the PHOENIX 1 trial

Background PHOENIX 1 was a phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study that demonstrated the long‐term efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. Objectives To assess the effect of ustekinumab maintenance therapy on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in PHOENIX 1 patients. Patients and methods Patients (n = 766) were randomized to receive ustekinumab 45 mg (n = 255) or 90 mg (n = 256) at weeks 0 and 4 and every 12 weeks thereafter, or placebo (n = 255) at weeks 0 and 4 with crossover to ustekinumab at week 12. Ustekinumab‐randomized patients achieving at least 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 at weeks 28 and 40 were re‐randomized at week 40 to continue ustekinumab or be withdrawn until loss of therapeutic effect. HRQoL was assessed using the SF‐36 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Results At baseline, more than 97% had a DLQI > 1 and the average DLQI was > 10, indicating a significant impact on patients’ HRQoL. Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving ustekinumab 45 and 90 mg achieved a normalized DLQI score (≤ 1) compared with placebo (53·2%, 52·4% and 6·0%, respectively, both P < 0·001) at week 12 and achieved a clinically meaningful improvement (increase of at least five points) in SF‐36 physical (23·1%, 33·7% and 15·6%) and mental (25·5%, 31·3% and 14·8%) component summary scores. At week 12, changes in individual DLQI and SF‐36 domains were significantly better in each ustekinumab group vs. placebo (P < 0·001). The magnitude of improvement across SF‐36 scales was greatest for the bodily pain and social functioning domains. Improvements in HRQoL were sustained with maintenance ustekinumab therapy through at least 1 year. Regression analysis showed that, after adjustment for improvement in PASI or Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA), ustekinumab‐treated patients demonstrated significant improvements in DLQI. Conclusions Ustekinumab improves HRQoL in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. Patient‐reported outcomes measured a treatment effect beyond that indicated by clinical measures.     

Ustekinumab does not increase body mass index in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis: a prospective cohort study

Background Chronic plaque psoriasis is frequently associated with metabolic disorders including obesity. Antitumour necrosis factor α treatments can induce body‐weight increase in patients with psoriasis. Information on the effect of ustekinumab on body weight is not available. Objectives To investigate whether therapy with ustekinumab is associated with changes in body mass index (BMI) in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Methods A prospective, multicentre study comparing the changes in BMI in two closed cohorts of patients with psoriasis during 7‐month treatment with ustekinumab (n = 79) or infliximab (n = 83). Results Patients treated for 7 months with infliximab showed a significant (P < 0·001) increase in mean BMI (2·1 ± 4·5%) and body weight (2·5 ± 3·3 kg) compared with patients treated with ustekinumab (0·1 ± 3·3%; 0·6 ± 1·1 kg). Some 45% of patients treated with infliximab had a BMI increase > 2%, compared with only 11% of those receiving ustekinumab (P = 0·01). In the multivariate analysis, all other clinical parameters predicted the BMI increase, except for the use of infliximab. At month 7, 96% of patients treated with infliximab and 82% of patients treated with ustekinumab achieved at least a 50% improvement from their baseline psoriasis area and severity index (PASI 50), and 69% of the infliximab group compared with 58% of the ustekinumab group achieved at least PASI 75. There was no difference in the proportion of PASI 50 and PASI 75 responders between the two groups. Conclusions In contrast to infliximab, ustekinumab does not increase BMI in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. This difference could be taken into account in the selection of biologics when treating patients with psoriasis.     

Open-label, single-center, safety dose escalation trial of alefacept for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis

BACKGROUND: Alefacept (Amevive) is a fully human LFA-3/IgG1 fusion protein with a dual mechanism of action inhibiting T-cell activation and selectively reducing memory T cells. Alefacept is currently approved as a 12-week course of weekly 15 mg intramuscular (IM) injections for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. In clinical trials using the currently approved dosing regimen, 33% and 57% of patients achieved a 75% or greater or 50% or greater reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75 and PASI 50), respectively, after one course of alefacept. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of alefacept 15 mg IM weekly for 6 weeks followed by alefacept 30 mg IM weekly for 6 weeks. DESIGN: Open-label, single-center, dose escalation study of alefacept. PATIENTS: Adult patients with chronic plaque psoriasis involving a minimum body surface area of 10% and with a minimum PASI of 12. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with alefacept 15 mg IM for 6 weeks followed by alefacept 30 mg IM for an additional 6 weeks; doses were held for CD4 counts < 200 cells/mm(3) or evidence of a clinically significant infection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Efficacy was evaluated by PASI and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) at baseline, week 7, and 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled; at 6 weeks post-treatment, the PASI mean reduction was 39%, with continued improvement to 46% at 12 weeks post-treatment. The PASI 90, PASI 75, and PASI 50 responses at 12 weeks post-treatment were 6% (1 of 16), 13% (2 of 16), and 38% (6 of 16), respectively; 12% (2 of 16) of patients achieved a PGA of clear to almost clear at 12 weeks post-treatment. The overall PASI 75 and PASI 50 responses were 19% (3 of 16) and 38% (6 of 16), respectively. CONCLUSION: The treatment regimen of alefacept 15 mg IM for 6 weeks followed by alefacept 30 mg IM for 6 weeks was well tolerated by our patients. There was no increased incidence of infections when patients were treated with alefacept 30 mg compared with the 15 mg dose. The increased dose of alefacept 30 mg for the last 6 weeks of a 12-week course did not appear to yield a higher efficacy rate compared with historical controls.     

司库奇尤单抗治疗中重度斑块状银屑病的近期疗效及安全性观察

【摘要】 目的 观察司库奇尤单抗治疗中重度斑块状银屑病的近期疗效及安全性。方法 2019年6 - 11月收集就诊于河南省人民医院皮肤科的中重度斑块状银屑病患者36例,给予司库奇尤单抗单药皮下注射治疗,300 mg/次,分别于基线、第1、2、3、4周注射1次,随后每4周1次,分别于第4、8、12周时记录患者银屑病皮损面积和严重度指数（PASI）,观察药物不良反应。结果 36例患者均接受至少12周的治疗。4周时,8例达PASI75,其中3例达PASI90,1例达PASI100;8周时,26例达PASI75,其中16例达PASI90,4例达PASI100;12周时,32例达PASI75,其中26例达PASI90,8例达PASI100。所有患者均未发生严重感染或恶性肿瘤等严重药物不良反应,1例腹部皮下注射后出现腹痛、腹胀,持续3 d后症状消失;1例患者出现扁桃体炎,之后原有皮损处出现湿疹样改变;1例颈部出现化脓性淋巴结炎。结论 司库奇尤单抗治疗中重度斑块状银屑病疗效显著,不良反应较少,是中重度斑块状银屑病患者新的治疗选择之一。     

Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab treatment for Japanese patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis,erythrodermic psoriasis and generalized pustular psoriasis: Results from a 52‐week,open‐label,phase 3 study (UNCOVER‐J)

Psoriasis, a chronic, immune‐mediated skin disease characterized by red, scaly plaques, affects approximately 0.3% of the population in Japan. The aim of this open‐label study was to evaluate the long‐term efficacy and safety of ixekizumab, a humanized, anti‐interleukin‐17A monoclonal antibody, in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis (n = 78, including 11 psoriatic arthritis), erythrodermic psoriasis (n = 8) and generalized pustular psoriasis (n = 5). Ixekizumab was administrated s.c. at baseline (week 0, 160 mg), from weeks 2 to 12 (80 mg every 2 weeks), and from weeks 16 to 52 (80 mg every 4 weeks). At week 52, 92.3% of patients with plaque psoriasis achieved Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, 80.8% achieved PASI 90, 48.7% achieved PASI 100, and 52.6% had remission of plaques (by static Physician Global Assessment, sPGA [0]). Difficult to treat areas of psoriasis (nail or scalp) also responded to ixekizumab. All patients with psoriatic arthritis who were assessed (5/5) achieved an American College of Rheumatology 20 response. Most patients with erythrodermic psoriasis or generalized pustular psoriasis responded to ixekizumab and the clinical outcome was maintained over 52 weeks (75% and 60% of patients achieved sPGA [0, 1] at week 52, respectively). Mostly mild or moderate treatment‐emergent adverse events were reported by 79 of 91 patients; the most common were nasopharyngitis, eczema, seborrheic dermatitis, urticaria and injection site reactions. In conclusion, 52‐week ixekizumab treatment was efficacious and well tolerated in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis. Efficacy was also observed in patients with erythrodermic psoriasis, generalized pustular psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.