Economic evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: cost-effectiveness and quality-adjusted life years in a randomized controlled trial

The objective of this study is to evaluate the costs and health benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Randomized controlled clinical trial is used as the design. The setting is in a single tertiary cardiothoracic center in Middlesex, UK. Participants were 168 patients (27 females) requiring primary isolated CABG surgery. Patients were randomized to have the procedure performed by a single surgeon either with CPB (n = 84) or by an off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery (n = 84). Health-related quality of life was assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 months using the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life (WHOQOL-100) questionnaire. Mean total costs of patient management by either technique were calculated using different available key sources. A utility measure, derived from WHOQOL-100, was used to calculate quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained in each group, on basis of which a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed. The mean total costs of an OPCAB patient was 5859 pounds , whereas for a CPB patient it was 7431 pounds with a mean difference of 1572 pounds (standard error [SE] 674 pounds ; P = 0.02). Three patients died in the CPB group and two in the OPCAB group during the 6-month follow-up period. Mean QALYs over 6 months was 0.379 in the OPCAB group and 0.362 in the CPB group, but the difference was not significant (mean difference 0.017; SE 0.016; P = 0.305). OPCAB surgery offered patients in this randomized trial similar health benefits to CPB over a 6-month period, but at a significantly less cost.     

Benefits of off-pump bypass on neurologic and clinical morbidity: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Neurologic and clinical morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) can be significant. By avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass, off-pump CABG (OPCAB) may reduce morbidity. METHODS: Sixty patients (30 CABG and 30 OPCAB) were prospectively randomized. Neurocognitive testing was performed before the operation and 2 weeks and 1 year after the operation. Neurologic testing to detect stroke and (99m)Tc-HMPAO whole-brain single photon emission computed tomography scanning to assess cerebral perfusion were performed before the operation and 3 days afterward. Bilateral middle cerebral artery transcranial Doppler scanning was performed intraoperatively to detect cerebral microemboli. All examiners were blinded to treatment group. Clinical morbidity and costs were compared. RESULTS: Coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with more cerebral microemboli (575 +/- 278.5 CABG versus 16.0 +/- 19.5 OPCAB (median +/- semiinterquartile range) and significantly reduced cerebral perfusion after the operation to the bilateral occipital, cerebellar, precunei, thalami, and left temporal lobes (p < or = 0.01). Cerebral perfusion with OPCAB was unchanged. Compared with base line, OPCAB patients performed better on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (total and recognition scores) at both 2 weeks and at 1 year (p < or = 0.05), whereas CABG performance was statistically unchanged for all cognitive measures. Patients who underwent CABG had more chest tube drainage (1389 +/- 1256 mL CABG versus 789 +/- 586 mL OPCAB, p = 0.02) and required more blood (3.9 +/- 5.8 U CABG versus 1.2 +/- 2.2 U OPCAB, p = 0.02), fresh frozen plasma (3.0 +/- 6.0 U CABG versus 0.5 +/- 2.2 U OPCAB, p = 0.03), and hours of postoperative use of dopamine (16.3 +/- 21.2 hours CABG versus 7.3 +/- 9.7 hours OPCAB, p = 0.04). These differences culminated in higher costs for CABG ($23,053 +/- $5,320 CABG versus $17,780 +/- $4,390 OPCAB, p < 0.0001). One stroke occurred with CABG, compared with none with OPCAB (p = NS). One OPCAB patient died because of a pulmonary embolus (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CABG, OPCAB may reduce neurologic and clinical morbidity as well as cost.     

Myocardial revascularization without extracorporeal circulation

Contemporary treatment of coronary disease includes: drug treatment, percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI), with or without stent implantation and surgical myocardial revascularization. For more than 30 years, conventional coronary bypass (on-pump CABG), using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), represented the standard regarding myocardial revascularization, particularly in patients suffering from three vessel disease or left main coronary artery stenosis. Recent development of invasive cardiology and increased interest in coronary surgery on the beating heart (OPCAB), challenging traditional on-pump CABG procedure, as optimal strategy for the treatment of coronary artery disease. In order to improve clinical outcome, OPCAB seems to be a good choice in patients with co-morbidities critical for use of CPB. Results of OPCAB revascularization in general patient population are considerably different and require further evaluation. This review article shows the development of OPCAB and elaborates potential advantages and weaknesses of this method of revascularization, from both, theoretical and clinical point of view, compared to standard surgical myocardial revascularization.     

Off-pump surgery decreases postoperative complications and resource utilization in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Bypass surgery in the elderly (age >70 years) has increased mortality and morbidity, which may be a consequence of cardiopulmonary bypass. We compare the outcomes of a cohort of elderly off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) patients with elderly conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. METHODS: Chart and provincial cardiac care registry data were reviewed for 30 consecutive elderly OPCAB patients (age 74.7 +/- 4.2 years) and 60 consecutive CABG patients (age 74.9 +/- 4.1 years, p = 0.82) with similar risk factor profiles: Parsonnet score 17.2 +/- 8.1 (OPCAB) versus 15.6 +/- 6.5 (CABG), p = 0.31; and Ontario provincial acuity index 4.5 +/- 1.9 (OPCAB) versus 4.3 +/- 2.0 (CABG), p = 0.65. RESULTS: Mean hospital stay was 6.3 +/- 1.8 days for OPCAB patients and 7.7 +/- 3.9 days for CABG patients (p < 0.05). Average intensive care unit stay was 24.0 +/- 10.9 h for OPCAB patients versus 36.6 +/- 33.5 h for CABG patients (p < 0.05). Atrial fibrillation occurred in 10.0% of OPCAB patients and 28.3% of CABG patients (p < 0.05). Low output syndrome was observed in 10% of OPCAB patients and 31.7% of CABG patients (p < 0.05). Cost was reduced by $1,082 (Canadian) per patient in the OPCAB group. Postoperative OPCAB graft analysis showed 100% patency. CONCLUSIONS: OPCAB is safe in the geriatric population and significantly reduces postoperative morbidity and cost.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: initial experience at one community hospital

BACKGROUND: This study reports one cardiac surgical center's experience with off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and compares clinical risk factors and outcomes with a group of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass at the same institution. METHODS: Data on preoperative risk factors, intraoperative clinical markers, and postoperative outcomes were collected prospectively on all patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures at our institution. From January 1, 1999, through October 7, 1999, 332 patients underwent OPCAB procedures at our institution. This group was compared with 445 consecutive patients undergoing CABG at the same institution during the period of January 1, 1998, through November 30, 1998. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to preoperative clinical risk factors. Intraoperative data showed OPCAB patients tended to have fewer grafts performed and had a lower frequency of multiple grafts to obtuse marginal vessels. Outcomes showed no differences in the incidence of perioperative stroke, mediastinitis, reexploration for bleeding, pulmonary complications, new renal failure, postoperative atrial fibrillation, or transfusion of blood products. Patients in the OPCAB group had fewer perioperative myocardial infarctions and lower incidence of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. A higher percentage of OPCAB patients had surgical lengths of stay of 5 days or less. The OPCAB group tended to have a lower in-hospital mortality rate but this difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with revascularization of all coronary artery segments is a safe and effective procedure that can be performed with equal or improved outcomes and shorter surgical lengths of stay compared with CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Off-pump coronary surgery: how do the anesthetic considerations differ?

In recent years, there has been much interest in performing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery without the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Initial efforts focused on "minimally invasive" direct coronary artery bypass, wherein the left anterior descending artery is bypassed with an in situ left internal mammary artery graft through a small left anterior thoracotomy. A more widely adopted approach however, is off-pump CABG (OPCAB), in which CABG surgery is performed on one or more vessels through the usual median sternotomy approach without the aid of CPB. This article reviews the differences in the anesthetic considerations of OPCAB compared to conventional CABG using CPB.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in Japan

The number of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures has reached more than 20,000 per year in Japan, and the operative mortality rate has decreased to less than 1.5% including emergent surgery. The mortality and morbidity rates of CABG are still high in patients with risk factors such as cerebrovascular disease, chronic renal failure on hemodialysis, atheromatous and calcified ascending aorta, and older age when cardiopulmonary bypass is used. Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass on a beating heart through a small left lateral anterior thoracotomy, in which the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) is used to revascularize the left anterior descending artery, was introduced for high-risk patients with single-vessel disease in the mid-1990s, although is not widely performed at present. Since the late 1990s off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) has been widely performed as a treatment for multivessel disease through a median sternotomy with the evolution of stabilizers and apical suction devices, refined anesthetic management, and sophisticated surgical techniques. In 2004, 60% of all CABG procedures in Japan were performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. Due to competition from percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents and better long-term outcomes, CABG with arterial grafts alone was carried out in 52% of total cases and in 66% of OPCAB cases. OPCAB is becoming the standard CABG in Japan.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass: techniques, pitfalls, and results

In coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), coronary artery anastomosis is generally performed under cardiac arrest using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). To avoid the invasiveness of CPB, off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) is currently also used. In Japan, in particular, OPCAB now accounts for 60 % of all CABG operations and has become a standard surgical procedure. We herein provide a discussion of OPCAB. The goals of coronary artery bypass surgery are to achieve complete revascularization and maintain a high rate of graft patency for the long term. This requires stable exposure of the coronary arteries, including those located on the posterior surface of the heart and the formation of good-quality anastomoses. Achieving this depends not only on the competency of the individual surgeon, but also on smooth and effective teamwork among everyone involved, including the other surgeons, anesthetists, clinical technicians, and nurses. It is important for surgeons and surgical teams to examine their own outcomes and engage in self-scrutiny in an endeavor to improve these outcomes.     

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and postoperative renal dysfunction

Renal dysfunction is a serious complication after coronary bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CABG). Because duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with renal outcome, it has been proposed that avoidance of CPB with off-pump coronary bypass (OPCAB) may reduce perioperative renal insult. We therefore tested the hypothesis that OPCAB is associated with less postoperative renal dysfunction compared with CABG surgery. With IRB approval, we gathered data for 690 primary elective coronary bypass patients (OPCAB, 55; CABG, 635). Perioperative change in creatinine clearance (DCrCl) was calculated by using preoperative (CrPre) and peak postoperative (CrPost) serum creatinine values, and the Cockroft-Gault equation (DCrCl = CrPreCl - CrPostCl). Univariate and linear multivariate tests were used in this retrospective analysis; P: < 0.05 was considered significant. Multivariate analysis did not identify OPCAB surgery as an independent predictor of DCrCl. However, previously reported associations of PreCrCl, age, and diabetes with DCrCl were confirmed. Power analysis demonstrated an 80% power to detect a 7.0 mL/min DCrCl difference between study groups. In this retrospective study, we could not confirm that OPCAB significantly reduces perioperative renal dysfunction compared with CABG surgery. Our findings suggest that reduction of renal risk alone should not be an indication for OPCAB over CABG surgery. Implications: Retrospective analysis did not identify any significant difference in perioperative change in creatinine clearance after coronary revascularization with cardiopulmonary bypass compared with off-pump coronary surgery.     

Current status of coronary artery bypass grafting

The number of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has reached more than 21,000 cases per year in Japan, and the operative mortality has decreased less than 1% including emergent operation. There are 2 trends in CABG. One is the revival and wide spread of off-pump CABG (OPCAB). The other is multiple arterial coronary revascularization. In 2004 and 2005, 60% of all CABG procedures in Japan were performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. For competition with percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents and better long-term outcomes, CABG with only arterial grafts was carried out in 52% of total cases and 66% of OPCAB cases. OPCAB with multiple arterial grafts has been becoming the standard CABG in Japan. We reviewed OPCAB and arterial CABG including new technology.     

A comparison of bleeding and transfusion in patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting via sternotomy with and without cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is a difference between on-pump cardiopulmonary bypass (CABG) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) without heparin reversal with regard to bleeding, transfusion requirements, and incidence of surgical re-exploration of the mediastinum. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: A large academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred CABG patients were compared with 100 OPCAB patients. Statistical significance was measured with P values of 相似文献   

Symmetry aortic connector devices and acute renal injury: a comparison of renal dysfunction after three different aortocoronary bypass surgery techniques

Although the pathogenesis of acute renal injury after cardiac surgery is multifactorial, atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta and embolic burden are strong independent predictors. Use of the Symmetry aortic connector device (ACD) for proximal anastomosis of coronary grafts may reduce ascending aortic atheroembolism. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery performed using an ACD is associated with less postoperative renal dysfunction compared with conventional OPCAB or on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Three-thousand-three-hundred consecutive patients undergoing non-emergent aortocoronary bypass surgery were retrospectively divided into three groups by surgical procedure; Group A: OPCAB with ACD (n = 124), Group B: standard OPCAB (n = 313), Group C: on-pump CABG (n = 2863). Postoperative peak fractional change in creatinine compared with baseline was used as a measure of renal outcome. Multivariable analysis did not identify ACD use as an independent predictor of postoperative peak fractional change in creatinine (P = 0.71), although the relationships of several known renal risk factors with postoperative peak fractional change in creatinine were confirmed. We could not find evidence that OPCAB surgery using ACDs reduces acute renal injury compared with standard OPCAB or CABG surgery.     

On- and off-pump coronary surgery and perioperative myocardial infarction: an issue between incomplete and extensive revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: Complete myocardial revascularization is the standard for coronary artery bypass grafting. It has been shown, however, that off-pump coronary bypass surgery (OPCAB) may reduce completeness of revascularization without affecting perioperative myocardial infarction rates. We evaluated the influence of OPCAB on major postoperative events in a large consecutive cohort of patients, with special emphasis on risk factors for perioperative myocardial infarction. METHODS: From 1995 to 2004, 5935 patients underwent isolated coronary bypass surgery; of these, 4623 (77.9%) and 1312 (22.1%) underwent on-pump coronary surgery (CABG) and OPCAB, respectively. Patients undergoing OPCAB were matched to patients undergoing CABG by propensity score; logistic regression analysis models were used to study predictors of perioperative myocardial infarction. RESULTS: In matched pairs, postoperative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and atrial fibrillation were similar between groups, while reoperation for bleeding, time on ventilator and red blood cell use were lower in patients undergoing OPCAB. The number of distal anastomoses was lower in patients undergoing OPCAB (2.2+/-0.80 in OPCAB vs 2.9+/-0.86 in CABG, p<0.001), as well as complete revascularization rates (61.9% in OPCAB vs 90.0% in CABG, p<0.001). Multivariate analyses, performed on preoperative and intraoperative variables, showed that both incomplete revascularization and increasing numbers of distal anastomoses (even when controlling for completeness of revascularization) were significant predictors of perioperative myocardial infarction, while CABG/OPCAB strategy did not influence it. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of surgical technique did not influence the occurrence of major perioperative complications and of myocardial infarction, which is negatively affected by incomplete or too extensive revascularization strategies.     

Advantages and limitations in minimally invasive cardiac surgery

The introduction of endoscopic technology to cardiovascular surgery was significantly delayed compared to abdominal and lung surgery, although it has been gradually introduced in this field during the past decade in closure of patent ductus arteriosus, repair of the vascular ring, implantation of pacemaker leads or AICD, and pericardectomy. Endoscopic technology also started to be used in harvesting saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and the left internal thoracic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) from the mid-1990s. Although complete endoscopic surgery has not yet been established in the major field of standard cardiovascular surgery, many cardiac surgeons attempt to minimize the size of chest wounds with 6- to 8-cm skin incisions, which is called minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) or minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB). Complete endoscopic cardiac surgeries were performed utilizing the Zeus system and Da Vinci system at the end of the 20th century. Another method to minimize the invasiveness of CABG is to perform it without cardiopulmonary bypass, so-called off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). Currently, less-invasive procedures are mainly applied for relatively simple cardiac surgeries, although these procedures are also potentially effective to avoid postoperative cerebral or respiratory complications in high-risk patients. MICS is effective in reducing the size of surgical wounds and in decreasing intraoperative blood loss. On the other hand, the duration of anesthesia and surgery can be prolonged due to technical difficulty, and the risk of unsatisfactory anastomosis or incomplete revascularization can also be increased. The cardiopulmonary bypass circuit utilized for MICS requires a more complicated system including negative pressure venous drainage. The detection of accidental trouble during surgery, which is related to the extracorporeal circulation or the MICS procedure itself, can be delayed due to the limited surgical view. MICS procedures carry additional risks related to the more complicated cardiopulmonary bypass system and small surgical wound. We must be deliberate in determining the indications for MICS and obtain complete informed consent from patients when we perform MICS, including informing them of the additional risks related to the MICS procedure itself and the possibility of conversion to standard open-heart surgery.     

Platelet function after coronary artery bypass grafting: is there a procoagulant activity after off-pump compared with on-pump surgery?

OBJECTIVE: After off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) haemostasis might be better preserved compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to investigate whether this possibly better preserved haemostasis results in a procoagulant activity of the platelets. DESIGN: Thirty patients were studied prospectively, 15 undergoing on-pump CABG and 15 undergoing OPCAB. Platelet function was evaluated four times within the first 24 h: preoperatively, postoperatively, 4 h and 1 day after surgery with a bedside whole blood clotting test. RESULTS: A significant increase of platelet-activating-factor-induced platelet aggregation was observed postoperatively after OPCAB (p < 0.01). Only two patients did not reach preoperative values within 1 day postoperatively and four patients had a more than twofold increase. Platelet aggregation immediately after on-pump CABG was reduced to near half of preoperative values, but within 1 day postoperatively normal platelet aggregation was regained in half of the patients. CONCLUSION: This study has mainly indicated that platelets after OPCAB were more easily activated in the early postoperative period. After CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass we found a temporary platelet dysfunction which seemed to be overcome within the first postoperative day.     

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: the Zurich experience

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the surgical procedure of choice for treatment of multi-vessel coronary artery disease. The rising risk profile of the patients requiring isolated CABG and the economic pressure have prompted us to devise new operative strategies to treat these patients. Elimination of the cardiopulmonary bypass is one possible answer to the dilemma of maintaining the quality of care and reducing the exploding costs of our health system. Therefore, we developed the off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) for patients requiring isolated CABG. In our experience the key to successful OPCAB relies on the order of revascularization of the myocardial walls (anterior, inferior, lateral), use of intracoronary shunt, no-touch technique for the proximal aortic anastomosis with heart string a (Guidant, IN, USA), close collaboration with the anesthesiologists, early and aggressive administration of anti-platelet therapy, endoscopic vein harvest by perfusionists, and improved body temperature control. Following these concepts, we have been able to offer the OPCAB procedure to over 90% of our patients and to reduce perioperative morbidity and global costs.     

A Prospective Observational Study to Compare Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery with Off‐Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on Basis of EuroSCORE

Abstract Introduction: The use of cardiopulmonary bypass during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery has been associated with substantial morbidity. Off‐pump coronary bypass (OPCAB) surgery has become a widely used technique during recent years. EuroSCORE risk scale is the most rigorously evaluated scoring system in cardiac surgery to preoperatively quantify the risk of death and other serious postoperative complications. The aim of this prospective observational study was to compare the mortality and morbidity between OPCAB and conventional CABG in three major preoperative groups as assessed by EuroSCORE. Material and Method: All consecutive patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass surgery between January 2003 and December 2004 at Wellington Hospital were included. In this period, 347 patients had conventional CABG and 254 patients had OPCAB. Data were prospectively collected according to Australasian Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons’ cardiac surgery data set. The preoperative additive EuroSCORE was computed in each patient and the patients were divided into three risk groups. Results of OPCAB and conventional CABG were compared on basis of EuroSCORE group. Results: OPCAB surgery is preferably performed in patients with low‐risk. OPCAB group had lesser number of grafts per patient. When adjusted with risk score, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality in any of the three groups. No significant difference was found for stroke, renal dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, re‐exploration for bleeding, deep sternal wound infection, or pulmonary complications in either of three groups. However, inotropic requirement and requirements of blood products were less in OPCAB group. Conclusion: OPCAB does not offer any significant advantage in terms of mortality and morbidity over conventional CABG. (J Card Surg 2010;25:495‐500)     

Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass is gaining popularity as an alternative to conventional on-pump technique for myocardial revascularization. This includes minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and full sternotomy off-pump (OPCAB) methods. These two approaches should be evaluated for financial and clinical appropriateness. METHODS: Records of patients who had single or double bypass (internal mammary artery and/or saphenous vein) grafts between January 1997 and June 1998 were reviewed. These included 44 MIDCAB, 62 OPCAB, and 243 conventional coronary artery bypass (CCAB) patients. Univariate analysis was applied to pre, intra, and postoperative variables, comparing MIDCAB and OPCAB to the CCAB group. Procedural cost information was obtained from participating institutions. RESULTS: MIDCAB patients compared to CCAB patients had a higher predicted risk (5.4+/-11 versus 2.3+/-2.8, p = 0.012) and OPCAB patients had a predicted risk of 5.3+/-7.8. MIDCAB and OPCAB procedures required less operating room time and blood utilization. Observed operative mortality rates were MIDCAB 4.5%, OPCAB 1.6%, and CCAB 2.8% (not significant). Mean hospital costs were CCAB at $19,000, OPCAB at $15,000, and $17,000 for MIDCAB. CONCLUSIONS: Off pump procedures currently reflect acute episode-of-care cost savings over CCAB.     

On/off-pump beating coronary artery bypass grafting after thoracoplasty

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [OPCAB] or on-pump beating CABG (conventional CABG) was performed in 3 post-thoracoplasty patients. Considering their poor respiratory function after thoracoplasty, OPCAB is considered more suitable than conventional CABG with cardio-pulmonary bypass in such cases with severe coronary lesions. However, because the sternum inclines or the pleural cavity may be polluted in these patients, special care is necessary for the operation. In such cases, it may be impossible to bypass to the circumflex artery in OPCAB, and is necessary to consider the use of percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS), cardio-pulmonary bypass or hybrid therapy before the operation.     

Coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass versus off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass grafting: does eliminating the pump reduce morbidity and cost?

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may contribute to the complications and cost of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Off-pump CABG (OPCAB) allows coronary revascularization without CPB. We hypothesized that OPCAB provides satisfactory graft patency while reducing complications and cost compared with CABG with CPB. METHODS: We prospectively followed 80 patients undergoing CABG: 40 patients undergoing OPCAB and 40 patients undergoing CABG with CPB. OPCAB patients underwent angiography within 48 hours of surgery to determine early graft patency. Incidence of complications, length of stay, and costs were recorded for each patient. The influence of the number of vessels bypassed was analyzed. RESULTS: OPCAB patients (n = 40) underwent grafting of 2.7 +/- 0.7 vessels per patient compared with 3.6 +/- 0.8 vessels per patient in the CABG with CPB group (n = 40) (p < 0.0001). Angiography demonstrated 105 of 108 (97%) of grafts were patent in the OPCAB group. Incidence of complications, length of stay, and costs did not differ between the OPCAB and CABG with CPB groups. Number of vessels grafted showed a positive correlation to total costs in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: While OPCAB provided satisfactory early graft patency, there was no significant difference between OPCAB and CABG with CPB with regard to cost, length of stay, or incidence of complications. In this study, eliminating CPB did not reduce morbidity or cost after CABG.